If I run sp_who2, the following message is returned. (it also is returned randomly while using function in EM such as Backup/Restore.)
Msg 268, Level 16, State 1
You cannot run SELECT INTO in this database. The DBO would have to run sp_dboption to enable this option.
What is it??? It's buggin me......
Dano
p.s. I remember a similar problem in the past, it had to do with turning truncate on checkpoint in one of the system databases msdb/master/tempdb or something like that. I turned off all Trunc. and Select/Bulk options on these...
I have registered a server on to my client machine successfully,but I am not finding the current activity item in the management folder on EM.How do I see the current activity on the server.Do I need to be SA for that server?My machine has NT workstation with SQL server 7.0 on it.Any one to help?
Trying to view current activity in EM however get error 1222 Lock request time out period exceeded, this also occurs when trying to view tempdb database.
Is this a EM Gui error or locking issue and hwo do you resolve?
On sql server 6.5 running on a win/nt platform my Current Activity window comes up blank when I click on it. Everything else seems to be working fine. This is a new problem, it just stopped reporting any info when I click on it. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Hi there! in the ms-enterprise manager , the current activity.. under server menu does not display anything in one of the server in EM but in other servers it is okay.
What to check on NT or Sql server it self if 1. NT performance shows that sql serve.exe -CPU 93% memory 49000 2. Sql server current activity only sa connected to master. Thanks
Just recently I noticed something that I consider very strange on a SQL7.0 server with SP1.
In [Server -> Management -> Current Activity -> Process Info] I see a great number of rows(connections) around 70 or so that all have the same net_address value. However, the nt_loginame is different on each.
Q1: How can this be? Q2: Isn't the net_address really the MAC of the network card?
Also, on a test SQL7.0 server with SP1 where the connections are far less (around 15 or so), I noticed the same problem. Luckily, because the connection count is low I was able to go around to each machine where the nt_loginame was used to log on and found that the net_address shown in [Current Acivity] didn't match any of these machines. Why?
In SQL Server 7.0 Enterprise Manager | node-name | Management | Current Activity, if I try to refresh the current activity or view the current activity data, I get a hourglass for several minutes, then an error message box that says:
Error 3621: Lock request time out period exceeded. The statement has been terminated. The statement has been terminated. [OK].
I need to see the current activity to check on blocking, etc.
Dear AllI have problem with my database server which running SQL server 2000.The server running very slow. The worst case, to save a record requiredmore than 20-30 seconds.Since this problem, I usually monitoring Process Info from EnterpriseManager (Management - Current Activity), and I found a misteriousprocess as follow :1. User: SystemAccessTo: MasterStatus: BackgroundCommon: Task ManagerWaiting: >438 Million2. User: SystemAccessTo: MasterStatus: BackgroundCommon: Task ManagerPhysical IO: > 510003. User: Administrator (Join domain)Database: MSDBStatus: SleepingCommon: Awaiting CommandApp: SQL Agent Alert EngineCPU Usage: > 16 MillionAnybody know about these condition? Does it normal?ThanksMichael
I've this query SELECT t1.ID, t1.Date, t1.Time, t1.VALUE FROM RESULT WHERE t1.Date>=CONVERT(VARCHAR(10),DATEADD(d,-7,GETDATE()),101) AND t1.Date<CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), GETDATE(), 101)
Let's say, current date is 8 AUG 2005 and current time is 2045 So, i will get ID | Date (this is datetime) | Time (this is integer) | Value -------------------------------------------------- 204 | 8/1/2005| 2359 | 90 205 | 8/1/2005| 2250 | 99 206 | 8/1/2005| 1950 | 88 ... ... 207 | 8/7/2005| 1845 | 77 208 | 8/7/2005| 2255 | 77 209 | 8/7/2005| 2140 | 77
Can someone can show me to filter data between t1.Date>=CONVERT(VARCHAR(10),DATEADD(d,-7,GETDATE()),101) AND TIME>=CurrentTime t1.Date<CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), GETDATE(), 101) AND TIME<=CurrentTime
If current date is 8 AUG 2005 and current time is 2045, so the result shown as follow
ID | Date (this is datetime) | Time (this is integer) | Value -------------------------------------------------- 204 | 8/1/2005| 2359 | 90 205 | 8/1/2005| 2250 | 99 ... ... 207 | 8/7/2005| 1845 | 77
I only have this query, SELECT t1.ID, t1.Date, t1.Time, t1.VALUE FROM RESULT WHERE t1.Date>=CONVERT(VARCHAR(10),DATEADD(d,-7,GETDATE()),101) AND t1.Date<CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), GETDATE(), 101)
What is the best to produce user activity log ? Using triggers (insert, delete, update) is rather heavy (?) operation. Has anyone used SQL Profiler for that ? In log should be: who, what, when, workstation, table, changed fields, some data key values.
I have a requirment to create a activity log to log all changes that take place in my tables as they happen. All my Inserts,updates & Deletes take place inside stored procs. A windows .NET application calls the stored procs and passes the data set to the stored procs to execute them on a Sql server 2000 database.
When an update statement is run inside my stored proc, the dataset only passes me the new values. but,i will need the old value from the database before the update takes place to report in my activity log. What is the best way to do it ?
My activity log shold report a description like this
"Name Changed from 'Robert Johnson'(old value) to 'Bob Johnson'(New Value)"
Though i can do a select from the tables to get the old values and match the new values to get the differences before running the update statements, it is too much work as i have well over 100 stored procs in my application and i have to check for every single field value in a table. If only one column changed in a table containg 20 columns, i would still have to check for 20 columns before determining which fields changed.
Can any one suggest me a better solution to report the old values and new values for all the updates that take place in a database through stored Procedures.
Hi experts, I just want to know how can i kill all the processes of a database if the database have more than 100 connections.This is for the purpose of restoring a database.
I usually run this command in SQL 2000. Which tells me what is running with all the sql code statements.
Is there an alternative command to run in SQL 2005...rather than using the Reports - i find it easier to execute sp i called this sp_now.
set nocount on declare @handle binary(20), @spid smallint, @rowcnt smallint, @output varchar(500)
declare ActiveSpids CURSOR FOR select sql_handle, spid from sysprocesses where sql_handle <> 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 --and spid <> @@SPID order by cpu desc
OPEN ActiveSpids FETCH NEXT FROM ActiveSpids INTO @handle, @spid
I am new at this site and new at using SQL also.... I was wondering if anyone could help me out with my prob...
I have set up an SQL 2000 server and made some accounts which my friends are using to log onto my server.. Is there a way I could keep a check on who is doin what or maintain a user log....
I have a SSIS which copies data from a table to a flat file. The connection string of this file is variable and the file is reused if not exists and is created if exists.
When I run the SSIS manually from my microsoft visual studio it works properly. However, when I run this SSIS from the Job Activity Monitor, I get the following error:
Message Executed as user: REDCAMadminsql2k5. Microsoft (R) SQL Server Execute Package Utility Version 9.00.3042.00 for 64-bit Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1984-2005. All rights reserved. Started: 8:41:10 AM Error: 2007-09-10 08:48:04.99 Code: 0xC020200E Source: Crear Historico Historico [1] Description: Cannot open the datafile "\srvnfileHISTORICOSCAJEROSOFI3210C01OFI3210C01_2007-7X.txt". End Error Error: 2007-09-10 08:48:04.99 Code: 0xC004701A Source: Crear Historico DTS.Pipeline Description: component "Historico" (1) failed the pre-execute phase and returned error code 0xC020200E. End Error DTExec: The package execution returned DTSER_FAILURE (1). Started: 8:41:10 AM Finished: 8:48:53 AM Elapsed: 462.234 seconds. The package execution failed. The step failed.
A developer is running sql transactions from the application and needs to know how it is executed from database, I know I have to run Profiler Trace, but not exactly which traces , Can you please guide me?
Does anybody know how to trace user activity after they log off from the SQL Server 6.5? I know SQL Trace is able to trace the user activity in real time.
We have a great big database (90gb) which has been populated (monopolised) by our finance team, and its full of tables that probably aren't being used at all. But know knows whats being used and what isn't or they don't have the time to go through it with me.
So I have decided to implement a procedure that logs table activity on this database, and if for example a table isn't used for a month then it will be archived off and zipped up.
I have a few ideas in my head how I can acheive this, but I am looking for some opinions and ideas from you guys?
I'm an Oracle DBA that has inherited some SQL Server 2000 databases. Can you audit a particular user in Sql Server 2000. We need to know exactly what a particular user is doing, (i.e. creating/dropping objects, and what data he is accessing)
I'm trying to produce a user activity table out of a table that contains rows on when users log in or out. However, I can't seem to get the query to 'pick' the right date time in the join.
Here is what I came up with, but it doesn't seem to be working right :eek:
select distinct (userin.changeid), userin.userid, userin.createdate as LoggedInDate, userout.createdate as LoggedOutDate, DateDiff(mm,userin.createdate,userout.createdate) as Duration from userChange userin inner join ( select * from userChange where loggedin = 0 ) userout on userin.userid = userout.userid where and userin.loggedin = 1 and userin.createdate < userout.createdate order by userin.createdate desc
We have several SQL 2000 databases on one server. One of the applications I'm responsible for has batch jobs that run for an hour; all activity is on the database. During this hour, other applications that use other databases on the same server experience time-outs. One of my coworkers did a count(*) on an empty table and it took 11 seconds.
We pay people to keep our servers up and running. Is this something they might solve by reconfiguring the server? It seems strange to me that a single database is allowed to hog all server resources. We are meeting with them later this week, and I'd like to have some knowledge about this; we don't want to BS'ed into buying a new server.
I have a strange situation. Performance monitor shows that SQLServer:Transactions Transactions value is 125, but SQL Server Profiler does not show any activity.
I ran sp_who2 and I have a bunch of processes with SUSPENDED status. Would those be counted in Performance monitor?
Very new to SQL server, and the database world in general. We're an old Oracle shop, and our Oracle dba's are pretty set in their ways and aren't too excited about supporting SQL server. Understandable, change is tough sometimes. Being the new kid in town, I have made it my goal to wrangle our SQL 2000/2005 environment and carve out my own little niche.
My first order of business is to do some general cleanup and documentation. So, my question is this... is there a way to determine when the last few user connection to a database were? I have a host of databases that I suspect are no longer in use, but no one can seem to identify them. Before I delete them, I definitely want to make sure they aren't being used by some off-the-beaten-path app that I am unaware of. I did a search here and a general Google search that was fruitless. I'm not the beast Googler though. :)
Any advice here will be greatly appreciated!
-Alan-
edit: My idea of a solution would be a query to show, say, the last 10 connections to a particular database. Username, date, time, etc. would be spectacular.