We have an inventory table (Items) that contains item_no and qty_on_handfields.Another table (Item_Serial) contains serial numbers for any item that hasserial numbers.If an item has 10 qty_on_hand, it should have 10 records in Item_Serial, oneunique serial number for each item.I am trying to find items where the number of serial numbers does not equalthe qty_on_hand.Here is a query I'm trying to use and, of course, it does not work:select Items.item_no, Items.qty_on_handfrom Items inner join Item_Serial on Item_Serial.item_no = Items.item_nowhere Items.qty_on_hand <count(Item_Serial.item_no)Anybody know how to do this?Thanks.
Hi,I am getting errors in the following... Is it even possible to join onCONTAINS?SELECT ListA.ContentFROM ListA LEFT OUTER JOIN ListBON CONTAINS(ListB.Content, ListA.Content)WHERE ListB.Content IS NULLThanks!
hello friend i have table1 and table2 and table3.. i have category and product number and name of colums for per table i want to do this.. select category from table1 where category= textbox1.text and category from table2 where category= textbox1.text and category from table 3 where category= textbox1.text and if there are category for per category colums of per table, gridview should displayed table1 and table2 and table2 in category and name and product number of colums:) if there is category of coulums for table1, gridview should displayed just table1 in category and name and product number of colums:) i want to 3 bind for gridview1 :) it should be without join because i dont need join.. columns name is same for tables but value of category is different but it can be same :) cheers
How do you express neither no in TSQL. I am trying to create a view that gathers work orders that are neither in one table nor in another I tried the following few appraoches but feel there must be something better. thanks!
1. Select * FROM xyz WHERE Status = Open AND (Number NOT IN (SELECT WONumber FROM dbo.Table1) OR Number NOT IN (SELECT WONumber FROM dbo.Table2)) 2. Select * FROM xyz WHERE Status = Open AND Number NOT IN (SELECT WONumber FROM dbo.Table1) UNION Select * FROM xyz WHERE Status = Open AND Number NOT IN (SELECT WONumber FROM dbo.Table2)
Hi, I have a problem I have two tables, table1 my main table and table2 my secondary table. Table1 has lots of records with a field for a unique transaction number, table2 also has a field for a transaction number. Table 2 only has a 10 entries in with the same transaction number of 10 of the entries in table1. My question is how do I get all the records from table1 that DONT have a corrisponding transaction number in table2.
Now, I want to check whether all the codes in table1 existing in table2 and list them, and if both columns from table1 is matching with the both columns in table2. For e.g. 256|abc in table1 is matching with 256|abc in table2
I'm trying to update a value into a table a sum. The two tables have ID values. These ID values appear once in Table1 and multiple times in Table2. I'm currently trying to sum up the values in Table2 where the IDs are equal to Table1 and then update the value:
UPDATE [Table1] SET [Total] = (SELECT SUM([Table2].[QTY]) FROM [Table2], [Table1] WHERE [Table1].[ID] = [Table2].[ID] GROUP BY [Table1].[ID]) FROM [Table1], [Table2] WHERE [Table1].[ID] = [Table2].[ID]
Hi guys,i have a little problem here.im attempting to write a stored procedure that compares two tables ofthe same data structure and adds (inserts) extra records that exist intable1 to table2.My problem is that i dont have a unique identifier between the tables.i think someone said that i needed to build up a keyany ideas greatly appreciated ??C
Hello,I have 2 tables, Table1 and Table2. I have copied all data from Table1to Table2.However Table1 is dynamic it has new rows added and some old rowsmodified everyday or every other day...How can I continue to keep Table2 up to date without always having tocopy everything from Table1?Basically from now on I would only like to copy new rows or modifiedrows in Table1 to Table2 and skip rows that are already present andhave not been modified in Table1. I would like to not do anything forany rows that were removed in Table1 and continue to keep a copy ofthem in Table2.Is using a DTS package the best way to automate this update of Table2to make sure Table2 is always up-to-date with Table1?Thanks for any help or advise :-)Yas
Is it possible to move rows from Table1 in Database1 to Table2 in Database2?
Say, I have Database1 containg Table1:
ID ¶ Cars --------------- 1 BMW 2 Mercedes 3 Toyota 1 Opel etc....
And Database2 containg Table2 (that is empty just at the moment): ID ¶ Cars --------------- no data added yet...
How can I copy say everything from Table1 that has ID=1 (the parameter I send in with the stored procedure at execution), and insert this in Table 2? This would be, I insert the row with the BMW thingy and the row with the Opel thingy as 2 new rows in table 2. Note that the two tables are located in 2 different databases.
I am using SQL Server 7 and am trying to implement this in a stored procedure.
Hi everyoneI am trying to create a DELETE Trigger. I have 2 tables. Table1 andTable2. Table 2 has all the same fields and records as Table1 + 1extra column "date_removed"I would like that when a record is deleted from Table 1, the triggerfinds that record in Table2 and updates the date_removed filed withcurrent time stamp.The primary key on both is combination of domain,admin_group and cn.CREATE TRIGGER [tr_updateTable2] ON [dbo].tbl_Table1FOR DELETEASUpdate Table2SET date_removed = getDate()I'm stuck here, how do I manipulate on Table2 only the records thatwere deleted on Table1, so to only update date_removed filed for themin Table2?I guess i need to compare domain, cn and admin_group, but I don't knowhow.Any help would be greatly appreciatedThanks! :-)
Declare @SQuery nvarchar(3000) set @TblName1 = '[' + @TblName1 + ']' set @TblType = '[' + @TblType + ']'
SELECT @SQuery = 'select top 10 a.commodity1 as HS4, b.descrip_1 as Description, sum(a.all_val_mo) as [Amount],
(sum(a.all_val_mo)/(select Sum(a.all_val_mo) FROM ' + @TblName1 + 'a where a.stat_month <=' + @Month + ' and a.district=' + @District +'))*100 as [% Share]
FROM ' + @TblName1 + ' a left outer join ' + @TblType + ' b on a.commodity1=b.commodity1 where a.stat_month <=' + @Month + ' and a.district=' + @District +' Group by a.commodity1, b.descrip_1 order by [Amount] desc'
Good day., please help me,in a formview control, i set it in Insert Mode, so it should display info from table 1 but when i click on the insert button, it will insert it in table 2.btw, table 1 and table 2 are in the same database?? how about if they are not in the same database?how?please help me,Thanks.,SALAMAT PO.,
Hi everybodyI'm a newbie to SQL-Server 2005 so please excuse me for my silly questionsRecently i wrote a simple web-Page in which i select data from a table and then bind them to a GridView on the formevery thing was simple as follows: SqlConnection Con = new SqlConnection("Data Source=.;Initial Catalog=Test;Integrated Security=True"); Con.Open(); SqlDataAdapter da = new SqlDataAdapter("SELECT [ID], [Name], [Date] FROM [Table1] ORDER BY [Date]", Con); DataSet ds = new DataSet(); da.Fill(ds,"MyTable"); GridView1.DataSource = ds.Tables["MyTable"]; GridView1.DataBind(); But I have a question , when i change the [Table1] to [table1] (With lowercase T) , i receive the following errormessage: Invalid object name 'table1'. why is that? could anyone help me? even i tried to test this issue in [Microsoft Management Studio] and i got thesame result . realy what's the reason? before and with sql server 2000 i didn't have these issue. Thanks in advance.Regards.
I want to get some combined data from both tables, so right now I am joining them at the SessionStartTime column, which is a primary key in the first and a foreign key in the second table, something like this:
Code: SELECT DlIndexTable.SessionStartTime, DlTextDataTable.Channel01data FROM DlIndexTable LEFT JOIN DlTextDataTable ON DlIndexTable.SessionStartTime = DlTextDataTable.SessionStartTime WHERE DlIndexTable.SessionStartTime BETWEEN '2006-10-13 16:40:08.790' AND '2012-03-01 17:54:30.930' ORDER BY DlIndexTable.SessionStartTime, DlTextDataTable.ChTimestamp
The trouble is that this query, exactly as requested, gives me all the entries from the second table matching the first, while I really would like to pick just one row (preferably, the first chronologically - by ChTimestamp) so that the first column (SessionStartTime) has distinct entries in the resulting table. What would be the simplest way of doing that? Performance is not a big priority over simplicity since the first table could have only a few hundred rows (maybe a couple of thousand), while the second will be real tiny.
my table isCustomer Customer Id--------- ----------------Mary 1Jhon 2Anna 3OrderId CustomerId Product ProductDesc------- --------- --------- -----------1 1 video bla bla2 1 tv bla bala3 2 video bla bla4 2 cd bla blaI want to see-------marry tv bla blaJohn cd bla blaanna
I have a table with a large number of records that I need to delete, before attempt to perform the delete I also archived the records to another table.
So I need to delete all of these selected records stored in the archive table from the main table. I can now reference all the records that qualify for the delete in the main table by performing a join on the archive table like so:
select * from my_main_table a join my_archive_table b on a.distinct_id=b.distinct_id and a.surrogate_key=b.surrogate_key and a.identifier=b.indentifier
So all the records check out to be the ones I'd like to perform a delete on but I just can't figure out how to perform a delete of the records with little or no change to the existing query.
Obviously something like this won't work:
delete from my_main_table a join my_archive_table b on a.distinct_id=b.distinct_id and a.surrogate_key=b.surrogate_key and a.identifier=b.indentifier
Though it would be nice if it did.:D
So my question is how would I use the existing query with some modification to delete only the records that this query returns. I've tried selection of records in the main table based on the existing records in the archive table but it can return a higher number of records than what I know is expected. I actually need the join specified to be in place to do it.