Tracking Forums, Newsgroups, Maling Lists
Home Scripts Tutorials Tracker Forums
  Advanced Search
  HOME    TRACKER    MS SQL Server






SuperbHosting.net have generously sponsored dedicated servers to ensure a reliable and scalable dedicated hosting solution for BigResource.com.





ORDER BY In Subquery Of A UNION Fails ???


Hi all,

I have the following UNION ALL statement that is my attempt to gather data for the past 5 weekdays (adding a "dummy" row for today's data).

I want the final output to end up in descending order, so for today, I would want today first, then Tuesday, then Monday, then Friday, then Thursday (provided there is data for each sequential day - if not, you get the idea, I want to select back to get the latest 5 days, most recent to oldest).

This select fails, because it doesn't like the ORDER BY in the subqueryselect
CASE
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Monday' THEN
'MON'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Tuesday' THEN
'TUES'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Wednesday' THEN
'WED'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Thursday' THEN
'THUR'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Friday' THEN
'FRI'
END AS Dow, 'N/A' AS Freight
UNION ALL
(select top 4
CASE
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Monday' THEN
'MON'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Tuesday' THEN
'TUES'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Wednesday' THEN
'WED'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Thursday' THEN
'THUR'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Friday' THEN
'FRI'
END as DOW,
CAST(CONVERT(int, (Freight * 100)) as VARCHAR(10)) as Freight
from Northwind.dbo.orders where employeeid = 9 order by [OrderDate] desc )

I know you can't use an ORDER BY in a subquery, UNLESS the subquery also uses a TOP n (which this one does)...but does anyone know why this isn't liking my code?

I got the select to work the way I want it to by doing the following (really UGLY) code...SELECT U.DOW, U.Freight FROM
((select
GETDATE() as [OrderDate],
CASE
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Monday' THEN
'MON'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Tuesday' THEN
'TUES'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Wednesday' THEN
'WED'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Thursday' THEN
'THUR'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Friday' THEN
'FRI'
END AS Dow, 'N/A' AS Freight )
UNION ALL
(select h.OrderDate as [OrderDate], h.DOW, h.Freight FROM
(select top 4
[OrderDate] as [OrderDate],
CASE
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Monday' THEN
'MON'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Tuesday' THEN
'TUES'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Wednesday' THEN
'WED'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Thursday' THEN
'THUR'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Friday' THEN
'FRI'
END as DOW,
CAST(CONVERT(int, (Freight * 100)) as VARCHAR(10)) as Freight
from Northwind.dbo.orders where employeeid = 9 order by [OrderDate] desc ) H)) U
order by OrderDate descbut am still confounded about why my original sub-select is rejected with such impunity.

My confusion seems likely related to understanding the set theory or basic concepts of the building of the select/Union rather than the way I am using the ORDER BY syntax, but I just can't seem to explain it to myself.

Thoughts?
Thanks!




View Complete Forum Thread with Replies
Sponsored Links:

Related Messages:
Order By In Subquery + UNION
All,I've seen several posts regarding using UNION or UNION ALL to mashtogether two or more resultsets into a single result set, but can'tseem to find enough info here to help me answer my particularquestion.I have a stored procedure that gets the column names in a particularformat (i.e. "chassis_id"|"chassis_description"|"modify_date") as wellas actual data for a given table (in a quote-separated, pipe-delimitedmanner i.e. "1"|"description for the chassis"|"2004-09-08").I'd like to get both of these resultsets and mash them together. Thisworks, but when I need to order the second resultset (i.e. select *from chassis order by chassis_id), SQL Server returns an errorcomplaining about the chassis_id column name (invalid column name'chassis_id') in the Order By clause.From what I can tell, I'm using the UNION and Order By in correctly,but I'm not sure exactly what's wrong with it. If I take out the OrderBy, everything works great. Although I would like to be able to ordermy second resultset (in the same sproc) if possible.The actual queries I'm running are actually quite long, but here's onethat's a bit shorter to help illustrate:SELECT '"app_group_id"|"app_group_name"|"create_date"|"create_by"|"modify_date"|"modify_by"'UNION ALLSELECT + ISNULL(CONVERT(varchar,app_group_id), '') + '|'+ SUBSTRING(RTRIM(LTRIM(CONVERT(varchar, 1))), 1,0)+ '"' + ISNULL(CONVERT(varchar(1000), +REPLACE(CONVERT(nvarchar(4000),app_group_name), '"', '""')), '') +'"|'+ SUBSTRING(RTRIM(LTRIM(CONVERT(varchar, 2))), 1,0)FROM app_grouporder by app_group_idThank for any help on this./bc

View Replies !   View Related
Union Or Subquery
Greetings!

I have 11 tables with identical fields :

HOSTS, OS, CLASSIFICATION, SITE

The 10 tables (Table 1, 2,..10) are meant for holding data regarding the compliance for a particular attribute. For example, all assets have to follow a naming convention, if they don't follow, they are recorded in Table 1. The same way, if they have any unacceptable os, they are recorded in table 2; and so on. There are 10 such attributes which are monitored in those respective 10 tables.
The 11th table is a Master Table that has all the hosts which is the master inventory table.
How do I write a query to get a list of all the hosts that belong to any of those 10 tables which could be appearing in 1 or more of those 10 table(s).

Thanks in advance
Miky001

View Replies !   View Related
Ordering A UNION Select With Subquery
I have a select such as this:

select COLUMNS from TABLE where WHERE_CLAUSE1
union
select COLUMNS from TABLE where WHERE_CLAUSE2

Now, I want to order the result set by COLUMNS. When I try the following query, the SQL fails.

select * from
(
select COLUMNS from TABLE where WHERE_CLAUSE1

union

select COLUMNS from TABLE where WHERE_CLAUSE2

) as T
order by COLUMNS

Any idea how this can be done?

Thanks

View Replies !   View Related
SQL Union With ORDER BY
I am having problems retrieving some data from a table,Tablename = "Magazine"ColumnsMagazineID MagazineName12 Times3 People4 National Geographic5 US6 Sports IllustratedI am trying to bind a dropdownlist in .net with the 4 newest magazinesand the empty magazine.SELECT TOP 1 MagazineID, MagazineName from MagazineUNIONSELECT TOP 4 MagazineID, MagazineName from MagazineOrder by MagazineName;The first part returns1,''The second part returns1,''2,'Times'3,'People'4,'National Geographic'Given the above data, how can I get the sql results to display5 'US'4 'National Geographic'3 'People'2 'Times'1 ''Essentially i need to do the followingSelect Top 1 MagazineID, MagazineName from Magazine Order by MagazineIDand add to itSelect Top 4 MagazineID, MagazineName from Magazine Order by MagazineIDdesc

View Replies !   View Related
Union & Order By
hello,
I have 2 tables which contain a lot of articles, and they have same structure.
what I want to do is that, select top 10 articles from each table and then union those records to another table, also I need to order these articles in desc order by their added date before i union them.

what I know is that for union sql phrase , there is only one order by is allowed, so how could I order those 2 tables before i union them.

thanks

View Replies !   View Related
UNION ALL And ORDER BYs
Hi

I have two tables which I'm combining.

Select employeeID as id, startDt as startDate from Table1
union all
Select CustomerID as id, startDt as startDate from Table2
order by startDt


This works fine, unfortunately, my problem is I only want to display the first latest customer. In a Union All, how do i distinguish whether I'm ordering the table it is trying to union or the actual unioned table tiself?

For example, this does not work.

Select employeeID as id, startDt as startDate from Table1
union all
Select top 1 CustomerID as id, startDt as startDate from Table2
order by startDt desc
order by startDt

View Replies !   View Related
How To Use UNION And 'order By' Together?
I wanted to use UNION and 'order by' in the same script but it keeps giving me error

eg;

select name,date
where name = 'sel'
union
select name,date
where name = 'ali'
order by name

I don't know where to put the 'order by'

Can anybody help me?

View Replies !   View Related
UNION: Select Order
i have 2 selects:select * from view_veiculos where nome_marc like '%fiat%' and ano='2001'union select * from view_veiculos where nome_marc like '%fiat%'when i execute it on sql server, i get the following results:id 1 _______ ano 2004id 2 _______ ano 2001the row with ano 2004 is before the row with ano 2001the problem is that id like it to be ordered following the select order, which means that 2001 should be displayed before 2004,like that:id 1 _______ ano 2001id 2 _______ ano 2004all the results from the first select from the query need to be placed before the results from the second query.how can i make it ?thanks for all

View Replies !   View Related
Union All And Order By Problem
SELECT *FROM tblCountryWHERE Country_Id = 26UNION ALLSELECT *FROM tblCountryWHERE Country_Id <26--order by country_Namei need to select country_id =26 and then the rest i want them ordered byname.if i put order by country_name, the country_id 26 isn't displayed as thefirst one.is there anyway to apply the order by only to the second select not thewhole?*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***

View Replies !   View Related
Error On Order By With Union All
Hello,

I want to order by a field that is a code, like 1,2,3,11,12,13, and i get the following error

"Only text pointers are allowed in work tables, never text, ntext, or image columns sql server"

Why do i get this, what can i do to overcome this?

Thank you

View Replies !   View Related
Can I User Union With Order By?
Hi All,
 
   I have this table in my DB.
 
ProductID | ProductSerial | Product Date
1              |FRT123           | 3/3/07
2              |EDR432          |5/5/07
 
 
I need to run two select statment on the same tabel and i Use Union to join the result comes from the first table with the one comes from the second one. but one i use order by union dose not work.
 
my question is : How Can i run the two select statment on the same table and join the results and order each select?
 
my queries:
Select ProductID,ProductSerial,ProductDate
Where productID = @ProductID
Order by ProductID
 
Union
Select ProductID,ProductSerial,ProductDate
Where productID = @ProductID
Order by ProductID

 
Thank you
Sms

View Replies !   View Related
Top Clause , Union And Order By
Hi,

I'm currently have a problem with a query using a top clause. When I run it by itself as a single query, I have no problems and the results are valid. However, if I try duplicate the query after a union clause, the order by ... desc doesn't order properly.

The following is the query I'm using along with the results. Then I'll have the query I was trying to unite and the results (date ranges selected were the same in both):

QUERY 1

select top 1 (s.ldate), v.mdtid, po.odometer, pi.odometer, (pi.odometer-po.odometer) as 'Total Miles'

from EventStrings ES

JOIN schedules s
ON ES.SchId=S.SchId
JOIN vehicles v
ON v.vehicleid=es.vehicleid
JOIN Events PO
ON PO.schid=es.schid
AND PO.EvStrId=ES.EvStrId
AND po.activity=4
JOIN Events PI
ON PI.schid=es.schid
AND PI.EvStrId=ES.EvStrId
AND pi.activity=3

WHERE es.providerid in (0,1,4)
and s.ldate>=?
and s.ldate<=?
and v.mdtid=20411

order by s.ldate desc


RESULTS 1

DATE MDT IDPU Odometer DO Odometer Total Miles
12/6/2007 2041112810.6 12874.5 63.9

QUERY 2 (with Union)

select top 1 (s.ldate), v.mdtid, po.odometer, pi.odometer, (pi.odometer-po.odometer) as 'Total Miles'

from EventStrings ES

JOIN schedules s
ON ES.SchId=S.SchId
JOIN vehicles v
ON v.vehicleid=es.vehicleid
JOIN Events PO
ON PO.schid=es.schid
AND PO.EvStrId=ES.EvStrId
AND po.activity=4
JOIN Events PI
ON PI.schid=es.schid
AND PI.EvStrId=ES.EvStrId
AND pi.activity=3

WHERE es.providerid in (0,1,4)
and s.ldate>=[From Date,Date]
and s.ldate<=[To Date,Date]
and v.mdtid=20411

Union

select top 1 (s.ldate), v.mdtid, po.odometer, pi.odometer, (pi.odometer-po.odometer) as 'Total Miles'

from EventStrings ES

JOIN schedules s
ON ES.SchId=S.SchId
JOIN vehicles v
ON v.vehicleid=es.vehicleid
JOIN Events PO
ON PO.schid=es.schid
AND PO.EvStrId=ES.EvStrId
AND po.activity=4
JOIN Events PI
ON PI.schid=es.schid
AND PI.EvStrId=ES.EvStrId
AND pi.activity=3

WHERE es.providerid in (0,1,4)
and s.ldate>=?
and s.ldate<=?
and v.mdtid=2642

order by s.ldate desc

RESULTS 2

DATE MDT ID PU OdometerDO Odometer Total Miles
4/10/2007 20411 1207.21252.5 45.3
1/2/2007 2642 193652.6193817 164.4

As you can see, the results are sorted very differently. Is there any way to have the order by apply to both queries?

Thanks!
Craig

View Replies !   View Related
Union And Order Statement
I have the following query and for some reason when I try to run it, it tells me there is an incorrect syntax near the 'union' statement. Can you tell me what is wrong with this?

SELECT MDN,
DATEPART(d,CallDate) as CallDate,
DATEPART(hh,CallDate) as Hour,
sum(ceiling((Cast(DurationSeconds as Decimal)/60))) as Minutes
FROM VoiceCallDetailRecord
WHERE DurationSeconds > 0 and CallDate >= '02/19/2007' and calldate < '03/19/2007' and COS = 3
AND (((CONVERT(varchar, CallDate, 108) Between '21:00:00' AND '23:59:59') OR (CONVERT(varchar, CallDate, 108) Between '00:00:00' AND '07:00:00'))
OR DATEPART(weekday, CallDate) in (1,7)) and NOT (Left(Endpoint,3) IN ('011')
or (Left(Endpoint,4) IN ('1340','1876','1868','1809',
'1246','1242','1780','1403',
'1250','1604','1807','1519',
'1204','1506','1709','1867',
'1902','1705','1613','1416',
'1905','1902','1514','1450',
'1418','1819','1306','1867')))
order BY DATEPART(d,CallDate), DATEPART(hh,CallDate), MDN
UNION
SELECT MDN,
DATEPART(d,CallDate) as CallDate,
DATEPART(hh,CallDate) as Hour,
sum(ceiling((Cast(DurationSeconds as Decimal)/60))) as Minutes
FROM ZeroChargeVCDRecord
WHERE DurationSeconds > 0 and CallDate >= '02/19/2007' and calldate < '03/19/2007' and COS = 3
AND (((CONVERT(varchar, CallDate, 108) Between '21:00:00' AND '23:59:59') OR (CONVERT(varchar, CallDate, 108) Between '00:00:00' AND '07:00:00'))
OR DATEPART(weekday, CallDate) in (1,7)) and NOT (Left(Endpoint,3) IN ('011')
or (Left(Endpoint,4) IN ('1340','1876','1868','1809',
'1246','1242','1780','1403',
'1250','1604','1807','1519',
'1204','1506','1709','1867',
'1902','1705','1613','1416',
'1905','1902','1514','1450',
'1418','1819','1306','1867')))
order BY DATEPART(d,CallDate), DATEPART(hh,CallDate), MDN

View Replies !   View Related
Dynamic ORDER BY And UNION
Hello,

I am trying to use dynamic ORDER BY with UNION in a stored procedure but I keep getting this error message:

ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if the statement contains a UNION, INTERSECT or EXCEPT operator.

The ORDER BY works fine without the UNION, and the UNION works fine without the dynamic ORDER BY (just putting an ORDER BY works fine)

Here is the whole query in case this helps, thank you

SELECT
leave_id, leave_type, annualLeave.from_date,
convert(nvarchar(10), annualLeave.request_date, 103) as dated,
convert(nvarchar(10), annualLeave.from_date, 103) as from_date,
convert(nvarchar(10), annualLeave.to_date, 103) as to_date,
annualLeave.canceled,
annualLeave.working_days,
staff.staff_name,
Case WHEN annualLeave.canceled = 'True' THEN 'canceledPO'
WHEN annualLeave.authorized_mng is not NUll AND annualLeave.authorized_hr is not Null THEN 'greenItem'
ELSE ''
END AS pendingStyle,
Case WHEN annualLeave.canceled = 'True' THEN 'canceledPO'
ELSE ''
END AS historyStyle
FROM annualLeave
INNER JOIN staff ON annualLeave.staff = staff.staff_id
WHERE staff.department like @Department
and (@staffID is Null or annualLeave.staff = @StaffID)
and (@Canceled is Null or annualLeave.canceled = @Canceled)
and (@AuthorizedMng is Null or annualLeave.authorized_mng is Null)
and (@AuthorizedHR is Null or annualLeave.authorized_hr is Null)
and (@StartingDate is Null or annualLeave.from_date > @Startingdate)
and (@IsPastLeave is Null or annualLeave.from_date < @IsPastLeave)
and (@EndingDate is Null or annualLeave.to_date <= @EndingDate)

UNION

SELECT
leave_id, leave_type, annualLeave.from_date,
convert(nvarchar(10), annualLeave.request_date, 103) as dated,
convert(nvarchar(10), annualLeave.from_date, 103) as from_date,
convert(nvarchar(10), annualLeave.to_date, 103) as to_date,
annualLeave.canceled,
annualLeave.working_days,
staff.staff_name,
Case WHEN annualLeave.canceled = 'True' THEN 'canceledPO'
WHEN annualLeave.authorized_mng is not NUll AND annualLeave.authorized_hr is not Null THEN 'greenItem'
ELSE ''
END AS pendingStyle,
Case WHEN annualLeave.canceled = 'True' THEN 'canceledPO'
ELSE ''
END AS historyStyle
FROM annualLeave
INNER JOIN staff ON annualLeave.staff = staff.staff_id
WHERE staff.department like @Department
and (@staffID is Null or annualLeave.staff = @StaffID)
and (@Canceled is Null or annualLeave.canceled = @Canceled)
and (@AuthorizedMng is Null or annualLeave.authorized_mng is Null)
and (@AuthorizedHR is Null or annualLeave.authorized_hr is Null)
and annualLeave.leave_type like 'Leave in lieu'
ORDER BY
CASE @OrderDir
WHEN 'ASC' THENannualLeave.from_date
END
ASC,
CASE @OrderDir
WHEN 'DESC' THEN annualLeave.from_date
END
DESC

View Replies !   View Related
ORDER BY Not Working With Subquery Value
So.. I'm trying to add up the number of wins and losses from a schedule of games and list them with their corresponding team name from another table.

Then I want to be able to sort by each teams number of wins. This is what I've got now, and it runs through without error, but it does not ORDER the list by "Wins"


strSQL = "Select *, ((SELECT Count(Win) FROM Game_Schedule WHERE Game_Schedule.T1_ID = standings.ID AND Win = true) + " & _
"(SELECT Count(Win) FROM Game_Schedule WHERE Game_Schedule.T2_ID = standings.ID AND Loss = true)) AS [Wins], " & _
"(SELECT Count(Loss) FROM Game_Schedule WHERE Game_Schedule.T1_ID = standings.ID AND Loss = true) + " & _
"(SELECT Count(Loss) FROM Game_Schedule WHERE Game_Schedule.T2_ID = standings.ID AND Win = true) AS [Losses], " & _
"(SELECT Count(Tie) FROM Game_Schedule WHERE Game_Schedule.T1_ID = standings.ID AND Tie = true OR Game_Schedule.T2_ID = standings.ID AND Tie = true) AS [Ties] FROM standings ORDER BY T_Tier, T_Name, Wins DESC"

View Replies !   View Related
UNION With Dynamic Order By Failing
Hi,
Can anyone help as to how to get this to work? dbo.parseInt is a Function which sorts Alpha Numerically. If I removed the top part of the UNION, the Procedure works fine.

ALTER PROCEDURE dbo.ByJobNoAlphaNumeric as
SELECT 0 AS JobID, '<All Jobs>' AS JobNo
UNION SELECT JobID, JobNo FROM tbl
ORDER BY dbo.parseInt(JobNo)

Regards
Andrew

View Replies !   View Related
[ Resolved ] Union, Each Query W/ Own Order By
I am trying to combine 2 queries, each with their own 'order by' and I am having trouble.

This is just an example, not what I'm trying to do, my query is more elaberate but looks simular to this.

SELECT TOP 10 *, 'FieldA' AS SortedBy
FROM TableA
Order By FieldA Desc
UNION ALL
SELECT TOP 10 Precent *, 'FieldB' AS SortedBy
FROM TableA
Order By FieldB Asc


Anyway not to get the following error?
Server: Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 34
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'UNION'.

View Replies !   View Related
Limit And Order In Union Statement
hi all,

i have the following union statement, which works like a charm:SELECT [Name], [EventID] AS [ItemID], [TourID], [Date], NULL AS [StartDate], [Date] AS [SortDate], [Type] FROM [Events] WHERE [TourID] IS NULL AND AccessLevel <= @AuthenticationLevel UNION SELECT [Name], [TourID] AS [ItemID], [TourID], NULL AS [Date], [StartDate], [StartDate] AS [SortDate], '2' AS [Type] FROM [Tours]WHERE AccessLevel <= @AuthenticationLevel ORDER BY [SortDate]

now i want to ad a limit to this statement, but i can't get it working. i have tried this:SELECT * FROM (SELECT [Name], [EventID] AS [ItemID], [TourID], [Date], NULL AS [StartDate], [Date] AS [SortDate], [Type] FROM [Events] WHERE [TourID] IS NULL AND AccessLevel <= @AuthenticationLevel UNION SELECT [Name], [TourID] AS [ItemID], [TourID], NULL AS [Date], [StartDate], [StartDate] AS [SortDate], '2' AS [Type] FROM [Tours]WHERE AccessLevel <= @AuthenticationLevel) ORDER BY [SortDate] LIMIT 2
but i keep getting an error message saying "Incorrect syntax near the keyword "ORDER". what am i doing wrong?

-bm

View Replies !   View Related
Writing Union Statement With 2 Order By's
Hi,

I'm trying to write a UNION statement with 2 selects and can't figure out for the life of me how to do it.


select top 10 * from tblusers ORDER BY dateJoined
UNION
select top 10 * from tblusers ORDER BY lastLogin

The union works fine without the order by's, but I really need the order by's in there and I don't understand why its so difficult to do. Surely there must be some other strategy?


Any help is much appreciated.. thanks!!
mike123

How can I reproduce this results ?

View Replies !   View Related
Multiple Order By Statements In Union Select
I'm new to SQL stored procedures, but I'm looking to be able to select order by statement.

declare @OrderBy
@OrderBy = 'first_name'

Select first_name,last_name from table1
Union
Select first_name,last_name from table2

if @OrderBy = 'first_name' begin
Order By first_name
else
Order By last_name
end

You'll have to excuse my if statement if the syntax is incorrect (used to only writing asp ifs :P). Thanks for any help

View Replies !   View Related
Order Converted Dates In Union Query
I have the following as part of a union query:

CONVERT(CHAR(8), r.RRDate, 1) AS [Date]

I also want to order by date but when I do that it doesn't order correctly because of the conversion to char data type (for example, it puts 6/15/05 before 9/22/04 because it only looks at the first number(s) and not the year).  If I try to cast it back to smalldatetime in the order by clause it tells me that ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if the statement contains a UNION operator.  I get the same message if I try putting just "r.RRDate" in the ORDER BY clause.  It's not that big of a deal - I can lose the formatting on the date if I need to to get it to sort correctly, but this query gets used frequently and I'd like to keep the formatting if possible.

Thanks,

Dave

 

View Replies !   View Related
Query Multiple Tables - Union/Order By
Hi!

I'm trying to get the results from three different tables, where they have some of the same results. I'm only interested in where they match and then trying to order by date (that's in three columns - M, D, Y). I read previous post in 9/07 but the result doesn't seem to order correctly. It does not have any rhyme or reason to the outputed results as it bounces back and forth through Oct, Nov and Dec posting and throughout all three tables. Here's my query below. Any ideas how I can get my ordering correct for all three tables to display all Oct, all Nov and all Dec?

Thanks so much

select date3, date2, date1, who, what
from
(
select date3, date2, date1, who, what from shows
union
select date3, date2, date1, who, what from shares
union
select date3, date2, date1, who, what from soiree
)
a order by date3, date2, date1

View Replies !   View Related
Returning In Table Called Order Using UNION
Hello again,

I am using UNION to return these 2 tables:

TableA
QID Q
1 Name?
2 Age?
3 Phone?

TableB
QID Q
1 DogName?
2 CatName?


When I use the following query;
SELECT * FROM TableA UNION SELECT * FROM TableB

I get the following return:
QID Q
1 whateverquestions
1
2
2
3

but I wish it to return in order of table invoke:
QID
1
2
3
1
2


Is that possible? (by not changing QID)

Cheers,

James

View Replies !   View Related
Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &<, &<= , &>, &>= Or When The Subquery Is Used As An Expression.
hello friends.. I am newbie for sql server...I having a problem when executing this procedure .... ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spgetvalues]    @Uid intASBEGIN    SET NOCOUNT ON;        select                                  DATEPART(year, c.fy)as fy,                                                (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like 'Retire-Plan B-1%      JRF' ) as survivorship,                (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like  'Gross Earnings' and ) as ytdgross,                (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like 'Retire-Plan B-1.5%      JRP') as totalcontrib,                                                       from    wh_contribute c                       where    c.uid=@Uid                 Order by fy Asc .....what is the wrong here??  " Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression."please reply asap... 

View Replies !   View Related
Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &<, &<= , &>, &>= Or When The Subquery Is Used As An Expression.
Hi,Urgent Help appreciated....I am getting resultset with first condition and when try to get theresutlset from second condition i am getting the above error inSQL200.I know that i am getting more then one value in the second conditionbut even i am getting more then one value in my first statement........i tried taking out '=' replacing 'in' it is not working pls needuregent help......CREATE proc sp_count_AllNewsPapers@CustomerId intasdeclare @NewsId intset @NewsId = (select NewsDelId from NewsDelivery whereCustomerId=@CustomerId )if not exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count( NewsPapersId) from NewsPapersendif exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count(NewsDelId) from NewsDelivery whereCustomerid=@CustomeridendGO

View Replies !   View Related
Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &<, &<= , &>, &>= Or When The Subquery Is Used As An Expression.
Hi,Urgent Help appreciated....I am getting resultset with first condition and when try to get theresutlset from second condition i am getting the above error inSQL200.I know that i am getting more then one value in the second conditionbut even i am getting more then one value in my first statement........i tried taking out '=' replacing 'in' it is not working pls needuregent help......CREATE proc sp_count_AllNewsPapers@CustomerId intasdeclare @NewsId intset @NewsId = (select NewsDelId from NewsDelivery whereCustomerId=@CustomerId )if not exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count( NewsPapersId) from NewsPapersendif exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count(NewsDelId) from NewsDelivery whereCustomerid=@CustomeridendGO

View Replies !   View Related
Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &<, &<= , &>, &>= Or When The Subquery Is Used As An Expression.
I am getting 2 resultsets depending on conditon, In the secondconditon i am getting the above error could anyone help me..........CREATE proc sp_count_AllNewsPapers@CustomerId intasdeclare @NewsId intset @NewsId = (select NewsDelId from NewsDelivery whereCustomerId=@CustomerId )if not exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count( NewsPapersId) from NewsPapersendif exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count(NewsDelId) from NewsDelivery whereCustomerid=@CustomeridendGO

View Replies !   View Related
Sequence Clustering Model Processing Fails Due To Sort Order
 
I am using Sequence Clustering algorithm. (I've built several models with Clustering algorithm and Decision Trees for this client, which work fine.).
 
Background: Sequence data must be stored in a nested table, which can have only 1 non-key attribute.
I specify a mining model structure with the nested table key as the datetime, and the nested table discrete prediction column as [sort name] . this builds the model fine.
 
 
When I try to process this data mining model, I get Process failed: "Errors in the OLAP storage engine: The sort order specified for distinct count records is incorrect".
 
Iit may be that OLAP distinct count requests numerical data type, but not from the examples I've seen. Tried this anyway €“ doesn€™t work on numeric either €“ same problem.
 Any Suggestions?

View Replies !   View Related
Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &&<, &&<= , &&>, &&>= Or When The Subquery I
Hi,

I've running the below query for months ans suddenly today started getting the following error :"Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression."

Any ideas as to why??

SELECT     t0.DocNum, t0.Status, t0.ItemCode, t0.Warehouse, t0.OriginNum, t0.U_SOLineNo, ORDR.NumAtCard, ORDR.CardCode, OITM_1.U_Cultivar,
                      RDR1.U_Variety,
                          (SELECT     OITM.U_Variety
                            FROM          OWOR INNER JOIN
                                                   WOR1 ON OWOR.DocEntry = WOR1.DocEntry INNER JOIN
                                                   OITM INNER JOIN
                                                   OITB ON OITM.ItmsGrpCod = OITB.ItmsGrpCod ON WOR1.ItemCode = OITM.ItemCode
                            WHERE      (OITB.ItmsGrpNam = 'Basic Fruit') AND (OWOR.DocNum = t0.DocNum)) AS Expr1, OITM_1.U_Organisation, OITM_1.U_Commodity,
                      OITM_1.U_Pack, OITM_1.U_Grade, RDR1.U_SizeCount, OITM_1.U_InvCode, OITM_1.U_Brand, OITM_1.U_PalleBase, OITM_1.U_Crt_Pallet,
                      OITM_1.U_LabelType, RDR1.U_DEPOT, OITM_1.U_PLU, RDR1.U_Trgt_Mrkt, RDR1.U_Wrap_Type, ORDR.U_SCCode
FROM         OWOR AS t0 INNER JOIN
                      ORDR ON t0.OriginNum = ORDR.DocNum INNER JOIN
                      RDR1 ON ORDR.DocEntry = RDR1.DocEntry AND t0.U_SOLineNo - 1 = RDR1.LineNum INNER JOIN
                      OITM AS OITM_1 ON t0.ItemCode = OITM_1.ItemCode
WHERE     (t0.Status <> 'L')

Thanks

Jacquues

View Replies !   View Related
Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &&<, &&<= , &&>, &&>= Or When The Subquery I
I am getting an error as

Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 1

Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.

 while running the following query.

 



SELECT DISTINCT EmployeeDetails.FirstName+' '+EmployeeDetails.LastName AS EmpName,

LUP_FIX_DeptDetails.DeptName AS CurrentDepartment,

LUP_FIX_DesigDetails.DesigName AS CurrentDesignation,

LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.ProjectName AS CurrentProject,

ManagerName=(SELECT E.FirstName+' '+E.LastName

FROM EmployeeDetails E

INNER JOIN LUP_EmpProject

ON E.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid

INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails

ON LUP_EmpProject.Projectid = LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Projectid

WHERE LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Managerid = E.Empid)



FROM EmployeeDetails

INNER JOIN LUP_EmpDepartment

ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDepartment.Empid

INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_DeptDetails

ON LUP_EmpDepartment.Deptid=LUP_FIX_DeptDetails.Deptid

AND LUP_EmpDepartment.Date=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpDepartment.Date

FROM LUP_EmpDepartment

WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDepartment.Empid

ORDER BY LUP_EmpDepartment.Date DESC)

INNER JOIN LUP_EmpDesignation

ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDesignation.Empid

INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_DesigDetails

ON LUP_EmpDesignation.Desigid=LUP_FIX_DesigDetails.Desigid

AND LUP_EmpDesignation.Date=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpDesignation.Date

FROM LUP_EmpDesignation

WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDesignation.Empid

ORDER BY LUP_EmpDesignation.Date DESC)

INNER JOIN LUP_EmpProject

ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid

AND LUP_EmpProject.StartDate=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpProject.StartDate

FROM LUP_EmpProject

WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid

ORDER BY LUP_EmpProject.StartDate DESC)

INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails

ON LUP_EmpProject.Projectid=LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Projectid



WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=1
 
PLEASE HELP.................

View Replies !   View Related
Insert Using Subquery Fails To Insert With No Error
I am working with parent child tables and want to populate the primary key on insert so that the user does not have to enter this for each record.  Here is my codeInsertCommand="INSERT INTO [Awards] ([UFID], [DateAwarded], [Amount], [AwardingAgency]) Select UFID, @DateAwarded, @Amount, @AwardingAgency from master where GatorlinkName = @LoginName"  <InsertParameters><asp:Parameter Name="LoginName" Type="String" />         <asp:Parameter Name="strusername" Type="String" />            <asp:Parameter Name="UFID" Type="String" />            <asp:Parameter Name="DateAwarded" Type="DateTime" />            <asp:Parameter Name="Amount" Type="Decimal" />            <asp:Parameter Name="AwardingAgency" Type="String" />        </InsertParameters> The UFID field is the only field that should be populated from SQL data the others are coming from a form view insert form.  When I run an insert I get no error but the insert does not happen. I know that the @LoginName works since I am using this same logic in my select statement.  Thanks in advance for your help,Ken 

View Replies !   View Related
Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value But Work FINE (field_xxx=subquery)
Hi guys,

 

A have a problem that I need understand.... I have 2 server with the same configuration...

 

SERVER01:

-----------------------------------------------------

Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2191 (Intel IA-64)

Mar 27 2006 11:51:52

Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation

Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)

 

sp_dboption 'BB_XXXXX'

The following options are set:

-----------------------------------

trunc. log on chkpt.

auto create statistics

auto update statistics

********************************

SERVER02:

-----------------------------------------------------

Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2191 (Intel IA-64)

Mar 27 2006 11:51:52

Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation

Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)



sp_dboption 'BB_XXXXX'

The following options are set:

-----------------------------------

trunc. log on chkpt.

auto create statistics

auto update statistics

 

OK, the problem is that if a run the below query in server01, i get error 512:

 

Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 1

Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.

 

But, if run the same query in the server02, the query work fine -.

 

I know that I can use IN, EXISTS, TOP, etc ... but I need understand this behavior.

 

Any idea WHY?

 

SELECT dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.dt_saldo,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_indice_opf,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_classificacao,

dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao ds_tipo_transacao_movimento ,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao ds_tipo_transacao_header,

'SD' ds_status_operacao,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_opcao ,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.id_empresa,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.ic_empresa_cliente,

0 vl_entrada_compra_ctro ,0 vl_entrada_compra_premio,

0 vl_entrada_venda_ctro , 0 vl_entrada_venda_premio,

0 vl_saida_compra_ctro, 0 vl_saida_compra_premio,

0 vl_saida_venda_ctro, 0 vl_saida_venda_premio,

0 vl_lucro , 0 vl_prejuizo, 0 vl_naoexec_contrato,

0 vl_naoexec_premio,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_aprop_ganho) vl_aprop_ganho,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_aprop_perda) vl_aprop_perda,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_rever_ganho) vl_rever_ganho,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_rever_perda) vl_rever_perda,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_irrf) vl_irrf

FROM dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx,

dbo.opf_header_operacao ,

dbo.opf_movimento_operacao

WHERE dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.dt_saldo = '6-29-2007 0:0:0.000'

and ( dbo.opf_header_operacao.no_contrato = dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.no_contrato )

and ( dbo.opf_header_operacao.no_contrato = dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.no_contrato )

and ( dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.dt_pregao = (select (o.dt_pregao) from dbo.opf_movimento_operacao o

where o.no_contrato = dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.no_contrato and o.dt_pregao <='6-28-2007 0:0:0.000' ) )

and (dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.ic_tipo_saldo = 'S')

group by dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.dt_saldo,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_indice_opf,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_classificacao,

dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao ,

ds_status_operacao,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_opcao ,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.id_empresa,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.ic_empresa_cliente

 

Thanks

Nilton Pinheiro

View Replies !   View Related
How Does &&"union/union All&&" Work Inside SQL Server?
 

Why the sequence different?
 
 

select * from (

select id=3,[name]='Z'

union all select 1,'G'

union all select 2,'R'

union all select 4,'Z'

) as t

order by [name]

--result:

---------

--1 G

--2 R

--4 Z

--3 Z

select * from (

select id=3,[name]='Z'

union select 1,'G'

union all select 2,'R'

union all select 4,'Z'

) as t

order by [name]

--result:

----------

--1 G

--2 R

--3 Z--changed

--4 Z

View Replies !   View Related
Union All Does Not Union All Rows
Hi all,

I have a Union All transformation with 4 inputs and one output when I debug the package the sum of the different inputs rows does not match the row count in output.

I don't understand, I've used the Union All transform many times and I've never seen this.

Any idea why this could happen ?  

View Replies !   View Related
Express Will Not Load. Insurmountable Difficulties With Order Of Uninstalls/order Of Installs/ Suggestions Plz
Finding the "pieces of information" I need to successfully install the SQL Server Express edition is so complex.  Uninstalls do "not" really uninstall completely, leading to failure of SQL install.  Can you suggest a thorough, one-stop site for directions for the order of app uninstalls and then the order for app installs for the following...

SQL Server Express edition

Visual Studios 2005

Jet 4.0 newest upgrade

.Net Framework 2.0 (or should I use 3.0)

VS2005 Security upgrade

Anything else I need for just creating a database for my VS2005 Visual Basic project?

I was trying to use MS Access as my backend db but would like to try SQL Express

 

Thank you, Mark

 

 

 

View Replies !   View Related
Default Sort Order - Open Table - Select Without Order By
Hi!
 
I recently run into a senario when a procedure quiered a table without a order by clause. Luckily it retrived data in the prefered order.
 
The table returns the data in the same order in SQL Manager "Open Table"
 
So I started to wonder what deterimins the sort order when there is no order by clause ?
 
I researched this for a bit but found no straight answers. My table has no PK, but an identiy column.
 
Peace.
 
/P

View Replies !   View Related
How To Add Order Item Into A Purchase Order Using A Stored Procedure/Trigger?
Hey guys, i need to find out how can i add order items under a Purchase Order number.
My table relationship is PurchaseOrder ->PurchaseOrderItem.
 
below is a Stored Procedure that i have wrote in creating a PO:



CREATE PROC spCreatePO (@SupplierID SmallInt, @date datetime, @POno SmallInt OUTPUT)

AS

BEGIN

INSERT INTO PurchaseOrder (PurchaseOrderDate, SupplierID) VALUES(@date, @SupplierID)

END



SET @POno = @@IDENTITY

RETURN

 
However, how do i make it that  it will automatically adds item under the POno being gernerated? can i use a trigger so that whenever a Insert for PO is success, it automaticallys proceed to adding the items into the table PurcahseOrderItem?
 

CREATE TRIGGER trgInsertPOItem

ON PurchaseOrderItem

FOR INSERT

AS

BEGIN


'What do i entered???'
END

RETURN

 
help is needed asap! thanks!

View Replies !   View Related
Find Order By Date Range Or Order Id
hi basically what i have is 3 text boxes. one for start date, one for end date and one for order id, i also have this bit of SQL
SelectCommand="SELECT [Order_ID], [Customer_Id], [Date_ordered], [status] FROM [tbl_order]WHERE (([Date_ordered] >= @Date_ordered OR @Date_ordered IS NULL) AND ([Date_ordered] <= @Date_ordered2 OR @Date_ordered2 IS NULL OR (Order_ID=ISNULL(@OrderID_ID,Order_ID) OR @Order_ID IS NULL))">
 but the problem is it does not seem to work! i am not an SQL guru but i cant figure it out, someone help me please!
Thanks
Jez

View Replies !   View Related
Recordset's Order And Database's Physical Order?
Hi,guys!I have a table below:CREATE TABLE rsccategory(categoryid NUMERIC(2) IDENTITY(1,1),categoryname VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,PRIMARY KEY(categoryid))Then I do:INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('url')INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('document')INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('book')INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('software')INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('casus')INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('project')INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('disert')Then SELECT * FROM rsccategory in ,I can get a recordeset with the'categoryid' in order(1,2,3,4,5,6,7)But If I change the table definition this way:categoryname VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL UNIQUE,The select result is in this order (3,5,7,2,6,4,1),and 'categoryname 'in alphabetic.Q:why the recordset's order is not the same as the first time since'categoryid' is clustered indexed.If I change the table definition again:categoryname VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL UNIQUE CLUSTEREDthe result is the same as the first time.Q:'categoryname' is clustered indexed this time,why isn't in alphabeticorder?I am a newbie in ms-sqlserver,or actually in database,and I do havesought for the answer for some time,but more confused,Thanks for yourkind help in advance!

View Replies !   View Related
Default Sort Order When Order By Column Value Are All The Same
Hi,
We got a problem.
supposing we have a table like this:

CREATE TABLE a (
aId int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
aName string2 NOT NULL
)
go
ALTER TABLE a ADD
CONSTRAINT PK_a PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (aId)
go


insert into a values ('bank of abcde');
insert into a values ('bank of abcde');
...
... (20 times)

select top 5 * from a order by aName
Result is:
6Bank of abcde
5Bank of abcde
4Bank of abcde
3Bank of abcde
2Bank of abcde

select top 10 * from a order by aName
Result is:
11Bank of abcde
10Bank of abcde
9Bank of abcde
8Bank of abcde
7Bank of abcde
6Bank of abcde
5Bank of abcde
4Bank of abcde
3Bank of abcde
2Bank of abcde

According to this result, user see the first 5 records with id 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 in page 1, but when he tries to view page 2, he still see the records with id 6, 5, 4, 3, 2. This is not correct for users. :eek:

Of course we can add order by aid also, but there are tons of sqls like this, we can't update our application in one shot.

So I ask for your advice here, is there any settings can tell the db use default sort order when the order by column value are the same? Or is there any other solution to resolve this problem in one shot?

View Replies !   View Related
Default Sort Order When The Order By Column Value Are All The Same
Hi,
   We got a problem.
   supposing we have a table like this:
 
CREATE TABLE a (
    aId             int         IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
    aName           string2     NOT NULL
)
go
ALTER TABLE a ADD
    CONSTRAINT PK_a PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (aId)
go

insert into a values ('bank of abcde');
insert into a values ('bank of abcde');
...
... (20 times)
 
select top 5 * from a order by aName
Result is:
6 Bank of abcde
5 Bank of abcde
4 Bank of abcde
3 Bank of abcde
2 Bank of abcde
 
select top 10 * from a order by aName
Result is:
11  Bank of abcde
10  Bank of abcde
9    Bank of abcde
8    Bank of abcde
7    Bank of abcde
6    Bank of abcde
5    Bank of abcde
4    Bank of abcde
3    Bank of abcde
2    Bank of abcde
 
According to this result, user see the first 5 records with id 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 in page 1, but when he tries to view page 2, he still see the records with id 6, 5, 4, 3, 2. This is not correct for users.
Of course we can add order by aid also, but there are tons of sqls like this, we can't update our application in one shot.
So I ask for your advice here, is there any settings can tell the db use default sort order when the order by column value are the same? Or is there any other solution to resolve this problem in one shot?

View Replies !   View Related
Inconsistent Sort Order Using ORDER BY Clause
I am getting the resultset sorted differently if I use a column number in the ORDER BY clause instead of a column name.

Product: Microsoft SQL Server Express Edition
Version: 9.00.1399.06
Server Collation: SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS

for example,

create table test_sort
( description varchar(75) );

insert into test_sort values('Non-A');
insert into test_sort values('Non-O');
insert into test_sort values('Noni');
insert into test_sort values('Nons');

then execute the following selects:
select
*
from
test_sort
order by
cast( 1 as nvarchar(75));

select
*
from
test_sort
order by
cast( description as nvarchar(75));

Resultset1
----------
Non-A
Non-O
Noni
Nons

Resultset2
----------
Non-A
Noni
Non-O
Nons


Any ideas?

View Replies !   View Related
Order By Clause In View Doesn't Order.
I have created view by jaoining two table and have order by clause.

The sql generated is as follows

SELECT     TOP (100) PERCENT dbo.UWYearDetail.*,  dbo.UWYearGroup.*
FROM         dbo.UWYearDetail INNER JOIN
                      dbo.UWYearGroup ON dbo.UWYearDetail.UWYearGroupId = dbo.UWYearGroup.UWYearGroupId
ORDER BY dbo.UWYearDetail.PlanVersionId, dbo.UWYearGroup.UWFinancialPlanSegmentId, dbo.UWYearGroup.UWYear, dbo.UWYearGroup.MandDFlag,
                      dbo.UWYearGroup.EarningsMethod, dbo.UWYearGroup.EffectiveMonth

 

If I run sql the results are displayed in proper order but the view only order by first item in order by clause.

Has somebody experience same thing? How to fix this issue?

Thanks,

 

View Replies !   View Related
Package Fails When I Use ODBC Connection (Fails On SQL Server Agent, OK In Visual Studio)
I did a small package with only one ODBC connection (Merant 3.70 32-Bit Progess).  This package runs well in Visual Studio and fails when runs by SQL Server Agent.

Configuration:

SQL Server Agent on a 32Bit server. 

The ODBC connection configuration in available on System DSN on this server.

The user of Server Agent have full access (Admin).

Connect Manager Provider: ".Net ProvidersOdbc Data Provider"

SQL Server version: 9.0.3042

 

Error Message:

Executed as user: TEKCON cadmin. ...ion 9.00.3042.00 for 32-bit  Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1984-2005. All rights reserved.    Started:  16:50:33  Error: 2007-06-11 16:50:33.62     Code: 0xC0047062     Source: Data Flow Task DataReader Source [1]     Description: System.Data.Odbc.OdbcException: ERROR [HYC00] [MERANT][ODBC PROGRESS driver]Optional feature not implemented.  ERROR [HY000] [MERANT][ODBC PROGRESS driver]msgOpen: unable to open message file: PROMSGS  ERROR [IM006] [MERANT][ODBC PROGRESS driver]Driver's SQLSetConnectAttr failed.  ERROR [HYC00] [MERANT][ODBC PROGRESS driver]Optional feature not implemented.  ERROR [HY000] [MERANT][ODBC PROGRESS driver]msgOpen: unable to open message file: PROMSGS  ERROR [IM006] [MERANT][ODBC PROGRESS driver]Driver's SQLSetConnectAttr failed.     at System.Data.Odbc.OdbcConnection.HandleError(OdbcHandle hrHandle, RetCode retcode)     at System.Data.Odbc.OdbcConnectionHandle..ctor(OdbcConnection connection, OdbcCon...  The package execution fa...  The step failed.


I created a .bat file with this instruction and It's run well:

dtexec /f "C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90DTSPackagesIntegration Services Project estcom.dtsx"
pause

Why it's not running with SQL Server Agent???

View Replies !   View Related
SQL To Order Results In Predefined Order
I have a DB with items which can have lengths from 0 to 400 meter.In my resultset I want to show the items with length 1-400 meter and then the results with length 0 meterHow to build my SQL?

View Replies !   View Related
Specify Order For Select Results, Order By: Help!
Lets say I have a table named [Leadership] and I want to select the field 'leadershipName' from the [Leadership] Table.

My query would look something like this:

Select leadershipName
From Leadership

Now, I would like to order the results of this query... but I don't want to simply order them by ASC or DESC. Instead, I need to order them as follows:

Executive Board Members, Delegates, Grievance Chairs, and Negotiators

My question: Can this be done through MS SQL or do I need to add a field to my [Leadership] table named 'leadershipImportance' or something as an integer to denote the level of importance of the position so that I can order on that value ASC or DESC?

Thanks,

Zoop

View Replies !   View Related
Order ID For Latest Order For Every Customer
Hi!
For the Orders table (let's assume for the Northwind database), I'm trying
to get the order id of the latest order for every customer.
That means that the result should be one record per customer and that would
display CustomerID and OrderID.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Assaf

View Replies !   View Related
In-Order/Level Order Etc. Traversal Using CTE
Hi,
 
I have some hierarchical data in a table. Say for example:
 
Parent     Child
------------------------
NULL        1

1              2

1              3

2              4

2              5

3              6

3              7

5              8

5              9

7              10

7              11

11            12

11            13

 
Now I want to be able to use CTE's to be able to traverse this tree in
1) level by level order 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10....
2) in order 1,2,4,5,8,9,3,6,7,10,11,12,13...
 
What would be the aueries for this. Using the following i get: 1,2,3,6,7,10,11,12,13,4,5,8,9 (interesting and potentially useful) but I would like to be able to experiment with the aforementioned orders as well.
 

with Tree (id)

as

(

select id from WithTest

where parent is null

union all

select a.id

from Tree b join WithTest a

on b.id = a.parent



)

select * from Tree

 
Any ideas? Thanks.

View Replies !   View Related
How To Load A Unicode File Into The Database In The Same Order As The File Order
The data file is a simple Unicode file with lines of text. BCPapparently doesn't guarantee this ordering, and neither does theimport tool. I want to be able to load the data either sequentially oradd line numbering to large Unicode file (1 million lines). I don'twant to deal with another programming language if possible and Iwonder if there's a trick in SQL Server to get this accomplished.Thanks for any help.Mark Leary----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

View Replies !   View Related

Copyright © 2005-08 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved