MS SQL Server :: Question About Where Clause In A Select

Is It Possible To Re-reference A Column Alias From A Select Clause In Another Column Of The Same Select Clause?
Example, suppose you have these 2 tables(NOTE: My example is totally different, but I'm simply trying to setupthe a simpler version, so excuse the bad design; not the point here)CarsSold {CarsSoldID int (primary key)MonthID intDealershipID intNumberCarsSold int}Dealership {DealershipID int, (primary key)SalesTax decimal}so you may have many delearships selling cars the same month, and youwanted a report to sum up totals of all dealerships per month.select cs.MonthID,sum(cs.NumberCarsSold) as 'TotalCarsSoldInMonth',sum(cs.NumberCarsSold) * d.SalesTax as 'TotalRevenue'from CarsSold csjoin Dealership d on d.DealershipID = cs.DealershipIDgroup by cs.MonthIDMy question is, is there a way to achieve something like this:select cs.MonthID,sum(cs.NumberCarsSold) as 'TotalCarsSoldInMonth',TotalCarsSoldInMonth * d.SalesTax as 'TotalRevenue'from CarsSold csjoin Dealership d on d.DealershipID = cs.DealershipIDgroup by cs.MonthIDNotice the only difference is the 3rd column in the select. Myparticular query is performing some crazy math and the only way I knowof how to get it to work is to copy and past the logic which isgetting out way out of hand...Thanks,Dave

View Replies !

SELECT Then DELETE Versus Extra Clause In SELECT
Far below (in section "original 3 steps"), you see the following:1. a temp table is created2. some data is inserted into this table3. some of the inserted data is removed based on a join with the sametable that the original select was made fromIn my opinion, there is no way that the join could produce more rowsthan were originally retrieved from viewD. Hence, we could get rid ofthe DELETE step by simply changing the query to be:INSERT INTO #details ( rec_id, orig_corr, bene_corr )SELECT rec_id, 0, 0FROM viewDWHERE SOURCE_SYS NOT IN ( 'G', 'K' )AND MONTH( VALUE_DATE_A8 ) = MONTH( @date )AND YEAR( VALUE_DATE_A8 ) = YEAR( @date )AND INMESS NOT LIKE '2__' ---- the added line===== original 3 steps (mentioned above) =====CREATE TABLE #details (rec_id UNIQUEIDENTIFIER PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,orig VARCHAR(35) NULL,bene VARCHAR(35) NULL,orig_corr TINYINT NULL,bene_corr TINYINT NULL)INSERT INTO #details ( rec_id, orig_corr, bene_corr )SELECT rec_id, 0, 0FROM viewDWHERE SOURCE_SYS NOT IN ( 'G', 'K' )AND MONTH( VALUE_DATE_A8 ) = MONTH( @date )AND YEAR( VALUE_DATE_A8 ) = YEAR( @date )DELETE dFROM #details dJOIN viewD v ON ( d.rec_id = v.rec_id )WHERE INMESS LIKE '2__'

View Replies !

Expression Defined In SELECT Clause Overwrites Column Defined In FROM Clause
2 examples:

1) Rows ordered using textual id rather than numeric id

Code Snippet
select
cast(v.id as nvarchar(2)) id
from
(
  select 1 id
  union select 2 id
  union select 11 id
) v
order by
v.id

Result set is ordered as: 1, 11, 2
I expect: 1,2,11

if renamed or removed alias for "cast(v.id as nvarchar(2))" expression then all works fine.

2) SQL server reject query below with next message

Server: Msg 169, Level 15, State 3, Line 16
A column has been specified more than once in the order by list. Columns in the order by list must be unique.

Code Snippet
select
cast(v.id as nvarchar(2)) id
from
(
  select 1 id
  union select 2 id
  union select 11 id
) v
cross join (
  select 1 id
  union select 2 id
  union select 11 id
) u
order by
v.id
    ,u.id

Again, if renamed or removed alias for "cast(v.id as nvarchar(2))" expression then all works fine.

It reproducible on

Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039 (Intel X86)   May 3 2005 23:18:38   Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)

and

Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.3042.00 (Intel X86)   Feb 9 2007 22:47:07   Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)

In both cases database collation is SQL_Latin1_General_CP1251_CS_AS

If I check quieries above on database with SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS collation then it works fine again.

Could someone clarify - is it bug or expected behaviour?

View Replies !

Select With IN Clause
Hi SQL Experts,

i have a strange problem

i have a variable which stores some values(ID) with single quote (so that i can use directlt inside the IN Clause of SELECT

Declare @DMSIDs AS VARCHAR(1000) -- variable declare,

Select @DMSIDs = '''DMS00046847'',''DMS00048305''' -- for test putting 2 correct values with escape characters

Select * from issue where id in (@DMSIDs) -- valid statment, but does not return any data
Select * from issue where id in ('DMS00046847','DMS00048305') -- same above constant value this returns data, but putting the values in varaible then trying fails.

The reason is i have a master table called issue and have another table [delta] where a particular column will store all the ID's of the issue table comma separated with single quote and i wanted to use something like below in my actual application

Select * from issue where ID in (Select distinct delta_ID from Delta_branch where date = getdate())
but since the above example with variable is not returning any data i wonder if such is possible in any other ways.

thank you for reading and helping me.

View Replies !

Select To Clause
I'm having trouble using the To clause in my select statement. The following errs out with

Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'to'.

use pubs

select

*

from

view_Rates to 'c: est.csv'

I also tried this and got same error:

use pubs

select

*

to 'c: est.csv'

from

view_Rates

View Replies !

How SELECT In WHERE Clause Works?
Please help
I'm trying to do a select command but doesn't return any record
I have two tables one is "lists" another one is "list_records"
in the liss table I have 4 records and in the list_records I have only one record which is tell who is already visited the site so I created a query to get people who is NOT visited the site

Here is my query (I got 0 record return)

SELECT *FROM lists
list_reccords
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT *
                                                  FROM lists,
                                                    list_records                                       WHERE list_records.is_visited = 1
                                             AND lists.list_id = list_records.list_id)

View Replies !

Insert Into ....... Select Clause
Hi,
I have a question about Insert into .....
Select clause in a SP. I need to insert some rows into a temperary table in a specific order. For example,
insert into #TempTable
{
.......
........
}
Select * from products order by @SortBy @SortDirection.
//
First of all, the order by clause does not take
variables. I have tried to use
declare @query varchar (1000)
set @query = 'Select * from products order by " + @SortBy + ' ' + @SortDirection
exec (@query)
//
However, I get an error message because I should supply a Select statement.
How can I solve this problem??

Thanks for your help!

View Replies !

Using @column For Where Clause In Select
Hi,

I want to do something like

"select range from mytable where @ColumnToUse = 1" then
"select range from mytable where @ColumnToUse = 2" etc.

and @columnToUse lists a different column heading each time. I know I can put this into an "exec ('select range...')" type statement, but it's really helpful if I don't evaluate all my variables at this stage in my scripts. Can anyone help?

THanks
Dan

View Replies !

Problems With Select Clause With Except?
Hi there,

I'm preparing a query and am having problems displaying the right content.

There is only one table i am dealing with, however there are 2 fields that a check needs to be made on to see if they exist or not.

Working portion of the query:
SELECT *
FROM tblVehicles
WHERE (Make = 'audi') AND (Model = 'A4') AND (YearRange = '02-05') AND (SubModel = '3.0L') AND (Factory_Wheel_Diameter = '17')

this returns 2 records:
record 1
74, AUDI, A4, 3.0L, 02-05, fwd and 4X4, 17, 5-112, 16,X43659,19, null, null, null, 16, AVW659A(9), 219
record 2
73, AUDI, A4, 3.0L, 02-05, fwd and 4X4, 17, 5-112, null, null, null, null, null,null,17, AVW759A(9), 219

the second record is the one i need to have eliminated.
i have tired adding: and (MAW_Wheel is not null) and (OEMWheel is not null) to my sql statement, but this returns no records. I have also tried using the except, not in, etc..

Seems like i need to combine those 2 values and select records when those 2 values are not both null only, but no matter what I try, i get it wrong.

Can anyone point me in the right direction?

Thanks,

View Replies !

Using Greater Than '&>' In SELECT Clause
Here is the first part of a query for MySQL that I am trying to get working on MSSQL:

Code:

SELECT n.*,
round((n.rgt-n.lft-1)/2,0) AS childs,
count(*)+(n.lft>1) AS level,
((min(p.rgt)-n.rgt-(n.lft>1))/2) > 0 AS lower,
(( (n.lft-max(p.lft)>1) )) AS upper
FROM table n
...

But, I get this error message:

Server: Msg 170, Level 15, State 1, Line 3
Line 3: Incorrect syntax near '>'.

Is there a way to convert this? Thanks

View Replies !

CURSOR Select Clause
I need to dynamically construct the field order of a cursor based on fixed labels from another table, but when I put that resulting query I receive the error:

Server: Msg 16924, Level 16, State 1, Line 78
Cursorfetch: The number of variables declared in the INTO list must match that of selected columns.

I have 6 fields defined in the cursor select, and 6 parameters in the fetch. The results of running the @sql portion returns valid data. Should this be possible to define a parameter containing the select clause of the cursor?

select colnum, coldesc, colname into #ae_defs from ae_adefs
select @Sql = (select colname from #ae_defs where coldesc = 'PATIENT NAME') +
', ' +
(select colname from #ae_defs where coldesc = 'PATIENT NUMBER') +
', ' +
(select colname from #ae_defs where coldesc = 'ACCOUNT NUMBER') +
', ' +
(select colname from #ae_defs where coldesc = 'VISIT DATE') +
', ' +
(select colname from #ae_defs where coldesc = 'VISIT TYPE') +
', DocID from ae_dtl1'

DECLARE myCursor CURSOR FOR
Select @SQL

OPEN myCursor
print @@Cursor_rows
FETCH NEXT FROM myCursor into @var1, @var2, @var3, @var4, @var5, @DocID

View Replies !

Select A As B And Reference B In The Where Clause
Hello,

When you rename a field/calculation in the select part of the sql statement, how do you reference it in the where clause?

For example:

Select A, B, (C + D) as X
From test
WHERE X > 1

Many thanks!

View Replies !

IF Statement In SELECT WHERE Clause
Hi Everyone,

I have the following stored procedure, I would like to use
IF statement or something of the sort in the where clause i.e.
The last line in the SP is: AND (category.categoryID = @categoryID),
I only want to check this, if @categoryID is not = 12.
So can I do something like this:

IF @categoryID <> 12
AND (category.categoryID = @categoryID)

STORED PROCEDURE:

CREATE PROCEDURE sp_get_total_risk_patients
@categoryID int
AS

SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT patient.patientID) AS total_patients
FROM patient
INNER JOIN patient_record ON patient.patientID = patient_record.patientID
INNER JOIN sub_category ON sub_category.sub_categoryID = patient.sub_categoryID
INNER JOIN category ON category.categoryID = sub_category.categoryID
WHERE risk = 6
AND (completed_date = '' OR completed_date IS NULL)
AND (category.categoryID = @categoryID)

View Replies !

'SELECT Clause Does Not Return Rowset From Sp'
I have sp20, simplified, as:

ALTER PROCEDURE dbo.sp20 (@CustomerID int, @aDate as datetime) AS

SELECT Customers.* INTO #EndResult1 FROM Customers WHERE Customers.CustomerID >= @CustomerID

SELECT Orders.* INTO #EndResult2 FROM Orders Where Orders.[TakenDate] >= @aDate

SELECT #EndResult1.*, #EndResult2.*
FROM #EndResult1 INNER JOIN #EndResult2 ON #EndResult1.CustomerID = #EndResult2.CustomerID

This works fine in EM.

When I try to execute it from MS Access ADP Project I get

'Stored Procedure excuted succesfully, but did not return any records'

Although, in EM it returns the right number of records.

Thank you in advance - Rehman

View Replies !

Use Of User Defined In SELECT Clause
I'm having this query:SELECTss.subscription_id AS SubscriptionId,s.id AS ScopeId,s.[name] AS ScopeName,s.base AS ScopeBase,dbo.iqGetShapesByScopeAsString(s.id) AS ShapesAsStringFROMsubscription_scope ss,scope sWHEREss.subscription_id = @subscription_idANDss.scope_id = s.idORDER BYs.[name]The select only returns a single row but my database (SQL Server 2005CTP) seems to execute the "iqGetShapesByScopeAsString" function foreach row in the subscription_scope and scope tables. This is a bug,right? The function should be executed only once for each *returned*row in the SELECT, right? I believe that was the case in SQL 2k thoughI can't check it at the moment.// pt

View Replies !

Grouping Select Statements With Where Clause
Hello

What I need to do is be able to group the results of my select statements in different columns. And end having the result work like this.

campaign Col1 Col2

<<Data>> <<Select counT(*) where field= value>> <<Select counT(*) where field= value>>

View Replies !

Optimising Select Statements Which Has A ‘LIKE’ Where Clause.
Hi all

I have been doing some development work in a large VB6 application. I have updated the search capabilities of the application to allow the user to search on partial addresses as the existing search routine only allowed you to search on the whole line of the address.

Simple change to the stored procedure (this is just an example not the real stored proc):

From:
Select Top 3000 * from TL_ClientAddresses with(nolock) Where strPostCode = ‘W1 ABC’
To:
Select Top 3000 * from TL_ClientAddresses with(nolock) Where strPostCode LIKE ‘W1%’

Now this is when things went a bit crazy. I know the implications of using ‘with(nolock)’. But seeing the code is only using the ID field to get the required row, and the database is a live database with hundreds of users at any one time (some updating), I think a dirty read is ok in this routine, as I don’t want SQL to create a shared lock.

Anyway my problem is this. After the change, the search now created a Shared Lock which sometimes locks out some of the live users updating the system. The Select is also extremely SLOW. It took about 5 minutes to search just over a million records (locking the database during the search, and giving my manager good reason to shout abuse at me). So I checked the indexes. I had an index set on:

strAddressLine1, strAddressLine2, strAddressLine3, strAddressLine4, strPostCode.

So I created an index just for the strPostCode (non clustered).

This had no change to the ‘Like select’ what so ever. So I am now stuck.

1)Is there another way to search for part of a text field in SQL.
2)Does ‘Like’ comparison use the index in any way? If so how do I set this index up?
3)Can I stop a ‘Shared Lock’ being created when I do a ‘like select’?
4)Do you have any good comebacks I could tell the boss after his next outburst of abuse (please not so bad that he sacks me).

Any advice truly appreciated.

View Replies !

UDefined Functions In Select/ Where Clause
Hi,

Is there any way of emulating Oracle's capability of passing output of user-defined functions in the select statement or better still in the Where clause in SQL server 7.0? If not then could we hope for it in SQl server 2000?

Regards,
Vikas..

View Replies !

Use A Variable Along With The FROM Clause In SELECT Statement
I have a table 'table_list' which contains two columns, table_name and a record_count. This table stores a list of tables and their corresponding record counts.

What I am trying to do is, to be able to write a select statement, that can read each table name in the 'table_name' column, execute a select count(*) for the same, and update its record_count with the result of select count(*).

This is the code in my procedure..

DECLARE @tab_list CURSOR
set @tab_list = CURSOR FOR select * from table_list
OPEN @tab_list

DECLARE @tab_name varchar(256)
DECLARE @rec_cnt int
FETCH NEXT FROM @tab_list INTO @tab_name, @rec_cnt

select count(*) from @tab_name

This select is looping around along with FETCH till all the table names are exhausted and their counts are updated from the cursor back into the table.

Problem is that, I am not able to use select count(*) from @tab_name, and its not accepting a variable there.

Please help me to construct the select statement that is similiar to

x=<table name>
select * from x
where x is a variable and the table name gets substituted.

what is the syntax for it ?

View Replies !

Select Inner Join With Where Clause Problems
Hello All,

I have a question about a Select over 2 Tables,
with the Following Scenario (Not all Products (ARTICULOS) haves CARAC's on the CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS table):

Picture of the tables here:
http://www.pci-baleares.com/pantallazoSql.jpg

We have per example 7 Slots (Motherboard, CPU, VGA Card, RAM, TOWER, etc...)
When we fill the Slot with a CPU-> Then we open the Slot for VGA CARD, we do the Followin Select:

SELECT dbo.ARTICULOS.*
FROM dbo.CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS INNER JOIN
dbo.ARTICULOS ON dbo.CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS.ID_ARTICULO = dbo.ARTICULOS.ID_ARTICULO

Ok it brings up ALL Graphic Cards because they dont depends on CPU

Now we go to the Motherboard Slot
And we make the following Select to obtain the compatible Motherboards:
SELECT dbo.ARTICULOS.*

FROM dbo.CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS INNER JOIN

dbo.ARTICULOS ON dbo.CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS.ID_ARTICULO = dbo.ARTICULOS.ID_ARTICULO

WHERE

((dbo.CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS.ID_CARAC = 7) AND (dbo.CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS.VALOR = 'PCI-E')) AND
((ID_CARAC = 1) AND (VALOR = '775'))

We check the motherboards if they support PCI-E (because we selected a Graphic card of that, and SOCKET 775 because the CPU)

But SQL return 0 Rows, if we do the following Select:
SELECT dbo.ARTICULOS.*

FROM dbo.CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS INNER JOIN

dbo.ARTICULOS ON dbo.CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS.ID_ARTICULO = dbo.ARTICULOS.ID_ARTICULO

WHERE

((dbo.CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS.ID_CARAC = 7) AND (dbo.CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS.VALOR = 'PCI-E'))

OR

SELECT dbo.ARTICULOS.*

FROM dbo.CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS INNER JOIN

dbo.ARTICULOS ON dbo.CFG_CARAC_ARTICULOS.ID_ARTICULO = dbo.ARTICULOS.ID_ARTICULO

WHERE

((ID_CARAC = 1) AND (VALOR = '775'))

It return Rows, it happens just if the Where clause haves more as 1 specifications...

Any solution for it? It drives me crazy :D

Thanks and regards
Marc HÃ¤gele

View Replies !

Is It Possible To Use A Where Clause In Select Statments When You Use Intersection?

Lets say that Dealers have ZipCodes, and that a Dealer can have more than one zipCode, and we want the list of dealers that have both 90210 and 90211 zip codes. BUT we don't want any dealers that have only one of the two ZipCodes in question

What I want to do is something like this

Select DealerID from DealerZips where Zip = '90210'
intersection
Select DealerID from DealerZips where Zip = '90211'

but I get this error msg:
Line 2: Incorrect syntax near 'intersection'

The following sql is silly, but it does run without error
Select DealerID from DealerZips
intersection
Select DealerID from DealerZips

So I am pretty sure my problem is with the Where clauses.

help!

View Replies !

Select .. NOT IN Clause Doesn't Return Anything?
Hi there,

It's a very strange thing!
I havea a table called invoices, and a table calle customer payments which has the invoiceID of the payment.

I have many invoices that haven't been paid (so they don't have a record on the customer payments). I know this, as i can for example do:
select * from invoices where invoiceID = 302247 (and i'll get one result)
select * from customer_payments where invoice = 302247 (and i'll get none results)

however, if i do the following:
select * from invoices where invoice_id not in
(select invoice_id from customer_payments)
I get nothing!!!???

It doesn't make any sense, as I should get at least 300 (including the 302247) - both invoiceids fields are int... so i just don't understand what's wrong?

thank you so much for any help!

Grazi

View Replies !

Select Stored Procedure With One Parameter And A Where Clause
Here is my procedure:
ALTER PROCEDURE dbo.SelectMeds
@RX int
AS
SELECT RX FROM tblMeds WHERE RX= @RX

RETURN
but it return no rows, how do I fix this?

View Replies !

Not Able To Do Insert And Select Clause With Aggregate Function
Hi,

Could some one help me how to do

insert into test2(id,name) values ((select max(id) from test1),'user1')
in MS SQL Server

its throwing "Subqueries are not allowed in this context. Only sc
alar expressions are allowed" Exception. Help is appreciated.

Thanks,
Murali

View Replies !

Does The Group By Have To Include All Fields From The SELECT Clause?
hey all,

say i have the following function

SELECT GLF_CHART_ACCT.DESCR1, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR1, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR2,
F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR3, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR_CITY, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR_STATE,
F1ADR_ADDRESS.POST_CODE, F1ADR_ADDRESS.PHONE_NBR, F1ADR_ADDRESS.FAX_NBR,
F1ADR_ADDRESS.EMAIL_ADDR_NAME, F1ADR_ADDRESS.CONTACT_NAME,
F1ADR_ADDRESS.CONTACT_TITLE, GLF_CHART_ACCT.ACCNBRI, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ENTITY_UNIQUE_NBR

FROM GLF_CHART_ACCT

INNER JOIN F1ADR_ADDRESS ON (GLF_CHART_ACCT.CHART_NAME = F1ADR_ADDRESS.ENTITY_KEY1)
AND (GLF_CHART_ACCT.ACCNBRI = F1ADR_ADDRESS.ENTITY_KEY2)

GROUP BY GLF_CHART_ACCT.DESCR1, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR1, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR2,
F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR3, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR_CITY, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR_STATE,
F1ADR_ADDRESS.POST_CODE, F1ADR_ADDRESS.PHONE_NBR, F1ADR_ADDRESS.FAX_NBR,
F1ADR_ADDRESS.EMAIL_ADDR_NAME, F1ADR_ADDRESS.CONTACT_NAME, GLF_CHART_ACCT.ACCNBRI,
F1ADR_ADDRESS.CONTACT_TITLE, GLF_CHART_ACCT.CHART_NAME, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ENTITY_UNIQUE_NBR,
GLF_CHART_ACCT.SELN_TYPE1_CODE

HAVING CHART_NAME='ARCHART' AND GLF_CHART_ACCT.DESCR1 <> '' AND GLF_CHART_ACCT.SELN_TYPE1_CODE = 'Trade'
AND GLF_CHART_ACCT.DESCR1 LIKE '%" + Search + "%' ORDER BY GLF_CHART_ACCT.DESCR1;

I get errors if not all the fields are included in the group by clause.

what i dont get is why i have to create seperate groups for this query...or am i reading it wrong??

Cheers,

Justin

View Replies !

How Do I Select Data Using A Datetime Field In The Where Clause?
I would like to do something like this, but it does not work.

Select * from PS_AUDIT_EMPLYMNT
WHERE AUDIT_STAMP LIKE `Oct 15 1998%`

*Note AUDIT_STAMP is a Datetime field

Does anyone have any ideas why this will not work?

Thanks,

Rodney

View Replies !

SELECT Clause To Determine If A Field Is Japanese
I am currently trying to find a way in which I can determine if a column in a Select clause is Japanese. The column currently supports English and Japanese Kanjis and other kanas. Is there a way to determine if this column is not English or if it is Japanese without physically looking at it.?

Thanks .... Chris

View Replies !

Gridview Select Statement With User.identity.name In The Where Clause
Hello everyone,
I have a view, NAS_vPosition that has a coloumn vLogin_Acting and I want to use the user.identity.name to select the row from this table that matches.
So far i have tried:
SelectCommand = "Select * FROM NAS_vPosition WHERE vLogin_Acting = ' <%=User.Identity.Name %> ' "
with no success.
Any help is appreciated

View Replies !

Need To Pass 'UserName' To SQL Select WHERE Clause In The Data Source
Hi.I bet this is a 101 question, but i'd appreciate any help!I am in the 'where...' section of the configure data source wizzard .Column: I grab 'UserName' Operator: I select '='BUT how do I get the UserName (The user is signed into the app) Is it from the Form? Profile? Session?Ive tried profile.name..... THANKS In advance.... Dan

View Replies !

SQL Select Command With Where Clause Variable Based On ASP.NET TextBox
All,

Please can someone advise how to use SQL select statement with where clasue which is based on a textBox.text value.
ex. below example I set the textbox.text value to a C# variable called TextBoxValue1 but I receive error this is not a valid
This is all done in Page_Load event backend code.
string strCommandtext = "Select Type.TypeName, Type.TypeDesc FROM Type Where Type.TypeName = TextBoxValue1";

View Replies !

Select Statement Using Multi-list Box Values For WHERE IN SQL Clause
I have a gridview that is based on the selection(s) in a listbox. The gridview renders fine if I only select one value from the listbox. I recive this error though when I select more that one value from the listbox:
Syntax error converting the nvarchar value '4,1' to a column of data type int. If, however, I hard code 4,1 in place of @ListSelection (see below selectCommand WHERE and IN Clauses) the gridview renders perfectly.
<asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSourceAll" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString %>"
SelectCommand="SELECT DISTINCT dbo.Contacts.Title, dbo.Contacts.FirstName, dbo.Contacts.MI, dbo.Contacts.LastName, dbo.Contacts.Suffix, dbo.Contacts.Dear, dbo.Contacts.Honorific, dbo.Contacts.Address, dbo.Contacts.Address2, dbo.Contacts.City, dbo.Contacts.StateOrProvince, dbo.Contacts.PostalCode FROM dbo.Contacts INNER JOIN dbo.tblListSelection ON dbo.Contacts.ContactID = dbo.tblListSelection.contactID INNER JOIN dbo.ListDescriptions ON dbo.tblListSelection.selListID = dbo.ListDescriptions.ID WHERE (dbo.tblListSelection.selListID IN (@ListSelection)) AND (dbo.Contacts.StateOrProvince LIKE '%') ORDER BY dbo.Contacts.LastName">
<SelectParameters>
<asp:Parameter Name="ListSelection" DefaultValue="1"/>
</SelectParameters>
</asp:SqlDataSource>
The selListID column is type integer in the database.
I'm using the ListBox1_selectedIndexChanged in the code behind like this where I've tried using setting my selectparameter using the label1.text value and the Requst.From(ListBox1.UniqueID) value with the same result:

Protected Sub ListBox1_SelectedIndexChanged(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles ListBox1.SelectedIndexChanged
Dim Item As ListItem
For Each Item In ListBox1.Items
If Item.Selected Then
If Label1.Text <> "" Then
Label1.Text = Label1.Text + Item.Value + ","
Else
Label1.Text = Item.Value + ","
End If
End If
Next
Label1.Text = Label1.Text.TrimEnd(",")
SqlDataSourceAll.SelectParameters("ListSelection").DefaultValue = Request.Form(ListBox1.UniqueID)
End Sub
What am I doing wrong here? Thanks!

View Replies !

Trying To Use The Results Of A Case Statement In My Select List In My WHERE Clause?
I am fairly new with SQL and still learning. I have used a case statemtent for a column in my select list and want to use the results of that statement's field in my WHERE clause but it is not working for me. Here is the code I have so far:

SELECT
l.loanid,
p.investorid,
l.duedate,
case when pc.duedate >= l.duedate then pc.duedate end as RateDueDate,
pc.interestrate
FROM loan l
inner join participation p on p.loanid = l.loanid
inner join paymentchange pc on pc.loanid = l.loanid
where p.investorid = '12345' and RateDueDate is not null
order by l.loanid, pc.duedate

I want to put the results of this case statment in my where clause like highlighted above but it is not working because RateDueDate is not an actual column in the table. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

View Replies !

How To Use ORDER BY Clause In An SELECT DISTINCT Sql Query When AS SINGLECOLUMN Is Defined?
Hi,
I wonder if its possible to perform a ORDER BY clause in an SELECT DISTINCT sql query whereby the AS SINGLECOLUMN is used. At present I am recieving error: ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if SELECT DISTINCT is specified. My guess is that I cant perform the Order By clauses because it cant find the columns individually. It is essentail I get this to work somehow...
Can anyone help? Thanks in advance
Gemma

View Replies !

Combing In A Cursor, A Select Statement With The WHERE Clause Stored In A Variable
Hi
I am ramesh here from go-events.com
I am using sql mail to send out emails to my mailing list

I have difficulty combining a select statement with a where clause stored in a variable inside a cursor

The users select the mail content and frequency of delivery and i deliver the mail

I use lots of queries and a stored procedure to retrieve thier preferences. In the end i use a cursor to send out mails to each of them.

Because my query is dynamic, the where clause of my select statement is stored in a variable. I have the following code
that does not work

For example

DECLARE overdue3 CURSOR
LOCAL FORWARD_ONLY
FOR SELECT DISTINCT Events.E_Name, Events.E_SDate, Events.E_City, Events.E_ID FROM Events, IndustryEvents + @sqlquery2
OPEN overdue3

I get an error message at the '+' sign
which says, cannot use empty object or column names, use a single
space if necessary

How do I combine the select statement with the where clause?

Help me...I need help urgently

View Replies !

Using The ORDER BY Clause When The Ordered Column Is Not Needed In The SELECT Statement
Greetings,

I have a C# application that calls a stored procedure to query the database (MSSQL 2005). I only have one field/column returned from the query but I need that column ordered.

How do I use the ORDER BY clause without returning the index column which does the sorting? The first example is NOT what I want. I want something that works like the second example which only returns the 'Name' column.

ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MyProcedure]

AS

BEGIN

SELECT DISTINCT A.Name, A.index

FROM
...
...
ORDER BY A.[Index], A.Name ASC

END

ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MyProcedure]

AS

BEGIN

SELECT DISTINCT A.Name
FROM
...
...
ORDER BY A.[Index]

END

Thanks

View Replies !

Mapping A String Field To Boolean Output In SELECT Clause
Hello,
I am facing a problem in a SELECT clause which i cannot solve.
In my SQL table ("myTable") i have a few columns ("Column1", "Column2", "TypeColumn"). When I select different columns of the table, instead of getting the value of TypeColumn, i would like to get a boolean indicating whether its value is a certain string or not.
For example, the TypeColumn accepts only a number of selected strings: "AAA", "BBB", "CCC".
when i do a select query on the table, instead of asking for TypeColumn i would like to ask a boolean value of 1 if TypeColumn is "AAA" and 0 if TypeColumn is "BBB" or "CCC". Also, i would like to make this query while I am also fetching the other columns. And i would like to use one query to get all that. I thought something like thsi would work:

SELECT Column1 AS Col1, Column2 AS Col2, IF(TypeColumn = "AAA", 1, 0) AS Col3
FROM myTable

but this doesn't work in SQL 2005!
Is it possible to do something similar in SQL 2005 using one query only? i am trying to avoid multiple queries for this.

thanks a lot for your help!

View Replies !

Order By Clause In DECLARE CURSOR Select Statement Won't Compile
The stored procedure, below, results in this error when I try to compile...

Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure InsertImportedReportData, Line 69
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ORDER'.

However the select statement itself runs perfectly well as a query, no errors.

The T-SQL manual says you can't use the keywords COMPUTE, COMPUTE BY, FOR BROWSE, and INTO in a cursor select statement, but nothing about plain old ORDER BYs.

What gives with this?

Thanks in advance
R.

The code:

Code Snippet

-- ================================================
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
IF object_id('InsertImportedReportData ') IS NOT NULL
    DROP PROCEDURE InsertImportedReportData
GO
-- =============================================
-- Author:        -----
-- Create date:
-- Description:    inserts imported records, marking as duplicates if possible
-- =============================================
CREATE PROCEDURE InsertImportedReportData
    -- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here
    @importedReportID int,
    @authCode varchar(12)
AS
BEGIN
    DECLARE @errmsg VARCHAR(80);

--    SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
--    interfering with SELECT statements.
    SET NOCOUNT ON;

    --IF (@authCode <> 'TX-TEC')
    --BEGIN
     -- SET @errmsg = 'Unsupported reporting format:' + @authCode
    -- RAISERROR(@errmsg, 11, 1);
    --END

    DECLARE srcRecsCursor CURSOR LOCAL
    FOR    (SELECT
           ImportedRecordID
        ,ImportedReportID
        ,AuthorityCode
        ,[ID]
        ,[Field1] AS RecordType
        ,[Field2] AS FormType
        ,[Field3] AS ItemID
        ,[Field4] AS EntityCode
        ,[Field5] AS LastName
        ,[Field6] AS FirstMiddleNames
        ,[Field7] AS Title
        ,[Field8] AS Suffix
        ,[Field9] AS AddressLine1
        ,[Field10] AS AddressLine2
        ,[Field11] AS City
        ,[Field12] AS [State]
        ,[Field13] AS ZipFull
        ,[Field14] AS OutOfStatePAC
        ,[Field15] AS FecID
        ,[Field16] AS Date
        ,[Field17] AS Amount
        ,[Field18] AS [Description]
        ,[Field19] AS Employer
        ,[Field20] AS Occupation
        ,[Field21] AS AttorneyJob
        ,[Field22] AS SpouseEmployer
        ,[Field23] As ChildParentEmployer1
        ,[Field24] AS ChildParentEmployer2
        ,[Field25] AS InKindTravel
        ,[Field26] AS TravellerLastName
        ,[Field27] AS TravellerFirstMiddleNames
        ,[Field28] AS TravellerTitle
        ,[Field29] AS TravellerSuffix
        ,[Field30] AS TravelMode
        ,[Field31] As DptCity
        ,[Field32] AS DptDate
        ,[Field33] AS ArvCity
        ,[Field34] AS ArvDate
        ,[Field35] AS TravelPurpose
        ,[Field36] AS TravelRecordBackReference
    FROM ImportedNativeRecords
    WHERE ImportedReportID IS NOT NULL
    AND ReportType IN ('RCPT','PLDG')
    ORDER BY ImportedRecordID -- this should work but gives syntax error!
    );

END

View Replies !

Multi-Select String Parameter Values Are Converted To N'Value1', N'Value2' In Clause When Report Is Run

I understand that Multi-Select Parameters are converted behind the scenes to an In Clause when a report is executed. The problem that I have is that my multi-select string parameter is turned into an in claused filled with nvarchar/unicode expressions like:

Where columnName in (N'Value1', N'Value2', N'Value3'...)

This nvarchar / unicode expression takes what is already a fairly slow-performing construct and just drives it into the ground. When I capture my query with Profiler (so I can see the In Clause that is being built), I can run it in Management Studio and see the execution plan. Using N'Values' instead of just 'Value1', 'Value2','Value3' causes the query performance to drop from 40 seconds to two minutes and 40 seconds. It's horrible. How can I make it stop!!!?

Is there any way to force the query-rewriting process in Reporting Services to just use plain-old, varchar text values instead of forcing each value in the list to be converted on the fly to an Nvarchar value like this? The column from which I am pulling values for the parameter and the column that I am filtering are both just plain varchar.

Thanks,

TC

View Replies !

Dummy Where Clause Allowing Dummy Select Of Data - Utilizing Where Value = 1
Years ago, I remember while doing maintenance on a stored procedure seeing a 'Select x, y, z Where 'some value' = 1.

The function of this, I believe was to make the select work but not retrieve any actual values.

I am attempting to use this in an 'Insert Into Select values From' statement. This insert uses multiple selects via unions and I need a final dummy Select statement with no Where criteria.

What I am thinking may not even apply to what I need to do here.

If you recognize something even remotely near what I am trying to get across I would appreciate your sending me the code.

Another solution for me is just inserting one row with a final RecId = 6 and ' ' or 0 values for the other fields into a table
but I was hoping this would work.

Example:

Insert Into table
Select
1 as RecId,
' ' as field1,
field2
From test1
Where field2 = 'CA'

Union
Select
2 as RecId,
' ' as field1,
field2
From test1
Where field2 = 'NJ'

Union

/*Final Select */

Select
6 as RecId,
' ' as field1,
field2
From test1
Where 'some value' = 1'

Thanks much for your assistance!!!

TADEG

View Replies !

GROUP By Clause Or DISTINCT Clause
Hi, can anyone shed some light on this issue?SELECT Status from lupStatuswith a normal query it returns the correct recordcountSELECT Status from lupStatus GROUP BY Statusbut with a GROUP By clause or DISTINCT clause it return the recordcount= -1

View Replies !

Filtering Results In The Where Clause Vs A Having Clause
I am working with a vendor on upgrading their application from SQL2K to SQL2K5 and am running into the following.

When on SQL Server 2000 the following statement ran without issue:

UPDATE dbo.Track_ID

SET dbo.Track_ID.Processed = 4 --Regular 1 leg call thats been completed

WHERE Processed = 0 AND LegNum = 1

AND TrackID IN

(

SELECT TrackID

FROM dbo.Track_ID

GROUP BY TrackID

HAVING MAX(LegNum) = 1 AND

TrackID + 'x1' IN

(

SELECT

dbo.Track_ID.TrackID + 'x' + CONVERT(NVARCHAR(2), COUNT(dbo.Track_ID.TrackID))

FROM dbo.Track_ID INNER JOIN dbo.transactions

ON dbo.Track_ID.SM_ID = dbo.transactions.sm_session_id

GROUP BY dbo.Track_ID.TrackID

)

)
Once moved to SQL Server 2005 the statement would not return and showed SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD to be the waittype when executed. This machine is SP1 and needs to be upgraded to SP2, something that is not going to happen near time.

I changed the SQL to the following, SQL Server now runs it in under a second, but now the app is not functioning correctly. Are the above and the following semantically the same?

UPDATE dbo.Track_ID

SET dbo.Track_ID.Processed = 4 --Regular 1 leg call thats been completed

WHERE Processed = 0 AND LegNum = 1

AND TrackID IN
(

SELECT TrackID

FROM dbo.Track_ID

WHERE TrackID + 'x1' IN

(

SELECT dbo.Track_ID.TrackID + 'x' + CONVERT(NVARCHAR(2), COUNT(dbo.Track_ID.TrackID))

FROM dbo.Track_ID INNER JOIN dbo.transactions

ON dbo.Track_ID.SM_ID = dbo.transactions.sm_session_id

GROUP BY dbo.Track_ID.TrackID

)
GROUP BY TrackID

HAVING MAX(LegNum) = 1

)

View Replies !

ERROR [42000] [Lotus][ODBC Lotus Notes]Table Reference Has To Be A Table Name Or An Outer Join Escape Clause In A FROM Clause
I am using web developer 2008, while connecting to I wanted to fetch data from Lotus notes database file, for this i used notesql connector, while connectiong to notes database i am fetting error

ERROR [42000] [Lotus][ODBC Lotus Notes]Table reference has to be a table name or an outer join escape clause in a FROM clause

I have already checked that database & table name are correct, please help me out
How i can fetch the lotus notes data in my asp.net pages.

View Replies !

Having Clause Without GROUP BY Clause?
Hi,

What is HAVING clause equivalent in the following oracle query, without the combination of "GROUP BY" clause ?

eg :

SELECT SUM(col1) from test HAVING col2 < 5

SELECT SUM(col1) from test WHERE x=y AND HAVING col2 < 5

I want the equivalent query in MSSQLServer for the above Oracle query.

Also, does the aggregate function in Select column(here the SUM(col1)) affect in anyway the presence of HAVING clause?.

Thanks,
Gopi.

View Replies !

SQL Inner Join Clause And The Where Clause
Hi everyone,
I saw some queries where SQL inner join clause and the where clause is used at the same time. I knew that "on" is used instead of the "where" clause. Would anyone please exaplin me why both "where" and "on" clause is used in some sql Select queries ?

Thanks

View Replies !

Diff In On Clause And Where Clause?????
hi..
i have basic question like

what is differance between conditions put in ON clause and in WHERE clause in JOINS????

see conditions that shown in brown color

select d1.SourceID, d1.PID, d1.SummaryID, d1.EffectiveDate,
d1.Audit, d1.ExpirationDate, d1.Indicator
from[DB1].[dbo].[Implicit] d1 inner join [DB2].[dbo].[Implicit] d2
on d1.SummaryID=d2.SummaryID
AND d1.ListType = d2.ListType
AND (d1.EffectiveDate <= d2.ExpirationDate or d2.ExpirationDate is null)
AND (d1.ExpirationDate >= d2.EffectiveDate or d1.ExpirationDate is null)
whered1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID AND
(d1.SourceID<>d2.SourceID
OR (d1.SourceID IS NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NOT NULL)
OR (d1.SourceID IS NOT NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NULL)
)

select d1.SourceID, d1.PID, d1.SummaryID, d1.EffectiveDate,
d1.Audit, d1.ExpirationDate, d1.Indicator
from[DB1].[dbo].[Implicit] d1 inner join [DB2].[dbo].[Implicit] d2
on d1.SummaryID=d2.SummaryID
AND d1.ImplicitID = d1.ImplicitIDAND d1.ListType = d2.ListType
AND (d1.EffectiveDate <= d2.ExpirationDate or d2.ExpirationDate is null)
AND (d1.ExpirationDate >= d2.EffectiveDate or d1.ExpirationDate is null)
whered1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID AND
(d1.SourceID<>d2.SourceID
OR (d1.SourceID IS NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NOT NULL)
OR (d1.SourceID IS NOT NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NULL)
)

another thing...

if we put AND d1.ImplicitID = d1.ImplicitID condition in second query then shall we remove
d1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID from WHERE clause????

View Replies !

Top Clause With GROUP BY Clause
How Can I use Top Clause with GROUP BY clause?

Here is my simple problem.

I have two tables

Categories
Products

I want to know Top 5 Products in CategoryID 1,2,3,4,5

Resultset should contain 25 Rows ( 5 top products from each category )

I hope someone will help me soon.
Its urngent

thanks in advance

regards
Waqas

View Replies !

How To: Create A SELECT To Select Records From A Table Based On The First Letter.......
Dear All
I need to cerate a SP that SELECTS all the records from a table WHERE the first letter of each records starts with 'A' or 'B' or 'C' and so on. The letter is passed via a parameter from a aspx web page, I was wondering that someone can help me in the what TSQL to use I am not looking for a solution just a poin in the right direction. Can you help.

Thanks Ross

View Replies !

Multiple Tables Select Performance - SQL 2005 - Should It Take 90 Seconds For A Select?
I have a problem where my users complain that a select statement takes too long, at 90 seconds, to read 120 records out of a database.
The select statement reads from 9 tables three of which contain 1000000 records, the others contain between 100 and 250000 records.
I have checked that each column in the joins are indexed - they are (but some of them are clustered indexes, not unclustered).
I have run the SQL Profiler trace from the run of the query through the "Database Engine Tuning Advisor". That just suggested two statistics items which I added (no benefit) and two indexes for tables that are not involved at all in the query (I didn't add these).
I also ran the query through the Query window in SSMS with "Include Actual Execution Plan" enabled. This showed that all the execution time was being taken up by searches of the clustered indexes.
I have tried running the select with just three tables involved, and it completes fast. I added a fourth and it took 7 seconds. However there was no WHERE clause for the fourth table, so I got a cartesian product which might have explained the problem.
So my question is: Is it normal for such a type of read query to take 90 seconds to complete?
Is there anything I could do to speed it up.
Any other thoughts?
Thanks

View Replies !

Select Statement Problem - Group By Maybe Nested Select?
Hey guys i have a stock table and a stock type table and what i would like to do is say for every different piece of stock find out how many are available The two tables are like thisstockIDconsumableIDstockAvailableconsumableIDconsumableName So i want to,Select every consumableName in my table and then group all the stock by the consumable ID with some form of total where stockavailable = 1I should then end up with a table like thisEpson T001 - Available 6Epson T002 - Available 0Epson T003 - Available 4If anyone can help me i would be very appreciative. If you want excact table names etc then i can put that here but for now i thought i would ask how you would do it and then give it a go myself.ThanksMatt

View Replies !