Transaction Scope Rollback Does Not Roll Back Action Of Activation SP
Aug 16, 2007
Hi,
I followed Remus' post about not doing 'fire and forget'.
I have two queues, ProcessingSendQueue and ProcessingReceiveQueue.
Once i receive from ProcessingReceiveQueue, activation SP gets called on ProcessingSendQueue and ends conversation.
However,if I then get an exception, the action of the activation SP ( ie the ending of the conversation ) does not get rolled back... is this possible? I would have thought that the action of the activation SP would get rolled back too.
My ProcessingSendQueue activation SP is as follows:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[ProcessingSendQueue_AP]
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @dh UNIQUEIDENTIFIER;
DECLARE @message_type SYSNAME;
DECLARE @message_body NVARCHAR(4000);
RECEIVE @dh = [conversation_handle], @message_type = [message_type_name], @message_body = CAST([message_body] AS NVARCHAR(4000))
FROM [ProcessingSendQueue];
IF @dh IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
IF @message_type = N'http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQL/ServiceBroker/Error'
BEGIN
RAISERROR (N'Received error %s from service [ProcessingReceiveQueue]', 10, 1, @message_body) WITH LOG;
END
END CONVERSATION @dh;
END
END
Hello, I do not know how to implement transaction roll back in asp.net application. I am using SqlHelper class to communicate with my sql db.Thanks, junior
Goofed up and ran an update query. It messed up all the data in a single table. I'm trying not to restore the table from a previous backup since the backup is more than 20 GB. It's going to take forever to restore it. Any advice would be much appreciated!
I have a situation where there are two tables Negotiation and Rubrics. A single negotiation can have N number of Rubrics. Hence it has Primary Key - Foreign Key relationship. Now I am using two different updatable recordset, to make changes from the form.
The problem is with the close button we have in Negotiation Form. For example, a user says create negotiation and fills in d details in the Neg form, and adds several rubric to it (which opens a seperate rubric form). When each rubric is created and comes back to negotiation form, the record is actually updated in the database from the recordset. (Since Rubric is a different recordset).
Now, When i say close from the Negotiation Form. The changes should not be committed or in other words, no changes should be committed, generally its should be rolled back to the original state. Since all the rubric info is already in the database, this is a problem.(hard to track wat all rubrics the negotiation had initially)
I thought of maintaining a transaction in the db, but that wld need a single connection, which is not recommended.
I wrote a stored procedure. It work properly. But I want to catch if any error occurs while executing it. And I want to make roll Back on error .And send the error OUTPUT How can I roolBack the command below and How can I send the error over OUTPUT parameter? execute(@cmdS) Thanks.
Hi, I'm using data flow as flat file source -> derived column ->Data Conversion-> oledb destination I have a fifty thousand record in a delimited file. while processing i got error in 45000th row. In database only 40000 records are there(why is there no all 45000 records). Is there any way to roll back all the 40000 records.
I have an application that allows users to synchronize SQL CE data with the server. I would like to implement the functionality wherein if the synch process hits an error, the whole synchronization rolls back.
Is it possible to roll back the Synchronization process? I am using Merge replication over web in the application.
Hi, I'm planning to install the cumulative hotfix (build 2187) on my sql 2000 clustering server (SP4, 2040). And I would like to know if the cumulative hotfix is able to roll back. If possible, please provide me any information about that. Thanks in advance.
hey guys i need help urgently i just ran an update statement without a where statement by mistake and i need to rollback this changes
i;m runnning sql express sp2 and the database is set to recovery model simple
i hace the mdf and ldf file the mdf is 1.5 gb ledf is 65 mb and the last changed date is the same time i ran the update statement so i think the changes are there in the ldf file but i just need to roll back to 1 minute b4 i run the update
My question is how to get IDENTITY_INSERT Incriment Primary Key ID roll back when the application fails. Using TransactionScope with single connection in DataObject. I am trying to insert row in two dataTable using its own tableAdapter (two tableAdapter). I have Product table with ProductID primary key with incriment identity. and that ProductID is used to insert row in ProductHistory Table. Lets say Product table has the last ProductID=8 (8 rows) and the next ProductID will be 9. When I insert row in both table and if the second table insert fails both gets roll back (which is good). but when I insert again another time the Product ID=10 not 9. Is there any way to roll back the ProductID in Product table so when i insert next time it has incriment number instead of gap.
I have a script contains multiple statements to update multiple tables. How can I make sure that either all statements get executed successfully or no changes apply to the tables (in case one or more errors occur)? I've been searching on Internet and it seems like I need to use Rollback and begin transaction.
I have a situation where i need to insert or update the data from a flat file to a sql server database. The flat file contains nearly one lakh records.
I am using transactions. If all the rows are inserted or updated successfully i am commiting. If there is any error i am rollbacking the transaction.
when rollbacking the transaction it is taking more than 3 to 4 hours.
I am having some problem with SSIS transaction. Eventhought I tried to imitate the concept that Jamie presented at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/jthomson/transactionsinsqlserver2005integrationservices.asp
. My workflow is as followed
********************************* For Each ADO.Record in Oracle (transaction=not supported)
If (Certain_Field_Value = 'A')
Lookup Data in SQL DB with values from Oracle (transaction=not supported)
DO Sequence A (Start a Transaction , transaction=required)
INSERT/UPDATE some records in SQLDB(transaction=supported) Finish Sequence A ( transaction should stop here) UPDATE Oracle DB ( Execute SQLTask, transaction=not supported) If (Certain_Field_Value = 'B')
Lookup Data in SQL DB with values from Oracle (transaction=not supported)
DO Sequence B (Start a Transaction , transaction = required)
INSERT/UPDATE some records in SQLDB (transaction=supported) Finish Sequence A ( transaction should stop here) UPDATE Oracle DB ( Execute SQLTask, transaction=not supported) If (Certain_Field_Value = 'C')
------------ ------------ End ForEach Loop ************************************* My requirements are that I want separate transaction for each Sequence A, B, C, etc... If Sequence A transaction fails, the other should still be continuing with another transaction. But I am getting an error regarding the OLEDB Error in next Task (e.g in Certain_Field_Value = 'B') "Lookup Data in SQL DB with values from Oracle ", the error message is ".......Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction. ". What is it that I am doing wrong? Regards KyawAM
I'm receiving the below error when trying to implement Execute SQL Task.
"The ROLLBACK TRANSACTION request has no corresponding BEGIN TRANSACTION." This error also happens on COMMIT as well and there is a preceding Execute SQL Task with BEGIN TRANSACTION tranname WITH MARK 'tran'
I know I can change the transaction option property from "supported" to "required" however I want to mark the transaction. I was copying the way Import/Export Wizard does it however I'm unable to figure out why it works and why mine doesn't work.
Hello, I have problem for insert multiple query for insert in differenr tabels for a single record. I have mail record for candidate and now i wants to insert candiate labour info, candidate passport detail in diff tabel like candidatLabour and candidatePassport, i used two store procedure for it and i write code for it.and it works fine,but i think that if one SP executed and one record inserted but then some problem occure and 2nd SP not executed then........... so plz help me Thanks
HelloI am trying to run a program to check for transaction scopeI have written the following code.But it seems I need to add a namespace or referenceWhat namespace am I supposed to addthanksusing (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScope.Required, options)){SqlConnection MyCon = new SqlConnection("server=hemalatha\sqlexpress;integrated security=sspi;database=demo");MyCon.Open();SqlCommand Mycmd=new SqlCommand("insert into t1 values 574,'scope','10/10/2007',3,3,3");Mycmd.ExecuteNonQuery();SqlConnection MyCon1 = new SqlConnection("server=hemalatha\sqlexpress;integrated security=sspi;database=persons");MyCon1.Open();SqlCommand Mycmd1 = new SqlCommand("insert into persons values 'scope',123,123,12,'scope'");Mycmd1.ExecuteNonQuery();}
I have 2 packages and they get executed in SQL Job.
Each of these package will have seperate transactions with the Database and I am not sure of how to maintain the transactions between these 2 packages.
Can someone explain me the necessary setting to achieve this. If I set the TransactionOption property to Required (or) Supported in both these packages, will the Transaction Scope of the first package extend to the second one.
For me, If the second package ends up in error, the first package should also have to be rollbacked.
Sometimes when I do "alter database ABCD set partner failover" I get the following message: Nonqualified transactions are being rolled back. Estimated rollback completion: 100%.
In 99 percent of the cases after such message the first attempt to use an open connection would also raise an error such as "Exception: A transport-level error has occurred when sending the request to the server. (provider: Shared Memory Provider, error: 0 - No process is on the other end of the pipe.)"
After the first error all subsequent queries would run perfectly.
Hi, i'm trying to run wrap a transaction around a block of code to make sure every statement is carried out. Here's what i have: using (TransactionScope ts = new TransactionScope()) { ... ts.Complete();}The code executed in the ... part is a set of sql commands within my dal. If this above expression takes less than 30 seconds everything is carried out correctly, however if it takes longer than 30 seconds i receive an sql timeout error. I tried modify the above code to: using (TransactionScope ts = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required, TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5))) { ... ts.Complete();} But it did not seem to make a difference. I suppose the easiest option would be to increase the timeout for every sql command in my dal but i feel that the 30 second timeout is sufficient for a single command. Appreciate if someone could tell me how this should be done correctly. Thanks
Hello, I've a problem with a software developed in C# with the framework 2.0. This is the error I receive : The operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "XXX_LINKED_SERVER" was unable to begin a distributed transaction. OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "XXX_LINKED_SERVER" returned message "No transaction is active.". If I try directly to restart the process, it works fine. Is there someone who can help me ? This is the process 1. In C# --> Call of a Query : select from the linked server (db in sql 2005) and insert into a table SQL 2005 2. In the C# --> using (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope()) and insert in a table in SQL 2005 which is link server Thank in advance.
we have an update sp that must call an insert sp after the update. The update and insert must act like a transaction, ie all or none.
We believe that wrapping most of the update (including call to insert sp) sp in a begin tran block would guarantee the all or none behavior.
However, we're not sure what would happen if one of our developers calls the update sp from within a transaction scope that expects yet something additional to be included in the transaction. Would the begin tran block (assuming no errors in that block) in the sp commit both the update and insert regardless of what happens in the rest of the .net tran scope?
BEGIN TRANSACTION Copy records from live to archive END TRANSACTION with commit or rollback execute sproc to write audit log with success or fail IF transaction was committed BEGIN TRANSACTION Delete records from live the archive END TRANSACTION with commit or rollback execute sproc to write audit log with success or fail End IF
END TRANSACTION OUTERTXN with commit if both inner transactions were successful or rollback if either failed
If either inner transaction rolled back execute sproc to write audit log saying whole process is rolling back End IfMy problem is that if the outer transaction rolls back then I am losing the two audit records because they are part of the transaction scope. I want these executes to commit even if the master transaction fails.
I just made a transaction which writes and reads some data from a database as one unit. Now, I would like to know, what happens, if this transaction does not commit, but instead performs a rollback? Should I use a boolean loop which keeps on trying the transaction until it commits or is there an alternative? I would appreciate any suggestions or help!
If someone could help me with this I will be in debt to you!I am a .net developer who is working on a system that has a sql server2000 backend. On the weekends, I work from home and I have MSDE on mylaptop. This morning I went to update the main SQL server as I addedsome new views .. however I managed to import the data too!!Therefore I have overwritten my local data to the main sql serverdatabase, which has ressulted in loss of loads of work!Can I rollback to the version before I exported my data from MSDE to themain SQL server. I did the export by using enterprise manager and rightclicking on the table on my local msde and then sending it to the realsql server!Please please please help??*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
i have a froeach loop,in which i have data flow task,which i need to rollback if any other task fails..
here i need to accept multiple files and i have to give a one second pause for between each file for this i have used a dummy for loop,as i am using this for loop i cant give the for each loop property Transaction Option as required...but i need to rollback if any task fails...i have a screen shot of the for each loop
Hi everyone, In the following T-SQL code snippet,when I attempt to insert more than one record I encounter an error because of the following trigger but I have some doubts about the performation of ROLLBACK TRANSACTION in here. So there is only one transaction occured in the specified table that contain both trigger and the specified table however I supposed that when we call ROLLBACK TRANSACTION, the transaction is aborted. But the code run the Raiserror statement which is located in after the ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement. So why do this code( Raiserror) is run ? Should not it be terminated because of the ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement ??
ALTER TRIGGER kimlikNo_Degistir ON Bilgi FOR INSERT AS IF(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Inserted) > 1 BEGIN ROLLBACK TRANSACTION RAISERROR('You are not allowed to enter more than one record',12,1) END ELSE BEGIN UPDATE M SET M.KimlikNo = B.Kimlk + M.KimlikNo FROM Muhasebe as M INNER JOIN Inserted AS B ON M.Ad = B.Ad END
I made a mistake and ran a delete query that I should not have. There have been no other transactions/modifcations to the database since my delete query.