Does anyone know if there is a simple way to get the results of a DBCC
INPUTBUFFER() request into a table? I have a process for monitoring
activity that will give me the results of sp_who2 into a temp table,
and want to scroll through the active connections and get the input
buffers into another table for review:
Guys, I need to send a group of people a list of specific processes running on the server, one of the requirements is to send them what's actually being ran on the machine. I have the information I was on the sysprocess tabke and the results of the DBCC Inputbuffer. Is there a way to link both result sets?
This is the criteria of the processes that neeed to be sent out to my users:
SELECT * FROM master.dbo.sysprocesses p WHERE last_batch < DATEADD(mi, -5, GETDATE()) AND dbo.fncGetNumLocks(p.spid, DB_ID('EngDataMart')) > 1 GROUP BY p.spid, p.loginame, p.hostname, dbo.fncGetNumLocks(p.spid, db_id('DBName')) ORDER BY p.spid
if the inputbuffer contains more than 256 chars, it only reports out the first 256 characters of the buffer. that's because EventInfo is defined as a nvarchar(256) field.
is there any way to get the full inputbuffer...even if it's more than 256 chars? i'm trying to run this:
Does anyone know if there is an equivalent way to get to the information that DBCC Inputbuffer returns using 2005s dynamic management objects? sys.dm_exec_requests only returns information that is currently executing...as DBCC inptubuffer returns the last statement executed for a session.
We are running a Windows NT Terminal server 4.0 with SQL 7. The application we are using has two main connections to the database that may at times update the same table simultaneously. On two seperate occasions we have run into a lock that causes these processes to hang. They appear to still be running in the Task Manager, but have no CPU time. When we review the current activity on the SQL server under Object/locks one of the items listed is "tempdb.dbo.##lockinfo13(the spid)". The last TSQL command batch is "dbcc inputbuffer(13). We have tried to research what this dbcc inputbuffer does, and why there is a conflic here... but have come up empty. Can you help with any information on this dbcc?
Can someone please help me interpret this result set below and suggeston way I can speed up my table? What changes should I make?DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'tblListing' table...Table: 'tblListing' (1092914965); index ID: 1, database ID: 13TABLE level scan performed.- Pages Scanned................................: 97044- Extents Scanned..............................: 12177- Extent Switches..............................: 13452- Avg. Pages per Extent........................: 8.0- Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count].......: 90.17% [12131:13453]- Logical Scan Fragmentation ..................: 0.86%- Extent Scan Fragmentation ...................: 2.68%- Avg. Bytes Free per Page.....................: 1415.8- Avg. Page Density (full).....................: 82.51%DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact yoursystem administrator.Thank you.
how could I load "DBCC showcontig (@TableName) with tableResults" to a table? I created a table and let insert to it via above "DBCC...." but problem is the results with "DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.", or how could I mute this output line for each table ? thanks David --========================================= DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator. ObjectName ObjectId IndexName IndexId Level Pages Rows MinimumRecordSize MaximumRecordSize AverageRecordSize ForwardedRecords Extents ExtentSwitches AverageFreeBytes AveragePageDensity ScanDensity BestCount ActualCount LogicalFragmentation ExtentFragmentation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -------------------- -------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ---------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- -------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- sysproxylogin 37575172 clust 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
I run DBCC PAGE (dbname, 1, 136, 3) with trace 3604 on:
Server: Msg 8968, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: DBCC PAGE page (1:136) (object ID 0, index ID 0) is out of the range of this database. DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
One of our databases seems to be looking dodgy as some scheduled jobs are failing, but DBCC CHECKDB is no use since it has been running for over 1/2 hour without giving me any results, just the spinning globe.
How do I find out what is wrong without resorting to backups?
I have lost the reference but I read somewhere that when running DBCC DBREINDEX against a clustered index, all the secondary indexes on the table are automatically re-indexed as well. I did a test of this on a small table and it seemed to confirm this. However, now I've put this into practice, I am finding that it doesn't seem to work this way. I noticed that having run DBCC DBREINDEX against a table's clustered index (DBCC DBREINDEX ('tablename', 'clusteredIndexName', fill_factor)), the secondary indexes were not automatically re-indexed - as born out by the fact that they remained badly fragmented.
First of all, do the dba's who read this beleive it is correct that DBCC DBREINDEX run against a clustered index will automatically rebuild the secondary indexes too? If so, why wouldn't it work in all cases?
Normally, after I use DBCC DBREINDEX, I can be sure that Scan Density on a clustered or non-clustered index is very good - eg. 99% or 100%. However, I have one database where there are a number of indexes that are not showing any improvement in Scan Density after running DBCC DBREINDEX. In on case, a clustered index, I run it on two days in succession and Scan Density actually go worse! Can anyone give me a reason for this? Can anyone suggest how to fix it?
Dear All, i've used the DBCC showcontig command against my table table103 but i dont know how to analyze the results of fragmentation levels. please give me some explanations or some good links.....
I can find many examples of loading DBCC results into tables. They all begin with a create table statement defining the results. My question is , other than trial and error, is there a way to determine what data types will be returned. Sure you can say that first element looks like an integer, but is it really a bigint, and that text string can be varchar(max) but will char(2) work.
I'm not looking for an answer for a specific DBCC function, but rather a generic way I can determine the characteristics of any DBCC result set.
I tried
SELECT * INTO #tmp FROM OPENROWSET('SQLOLEDB', 'Server=ray;Trusted_Connection=Yes;Database=Ed_sandbox', 'Set FmtOnly OFF; DBCC loginfo WITH tableresults ')
but I got back
Msg 11527, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_describe_first_result_set, Line 1
The metadata could not be determined because statement 'DBCC loginfo WITH tableresults' does not support metadata discovery.
Here's a quick script that will return the inputbuffer of processes that are holding more than a certain threshold of locks (by default, 10, but it's easy to modify). Handy for tracking down what query is holding those 1400 locks.
Yes, it uses a cursor. I'd welcome amendment by anyone who has the insight on converting it to pure set-based.
Cheers -b
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_lock4 AS set nocount on
DECLARE @tSpids table(spid int PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED,count int) DECLARE @iSpid int,@iCount int
insert into @tSpids (spid,count) select convert (smallint, req_spid) As spid, count(*) as count
from master.dbo.syslockinfo, master.dbo.spt_values v, master.dbo.spt_values x, master.dbo.spt_values u
where master.dbo.syslockinfo.rsc_type = v.number and v.type = 'LR' and master.dbo.syslockinfo.req_status = x.number and x.type = 'LS' and master.dbo.syslockinfo.req_mode + 1 = u.number and u.type = 'L' group by converT(smallint,req_spid),'dbcc inputbuffer(' + cast(req_spid as varchar(4)) + ')' having count(*)>10 order by count(*) desc
DECLARE cLoop cursor for select spid,count from @tSpids
OPEN cLoop
FETCH NEXT FROM cLoop INTO @iSpid,@iCount WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS=0 BEGIN select 'spid ' + cast(@iSpid as varchar(4)) + ' has ' + cast(@iCount as varchar(5)) + ' locks.' exec ("dbcc inputbuffer (" + @ispid + ")") FETCH NEXT FROM cLoop INTO @iSpid,@iCount END
I am playing with DBCC command to check the contsrainst on a perticular table (DBCC CHECKCONSTRAINTS ('myTable') WITH ALL_CONSTRAINTS), it always gives the following result:
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
I am facing a rather peculiar issue where I am getting a floating point exception error while rebuilding index for a particular table.
-------- Error Number : 3628
Message :
[Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC SQLState: 42000)] Error 3628: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]A floating point exception occurred in the user process. Current transaction is canceled.
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server ------------ This seems to be a rare issue ( as acknowledged by microsoft ) and they seem to suggest that it happens with SQL Server 2000 SP3 . I migrated my database into an SQL Server 2000 SP4 and started the rebuild again .. .. But it still failed with the same error ..
Am just hoping the microsoft guys are wrong and many of you have actually faced this stuff before.. Please let me know.
Server: Msg 8928, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Object ID 1513928615, index ID 0: Page (3:33709) could not be processed. See other errors for details. Server: Msg 8944, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: Object ID 1513928615, index ID 0, page (3:33709), row 0. Test (ColumnOffsets <= (nextRec - pRec)) failed. Values are 95 and 30. DBCC results for 'Result'. There are 41589306 rows in 660667 pages for object 'Result'. CHECKTABLE found 0 allocation errors and 2 consistency errors in table 'Result' (object ID 1513928615). repair_allow_data_loss is the minimum repair level for the errors found by DBCC CHECKTABLE (LASAR2.dbo.Result ).
Hi all, I want to save DBCC's result into a table to execute my statement but I don't know how to, exmple for DBCC OPENTRAN (my database) - how can I put SPID & UID to my variable from this statement? Thanks in advance Happy New Year PTH
I followed the advice of Paul Randal, but Im stumped as I am not able to determin what the corruption issues are. This is SQL 2000 and the database is a Solomon database that was recently upgraded to 6.5. the error I get when running the DBCC checkdb is as follows:
Server: Msg 8966, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Could not read and latch page (1:18645) with latch type SH. sysindexes failed. DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator. DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
Now, the bad news. I am a bit of a novice and have picked this up from someone who left my company. It appears the latch error has been around for some time and only reared up when I instituted a new back up system that runs a dbcc check befor backing up. I don't think I have any clean backups.
I am wondering if tempdb stores all results tempararily whenever I query a large fact table with over 4 million records which joins another dimension table? Since each time when I run the query, the tempdb grows to nearly 1GB which nearly runs out all the space on my local system drive, as a result the performance totally down. Is there any way to fix this problem? Thanks a lot in advance and I am looking forward to hearing from you shortly for your kind advices.
I cannot create a measure that returns results for dates that do not exist in the fact table despite the fact that the components included in the measure contain valid results for these same dates.Creature a measure that counts the number of days where the "stock qty" is below the "avg monthly sales qty for the last 12 months" (rolling measure).Here is the DAX code I have tried for the measure (note that filter explicitly refers to the date table (called Calendar) and not the fact table):
Below you can see the sub measures (circled in red) are giving results for all days in the calendar.Highlighted in yellow are dates for which the StkOutCnt measure is not returning a result. Having investigated these blank dates, I am pretty confident that they are dates for which there are no transactions in the fact table (weekends, public holidays etc...).why I am getting an "inner join" with my fact table dates despite the fact that this is not requested anywhere in the dax code and that the two sub measures are behaving normally?
I have a database that has had a full text index at some point in it's history - but no longer does. The database is currently at SQL 2012 compatibility, but it was created on SQL2000. It still appears to have a row in the internal table sys.sysftinds - but some of the column values are NULL, and NULLs are not allowed. The database fails DBCC checks because of this.
Msg 8970, Level 16, State 1, Line 2 Row error: Object ID 25, index ID 1, partition ID xxxx, alloc unit ID xxxx (type In-row data), page ID (1:xxxx), row ID 0. Column 'sensitivity' was created NOT NULL, but is NULL in the row. DBCC results for 'sys.sysftinds'.
There are 1 rows in 1 pages for object "sys.sysftinds".
CHECKTABLE found 0 allocation errors and 1 consistency errors in table 'sys.sysftinds' (object ID 25).
repair_allow_data_loss is the minimum repair level for the errors found by DBCC CHECKTABLE (xxxx.sys.sysftinds).
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
Running DBCC with repair_allow_data_loss has not worked.
1) When I run a query Select * from MY_Table the query never completes. If I press cancel in Query Analyzer after 1 second or 2 minutes, it always shows the same 174 records. The total table size is 800 KB with 3148 rows .. according to TaskPad
2) No queries, even queries that would return only 1 record complete execution against that table
3) I am unable to rename the table, if I try to rename the table Enterprise Manager becomes unresponsive and has to be closed.
4) If I try to browse the rows through Enterprise manager by scrolling through the records, it allows me to go down through a number of rows and then Enterprise manager gives me a timeout expired error.
5) I ran a DBCC CheckDB command ran for 1 hr and 7 minutes. It says there are 0 allocation errors and 0 consistency errors in the database.
6) The other database tables seem to be OK and the Database is operational except for calls involving the 1 Table
with actividades_secundarias as ( select a.*, r.Antigo, r.Novo, rn = row_number() over (PARTITION BY a.nif_antigo, r.novo ORDER BY a.nif_antigo) from ACT_SECUNDARIAS a inner join ((select
[Code] ....
I want to make a delete statement like this:
select * into #table1 from actvidades_secundarias where rn>1 Delete from act_secundarias where act_secundarias.nif_antigo = #table1.nif_antigo and act_secundarias.cod_cae = #table1.cod_cae
