Hi, eveyone..
I have a problem.
One of developer deleted Merge Replication Job.
However there is no doc for that replication.
What I want to know is like this:
which tables are in that replication?
Is there any system or user tables track down these replication as well as configuration in that replication?
Thanks in advance:-))
Jay
Hello,
When I reinitialized a subscription from SQL2005 db (publisher) to a SQL 2000 DB (Subscriber) and had the Upload changes before reinitialization turned on, the data from the SQL 2000 db didn't get uploaded. This resulted in a loss of 2 days worth of data.
Does anyone have any idea if there's anywhere that data is kept. (unfortunately a series of errors caused our backups to not be running on the 2000 db either).
Thank You
Bob
There is an error in one of my merge publication. The error is,
The change for the row with article nickname 2336003 (test), rowguidcol {436456F0-F5AD-E411-80CF-5CF3FC1D2D76} could not be applied at the destination. Further information about the failure reason can be found in the conflict logging tables.
When i checked my tables I got following values in rowguid column
publication 436456F0-F5AD-E411-80CF-5CF3FC1D2D76
subscriptionD824D120-23AD-E411-80E3-00155D0E1001
conflict tables 689C6A61-5359-4BB5-BECD-B03F5F94D79A
hi all,
Could we configure a merge replication such as replicate the master table and its all related tables (relation deep could be 1.)
We dont want to manually find master table relations and configure replication for the related tables.
please help for that configuration
kinds
We have merge replication running with anamous subscribers
We have generested lots of views tables and stored procedures like
sp_ins_C435D35DDEC04FE2517CCD52A9024EC4
ctsv_07BA7383A12B4654B4D3A69B3053B227
aonflict_DH_tblReplicationRegion
How do we get rud of these I am concerned it will fill up the publisher database
Can any one advise
I am using merge replication between two servers.
When i insert data into a perticular table ..the data gets deleted after some time.
Anyone faced this problem?
What is the main difference between snapshot and transactional and merge replication?
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi all,
I know that adding a column using ALTER TABLE to add a column automatically allows SQLSERVER 2005 to replicate the schema changes to the subscribers, however, I would like to add a new column to an existing article that is being used for merge replication, however, I don't want this column to be replicated. Re-initialising the subscriptions is not a option. Help would be appreciated.
I am using SQLSERVER 2005 (SP1).
Hello, everyone
If I don’t have any backup for SQL Server 2k on Win 2k, how to recover the deleted tables and database.
Thanks a lot.
ZYT
Hi gurus
Is it possible to recover deleted tables of the database ???
actually the senario is this ... i have delete the tables from the database and then import the same tables from the very old backup set. but unfortunatly the required data is missing in new imported tables ... now i want to recover the tables that i have deleted before the import operation.... please help me to overcome this problem.
thanks
chander
SQL 7 SP2
Are the tables inserted and deleted available from within a sp which is called from a trigger ?
Craig
I was wondering if there is a way to schedule the deletion of temporary tables that are over a certain age. Right now, temporary tables are being created, but unless I delete them manually, they end up building up and just taking up a lot of space.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am reading the WROX "Professional SQL Server 7 Programming" book.
The following code appears on page 424:
CREATE TRIGGER ProductIsRationed
ON Products
FOR UPDATE
AS
IF EXISTS
(
SELECT 'True'
FROM Inserted i
JOIN Deleted d
ON i.ProductID = d.ProductID
WHERE (d.UnitsInStock - i.UnitsInStock) > d.UnitsInStock / 2
AND d.UnitsInStock - i.UnitsInStock > 0
)
BEGIN
RAISERROR('Cannot reduce stock by more than 50%% at once.',16,1)
ROLLBACK TRAN
END
The trigger fires when an UPDATE is made to Products table. The author states that the Inserted and Deleted tables only exist for the life of the trigger, not before, and not after the trigger runs. If this is true, then why would there be any rows in the Deleted table in this case? No rows were
deleted within the trigger. As far as I can see, no rows have been updated
either. If the condition does exist, no rows will be updated, and an error will be displayed. Otherwise, the row will be updated. Then there would be a row in the inserted table. But then the trigger is finished and the inserted table for that trigger disappears. I think my logic is flawed, which is why I am writing. I don't think I fully understand the Inserted and Deleted tables.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Nathan
I want to know how inserted and deleted temp tables in SQL server work. My question is more regarding how they work when multiple users accessing the same database. Suppose two users update the database at the same time. In that case what are the values stored in the inserted and deleted tables.
I have a trigger that records changes to the database as in an audit trail. Like any other audit trail I insert data into my audit table from the inserted and deleted temp tables in MS SQL Server. I however am not clear as to how these inserted and deleted tables store values when two users update the database at the same time. Are there separate inserted and deleted tables for each session. The users access the database thru ASP pages.
The audit trail I am trying to use is http://www.nigelrivett.net/AuditTrailTrigger.html
I actually would like to store the inserted and deleted temp tables into other temporary tables so that I can access these tables thru a stored procedure. This is when the problem of same users updating the temporary tables is more pronounced.
Thanks in advance.
Hi all,
I just ran across an issue on a SQL 2000 sp4 db where RI was being maintained solely with triggers. I am attempting to change the primary key of a parent table and cascade the results to all its children without using the vendor-supplied trigger code (long story...) using an INSTEAD OF trigger.
My question is: does SQL Server create any kind of relationship between the inserted and deleted tables that I could exploit since the key field is unavailable?
I am trying to avoid having to add a surrogate key to each of the children just for this activity (as there are many M rows in each and no other suitable unique column combinations that span all the child tables).
-DC
I'm know the above tables are system generated, am I right in assuming the following.
1) The tables are unique to the current user.
2) The tables only last as long as the transaction that caused their creation
Thanks in advance
Alex
Hello,
I have a stored procedure that's running a little slower than I would like. I've executed the stored proc in QA and looked at the execution plan and it looks like the problem is in a trigger on one of the updated tables. The update on this table is affecting one row (I've specified the entire unique primary key, so I know this to be the case). Within my trigger there is some code to save an audit trail of the data. One of these statements does an update of the history table based on the inserted and deleted tables. For some reason this is taking 11.89% of the batch cost (MUCH more than any other statement) and within this statement 50% of the cost is for a table scan on inserted and 50% is for a table scan on deleted. These pseudo-tables should only contain one record each though.
Any ideas why this would be causing such a problem? I've included a simplified version of the update below. The "or" statements actually continue for all columns in the table. The same trigger template is used for all tables in the database and none of the others seem to exhibit this behavior as far as I can tell.
Thanks for any help!
-Tom.
UPDATE H_MyTable
SET HIST_END_DT = @tran_date
FROM H_MyTable his
INNER JOIN deleted del ON (his.PrimaryKey1 = del.PrimaryKey1) and
(his.PrimaryKey2 = del.PrimaryKey2)
INNER JOIN inserted ins ON (his.PrimaryKey1 = ins.PrimaryKey1) and
(his.PrimaryKey2 = ins.PrimaryKey2)
WHERE (his.HIST_END_DT is null)
and ((IsNull(del.PrimaryKey1, -918273645) <>
IsNull(ins.PrimaryKey1, -918273645)) or
(IsNull(del.PrimaryKey2, -918273645) <>
IsNull(ins.PrimaryKey2, -918273645)) or
(IsNull(del.Column3, -918273645) <>
IsNull(ins.Column3, -918273645)))
I want to compare the before and after values of an UPDATEd column using a trigger. I want to know if the value in the column has changed. Simple? No!
As you know, SqlServer puts the before image of the UPDATEd rows into the DELETED virtual table and the after image of the UPDATEd rows in the INSERTED virtual table.
So you would get the before and after data by doing a SELECT on these tables.
But here is the problem - how do you join the tables? What if there are >1 rows in these 2 tables (because the UPDATE affected >1 rows) - how do i know which "old"/DELETED rows correspond to which "new"/INSERTED?"
Ok - I could join the 2 tables on the primary key, but what if the primary key was updated? In that case the join would not work - the DELETED table would contain the old primary key value and the INSERTED table would contain the new (different) primary key value. In fact, ALL of the columns may have been changed by the UPDATE.
Now, there is another thing to try with triggers - the
IF UPDATE ( <columname> )
test. This is designed to tell you if a specified column was UPDATEd by the last UPDATE. However, this will return TRUE for any UPDATE that mentions the column - even if the UPDATE does not change any data! So I cannot determine whether a certain column has had its value changed with this either.
So then you can try another test mentioned in the docs for CREATE TRIGGER - the
IF COLUMNS_UPDATED()
test. However, this will report that a column has been updated, NOT whether the data has changed as aresult of that UPDATE.
So if you UPDATE the value in the column to the same value as it was beforehand (admittedly, a pointless thing to do, but it could happen in some apps), this fuction will say, yes, this column was updated.
So my question remains - how do I know if the data has changed in a column after an UPDATE, using a trigger?
Any ideas?
I dont know what I am doing wrong. The trigger (see below) is doing what I want it to do when I do this:
INSERT INTO dbo.personal
(personal_id, chef_id,fornamn, efternamn)
VALUES
(40, 100, 'Malin', 'Markusson' , 'Boss')
but when I remove one value, the result in the logtable is NULL:
INSERT INTO dbo.personal
(personal_id, chef_id,fornamn, efternamn)
VALUES
(40, 100, 'Malin', 'Markusson' )
How can I change the trigger so that it will give me the information of the values that have been updated, inserted or deleted when I dontchange all values (just a couple of them)?
My trigger:
CREATE Trigger trigex
ON dbo.personal
FOR insert, update,delete
AS
INSERT INTO logtable (Innan_värde, Ny_värde)
SELECT
rtrim(cast(d.personal_id as varchar)+', '+cast(d.chef_id as varchar)+', '+rtrim(d.efternamn)+', '+ rtrim(d.fornamn)+ ', '+ rtrim(d.titel)),
(cast(i.personal_id as varchar)+', '+cast(i.chef_id as varchar)+', '+rtrim(i.efternamn)+', '+ rtrim(i.fornamn)+ ' '+ rtrim(i.titel))
FROM inserted i full join deleted d on i.personal_id = d.personal_id
My table:
CREATE Table logtable
(Innan_värde varbinary(max),
Ny_värde varbinary(max))
Thank you !
I am working on bringing our disaster recovery site to be a live site. Currently we replicate to one of out servers (server B) with merge replication (from server A). Server A also does one way transactional replication form some table to several other servers including servers at the DR site.
This setup is not going to be fast enough for what we need so I am wondering if a table is receiving merge replication will the merge updates also replicate down the transaction path??
Example...
Server B update a row and merges to Server A. With this update them replicate (via transactional) to Server C??
thanks...
can anybody tell me with an example how to use Inserted and Deleted in Sql Server 2005
View 7 Replies View RelatedPlease i have a question,
I want to use temporary tables to handle my forms child tables data.
My question is after i load the data from #temporary table to my dataset then i will close my database connection.
Does my temporary tables gets dropped off as soon as i do the connection.close.
or do i need to drop the #temporary table by code.
Which one is right.
I know #temporary tables are specific to the users(session)
Thank you very much in advance.
We have an app that uses triggers for auditing. Is there a way to know the order that the records were inserted or deleted? Or maybe a clearer question is.... Can the trigger figure out if it was invoked for a transaction that "inserted and then deleted" a record versus "deleted and then inserted" a record? The order of these is important to our auding.
Thanks!
CB
I have a table that sometimes has modifications to column(s) comprising the primary key [usually "end_date"]. I need to audit changes on this table, and naturally, turned to after triggers.
The problem is that for updates, when the primary key composition changes, I'm not able to relate/join using the primary key - obviously, it no longer matches across INSERTED and DELETED. Now, for a single row update, it's easy to check for updates on PK columns and then deduce what changes were made...
So the real question is: are rows in INSERTED and DELETED always in matching order (1st row in INSERTED corresponds to the 1st row in DELETED...)?
I don't want to put a surrogate key (GUID nor IDENTITY) on the base table if at all possible. INSERT... SELECT from the inserted/deleted tables into a temp table with identity column is fine, and is what I'm currently doing; I would like MVP or product engineer level confirmation that my ordering assumption is correct.
Testing using an identity surrogate key on base table, and selecting from the Ins/del tables, and the temp tables without an order by clause seems to always return in proper order (proper for my purposes). I've tested under SQL 2005 RTM, SP1, SP2, and SP2 "3152".
FYI, I've lost the debate that such auditing is better handled by the application, not the database server...
Aside: why doesn't the ROW_NUMBER() function allow an empty OVER( ORDER BY() ) clause? Will SQL ever expose an internal row_id, at least in the pseudo tables, so we can work around this situation?
Thanks
Mike
Hi folks,
Table:
a int,
b int,
c int,
d text
I need to change my AFTER - Trigger from this (example!):
select * into #ins from inserted
to something like
select *(without Text / nText / image -columns) into #ins from inserted.
So I tried to build a string like this: (using INFORMATIONSCHEMES)
select @sql = 'select a,b,c into #ins from inserted'
exec(@sql)
a,b,c are not of Text, nText or Image datatype.
After executing the trigger, I get an error, that inserted is unknown.
Does anyone know how to solve this ?
Thx.
I would like to wrap the following code in a function and reuse it. Â I use this code in many triggers.
DECLARE @Action as char(1);
SET @Action = (CASE WHEN EXISTS(SELECT * FROM INSERTED) AND EXISTS(SELECT * FROM DELETED)
THEN 'U' Â -- Set Action to Updated.
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT * FROM INSERTED)
THEN 'I' Â -- Set Action to Insert.
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT * FROM DELETED)
THEN 'D' Â -- Set Action to Deleted.
ELSE NULL -- Skip. It may have been a "failed delete". Â Â
END)
Is it possible to write a function and pass the INSERTED and DELETED logical tables to it?
Hi everbody,
I setup the Merge Replication , it is working perfectly. But i have one problem now it is updating both ways. I nedd one way. Any body tell me which parameter i have to change.
Thanks in advance
Hi,
My production box is running on NT4.0,SP6, SQL Server7.0,SP2. We implemented Merge replication. Working fine last 7 months. Last weekend i disabled replication, Successfully removed Distributor and Publishor. After that try add new fileds but won't allowed me. It's give the error message. I Also found Some Conflict_tables found almost 20 tables. All system Tables. Can delete these these tables, if i delete any problem my database.
I added filelds many times but this time i got errors.
Please help me anybody.
I have just installed replication on our production server to Merge Replicate with a Laptop server that will travel from time to time. I have now noticed that we cannot add or change any fields or attributes on the tables which are being replicated (which are all tables in the DB). This is a problem because we are changing and adding columns all of the time. Is there a way around this issue like shutting down the replication service or something? I have been unsuccessful in finding a way around this other than removing replication while we make changes.
Thank you in advance for any help!
I have implemented a Merger replication on our development server and I get a fillowing error when I try to update one of the table in publisher.
"Transaction cannot start while in firehose mode"
What does this mean.
Thank You,
John
Hi,
I read some where that replication has two types conflict resolution, 1. row based and 2. Column based...
If I am right...
Can any one point me how to find out this option and how to set it up....
Thanks,
Mohammed.
Hi all,
I have a merge replication going between 4 servers. The problem is when ever I do some BCP transfer to one of the tables in one of the servers. It puts the data in that table. But that Data does not get replicated to any other server like it should.
Please Advice on what to do. Is there any option I am forgetting to set or something.
Thank you for all your time in advance.
Aziz
I have successfully tried merge replication on single server with 2 databases.
now i want to do the same with different servers,
when i create pull subcription on server 2 which user account should I use?
it is giving log in failure
i tried using windows admin account and also the 'sa' account.
please help me out
thanks