Error While Calling The Roles.AddUserToRole (error Message: Cannot Resolve Collation Conflict For Equal To Operation)

Feb 5, 2006

Hi, I have developed a website in asp.net 2. I have tester it and it is working fine on my computer but when I have uploaded it to my server I'm getting an error message when the user signup. The error occurs when I'm setting the user role to 'members'.

 


Error line > Roles.AddUserToRole(user.UserName,
"members")

 


The strage thig is that it is working on my computer but not on the server. My home computer and the server are running the same software versions and the website database is the same as well.

 


To double check that my code is not generating the error I have lonched 'SQL Query Analizer' and executed the folowing code on my database:

NOTE: In my database I have create the user “teeluk12� and a role “members�

 


aspnet_UsersInRoles_AddUsersToRoles "/", "teeluk12", "members", "5/02/2006 4:44:33 pm"

 


Once again the code is working on my home computer but not on the server. On the server I'm getting the following error:

 


Server: Msg 446, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_AddUsersToRoles, Line 76


Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation.

 

 

 

Does anybody know what could cause the error?

Could it be some permissions that I didn't set on my server?

 

 

Thanks for my help and suggestions...


Regards,


Gonzal

 

View 9 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Error:Cannot Resolve Collation Conflict For Equal To Operation.

Sep 2, 2004

Exception information:System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation.
Who can tell me how to resolve this problem?
Thx

View 3 Replies View Related

Cannot Resolve Collation Conflict For Equal Operation

Aug 10, 2004

Hi, I´m having a critical problem.

I have two databases: persons and cars

In database persons I have a table
named persons_class1 as follows:
person_id char(13) not null [primary key]
name varchar(20) not null

In database cars I have a table
named cars_blue as follows:
car_id char(13) not null [primary key]
model varchar(20) not null
person_id char(13) not null

In my program the initial catalog is: cars
and I´m executing the following SQL:

select cars_blue.model,persons.dbo.persons_class1.name
from cars_blue,persons.dbo.persons_class1
where cars_blue.person_id=persons.dbo.persons_class1.person_id

and the following error occurs:
Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal operation

I also tried like instead of = and the error is:
Cannot resolve collation conflict for like operation

what can I do?

Thanks in advance
Roland

View 1 Replies View Related

Cannot Resolve Collation Conflict For Equal To Operation.

Jul 1, 2004

Anyone bang into that?

RESTORED a 7.0 Datbase CP 52 to a 2k box

Built a "Privacy" db from scratch on 2k box

Looked at some table scripts and got


OHM - sql 7

SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL

Privacy - sql 2k

Latin1_General_CI_AS NULL

[

Ran this and got the error...any help?


select * from privacy..privacy_column p inner join ohm.information_schema.tables t ON p.table_name = t.table_name


Server: Msg 446, Level 16, State 9, Line 1
Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation.

Any ideas?

View 11 Replies View Related

Cannot Resolve Collation Conflict For Equal Operation

Aug 10, 2004

Hi, I´m having a critical problem.

I have two databases: persons and cars

In database persons I have a table
named persons_class1 as follows:
person_id char(13) not null [primary key]
name varchar(20) not null

In database cars I have a table
named cars_blue as follows:
car_id char(13) not null [primary key]
model varchar(20) not null
person_id char(13) not null

In my program the initial catalog is: cars
and I´m executing the following SQL:

select cars_blue.model,persons.dbo.persons_class1.name
from cars_blue,persons.dbo.persons_class1
where cars_blue.person_id=persons.dbo.persons_class1.per son_id

and the following error occurs:
Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal operation

I also tried like instead of = and the error is:
Cannot resolve collation conflict for like operation

what can I do?

Thanks in advance
Roland

View 8 Replies View Related

Cannot Resolve Collation Conflict For Equal To Operation.

Oct 19, 2004

Hi, I have this error when running a query:

Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation.

but the situation is that I can run the query perfectly with one user (windows user) but using an standar user, I've got the error, as far as I know the collation feature applies to db's an objects not to users, what can I do to run this query with the standar user? both users have the same permission on the db. Below is the query attached.

Thank you
Gabriel

SELECT B.EmpSupervisorId, a.Info_ID as A_Info_ID,
ISNULL(a.Owner_SSO_ID,'') as A_Owner_SSO_ID,
ISNULL(a.Ref_SSO_ID,'') as A_Ref_SSO_ID,
ISNULL(a.Prev_Owner_SSO_ID,0) as A_Prev_Owner_SSO_ID,
ISNULL(a.MgmtTypeFlag,0) as A_MgmtTypeFlag,
ISNULL(a.CurrentStatusID, 1) as A_CurrentStatusID,
ISNULL(a.PrevStatusID,0) as A_PrevStatusID,
ISNULL(C.ConTypeOption, '') as C_ConTypeOption,
ISNULL(CAST(a.Last_Status_Update_Date AS VARCHAR),'') as A_Last_Status_Update_Date,
ISNULL(B.sfBUID,'0') as A_Bus_Group_ID, 0 AS A_Bus_Group_Seg_ID,
ISNULL(a.Organization,'') as A_Organization,
ISNULL(a.ContactName,'') as A_ContactName,
ISNULL(A.Title, '') as A_ContactTitle,
ISNULL(a.ContactComName,'') as A_ContactComName, ISNULL(a.Phone,'') as A_Phone,
ISNULL(a.NatureOfOppID,'') as A_NatureOfOppID, ISNULL(a.DealAmount,0) as A_DealAmount, ISNULL(CAST(a.Cust_Contacted_Date AS VARCHAR),'') A_Cust_Contacted_Date, ISNULL(CAST(a.Lead_Qualified_Date AS VARCHAR),'') A_Lead_Qualified_Date, ISNULL(CAST(a.Tran_Processed_Date AS VARCHAR),'') A_Tran_Processed_Date,
ISNULL(CAST(a.Quote_Accepted_Date AS VARCHAR),'') as A_Quote_Accepted_Date,
ISNULL(CAST(a.Approved_By_HFS_Date AS VARCHAR),'') as A_Approved_By_HFS_Date,
ISNULL(CAST(a.Funded_By_HFS_Date AS VARCHAR),'') as A_Funded_By_HFS_Date,
ISNULL(a.Lead_In_Amount,0) as A_Lead_In_Amount,
ISNULL(a.Cust_Contacted_Amount,0) as A_Cust_Contacted_Amount,
ISNULL(a.Lead_Qualified_Amount,0) as A_Lead_Qualified_Amount,
ISNULL(a.Tran_Processed_Amount,0) as A_Tran_Processed_Amount,
ISNULL(a.Quote_Accepted_Amount,0) as A_Quote_Accepted_Amount,
ISNULL(a.Approved_By_HFS_Amount,0) as A_Approved_By_HFS_Amount,
ISNULL(a.Funded_By_HFS_Amount,0) as A_Funded_By_HFS_Amount,
ISNULL(CAST(CreationDate AS VARCHAR),'') as A_CreationDate,
ISNULL(a.BusType,'') as A_BusType,
ISNULL(a.NonHFS_XLink_ContactName,'') as A_NonHFS_XLink_ContactName,
ISNULL(a.NonHFS_XLink_Bus_ID,'0') as A_NonHFS_XLink_Bus_ID,
ISNULL(a.Comments,'') as A_Comments, ISNULL(a.ExistCustomerID,'') as A_ExistCustomerID,
ISNULL(a.FinancialNeedID,'') as A_FinancialNeedID,
ISNULL(a.CampaignID,'') as A_CampaignID,
(GEC_HFS_CORE.dbo.GetBusinessDays(Last_Status_Upda te_Date, getdate())-1) as BusDateDiff, ISNULL(A.DealTypeID, '') as A_DealTypeID
FROM tblInformation a
LEFT OUTER JOIN GEC_HFS_LM_SSOInfo B ON A.Owner_SSO_ID = B.sfSSOID
LEFT OUTER JOIN tblContactType C ON a.Bustype = C.ConType_ID
WHERE a.CurrentStatusID NOT IN (9, 10, 11) AND
ISNULL(a.isNoChange,'NO') = 'NO' AND ISNULL(a.IsDeleted,'NO') = 'NO' AND
DATEDIFF(DAY, Last_Status_Update_Date, GETDATE())<> 0 AND
ISNULL(a.isNonHFS, 'NO') = 'NO'
ORDER BY A_Info_ID

View 3 Replies View Related

Cannot Resolve Collation Conflict For Equal To Operation.

Dec 16, 2005

I've stumbled across the above error and am a little stuck.I've just installed SQL2000 (sp3) on my PC and restored a database fromour Live server. On a simple Update statement on a #temp table, itfails with the above message. I think I understand what it means andfound some old posts suggesting using the following :select name, databasepropertyex(name, 'collation')from master..sysdatabasesselect serverproperty('collation')All of the databases that are there by default are set to'Latin1_General_CI_AS' and the restored db is'SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS'.The live server has all of these set to the 'SQL...' version, but astandard install points to the other. So, how do I change mine to the'newer' setting ? All I need to do is mimic the live environment fortesting and development. There is only me using it, and it's not aproblem to bin it and re-install, or tweak if I need to.I've tried using :ALTER DATABASE Northwind COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_ASas a test (thought this was the best example to show), but it failsstating the following :Server: Msg 5075, Level 16, State 1, Line 5The object 'CK_Products_UnitPrice' is dependent on database collation.Server: Msg 5075, Level 16, State 1, Line 5The object 'CK_ReorderLevel' is dependent on database collation.Server: Msg 5075, Level 16, State 1, Line 5The object 'CK_UnitsInStock' is dependent on database collation.Server: Msg 5075, Level 16, State 1, Line 5The object 'CK_UnitsOnOrder' is dependent on database collation.Server: Msg 5075, Level 16, State 1, Line 5The object 'CK_Discount' is dependent on database collation.Server: Msg 5075, Level 16, State 1, Line 5The object 'CK_Quantity' is dependent on database collation.Server: Msg 5075, Level 16, State 1, Line 5The object 'CK_UnitPrice' is dependent on database collation.Server: Msg 5075, Level 16, State 1, Line 5The object 'CK_Birthdate' is dependent on database collation.Server: Msg 5072, Level 16, State 1, Line 5ALTER DATABASE failed. The default collation of database 'Northwind'cannot be set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS.On the Live server, the Northwind database is set to the 'SQL...'version, so it MUST be do-able somehow.Any pointers would be appreciated.Thanks in advanceRyan

View 7 Replies View Related

Cannot Resolve Collation Conflict For Equal To Operation

Nov 27, 2007



Hi All,

I have collation defined on one column and default on another being used in where clause. How can I resolve this problem without changing collation in table.

Thanks in advance

Niraj

View 1 Replies View Related

Error With Membersip And Roles Cannot Resolve The Collation Conflict Between

May 21, 2007

I'm getting the following errors when trying to execute the following script on the server, its part of the standard asp.net membership and roles, anybody have any ideas how I get get round this?   Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 50
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 58
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 84
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 92
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
  /****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles] Script Date: 05/20/2007 11:23:33 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER OFF
GO
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.objects WHERE object_id = OBJECT_ID(N'[dbo].[aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles]') AND type in (N'P', N'PC'))
BEGIN
EXEC dbo.sp_executesql @statement = N'
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles]
@ApplicationName nvarchar(256),
@UserNames nvarchar(4000),
@RoleNames nvarchar(4000)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @AppId uniqueidentifier
SELECT @AppId = NULL
SELECT @AppId = ApplicationId FROM aspnet_Applications WHERE LOWER(@ApplicationName) = LoweredApplicationName
IF (@AppId IS NULL)
RETURN(2)


DECLARE @TranStarted bit
SET @TranStarted = 0

IF( @@TRANCOUNT = 0 )
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION
SET @TranStarted = 1
END

DECLARE @tbNames table(Name nvarchar(256) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
DECLARE @tbRoles table(RoleId uniqueidentifier NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
DECLARE @tbUsers table(UserId uniqueidentifier NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
DECLARE @Num int
DECLARE @Pos int
DECLARE @NextPos int
DECLARE @Name nvarchar(256)
DECLARE @CountAll int
DECLARE @CountU int
DECLARE @CountR int


SET @Num = 0
SET @Pos = 1
WHILE(@Pos <= LEN(@RoleNames))
BEGIN
SELECT @NextPos = CHARINDEX(N'','', @RoleNames, @Pos)
IF (@NextPos = 0 OR @NextPos IS NULL)
SELECT @NextPos = LEN(@RoleNames) + 1
SELECT @Name = RTRIM(LTRIM(SUBSTRING(@RoleNames, @Pos, @NextPos - @Pos)))
SELECT @Pos = @NextPos+1

INSERT INTO @tbNames VALUES (@Name)
SET @Num = @Num + 1
END

INSERT INTO @tbRoles
SELECT RoleId
FROM dbo.aspnet_Roles ar, @tbNames t
WHERE LOWER(t.Name) = ar.LoweredRoleName AND ar.ApplicationId = @AppId
SELECT @CountR = @@ROWCOUNT

IF (@CountR <> @Num)
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 N'''', Name
FROM @tbNames
WHERE LOWER(Name) NOT IN (SELECT ar.LoweredRoleName FROM dbo.aspnet_Roles ar, @tbRoles r WHERE r.RoleId = ar.RoleId)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN(2)
END


DELETE FROM @tbNames WHERE 1=1
SET @Num = 0
SET @Pos = 1


WHILE(@Pos <= LEN(@UserNames))
BEGIN
SELECT @NextPos = CHARINDEX(N'','', @UserNames, @Pos)
IF (@NextPos = 0 OR @NextPos IS NULL)
SELECT @NextPos = LEN(@UserNames) + 1
SELECT @Name = RTRIM(LTRIM(SUBSTRING(@UserNames, @Pos, @NextPos - @Pos)))
SELECT @Pos = @NextPos+1

INSERT INTO @tbNames VALUES (@Name)
SET @Num = @Num + 1
END

INSERT INTO @tbUsers
SELECT UserId
FROM dbo.aspnet_Users ar, @tbNames t
WHERE LOWER(t.Name) = ar.LoweredUserName AND ar.ApplicationId = @AppId

SELECT @CountU = @@ROWCOUNT
IF (@CountU <> @Num)
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 Name, N''''
FROM @tbNames
WHERE LOWER(Name) NOT IN (SELECT au.LoweredUserName FROM dbo.aspnet_Users au, @tbUsers u WHERE u.UserId = au.UserId)

IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN(1)
END

SELECT @CountAll = COUNT(*)
FROMdbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles ur, @tbUsers u, @tbRoles r
WHERE ur.UserId = u.UserId AND ur.RoleId = r.RoleId

IF (@CountAll <> @CountU * @CountR)
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 UserName, RoleName
FROM @tbUsers tu, @tbRoles tr, dbo.aspnet_Users u, dbo.aspnet_Roles r
WHERE u.UserId = tu.UserId AND r.RoleId = tr.RoleId AND
tu.UserId NOT IN (SELECT ur.UserId FROM dbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles ur WHERE ur.RoleId = tr.RoleId) AND
tr.RoleId NOT IN (SELECT ur.RoleId FROM dbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles ur WHERE ur.UserId = tu.UserId)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN(3)
END

DELETE FROM dbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles
WHERE UserId IN (SELECT UserId FROM @tbUsers)
AND RoleId IN (SELECT RoleId FROM @tbRoles)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
COMMIT TRANSACTION
RETURN(0)
END
'
END
GOAny help appreciated thanks,   

View 5 Replies View Related

Cannot Resolve The Collation Conflict Between SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS And Latin1_General_CI_AS In The Equal To Operatio

May 20, 2008

I hit this error when I tried to do something like:




Code Snippet
create table #tempTable (ID int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL ,
column1 varchar(200) NOT NULL)
INSERT INTO #tempTable
Values('test')
create table tempTable (ID int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL ,
column2 varchar(200) NOT NULL)
INSERT INTO tempTable
Values('test')
Select * from #tempTable t
inner join tempTable p
on t.ID = p.ID
where t.column1 = p.column2






After a thorough search on sysobjects and syscolumns, I found the collation problem on database "temp" is set to "Latin1_General_CI_AS"


since it's an system db, I cannot alter. My db also cannot alter because some SP is encrypted, though I cna de-crypt it.
Is that anyway to solve it by running the script??

I tried to do something like:
start /wait setup.exe /qb INSTANCENAME= {my MSSQL 2005 insatnce name} REINSTALL=SQL_Engine REBUILDDATABASE=SAPWD= {my sa password} SQLCOLLATION=SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AI


but i get no error at Summamry.txt:
Setup succeeded with the installation, inspect the log file completely for status on all the components.

while at "SQLSetup0011__Core.log":

Error: Action "LaunchPatchedBootstrapAction" threw an exception during execution. Error information reported during run:
"C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup Bootstrapsetup.exe" finished and returned: 0
Aborting queue processing as nested installer has completed
Message pump returning: 0

Anyone have any idea?

View 12 Replies View Related

Error Cannot Resolve The Collation Conflict Between

May 21, 2007

I'm getting the following errors when trying to execute the following script on the server, its part of the standard asp.net membership and roles, anybody have any ideas how I get get round this?

Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 50
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 58
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 84
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 92
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.




/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles] Script Date: 05/20/2007 11:23:33 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER OFF
GO
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.objects WHERE object_id = OBJECT_ID(N'[dbo].[aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles]') AND type in (N'P', N'PC'))
BEGIN
EXEC dbo.sp_executesql @statement = N'
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles]
@ApplicationName nvarchar(256),
@UserNames nvarchar(4000),
@RoleNames nvarchar(4000)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @AppId uniqueidentifier
SELECT @AppId = NULL
SELECT @AppId = ApplicationId FROM aspnet_Applications WHERE LOWER(@ApplicationName) = LoweredApplicationName
IF (@AppId IS NULL)
RETURN(2)


DECLARE @TranStarted bit
SET @TranStarted = 0

IF( @@TRANCOUNT = 0 )
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION
SET @TranStarted = 1
END

DECLARE @tbNames table(Name nvarchar(256) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
DECLARE @tbRoles table(RoleId uniqueidentifier NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
DECLARE @tbUsers table(UserId uniqueidentifier NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
DECLARE @Num int
DECLARE @Pos int
DECLARE @NextPos int
DECLARE @Name nvarchar(256)
DECLARE @CountAll int
DECLARE @CountU int
DECLARE @CountR int


SET @Num = 0
SET @Pos = 1
WHILE(@Pos <= LEN(@RoleNames))
BEGIN
SELECT @NextPos = CHARINDEX(N'','', @RoleNames, @Pos)
IF (@NextPos = 0 OR @NextPos IS NULL)
SELECT @NextPos = LEN(@RoleNames) + 1
SELECT @Name = RTRIM(LTRIM(SUBSTRING(@RoleNames, @Pos, @NextPos - @Pos)))
SELECT @Pos = @NextPos+1

INSERT INTO @tbNames VALUES (@Name)
SET @Num = @Num + 1
END

INSERT INTO @tbRoles
SELECT RoleId
FROM dbo.aspnet_Roles ar, @tbNames t
WHERE LOWER(t.Name) = ar.LoweredRoleName AND ar.ApplicationId = @AppId
SELECT @CountR = @@ROWCOUNT

IF (@CountR <> @Num)
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 N'''', Name
FROM @tbNames
WHERE LOWER(Name) NOT IN (SELECT ar.LoweredRoleName FROM dbo.aspnet_Roles ar, @tbRoles r WHERE r.RoleId = ar.RoleId)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN(2)
END


DELETE FROM @tbNames WHERE 1=1
SET @Num = 0
SET @Pos = 1


WHILE(@Pos <= LEN(@UserNames))
BEGIN
SELECT @NextPos = CHARINDEX(N'','', @UserNames, @Pos)
IF (@NextPos = 0 OR @NextPos IS NULL)
SELECT @NextPos = LEN(@UserNames) + 1
SELECT @Name = RTRIM(LTRIM(SUBSTRING(@UserNames, @Pos, @NextPos - @Pos)))
SELECT @Pos = @NextPos+1

INSERT INTO @tbNames VALUES (@Name)
SET @Num = @Num + 1
END

INSERT INTO @tbUsers
SELECT UserId
FROM dbo.aspnet_Users ar, @tbNames t
WHERE LOWER(t.Name) = ar.LoweredUserName AND ar.ApplicationId = @AppId

SELECT @CountU = @@ROWCOUNT
IF (@CountU <> @Num)
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 Name, N''''
FROM @tbNames
WHERE LOWER(Name) NOT IN (SELECT au.LoweredUserName FROM dbo.aspnet_Users au, @tbUsers u WHERE u.UserId = au.UserId)

IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN(1)
END

SELECT @CountAll = COUNT(*)
FROMdbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles ur, @tbUsers u, @tbRoles r
WHERE ur.UserId = u.UserId AND ur.RoleId = r.RoleId

IF (@CountAll <> @CountU * @CountR)
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 UserName, RoleName
FROM @tbUsers tu, @tbRoles tr, dbo.aspnet_Users u, dbo.aspnet_Roles r
WHERE u.UserId = tu.UserId AND r.RoleId = tr.RoleId AND
tu.UserId NOT IN (SELECT ur.UserId FROM dbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles ur WHERE ur.RoleId = tr.RoleId) AND
tr.RoleId NOT IN (SELECT ur.RoleId FROM dbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles ur WHERE ur.UserId = tu.UserId)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN(3)
END

DELETE FROM dbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles
WHERE UserId IN (SELECT UserId FROM @tbUsers)
AND RoleId IN (SELECT RoleId FROM @tbRoles)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
COMMIT TRANSACTION
RETURN(0)
END
'
END
GO




Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

Error In Procedure - Cannot Resolve Collation Conflict

Dec 19, 2013

while using store procedure in report getting error as mentioned below.

Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Fix An Error:Cannot Resolve The Collation Conflict Between Latin1_General_CI_AI And...?

Dec 12, 2007

Hello,

I have a distributed query that uses tables located on in SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server 2000? Does anyone know how I can fix the error below?

Thanks a lot for help!


Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 1

Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.

View 13 Replies View Related

Error In Store Procedure - Cannot Resolve Collation Conflict

Dec 19, 2013

While using store procedure in report getting error as mentioned below !

Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.

View 2 Replies View Related

Create SQL Stored Procedure AddUserToRole Causes Collation Conflict

Oct 25, 2007

For my ASP.net Application on a hosted MSSQL server, i have had to re-ceate using the scripts generated from my local machine using sql tools with SSMSE. This worked beautifully and all appears to work.  My ASP.net application  users can create their accounts and login normally. Unfortunately, my create user wizard does not automatically generate roles for the clients. So, i am using a routine that includes the following Protected Sub CreateWizard1_OnUserCrated(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles CreateUserWizard1.CreatedUser Dim userInfo As MembershipUser = Membership.GetUser(CreateUserWizard1.UserName) userInfo.IsApproved = False Membership.UpdateUser(userInfo) Roles.AddUserToRole(CreateUserWizard1.UserName, "Friends") End Sub which does not work because it is looking for a AddUserToRole stored procedure. This is confusing because it this SP IS on my local version and works fine. So i attemtped to create a new SP called AddUserToRole on the server but get an error message Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_AddUsersToRoles, Line 49 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. (actually it occurs 5 times in the routine). Further research from the various SQL forums and even MSDN points the problem as one of Collation versions - and suggest the answer is to re-install. I was wondering if any might know of a way of changing the collation version . Loking at db properties on my server db has the collation version set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. I do not understand enough about sql to know if changing the version the Stored Procedure wants to use as its default ( which appears to be Latin1_General_CI_AS). ANY IDEAS????? As i have already deleted and re-installed my mssql db, i would rather find an alternative / better solution. many thanks in anticipation. steve

View 1 Replies View Related

Cannot Resolve The Collation Conflict

May 31, 2008

 hi allin my local machine there was no problem. however, when i put my database on the the hosting company's database server i got this error System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException:
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between
"SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AI" in the equal
to operationplease help it's urgent thanks  

View 3 Replies View Related

Conflict In Equal-to-operation

Jul 21, 2006

Hi there,

I am trying to update one table on server A/database A with new records from a server B/database B.

Both databases use the same collation. The key-fields of both table do use the same collation, but not the server.

Help: I was thinking, when both databases and the fields inside the tables do both use the same collation, then there will not upcome any conflict ?

Do I have to adapt the database collation, too ? This would'nt be nice as I am retreiving data from different servers with different server collations...
Anybody else got the same problem ?

Thx in advance

dajm

View 2 Replies View Related

Sql Cannot Resolve Collation Conflict Equals - Comparing Rows And Fileds Between Table1 And View1

Jun 27, 2007

Hello,I currently have Table1 and View1.View1 is a query from 2 or 3 tables that works fine on its own.However in my current query if I try to use it...something like...SELECT a.col1, a.col2, a.col3, b.col1, b.col2, b.col3FROM View1 a JOIN Table1 b on a.col1 = b.col1WHERE a.col2 <b.col2 OR a.col3 <b.col3It throws an error "Server: Msg 446, Level 16, State 9, Line 1 Cannotresolve collation conflict for not equal to operation."Clearly I need to use collation between Table1 and View1, But I dontknow where I need to use "COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP850_CI_AI" andhow? this is the collation set on Table1.Thank you!Yas

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: How To Resolve IP Conflict Error While Server Clustering

Dec 8, 2014

I am practicing on vmware 2 node failover cluster for doing Sql failover clustering understanding.I did proper Ad Dc setup and configured san storage through iscsi software that I downloaded from net.I did target and initiator configuration for san storage on same Domain controller vm.Name of target is Target1 and has two initialtor for node1 and node2.It has two virtual disk assigned Quorumdisk.vhd and sqldisk.vhd.ON vmnode1 I have initialzed and formatted my both disk with proper volume and label.

Node which are participating in cluster are node1 and node2.while my windows clustering went fine,while Sql server installation on node 1,i got error IP Address conflict occured.

my DC has IP address:192.168.1.10
my Node1 is 192.168.1.20
node2:192.168.1.30
Cluster IP address is 192.168.1.35

What has cause this situation.What configuration is needed.How do I troubleshoot this problem as now I can not install my sql for clustering as also gave me Invalid network name error.Is my storage configuration not proper or IP address is in correct?Do I need to put my virtual disk in Clustered shared volume?

View 2 Replies View Related

Help--A Error About Collation Conflict

Mar 22, 2006

UPDATE #TMPC
SET EsaItem = ItemClass
FROM #TMPC A,
dbo.EisAdj_ItemClass_V B
WHERE A.EsaItem = B.ItemClassCODE


This code is part of my procedure. I always get error--Server: Msg 446, Level 16, State 9, Procedure GetAdjDataFromShipment, Line 282
Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation.
when program execute at this section.
I try to add this statement "COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS", but it seems not working. I do not know why!

View 3 Replies View Related

Collation Conflict Error

Oct 24, 2007

Hi,

I am getting the following error message when trying to run a script:
"Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation."

Any help on resolving this would be most appreciated, thanks!

my SQL code is as follows:

CREATEVIEW IP_SLAM_EXTRACT_1
AS
SELECT LEFT(a.provider,3) AS [Trust Code],
CASEWHEN a.practice_code='F86687'THEN 'F86723'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86733'THEN 'F86068'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86677' OR
a.practice_code='F86693'THEN 'F86675'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86714' OR
a.practice_code='F86129'THEN 'F86634'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86050'THEN 'Y00090'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86669' OR
a.practice_code='F86662'THEN 'F86702'
WHEN a.practice_code='F886051' THEN 'F86634'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86059' OR
a.practice_code='F86055'THEN 'F86060'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86690'THEN 'F86637'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86089'THEN 'F86060'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86717' OR
a.practice_code='F86728'THEN 'F86716'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86727' OR
a.practice_code='F86728'THEN 'F86721'
WHEN a.practice_code IS NULL AND
a.postcode NOT IN
(SELECT DISTINCT p.POSTCODE
FROM REPOSITORY..[Exeter PostCode]p)THEN 'Null_not_5NA'
WHEN a.practice_code IS NULL AND
a.postcode IN
(SELECT DISTINCT p.POSTCODE
FROM REPOSITORY..[Exeter PostCode]p)THEN 'Null_5NA'

ELSE a.practice_code END AS [GP Practice],
LEFT(
CASE WHEN a.treatment_function_code LIKE 'mis%' OR
a.treatment_function_code LIKE '?%' OR
a.treatment_function_code LIKE '#%' THEN
a.main_specialty_code
WHEN a.treatment_function_code ='' OR
a.treatment_function_code IS NULL AND
a.main_specialty_code IS NOT NULL THEN
a.main_specialty_code
WHEN a.treatment_function_code ='' OR
a.treatment_function_code IS NULL AND
a.main_specialty_code IS NULL THEN '999'
WHEN a.treatment_function_code LIKE '0%'THEN '999'
ELSE a.treatment_function_code END,3) AS [Specialty Code],
a.hrg_code_calculated AS [HRG Code],
a.local_patient_identifier as [Patient id Code],
a.patient_classificationAS [Pat Class],
a.admission_method AS [Adm Method],
a.spell_discharge_date,
a.consultant_code,
a.diagnosis_primary_icd,
a.gp AS [GP Code],
a.length_of_stay AS [Spell LOS],
--pat_type,
--prv_typ,
a.spell_special_service AS Spell_Service_ID,
a.date_of_birth,
a.administrative_category,
a.cds_type
--FROMSUS_5NA_NEW_0607 a--
FROM SUS_apc_5NA_view a
WHEREa.fin_month < 4
AND a.fin_year = 2008
ANDa.main_episode='M'
ANDa.pbr_exclusion IS NULL
ANDa.pct_calculated = '5NA'
ANDa.commissioner LIKE '5NA%'
ANDa.Spell_Discharge_Date<'30/06/2007'

View 10 Replies View Related

Error In Sql Server Collation Conflict

Jun 26, 2007

I am facing the Follwing error:
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_BIN" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.

Follwing is my Code:
code]select * from #temp_Table a
where ltrim(rtrim(Model_ID))+''+ltrim(rtrim(Set_Serial_Number)) in
(select ltrim(rtrim(b.Model_SerialNo)) from #temp_Table2 b where b.Auto_Id=1)[[/code]

So Please help me to proper solutions
Thank's

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server Error Message - Operating System Error 10038: An Operation Was Attempted On Something That Is Not A Socket...

Nov 20, 2006

My apologies...I wasn't for sure where to post an error like this...

Over the last 2 months I have gotten this SQL Server error (twice). All existing processes will continue to work, however no new processes can be created and users cannot connect to the server. This is the exact text of the message in the SQL Server error log.

Operating system error 10038: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket...

Error: 17059, Severity: 18, State: 0

Error accepting connection request via Net-Library 'SSNETLIB'. Execution continuing.

Error: 17882, Severity: 18, State:

While we can typically just stop SQL Server Service and restart the services...I have found it is best to restart the machine during non-production times to take care of any 'residual' effects of this error.

The SQL Server 2000 SP4 box with Windows 2003 Standard SP1 is well maintained by our I.T. team and it typically will run 4 or 5 months without a reboot.



Thank you...

...cordell...

View 5 Replies View Related

Query Error: Collation Conflict (on Tables On 2 Different Servers)

Jun 30, 2005

Hi all,



I have a query that I need to run where I join two tables that both
reside on different servers. I use an INNER JOIN statement to attempt
to join these tables, but for some reason I am getting the following
error message...

"

Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation."


The query is as follows...

SELECT    TABLE_NAME, LEFT(TABLE_NAME, CHARINDEX('_', TABLE_NAME + '_') - 1) AS Abbreviation
FROM     mrcsmis.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
INNER JOIN DEVELCAD1.Portal.dbo.dnl_db_names_log AS imp ON (imp.dnl_table_name = TABLE_NAME)
WHERE     (TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE')

Thanks

Tryst

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005: Collation Conflict Error When Selecting Database Properties

Mar 27, 2006

I have just upgraded to SQL Server 2005 from SQL Server 2000.In Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio, when I click on databaseproperties, I receive the following error:-Cannot resolve the collation conflict between"Latin1_General_CI_AS"and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.(Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 468)Some reference suggest that I can change the database collation byclicking database properties!What can I do?

View 21 Replies View Related

Working Since Morning, Simple Error But Unable To Resolve, ERROR : 26 , Please Help

Dec 15, 2006

dear friends,
 i started using Asp.net for developing webparts, web parts automatically connect to a database to be created and saved in the database.
i had already Sql Server 2005 Express Edition installed so my webpart page ran and automatically created the database "AspNetDb" in the "App_Data" folder.
but when i uninstalled Sql Server 2005 Express Edition and then installed the Sql Server 2005 Enterprise Edition, it gave me the following Error 26 as below :

--------------------------------------------------------- Beginning of Error Message -------------------------------------------------- 
 An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server.  When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified)
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. SQLExpress database file auto-creation error:
The connection string specifies a local Sql Server Express instance using a database location within the applications App_Data directory. The provider attempted to automatically create the application services database because the provider determined that the database does not exist. The following configuration requirements are necessary to successfully check for existence of the application services database and automatically create the application services database:

If the applications App_Data directory does not already exist, the web server account must have read and write access to the applications directory. This is necessary because the web server account will automatically create the App_Data directory if it does not already exist.
If the applications App_Data directory already exists, the web server account only requires read and write access to the applications App_Data directory. This is necessary because the web server account will attempt to verify that the Sql Server Express database already exists within the applications App_Data directory. Revoking read access on the App_Data directory from the web server account will prevent the provider from correctly determining if the Sql Server Express database already exists. This will cause an error when the provider attempts to create a duplicate of an already existing database. Write access is required because the web server accounts credentials are used when creating the new database.
Sql Server Express must be installed on the machine.
The process identity for the web server account must have a local user profile. See the readme document for details on how to create a local user profile for both machine and domain accounts.
--------------------------------------------------------- End of Error Message -------------------------------------------------- 
then when i checked the Machine.config file, i found this....
  <connectionStrings>    <add name="LocalSqlServer" connectionString="data source=.SQLEXPRESS;Integrated Security=SSPI;AttachDBFilename=|DataDirectory|aspnetdb.mdf;User Instance=true" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />  </connectionStrings>
then i thought it's becoz, of the datasource thing that the Machine.Config file supports by default the default free edition of Sql Server 2005 which is the Sql Server 2005 Express Edition.
but friend in my company we use Sql Server 2005 Enterprise Edition, so can anybody pls guide me and get me out of this soup on helping me to use Sql Server 2005 Enterprise Edition by modifying either 1) Machine.Config File and/or  2) Web.Config file and/or 3) any other way, but please help i want to do this, please......
regards and thanks
Gurjit Singh 

View 2 Replies View Related

Resolve Conflict

Apr 10, 2006

Hi,

l've a raw data which contains list of device name and # of wires used, i.e.
DEVICE NAME # of Wires
--------------------- -------------
A 10
B 11
C 17
D 5
A 0
E 0

So l would like to import these data into my table (with device name as primary key) which each device only appear once. If the device name appear twices, then l should ignore device with # of wires = 0. If device name appear twice and # of wires <> 0, then l should log it.

How should l do that in SSIS ?

View 2 Replies View Related

[File System Task] Error: An Error Occurred With The Following Error Message: Access To The Path Is Denied

Sep 7, 2007

Hi -

I have an File System Task that copies a file from one directory ot another. When I hard code the target directory (c:dirfile.txt) it works fine. When I change it to a virtual directory (\serverdirfile.txt) I get a security error:

[File System Task] Error: An error occurred with the following error message: "Access to the path '\gracehbtest oS2TMM_Live_Title_000002.xml' is denied.".

Where do I change the security settings?

Thanks - Grace

View 5 Replies View Related

[XML Task] Error: An Error Occurred With The Following Error Message: There Are Multiple Root Elements.

Aug 18, 2006

I'm trying to use an XML Task to do a simple XSLT operation, but it fails with this error message:

[XML Task] Error: An error occurred with the following error message: "There are multiple root elements. Line 5, position 2.".

The source XML file validates fine and I've successfully used it as the XML Source in a data flow task to load some SQL Server tables. It has very few line breaks, so the first 5 lines are pretty long: almost 4000 characters, including 34 start-tags, 19 end-tags, and 2 empty element tags. Here's the very beginning of it:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ESDU releaselevel="2006-02" createdate="26 May 2006"><package id="1" title="_standard" shorttitle="_standard" filename="pk_stan" supplementdate="01/05/2005" supplementlevel="1"><abstract><![CDATA[This package contains the standard ESDU Series.]]></abstract>

There is only 1 ESDU root element and only 1 package element.

Of course, the XSLT stylesheet is also an XML document in its own right. I specify it directly in the XML Task:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"/>

<xsl:template name="identity" match="@*|node()">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>

<xsl:template match="kw">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="@*"/>
<xsl:attribute name="ihs_cats_seq" select="position()"/>
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>

</xsl:stylesheet>


Its 5th line is the first xsl:template element.

What is going on here? I do not see multiple root elements in either the XML document or the XSLT stylesheet.

Thanks!

View 5 Replies View Related

Collation Conflict

Oct 28, 2007

why do i get collation conflict when i used temp table ??Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.i solved it by using COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS (the column name)will i have collation conflicts again when i put my web app on a web hosting company?? 

View 3 Replies View Related

Collation Conflict

Mar 2, 2006

Hi all,

I have a db server which was installed with Collation 'SQL_Latin_General_CP1_CS_AS' and now I have to replace this server with a new server and I want to install this server with Collation 'SQL_Latin_General_CP1_CI_AS'.

I am using Linked Servers to collect some data from my Sybase database which has "Code Page 850 (Multilingual) character set,us_english,Binary ordering, for use with Code Page 850 (cp850)."

But with new SQL server(case-insensitive settings), I am unable to run a select query (joining a local server and sybase server) and I get an error message "cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation"

I have tried changing property of linked server by specifying Remote server collation to true and Collation Name as 'SQL_Latin_General_CP1_CS_AS' as well as 'SQL_Latin_General_CP850_Bin' but I do get the same error message.

Could any of you please help me in this regard ?

Thanks in advance.

Wilson

Edit: Sorted out. Somehow it is working now after specifying Remote server collation to true and Collation Name as 'SQL_Latin_General_CP1_CS_AS'

View 1 Replies View Related

Collation Conflict (DHL)

Aug 8, 2007

Moving code from Sybase to SQL Server 2005. I have two tables. One table (vINID) is reset and populated right before this code runs. The other table (vINPA) is a table in the database used by the Front End App. This is the error I get when I try and run on our SQL Server 2005.

Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 1
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_BIN" in the equal to operation.

Here is the SQL code:

SELECT DISTINCT
vINID.BLEI_CK,
vINID.BLIV_ID,
ISNULL(vINPA.RCPT_AMT,0) AS RCPT_AMT

FROM Reporting_DEV.dbo.RPT_04597_INID AS vINID -- table re-populated

LEFT JOIN fauafpr0_pids.dbo.CDS_INPA_PMT_ACT AS vINPA
ON vINPA.BLIV_ID = vINID.BLIV_ID

WHERE vINID.BLIV_ID = '071600007594'

Thank you for your help.
David

View 3 Replies View Related

Collation Conflict

Apr 5, 2007

While I execute one query its showing this error:
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Arabic_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.

Can help me please!

Shaji

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved