Hi, I have a unique problem that I am currently unable to figure out. I need to populate a where clause in a SQL statement that has multiple values, however those values always change because they are in another table. The end result that I want to end up with is a list of subs that belong to all of the UCI's that were selected for a particular bid number.
I have the following tables
tblBid with two columns. Bid_ID, and Uci_ID . This table contains multlple rows with the same Bid_ID but the Uci_ID is never the same for the current Bid_id. For example. If I had a Bid_ID of 123, I might have mutliple records listing
bid_id Uci_id
123 1000
123 2000
123 1050
tblSubs_By_Uci that has two columns. Sub_ID, and Uci_ID . This talbe contains a list of Uci_id's that Subs belong to. So I will have only multiple Sub_id and mulitple UCI_ID's because a sub can belong to mulitple Uci_ID's.
Uci_ID Sub_ID
1000 456
1000 2345
2000 456
1050 2345
2000 2345
This is the statement I am using to return the Uci's from the Bid table with bid_id of 123. For example. when I run the following sql statement, it will list all of the UCI's for bid_id 123. SELECT Uci_ID from tblBid where Bid_ID = 123 . That produces a list of UCI's. Now I want to find each sub that belongs to each of the UCI's using that list.
SELECT Sub_ID from tblSubs_BY_UCI where Uci_ID = (SELECT Uci_ID from tblBid WHERE Bid_ID = 123) . I of course get an error from sql saying that I can not pass multiple values to the Where clause.
Can someone please help point me in the right direction. I have been searching on the net for days trying to figure this out. I am open to any suggestions.
First of all I€™m a VB beginner, real beginner, like today is my first time hahaha My problem is that I don€™t know how to put my question into VB code. Here goes. I€™m working in Visual Studio and Reporting Services with a chart. I have a chart that shows the amount of trips an opportunity has in my CRM system. The opportunity goes from Open to Won €¦ or lost but I don€™t want to see those.
What I want to do in this chart is to separate all the Open Opportunities from the Won ones. I want to use a Stacked Column chart so Open Opportunities is on the upper part and Won is on the lower part of the column of course.
I can get the trips data from the CRM database, but I don€™t know how to put it in VB code €œSum the trips where Opportunity=Won€? for one series and for the other €œSum the trips where Opportunity=Open€?. In the database I have fields like statecodename='Won'. So far I have in the Data Values, were I write my expression: Opportunity Open Trips €¦ =Sum(Fields!trips.Value) And the same for Opportunities Won Trips €¦ but that isn€™t right of course.
So how do I say €œ=Sum(Fields!trips.Value) €¦ Where statecodename='Won'€??
I've search around quite extensively on the net and found a few examples that touch on this subject, but the only definitive one that seemed to solve this problem used a temp table in the UDF, which, to my knowledge, is impossible...
The problem is thus: I want to create either a stored procedure or a user defined function to return a list of values I can intersperse to use in a WHERE AccountID IN (<values>). This way, if someone were to create a new stored procedure and they wanted to either only select accounts with those IDs or perform a NOT IN and use it to filter.
The Solution I'm attempting: My idea is best represented in psuedo-code: - Create a Function that stores all account Ids we relate to a particular account type, in this case, let's say accountsids "100, 101, 102, 407" are all accounts we want to consider "cash". - The function would look something like: CREATE FUNCTION CashAccountIDs()
RETURNS TABLE
AS
BEGIN DECLARE TABLE @t1 (account INT) INSERT INTO @t1 VALUES (100) INSERT INTO @t1 VALUES (101) INSERT INTO @t1 VALUES (102) INSERT INTO @t1 VALUES (407) RETURN @t1 END
Then I could call this function by doing something such as:
SELECT * FROM Accounts WHERE AccountId IN (dbo.CashAccountIds())
I would presumably do this for other collections of accounts as well, so that I would end up with say 5 functions I could call to filter various types of accounts.
Not too certain if I am approaching this the correct way or not, I've been receiving a myriad of errors trying different methods. If I use the function above it tells me "Must declare @t1", so I modified it so @t1 is declared in the RETURNS statement, and the syntax checks then work, but when I attempt to save the function it tells me "Cannot perform alter on fn_cashaccountids because it is an incompatible object type"
(The code I use to generate this error is: CREATE FUNCTION fn_cashaccountids ()
RETURNS @t1 TABLE (i INT)
AS
BEGIN INSERT INTO @t1 VALUES (100) RETURN END
Hopefully I've provided enough but not too much info to sift through, it seems to me this would be something encountered a bit before.
This can be achieved with inner join, no problem. Pretty simple.
However, there's a catch =)
DocParty.Role can have four different values in the 'where' clause. Is there a way to fetch all of these four values without returning four duplicates with only one field differing?
There are multiple fields in the query that are to be fetched in similar ways. Therefore, using a IN('value1','value2','value3','value4') would increase the number of selected rows a lot.
In addition, there is another type of condition that needs to be fullfilled.
Basically, there two fields in the 'main' table that are joined to the same field in another table with different conditions. Can this be fetched with the same row as all the other data without duplicates?
Should I use a view somehow? How can I construct a view with these complex conditions if I can't construct an SQL query, that would return no duplicates (pseudo-du
hi friends,i need to select some of the employees from the EmpMaster using in clause. I tried to pass a string with the comma delemeters. it didn't produce all the records except the first in that string.shall i try with string functions in TSQL or any other options? Thanks and Regads,Senthilselvan.D
Hi all My query has some inner joins to some tables. And problem is when any ON clause get null as value, the correspondent record is not displayed. SELECTTableA.A, TableB.AFROM TableAINNER JOIN TableB ON TableA.A = TableB.A What I did try: SELECTTableA.A, TableB.AFROM TableAINNER JOIN TableB ON TableA.A = TableB.A OR TableA.A IS NULL (but It generates redundant values from TableB) I need to show all values even that value from Tablea is null Thank a lot for any help
I have a gridview that is based on the selection(s) in a listbox. The gridview renders fine if I only select one value from the listbox. I recive this error though when I select more that one value from the listbox: Syntax error converting the nvarchar value '4,1' to a column of data type int. If, however, I hard code 4,1 in place of @ListSelection (see below selectCommand WHERE and IN Clauses) the gridview renders perfectly. <asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSourceAll" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString %>" SelectCommand="SELECT DISTINCT dbo.Contacts.Title, dbo.Contacts.FirstName, dbo.Contacts.MI, dbo.Contacts.LastName, dbo.Contacts.Suffix, dbo.Contacts.Dear, dbo.Contacts.Honorific, dbo.Contacts.Address, dbo.Contacts.Address2, dbo.Contacts.City, dbo.Contacts.StateOrProvince, dbo.Contacts.PostalCode FROM dbo.Contacts INNER JOIN dbo.tblListSelection ON dbo.Contacts.ContactID = dbo.tblListSelection.contactID INNER JOIN dbo.ListDescriptions ON dbo.tblListSelection.selListID = dbo.ListDescriptions.ID WHERE (dbo.tblListSelection.selListID IN (@ListSelection)) AND (dbo.Contacts.StateOrProvince LIKE '%') ORDER BY dbo.Contacts.LastName"> <SelectParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="ListSelection" DefaultValue="1"/> </SelectParameters> </asp:SqlDataSource> The selListID column is type integer in the database. I'm using the ListBox1_selectedIndexChanged in the code behind like this where I've tried using setting my selectparameter using the label1.text value and the Requst.From(ListBox1.UniqueID) value with the same result:
Protected Sub ListBox1_SelectedIndexChanged(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles ListBox1.SelectedIndexChanged Dim Item As ListItem For Each Item In ListBox1.Items If Item.Selected Then If Label1.Text <> "" Then Label1.Text = Label1.Text + Item.Value + "," Else Label1.Text = Item.Value + "," End If End If Next Label1.Text = Label1.Text.TrimEnd(",") SqlDataSourceAll.SelectParameters("ListSelection").DefaultValue = Request.Form(ListBox1.UniqueID) End Sub What am I doing wrong here? Thanks!
I want to have a FromDateTextBox and a ToDateTextBox where the user can enter in dates (most likely in mm/dd/yy format, although intelligently handing other formats might be a plus). Then I want to use these dates as the basis for a WHERE clause like:<some sql...> WHERE start_date BETWEEN 'FromDateTextBox.Text' AND 'ToDateTextBox.Text' (Note this WHERE clause will be used as the basis for an SqlDataSource FilterExpression). 1. I believe the date strings need to be in the format 'yyyy-mm-dd' to search SQL server is this correct?2. What's a decent way to convert the strings from the textboxes to the required format?3. How can I avoid an SQL injection attack?
Hi! Has anyone experienced this problem? Certain queries that work fine in SQL 6.5 and Oracle return inconsistent / inaccurate results in SQL 7 (with SP1). These queries include an IN clause with a range of values. For example, the following query: SELECT columnA, columnB, columnC, columnD FROM table WHERE columnD = 'I' AND columnA IN (1,2,3,11,19) go
returns a different result than this query: SELECT columnA, columnB, columnC, columnD FROM table WHERE columnD = 'I' AND columnA IN (1,3,11,2,19) go
The only way we have stumbled upon to get accurate results consistently is to order the range values from largest to smallest: AND columnA IN (19,11,3,2,1)
Have not seen this documented anywhere. We are in the process of re-ordering these ranges in our code, but I welcome any ideas or comments... Thanks!
I created a stored procedure like the following in the hope that I can pass mulitple company_id to the select statement:
CREATE PROC sp_test @in_company_code nvarchar(1024) AS
select company_code, name, description from member_company where company_code in (@in_company_code)
However, I tried the following :
exec sp_test 'abc', 'rrd', 'bbc'
Procedure or function sp_test has too many arguments specified.
and SQLServer doesn't like it.
Did I specify this stored procedure correct? If so, how can I can pass multiple values to the stored procedure then to the sql statement? If not, is it possible to specify a stored procedure like this?
Hi, I am using a SQL back end to dynamically populate an asp.net report/page. As the data I'm interrogating is created from a tree control, I'm having to use a recursive function to retrieve the data into a series of ID values. This all happens at the moment in a DataTable manipulated with c# code. So my ID values end up in this datatable. My problem is that I am then performing a crosstab query in SQL Server 2000 and these ID are required as part of that query. Should I create a temp table and join this into the query or should i feed in a series of ID values into a where clause? Any help gratefully appreciated. Thanks. John
I have created a ssrs report which connects to vertica database through odbc connection. When I try to pass parameter value through parameter (e.g.: column name IN (@parameter) ) then getting error message in query designer prompting "Error in list of values in IN clause. Unable to parse query text. ". Using sql server 2012 , visual studio 2010 version and HP Vertica 7.1 .Â
Result (While I am selecting 'Yes' in dropdown) ---------------------------------------------- incident_id usr_id item_id 10059926 191 61006 10054444 222 3232
SELECT incident.incident_id,incident.usr_id,incident.item_id FROM incident where exists (How i can write query here to check the act_type_sc=ADD_ATTCHMNTS is exists)
I understand that Multi-Select Parameters are converted behind the scenes to an In Clause when a report is executed. The problem that I have is that my multi-select string parameter is turned into an in claused filled with nvarchar/unicode expressions like:
Where columnName in (N'Value1', N'Value2', N'Value3'...)
This nvarchar / unicode expression takes what is already a fairly slow-performing construct and just drives it into the ground. When I capture my query with Profiler (so I can see the In Clause that is being built), I can run it in Management Studio and see the execution plan. Using N'Values' instead of just 'Value1', 'Value2','Value3' causes the query performance to drop from 40 seconds to two minutes and 40 seconds. It's horrible. How can I make it stop!!!?
Is there any way to force the query-rewriting process in Reporting Services to just use plain-old, varchar text values instead of forcing each value in the list to be converted on the fly to an Nvarchar value like this? The column from which I am pulling values for the parameter and the column that I am filtering are both just plain varchar.
I have a quite big SQL query which would be nice to be used using UNION betweern two Select and Where clauses. I noticed that if both Select clauses have Where part between UNION other is ignored. How can I prevent this?
I found a article in StackOverflow saying that if UNION has e.g. two Selects with Where conditions other one will not work. [URL] ....
I have installed SQL Server 2014 and I tried to use tricks mentioned in StackOverflow's article but couldn't succeeded.
Any example how to write two Selects with own Where clauses and those Selects are joined with UNION?
Hi, can anyone shed some light on this issue?SELECT Status from lupStatuswith a normal query it returns the correct recordcountSELECT Status from lupStatus GROUP BY Statusbut with a GROUP By clause or DISTINCT clause it return the recordcount= -1
ON dbo.Track_ID.SM_ID = dbo.transactions.sm_session_id
GROUP BY dbo.Track_ID.TrackID
)
) Once moved to SQL Server 2005 the statement would not return and showed SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD to be the waittype when executed. This machine is SP1 and needs to be upgraded to SP2, something that is not going to happen near time.
I changed the SQL to the following, SQL Server now runs it in under a second, but now the app is not functioning correctly. Are the above and the following semantically the same?
UPDATE dbo.Track_ID
SET dbo.Track_ID.Processed = 4 --Regular 1 leg call thats been completed
1) Rows ordered using textual id rather than numeric id
Code Snippet select cast(v.id as nvarchar(2)) id from ( select 1 id union select 2 id union select 11 id ) v order by v.id
Result set is ordered as: 1, 11, 2 I expect: 1,2,11
if renamed or removed alias for "cast(v.id as nvarchar(2))" expression then all works fine.
2) SQL server reject query below with next message
Server: Msg 169, Level 15, State 3, Line 16 A column has been specified more than once in the order by list. Columns in the order by list must be unique.
Code Snippet select cast(v.id as nvarchar(2)) id from ( select 1 id union select 2 id union select 11 id ) v cross join ( select 1 id union select 2 id union select 11 id ) u order by v.id ,u.id
Again, if renamed or removed alias for "cast(v.id as nvarchar(2))" expression then all works fine.
It reproducible on
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039 (Intel X86) May 3 2005 23:18:38 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)
and
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.3042.00 (Intel X86) Feb 9 2007 22:47:07 Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)
In both cases database collation is SQL_Latin1_General_CP1251_CS_AS
If I check quieries above on database with SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS collation then it works fine again.
Could someone clarify - is it bug or expected behaviour?
I am using web developer 2008, while connecting to I wanted to fetch data from Lotus notes database file, for this i used notesql connector, while connectiong to notes database i am fetting error
ERROR [42000] [Lotus][ODBC Lotus Notes]Table reference has to be a table name or an outer join escape clause in a FROM clause
I have already checked that database & table name are correct, please help me out How i can fetch the lotus notes data in my asp.net pages.
I am using web developer 2008, while connecting to I wanted to fetch data from Lotus notes database file, for this i used notesql connector, while connectiong to notes database i am fetting error
ERROR [42000] [Lotus][ODBC Lotus Notes]Table reference has to be a table name or an outer join escape clause in a FROM clause
I have already checked that database & table name are correct, please help me out How i can fetch the lotus notes data in my asp.net pages.
what is differance between conditions put in ON clause and in WHERE clause in JOINS????
see conditions that shown in brown color
select d1.SourceID, d1.PID, d1.SummaryID, d1.EffectiveDate, d1.Audit, d1.ExpirationDate, d1.Indicator from[DB1].[dbo].[Implicit] d1 inner join [DB2].[dbo].[Implicit] d2 on d1.SummaryID=d2.SummaryID AND d1.ListType = d2.ListType AND (d1.EffectiveDate <= d2.ExpirationDate or d2.ExpirationDate is null) AND (d1.ExpirationDate >= d2.EffectiveDate or d1.ExpirationDate is null) whered1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID AND (d1.SourceID<>d2.SourceID OR (d1.SourceID IS NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NOT NULL) OR (d1.SourceID IS NOT NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NULL) )
select d1.SourceID, d1.PID, d1.SummaryID, d1.EffectiveDate, d1.Audit, d1.ExpirationDate, d1.Indicator from[DB1].[dbo].[Implicit] d1 inner join [DB2].[dbo].[Implicit] d2 on d1.SummaryID=d2.SummaryID AND d1.ImplicitID = d1.ImplicitIDAND d1.ListType = d2.ListType AND (d1.EffectiveDate <= d2.ExpirationDate or d2.ExpirationDate is null) AND (d1.ExpirationDate >= d2.EffectiveDate or d1.ExpirationDate is null) whered1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID AND (d1.SourceID<>d2.SourceID OR (d1.SourceID IS NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NOT NULL) OR (d1.SourceID IS NOT NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NULL) )
another thing...
if we put AND d1.ImplicitID = d1.ImplicitID condition in second query then shall we remove d1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID from WHERE clause????
Hi everyone, I saw some queries where SQL inner join clause and the where clause is used at the same time. I knew that "on" is used instead of the "where" clause. Would anyone please exaplin me why both "where" and "on" clause is used in some sql Select queries ?
How to count the number of values that exist in a row based on the values from an array of numbers. Basically the the array of numbers I want to look for are in row 1 of table [test 1] and I want to search for them and count the "out of" in table [test 2]. Excuse me for not using the easiest way to convey my question below. I guess in short I have 10 numbers and like to find how many of those numbers exist in each row. short example:
I am trying to think my way through a solution which I believe others have probably come across... I am trying to implement a matching routine wherein I need to match an address against a high value and a low value (or, for that matter an input date vs. a start and end date) to return the desired row ... i.e. if I were to use a straight vb program I would just use the following lookup:
" WHERE zip_code = @zip_code AND addr_prim_lo <= @street_number AND addr_prim_hi >= @street_number " & _
" AND addr_prim_oe = @addr_prim_oe AND street_pre = @street_pre AND street_name = @street_name " & _
" AND street_suff = @street_suff AND street_post = @street_post " & _
" AND (expiry_date = '' OR expiry_date = '00000000' OR expiry_date > @expiry_date)" & _
" GROUP BY fire_ID, police_ID, fire_opt_in_out, police_opt_in_out"
My question, then, is how would you perform this type of query using a lookup / merge join or script? I have not found a way to implement a way to set the input columns? I can set the straight matches without a problem, i.e. lookup zip code = input zip code, but can't think of the correct way to set comparisons, i.e. lookup value 1 <= input value AND lookup value 2 >= input value
I have a DTSX package which reads values from a fixed-length text file using a data reader and writes some of the column values from the file to an Oracle table. We have used this DTSX several times without incident but recently the process started inserting NULL values for some of the columns when there was a valid value in the source file. If we extract some of the rows from the source file into a smaller file (i.e 10 rows which incorrectly returned NULLs) and run them through the same package they write the correct values to the table, but running the complete file again results in the NULL values error. As well, if we rerun the same file multiple times the incidence of NULL values varies slightly and does not always seem to impact the same rows. I tried outputting data to a log file to see if I can determine what happens and no error messages are returned but it seems to be the case that the NULL values occur after pulling in the data via a Data Reader. Has anyone seen anything like this before or does anyone have a suggestion on how to try and get some additional debugging information around this error?
I am working with a data set containing several years' of monetary values. I have entries for past dates and the associated values, and I also have entries for future dates. I need to populate the values of the future date records with the values from the same date the previous year. Is there any way this can be done in Power Pivot?
I have to use the above comma separated values into a SQL Search query whose datatype is integer. How would i do this Search query in the IN Operator of SQL Server. My query is :
declare @id varchar(50) set @id= '3,4,6,7' set @id=(select replace(@id,'''',''))-- in below select query Id is of Integer datatype select *from ehsservice where id in(@id)
But this query throws following error message:
Conversion failed when converting the varchar value '3,4,6,7' to data type int.
