Hello,I'm getting the following error message when I try add a row using aStored Procedure."The identity range managed by replication is full and must be updatedby a replication agent".I read up on the subject and have tried the following solutionsaccording to MSDN without any luck.(http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/304706 )sp_adjustpublisheridentityrange (http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa239401(SQL.80).aspx ) has no effectFor Testing:I've reloaded everything from scratch, created the pulications from byrunning the sql scripts generated,created replication snapshots andstarted the agents.I've checked the current Identity values in the Agent Table:DBCC CHECKIDENT ('Agent', NORESEED)Checking identity information: current identity value '18606', currentcolumn value '18606'.I check the Table to make sure there will be no conflicts with theprimary key:SELECT AgentID FROM Agent ORDER BY AgentID DESC18603 is the largest AgentID in the table.Using the Table Article Properties in the Publications PropertiesDialog, I can see values of:Range Size at Publisher: 100,000Range Size at Subscribers: 100New range @ percentage: 80In my mind this means that the Publisher will assign a new range whenthe Current Indentity value goes over 80,000?The Identity range for this table cannot be exhausted! I'm not surewhat to try next.Please! any insight will be of great help!Regards,Bm
In a multi-user environment, I would like to get a list of Idsgenerated, similar to:declare @LastId intselect @LastId = Max(Id) From TableManiaINSERT INTO TableMania (ColumnA, ColumnB)SELECT ColumnA, ColumnB From OtherTable Where ColumnC > 15--get entries just addedSELECT * FROM TableMania WHERE Id > @LastIdThe above works fine, except I'm assuming it will not work in amulti-user environment. Is there any way to get the set of Ids thatwere just added in the previous statement (similar to @@IDENTITY)without doing all of this in a serializable transaction or making atemp table of every single Id before the insert statement?
I have a report which has four tables in it. But I have only one Dataset. Since this dataset has more then 30 fields, I have divided this into four tables to be shown in a report. This will help the user to take print of the report and place each print out side by side for view.
Showing each table in a new page is just fine. It works. But when we take print out some times rows of second table are printed in same page that shows rows of first table.
With this user can not put each print out side by side for view.
Is there any way to set option like print each table in new page? I mean to say after printing first table, second table print should start at new page.
I have a fairly large report with multiple matrix tables. They grow to a fixed width horizontally and may grow to various heights vertically. I have the interactive height set to zero so that it displays on the web page on one screen. When I go to print this report, I am getting a blank page between each page with data. Here are my dimensions:
Report:
height: 15 in
width: 8.5 in
interactive height: 0 in
interactive width: 8.5 in
left margin: .5 in
right margin: .5 in
top margin: .5 in
bottom margin: .5 in
Body:
height: 13.3875 in
width: 6.9 in
Would this problem be due to the fact that my matrix tables span an area greater than a normal page height in design mode even before they grow dynamically? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
I have many tables, and I just want to print the relationships between them. Â The ones without foreign keys to primary key relations are irrelevant. Â I made a diagram of all tables in sql server management studio, and it shows the key relations, but its a very large diagram horizontally and vertically. Â Is there a way to print the whole thing so that it doesn't take endless pages that I don't know how to piece together?
A newbie question. I am tearing my hair out trying to work out how in Sql Server 2005 to get a printout (or even better a file I can save that i could incroporate in a wrod document), or both, which shows the structure of all the tables in my database.
I want to list all tables (or selected tables perhaps) , and all columns in those tables, with the attributes of each column (nvarchar(2) etc or decimal(18,5) etc). Just a simple listing of all tables and their columns and the attributes of those columns.
Surely this must be possible with a simple one click operation in Sql Server 2005. I have created a database diagram which gives me part of what I want, but that just shows the tables, relationships, and column names, not the attributes of each column which is what I need as well.
I don't want to have to start installing third party products to do this, and I have no great script writing capabilities. Surely such a basic function is easily acheivable with one or two clicks in Sql Server 2005 from a menu somewhere in sql server mangaement studio?
I'we set up a replication between to sql 2000 servers(transactional replication), the problem is that user application is using select @@identity. I can se way this is a problem, but i cannot find an solution to this. Other than change the client app's code, which undesirable. Anyone with an suggestion how to solve this issue?
1. Can someone tell me how to replicate the identity field. 2. When I use the 'NOT FOR REPLICATION' option, I keeps getting synx error. Here is the command: alter table tusers alter column {userid INT} IDENTITY (1, 1) [NOT FOR REPLICATION]. Do you know why? 3. When I use the transaction replication wizard, why some of the table do not allow me to replicate(There is a key and cross symbol on the articles selection)?
I have a production database with about half the tables using IDENTITY columns for PRIMARY KEYS. This system is configured as both a Publisher and a Distributor. We are using Transactional Replication without updates. The SQL Server Agent runs every hour to pick up any changes and replicate them to the Subscriber (another SQL Server machine configured as our failover server).
Both servers are running SQL Server 7.0 (original, no service packs) under Windows NT 4.0 (SP4).
The failover server (the replication Subscriber) will only be used if the primary server goes down. And hopefully, only for a short time before the primary server comes back online. During the time that the failover is actually being used, the application will not make any changes to the database.
The IDENTITY values that are replicated need to stay with their original values. The replication process CANNOT assign new values to these columns when there are inserted into the database on the Publisher (i.e. failover server)
My question is: According to the documention, I can add 'NOT FOR REPLICATION' to the IDENTITY columns and the values will be preserved. But a collegue of mine says that resets the IDENTITY sequence on the subscriber and the 2nd time a row gets inserted on the Publisher, the values get messed up. On his system, he calls a stored procedure for the tables with IDENTITY columns, and in the stored procedure, he executes a 'SET IDENTITY_INSERT OFF', then INSERTS the row, then 'SET IDENTITY_INSERT ON'. He claims that this approach solved his issues with IDENTITY columns.
Who is right? Do I have to create a stored procedure for replication for every table with an IDENTITY column, or can I just add 'NOT FOR REPLICATION' and SQL Server will handle the rest?
NOTE: Upgrading to SQL Server 2000 is NOT an option right now. Although, if a Service Pack for 7 fixes this, that might be an option.
Thanks in advance for any help you can shed on this issue.
We are trying to run replication from one server to another. Most of the tables in the publishing database have identity columns set. At one point the subscribing database had a match of identity columns and primary keys matching the publishing database. Obviously with a primary key set on the subscriber there would be conflicts with duplicate key inserts. We disabled the identity columms and droped the indexes and the data was able to replicate over. However, we discovered that the identity columns, which are used to generate id's on many of our tables, were not replicating over to the subscriber. In fact a null value was being inserted into the subsriber database.
Anyone seen this before? What, if there is one, is the solution?
How does an identity is affected by merge replication? Can sql control it so that there will be no replication conflict?
Here's the scenario, I have several tables with an identity column. the database resides in a server in the head office, there are several remote sites and remote users which will be running sql 7 desktop edition. Each remote will download only the data subset he is allowed to. Each site will be allowed add new rows on several table. Then they will update the head office server through replication.
hi there. I was wondering is there any way that you can use an Identity Column on both a subcribing and Publishing table in Replication, I am receiving errors when I run Replication with Identity Columns, Thanks in advance Fin
Issue: I am having an issue with my audit table, This table is filled by Triggers on various tables through the database. All triggers are defied with "not for replication"
I have allocated 500k ranges, with 80% threshold to the publisher and subscriber databases for this table. The table only holds 225,000 records.
From time to time I get the following error "The identity range managed by replication is full and must be updated by a replication agent. The INSERT conflict occurred in database 'PublicationName', table 'AuditHistory', column 'AuditID'. Sp_adjustpublisheridentityrange can be called to get a new identity range."
When I looked into the issue yesterday I noticed that the identity range being used by replication was 334300001 -> 334799999, however the maximum value in the table was 334300096, meaning that only 95 records were inserted, which means it is no where near the 80% threshold.
Somehow the identity seed on the AuditHistory table had been changed to 334800104, which is outside the allowable range.
My question is what could cause the identity seed to get set to such a high number??
I have a database table with a simple identity column. As a starting point... when I run the following queries... this is what I get:
SELECT Max(AliasID) FROM Account_Managers 1300006
DBCC CHECKIDENT ('Account_Managers') Checking identity information: current identity value '1300006', current column value '1300006'.
Now... I set up merge replication, with the plan of allowing SQL Server to manage my identity ranges for me. I set up my ranges to be 100000 on the publication, 100000 on the subscriber, with a threshold of 80.
I would EXPECT to see the constraint ([AliasID]>(1300006) AND [AliasID]<=(1400006)) on the publisher and ([AliasID]>(1400006) AND [AliasID]<=(1500006)) on the subscriber.
However... what I do get is:
([AliasID]>(1300006) AND [AliasID]<=(1400006) OR [AliasID]>(1400006) AND [AliasID]<=(1500006)) on the publisher and
([AliasID]>(1500006) AND [AliasID]<=(1600006) OR [AliasID]>(1600006) AND [AliasID]<=(1700006))
Can anyone tell me why I get the OR... which essentially makes my identity ranges twice as large as they should be?
Hi, I am trying to replicate our application database (SQL server 2005) using transactional replication to another server. What I did was, took a backup of the live database and restored in backup server with same name. Then did a transactional replication. Issue is we have few tables having Identity columns defined as primary keys and 'Not for Replication' option of these tables is 'NO'. But once published, this becomes 'Yes' and also replication failed showing an error as
Explicit value must be specified for identity column in table <table name> either when IDENTITY_INSERT is set to ON or when a replication user is inserting into a NOT FOR REPLICATION identity column.
In the table article, for the parameter 'Action If name is in use', I have selected 'Drop the existing object and create a new one' (Also tried another option 'Delete Data'). How to resolve these issues.
I'm having a central Server with SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition and Other sites with Sql Express Server 2005.
Other sites will also be adding New records and data will be replicated to Central server and from there it will be distributed to all sites.
Question is that if Other sites are also adding Records how i can assing Identity values in those databases. There are few restricitons on this :-
1. I don't want to use GUID.
2. Numbers should be sequential that is after 1000, 1001, 1002 etc. should come.
i thought of adding Negative Values in the primary key on other sites and then when data is replicated on central server then replace it with sequential key but i'm not clear on how to accomplish this.
We are running merge replication. My identity value was out of sync and the inserts stopped working. I Reseeded the identity value to 1500000 and ran "sp_adjustpublisheridentity" which set that to the new range (and table constraint)Â in the MSMerge file and table. I discovered my error and Reseeded the table back to 150000. How to I get the new range to be created when it is LESS than 1500000 in the MsMerge file???? Can I use the sp_restoreidentity....???
We have an application that use merge replication between MSDE and Devices with SQL CE.
Due to a major application changes, we have to change our replication on all our workstation. Our process is the following:
- drop current replication
- recreate our replication
After first check our replication seems to work but after some test we have identify that all identity ranges have been reset on the workstation. As side effect, device start to reuse existing range and also existing value in the range.
We are having problems printing Reports (when printing by clicking on the AcitiveX print control), where the font for the fields are set to "C39HrP24DhTt" (barcode).
While viewing the report it displays as Barcodes but while printing, the Barcode does not get printed, but the string gets printed.
Environment: SSRS 2005
Using the ReportViewer Control in a .Net 2.0 Web App to render the reports.
BarCodes print fine in the following situations:
1. When the Report is exported to Excel and when printed from there
2. When you click on the print button on Internet Explorer
3. When saving as html (from view source) and opening that html document and printing.
BarCodes do NOT get printed in the following situation:
1. When printing by clicking on the "Print" (Active X Control) icon. Even the "Print Preview" does not show the Barcode.
I have a table, which is being replicated with the identity column set "not for replication" and a stored procedure, which is also replicated (execution) which inserts into this table. When the execution of the stored procedure happens, the replication monitor complains about identity value not being provided.other than removing the stored procedure from replication?
"Adding an identity column to a published table is not supported, because it can result in non-convergence when the column is replicated to the Subscriber. The values in the identity column at the Publisher depend on the order in which the rows for the affected table are physically stored. The rows might be stored differently at the Subscriber; therefore the value for the identity column can be different for the same rows."
I don't understand...
If I create a table with an identity column and publish it. Can the values on the subscriber be different when the data is replicated?
Suppose I have a this table:
1 Name1 2 Name2 3 Name3
Column 1 is identity field and column 2 the name of employees.
If I publish this table , the data can be inserted on the subscriber .pe, with 2 name1 and 1 name3 and 1 name2?
What about if the identify fields is a primary key?
Hi all i have setup merge replication with one publisher and 3 subscribers
The replication worked fine for about 2 months then i recieved the following error on all my subscriptions
The Publisher failed to allocate a new set of identity ranges for the subscription. This can occur when a Publisher or a republishing Subscriber has run out of identity ranges to allocate to its own Subscribers or when an identity column data type does not support an additional identity range allocation. If a republishing Subscriber has run out of identity ranges, synchronize the republishing Subscriber to obtain more identity ranges before restarting the synchronization. If a Publisher runs out of identit (Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error number: MSSQL_REPL-2147199417) Get help: http://help/MSSQL_REPL-2147199417
I have updated my sql server to service pack 2
The publisher is sql Standard edition and the subscribers are Express edition
We have implemented replication on SQL Server 2005 with 1 publisher and 1 snapshot (non-update) subscriber.
The purpose is for emergency disaster fail-over.
If the publisher (Primary) fails, then we switch the DNS so the subscriber (Secondary) becomes ‘live’ and we need it to be able to accept new records.
The problem is that the identity seeds start at 0 on the Secondary server - so no records can be input, as there are primary key violations.
We can set the increment value to -1 for all the seeds, and this works.
However there are config & replication issues with bringing up the database on the failed (Primary) server once it is restored and back online.
Does it really need to be this complicated?
Where are the ‘next identity seeds’ for all the tables in the database stored? Can they be restored on the database when fail-over occurs?
Or is there some setting in the Microsoft SQL Dba?