I am replicating an 80GB database between NY can CT and would like to
know why table sizes are different between the two.
Here is an example of sp_spaceused::
NY IOI_2007_04_23 rows(279,664) reserved(464,832)
data(439,960) index_size(24,624)
CT IOI_2007_04_23 rows(279,666) reserved(542,232)
data(493,232) index_size(48,784)
Thanks,
We have written an application which splits up our customers data intotheir individual databases. The structure of the databases is thesame. Is it better to create the same stored procedures in eachdatabase or have them in one central location and use the sp_executesqland execute the generated the SQL statement.Thank you.Mayur Patel
View 4 Replies View RelatedClient is running X- version of application and corresponding database size is huge. Now client's vendor is releasing Y-version of same application with many database schema changes (like new tables added, new columns added, renamed existing columns and etc) To upgrade to the Y-version, vendor is suggesting to my client that down the system and do the upgrade for application/database to Y-version. We are sure that this process will take days together to upgrade to the Y-version. My client is not ready to down the system for that long. So we are trying to find the solution with minimal down time.The approach we are thinking is,
1) Create the replicated database to another server (server2) from production server(server1) using golden gate with X-version
2) Create new tables/schema updated tables from Y-version database on same server1. Here for Updated schema tables we are planning to use the name <table_name_Y_version> as the same table name exists in X-version.
3)With above 2 steps, golden gate replicate the changes from production to server1 and server1 will have the new Y-version table schema (with different concatenate name ' _Y_version'). BTW , there is no affect for the production
4) At this stage we are planning to find best approach, to fill the '<table_name>_Y_version' from X-version tables. two challenges here a) all data needs to be moved to Y-version tables b) they have to sync data in real time.
we thought of going to
a) ssis package to pump the data to Y-version tables, but real time data will not sync.
b) trigger based technique, previous experience said, lot of load
c) thinking about sql replication.
Hi,
Can somebody tell how to make an estimation of the size needed when creating a 'consult' DB with snapshot replication ?
Thanks !
I have a database with three different tables having the exact same fields. New records are written to table1, before moving to table2 and ultimately table3. I was wondering if it's possible to run the same query on all three tables at the same time. I need to get all unique instances in the JC field from each table after a specified date. I get an "Ambiguous column name" error on the JC and TimeID fields.
SELECT distinct [JC]
FROM [table1], [table2], [table3]
where timeid > '20090900';
Hi,
I have two tables named Tab1 and Tab2. Both are identical in structure. The only diff is Tab2 has two more additional fields (FromDate and ToDate).
The structure is like below :
Col1
Col2 (Date field)
Col3
Col4
Also Tab 2 have
Col5 (From Date)
Col6 (To Date)
Now I want to transfer some set of reocrds from Tab1 to Tab2. The additional Tab2 field (Col5 and Col6) values should be the minimum and maximum values of Tab1 date field for the current set.
How to accomplish this? Kindly help me in this regard.
Thanks
Somu
Does anyone have a good query that would return records from two tables that are found in one, but not it the other table? In my situation I have 2 tables that are duplicate tables and I need to find an additional 3000 records that were added to one of the tables. I also have a composite key so the query would have col1, col2 and col3 as the composite key. So far I have tried concatenating the 3 columns and giving the result an alias and then trying to show the ones that were not in both tables, but have been struggling. Thanks..
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have two different tables... one for all Staff, and another for all Temp Staff. I need both to output to a datagrid, and so I need to grab both tables from a SQL query to output to my datagrid, but I can't seem to get the logic right for it to work. Can someone give me some suggestions on why my results are blank when I'm running this query? I thought a simple join would allow both sets of identical column names to coexist in peace...SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT dbo.StaffDirectory.UserName, dbo.StaffDirectory.LastName, dbo.StaffDirectory.FirstName, dbo.StaffDirectory.Dept, dbo.StaffDirectory.Title, dbo.StaffDirectory.EMail, dbo.StaffDirectory.LocationFROM dbo.StaffDirectory INNER JOIN dbo.TempStaff ON dbo.StaffDirectory.Location = dbo.TempStaff.Location AND dbo.StaffDirectory.EMail = dbo.TempStaff.Email AND dbo.StaffDirectory.Title = dbo.TempStaff.Title AND dbo.StaffDirectory.Dept = dbo.TempStaff.Dept AND dbo.StaffDirectory.FirstName = dbo.TempStaff.FName AND dbo.StaffDirectory.LastName = dbo.TempStaff.LName AND dbo.StaffDirectory.UserName = dbo.TempStaff.UName AND dbo.StaffDirectory.MDNo = dbo.TempStaff.MDNoIs something wrong here? It just doesn't work =(Any suggestions would be really appreciated.Thank you
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi all,
I have two tables A and B on two both tables have similar architectures bout contain some deferent records.
I like to compare them and find and view the differences in records.
Thanks for any help.
Abrahim
Selecting the data from these two tables? The columns 'host_ext_id' have the same data BUT in 'adrmst' all data is preceeded by A0000.
table is 'adrmst'
Host External IDAddress NameAddress Line 1Address Line 2City StatePostal Code
A000042401 T-3803VC 1530401 00 WENGER STTOPEKA KS66609
A000042402 CO INC 960 PP TOMLIN MILL RDSTATESVILLENC286258332
A000042403 CO INC 1420 PP BLVD GARYSBURGNC278319748
A000042405 CO INC 1419 PP BROWN RD KISSIMMEEFL347463415
A000042405 CO INC 962 PP COMMERCE DRVALDOSTAGA316011206
table is 'shipment'
Shipment IDHost External IDcar_move_idP_DEST_LOC_ID
42401 42401
42402 42402 SDQD_00862TAGSDQD
42403 42403 SDQD_00863TAGSDQD
42404 42404 SDQD_00863TAGSDQD
42405 42405 SDQD_00863TAGSDQD
I'd like to extend a package functionality.
I created it drag/drop way with hard-coded table names.
Now for the same source and destination connections I'd like somehow in a loop transform 20 source tables of the same structure to 20 destination tables of the same structure providing table names in a loop.
I also have in the package preparation SQL tasks such as dropping destination table if exists, and then re-creation , so it needs to consume a table name as parameter from my loop.
Is it doable ?
Im wondering if it is possible to write a procedure that check two identical tables for any missing records. The table design is excatly the same, but some records (of the 40,000) have not copied over to the second table.
Any help would be great, cheers.
The following procedure will display the size of all the user tables in a database.
CREATE proc sp_tablesize
as
if exists (select * from sysobjects where name = 'sp_tablesize')
begin
goto calculate_tablesize
end
else
begin
CREATE TABLE #SpaceUsed
(
TableName sysname,
TableRows int,
TableSize varchar(10),
DataSpaceUsed varchar(10),
IndexSpaceUsed varchar(10),
UnusedSpace varchar(10)
)
goto calculate_tablesize
end
calculate_tablesize:
declare @tablename nvarchar(50)
declare @cmd nvarchar(50)
declare c1 cursor for select name from sysobjects where xtype='u'
open c1
fetch c1 into @tablename
while @@fetch_status = 0
begin
set @cmd='exec sp_spaceused['+@tablename+']'
insert into #SpaceUsed exec sp_executesql @cmd
fetch next from c1 into @tablename
end
select * from #SpaceUsed
drop table #SpaceUsed
deallocate c1
Hi
I am trying to check the size of each table in my database?
SELECT <TableName> , 'Size in bytes/megabytes' FROM DATABASE
I can't for the lif of me figure out how this is done.
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Kind Regards
Carel Greaves
I'm trying import 7 tables from each of 30 SQL2005 databases into a SQL2005 Consolidation database. I can simply create data flow tasks for each one but instead I would like loop through a list instead.
I've created a table to house the names of the databases from which I want to import the data.
I've created SQL task to return the database names from the table as a "Full Result Set".
I've assigned the result set to a user variable (type = Object) an named the result name 0
What I'd like to do is create a data flow task which connects to each of the databases and imports 7 specified tables from each database appending the table name with my database name in the result set.
I'm stuck on how I'd set the connection strings in my OLE DB Source in my Data Flow task. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Bill Webster
I have 57 tables, 7 views and 1 stored procedure. Just wanted know based on these requirements how can I find the size of the database. Though the DB contains lots of tables, views and procedures. I am moving these details to new DB server. So I need to put right requirements.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a Db that is 1.7 gigs. The table data takes approximately 200megs. The transaction logs were truncated. Where else can this large size be coming from and how can I confirm?
DB is generally small. ~25 tables, 100 SPs, 10 views, etc.
Note:
I have 4 queues using SQL Notifications, but when selecting from them results in no data.
Thanks
Scott
I need to build a query to calculate the size of all tables in a database ...
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi,
I have a number of "join" tables ie joins records from two other tables for example, an employee may be responsible for more than one product so the join table would look like this:
table name: employee_products
Employee_id foreign key from employee table
product_id goreign key from products table
My question is, how do I replication this table? Replication requires all table to have a primary key field. In this case, both fields are foreign keys and I dont have a primary key as the same data appears regularly in either field.
How should I get around this so I can implement replication? I dont want to have to add another field to be the primary key field.
Thanks
I have a table that is used for reporting, the problem is that the data in the table is refreshed every 30 minutes with a bulk insert. I am trying to find a way to have two tables that are mirror images of each other and when the loading table is loaded, then the table assumes the identity of the reporting table. The basic prinicpal is I need to have the table be available almost all the time and when the bulk insert is happening, users cannot query. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Marc Brown
I can't seem to find the answer to this in the documentation.
I have several tables that I want to replicate via transactional replication. These tables do have some foreign keys between them.
What are the advantages/disadvantages of "one table per publication" versus "one publication with all of these tables listed as articles"?
If I do not define these in the same publication, will I get into trouble with the order that data is loaded to satisfy the foreign key constraints?
Sorry if this is a super-basic question...I'm used to join selects but not sure how to approach an append select (or something like it)
I have two tables with identical field structures: a Master table with 10,000 rows and a Custom table table with 1,000 rows
To keep it simple, let's say the two tables each have a FirstName field and a LastName Field.
Is it possible to use a View or a Select statement (or any other method) to 'append' the rows of both tables so that the result set still has only the two columns (FirstName and LastName) and has 11,000 rows?
Thanks for your help!
Randy
CREATE TABLE [RS_A] ([ColA] [varchar] (10)[ColB] [int] NULL)CREATE TABLE [RS_B] ([ColA] [varchar] (10)[ColB] [int] NULL)INSERT INTO RS_AVALUES ('hemingway' , 1)INSERT INTO RS_AVALUES ('vidal' , 2)INSERT INTO RS_AVALUES ('dickens' , 3)INSERT INTO RS_AVALUES ('rushdie' , 4)INSERT INTO RS_BVALUES ('hemingway' , 1)INSERT INTO RS_BVALUES ('vidal' , 2)I need to find all the rows in A which do not exist in Bby matching on both ColA and ColBso the output should bedickens 3rushdie 4So if i write a query like this , I dont get the right result setSELECT A.ColA, A.ColBFROMRS_A AINNERJOIN RS_B BONA.ColA <B.ColAORB.ColB <B.ColBBut if i do the following, i do get the right result, but followingseems convoluted.SELECT A.ColA, A.ColBFROMRS_A AWHERE ColA + CAST(ColB AS VARCHAR)NOT IN (SELECT ColA+CAST(ColB AS VARCHAR) FROMRS_B B)
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have seen a bunch of ways to get the size of all the tables within a database posted on this board. I decided to modify an older one I found here (http://www.sqlteam.com/item.asp?ItemID=282). I set it up so there is no cursors or temp tables. Pretty much just one select statement to return all the info you would need. It seems to be faster than anything I have seen so far. Take it for whats its worth. Thanks to the original creator.
/*
Original by: Bill Graziano (SQLTeam.com)
Modified by: Eric Stephani (www.mio.uwosh.edu/stephe40)
*/
declare @low int
select @low = low from
master.dbo.spt_values
where number = 1 and type = 'E'
select o.id, o.name, ro.rowcnt, (r.reserved * @low)/1024 as reserved,
(d.data * @low)/1024 as data, ((i.used-d.data) * @low)/1024 as indexp,
((r.reserved-d.data-(i.used-d.data)) * @low)/1024 as unused
from
sysobjects o
inner join
(select distinct id, rowcnt
from sysindexes
where keys is not null and first != 0) ro on o.id = ro.id
inner join
(select id, sum(reserved) reserved
from sysindexes
where indid in (0, 1, 255)
group by id) r on o.id = r.id
inner join
(select c.id, dpages+isnull(used, 0) data from
(select id, sum(dpages) dpages
from sysindexes
where indid < 2
group by id) c full outer join
(select id, isnull(sum(used), 0) used
from sysindexes
where indid = 255
group by id) t on c.id = t.id) d on r.id = d.id
inner join
(select id, sum(used) used
from sysindexes
where indid in (0, 1, 255)
group by id) i on d.id = i.id
where o.xtype = 'U'
order by reserved desc
Hello All,
When creating my database I have modeled some of the tables after the Adventureworks sample database.
There are some fields or entire tables in Adventureworks that I do not see an imediate use for, however; I would hate to ommit them to find out later they would have been benificial. (.eg territory table).
In general terms what would the impact be on size and performance of a database which contains tables or fields that do not contain data.
Thanks for your help!
I have a database consisting of two main tables and 12 sub tables.
This was leading to increase in database size. So we thought of storing the sub tables data in the main tables in form of xml in a column of varchar(2000) type.
So we created a new database that only had 2 tables and we stored the data of the sub tables in the new column of the main table.
Surprisingly we saw that the database size increased rather than decreasing .
Hi,
Please let me know if it is possible to replicate a table with identity property defined in it. Both the publisher and subscriber tables have identity property defined. Which option should be used while setting up transactional replication to allow the identity values at the publisher pushed to the subscriber, which also has identity property defined? Not for replication option with the identity property also fails. Whichever option I choose I get the error, 'An explicit value for the identity column in table 'jobs_id_nfr' can only be specified when a column list is used and IDENTITY_INSERT is ON.' This works only if the identity property is not defined at the subscriber. But, I need to have the identity property defined at the subscriber also because the subscriber should be an exact copy of production.
Thanks in advance,
Praveena
hi,
is it possible to replicate data from one table to another which have different names,different schemas and different column names.
Im trying this using transactional replication.
i achieved this for different schema, different table names.but it is failing for different column names.
till now i haven't got a proper reply for my problem.
regards
Baji Prasad.B
I found it pretty interesting. I checked the size of a database, before implementing database compression across all the user tables in a database. And Post implementation of compression too I checked the size of the database.
I did not find any difference. But if I expand the table and check propetires->storage and I can see that PAGE compression is implemented across all the tables, but no compaction in the size of the db. It still remains the same.
How does database connection pooling work for multiple "copies" of the same web application on the same server? My IIS 5 win2K server has 32 sites, all pointed to the same code. Each site responds to a different IP/URL(www.a.com, www.b.com, etc.) for SSL reasons. DB is SQL 2000.
Based on perf stats, as a new site spins up, a new pool is created. So when I hit site 1, I see 10 pooled connections. Site 2 bumps it up to 20, etc. However, I don't see it go up to 320, so it isn't linear.
BTW, I'm trying to build a case for having 1 site/application that all URL's point to in order to conserve memory, connection pooling, caching, etc.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
-Allen
Here's some code that says it should identify if a user already exists in my database. I have changed the code to match my database, but it seems to have somewhat the opposite affect, rejecting all names (even new ones) or accepting all names (including existing ones). The switch in situations occurs in the "if" statement towardsd the end, when I change the sign of objDR.RecordsAffected. Do you have any idea what could be wrong? Thanks.
Function DoesUserExist(ByVal userName As String) As Boolean
Dim connectionString As String = "server='(local)Netsdk'; trusted_connection=true; Database='AuthorizedUsers'"
Dim sqlConnection As System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection = New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection(connectionString)
Dim queryString As String = "SELECT [Users].[UserName] FROM [Users] WHERE ([Users].[UserName] = @UserName)"
Dim sqlCommand As System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand = New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand(queryString, sqlConnection)
Dim Cmd as New SQLCommand(queryString, sqlConnection)
With Cmd.Parameters
.Add(New SQLParameter("@username", username))
End With
sqlConnection.Open
Dim blHasRows As Boolean
Dim objDR As System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader = Cmd.ExecuteReader(system.data.CommandBehavior.CloseConnection)
if objDR.RecordsAffected > 0 then
blHasRows="True"
else
blHasRows="False"
End If
Return blHasRows
End Function
When replicating a table which has an identity column I get the error: "Procedure cp_insert_tblname expects parameter @C1, which was not supplied.". The stored procedure appears to be called without any parameters so my insert stored procedure does not work. I know I'm missing something basic here!! Do I have to add the field names when telling replication to use a custom stored procedure. If not, how do arguments get passed to my SP, as globals somehow?
Any info greatly appreciated!!
Thanks,
Jay
when i do a snapshot i have it set up to truncate before inserting. As a result I'm getting an error saying that it cant truncate a table reference in an indexed view. What settings should i use to allow for a snapshot in this instance? Should i manually drop the databinding then snap then recreate the databinding? there has to be a better way
View 1 Replies View Related