Hi ,
I need to place the results of two different queries in the same result
table parallel to each other.
So if the result of the first query is
1 12
2 34
3 45
and the second query is
1 34
2 44
3 98
the results should be displayed as
1 12 34
2 34 44
3 45 98
If a union is done for both the queries , we get the results in rows.
How can the above be done.
Thanks in advance,
vivekian
I have a table with 8 columns, I need to update data in multiple columns on this table, this table contains 1 million records, having single update was taking time so I broke the single update into multiple update statements and running multiple update statements in parallel, Each update statement updates different column.
This approach is working fine but I am getting the deadlock error.
Transaction (Process ID 65) was deadlocked on lock | communication buffer resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.
I tried with various lock hints but no success.
Why I am seeing double ups in the 'Bin Label' and 'Bin Qty' columns.
My query looks like the following -
Code:
go
declare @whCode varchar(5), @binLoc varchar(2)
set @whCode = '04'
if @whCode = ''
set @whCode = '%'
if @whCode = '02'
set @binLoc = 'S%'
[code]....
why my results are doubling up in the two indicated columns.
I have a query (SELECT * FROM Pricing) that produces the following results
Stockcode|ProductID|OurSellPrice|SupplierTypeID|CompetitorPrice
SC0001___|123______|22.45_______|1_____________|25.23
SC0001___|123______|21.45_______|2_____________|25.23
I want to convert this to the following :
Stockcode|ProductID|OurSellPriceType1|OurSellPriceType2|CompetitorPrice
SC001____|123______|22.45____________|21.45____________|25.23
We only have two types of suppliers but not every product is available from each type of supplier so we might get the following results:
Stockcode|ProductID|OurSellPrice|SupplierTypeID|CompetitorPrice
SC0002___|124______|22.45_______|1_____________|25.23
Stockcode|ProductID|OurSellPriceType1|OurSellPriceType2|CompetitorPrice
SC001____|123______|22.45____________|NULL_____________|25.23
Hi,
I have following data coming from prior transformations.
Id Unit Name NewFlag
___ __________ ____________
1 JacuzziBox 1
2 Hummer H2 0
3 Waste dumper 0
and so on.
I want aggregate task to result 2 fields (without any GROUP BY-ing), so that one contains total number of rows or records, and one contain total number of records with NewFlag=1.
Just wondering if it is possible by using Aggregate and how.
Thanks for your help in advance,
I have a DBTable named Vendors which includes the following columns: CompanyName (Name Here)
SBI (Yes, No)
MBE (Yes, No)
SBI (Yes, No)
WBE (Yes, No)
I'm trying to do a search on Vendors where either SBI or MBE or SBI or WBE is equal to 'yes' and then order by company name.
I'm lost on both the search and the results code.
I'd like to have a drop down for the search like this:
<form name="Search" action="vendor_results.asp" method="post">
<Input type=hidden name="validate" value=1>
Show all Vendors who are: <Select name="?????">
<OPTION value="YES">SBI
<OPTION value="YES">SBE
<OPTION value="Yes">MBE
<OPTION value="Yes">WBE
</select>
<Input type="submit" Value="Go">
</form>
Any ideas on how to make this work would be greatly appreciated.
I have to write a query which extracts everyone from a table who has the same surname and forenames as someone else but different id's.
The query should have a surname column, a forenames column, and two id columns (from the person column of the table).
I need to avoid duplicates i.e. the first table id should only be returned in the first id column and not in the second - which is what i am getting at the mo.
This is what i have done
select first.surname, first.forenames, first.person, second.person
from shared.people first, shared.people second
where first.surname= second.surname
and first.forenames = second.forenames
and not first.person = second.person
order by first.surname, first.forenames
and i get results like this
Porter Sarah Victoria 9518823 9869770
Porter Sarah Victoria 9869770 9518823 - i.e. duplicates
cheers
I have written some SQL that relates to the (partial) result set below -
I am having an incredibly difficult time trying to work out why I am seeing double ups in the 'Bin Label' and 'Bin Qty' columns.
My query looks like the following -
go
declare @whCode varchar(5), @binLoc varchar(2)
set @whCode = '04'
if @whCode = ''
set @whCode = '%'
[Code].....
I have a table called approval_levels in which I have 2 columns:
|LEVEL_ID |NAME |
|1 |app_level_1 |
|2 |app_level_2 |
|3 |app_level_3 |
I have a second table called requests, in which I have 3 columns:
|REQUEST_ID |PRODUCT_NAME |MANUFACTURER |
|1 |wd-40 |Acme |
|2 |Windex |Acme |
|3 |Propane |Acme |
I have a third table which links the two called request_approvals which has 2 columns: REQUEST_ID, LEVEL_ID. When a request is approved for a specific level, I insert a value into this table. So, for example, lets say request 1 has been approved for all 3 levels, request 2 has been approved for only level 1, and request 3 has been approved for level 3, the table would show something like this.
|REQUEST_ID |LEVEL_ID |
|1 |1 |
|1 |2 |
|1 |3 |
|2 |1 |
|3 |3 |
Ok, so here the challenge: I need to show in a report all the requests, create a columns for each level and show whether or not that request is approved for that level. The end result has to be something like this:
|REQUEST_ID |PRODUCT_NAME |MANUFACTURER |app_level_1 |app_level_2 |app_level_3 |
|1 |wd-40 |Acme |X |X |X |
|2 |Windex |Acme |X | | |
|3 |Propane |Acme | | |X |
Keep in mind that if another value is added to the approval_levels table (ie app_level_4), I need to add another column to the table call app_level_4 dynamically.Now, how in the world do I do something like this?
I have 2 columns from 2 separate tables.
Col1 is AccountName from tblOpportunities
Col2 is BillToName from AccountCodes
I am trying to get the results from tblOpportunities.AccountName that DO NOT also exist in AccountCodes.BillToName
Thanks
I'm writing a FTS query which needs to search on two different columns.
E.g. Table contains "Location" and "LocationDescription" columns.
Both columns are FT indexed.
The query also uses AND/OR operators to filter out the results.
I found the following article which gives the solution to the same problem.
Link: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;286787
Is this problem associated with SQL Server 2005 also?
Making a third column which hold data from first two column is the
only solution or is there any other way to acheive better results?
Shailesh Patel...
We have the below query that pulls benefit ids for employees but it will show each benefit on a separate row but we would like to have just one rows for the employee and columns for each of the benefits.
SELECT
hcd.PersonId,
hcd.PlanYear,
hcd.TaxIdNumber,
hcd.LastName,
hcd.FirstName,
hcd.BirthDate,
[code]....
I am trying to take the results of a query and re-orient them into separate columns.
select distinct
W_SUMMARYDETAILS.FACILITY_ID,
W_SUMMARYDETAILS.REPORTING_YEAR, (2011 - 2014, I want these years broken out into columns for each year)
W_SUMMARYDETAILS.FACILITY_NAME,
W_DEF_SUMMARYDETAILS.REPORTING_PERIOD (2011 - 2013, I want these years broken out into columns for each year)
From W_SUMMARYDETAILS
full outer join W_DEF_SUMMARYDETAILS
on W_SUMMARYDETAILS.FACILITY_ID=W_DEF_SUMMARYDETAILS.FACILITY_ID and
W_SUMMARYDETAILS.REPORTING_YEAR=W_DEF_SUMMARYDETAILS.REPORTING_PERIOD
As of now the query puts all the years into a single column -- one for DEF_SUMMARY and another for SUMMARY.
I am looking to create 7 additional columns for all the individual years in the results instead of just two columns.
I have a query which returns the movements to and from our warehouse stock, as well as the current stock for each depot and how much is on order. What I need is a kind of pivot so that each item is shown just once, and then summarises the movements in 4 extra columns: Last 30 days, 30-60 days, 60-90 days and 90-120 days. How can I achieve this with my query below? A sample of some of the results is also shown.
select
iv.item,
iv.descr,
ts.loc_total_on_hand [Stock],
ts.loc_code [Depot],
po.qty [On Order],
po.office [Order Depot],
[Code] .....
Dear all,
I have a sub report that returns a variable amount of results. On occasion many results will be returned and cause one or more extra pages to be created.
The results from my sub report are not very wide so what I would like to do is have the results roll over from the left hand side of the page to the right hand side of the page and then continue this pattern on sunsequest pages until all results are displayed. Very similar to newspaper columns.
Is this possibe? If so how can I go about doing this?
Many thanks in advance,
Trevor Keast.
Hi,I am using MS SQL server 2005 and wondering how to sort my results by rank using FREETEXT on multiple columns. Is there a way to do this? My two colums are:title and description
can anyone give any code snippets?
I am imagining something you might pass the names of 2 stored procs (an old version and new one), and a query to produce valid parameters. It would then fire off each proc for a set number of executions, while storing off the results in temp tables, and at the end it would do a data compare, and store off performance data from dynamic management views.
Now I know how to get the parameters for a stored procedure out of the catalogue views, but is SQL Server aware at all of the schema of the results of stored procedures that return result sets, becuase I was thinking of doing something like...
INSERT INTO #datacompare(col1,col2)
EXEC mystoredprocedure
... but I can not seem to figure out how to dynamically gather the schema of the result set.
I have a view I've created which displays client sortname, partner and date added which displays 7 results.
When I add another table to this view to display the Industry it then only gives me 4 results as the other 3 results have no Industry instead of giving me the 7 results and showing the Industry column as empty for the other 3.
Is there a way I can make it show all 7 results and havethe column where the industry is empty display the other results instead of not displaying any results at all for them?
Script:
SELECT dbo.cdbClient.cltSortName AS ClientName, dbo.vcltAttrib4.ainTVal AS ClientPartner, dbo.vcltAttrib422.ainDVal AS [Date Added],
dbo.cdbAttribInst.ainTVal AS Inudstry
FROM dbo.cdbClient LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.cdbObject ON dbo.cdbClient.cltCategoryID = dbo.cdbObject.objID LEFT OUTER JOIN
[Code] ....
In the above script the cbdAttribInst table has the Industry column I need which is 'ainTVal'...
Hi everyone. I am updating a table with aggregate results for multiplecolumns. Below is an example of how I approached this. It works finebut is pretty slow. Anyone have an idea how to increase performance.Thanks for any help.UPDATE #MyTableSET HireDate=(Select Min(Case When Code = 'OHDATE' then DateChangedelse null end)From HREHWhere #MyTable.HRCo=HREH.HRCo and#MyTable.HRRef=HREH.HRRef ),TerminationDate=(select Max(Case When Type = 'N' thenDateChanged else null end)From HREHWhere #MyTable.HRCo=HREH.HRCo and#MyTable.HRRef=HREH.HRRef ),ReHireDate=(select MAX(Case When Code = 'HIRE' thenDateChanged else null end)From HREHWhere #MyTable.HRCo=HREH.HRCo and #MyTable.HRRef=HREH.HRRef )
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have two queries as below;
SELECT EventID, Role, EventDuty, Qty, StartTime, EndTime, Hours
FROM dbo.tblEventStaffRequired;
and
SELECT EventID, Role, StartTime, EndTime, Hours, COUNT(ID) AS Booked
FROM tblStaffBookings
GROUP BY EventID, Role, StartTime, EndTime, Hours;
How can I join the results of the two by matching the columns EventID, Role, StartTime and EndTime in the two and have the following columns in output EventID, Role, EventDuty, Qty, StartTime, EndTime, Hours and Booked?
DECLARE @EmployeeID nvarchar(1000)
DECLARE @FiscalYear nvarchar(1000)
SET @EmployeeID = '101,102,103,104,105'
SET @FiscalYear = '2013,2014'
SELECT Data FROM dbo.Split(@EmployeeID, ',')
SELECT Data FROM dbo.Split(@fiscalyear, ',')
_______________________________________
This is part of a bigger project but I am stuck on this part. I get back 2 result sets
Data Data
101 2013
102 2014
103
104
105
I want to insert the results in a new table 2 columns and get the results below.
New Table
ID Fiscal Year
101 2013
101 2014
102 2013
102 2014
103 2013
103 2014
104 2013
104 2014
105 2013
105 2014
I have a lookup table, as below. Each triggercode can have several service codes.
TriggerCodeServiceCode
BBRONZH BBRZFET
BBRONZH RDYNIP1
BBRONZP BBRZFET
BCSTICP ULDBND2
BCSTMCP RBNDLOC
I then have a table of accounts, and each account can have one to many service codes. This table also has the rate for each code.
AccountServiceCodeRate
11518801DSRDISC -2
11571901BBRZFET 5
11571901RBNDLOC 0
11571901CDHCTC 0
17412902CDHCTC1 0
14706401ULDBND2 2
14706401RBNDLOC 3
What I would like to end up with is a pivot table of each account, the trigger code and service codes attached to that account, and the rate for each.
I have been able to dynamically get the pivot, but I'm not joining correctly, as its returning every dynamic column, not just the columns of a trigger code. The code below will return the account and trigger code, but also every service code, regardless of which trigger code they belong to, and just show null values.
What I would like to get is just the service codes and the appropriate trigger code for each account.
SELECT @cols = STUFF((SELECT DISTINCT ',' + ServiceCode
FROM TriggerTable
FOR XML PATH(''), TYPE
).value('(./text())[1]', 'VARCHAR(MAX)')
,1,2,'')
[Code] ....
Using SQL Server 2005 Express:
I'd like to know how to do a SELECT Query using the following tables:
Miles Table:
Date/Car/Miles/MilesTypeID
===============
(some date)/Ford/20/1
(some date)Ford/20/2
(some date)Chevy/30/1
(some date)Toyota/50/3
(some date)Ford/30/3
Miles Type Table
MilesTypeID/MilesType
=================
1/City
2/Highway
3/Off-Road
I'd like the results to be like this:
Date/Car/City Miles/Highway Miles/Off-Road Miles
=====================================
(date)-Ford-20-0-0
(date)-Chevy-0-20-0
(date)-Ford-20-0-0
(date)-Toyota-0-0-50
(date)-Ford-0-0-30
Anyone? Thanks in advance!
I admit I am a novice to queries and stored procedures but understand stored procedures are more secure, so I am choosing to challenge myself with a stored procedure and have not been successful at all.
What I am looking for is a stored procedure which would query the single table named Hospital, which would search from a single textbox the end user would enter the text they are searching for on a Windows VB application but is dependant on a few end user selected items.
1. The end user can select a radio button either "Starts with" or "Contains"
2. The end user can select from 6 checkboxes (Hospitals, Address, City, State, Zip, Type) to limit or expand their search from the columns in the table.
The table has 17columns (CO, PARENTCO, ADDR, POBox, CITY, State, ZIP, TEL, FAX, WEBSITE, HOSP_TYPE, OWNERSHIP, BEDS, CONTACT, TITLE, Email) but I am only allowing the end user to search by the above 6 columns and need to display the above 6 columns plus the phone, fax and website columns.
After the user clicks the search button it displays the results in a listbox and the user will then select the one they want and it displays the information in another set of textboxes.
Hopefully someone can get me pointed in the right direction! Thanks for your help!
For each customer, I want to add all of their telephone numbers to a different column. That is, multiple columns (depending on the number of telephone numbers) for each customer/row. How can I achieve that?
I want my output to be
CUSTOMER ID, FIRST NAME, LAST NAME, TEL1, TEL2, TEL3, ... etc
Each 'Tel' will relate to a one or more records in the PHONES table that is linked back to the customer.
I want to do it using SELECT. Is it possible?
Hi All,
I am working on SQL Server 7.0. Every weekend we go for reindexing of some tables. I want to know if it is possible to run the re-indexing of tables in parallel so that I can save time.
Our database is of size 80GB and one table is around 22GB. Rebuilding of index on this table takes a lot of time and we are unable to index the other tables.
Any solutions/suggestions are mostly appreciated.
Regards,
Mitra
Hi
View 5 Replies View Relatedhi,
we currently use the Database Maintenance Plan to do backups for our SQL Server 2000 databases.
I notice that the database are backed up one after the other.
I would like to know how to run the backups in parallel rather than sequentially.
To do this, is there any dependency on the number of CPUs?
regards
Andrew
I just thought I would share this info:
I created the package to download 4 ftp files at once.
I set the MaxConcurrentExecutables for the SSIS package to 4. So in BIDS in downloads 4 files at the same time.
However, when I started the job I noticed that only 3 files were downloaded at the time (looking at temp files in download directory)
Solution:
Sure enough after digging around for awhile - in Step properties for SSIS package - there is execution tab - and "Maximum Concurrent Executables" was -1 (which for some reason defaults to 3 concurrent processes even on our dual CPU server) - so after chanign that value to 4 - tada - all 4 files in parallel
Hello:
I am running into an issue with RS2k PDF export.
Case: Exporting Report to PDF/Printing/TIFF
Report: Contains 1 table with 19 Columns. 1 column is static, the other 18 are visible at the users descretion. Report when printed/exported to pdf spans 2 pages naturally, 16 on the first page, 3 on the second, and the column widths have been adjusted to provide a perfect page span .
User A elects to hide two of the columns, and show the rest. The report complies and the viewable version is perfect, the excel export is perfect.. the PDF export on the first page causes every fith column, starting with the last column that was hidden to be expanded to take up additional width. On the spanned page, it renders the first column on that page correctly, then there is a white space gap equal to the width of the hidden columns and then the rest of the cells show with the last column expanded to take up the same width that the original 2 columns were going to take up, plus its width.
We have tried several different settings to see if it helps this issue or makes it worse. So far cangrow/canshrink/keep together have made no impact. It is not possible to increase the page size due to limited page size selection availablility for the client. There are far too many combinations of what the user can elect to show or hide to put together different tables to show and hide on the same report to remove this effect.
Any help or suggestion on this issue would be appreciated
Is there any way to run a stored procedure in parallel to another one? i.e. I have a stored procedure that sends an email. I then scan a table and send any unsent emails. I do not want the second part to slow the response to the user.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'd like to run 4 stored procedures in parallel on 4 different processors on our server.
Does anyone know the syntax to do that? (Could not find it on the web so far).
Anything else I need to do in addition to the specific syntax (i.e. any specific properties to set in Enterprise Manager)?
Your help is greatly appreciated!
Lana
One of the developers here wants to run a PB script consisting of 11
inserts to 11 respective tables at the same time. This is on a development
box.
Currently, we are running on MSSQL 6.5 ,sp4. We have very general
parameters set, nothing special. We have max async io set to the default
The inserts run serially now. What I need to do is run them in parallel.
My questions are:
1) How do I do this -- run in parallel?
2) What parameters do I need to set?
3)What else would I need to do?
Any information you can provide will be greatly appeciated. Thanks.
David Spaisman