Hi,
I am using Sql 7.0 with sp2. I just started as a sql dba. I have a question here, What is the importance of SID's ? When we are mapping to sql logins and user_id 's how we have to give importance regarding SID's.
Pls suggest me a good article or some suggestions...
Hi all-- there is a file in C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQLBinn direcetory called sqlctr.h which contains a lot of counter parametres..could any one tell me having its importance and can we change any of parametres to gain performance.. Thanks in advance..
// This file is generated by the description file processor. // Please do not edit.
I am thinking of an easy way to explain importance to Marketers without going into the math. This is what i came up with so far. Does this sound correct to you guys?
Reasoning:
IMPORTANCE = Log(Improvement)
Improvement=P(X&Y)/(P(x)*P(y))
Improvement= (Probability 2 products are sold together)/(random chance 2 products are sold together)
If the (Probability 2 products are sold together) = (random chance 2 products are sold together) then Improvement=1. The log(1) = 0
IMPORTANCE SCORE -2 to -1 10 to 100 times less likely than random chance -1 to 0 0 to 10 times less likely than random chance 0 to 1 0 to 10 times more likely than random chance 1 to 2 10 to 100 times more likely than random chance 2 to 3 100 to 1000 times more likely than random chance 3 to 4 1000 to 10000 times more likely than random chance 4 to 5 10000 to 100000 times more likely than random chance 5 to 6 100000 to 1000000 times more likely than random chance 6 to 7 1000000 to 10000000 times more likely than random chance
I understand Mr. MacLennan's explanation provided at http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=282651&SiteID=1 and appreciate the time he took to explain how importance works. However, like the user with username "sang", I also ran the data in BI 2005 and got the same results listed by the aforementioned user. I did this using the following data:
donut muffin
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
n y
n y
n y
n y
n y
etc.
The rule muffin -> donut has an importance of -0.105302438, which is not the same as Mr. MacLennan's results. I tried switching the roles of a and b in a -> b and using different bases on the logarithms. I don't get the result of -0.105302438 with any of these. I also tried to calculate importance with a small data set I have and can't get the results using Mr. MacLennan's explanation with that data set either. Any thoughts on the descrepancy?
hi, i have a exercise using association datamining my database have 350 records, i use 90 records for datamining and it release some rules which i choose on top of mSOLAP_NODE_SCORE, but when i use select statement to check my result i have 1 records, the same as my result, and 5 records not true; for example: rules A=a,B=b-> C=c select * from <my_table> where A='a' and B='b' and C='c'; ==>1 record return select * from <my_table> where A='a' and B='b' and C<>'c'; ==>5 records return C with 3 values c1,c2,c with the second statement C includes 2 c1 and 3 c2
i don't understand how they work. i want to choose some best rules can present my database. how can i choose importance and probability to get best rules. with database have 90 records and a database have 350 records which values i should use for minimum_probability, Minimum_Support, Minimum_importance... when i choose rules i should choose on importance or probability.
Is there a way to explicitly assign 'weights' or 'importance' factors to attributes and have that to be considered by the association rules and decision trees algorithms during training? I would like to do so without preprocessing the data (In any case, I can't think on a way to assign weight with preprocessing to boolean attributes like 'smoker')
Can anyone tell me, how the Business Ã?ntelligence Studio calculates the importance of a rule. I can't find the formula. I know some formulas, but the result in SQL Server is completly different.
Those of you who have installed SQL Server 2005 may have noticed that the installation creates several new Windows groups on the server. Do not underestimate the importance of these groups.
I try to search my data and sort the result by importance.
I'm using a MS Access database and my data (table1) looks like this:
Code:
ID NAME TEXT 1 Apples Good red apples 2 Bananas Fine yellow bananas 3 Yellow apples Great yellow apples
I want to search the data and get a result where the column "NAME" is more important than "TEXT". My SQL looks like this:
Code:
SELECT id,name,text,1 AS searchorder FROM table1 WHERE name LIKE '*yellow*' UNION SELECT id,name,text,2 AS searchorder FROM table1 WHERE text LIKE '*yellow*' ORDER BY searchorder
The output is this:
Code:
ID NAME TEXT SEARCHORDER 3 Yellow apples Great yellow apples 1 2 Bananas Fine yellow bananas 2 3 Yellow apples Great yellow apples 2
So far so good - the order by importance works - but I do not get unique columns because of the searchorder column.
Can I fix my SQL so I get unique columns where the last line of "Yellow apples" does not appear or am I lost in space?
During testing a package repetatively that deletes/inserts into several tables, over the course of several days, my package, which took 45 minutes to load 1700 XML files, began to take over 6 hours. Turns out it was an I/O bottleneck, and the Avg Disk Queue Length was around 200 and I was incurring many PAGEIOLATCH_EX. My devl machine uses a single local disk, no raid, so I had no options there, but I ran the maintenance wizard to recreate indexes/statistics and defraged the hard drive, and regained my original 45 minutes time. I guess I'll have to put a maintenance plan together to do this nightly.