This is my table type definition ( below ) and as you see I declared a table whose name is in @t
/*
CREATE TYPE BP_Data_ACRC_427
as table
(
AIMS_VALUE_NUMERIC numeric(19,2),
bp_type VARCHAR(4),
Dt datetime,
ID int IDENTITY(1,1),
MBP numeric(19,2),
MPOG_PHYSIOLOGIC_CONCEPT_ID VARCHAR(10)
)
*/
Declare @t as BP_Data_ACRC_427
Question: can we add an index that combines AIMS_VALUE_NUMERIC and Dt
How to create a script to input one table name(already indexed) to get list of all index for that table?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a filetable and use a statement like
SELECT [name],file_stream
FROM dbo.Inkoopfacturen
WHERE FREETEXT(file_stream, 'Factuur');
It will return the text found in a .pptx but not in a pdf. There are no errors in the FT-log. It tells me that the FT-index is succesfully build.
I have downloaded the iFilter for Adobe (installed it in a folder with a short name), set the temp variable to the bin folder of the installation.
I've executed the following queries:
EXEC sp_fulltext_service 'update_languages';
EXEC sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 1;
EXEC sp_fulltext_service 'restart_all_fdhosts';
Exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 0
When I run the following statement, it'll show pdf in the resultset.
SELECT * FROM sys.fulltext_document_types order by document_type
Still, content is not found.
Why should we consider selectivity of a table to create index?
Which is best selectivity value to create an index ?
I am trying to create a unique index on a table such that the combination of 2 columns is unique. How do I go about that?
View 5 Replies View RelatedWhat is the threshold that warrants the need for creating an index on a table. I have a system with a TABLE that has only 500 rows, very static, but accessed many many times. The cardinality from the statistics of Actual vs. Estimate rows is off by only 5 rows. I have all clustered index scans. What I need to be looking for as I tune this DB. I am going through every stored procedure to finely tune the DB I am supporting.
View 4 Replies View RelatedSo I declared this table data type , cool.. It works
CREATE TYPE BP_Data_XXX
as table
(
XXX_VALUE_NUMERIC numeric(19,2),
bp_type VARCHAR(4),
Dt datetime,
ID int IDENTITY(1,1),
MBP numeric(19,2),
CONCEPT_ID VARCHAR(10)
)
Now my question is later how do we check whether this type exists. The following does not work.
if( object_id('BP_Data_XXX') IS NOT NULL )
print 'IT is there '
I have a table with clustered index on that. I have only 5 columns in that table. Execution plan is showing that Index scan occurred. What are the cause of the Index scan how can we change that to index seek?
I am giving that kind of similar query below
SELECT @ProductID= ProductID FROM Product WITH (NOLOCK) WHERE SalesID= '@salesId' and Product = 'Clothes '
I need to create a Clustered Index (CI) on a very large SQL Server 2012 database table. This table has about approximately 10 billion rows, 500 GB in size. The job ran for about 20 hours into it and then fails with error: "Out of disk space in tempdb". My tempDB size is 1.8TB, but yet it's still not enough.
Here is my script:
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX CI_IndexName
ON TableName(Column1,Column2)
WITH (MAXDOP= 4, ONLINE=ON, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = ON, DATA_COMPRESSION=PAGE)
ON sh_WeekDT(Day_DT)
GO
What is the impact on the users to drop an index on a table while in use? I will recreate the index afterwards. The table is used constantly by a three of processes/users at all times.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI was under impression that rebuilding index online largely means that the index will remain available for use during rebuild and my procs and query will be able to use it during rebuild. Also my understanding was that table will be locked very briefly while the schema change will be completing.But when I was rebuilding the clustered index online on a large table with some 3 million records, the table got locked and I was not able even to read the data from it for some 5 minutes. Then I cancelled the operation as it was production server and it was one of our main transaction table.
Is rebuilding index online supposed to work this way? The table has no other index.The parameteres I used are:
REBUILD WITH (PAD_INDEX = ON, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = ON, ONLINE = ON, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 95)
I have created NONCLUSTERED index on table but my report is taking more time that's why i created columnstore NONCLUSTERED index on the same table but i have one query, if any table have row and column level index(same columns in index) . Which index query will consider.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI understand that minimal logging can occur on a non clustered indexed heap as long as [URL] ...
*not replicated
*tablock is used
*table is empty
The following test seems to contradict this
In the test I create a non indexed heap, insert some record and check the log, then repeat the test on an indexed heap.
The results suggest that even though the conditions for minimal logging into a indexed heap are met, minimal logging is not happening although it does happen on an non indexed heap. What am I doing wrong?
CREATE DATABASE logtest
GO
USE logtest
GO
CREATE TABLE test (field varchar(100))
GO
CHECKPOINT
[Code] ....
I have a table (we will cal DateTable) with several (20) columns, each being a date type. Another table's (Project) PK is referenced in the DateTable.
I am trying to write a query that will pull all dates for a specific project from the DateTable if they meet certain criteria(i.e. if the date is <= 7 days from now.
I started with a normal select statement selecting each column with a join to the project and then a where clause using
(DateTable.ColumnName BETWEEN GETDATE() AND DATEADD(day, 7, GETDATE()) OR (DateTable.ColumnName BETWEEN GETDATE() AND DATEADD(day, 7, GETDATE())) ...
The rest of the columns(all with OR between them).
The problem with this is that because I am using OR once one of the dates meets the criteria it selects all the dates that are associated with the project. I ONLY want the dates that meet the criteria and don't care about the rest.
Obviously because I have all the columns in the select statement... So I need something like
Select ALL Columns
from DateTable d
Join Project p
where p.ProjectID = d.ProjectID AND only dates BETWEEN GETDATE() AND DATEADD(day, 7, GETDATE()))
I am using Full Text Index to index emails stored in BLOB column in a table. Index process parses stored emails, and, if there is one or more files attached to the email these documents get indexed too. In result when I'm querying the full text index for a word or phrase I am getting reference to the email containing the word of phrase if interest if the word was used in the email body OR if it was used in any document attached to the email.
How to distinguish in a Full Text query that the result came from an embedded document rather than from "main" document? Or if that's not possible how to disable indexing of embedded documents?
My goal is either to give a user an option if he or she wants to search emails (email bodies only) OR emails AND documents attached to them, or at least clearly indicate in the returned result the real source where the word or phrase has been found.
Hi all,I have a table called PTRANS with few columns (see create script below).I have created a view on top that this table VwTransaction (See below)I can now run this query without a problem:select * from dbo.VwTransactionwhereAssetNumber = '101001' andTransactionDate <= '7/1/2003'But when I create an index on the PTRANS table using the command below:CREATE INDEX IDX_PTRANS_CHL# ON PTRANS(CHL#)The same query that ran fine before, fails with the error:Server: Msg 242, Level 16, State 3, Line 1The conversion of a char data type to a datetime data type resulted inan out-of-range datetime value.I can run the same query by commeting out the AssetNumber clause and itworks fine. I can also run the query commenting out the TransactionDatecolumn and it works fine. But when I have both the conditions in theWHERE clause, it gives me this error. Dropping the index solves theproblem.Can anyone tell me why an index would cause a query to fail?Thanks a lot in advance,AmirCREATE TABLE [PTRANS] ([CHL#] [varchar] (100) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,[CHCENT] [numeric](2, 0) NOT NULL ,[CHYYMM] [numeric](4, 0) NOT NULL ,[CHDAY] [numeric](2, 0) NOT NULL ,[CHTC] [char] (2) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL) ON [PRIMARY]GOCREATE VIEW dbo.vwTransactionsASSELECT CONVERT(datetime, dbo.udf_AddDashes(REPLICATE('0', 2 -LEN(CHCENT)) + CONVERT(varchar, CHCENT) + REPLICATE('0', 4 -LEN(CHYYMM))+ CONVERT(varchar, CHYYMM) + REPLICATE('0', 2 -LEN(CHDAY)) + CONVERT(varchar, CHDAY)), 20) AS TransactionDate,CHL# AS AssetNumber,CHTC AS TransactionCodeFROM dbo.PTRANSWHERE (CHCENT <> 0) AND (CHTC <> 'RA')*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a clustered index that consists of 3 int columns in this order: DateKey, LocationKey, ItemKey (there are many other columns in this data warehouse table such as quantities, prices, etc.).
Now I want to add a non-clustered index on just one of the other columns, say LocationKey, like this:
CREATE INDEX IX_test on TableName (LocationKey)
I understand that the clustered index keys will also be added as key columns to any NC indexes. So, in this case the NC index will also get the other two columns from the clustered index added as key columns. But, in what order will they be added?
Will the resulting index keys on this new NC index effectively be:
LocationKey, DateKey, ItemKey
OR
LocationKey, ItemKey, DateKey
Do the clustering keys get added to a NC index in the same order as they are defined in the clustered index?
Hi,
I'm running a merge replication on a sql2k machine to 6 sql2k subscribers.
Since a few day's only one of the merge agents fail's with the following error:
The merge process could not retrieve generation information at the 'Subscriber'.
The index entry for row ID was not found in index ID 3, of table 357576312, in database 'PBB006'.
All DBCC CHECKDB command's return 0 errors :confused:
I'm not sure if the table that's referred to in the message is on the distribution side or the subscribers side? A select * from sysobjects where id=357576312 gives different results on both sides . .
Any ideas as to what is causing this error?
Hi everyone,
When we create a clustered index firstly, and then is it advantageous to create another index which is nonclustered ??
In my opinion, yes it is. Because, since we use clustered index first, our rows are sorted and so while using nonclustered index on this data file, finding adress of the record on this sorted data is really easier than finding adress of the record on unsorted data, is not it ??
Thanks
I like to define my procedure parameter type to match a referenced table colum type,
similar to PL/SQL "table.column%type" notation.
That way, when the table column is changes, I would not have to change my stored proc.
Any suggestion?
Is there a syntax to create indexes on user-defined type's fields and methods? Can I index UDT-fields?
I tried but only get syntax error.
Code Snippet
-- put an index on the picture luminance
CREATE INDEX myIdx ON myTbl(picMetaData.Brightness) -- !! error
GO
Error message:
Code Snippet
Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Line 1
Incorrect syntax near '.'.
According to books online (BOL), section User-defined types requirements says
In the SQL Server 2005 RTM version, CLR UDTs with user-defined serialization were allowed to have their fields indexed as part of non-persisted computed columns or views. In such situations, non-deterministic UDT serialization/deserialization could lead to index corruption, and therefore has been removed from SQL Server 2005 SP1. In SQL Server 2005 SP1, UDT fields must use native serialization or be persisted in order to be indexed. Any existing indexes on UDT fields should continue to function as before.
What are BOL trying to say about index on UDT fields?
Thanks for any hints!
I have a table with primary key and also clustered index on that primary key column. I need almost all columns from that table. When I wrote the select column names, it showing that Index scan occurred. How can I avoid that Index scan and change to index seek? When I check the fragmentation of that Index it is showing more than 34%. Is that fragmentation is ok or do I need to reorg the Index?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a question regarding indexes.
If i have cluster and NC index on same column,does it degrade performance on DML statements ? any advantage on select statements.
Is it good to have both indexes on same column ?
observed below error in sqlserver2012.index was out of range. Must be non-negative and less than the size of the collection.
View 2 Replies View Relatedhow to fragment an index so I can test it's fragmented performance on an iSCSI LUN.I can test without an index, that's fine. I can test with a newly created index (of course that means it's not fragmented) and that's fine.But what I want to do is DELIBERATELY FRAGMENT () an index to 90%+ fragmented to test it's performance.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am experiencing of problem relating to the error message on the production SQLServer2012;
Index was outside the bounds of array. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)
I want to know more details about the Clustered Index Delete. Is that Clustered Index Delete in the execution plan is good or bad or we can neglect that cost. Is there any way to avoid that clustered Index delete operator from the execution plan.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWhen creating a column store index, are there any reasons not to include all columns, besides index size of course? i.e. will the index be more versatile with more columns or should I treat it exactly like its a standard index, putting only necessary columns, in the correct order?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have few tables where we do truncate load or only do insert activities , why do the cluster index get fragmented very often to > 80%?
View 9 Replies View RelatedWhen I go to SQL 2012 through SSMS 2005, I get the message Index outside the bounds of array. Will it fix if I install SSMS 2012? Do I need to remove SSMS 2005?
View 1 Replies View Related- What are your thoughts on adding clustered index on datetime (createdDate , native GUID) column. The data will be be physically organized in the clustered index allowing range operations to perform its duties. But will the GUID column make any impact ( drawbacks) should it be made part of the clustered key ?
The GUID column will provide the lookup with the required indexes to support.
We have a large table with many columns and many indexes. One poorly performing query is having to do a key lookup when the where clause includes a particular column with no covering index.
Are you generally better off adding a new index or adding the column to an existing index ( included columns )Column: LAST_STATE_RESPONSE_CODE
The Query Processor estimates that implementing the following index could improve the query cost by 88.9332%.
*/
/*
USE [ database name]
GO
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [<Name of Missing Index, sysname,>]
ON [dbo].[SERVICE_REQUEST] ([BUSINESS_PROCESS_STATUS],[[color=#F00]LAST_STATE_RESPONSE_CODE[size="3"][/size][/color]],[CONCRETE_TYPE])
INCLUDE ([LIENHOLDER_PERFORMING_LIEN_FILING_ID],[MAKE],[YEAR],[MANUFACTURER_ID],[CLIENT_ID])
GO
I was reading this blog below about Indexed Views and needed some clarification.
When the author choose to create the unique clustered index he excluded the PER.BusinessEntityID columns and only included, (CustomerID, SalesOrderID, ProductID).
Why didn't the PER.BusinessEntityID get added?
[URL] ....
CREATE VIEW Sales.vSalesSummaryCustomerProduct
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT CUST.CustomerID ,
SOH.SalesOrderID ,
SOD.ProductID ,
SUM(SOD.OrderQty) AS TotalOrderQty ,
[Code] .....