I need to update the account_status and show the audit in the ssrs report.
I wrote the following query in the ssrs report but when I click on refresh fields it is throwing error incorrect syntax near output
Declare @username nvarchar(50)
Declare @UserStatus Table
(id bigint,
Username nvarchar(50),
Oldaccount_status varchar(255),
Newaccount_status varchar(255))
[Code] .....
I am trying to update a table and then also use OUTPUT clause to capture some of the columns. The code that I am using is something like the one below
UPDATE s
SET Exception_Ind = 1
OUTPUT s.Master_Id, s.TCK_NR
INTO #temp2
FROM Master_Summary s
INNER JOIN Exception d
ON d.Id = LEFT(s.Id, 8)
AND d.Barcode_Num = s.TCK_NR
WHERE s.Exception_Ind IS NULL
The above code is throwing an error as follows:
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Process_Step3, Line 113
The multi-part identifier "s.Master_Id" could not be bound.
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Process_Step3, Line 113
The multi-part identifier "s.TCK_NR" could not be bound.
I'm looking at various methods for deleting duplicate rows. Among the alternatives, one works just fine but gives me results that make me go?.
Consider this script:
declare @t table (a int, b int, c int, d int, e int)
insert into @t (a, b, c, d, e) values
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5),
(3, 4, 2, 3, 4),
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
select a,b,c,d,e, rn = row_number() over (
partition by a,b,c,d,e
[Code] ....
The code works -- that is, the duplicate row is deleted. However the output clause returns:
abcdern
123451
So....why? Why does the output clause show that the row with rn=1 was deleted, when the where clause stipulates rn > 1?
I am trying to update a table and then also use OUTPUT clause to capture some of the columns. The code that I am using is something like the one below
UPDATE s
SET Exception_Ind = 1
OUTPUT s.Master_Id, s.TCK_NR
INTO #temp2
FROM Master_Summary s
INNER JOIN Exception d
ON d.Id = LEFT(s.Id, 8)
AND d.Barcode_Num = s.TCK_NR
WHERE s.Exception_Ind IS NULL
The above code is throwing an error as follows:
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Process_Step3, Line 113
The multi-part identifier "s.Master_Id" could not be bound.
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Process_Step3, Line 113
The multi-part identifier "s.TCK_NR" could not be bound.
I have a temporary table #Temp with, among others, a column CountryCode and a column Lastname.I would like to change the ü that appears in some names to u (u umlaut to a plain u), but only for those that have the nationality 'Ned'
My code so far:
Update #Temp
set LastName = replace(Lastname, 'ü', 'ue') WHERE CountryCode = 'Ned'
This code deletes all entries in the column Lastname
I think it must be easy, but I keep staring at the code.
What to do?
Hi,
I'm copying records from table A to Table B. On "insert" being successful I want to delete the copied records from table A. I want to use one single transaction. Could I use OUTPUT to delete all records in table A which key matches the ones on "inserted" ?. I believe it could be possible but I have tried several ways without any luck.
INSERT INTO Table A (Field 1, Field 2)
OUTPUT (DELETE Table B WHERE Key = (SELECT Key FROM Inserted))
SELECT (Field1, Field 2) FROM TABLE B
Or something like that,
Thank you
I would like to add more columns on output clause while insert....
Following are the table formats used here ...
Table1 (col1, col2)
Table2 (col1, col2, col3, col4)
MyTable (C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6)
Insert into Table1 (col1, col2)
Output Inserted.col1, inserted.col2,MyTable.C3, MyTable.C4 into Table2
select C1,C2 from MyTable
Now the Output statement retrives only the Inserted.col1, inserted.col2 values, But I want to add MyTable.C3, MyTable.C4 values from the table <MyTable>
Is there any way to achieve this....
Thanks...
In the past when inserting a record into a table with an identity column, to return the new identity value I used one of SCOPE_IDENTITY, IDENT_CURRENT, and @@IDENTITY.
Question: will this sql 2005 approach also provide the newly added identity value?
insert into TestTable -- ID column of testtable is an Identity field
output inserted.id, inserted.col1 into @insertedRecords
values('row 20')
select ID from @insertedRecords
TIA,
Barkingdog
.
I would like to add more columns on output clause while insert....
Following are the table formats used here ...
Table1 (col1, col2)
Table2 (col1, col2, col3, col4)
MyTable (C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6)
Insert into Table1 (col1, col2)
Output Inserted.col1, inserted.col2,MyTable.C3, MyTable.C4 into Table2
select C1,C2 from MyTable
Now the Output statement retrives only the Inserted.col1, inserted.col2 values, But I want to add MyTable.C3, MyTable.C4 values from the table <MyTable>
Is there any way to achieve this....
Thanks...
I need to update a table using a stored procedure that "UPSERTS". In this case, @OfficeId is passed with ParameterDirection.OutputSo when I update I assign the value to OfficeId like this (the office id value is being correctly assigned): SqlParameter OfficeIdParam = new SqlParameter("@OfficeId", SqlDbType.Int, 4); if (_officeId > 0) { OfficeIdParam.Value = _officeId; } OfficeIdParam.Direction = ParameterDirection.Output; The following segment of the stored procedure is throwing an error that the OfficeId does not exist: Update --- @OfficeId int output if not exists (select 1 from ORG_Office where OfficeId=@OfficeId) begin RAISERROR ('OfficeId does not exist in ORG_Office: E002', 16, 1) -- OfficeId does not exist. return -1 end May this approach work, and if the operation turns out to be an Insert I may do this:select @error_code = @@ERROR, @OfficeId= scope_identity() Thank you,jspurlin
View 1 Replies View RelatedGet output of SQL Procedure and assign it to a variable used in WHERE Clause
Later I want to use this variable in my code in the WHERE Clause
Declare @ProjectNo nvarchar(10)
--Now I want to assign it to output of a storedprocedure which returns only 1 value and use it in the below SELECT query.
SELECT ID from TABLEA where Project in (@ProjectNo)
How to do it. How to assign @ProjectNo to output of storedProcedure called 'GetProjNumber'
Arvind writes "i want to create a stored procedure returns an OUTPUT variable containing the no. of records given by a query, the query being dynamic.
Preferrably the query should also be passed as a parameter to the stored procedure...If not,it should be constructed in the SP and a Part of the where clause is dependant on the value of another variable passed to the SP.
How should the query be constructed, executed, and then the Count(*) value returned?
"WHERE <condition1> AND <condition 2> ;
"AND <condition 2> " may exist or may not exist in the query; it is dependant."
I was trying to copy child records of one parent record into another, and wanted to report back new child record id and corresponding child record id that was used to create it. I ran into run-time error with OUTPUT clause. Following is a script that will duplicate the situation I ran into:
CREATE TABLE Parent(
ParentID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY,
ParentName VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL)
GO
CREATE TABLE Child(
ChildID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY,
ParentID INT NOT NULL REFERENCES Parent(ParentID),
ChildName VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL)
GO
INSERT INTO Parent(ParentName) VALUES('Parent 1')
INSERT INTO Parent(ParentName) VALUES('Parent 2')
GO
INSERT INTO Child(ParentID, ChildName) VALUES(1, 'Child 1')
INSERT INTO Child(ParentID, ChildName) VALUES(1, 'Child 2')
GO
At this stage, there Child table looks like:
ChildID
ParentID
ChildName
1
1
Child 1
2
1
Child 2
What I want to do is copy Parent 1€™s children to Parent 2, and report back which source ChildID that was used to create the new child records. So I wrote the query:
DECLARE @LinkTable TABLE (FromChildID INT, ToChildID INT)
INSERT INTO Child(ParentID, ChildName)
OUTPUT c.ChildID, inserted.ChildID INTO @LinkTable
SELECT 2, c.ChildName
FROM Child c
WHERE c.ParentID = 1
SELECT * FROM @LinkTable
In the end I was expecting Child table to look like:
ChildID
ParentID
ChildName
1
1
Child 1
2
1
Child 2
3
2
Child 1
4
2
Child 2
and OUTPUT clause to return me:
FromChildID
ToChildID
1
3
Child record with ID 3 was created using ID of 1.
2
4
Child record with ID 4 was created using ID of 2.
But infact I€™m getting following error:
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Line 9
The multi-part identifier "c.ChildID" could not be bound.
Any ideas on how to fix the OUTPUT clause in the query to return me the expected output?
Thanks
Yogesh
Suppose we have the following table in our database;
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[PERMISSION](
[ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[USERID] [int] NOT NULL,
[STARTTIME] [smalldatetime] NOT NULL,
[ENDTIME] [smalldatetime] NOT NULL,
[REASON] [nvarchar](250) NULL,
[PERMISSIONTYPEID] [int] NOT NULL,
[code]....
This code works pretty well. But I don't want to do this with "select" since there is OUTPUT clause in T-SQL. So the CommandText property will be changed into this;
command.CommandText = @"insert PERMISSION
output INSERTED.ID, INSERTED.CREATETIME into @outID, @outCREATETIME
values(2, getdate(), getdate(), 'sdfg', 1, DEFAULT);";
well, not only this statement gives an error while executing; but also, no such usage defined in the
documentation of OUTPUT Clause. Actually the documentation tell us to use Temporary Tables for that. So I have to change CommandText into this;
command.CommandText = @"DECLARE @MyTableVar table(ID int, CREATETIME smalldatetime);
insert PERMISSION
output INSERTED.ID, INSERTED.CREATETIME into @MyTableVar
code]....
No temporary tables required; thus, no "type spesific" things required. This way is easier to create dynamic queries though. Only,the RETURNING INTO clause.So, I was wondering; why MS-SQL (T-SQL) forces users to "declare a temporary table (type specific)" and "execute select on the temporary table in order to assign values to output parameters" while using "the OUTPUT Clause". Comparing to the Oracle's sample I'm just using "the RETURNING INTO Clause in order to assign values to output parameters" and that's it; very easy and dynamic. To Summarize, Oracle's RETURNING INTO Clause is better than MS-SQL's OUTPUT Clause, but in fact they're doing the same job.
Hello,
I am facing a problem in a SELECT clause which i cannot solve.
In my SQL table ("myTable") i have a few columns ("Column1", "Column2", "TypeColumn"). When I select different columns of the table, instead of getting the value of TypeColumn, i would like to get a boolean indicating whether its value is a certain string or not.
For example, the TypeColumn accepts only a number of selected strings: "AAA", "BBB", "CCC".
when i do a select query on the table, instead of asking for TypeColumn i would like to ask a boolean value of 1 if TypeColumn is "AAA" and 0 if TypeColumn is "BBB" or "CCC". Also, i would like to make this query while I am also fetching the other columns. And i would like to use one query to get all that. I thought something like thsi would work:
SELECT Column1 AS Col1, Column2 AS Col2, IF(TypeColumn = "AAA", 1, 0) AS Col3
FROM myTable
but this doesn't work in SQL 2005!
Is it possible to do something similar in SQL 2005 using one query only? i am trying to avoid multiple queries for this.
thanks a lot for your help!
I'd like to update the attribute Active of the table COMPANY_BRANCH to the value 0 (or false, since it is a bin field) on the below recordset:
SELECT COMPANY_BRANCH.CompBranchID, MAX(PLACEMENT.ExpirationDate) AS Expr1
FROM COMPANY_BRANCH INNER JOIN
PLACEMENT ON COMPANY_BRANCH.CompBranchID = PLACEMENT.ProducerBranchID
GROUP BY COMPANY_BRANCH.CompBranchID
HAVING (MAX(PLACEMENT.ExpirationDate) < DATEADD(yyyy, - 1, GETDATE()))
yet, I am unable to understand the concept on how this can be done. If I put it into query designer and change the query type to update, the code that gets generated is not correct - can someone help me?
Hi,
I'm trying to inner join an update statement.
Something like this:
update #point_connection_temp AS a inner join #point_connection_temp_two as b on a.key_fld = b.key_fld set a.next_point = b.next_point
where #point_connection_temp.next_point is null
order by a.key_fld
I'm getting an error message:Incorrect syntax error near AS
Any help will be greatly appreciated.Thank you!!!!!!!!!1
MySQL has a ON UPDATE clause which can be used as given below:create table t(col1 varchar(90), time_col timestamp NOT NULL default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP on update CURRENT_TIMESTAMP);Whenever a column (col1) is updated time_col will also be updated with curren time stamp. Is there any equivaent in SQL ServerAm aware that this could be handled using Triggers, is there any other better solution.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI could write a query with a sub-query in order to perform an UPDATE on the most recent 60,000 records of a table based on a date field, but unfortunately I am receiving an error.
Code:
SELECT * FROM DMTM
SET transmit_date = '2012-05-07 00:00:00.000', transmit_status = '1223'
WHERE temp_pk in
[code]...
Hi All,In Oracle, I can easily make this query :UPDATE t1 SET (f1,f2)=(SELECT AVG(f3),SUM(f4)FROM t2WHERE t2.f5=t1.f6)WHERE f5='Something'I cannot seem to be able to do the same thing with MS-SQL. There areonly 2 ways I've figured out, and I fear performance cost in both cases,which are these :1)UPDATE t1 SET f1=(SELECT AVG(f3)FROM t2WHERE t2.f5=t1.f6)WHERE f5='Something'and then the same statement but with f2, and2)UPDATE t1 SET f1=(SELECT AVG(f3)FROM t2WHERE t2.f5=t1.f6),f2=(SELECT SUM(f4)FROM t2WHERE t2.f5=t1.f6)WHERE f5='Something'Is there a way with MS-SQL to do the Oracle equivalent in this case ?Thanks,Michel
View 3 Replies View RelatedHello,
I'm collecting id based on user's selection and storing to ArrayList/String[in asp.net]. Now want to pass those ids stored to stroed procedure. I want SP to update all records in single statement using in like update table set field in (value).
I'm storing id with comma (,) separator. Below is my asp.net code:
string sId=string.Empty;
for(int a=0;a<Id.Count;a++)
{
Id += Id;
if(a!=Id.Count-1)
sId +=",";
}
In database id column is int type. I'm passing id collected with comma separator and passing it as a parameter to SP. but it is giving error related converting to int or similar.
Plz help me create Stored Procedure in SQL 2005 based on above scenario.
Thanks
I have a table (GLTRANS) with thousands of lines.
1 column in the table (ACCNO) has 300 different values which all need to change to a new value.
ie. 11100 all change to 8100
11200 all change to 8200
I know how to do a simple UPDATE
UPDATE GLTRANS
SET ACCNO = '8100'
WHERE ACCNO = '11100'
But how can i combine into 1 script rather than having to continually change this script 300 times??
Thanks
Wilbur
We're getting
Msg 1013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The objects "MYTEST2.TEST" and "mytest.TEST" in the FROM clause have the same exposed names. Use correlation names to distinguish them.use of fully qualified names is allowed without having to alias them.One workaround is changing compatibility mode to 80.Is there another (startup flag?).Reason for no alias: MS Reportbuilder doesn't provide them when building queries
CREATE SCHEMA MYTEST;
go
CREATE SCHEMA MYTEST2;
go
CREATE TABLE MYTEST.TEST
[code]....
Looking to coalesce a WHERE clause with XML data. I cannot supply test data.
If 472 is null, check the NEXT XML field at grab the 150, if both 472 AND 150 do NOT exist let it be NULL.
set @Date = (select top 1 XL.value('(DTM/DTM.02/DTM.02.1)[1]', 'varchar(100)') from #src
where coalesce(XL.value('(DTM/DTM.01/DTM.01.1)[1]', 'varchar(50)') = '472', '(DTM/DTM.01/DTM.01.1)[1]', 'varchar(50)') = '150')
I have an SSIS package which uses variables and foreach loop containers so connect to multiple instances to retrieve config data. I am adding an extra step to include the port of each instance.
I used a select from a central table to get the connection strings, which is put into [User::Server2]
1) execute SQL task to collect the port
(DECLARE @portNumber NVARCHAR(10)
EXEC xp_instance_regread
@rootkey = 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE',
@key =
'SoftwareMicrosoftMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQLServerSuperSocketNetLibTcpIpAll',
@value_name = 'TcpPort',
@value = @portNumber OUTPUT
)
Which is then put into a variable @Portnumber
2) I then need to insert this into a certain server with a where clause including another variable
so something like
"INSERT INTO DBO.InstanceConfig VALUES ('"+@[User::Portnumber]+"') where Serverinstance = ('"+@[User::Server2]+"')
but it doesnt work like that.. is there an easier way
I have used the below update query. However, its updating only the first value. Like its updating AB with volume when c.Type = ABC, similarly for CD. Its not updating based on the 2nd or the next case condition.
Â
Update XYZ Set AB = a.Amt * (CASE WHEN c.Type = 'ABC'Â THENÂ (c.volume)
 WHEN c.TYPE = 'DEF' THEN (c.volume)
 WHEN c.Type = 'GHI' THEN (c.volume)
 Else 0
 END),
 CD = CASE WHEN c.Type = 'MARGIN' THEN '4105.31'
 WHEN c.Type = 'ABC' THEN '123.1'
 WHEN c.Type = 'DEF' THEN '234.2'
WHEN c.Type = 'GHI' THEN '567.1'
END
 from table1 a join table2 b
 on a.Cust = b.Customer
 join table3 c
 on b.account = c.account and b.channel =c.channel
Why its not working properly? But if i use Select statement instead of update query its working properly.
From MS Dynamics NAV 2013 I get a lot of querries that have a where clause like this:
where [Field1] like @p1 and [Field1] < @p2.
Field1 is the only primary key field and clustered index. The query also has a TOP 50 clause.
@p1 is always a "Starts-With"-value (something like N'abc%').
The query plan uses a clustered index seek but the number of reads look more like a clustered index scan.
Depending on the table size I see 1M or more reads for these querries.
If I rebuild the query in SSMS, but replace the paramerters with actual values I only see a few reads.
I was able to reproduce the issue with a temp table. See code below.
Is there a way to make SQL Server use another strategy when using the parameterized query?
SQL Server Version is 11.0.3401.
if object_id('tempdb..#tbl') is not null
drop table #tbl;
create table #tbl
(
[No] nvarchar(20)
,[Description1] nvarchar(250)
[Code] ....
Right now I have to do something like this and it is time consuming every time I have to query a specific table...
SELECT lots_of_columns
FROM table
WHERE (column5 = '1' OR column6 = '1' OR column7 = '1' OR column8 = '1' OR column9 = '1' OR column10 = '1' OR column11 = '1' OR column12 = '1')
AND other_query_critiera_here
Typing out the OR statement gets long, time consuming and prone to errors because that first where line with all the ORs can sometimes have 20+ ORs in it. As some insight, the columns are text columns, sometimes they have data, sometimes they are NULL. Sometimes they have the same data (i.e., column5 and column6 and column12 could both have '1' as values).
How SQL calculates the estimated row count when < or > are used in the WHERE clause of a statement. For example:-
WHERE Created_Datetime_utc > CONVERT(DATETIME,'2014-10-14 10:00:00',102)
I know how the estimated number of rows are calculated when an = is used but I've been googling and cannot find anything about < and >.
I found a code snippet that use the curious following sintax on the creation of View:
CREATE VIEW [dbo].[vw_EvenValues]
AS
SELECT [TestColumn]
FROM [dbo].[TestTable]
WHERE [TestColumn] % 2 = 1
[code]....
IF [TestColumn] on the Select is varchar, then error occurs and say:"Conversion failed when converting for the varchar value 'A001' to data type int"
I would like to be able to combine the functionality of IN and LIKE in a WHERE clause. Although the simple AdventureWorks2012 example below illustrates the concept with 3 search criteria, the real-world example I need to apply the concept to has a couple dozen. This returns 50 rows, but requires multiple OR ... LIKE functions:
SELECT DISTINCT c.Name
FROM Sales.Store c
WHERE c.Name LIKE '% sports %'
OR c.Name LIKE '% exercise %'
OR c.Name LIKE '%toy%'
What I would like to do is something like this, which doesn't work:
SELECT DISTINCT c.Name
FROM Sales.Store c
WHERE c.Name IN(LIKE '% sports %', LIKE '% exercise %', LIKE '%toy%')
I could load up a cursor and loop through it, but the syntax is more cumbersome than the multiple LIKE statements, not to mention most SQL programmers are horrified at the mention of the abominable word 'cursor' for performance reasons.
A while back, a "quirky update" method was proposed for lightning fast running totals based on the three-part MSSQL UPDATE's SET statement and tally tables. However, some claimed this was not 100% absolutely guaranteed behavior.
How does the new OVER clause compare in terms of performance ?
DECLARE @Tbl TABLE
(
pk int not null primary key identity,
N int
)
INSERT INTO @Tbl (N) SELECT TOP 1000 1 FROM syscolumns a CROSS JOIN syscolumns b
SELECT pk, SUM(pk) OVER (ORDER BY pk )
FROM @Tbl
I am creating a dynamic query where i am appending a where clause something like -
IF (@CurCaptureDate IS NOT NULL)
SET @where_clause = @where_clause + CHAR(10) + 'AND CD.CaptureDate = ' + @CurCaptureDate
PS - CD.CaptureDate is datetime and @CurCaptureDate is also datetime
but when executing , it gives this error - Msg 241, Level 16, State 1, Line 169 Conversion failed when converting date and/or time from character string.
i am not able to use convert here with these quotes.
i tried this - SET @where_clause = @where_clause + CHAR(10) + 'AND CD.CaptureDate = ' + CONVERT(VARCHAR(25),@CurCaptureDate )
but it makes it to -
AND CD.CaptureDate = Jul 19 2014 12:00AM. I would need the date in quotes.