Searching Thru Stored Procs Via The Sys Tables

Sep 3, 2003

Basically, I want to be able to have a stored procedure that will search through all the stored procedures looking for a given string and returning the names of all the stored procs that contain that string value.

I know I can script it off and then do a text search in Notepad or whatever, but I figured there must be a more elegant way to do it. More than likely dealing with the DB sys tables.

Is there already a tool in SQL Server that does this? Or has anybody had a chance to roll their own?

Thanks,
Tim

View 4 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

How To Search And List All Stored Procs In My Database. I Can Do This For Tables, But Need To Figure Out How To Do It For Stored Procedures

Apr 29, 2008

How do I search for and print all stored procedure names in a particular database? I can use the following query to search and print out all table names in a database. I just need to figure out how to modify the code below to search for stored procedure names. Can anyone help me out?
 SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA + '.' + TABLE_NAME
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE'

View 1 Replies View Related

Working With SQL Server Temp Tables In Stored Procs

Nov 18, 2005

I am trying to create a SQL data adapter via the wizard, however, I get
the error "Invalid object name #ords" because the stored procedure uses
a temp table. Anyway around this? Thanks.

View 11 Replies View Related

$100 USD To The Winner... Stored Procs, Temporary Tables And Cursors... Oh My!

Oct 14, 2001

I'm so desperate, I'll pay $100 to the proper solution to this problem. I'm sure it's an easy fix, but I'm wasting more money every day trying to figure it out...

I have a table with hierarchial data in it (see the bottom tabledef) and I need to query an "indented outline" of the records in it for a tree control on a website. To do that I have to perform some sort of recursive or nested query or I can do all that manipulation in a temporary table/cursor... However, even though the resultset will display when I check the query, when I try to open it using ADO, I get a recordcount of -1.... it's very frustrating and extremely important.

I'd rather pay an expert here than try to navigate a tech help line.

ConnIS is defined in an earlier include file...

Set oCmd = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Command")
Set oCmd.ActiveConnection = ConnIS
oCmd.CommandText = "dbo.Expandset" 'Name of SP
oCmd.CommandType = adCmdStoredProc 'ADO constant for 4
Set oTmp = oCmd.CreateParameter("@current", adInteger, adParamInput,, 892)
oCmd.Parameters.Append oTmp
Set oRs = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset")
oRs.Open oCmd
Response.Write oRs.RecordCount & "<hr>"
oRs.Close
Set oRs=Nothing


This code generates the following result when run from an active server page:

-1<hr>

When I execute the raw SQL code ("exec Expandset 892") against the stored proc in the query analyzer, I get:

item tier
----------- -----------
892 1
948 2
895 2
946 2
945 2
893 2
894 3
944 2
943 2
904 2
896 3
897 4
901 2
903 3
902 3
900 2
947 2
899 2

The source for the stored proc is:
------------------------------------------------------
CREATE PROCEDURE Expandset (@current int) as
SET NOCOUNT ON
DECLARE @level int, @line char(20)
CREATE TABLE #stack (item int, tier int)
CREATE TABLE #output (item int, tier int)
INSERT INTO #stack VALUES (@current, 1)
SELECT @level = 1
WHILE @level > 0
BEGIN
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM #stack WHERE tier = @level)
BEGIN
SELECT @current = item
FROM #stack
WHERE tier = @level
SELECT @line = space(@level - 1) + convert(varchar,@current)
INSERT INTO #output (item, tier) values (@current, @level)
DELETE FROM #stack
WHERE tier = @level
AND item = @current
INSERT #stack
SELECT ID, @level + 1
FROM SITE_Container
WHERE parent = @current
IF @@ROWCOUNT > 0
SELECT @level = @level + 1
END
ELSE
SELECT @level = @level - 1
END
SELECT O.item, O.tier FROM #output O
-------------------------------------------------------------------

The relevant portions of the Table definitions for SITE_Container are:

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[SITE_Container] (
[ID] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,
[Parent] [int] NULL)

-------------------------------------------------------------------

My contact information is:

Jared Nielsen
PO Box 600271
Jacksonville, FL 32260
904-230-1688
888-316-2357 vm / fax

View 3 Replies View Related

Stored Procs: Is There A Way To Divide Up (or Namespace) Groups Of Stored Procs

Jan 15, 2008

Is there a way to namespace groups of stored procs to reduce confusion when using them?

For C# you can have ProjectName.ProjectSection.Classname when naming a class. I am just wondering if there is a way to do the same with SQL stored procs. I know Oracle has packages and the name of the package provides a namespace for all of the stored procs inside it.

View 1 Replies View Related

Problem With Using Stored Procs As I/p To Another Stored Procs

May 7, 2004

HI,

CREATE PROCEDURE PROC1
AS
BEGIN
SELECT A.INTCUSTOMERID,A.CHREMAIL,B.INTPREFERENCEID,C.CHR PREFERENCEDESC
FROM CUSTOMER A
INNER JOIN CUSTOMERPREFERENCE B
ON A.INTCUSTOMERID = B.INTCUSTOMERID
INNER JOIN TMPREFERENCE C
ON B.INTPREFERENCEID = C.INTPREFERENCEID
WHERE B.INTPREFERENCEID IN (6,7,2,3,12,10)
ORDER BY B.INTCUSTOMERID

END

IF I AM USING THIS PROC AS I/P TO ANOTHER PROC THEN IT GIVES NO PROBLEM AS I CAN USE ?

CREATE PROCEDURE PROC2
AS
BEGIN

CREATE TABLE #SAATHI(INTCUSTOMERID INT,CHREMAIL NVARCHAR(60),INTPREFERENCEID INT,CHRPREFERENCEDESC NVARCHAR(50))

INSERT INTO #SAATHI
EXEC PROC1


ST......1,
ST......2,


END.

BUT IF , I USE ANOTHER PROC SIMILAR TO THE FIRST ONE WHICH GIVES SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT RESULTS AND GIVES TWO SETS OF RESULTS,THEN WE HAVE A PROBLEM,HO TO SOLVE THIS :-


CREATE PROCEDURE MY_PROC
AS
BEGIN
SELECT A.INTCUSTOMERID,A.CHREMAIL,B.INTPREFERENCEID,C.CHR PREFERENCEDESC
FROM CUSTOMER A
INNER JOIN CUSTOMERPREFERENCE B
ON A.INTCUSTOMERID = B.INTCUSTOMERID
INNER JOIN TMPREFERENCE C
ON B.INTPREFERENCEID = C.INTPREFERENCEID
WHERE B.INTPREFERENCEID IN (23,12,10)
ORDER BY B.INTCUSTOMERID

END

SELECT A.INTCUSTOMERID,MAX(case when A.intpreferenceid = 23 then '1'
else '0' end) +
MAX(case when A.intpreferenceid = 12 then '1'
else '0' end) +
MAX(case when A.intpreferenceid = 10 then '1'
else '0' end) AS PREFER
FROM CUSTOMER
GROUP BY A.INTCUSTOMERID
ORDER BY A.INTCUSTOMERID
END

WHICH NOW GIVES ME TWO SETS OF DATA , BOTH REQUIRED THEN HOW TO USE ONE SET OF RESULTS AS I/P TO ANOTHER PROC AND OTHER SET OF RESULTS AS I/P TO YET ANOTHER PROC .



CREATE PROCEDURE PROC2
AS
BEGIN

CREATE TABLE #SAATHI(INTCUSTOMERID INT,CHREMAIL NVARCHAR(60),INTPREFERENCEID INT,CHRPREFERENCEDESC NVARCHAR(50))

INSERT INTO #SAATHI
EXEC MY_PROC


ST......1,
ST......2,

END.

BUT, HERE I WANT TO USE FIRST DATASET ONLY , HOW TO USE IT ?

THANKS.

View 4 Replies View Related

Searching In Tables

Dec 8, 2004

Hi All,


Just wanted to run this idea past u all before I have a go at it.

I have two tables A & B that are similar to the below


Table A
Name1 Name2 Name3
Tom Bill John
Gary Harry Eric


TableB
Name1 Name2 Name3
John Bill Tom
Tom Eric john
Leslie Philip Colin


What I wanted to do is see if the the records from tableA row 1 exist in tableB

As you can see they can appear in any order, partially or not at all.

What I propose to do is take tableA Name1 and see if it matches tableb row1 name 1 OR name 2 OR name 3 and if I find a match use a variable to assign the the value 1 (so I can then see if the match is full (score three) partial socre 1 and two or not at all (0)

Then I will need do the same for tableA row 2

Then goto row 2 of table a and start again.

Does this make sense? Are there beter ways of doing this.

I am using SQL server to do the searching....?

All comments appreciated and welcome.

rgs

Tonuy

View 4 Replies View Related

Searching Tables

Jun 3, 2008

This subject probably isn't correct, but I'm not sure how else to describe what I want to do.

I have two tables.
Table 1:
Act_Num.....Code
1...........33
2...........23
3...........22
4...........26
5...........20

Table 2:
Part_ID.....Act_Listings
1927..........33 14
5819..........23 26

What I need to do is identify records from Table 2 that do not have an Activity in the Act_Listing field contained in Table 1. So for Part_ID=1927, code 33 exists in Table 1, but code 14 doesn't, so that record should be selected.

View 15 Replies View Related

Searching In Large Tables........

Mar 7, 2007

Hi there,i am having some problem related to SQL server........ Actually i am having a table called ZipCodes that have around 80,000 rows... and the size of the table is around 100 MB...... and my table is now on web Server,.  now my problem is that when i fire some query that needs to go through whole of the table then it estimated time to execute the query comes to be 13 seconds and the corsor threshold is set to 7 seconds (and i can't change that)....... so the SQL server cancels the query to be fired........Now i need some Methodology/Technique through which i can search Large Tables with minimum calculations in minimum Time............(Any Ideas)....

View 3 Replies View Related

Searching In All Tables In A Database

Apr 7, 2005

Whats the easiest way to search for a keyword in all the tables present in the database.
Or searching in 5-6 tables.
Thanks,
AzamSharp

View 1 Replies View Related

Searching Multiple Tables

Jul 26, 2004

im in need of some help, im new at sql and am trying to seach multiple tables.

i am doing a football database with a table for each of the teams
and each table has the following
"First Name" "Last Name" "Age" "Date of Birth" etc

what i am trying to do is search for either the "first name" or "last name" in every table

if anyone can help me it would be apreciated

View 1 Replies View Related

Searching Multiple Tables

Nov 19, 2004

i have multiple tables that vary very little in name. what i mean by this is they are named tbleffort1, tbleffort2 etc. i need to search all the tables together. there is a large constantly changing number of tables, so i would prefer not to have to write them out one by one! any suggestions would be most appreciated!

View 4 Replies View Related

Stored Procs Are BAD!! BAD, I Tell You!!!

Feb 5, 2005

almost choked when i read the following recent post on The Daily WTF (http://thedailywtf.com/) the other day --

Logical Tiers? That Makes No Sense! (http://thedailywtf.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=28959)

i don't think i can do justice to how utterly stupid that stored procedure is

read the comments and have a laugh

one of the points made was that stored procedures are bad

this twigged something in my memory, so i dug around in my bookmarks, and sure enough, here's another decent discussion about stored procs --

Stored procedures are bad, m'kay? (http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma/archive/2003/11/18/38178.aspx)

enjoy!

View 6 Replies View Related

.exe From Stored Procs

Jun 28, 2007

Hey guys.

I am wondering if it is possible to execute an .exe from a stored proc. I have an application that calls a stored proc and I am wanting for that stored proc to call up an app to show certain results. I have no way of doing this on the application itself as I dont have the source code. So, since I do have access to the SQL I am wondering if it could be done there.

Thanks
tibor

View 14 Replies View Related

I Need Help With Stored Procs And UDF

Apr 8, 2004

First off, this is a cross post which is also located here:
http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=34073

Now, with the following stored procs and UDF, the Result is NULL and I cannot figure out why.

What I am doing is calling a stored procedure pass in an OUTPUT variable of type float. This stored proceudre then calls a different stored procedure passing the same OUTPUT variable of type float. The second stored procedure then calls a UDF passing in two variables to be multiplied ans this should set the OUTPUT variable to the result.

The UDF does return the correct result to the interior stored procedure, but the interior stored procedure does not pass the value back to the original stored procudure resultint in a Result value = NULL.

The code is below, just copy / past, execute and you will see exactly what I mean.

Any thoughts?


USE NORTHWIND
GO

CREATE FUNCTION RECTANGULAR_XSECTION
(@fWidth float, @fHeight float)

RETURNS float

AS
BEGIN
RETURN (@fWidth * @fHeight)
END
GO


CREATE PROCEDURE usp_shapes_GetRectangularXSection

@fResult float OUTPUT

AS

declare @fWidth float, @fHeight float
SELECT @fWidth = 108, @fHeight = 10

SELECT @fResult = [dbo].[RECTANGULAR_XSECTION](@fWidth, @fHeight)
SELECT @fResult AS CalledProcedureOkHere

GO

CREATE PROCEDURE usp_shapes_GetXSection

@fResult float OUTPUT

AS

EXECUTE usp_shapes_GetRectangularXSection @fResult
SELECT @fResult AS CallingProcedure_NULL?
GO

declare @fResult float
EXECUTE usp_shapes_GetXSection @fResult
SELECT @fResult as OutsideCallingProcedure_NULL?
GO

DROP FUNCTION RECTANGULAR_XSECTION
GO
DROP PROCEDURE usp_shapes_GetRectangularXSection
GO
DROP PROCEDURE usp_shapes_GetXSection
GO


Mike B

View 3 Replies View Related

New To Stored Procs

Nov 13, 2007

I am trying to improve my SQL and reduce the number of connections my website is making to the server.

Currently I have a stored procedure that gets all the games (and their details) for a single user which works fine which uses a WHERE userid = @userid which is an Int value.

I now need to create a new procedure which brings back the to all their "friends" (again by their userid). How is it best to do this? I originally tried to do a WHERE userID IN (@userid) but was unable to work out what variable type to use for @userid.

Is it best to do a single query in this way or is there a way to use the existing SP, loop through the collection of userids and join the result together into a single set to return? If an IN is the best route, what is the correct datatype for the variable?

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Stored Procs

Aug 8, 2006

can anyone help me out.... i need to compare a date that was retrieved from the database and the system date then it must be coded in the stored procs of the database.. help!!!!

View 10 Replies View Related

Transactions And Stored Procs

Mar 8, 2004

All,

I'm relatively new to stored procs (not to SQL or SQL Server) and I am trying to get transactions to work within a stored proc. Here is the code:


(
--define the parameters that are needed
@userID char(32),
@userName varchar(50),
@status char(10),
@type char(10),
@password varchar(50),
@firstName varchar(100),
@lastName varchar(100),
@email varchar(200),
@domain varchar(50),
@pwdExpiry int,
@badLogin int,
@lastLogin datetime,
@full varchar(8000),
@read varchar(8000),
@noaccess varchar(8000)
)
AS
BEGIN TRAN tmp1
--First, insert the user into the system
INSERT INTO ptsUsers(UserID, UserName, Status, Type, Password, FirstName, LastName, Email, DomainName, PasswordExpiry, BadLoginAttempts, LastLoginDate)
values(@userID, @userName, @status, @type, @password, @firstName, @lastName, @email, @domain, @pwdExpiry, @badLogin, @lastLogin);

--Now, we need to add the function access edges for the user
declare @arrayValue char(32)
declare @rightID char(32)
declare @sepPos int
while patindex('%,%',@full)<>0
BEGIN
select @sepPos = patindex('%,%' , @full)
select @arrayValue = left(@full, @sepPos - 1)
-- replace the value with an empty string
select @full = stuff(@full, 1, @sepPos, '')

--create and parse the new id
declare @strID char(32),@tmpStr varchar(40)
set @tmpStr = newid();
set @strID = REPLACE(@tmpStr,'-','')

--get the access right id for full control
select @rightID = (Select AccessRightID from ptsAccessRights where Name = 'Write')
if(@rightID IS NOT NULL)
--insert the records that are full access
INSERT INTO ptsFunctionAccessEdges(FunctionAccessEdgeID, FunctionID, AccessRightID, UserID)
VALUES(@strID, @arrayValue, @rightID, @userID)
else
RAISERROR(50100,15,1)
END
COMMIT TRAN tmp1
IF @@TRANCOUNT > 0
RAISERROR(50101,15,1)
ROLLBACK TRAN tmp1


The transaction does not rollback when any errors occur at all. Any advice/help?

View 3 Replies View Related

IF Statement In Stored Procs... Help!

Apr 12, 2004

Hi all!

I am not an expert in Stored Procs. I would like to build one for a product list that would return a default value without using output parameters, if possible. Ultimately, I wouldn't be opposed to it.

It currently looks like this:


CREATE PROCEDURE ProductsByVendorNo
(
@VendorNum nvarchar(24)
)
AS

SELECT
P.ProductID AS ProductID,
P.ProductShortName AS ProductName,
P.ProductDesc AS ProductDesc,
U.UnitDesc AS Unit,
P.VendorProductNumber AS VendorNumber,
V.VendorName AS VendorName,
P.Price AS Price,
P.ImageThumb AS ImageThumb

FROM
tblProducts AS P
INNER JOIN tblUnitCodes AS U ON P.UnitCode=U.UnitCode
INNER JOIN tblVendors AS V ON P.VendorID=V.VendorID

WHERE
V.VendorsVendorNo = @VendorNum
AND P.Inactive = 0

ORDER BY
ProductName,
VendorNumber



I would like for it to return a default, constant value for the URL in the ImageThumb field, if this one is empty. I could not find good documentation of how to use IF statements for this case, i.e. to alter the return of just one field.

Suggestions?

Any input is highly appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Mili Skikic

View 8 Replies View Related

Security On Stored Procs On Dev Db

Mar 25, 2002

I want to "deny" create, update,and delete access on the dbo stored procs that are in the database, but do not want take away dbo owner access. is this possible?

can i create a role and deny access on a particular table in msdb? or a system table in the user table. Thus preventing the developers on the box access to update any of the dbo owned sp's and have them create their own user-owned stored procs?

this is sql7, sp3, development box.

thanks,

View 1 Replies View Related

Using Stored Procs In A DTS Package

Apr 27, 2001

I am trying to set up a DTS package that selects data from one table on server A into another table on server B. I want to do a select statement that will do the following:

select store_name
from store (server A)
where date_created >= (select max(date_created) from store (server B)

I use EM 7.0 to manage all of my extracts, however, the data is moving from a Syabase (adaptive Server)onto another Syabase(adaptive server) machine.
Unfortunately, there is no functionality for a linked server connection.

I tried the following, (which doesn't error out), but is not displaying the source columns in the destination tab of the DTS package when setting up the transformations.

declare @maxdate datetime
exec serverB.dbo.sp_max_date_from_store @maxdate
select store_name
from store --(server A)
where date_created >= @store

Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
trevorb

View 1 Replies View Related

Not Normal Will Stored Procs Help

Jun 19, 2000

I will be taking over a database that has almost no pk's or relations(this is not my choice, but a vendors)
Management is looking at stored procs to improve performance, but I am wondering
if the db is in this state will there really be a gain. I am pushing for normalization
first, but if anybody has any ideas or opinions I would appreciate

View 2 Replies View Related

Stored Procs And Parameters

Sep 10, 2001

I have a stored proc that is run periodically which I execute with a DTS package. The problem is that I have to update a field for each record selected by this stored proc with a specific date. I need to prompt the operator for this date so I can use this value.

View 6 Replies View Related

Errors And Stored Procs

Jul 28, 2004

Ok, I've read somewhere(which I'm looking for again : ) that said that there are errors like DeadLock that kills the execution of a stored proc and there are other errors that do not necessarily kill the rest of the execution of the stored proc. Is that true? If so does anyone have any links I can read. What I'm seeing is a bad id in the foreign key and I think what is happening is that there was a unique constraint error on the first insert but the stored proc continued executing and used the bad id later on in the stored proc.

I do know I can use the @@error and will start using it but I need more proof to agree or not agree with my theory.

Thanks ahead of time for any information you can give me either way.

DMW

View 2 Replies View Related

Views And Stored Procs.

Aug 31, 2004

Is there any performance loss by setting up a view and creating a stored procedure to return a recordset from a view versus setting up the stored procedure to return the recordset from the tables directly?

What way should I do this?

Mike B

View 2 Replies View Related

Help - Updating Stored Procs !!

Nov 23, 2006

Hi all.

First post on here, so please excuse any ignorant parts of my question :)

We've recently had to migrate an application from one server to another, and had lots of problems getting it to work (NT4/SS7 -> 2K3/SS2K5). After much digging around I found the info on SQL server 2k5 changing the SUSER_NAME to SUSER_SNAME (I think from reading the change was actually from SQL Server 2000 - that correct ?).

Anyway I updated some of our stored procedures to correct that issue, and things *seem* to be working again (<-- famous last words, I know :eek: ), but I've been trying to find details of any other changes, particularly command changes, that I may need to make to our stored procedures.

To be honest I've found the info on Microsoft's main site and technet site next to useless - all seems to discuss very generic high-level procedures for database migration etc.. I didn't even find the SUSER change on there.

Could anyone point me to some useful information on other changes to look out for (within the SP's) ??

Thanks in advance for your help, and for taking the time to read this :beer:

View 2 Replies View Related

Encrypted Stored Procs

Sep 7, 2007

Hey yall

I ran into something interesting today and was wondering how one would do this. I have some 3rd party stored procs and one was kicking out a truncate error so I took it upon myself to investigate the stored proc that was kicking out this error. So when I tried viewing the sp, I received an error:*****Encrypted object is not transferable, and script could not be generated.***** and then it brings up a blank editing screen.

First I believe this was a custom error message as it just doesnt seem like the way SQL Server would have presented it.

So how would someone prohibit viewing of a stored proc like this?

Thanks

View 3 Replies View Related

Concurrent Stored Procs?

Mar 8, 2004

Hi all

I have a stored proc that runs every 4 hours - as a job. The stored proc takes about 3-5 minutes to comple, depending on number of records.
To do testing we run that stored proc manually, also.
Sometimes 2 or more people may run the same stored proc without knowing that the other person is running. This may create duplicates entries once processed.

What I want to know is, Is there a way to check if that stored procedure is currently running. If so it wont run second time concurrently.
(May be semapohres,mutex or something like that?)

(I am trying not to use a table to store whether the stored proc is running or not)


Thanks in advance.

Rochana

View 10 Replies View Related

ARITHABORT AND STORED PROCS

May 1, 2007

I wrote a stored procedure and set it as a schedule. it has no problem when I execute this SP in query analyzer. But it will show error when I execute it in schedule job.
I think the main reason is I have created a DDL trigger that will fire when DDL_DATABASE_LEVEL_EVENTS happens. Any solution?



SELECT failed because the following SET options have incorrect settings: 'ARITHABORT'. Verify that SET options are correct for use with indexed views and/or indexes on computed columns and/or query notifications and/or xml data type methods. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 1934). The step failed.

View 2 Replies View Related

Stored Procs Script

Jan 27, 2008

Can someone please point me in the right direction (guidance or url to a utility or article) as to how we can write a script to scan all of the stored procedures in our database for any reference to a field name were are about to change? Also, can we use such a script to do the actual change from the old field name to the new one?

Thanks!

View 3 Replies View Related

Question Regarding Stored Procs

Jul 23, 2005

Hello,It might be a basic question, but there it goes:I have a store procedure that first checks if the record exists and, ifit doesn't, inserts the new record.Is the scenario below possible?(thread1) USER1 -> check if record "abc" exists(thread2) USER2 -> check if record "abc" exists(thread1) USER1 -> "abc" doesn't exist(thread2) USER2 -> "abc" doesn't exist(thread1) USER1 -> add "abc" as new record(thread2) USER2 -> add "abc as new record (OPS, this is an error,because "abc" already exists, it was just inserted by USER1)I am wondering if this kind of concurrent, multi-threaded accesshappens with stored procedures.If yes, can I execute a procedure from start to finish without anyother simultaneous procedure interrupting?I appreciate any information about this.Leonardo.

View 4 Replies View Related

Stored Procs And Db_owner

Oct 31, 2005

I have some users that I need to run stored procedures, but they can'tseem to run them unless they are in the db_owner role of the database.How do I give them access to run the stored procs without giving themthe complete rights of the db_owner role?Thanks in advance.

View 1 Replies View Related

Compilation Of Stored Procs

Aug 10, 2006

Hi,

I would like to know if the execution plans of stored procs also get migrated when we do migration to 2005 from 2000 using attachdetach method or we will need to re-run the stored procs?

The thing is when I am running the Stored procs in 2005, its performing really slow in first run.

Any help in his regard is highly appreciated.

Thanks,
Ritesh









View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved