Seemingly Odd Ordering Of Results With/without TOP And/or Index

Aug 16, 2006

I've been trying to find out why a simple query containing a couple of top-level order bys produces different results when I introduce TOP into the query. I've found nothing so far, other than the results of both queries (TOP and non-TOP) are different again if I add an index.

All the DDL and DML is below, along with the results. The database uses the BIN2 collator.

I guess there's a simple explanation for this...




DROP table employeeCREATE TABLE employee( id INTEGER IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL, givenname NVARCHAR (20), familyname NVARCHAR (20), CONSTRAINT pk_employee_id PRIMARY KEY (id));insert into employee values('John', 'Smith');insert into employee values('John', 'SMITH');insert into employee values('John', 'Smyth');insert into employee values('John', 'SMYTH');goselect top 10 givenname, familynamefrom employee order by lower(familyname) asc, lower(givenname) ascgo-- Dropping top produces results in different order!select givenname, familynamefrom employee order by lower(familyname) asc, lower(givenname) ascgo-- Creating an index results in different order on both queries!CREATE INDEX idx_employee_names ON employee (familyname, givenname);goselect top 10 givenname, familynamefrom employee order by lower(familyname) asc, lower(givenname) ascgoselect givenname, familynamefrom employee order by lower(familyname) asc, lower(givenname) ascgo

This produces the following results:

givenname familyname
-------------------- --------------------
John SMITH
John Smith
John SMYTH
John Smyth

(4 rows affected)
givenname familyname
-------------------- --------------------
John Smith
John SMITH
John Smyth
John SMYTH

(4 rows affected)
givenname familyname
-------------------- --------------------
John Smith
John SMITH
John Smyth
John SMYTH

(4 rows affected)
givenname familyname
-------------------- --------------------
John SMITH
John Smith
John Smyth
John SMYTH

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Ordering Results

Jul 25, 2007

I am trying to do a simple SQL query..the result will be sorted alphabetically by default, but i need to specify say, if there is a "Others" it will be placed last in the list. Is there any way to write the query using ORDER BY?

e.g
Australia
China
Others
USA

and i want it to be:
Australia
CHina
USA
OThers

View 1 Replies View Related

Ordering Results By Number Of Conditions Met

Jul 20, 2004

I have a query that pulls records from a table based on whether is matches one or more of several criteria. I'd like to be able to order the results of this query by the number of conditions a particular row met. So a row that met 3 conditions would rank about a row that only met 2. So far I haven't been able to dent this with any attempt so I'm open to any suggestions.

View 5 Replies View Related

Ordering Results By Order Of The IN' Clause

Jul 28, 2006

Consider this SQL:SELECT my_field FROM my_table WHERE my_field IN ('value2', 'value1','value3')Simple enough, but is there anyway to specify that the result should beordered exactly like the "IN" clause states? So when this recordsetcomes back, I want it like this:my_field------------value2value1value3Possible?Deane

View 5 Replies View Related

Seemingly Simple Process But

May 12, 2006

Using an SQLDataSource control to populate a two column table...
I have not found a simple solid means of looking at the table to determine if a record exists and if it isn't there insert it.  I've tried talking directly to the DataSource control and using dependent controls such as formview or gridviews.  Anyone have a simple solid method to do this?  I have a hunch I'm missing the obvious here.
Next, we (our dev team) is seeing an issue when switching modes of formview from Item, to Edit, Insert, etc. That the values of the TextBoxes and Labels become null.  I'm guessing it is a cache issue but we need to get around it.  Has anyone seen this sort of behavior and what did you do to correct/work around it?
Thanks,

View 1 Replies View Related

Peculiar Problem With Seemingly Identical Data

Jul 20, 2005

Hello,I have this peculiar problem concerning MS SQL Server.My company works with an mailing application (ASP) which uses SQLServer as it's repository. What I want to do is send data directlyfrom my own application to this SQL Server in order to feed themailing application.To test if this was possible I linked the tables from SQL Server in MSAccess and entered the data. This worked fine and the data was pickedup correctly by the mailing application.The problem occurs when I send the data from my application (Javaapplication with JDBC connection). The data is in this case no longerpicked up by the application. The strange thing is that the data whichis entered through Access and the data from the Application lookidentical in de database view. The problem also occurs when the datais send with the tool winSQL and when I view the data in here it stilllooks identical.Even more strange is when I select the record which is not working inAccess and copy it into a new record (only changing the key) itsuddenly works!Has anyone have an idea how this can be?Thanks in advance,Sander Janssen.

View 3 Replies View Related

Fuzzy Grouping Seemingly Corrupting Data

Jan 10, 2007

I've seen one other post on this topic from October 2005 and I thought I'd bring it up again. I've a Fuzzy Grouping component in my data flow. The output data from it appears to be the result of records spliced into other records. This includes pass-through columns, not merely "clean" or similarity columns. For example (I've added the suffixes for illustrative purposes):

AddressLine1_in: 162 OAKMONT
AddressLine1_out: 162 OAKMONTLAMINATION INC

CityStateZip_in: Alexander, AR 72002-8539
CityStateZip_out: Alexander, AR 72002-8539116-7066

These are just pass-through columns, although "used" columns are seeing something similar (below.) Any others with this experience?

City_in: Alexander
City_out: Alexandertle Rock

View 1 Replies View Related

Inconsistant Query Results With Count(*)... Bad Index?

Jul 20, 2005

I have a table that seems to have a bad index. When I do the followingquery I get inconsistant and needless to say incorrect results.select count(*) from mytable where mycolumn = 1If I remove the index from "mycolumn" the query works correctly. If Iadd the index back (even with a new name etc...) it doesn't workright.Has anyone ran into this? or does anyone know how I can fix thisproblem?It seems that removing the index is not really removing everythingbecause when I add a new one I get this same problem... btw, this isisolated to this column on this table. all other indexes within thedatabase are fine.Any help would be appreciated.Thanks,dharper

View 1 Replies View Related

Reorganizing/Rebuilding Index Results In More Fragmentation?

Dec 11, 2007

I have been reworking my index maintenance jobs from my old SQL 2000 table and view references to the DMV's and System Tables in SQL 2005, and I noted that some of my indexes end up being more fragmented after a reorganization and or rebuild. That doesn't make much sense to me at all. The code I am executing is:




Code Block
print ' '
print '************* Beginning Index Updates for '+db_name()+' *************'
print ' '

DECLARE @tablename varchar(250),


@indexname varchar(250),
@fragpcnt decimal(18,1),
@indexid int,
@dbID int

-- Determine DB ID
SELECT @dbID = DB_ID()

DECLARE tnames_cursor CURSOR FOR

SELECT b.name, c.name, a.avg_fragmentation_in_percent, a.index_id
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (@dbID, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) a

JOIN sys.indexes b ON a.object_id = b.object_id



AND a.index_id = b.index_id
JOIN Sys.objects c ON b.object_id = c.object_id
WHERE a.index_id > 0
ORDER by a.page_count DESC

OPEN tnames_cursor
FETCH NEXT FROM tnames_cursor INTO @indexname, @tablename, @fragpcnt, @indexid
WHILE (@@fetch_status = 0)

BEGIN

-- Declare and determine the tablename ID
declare @tablenameID int
select @tablenameID = object_id(@tablename)



IF @fragpcnt > 30

BEGIN

EXEC('ALTER INDEX ['+@indexname+'] ON ['+@tablename+'] REBUILD')
PRINT '***************************************************'
PRINT 'Index '+@indexname+' was rebuilt.'
PRINT 'Original framentation Percent: ' + convert(varchar, @fragpcnt) + '%'


SELECT @fragpcnt = avg_fragmentation_in_percent
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (@dbID, @tablenameID, @indexid, NULL, NULL) a

JOIN sys.indexes b ON a.object_id = b.object_id



AND a.index_id = b.index_id
JOIN Sys.objects c ON b.object_id = c.object_id

PRINT 'Post Rebuild fragmentation Percent: ' + convert(varchar, @fragpcnt) + '%'
PRINT ''
END
ELSE IF @fragpcnt BETWEEN 5 AND 30

BEGIN

EXEC('ALTER INDEX ['+@indexname+'] ON ['+@tablename+'] REORGANIZE')
PRINT '***************************************************'
PRINT 'Index '+@indexname+' was Reorganized.'
PRINT 'Original framentation Percent: ' + convert(varchar, @fragpcnt) + '%'

SELECT @fragpcnt = avg_fragmentation_in_percent
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (@dbID, @tablenameID, @indexid, NULL, NULL) a

JOIN sys.indexes b ON a.object_id = b.object_id



AND a.index_id = b.index_id
JOIN Sys.objects c ON b.object_id = c.object_id

PRINT 'Post Reorganization fragmentation Percent: ' + convert(varchar, @fragpcnt) + '%'
PRINT ''
END
ELSE

BEGIN

PRINT '***************************************************'
PRINT 'Index '+@indexname+' was left alone.'
PRINT 'Original framentation Percent: ' + convert(varchar, @fragpcnt) + '%'
PRINT ''
END
FETCH NEXT FROM tnames_cursor INTO @indexname, @tablename, @fragpcnt, @indexid
END
print ' '
print '************* NO MORE TABLES TO INDEX *************'
PRINT 'All indexes for the '+db_name()+' database have been updated.'
print ' '
DEALLOCATE tnames_cursor





Below are some snipits of the output:


***************************************************
Index _dta_index_wuci_history_8_1123587141__K2_K5 was rebuilt.
Original framentation Percent: 58.3%
Post Rebuild fragmentation Percent: 58.3%

***************************************************
Index PK__batchjob__776C5C84 was left alone.
Original framentation Percent: 0.0%

***************************************************
Index PK__ContactWebDetail__116A8EFB was rebuilt.
Original framentation Percent: 44.4%
Post Rebuild fragmentation Percent: 77.8%

***************************************************
Index PK__managed_object_s__5DCAEF64 was left alone.
Original framentation Percent: 0.0%

***************************************************
Index kb_IX_kb_scope_scope_role was rebuilt.
Original framentation Percent: 75.0%
Post Rebuild fragmentation Percent: 87.5%

***************************************************
Index PK__query__09A971A2 was left alone.
Original framentation Percent: 0.0%

***************************************************
Index PK__email_message__38996AB5 was rebuilt.
Original framentation Percent: 85.7%
Post Rebuild fragmentation Percent: 0.0%

***************************************************






If the index begins with PK, then it is the primary key index which is generally the clustered index on the table, but not always. If it has an IX on it, it is generally a non-clustered index on the table, but again not always. In the case of the above, the PK is a clustered index, and the IX is a non-clustered index.

Anyone have any ideas why this is functioning in this manner?

Thanks,

Jon

View 6 Replies View Related

Upon Restarting User Defined Function Took Seemingly Forever To Run

Oct 16, 2006

Upon restarting user defined function took seemingly forever to run
 
I am learning about nested while loops being used in some interdependent user defined functions. They seemed to work OK for a while.
 
Later, remembering how I lost the database due to hard disk reformatting, I backed up the database and copied it to a rewritable CD.
 
As the data is not really significant I deleted the database and practiced restoring the database from the CD.
 
This morning I restarted the user defined function and ran it. After more than half an hour with no result I gave up. Normally it took much less time to run such a user defined function.
 
I re-ran some other UDF and they worked. However, after I made some minor amendments to the TSQL scripts, saved the UDF and re-ran it, and it again seemed to take forever to run, even when I had set the counter in to while loop to 2.
 
I don€™t know what had gone wrong.
 
I went to register my copy of SQL 2005 EXPRESS. It didn€™t seem to help.
 
Suggestion and advice are much appreciated.
 
 
 

View 3 Replies View Related

What Does The (seemingly Undocumented) FileNameRetrieval Property Of ForEachLoop Container Do?

Oct 4, 2007

Just wondering.

View 1 Replies View Related

Full-text Index Search Not Returning Expected Results

Apr 11, 2007

Hello,

My full-text search isn't working at all! I have a temporary table with full-text indexing enabled where files are scanned for social security numbers. If it has one, the user will see a message that it believes it's found a SSN and won't upload it. There is only ever one row in this table, as we overwrite the contents upon each upload.

I'm testing this search, and it doesn't work. The table has the following columns:
attachemtId (int) - primary key
fileContent (image) - contents of the file
fileExtension (varchar) - extension of the file (this is always either ".pdf" or ".doc")


I created a .doc file that simply says "ssn", and then run the following query:

SELECT * FROM TempAttachment
WHERE CONTAINS(fileContent,'ssn')


and nothing is returned! I tried the same thing with a .pdf file, and same results.

I'm not sure if this is related, but earlier I had this issue where I had to reset permissions for the directory. I've tried removing the full-text index and adding it again, but that didn't do anything. I also checked error logs on the server, and there were no messages. Any help would be appreciated! Thank you!

View 1 Replies View Related

FullText Search Not Returning Results After Rebuilding Full Text Index

Aug 6, 2012

We have a table that is Full Text Search index enabled on one column.This table has 200 lakhs of rows(20000000) . ContainsTable() function is searching data with in these 200 lakhs of rows(20000000), if any new rows are inserted then the ContainsTable is not going to search in these recent inserted rows.

We observed when we try for a data to search. it is returning the rows till the rows that are inserted date is less than 30th of march 2012. but not searching in the records that are created after April month , if even the data we are searching is available .

TableFulltextItemCount is around 2.2 crores.

Then we done rebuilt the FT catalog Index. then the TableFulltextItemCount became 0.Again we run the containstable query ,but still it is not getting results.

As the no of rows are very more . so i am not able to show the actual rows from which the data is not coming.

the below query gives 2 results that are from actual base table

HTML Code:
select * from g_case_action_log where cas_details like '%235355%' and product_id = 38810

To search for the same above word using FTS,I have used the query as below

HTML Code:
SELECT Distinct top 50 cal.case_id,cal.cas_details From g_case_action_log cal (READUNCOMMITTED)inner join containstable(es.g_case_action_log, cas_details, ' ("235355" OR "<br>235355" OR "235355<br> ") ') as key_tbl on cal.log_id = key_tbl.[key] Where cal.product_id = 38810 ORDER By cal.case_id DESC

I have attached one sql script file for your ref that contains create logic and index schema properties

Why it is not returning results all the time.

View 1 Replies View Related

Difference Between Index Seek &&amp; Index Scan &&amp; Index Lookup Operations?

Oct 20, 2006

please explain the differences btween this logical & phisicall operations that we can see therir graphical icons in execution plan tab in Management Studio

thank you in advance

View 3 Replies View Related

Ordering

Mar 3, 1999

Hi there!

We are experiencing a problem using order clause in the statement below:

SELECT
person.pkey
, first_name
FROM
person
, private_person
WHERE
fkey_person = person.pkey
AND first_name = 'A'
ORDER BY
first_name
, person.pkey

Where person table contains the following columns:

pkey, name etc

and private_person

pkey, fkey_person (indexed), first_name (indexed)

The output is:

STEP 1
The type of query is SELECT
FROM TABLE
private_person
Nested iteration
Index : i$private_person$first_name
FROM TABLE
person
Nested iteration
Using Clustered Index
pkey first_name
----------- ---------------------
2000512 A
10994 A
2299 A
1097 A
1218 A
5133 A
1329 A
1387 A
1465 A
7532 A
5513 A
1884 A
512 A
591 A

(14 row(s) affected)

STEP 1
The type of query is SETOFF

Why SQL server does not order by pkey? Is there any information about it somewhere? Is it a bug or what?

If we are ordering by fkey_person everything is Ok. Can anybody help?

Thanks a lot!

Kind Regards,
Vladimir

View 4 Replies View Related

Ordering Ids

Jun 18, 2007

I have a table named as C1_Messages with fields Id, Messages, Dates.
My Id filed looks like this:
1000
1001
1008
1009
1084
1093
1098 etc.

But here I need to make these Ids in a order, means it sould be in a consecutive order. Like
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005 etc.

So is there anyway to do this method in SQL?

Regards
Shaji

View 5 Replies View Related

Ordering In The Table

Jun 27, 2006

Hello,
 
I have made sql table called costreallocation consists of two columsn:
RuleID varchar(10)
Type varchar(20)
I run the following three queries:
insert into costreallocation(RuleId,Type)values('aa','a')
insert into costreallocation(RuleId,Type)values('dd','d')
insert into costreallocation(RuleId,Type)values('cc','a')
then when i notice that these three records are not inserted as they are run:
In the table thn there are three records :
aa      a
cc      d
dd      d
but i need to be filled in the table as they run as:
aa      a
dd      d
cc      d
 
your help is highly appreciated
Best regards
 

View 2 Replies View Related

Ordering Dilemma

Jan 26, 2007

I have an int field - that will hold number for an ordering system. It's a databound field to a textbox in a grid, I want the default to be empty, however not all fields are required so i may have 1-6 as bound values, and the rest should fall in line behind them - the only thing i can think of to do is default the values to 9999 so they come after 1,2,3,4,5,6 etc... I don't like seeing 9999 in my bound fields.
thanks for any suggestions you may have.
 Jeff

View 1 Replies View Related

Advanced Ordering

Mar 5, 2001

Hello.
I want to order a resultset from a table by two columns in another table. Here's how it looks:

[Books]
ID
Title


[linkBookAuthor]
BookID (Books.ID)
AuthorID (Authors.ID)

[Authors]
ID
Firstname
Lastname
AuthorOrder

As you can see it's a many to many relationship. Is there a way to order the books by Authors.Lastname (the first if there are several authors) with one query ? If not, what is the fastest way ? I don't need the names in the resultset so I only want to order the books by Authors.Lastname, not include Authors.Lastname.

Thanks for any help.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ordering By @parameter Possible?

Mar 20, 2001

Hiya!
I've got a little stored procedure:
CREATE PROCEDURE rICDCode @param1 char(15) = 'Description'
AS
SELECT DiagCode, ICD9ID, Description
FROM ICDCodes
ORDER BY @param1
and SQL is returning error 1008 - "The SELECT item identified by the ORDER BY number %d contains a variable as part of the expression identifying a column position. Variables are only allowed when ordering by an expression referencing a column name."
I want to be able to use the same stored procedure for several different functions which all need the same rowset sorted differently. Any way to do this?

Thanks,
Sarah

View 2 Replies View Related

Custom Ordering Top 20 ?

Jul 11, 2005

Hi guys.

I want to create a top 20 product list from a few thousand products. I want the rest of the products to be grouped into 'others'...

I also want the products to be ordered by the facts in the cube. Thus the product dimension would dynamically change depending on the Time dimension thats being selected.

is this plausible ?

Thanks
Tom

View 1 Replies View Related

Ordering By One Field Or Another

May 16, 2008

Is it possible without using CASE statements, to order a result set by one field (if the second field return value is null) or another (if the second field return value is not null)

This would be on datetime fields.
Let's say I have 5 records with 2 date fields
sched_dt and arriv_dt.

sched_dt will always have a value, arriv_dt may or may not have a value.

In a single result set I would like to have the records with an arriv_dt sorted by arriv_dt and the ones without an arriv_dt sorted by sched_dt.

*Hope that makes sense*

Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Ordering Dates

Apr 7, 2005

I have a table that has 4 dates for each record (birthday, anniversary, policy_start & policy_end). What I want to do is cycle through each record and then do some calculations using the gaps between the dates. So it
might be Calc1 using (birthday->anniversary), Calc2(anniverary->policy_start), Calc3(policy_start->policy_end), etc. BUT the dates might be in different orders (ie the birthday could come first - or the anniverary could, etc).

In VBA in Excel, I can use the SMALL function within my calcs and this returns the minimum date, the next smallest, the next & then the biggest. But how can I do this in SQL. I guess I can push the 4 dates out to a temp table, order it and then suck them back in - but I have no idea how to do this for all the records in my primary table

I've also tried using various WHERE statements (ie do Calc1 using Birthday & Anniversary WHERE Birthday < Anniversary and ........ - but the code gets awfully long.

Is it possible to write my own SMALL function which uses a bubble sort on the 4 dates & then returns the smallest, next smallest, etc

Any thoughts ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Re-ordering Records

Jul 5, 2007

Hi all,

Ive got a table with a field called 'morder' which orders a menu based on the values in this field (1 for position 1, 2 for position 2 etc...) for example

1 - menu item 1
2 - menu item 2
3 - menu item 3
4 - menu item 4

If I want to add a record to this table and put it at number 2 in the list, i need to update the table to then read...

1 - menu item 1
2 - NEW menu item 2
3 - menu item 2
4 - menu item 3
5 - menu item 4

I want to use a mssql or php function to re-order this field... is it possible??

Hope you can help, and hope it makes sense...

Ash

View 2 Replies View Related

Specific Ordering

Jul 12, 2004

Hi, I was wondering, I have several columns of data that are able to be sorted on - the user just clicks on the column name. However, we have 1 column called order status where we don't want the order to be alphabetical (and it is a text field - a couple current possible values are Processing...In Production...Waiting For Approval). This order is not good for logical sorting - we would want to be able to specify what value would get order. Does that make sense? So we would want to be able to say that Processing is first in the display, Waiting For Approval would be next, then In Production would be next, and so on. Is there any possible way of doing this in a SQL query? Or am I going to have to manually modify all the data adding numbers to the beginning of each data so that it will sort on the numbers? Thanks everyone.

View 4 Replies View Related

About Ordering Of Columns

Jan 2, 2007

i add new column using alter command but i always found it in the end of table but
i want to add it in particular position between the columns...........

how to do so .............:)

View 6 Replies View Related

Ordering By Date

Jun 7, 2007

Hi,I'm streaming data monitoring histories of components into a database table with the following three columns: Hour (DateTime), Id (Int64), and Value (Int32). The Value entry is an aggregate of all values sent from component Id during, and 59 minutes and 59 seconds after, the time listed in the Hour column.I had rather not have to sort the queries after pulling them from the database by date. So I tried to index the DB by the Hour column. Any column will inevitably have duplicates, since the uniqueness depends on a combination of Hour and PortId. But Indexing the Hour column doesn't result in INSERTs being in order as I had expected. Instead, every entry is listed in order of insertion.So. . .how can I keep such a table ordered by date on the disk? I'm afraid this will become very inefficient if this isn't nipped in the bud right now.Thanks so much for your help!-Brandon

View 4 Replies View Related

Ordering Days

May 19, 2004

I have a little query that returns me all the days in a month, but the days are not in the order I need. They come out like so..

January 10
January 11
January 12
January 13
January 14
etc
January 19
January 2
January 20
January 21
January 22

here is my sample code

select [month] + ' ' + [day] as [Date] from mytable
where [month] = 'january'
and [year] = '2004'

Thanks, Jeff

View 10 Replies View Related

Ordering By Months

Jun 9, 2004

I am wondering if someone maybe able to help me, I am needing to order my data via months in the calendar sense not alphabetically, below is what I currently have, but it only does it alphabetically.

select to_char(created,'yyyy-Mon'), matdesc, count(*)
from test
group by to_char(created,'yyyy-Mon'), matdesc
order by to_char(created,'yyyy-Mon') desc

any help would be greatly appreciated

Thank you

Stephen

View 11 Replies View Related

Ordering Within Hierarchy

Aug 7, 2007

Hi all,

Ive got a bit of a problem,

I have two tables:

CATEGORY
id
name
parent_CATEGORY_id

RECORD
id
CATEGORY_id
Stock_Held_Number

ps. Ive stripped out any non relevant fields


I also have the following query (again ive stripped out the non-relevant fields)

SELECT TOP (100) PERCENT SUM(dbo.RECORD.Stock_Held_Number) AS TotalStock, CATEGORY.Name AS FundName
FROM CATEGORY
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.RECORD ON CATEGORY.ID = dbo.RECORD.CATEGORY_id
GROUP BY CATEGORY.Name, RECORD.Stock_Held_Number

At the moment its grouping all the CATEGORIES and giving me a sum total for each which is great.

The problem I have is the CATEGORY table, there is an optional join to parent CATEGORY records on the table.

What Im trying to do is to provide a fully ordered result within the CATEGORIES and I don't have a clue.

For example:

The CATEGORY table has the following values
ID Name Parent_Category_id
1 Pens
2 Animals
3 Rocks
4 Horses 2
5 Dogs 2

When I currently run the query I get:
Name TotalStock
Pens 20
Animals 30
Rocks 40
Horses 50
Dogs 60

It's technically correct because I don't want the parent to calculate the total value of the children

What Im really trying to do is order them within the hierarchy though and indent (if possible) the result so I would get

Name TotalStock
Animals 30
---Dogs 60
---Horses 50
Pens 20
Rocks 40

Does anybody have any pointers as to how I can achieve this.

Many thanks

Mike

View 3 Replies View Related

Ordering Rows

Feb 18, 2008

hi,

i have following data:

create table tb_customer (customer_id int, order_id varchar (12))
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (123, 2201)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (123, 2246)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (123, 2236)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (123, 1253)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (120, 1201)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (127, 2251)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (127, 2231)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (122, 2121)

and i want to get the following output:

output:
Nu_order | customer_id| order_id
1 |123| 2201
2 |123| 2246
3 |123| 2236
4 |123| 1253
1 |120| 1201
1 |127| 2251
2 |127| 2231
1 |122| 2121

any idea?

thank you

View 11 Replies View Related

Ordering, Grouping - HELP!

Jul 23, 2005

Having recently had excellent service here (many thanks, Erland!),here's another wee problem.SQL 2000I need to get a report which will display the movement of people thus:ID DIRECTION NAME DATE VEHICLE REGISTRATIONThe value of DIRECTION can be either "Inbound" or "Outbound"I need to have the data grouped by ID, with the "Outbound" row first.For example1 "Outbound" Smith 10/02/2005 ABC1231 "Inbound" Smith 11/02/2005 ABC1235 "Outbound" Jones 14/02/2005 XYZ7895 "Inbound" Jones 15/02/2005 DEF456This is the SQL so far.SELECTfldPersonID,tblMovementType.fldType AS [MovementType],'Outbound' AS [Direction],fldMovementDate AS [Date],CASE WHEN tblPerson.fldForenames IS NULLTHEN fldSurnameELSE fldSurname + ', ' + fldForenames END AS [Name],'Outbound ' + fldVehicleOut AS VehicleRegistrationFROMtblPersonINNER JOIN tblMovementTypeON tblMovementType.fldMovementTypeID = tblPerson.fldMovementTypeWHERE((fldMovementDate BETWEEN @FromDate AND @ToDate) AND(fldStatus = 1))UNION ALLSELECTfldPersonID,tblMovementType.fldType AS [MovementType],'Inbound' AS [Direction],fldMovementDate AS [Date],CASE WHEN tblPerson.fldForenames IS NULLTHEN fldSurnameELSE fldSurname + ', ' + fldForenames END AS [Name],'Inbound '+ fldVehicleRtn AS VehicleRegistrationFROMtblPersonINNER JOIN tblMovementTypeON tblMovementType.fldMovementTypeID = tblPerson.fldMovementTypeWHERE((fldMovementDate BETWEEN @FromDate AND @ToDate) AND(fldStatus = 1))What I need is the way to Order or Group it so that I can just put therows into a report without any grouping on the report itself (CrystalReports aarrggh!) - if this is possible!Edward--The reading group's reading group:http://www.bookgroup.org.ukThanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Ordering Problem

Jul 23, 2005

Hi everyone, I have a database (not designed by me) in sql server, I amhaving trouble ordering it correctly, and I would appreciate any help.Here is my structure, it's sort of hierarchical:TABLE_AID_COLSUB_ID_COLTABLE_BID_COL'NAMEThis could be thought of as an employee and supervisor structure. Wehave employees (TABLE_B) and their relationship (TABLE_A).I know I need to use a group and oder by, but I am drawing blankstoday. I need the result to be (if using the employee example):Bob-Ryan-SueMarkNick-George-Paul--Ringo--StarHere is my half-hearted stab at it:SELECT *FROM TABLE_A AINNER JOIN TABLE_B BGROUP BY A.SUB_ID_COLORDER BY NAME;Thank you very much for any help you can offer.Have a great night!Ryan

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved