Transact SQL :: Paging Of Records Which Are Keep Updating
May 7, 2015
I would like to use the following code for querying summary records with paging.
DECLARE @PageNumber AS INT, @RowspPage AS INT
SET @PageNumber = 1
SET @RowspPage = 10
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY create_date) AS NUMBER,
* FROM summary
) AS TBL
WHERE NUMBER BETWEEN ((@PageNumber - 1) * @RowspPage + 1) AND (@PageNumber * @RowspPage)
ORDER BY create_date
Paging is implemented for fast response since the data pool is very large up to 10000000.
The above query works fine in testing. However, in reality, since new records are keep inserting to the tables, I have concern about the accuracy of viewing another page of result.
E.g. Â At 12:00pm, the result of page 1 (5 per page) Â is
R20, R19, R18, R17, R16
After 2 mins, 12:02pm, the user press next page button
Since records R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26 are inserted
page 2 result would be R21, R20, R19, R18, R17
So the result is showing many records same as page 1 which has already been seen. Could this situation be improved?
I am trying to update a large table which consists of 45 million records , it is taking more than 2 days to the update , below is my approach
1. The table has only one clustered index and no other indexes on the table. 2. I am updating in batches say 20000 record-wise. 3. Changed the recovery mode to bulk logged and auto-growth size is set to  300MB and there is enough space in my disk for transaction log .
I am using derived tables to Page data on the SQL Server side.I used this link as my mentor for doing paging on the SQLServerhttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms979197.aspxI wanted to use USER PAGING, thus I used the following code:CREATE PROCEDURE UserPaging(@currentPage int = 1, @pageSize int =1000)ASDECLARE @Out int, @rowsToRetrieve int, @SQLSTRING nvarchar(1000)SET @rowsToRetrieve = (@pageSize * @currentPage)SET NOCOUNT ONSET @SQLSTRING = N'selectCustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle from( SELECT TOP '+ CAST(@pageSize as varchar(10)) +'CustomerId,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle from( SELECT TOP ' + CAST(@rowsToRetrieve as varchar(10)) +'CustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle FROM( SELECT TOP ' + CAST(@rowsToRetrieve as varchar(10)) +'CustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle FROM Customers as T1ORDER BY contactname) AS T2 ORDER BY contactname DESC ) AS T3)As T4 ORDER BY contactname ASC'EXEC(@SQLSTRING)RETURNGOWhen I use this. Assume that the Total records returned by the SQLquery is 1198.Thus when I am on Page1 the above Stored Proc (SP) willreturn the first 1000 records.This works absolutely fine.Now I am on Page2, now I need to retrieve only the remaining 198records.But if I use the above SP, it will return the last 1000records.So to tweak this I used the following logic to set the@pagesize variable:Declare @PageCount intselect @PageCount = @TotalRows/@PageSizeif @currentPage @PageCount SET @PageSize = @TotalRows%@PageSizeSince I am on Page2 the above logic will set the PageSize to 198 andnot 1000.But when I use this logic, it takes forever for the SP toreturn the 198 records in a resultset.However if the TotalRows were = 1800, and thus the PageSize=800 orgreater, this SP returns the resultset quickly enough.Thus to get over this problem I had to use the other logic i.e. usingApplication Paging (i.e. first storing the entire result set into aTemp table, then retrieving only the required records for the PAGE)Can anyone suggest what is wrong with my user paging logic?????TIA...
You are right, I did not include the exact query since it has a wholeof joins and many where clauses in it.I did not want to make the post very hard to read, hence I simplifiedit.In the Stored proc I am using a String variable @SQLStringvarchar(2000) to hold the entire select statement, and then executingthat SQL using EXEC (@SQLString).Thus for debugging, I used Query Analyzer, and within the Analyzer I amusing the Select statement.So in my test I do not use any stored proc.so one select statement says:Select * from ( Select Top 600 * from( Select Top 2000 * from( Select Top 2000 PermitNumber, HouseNumber, OnStreetName,FromStreetName, ToStreetName, WorkStartDate as "WorkStart",tbl_Permittee.Permittee_name as PermitteeName, PermitteeNumber,PermitType_ID as "Type",InspectionDistrict,PermitStatus,IssueDate
I have a situation where deleting old records is blocking updating latest records on highly transactional table and getting timeout errors from application.
In details, I have one table called Tran_table1 in OLTP database. This Tran_table1 is highly transactional table, it will receive data for insert/update continuously
While archiving 2 years old records from Tran_table1 into Tran_table1_archive in batches(using DELETE OUTPUT INTO clause), if there is any UPDATEs on Tran_table1,these updates are getting blocked and result is timeout errors in application.
Is there any SQL Server hints to avoid blocking ..
I did use query plans to find out more. ( Please see the thread BELOW)I have a question on this, if someone can help me with that it will begreat.In my SQL query that selects data from table, I have a where clausewhich states :where PermitID like @WorkTypeorder by WorkStart DESC@WorkType is a input parameter to the Stored proc and its value is'01%'When I use the above where clause, all the Sorts in the ESTIMATED QueryExecution plan show me a COST of 28%.However if I change the query manually to say:where PermitID like '01%'order by WorkStart DESCThe COST of the Sort (in ESTIMATED Query Execution plan) reduces to 2%and at the beginning of the PLAN, there is a Bookmark Lookup whichincludes the above where clause.Whereas with the FIRST example , the BookMark Lookup in the beginningdoesn't show that where condition.Can anyone help me better understand this anomaly?TIA=====================================I am using derived tables to Page data on the SQL Server side.I used this link as my mentor for doing paging on the SQLServerhttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms979197.aspxI wanted to use USER PAGING, thus I used the following code:CREATE PROCEDURE UserPaging(@currentPage int = 1, @pageSize int =1000)ASDECLARE @Out int, @rowsToRetrieve int, @SQLSTRING nvarchar(1000)SET @rowsToRetrieve = (@pageSize * @currentPage)SET NOCOUNT ONSET @SQLSTRING = N'selectCustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle from( SELECT TOP '+ CAST(@pageSize as varchar(10)) +'CustomerId,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle from( SELECT TOP ' + CAST(@rowsToRetrieve as varchar(10)) +'CustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle FROM( SELECT TOP ' + CAST(@rowsToRetrieve as varchar(10)) +'CustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle FROM Customers as T1ORDER BY contactname) AS T2 ORDER BY contactname DESC ) AS T3)As T4 ORDER BY contactname ASC'EXEC(@SQLSTRING)RETURNGOWhen I use this. Assume that the Total records returned by the SQLquery is 1198.Thus when I am on Page1 the above Stored Proc (SP) willreturn the first 1000 records.This works absolutely fine.Now I am on Page2, now I need to retrieve only the remaining 198records.But if I use the above SP, it will return the last 1000records.So to tweak this I used the following logic to set the@pagesize variable:Declare @PageCount intselect @PageCount = @TotalRows/@PageSizeif @currentPage @PageCount SET @PageSize = @TotalRows%@PageSizeSince I am on Page2 the above logic will set the PageSize to 198 andnot 1000.But when I use this logic, it takes forever for the SP toreturn the 198 records in a resultset.However if the TotalRows were = 1800, and thus the PageSize=800 orgreater, this SP returns the resultset quickly enough.Thus to get over this problem I had to use the other logic i.e. usingApplication Paging (i.e. first storing the entire result set into aTemp table, then retrieving only the required records for the PAGE)Can anyone suggest what is wrong with my user paging logic?????TIA...
heres my problem, since I migrated to SQL-Server 2005, I was able to use the Row_Number() Over Method to make my Custom Paging Stored Procedure better. But theres onte thing that is still bothering me, and its the fact the Im still using and old and classic Count instruction to find my total of Rows, which slow down a little my Stored Procedure. What I want to know is: Is there a way to use something more efficiant to count theBig Total of Rows without using the Count instruction??? heres my stored procedure: SELECT RowNum, morerecords, Ad_Id FROM (Select ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Ad_Id) AS RowNum, morerecords = (Select Count(Ad_Id) From Ads) FROM Ads) as testWHERE RowNum Between 11 AND 20 The green part is the problem, the fields morerecords is the one Im using to count all my records, but its a waste of performance to use that in a custom paging method (since it will check every records, normally, theres a ton of condition with a lot of inner join, but I simplified things in my exemple)...I hope I was clear enough in my explication, and that someone will be able to help me. Thank for your time.
i have a total of 5 records to update. one being a summary row and the other four being 1,2,3,4 record ids. is there any way to update these 4 records w/o using 4 seperate updates???
First off, Ive been asking a lot of questions lately and I want to sincerely thank those who have been posting VERY helpful replies. I have learned much in these past few weeks.
That being said I have hopefully one of my last questions before this project is complete.
Im running a DTS that imports data from a flat text file and updates 6 different tables. In one of my tables, "PERSON", I only want the records to be inserted or updated if the FCN field is new, or unique.
Here is my code that updates the table (without regard for uniquneess):
INSERT INTO PERSON (FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME, MIDDLE_NAME, FCN) SELECT "FIRST", "LAST", "MIDDLE", FCN FROM DATAGRAB WHERE RECORD_DATE = convert(varchar(8), getdate()-1, 112)
How can I convert it to only update records with a unique FCN value?
Ive posted on here many times before and got the answers, so hopefully this time will be like the rest...you guys are SO good at SQL.
I have a database that has lots of fields. I use some specialised email marketing software that allows me contact each record. What I have done in the past is export the contacts i wanted to email and then format the columns like this: (all done in excel)
EmailAddress Website Salutation Website1 Website2 Website 3 info@eg.co.uk www.eg.co.uk David eg.co.uk Eg.Co.Uk Eg test@red.co.uk www.red.co.uk Sue red.co.uk Red.Co.Uk Sue
After each list looks like this, i then import this data into Access and from there our email software pics up the data and emails accordingly.
Now here comes the problem...
We have decided that we now want everything done within our sql database. Which means we want clickthroughs recording and open rates etc all appearing in our database. (we have all this sorted out)
However we dont have Website1, 2 or 3 fields in our database. We know that they need to be included in our db somewhere but with half a million contacts we don't want to do it one by one obviously.
We want a simple where we export all our contacts and then format them so they include website1, 2 and 3. THEN we want to import them, simply updating the contacts with that new data. (Or is there a SQL way of creating temp tables so these fields dont even need to be included in the db?)
I hope i managed to explain myself in way you can all understand.
I have an Excel file of 1362 rows and 30 columns. I need to load itinto my database to update addresses and phone numbers. Each recordhas its own ID number, which is defined in the Excel file and in thedatabase. The database is Millenium Version 7.2.1.1. I can't reallyfind any signifigance between any of the records. Is there a way I canjust load them into my database and update each record? Maybe by usingthe ID number?Dane WinklerDatabase SpecialistSt Vincent CollegeJoin Bytes!
I'm having a bit of problem putting together a query that will update records in one table from another table. I've got 2 tables lets call them tblA and tblB.In tblA there is EID(int), QID(int), OID(int) and in tblB OID(int) and QID(int). Also there is an input parameter @EID.What I want to have happen is when someone inputs @EID then tblB gets updated from tblA. To give you a heads up there are no PKs or FKs in either of the tables.If there is an OID in tblA it takes the QID from tblA and places it in tblB where OID from tblA and tblB match.Hopefully this makes sense I thought that I could do something like this:CREATE PROCEDURE test3(@EID int)AS UPDATE tblUsedSET QuestionID = (select QuestionID from tblExamQuestions where ExamID = @EID)WHERE OrderID = (select OrderID from tblExamQuestions where ExamID = @EID)GOBut I get an error that says that there are to many records being returned by the subqueries. Winston
I have a table with 5 columns (col1, col2, col3, col4). I want to do is: 1) To check if any two records are duplicates (if the the values in col1 of record A are identical to Record B, two records are considered as duplicates);
2) if two records are duplicate, I want to mark Record B as "Dup" in col4 ;
3) move the data of Col2 of Record B to col3 of Record A.
I have tried to use CURSOR for the job. I would appreciate if anyone can give me some hints for updating records using Cursor.
My script looks like this: CREATE PROC Mark_duplicate AS DECLARE @var1_a, /* To hold the data from Record A */ @var2_a, @var3_a, @var4_a, @var5_a,
@var1_b, /* To hold the data from Record B */ @var2_b, @var3_b, @var4_b, @var4_b,
/*** Create a CURSOR ***/ DECLARE Dup CURSOR FOR SELECT col1, col2, col3, col4 FROM TableA ORDER BY col1, col2 FOR UPDATE OF col1, col2, col3, col4
/**** OPEN the CURSOR ****/ OPEN Dup FETCH NEXT FROM Dup into @var1_a, @var2_a, @var3_a, @var4_a WHILE ( @@FETCH_STATUS =0 ) BEGIN FETCH NEXT FROM Dup into @var1_b, @var2_b, @var3_b, @var4_b WHILE ( @@FETCH_STATUS =0 ) BEGIN If ( @var1_a = var1_b ) THEN . .Updating statements . . ELSE SET @VAR1_a = @var1_b, @VAR2_a = @var2_b, @VAR3_a = @var3_b, @VAR4_a = @var4_b FETCH NEXT FROM Dup into @var1_b, @var2_b, @var3_b, var4_b END END CLOSE DUP . . .
I have a table that has 4+ million records. I need to update those records. I am facing some performance issue. Can someone please advice?
update stage set batch_status = 1 where update_status = 0
Update transaction Set aId = s.aId, b = s.b,
from stage s Where s.aId = transaction.aId and s.batch_status = 1
Update stage Set update_status = 1, batch_status = 2
where
batch_status = 1
When I run the above query with "set rowcount 1000", it runs in one minute. When I run the query for "set rowcount 10000", it runs in 1 hour 56 minutes. Can someone help me to optimize it?
Here's a problem that I can't find anyone else has run into. I'm usingAccess and SQL Server, but the theory would be the same for any db.I have a large number of tables that contain linked records(intersection tables mostly). In the interest of space, I'llillustrate an example:tblStudents (ID, Name)tblTeachers (ID, Name)tblClasses (ID, Name)tblEnroll (StudentID,ClassID,TeacherID)I have about 10 people who each use a separatecopy of this database (in access). I want them (at the end of eachday) to be ableto update all the records that they entered that day into a databasethat I have setup on a server (SQL Server 2005). Both databases havethe exact same structure.Caveat 1: All of the classes, students, and teachers are not the sameon each database, but the server database should contain all of them.Caveat 2: There is no way for the clients to automatically insert intothe server, they are offsite and out of range.Herein lies the problem: when a record is inserted into the server froma client, all of the links are lost since the ID will be different onthe server that it was on the client.I don't think a simple update / insert query will work, and most db'sand languages don't play nice with recordset appends.What are your thoughts??
I have a really simple query I'm trying to execute. I want to replace all instances of int X (8) in Column A (LastActivityID) with int Y (27) but the following SQL returns the said error. I understand the error, but not sure how to script the SQL differently to get the intended result. Thanks in advance.
Code Block
UPDATE Item SET LastActivityID = 27 WHERE LastActivityID = 8 Error: Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
I have a following problem: I€™m importing records from an Access table into a SQL Server Table. I€™m using lookup to determine if a record already exists in the SQL Server table and in that case I should update the record if it was modified.
I thought of using OLE DB Destination for new records (done, works fine) and OLE DB Command Transformation to update the modified records. It all works but the thing that bothers me is that my table has approx. 40 columns so my OLE DB Command is very long (update table set col1 = ?, col2 = ?, col3 = ? €¦€¦). The other problem is that I€™m always updating all the columns even if only one column was modified.
Is there a better way to update the existing records?
I want to use SSIS in order to synchronize data. The OLEDB and ADO.NET Destination Adapter just inserts the rows read from the source. Since I have PK Constraint on destination, the tranform fails. How can I ask to update the records in destination DB?
I wrote a sproc which does four things: 1. It looks at an option master to see if the record exists before inserting a new one 2. If the record is not there it inserts the optino record 3. Once the record is inserted I have to run a CASE statement on the record to determine its level 4. Once the level is determined, the record needs to be updated with the correct level. 1-3 work fine (when run without the update command). However, even though I set a criteria, UPDATE still updates and not the one records. Any idea why? set ANSI_NULLS ON set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO
IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM optionmaster WHERE BuilderID = @BuilderID AND OptionID = @OptionID AND CommunityID = @CommunityID AND PhaseID = @PhaseID AND PlanID = @PlanID AND ElevationID = @ElevationID)
BEGIN SELECT ' This option already exists in your Option Master' END ELSE BEGIN
--if the option record option does not exist, insert it
--once the option record is inserted, case it to find the its level (1-9) --update the record with the approciate level.
UPDATE Optionmaster SET optionlevel (
SELECT CASE WHEN CommunityID = '0' AND PhaseID = '0' AND PlanID = '0' AND ElevationID = '0' THEN '9' WHEN CommunityID = '0' AND PhaseID = '0' AND PlanID > '0' AND ElevationID = '0' THEN '8' WHEN CommunityID = '0' AND PhaseID = '0' AND PlanID > '0' AND ElevationID > '0' THEN '7' WHEN CommunityID > '0' AND PhaseID = '0' AND PlanID = '0' AND ElevationID = '0' THEN '6' WHEN CommunityID > '0' AND PhaseID = '0' AND PlanID > '0' AND ElevationID = '0' THEN '5' WHEN CommunityID > '0' AND PhaseID = '0' AND PlanID > '0' AND ElevationID > '0' THEN '4' WHEN CommunityID > '0' AND PhaseID > '0' AND PlanID = '0' AND ElevationID = '0' THEN '3' WHEN CommunityID > '0' AND PhaseID > '0' AND PlanID > '0' AND ElevationID = '0' THEN '2' WHEN CommunityID > '0' AND PhaseID > '0' AND PlanID > '0' AND ElevationID > '0' THEN '1' END AS OptionLevel --provides the option level required to update the record FROM optionmaster WHERE (BuilderID= @BuilderID And OptionID = @OptionID and CommunityID = @CommunityID AND PhaseID = @PhaseID AND PlanID = @PlanID AND ElevationID = @ElevationID)) --even through I specify the above criteria, it upates all records.
Hello, I am retriving records on a page, I am able to make changes cuase the data is displayed in textboxes, my question is how to save the changes I made in the database. Also in my below code for retriving the data what statement do I need to add so that I can use a QuerryString to filter the results. ex (default.aspx?CID=1) and only records that match that would display. Here is my code: for retriving data Private Sub displayrecord()SqlConnection1.Open() Dim SqlDataAdapter1 As New SqlDataAdapter("SELECT * FROM table1", SqlConnection1) Dim objReader As SqlDataReader Dim SqlCommand1 As New SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM table1", SqlConnection1) SqlDataAdapter1.Fill(dsMember) objReader = SqlCommand1.ExecuteReader() objReader.Read() txtbox_confirmpass.Text = objReader("MemberPassword") txtbox_name.Text = objReader("MemberName") txtbox_birthdate.Text = objReader("MemberDOB") txtbox_email.Text = objReader("MemberEmail") Dropdown_Gender.SelectedValue = objReader("Gender") objReader.Close() SqlConnection1.Close() End Sub Private Sub btnUpdate_Click
I'm trying to update every record with a incremental number. I wrote the following query but it updates the records with the same number. Could someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong? Thanks.
declare @NextKey int SELECT @NextKey = NEXT_KEY FROM TABLE_KEYS WHERE TABLE_NAME = "tblEmp" set @NextKey = @NextKey + 1
DECLARE tblNewEmp_cursor CURSOR FOR select emp_pk from tblNewEmp
open tblNewEmp_cursor FETCH NEXT FROM tblNewEmp_cursor WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0 begin update tblNewEmp set emp_pk = @NextKey set @NextKey = @NextKey + 1 FETCH NEXT FROM tblNewEmp_cursor end
TRUNCATE TABLE [Temp_Export]; INSERT INTO [Temp_Export] (
[Code]....
The issue I'm having is that I am getting more records in the VIEW than records updated. What can explain such a discrepancy? I am updating the records based on the PK/FK Temp_Import_ID column, which exists in both tables. where the view would yield more records than those matched by the update statement?
Dear all,I need to update one field in a table for a given record and visit number.Example below is how the table looks -SID VISIT DLCO101 0 12101 1 16102 0 18102 2 10103 1 12103 2 14Here is how I would like it to look. The changes are the starred items.SID VISIT DLCO101 0 14*101 1 16102 0 18102 2 16*103 1 12*103 2 14I know it is an UPDATE statement, but I am not sure how to use it when Ineed to update more than one record.Thanks for the help in advance.Jeff
I am seeing a strange behavior in a script component that I can't figure out.
Basically, there is a field in my script that checks to see if a string field is length of 1. If it is, it updates the field with some value. The strange behavior is that it picks up some of the rows but not others.
If Row.FieldValue.Length = 1 Then
Row.FieldValue= "Some Value"
End If
I've tried variations such as: If left(Row.FieldValue.,1) = "-" Then
SID statusid listindex listsize sent 1Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 12Â Â Â Â 25Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 25Â Â Â Â Â Â 1 2Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 12Â Â Â 25Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 50Â Â Â Â Â Â 0 3Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 12Â Â 75Â Â Â Â Â Â 150Â Â Â Â Â Â 1 4Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 14Â Â Â Â 25Â Â Â Â 25Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1
I have a table like above where cid is unique but status is not for all the status id i need put 1 as they sent out .but till now i used max listindex because they used to send files sequentially but now list index is random so how to update sent to 1 for all the status ids.
No error is thrown, but the update is not made?  Possibly due to the dreaded inline sql being used?  The data structure for these 2 servers is horrific (but that is a story in itself).  The current structure (which needs immediate change) is each employee all 10 of them, have their own database.  If the userid is  6 or higher they are on server2 if the userid is 5 or below they are on server1.  Then they each have their own table that stores the data.  (A story for another day, but def needs overhaul).  However, here is the sql -- what needs to be altered to work with the current data structure and still get the updates needed?  Or we can scratch the update statements entirely if we can get the correct counts needed.
How can I update only one row doing an update query? Â For example: Â update from table1 set category = 'C' where country = 'Brazil' Â One want to update only one row with country = 'brazil'
I currently have a table called stores. I've just added a uniqueidentifier column called store_guid to the stores table. The table currently has about 500 records in it and now i'm trying to set each store_guid = to a newid(). I've tried using UPDATE stores SET store_guid = newid() . however, that doesn't work because i think it's trying to set each record equal to the same guid using that approach. All i need to do is fill in my new column with new guids. any ideas?
I'm trying to update a checkbox from "False" to "True" within a single table for multiple records. I can update a single record using the script below. However, I'm having trouble applying additional Id's to the string.
(Works) - Update Name_Demo set KEY_CONTACT = 'true' where ID = 225249
(doesn't work) - Update Name_Demo set KEY_CONTACT = 'true' where ID = '225249, 210014, 216543'
It says query executes successfully but returned no rows.
This is a general question regarding the use of view and storedprocedures. I'm fairly new to databases and SQL.I've created a SQL database using an Access Data Project ("ADP") andI'm satified with the table structure. I've moved on to building somefront ends for our users.I'm running into situations where I want subreports to be built fromqueries [views or stored procedures-I don't know which to use so I usethe term query] that are dependent on the values in other controls.I've played with stored procedures and I've figured out how to sendcriteria to a stored procedure and then dynamically change the recordsource of a subreport.However, I'm running into cases where I can't add records to theresults of a stored procedure. The table I'm running a stored procedureon has five fields: (1) Primary Key for each record, (2) FundID that'sa primary key in another table, (3) CompanyID that's a primary key inanother table, (4) Attribute 1 of the (Fund/Company) and (5) Attribute2 of the (Fund/Company).The stored procedure filters the set of Fund/Companies based on aFundID from a form. I can update this stored procedure. However, forusers, they would like to see the Fund Name from the table that hasunique FundIDs. As soon as I include that into the stored procedure, Ican no longer add records.My questions are many:1. Is there a primer online that discusses the theory behind myquestion? Recordsets, updatability, working with recordsets in forms?2. What are some best practices for developing subreports, combo boxes,list boxes, etc. where the data is dependent on the values in a control3. I'm struggling with the best ways to grab objects on a form. If I'mon the main form I'm comfortable working with theMe.__object__.__sub-oject routine. However, if I'm in one subform whereI need another subform to change based on the record I'm in, I feelthat my code to get at the subform is very klunky..forms.main form name.sub form name.form.record sourceI don't even know how I figured out the "form" part before recordsource. Again, are there some basic rules or guides about navigatingthrough forms in VBA?4. Should I be developing front ends in some other environment?I know it's a lot, but all the advice from the newsgroups seems topresuppose some knowledge about how ADP, ADO, ODBC..blah blah and Ican't seem to find any documents about ADP and SQL.
Hi allI just ranUPDATE dbo.tbl_forecastedSET update_ref = 0but it only updated the first 10000 records. I'm wondering if anyone cantell me why this is, and can I get around it.I have looked on google and found a few references, but nothing in too muchdetailsthanks in advanceAndy
