Transaction (Process ID 66) Was Deadlocked On Lock Resources With Another Process.

Feb 14, 2007

Hi Folks,

I am having this table locking issue that I need to start paying attention to as its getting more frequent.

The problem is that the data in the tables is live finance data that needs to be changed and viewed almost real time so what I have picked up so far is that using 'table Hints' may not be a good idea.

I have a guy at work telling me that introducing a data access layer is the only way to solve this, I am not convinced but havnt enough knowledge to back my own feeling up. (asp system not .net).

Thanks in advance

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Transaction (Process ID 135) Was Deadlocked On Lock Resources With Another Process And Has Been Chosen As The Deadlock Victim.

Nov 14, 2007



Hi,

I was trying to extract data from the source server using OLEDB Source and SQL Server Destination when i encountered this error:

"Transaction (Process ID 135) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.".

What must be done so that even if the table being queried is locked, i wouldn't experience any deadlock?

cherriesh

View 4 Replies View Related

Transaction (Process ID 65) Was Deadlocked On Lock Resources With Another Process

Jan 6, 2012

We are facing deadlock issue in our web application. The below message is coming:

> Session ID: pwdagc55bdps0q45q0j4ux55
> Location: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> Error in: http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxxx/Manhatta...Bar=&Mode=Edit
> Notes:
> Parameters:
> __EVENTTARGET:
> __EVENTARGUMENT:

[code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Msg 1205 Transaction (Process ID 75) Was Deadlocked On Lock |

Oct 5, 2007

Hi:

On a production SQL2000 STD sp4 server,

1. I have dropped 10 tables with each around 1-2 gb in DB ABC
2. I had run DBCC ShrinkDatabase (ABC, 20) and it is failed after running 133 hours this morning. Yes, 133 hours.

It ran 72 hours last month and shrinked from 200 gb to 180 gb.
Thus, I expected it should be <= 72 hours to fnish since 10 more tables are dropped ?

Msg 1205 Transaction (Process ID 75) was deadlocked on lock | communication buffer resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.

DBCC shrinkDatabase will cause deadlocking? how to avoid it?
Is there other ways to speed up?

thanks
-D

View 1 Replies View Related

Transaction (Process ID 83) Was Deadlocked

Nov 10, 2006

Hi,
I got the following error when I try running my “comments.aspx� page with visual studio 2005Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Transaction (Process ID 83) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.
      fExecuteQuery(String commandText, String dataSetName) +90   fExecuteQuerySet(String commandText, String dataSetName) +36   ASP.comments_aspx.GetNarComment() +618   ASP.comments_aspx.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) +476   System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +67   System.Web.UI.BasePage.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +1013   System.Web.UI.PopupPage.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +4   System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +35
       System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain() +750
The segment code was the problem sits in file "comments.aspx"::
…
string cmdText=��;
        cmdText = string.Format(@"-- Get All Narative comments fo all students in the course from @selectedTermID down to its child terms
                    exec aagGetStudentSectionComments @companyID={0}, @sectionID={1}, @selectedTermID={2}, @StudentID={3}                                                                                                 
                    ", _companyID, sectionID, selectedTermID, studentID);
 
ds = fExecuteQuerySet(cmdText, "getMySet");
       
…
// the 2 functions to deal with ADO.NET to be called in above code segment
 
// return a dataset.
                   public DataSet fExecuteQuery(string commandText, string dataSetName)
                   {
                             DataSet mds = new DataSet();
                             SqlDataAdapter da = new SqlDataAdapter(commandText, _cn);
                             da.SelectCommand.CommandTimeout = 600; // 600 seconds
                             da.Fill(mds, dataSetName);
                             return mds; // return dataset
                   }
                   // Assume para commandText contains sql query which returns a table or more.
                   // return a DataSet.
                   public DataSet fExecuteQuerySet(string commandText, string dataSetName)
                   {
                             DataSet mds = new DataSet();
                             mds = fExecuteQuery(commandText, dataSetName);
                             return mds; // return DataSet
                   }
 
Please give me the reason why that dealock happens?Thanks in advance

View 2 Replies View Related

Transaction (Process ID 106) Was Deadlocked

Feb 27, 2006

ive seen this Deadlock Error message out on the internet being discussed, but no solution being offered.
i have a windows service that's running Select Statements [one at a time] - so unless there's some command in sql server that would re-run these - it could be a problem for me.
now if im running this select proc manually - of course i see the message and re-run the process, but how can this be accomplished programatically.
see msg below:

Transaction (Process ID 106) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.

thanks for any help on this
rik

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Server Transaction (process Id 69) Was Deadlocked

Nov 29, 2004

;)
Hello Everybody,
My name is Fabio and I post from Italy.
First, I don't know if this argument was already discussed in the past, but I'm new in this group so ...
Second I'm not so expert in DB due to the fact that I'm using SQL for the first time in my life ...

I use a store procedure to pass to every single user in my intranet (more than 150), details of different clients taken from an SQL table containing around 30.000 names.
Users have an ASP page displaying the information Selected in the DB.
This means that 150 users display info of 150 different clients.

To to this I use this code in store procedure:

CREATE PROCEDURE sp_assign_name
@iduser int
AS
if exists(select top 1 * from recallornotes where tmkoperator= @iduser)
update nominativitelecom set tmkmotrecall=convert(nvarchar(1), tmkstatus), tmkstatus=7 where id in (select top 1 id from recallornotes where tmkoperator=@iduser)
else
begin
if exists(select top 1 id from nonotes)
update nominativitelecom set tmkmotrecall=convert(nvarchar(1), tmkstatus), tmkstatus=7, tmkoperator =@iduser where id in (select top 1 id from nonotes with (UPDLOCK) order by NewID())
end
GO

This is working quite well when the number of users are more ore less around 50/60, when the number grows, on the IIS server (Pentium IV server, with Win 2000 in English, MS SQL 2000, and 1 Giga of ram), a file called DLLHOST.exe start to use the 100% of the CPU, and the users cannot display any other ASP page on their screens.
It is not a virus (some newsgroup report this problem connect to a worm virus, but we have latest antivirus files installed and spyware detect/delete on).
The SQL log reports this error:

"transaction (process id 69) was deadlocked on (lock) resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. rerun the transaction".

Is there a way to avoid the conflict that occur when different users are trying to select the same record in the DB ?
In other terms, which process will you use in the same situation to select one record per user ?

Thanks in advance for your precious help,
Fabio

View 1 Replies View Related

Transaction (Process ID 58) Was Deadlocked On Thread Error...

Jan 2, 2006

In an SSIS package I am continually getting the same error:

"Transaction (Process ID 58) was deadlocked on thread | communication buffer resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly.

The package is attempting to do a simple Execute SQL Task.  Since this seems like a database and not integration services issue, does anybody have any thoughts or insight into this error and where to begin troubleshooting?

Thanks,
Adrian

View 5 Replies View Related

Deadlocked On Lock Resources. SQL Server 2000

Jun 27, 2007

Hi, i am getting this error when i am running a stored procedure.



Transaction (Process ID XXXX) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.



i think so it is getting this error becasue it blocking it self at one point in the SP



DECLARE cty_Cursor CURSOR FOR
SELECT Country FROM TB_Country



declare @cty varchar(2)


OPEN cty_Cursor;
FETCH NEXT FROM cty_Cursor into @cty;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
EXEC SP_DO_SOMETHING @cty
FETCH NEXT FROM cty_Cursor into @cty;
END;
CLOSE cty_Cursor;
DEALLOCATE cty_Cursor;





i think so it calls the SP then before SP finsih its working it calls it back from cursor with other argument.



how we can make it sure it finish it execution before it is being called again. i think so we need some sort of lock here but i am not able to find right solution . please anyone suggest something.



Regards,

Haroon

View 2 Replies View Related

LOG: Process ID 59:0 Owns Resources That Are Block

Apr 11, 2007

Process ID 59:0 owns resources that are blocking processes on Scheduler 2

I am getting tons of this into sql server log second day in a row (2000 sp4)

Noticed heavy usage prior

What is causing it? Solution?


Kalman Toth, Database, DW & BI Architect
SQL Server 2005 Training - http://www.sqlusa.com

View 1 Replies View Related

Killed/Rollback Process Hogging ALL CPU Resources.

Feb 25, 2005

I have a test database for the end users to test their select queries for reports.
One of my users is writing queries that cause locking in the database. I killed the process last evening and they are in Killed/Rollback status but are still hogging 90% of the CPU resources for the past 12 hrs. I tried killing them several times but no go.

I know that the best way to clear of these processes is by restarting SQL Server. If that is not an option is there is any other way we can clean these processes?

Also the user running these queries has a read only and create view access to the database. From my experience processes that go into Kill/Rollback state after you kill them are processes associated with some update transaction. Since the user as far as i know is running Select commands would an infinite loop cause this ?


thanks
nina

View 8 Replies View Related

Process ID 152:3 Owns Resources That Are Blocking Processes On Scheduler 2.

Jun 5, 2007

Last night I received this error


Process ID 152:3 owns resources that are blocking processes on Scheduler 2.



When I did an BCC INPUTBUFFER I found it was sp_MSadd_repl_commands27hp which is doing the insert into MSrepl_commands has any else noticed and issue w/ sp_MSadd_repl_commands27hp blocking itself. At the time I had about 10 million records to move. I was using the default log reader settings so I was batching them in 500 chunk intervals.



I am wondering if any else has had problems like this? I basically see it whenever I move too much data through my replication server.



I found the followoing link http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319892




Sample Scenario

Client 1 connects to SQL Server.

Client 1 runs a Transact-SQL command that starts a transaction and performs data modification.

For example: begin tran
update authors set au_lname = 'test'
Client 1 becomes IDLE, shows up as sleeping, and awaiting a command with an open transaction in the sysprocesses system table.

Clients 2 through 255: Approximately 254 more clients log on to SQL Server and issue a SELECT from the authors table. These clients will all become blocked on the original update.

Client 1 tries to commit the transaction but it becomes queued because all the worker threads are tied up by clients 2 through 255.


I am afraid that I am seeing this more then I would like does anyone know a way to prevent this from happening?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server Down: Process ID 121:406 Owns Resources That Are Blocking Processes On Scheduler 4.

Sep 11, 2007

The following question applies to SQL Server 8.0.2187 (2000 + SP4+916287/914384/898709/915065/915340):

We have now twice had an incident where the same SQL Server has stopped responding. The only workaround is to restart the SQL Service. After this occurs, the log is filled with the following messages:

2007-09-10 16:42:14.29 spid3 Process ID 197:320 owns resources that are blocking processes on Scheduler 1.

2007-09-10 16:42:14.31 spid3 Process ID 74:324 owns resources that are blocking processes on Scheduler 5.


We haven't been able to pinpoint a cause or reporduce the problem on a dev server. I've seen several posts about this issue online but not many answers. Does anyone have any advice on how to troubleshoot this issue?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cub Lock Problem. Because It Is Being Used By Another Process

May 20, 2008

Hi Friends,

I am Kamesh presently facing a problem in deleting the cub file. If any one can help me
In my application
· I need to connect to the .Cub file
· fetch data
· close connection
· delete the cub file
After closing the connection the cub is still locked so I am unable to delete the file.
I am getting error "The process can not access the file '''C:Program FilesTNSOLA Cubpromotioncubfile88854793-0111-ffff-ffff-ffffffffffff.cub" because it is being used by another process.

Simply i tried open the cub and immediately closing the connection and called GC.Collect()
Trying to delete the cub file. It is not accepting.

Looking forward for any help.

Regards

Kamesh.

Code which i used is mentioned below.
using VS 2005 frame work 2.0.

Imports System.IO
Imports Microsoft.AnalysisServices.AdomdClient


Dim objConnection As New AdomdConnection

Try


objConnection.ConnectionString = "Provider ='msolap';Pooling='False'; Data Source = 'C:Program FilesTNSOLA Cubpromotioncubfile88854793-0111-ffff-ffff-ffffffffffff.cub'"
objConnection.Open()


'objConnection.Close()
objConnection.Dispose()
GC.Collect()

File.Delete(cubpath)
Catch ex As Exception
MsgBox(ex.Message)
End Try

View 2 Replies View Related

How To Lock The Store Procedure And Allow One Process To Acces It At A Time

Jul 20, 2005

Hello:I run one process that calls the following the store procedure andworks fine.create PROCEDURE sp_GetHostSequenceNumASBEGINSELECT int_parameter_dbf + 1FROM system_parameter_dbtWHERE parameter_name_dbf = 'seqNum'UPDATE system_parameter_dbtSET int_parameter_dbf = int_parameter_dbf + 1WHERE parameter_name_dbf = 'seqNum'ENDGOIf I run two processes that call the above store procedure, I mightoccasionally get the dirty data of int_parameter_dbt. I guess that iscaused by two processes accessing to the same resource simultaneously.Is there any way to lock the store procedure call from MSSQL Serverand allow only one process to access it at a time?Thanks for help.Best Jin

View 2 Replies View Related

Deadlock - Which Resources Are Really Deadlocked?

Apr 10, 2000

The errormessage after a deadlock gives very little information: "Your transaction (process ID #12) was deadlocked with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun your transaction."

But what resources, ie tables, indexes etc, are really deadlocked?

Is it possible to set a switch or something to log all relevant information about a deadlock for later investigation?

View 2 Replies View Related

FCB::Open: Operating System Error 32(The Process Cannot Access The File Because It Is Being Used By Another Process.) Occurred W

Dec 3, 2007

Hello all,
I am running into an interesting scenario on my desktop. I'm running developer edition on Windows XP Professional (9.00.3042.00 SP2 Developer Edition). OS is autopatched via corporate policy and I saw some patches go in last week. This machine is also a hand-me-down so I don't have a clean install of the databases on the machine but I am local admin.

So, starting last week after a forced remote reboot (also a policy) I noticed a few of the databases didn't start back up. I chalked it up to the hard shutdown and went along my merry way. Friday however I know I shut my machine down nicely and this morning when I booted up, I was in the same state I was last Wenesday. 7 of the 18 databases on my machine came up with

FCB:pen: Operating system error 32(The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.) occurred while creating or opening file 'C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLDataTest.mdf'. Diagnose and correct the operating system error, and retry the operation.
and it also logs
FCB:pen failed: Could not open file C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLDataTest.mdf for file number 1. OS error: 32(The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.).

I've caught references to the auto close feature being a possible culprit, no dice as the databases in question are set to False. Recovery mode varies on the databases from Simple to Full. If I cycle the SQL Server service, whatever transient issue it was having with those files is gone.
As much as I'd love to disable the virus scanner, network security would not be amused. The data and log files appear to have the same permissions as unaffected database files. Nothing's set to read only or archive as I've caught on other forums as possible gremlins. I have sufficient disk space and the databases are set for unrestricted growth.

Any thoughts on what I could look at? If it was everything coming up in RECOVERY_PENDING it's make more sense to me than a hit or miss type of thing I'm experiencing now.

View 13 Replies View Related

[Execute Process Task] Error:The Process Exit Code Was -1 While The Expected Was 0.

Mar 11, 2008

Dear list
Im designing a package that uses Microsofts preplog.exe to prepare web log files to be imported into SQL Server

What Im trying to do is convert this cmd that works into an execute process task
D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoad>preplog ex.log > out.log
the above dos cmd works 100%



However when I use the Execute Process Task I get this error
[Execute Process Task] Error: In Executing "D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoadpreplog.exe" "" at "D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoad", The process exit code was "-1" while the expected was "0".

There are two package varaibles
User::gsPreplogInput = ex.log
User::gsPreplogOutput = out.log

Here are the task properties
RequireFullFileName = True
Executable = D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoadpreplog.exe
Arguments =
WorkingDirectory = D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoad
StandardInputVariable = User::gsPreplogInput
StandardOutputVariable = User::gsPreplogOutput
StandardErrorVariable =
FailTaskIfReturnCodeIsNotSuccessValue = True
SuccessValue = 0
TimeOut = 0

thanks in advance
Dave

View 1 Replies View Related

Execute Process Task Error - The Process Exit Code Was 1 While The Expected Was 0.

Jan 30, 2007

How do I use the execute process task? I am trying to unzip the file using the freeware PZUnzip.exe and I tried to place the entire command in a batch file and specified the working directory as the location of the batch file, but the task fails with the error:

SSIS package "IngramWeeklyPOS.dtsx" starting.

Error: 0xC0029151 at Unzip download file, Execute Process Task: In Executing "C:ETLPOSDataIngramWeeklyUnzip.bat" "" at "C:ETLPOSDataIngramWeekly", The process exit code was "1" while the expected was "0".

Task failed: Unzip download file

SSIS package "IngramWeeklyPOS.dtsx" finished: Success.

Then I tried to specify the exe directly in the Executable property and the agruments as the location of the zip file and the directory to unzip the files in, but this time it fails with the following message:

SSIS package "IngramWeeklyPOS.dtsx" starting.

Error: 0xC002F304 at Unzip download file, Execute Process Task: An error occurred with the following error message: "%1 is not a valid Win32 application".

Task failed: Unzip download file

SSIS package "IngramWeeklyPOS.dtsx" finished: Success.

The command in the batch file when run from the command line works perfectly and unzips the file, so there is absolutely no problem with the command, I believe it is just the set up of the variables on the execute process task editor under Process. Any input on resolving this will be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Monisha

View 1 Replies View Related

Execute Process Task - Error :The Process Exit Code Was 2 While The Expected Was 0.

Mar 20, 2008



I am designing a utility which will keep two similar databases in sync. In other words, copying the new data from db1 to db2 and updating the old data from db1 to db2.

For this I am making use of the 'Tablediff' utility which when provided with server name, database, table info will generate .sql file which can be used to keep the target table in sync with the source table.

I am using the Execute Process Task and the process parameters I am providing are:



WorkingDirectory : C:Program Files (x86)Microsoft SQL Server90COM
Executable : C:SQL_bat_FilesSQL5TC_CTIcustomer.bat

The customer.bat file will have the following code:
tablediff -sourceserver "LV-SQL5" -sourcedatabase "TC_CTI" -sourcetable "CUSTOMER_1" -destinationserver "LV-SQL2" -destinationdatabase "TC_CTI" -destinationtable "CUSTOMER" -f "c:SQL_bat_Filessql5TC_CTIsql_filescustomer1"

the .sql file will be generated at: C:SQL_bat_Filessql5TC_CTIsql_filescustomer1.

The Problem:
The Execute Process Task is working fine, ie., the tables are being compared correctly and the .SQL file is being generated as desired. But the task as such is reporting faliure with the following error :

[Execute Process Task] Error: In Executing "C:SQL_bat_FilesSQL5TC_CTIpackage_occurrence.bat" "" at "C:Program Files (x86)Microsoft SQL Server90COM", The process exit code was "2" while the expected was "0". ]

Some of you may suggest to just set the ForceExecutionResult = Success (infact this is what I am doing now just to get the program working), but, this is not what I desire.

Can anyone help ?




View 9 Replies View Related

Integration Services :: Dataload Process - Error Capturing Process

Aug 20, 2014

I'm pulling data from Oracle db and load into MS-SQL 2008.For my data type checks during the data load process, what are options to ensure that the data being processed wouldn't fail. such that I can verify first in-hand with the target type of data and then if its valid format load it into destination table else mark it with error flag and push into errors table... All this at the row level.One way I can think of is to load into a staging table then get the source & destination table -column data types, compare them and proceed.

should I just try loading the data directly and if it fails try trouble shooting(which could be a difficult task as I wouldn't know what caused error...)

View 3 Replies View Related

ASPNETDB.MDF: The Process Cannot Access The File Because It Is Being Used By Another Process

Feb 17, 2007

Hi,
I'm trying to upload the ASPNETDB.MDF file to a hosting server via FTP, and everytime when it was uploaded half way(40% or 50%)
I would get an error message saying:
"550 ASPNETDB.MDF: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process"
 and then the upload failed.
 I'm using SQL Express. Does anybody know what's the cause?
 Thanks a lot

View 1 Replies View Related

Cannot Process Request Because The Process (3880) Has Exited.

Nov 15, 2007



Hi. When I try to start a package manually clicking the Start Debugging button I get this after a little while:


Cannot process request because the process (3880) has exited. (Microsoft.DataTransformationServices.VsIntegration)

How can I prevent this from happening? This happens every time I want to start the package and
every time the process id is different. Here it is 3880.

Darek

View 13 Replies View Related

Transaction Log Backup Process Hanging

Nov 5, 2002

Hi,

My transaction log backup task for the production database which normally takes about 10 seconds has been running for almost about 2 hours now.

Is there any way to stop it without restarting sql services? The scheduled task was stopped from the jobs but spid is still in 'runnable' status. I should not kill 'backup log' or 'xp_sqlmaint' tasks.( It doesn't solve the problem anyway. the SPID goes in rollback status and stays like that until server is rebooted). Any way to find out what causes this problem and how to prevent it?

Thanks,
Shaili

View 2 Replies View Related

Replication :: Process Could Not Set Last Distributed Transaction

Apr 29, 2015

The process could not execute 'sp_repldone/sp_replcounters' on 'sqldb2008'. (Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error number: MSSQL_REPL20011).The specified LSN {00000000:00000000:0000} for repldone log scan occurs before the current start of replication in the log {001317bf:0000f736:0008}. (Source: 

MSSQLServer, Error number: 18768).The process could not set the last distributed transaction. (Source: MSSQL_REPL, The process could not execute 'sp_repldone/sp_replcounters' on 'sqldb2008'. (Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error number: MSSQL_REPL22037)

View 2 Replies View Related

Multiple Process In A Single Transaction Using SB

Jul 21, 2006

We have a scenarion in a batch job. There are 3 sp's which are executed for every record in a table. After the execution of first sp the second sp executes depending upon the result of first sp. Simillarly for 2nd and 3rd sp.

Now if any sp execution fails than the whole transaction for that record in the table has to be rolled back.

Can this whole process of executing the multplie sp's insides a single transaction be accomplished using service broker with either a single queue or multiple queues?

                                              sp 1 (1 record)

                                 __________  l_____________

                                l                         l                            l sp2 ( 3 records for 1 record in sp1)

 

Simillalry for the one record in sp2, sp3 executes for multiple records.

Or in other words if processing of any message in a queue fails all the messages that have been processed already shoould be rolled back and no further execution should happen?

Also i would like to know can a conversation group be rolled back if processing of any message in the conversation group fails. I am asking this as we can club sp2 and sp3 together to get the results directly and than try for parallel processing.

P.S. We have a multiprocessor 64 bit server.

thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Can Table1 In Example Below Get Updated By Another Process While The Transaction Is In Progress?

Feb 15, 2006

I am afraid that just after @statusOfEmployee is retrieved from table1, but before table2 is updated, someone else (a second user) calls this same stored procedure and changes the @statusOfEmployee value. This would create an inconsistent update of table2 by first user, since the update of table2 'might' not have gone ahead if the latest value of @statusOF Employee was used. CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS SITUATION AND HOW I CAN BE SURE THAT ABOVE DOES NOT HAPPEN SINCE MULTIPLE USERS WILL BE HITTING THIS STORED PROCEDURE?
 
declare @status intbegin transet @status = (select statusOfEmployee from table1)if @@ERROR = 0   begin    update table2        set destination = @destination /* @destination is an input parameter passed to the sp*/        where @currentStatus = @status   if @ERROR = 0      commit tran   else      rollback tran   endelse     rollback tran
return

View 7 Replies View Related

Zombie Transaction In Process -2 Blocking Other Transactions

Jul 20, 2005

We are having a really big problem with a zombie process/transactionthat is blocking other processes. When looking at Lock/ProcessIDunder Current Activity I see a bunch of processes that are blocked byprocess 94 and process 94 is blocked by process -2. I assume -2 is azombie that has an open transaction. I cannot find this process tokill and it seems that this transaction is surviving databaserestarts. I know which table is locked up and when I run a select *from this table it never returns. Does anyone have any ideas as tohow to kill is transaction.Any help is appreciated.A. Tillman

View 4 Replies View Related

System Process Or User Process

Dec 20, 2006

select * from sysprocesses
How can I determine whether a process a system or user?

View 3 Replies View Related

Identify A Process Which Locked Other Process

Oct 11, 2007

Hello,



I have had a full lock on my sql server and I have a few logs to found the origin of the lock.

I know the process at the head of the lock is the 55 process.



Here are the information I have on this process:
Spid 55 55
ecid 5 5
Ecid 0 0
ObjId 0 1784601646
IndId 0 0
Type DB PAG
Resource 1:1976242
Mode S IS
Status TransID GRANT GRANT
TransID 0 16980
TransUOW 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000


lastwaittype PAGEIOLATCH_SH
CMD AWAITING COMMAND
Physycal id 1059
Login time 2007-07-05 04:29:53.873
nat address DFF06EBF974D
Wait type 0x0046
HostName .
BlkBy .
DBName grpprddb
CPUTime 54331
DiskIO 1059
ProgramName


Would someone know a way to identify the origin of the process 55?

I have already tried to execute the following request:
select * from SYSOBJECTS
where id=1784601646

But I have had no returns.



Regards,

Renaud

View 3 Replies View Related

The Process Cannot Access The File It Is Being Used By Another Process.

Aug 24, 2006

I have a File System Task Copy file operation to copy a file in an SSIS package. The package when scheduled as a job fails with the following error:

The process cannot access the file 'C:ETLConsignmentAppleAppleRawFile.txt' because it is being used by another process.".

However when I right click on the package and execute it manually from the Integration Services it runs successfully without any problem. I am not certain on how to resolve this issue any inputs will be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Monisha

View 19 Replies View Related

The Process Cannot Access The File Because It Is Being Used By Another Process.

Feb 6, 2008

Error: 0xC002F304 at Rename file 1, File System Task: An error occurred with the following error message: "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.".

When running two File System Tasks after each other, with the same file, the file is still locked when running the second task. Resulting in an error: 0xC002F304 at Rename file 1, File System Task: An error occurred with the following error message: "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.".


I found a workaround by addind a Execute Process Task before the second File System Task that pings to the localhost. This results in a 5 second delay, but there must be a better solution. Anyone?

View 9 Replies View Related

The Process Cannot Access The File Because It Is Being Used By Another Process.

Nov 23, 2006

While configuring log shipping using SQL 2000 Ent, the copy process failed with this message :

The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.

does anyone know what cause this ?

SAP R/3 is configured with the system, could this be the problem ?

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved