Transactions Are Still Pending For Distribution After Disable Transactional Replication
Apr 11, 2007
Recently we disabled the transactional replication on a prodution database(data size:300GB) , two weeks later we were aware of the transaction log of that db almost reached the limitation (70GB).I investigated the issues and found:
1. open transactions pending for distribution:
DBCC opentran('xxxx')
Replicated Transaction Information:
Oldest distributed LSN : (0:0:0)
Oldest non-distributed LSN : (323830:7083:1)
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
2. exec sp_replcounters, got over 240,000 replicated_transactions, which caused the tran log extremely large.
The transactional replication has been disabled on this server, there are no publication, distribution DBs any longer, all replication-related agents are also gone, why did this still happen???
3. use sp_repldone manaully reset those 240,000 transactions to distributed, check opentran, it was fine for a while. The tran log file was freed up 99% after that.
4. check open transactions and run sp_replcounters today, found the over 60000 transactions again on the db.
Did anybody experience the same issue and knows how to fix this issue and stop this happening ?
Many Thanks,
Henry
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 17, 2006
Hi
I use Sql Server 2000 with Service pack and transactional replication for transfering data between Servers and for comunication between Servers i use Dialup but it is a little Slow line.
Ihave a table that need transfer about 4700 records. I update this table and distributer Agent starts. at the Same time Icontrol Transfering by this Select in destination query Analiser:
Select Count(*) from TableName with (nolock)
it counts until about 3700 and retry again from 1 and so on agin..
Please gide me how can i overcome this problem
thank you for kindness
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2006
We are attempting to rollout a name and address system to 10,000 users who will use an application connected to an MSDE database.
We are using transactional replication to distribute data updates to them. Clients are connecting via the On-Idle feature of Synchronization Manager to grab transactions.
Server spec:
Network card: 1GB
Processors: 2* Xeon 3.2Ghz
Server spec: DL380 2Gb memory
Concurrent connections set to: 600
Disc: RAID 10 with 6400 controller
We are not using hyper-threading.
So far we have rolled the system out to 3500 subscribers, 500 per day.
Each day a subsciber will receive at least 400 transactions and 5000 commands.
Latency is 6 seconds, delivery rate 180 commands per second at less busy times.
Latency is 14 seconds, delivery rate 127 commands a second at busy times.
I have seen it get as slow as 0.04 commands a seconds at busy times.
The server becomes incredibly slow when there are more than 50 concurrent connections.
We are seeing 100 CPU for most of the day as clients connect to the distributor at various times. Lunchtime is particularly busy when people go to lunch, leaving their machines idle. We see lots of "time-outs" and "unable to connect to distributor" messages on the replication monitor during peak times.
What can we do to improve the performance of the distribution server?
Are we being over-ambitious by selection SQL Replication for this scenario?
Thank you for any help!
Best wishes
Julian
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2007
i read about what replication is and what are the types of replication but when i m trying to implement this i am unable to perform one of its type "Transactional Replication" i have no idea why this option is disable,can u plz guide me where i m wrong?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2008
Hi,
I have multiple questions and would appreciate any suggestions in resolving them. I'm a novice to these issues.
1) First of all, what is the exact command to setup the trunc. log on chkpt. option on for a transactional log of a SQL Server 2000 database? Is this option on by default? I have noticed for one of the databases I'm managing that the transaction log was over 12 GB, while the db was only 425 MB.
2) How's it possible to run a DBCC TRACEON to see the content of the transaction log to see if we are having any issues with any uncommitted transactions, i.e. updates, inserts, and/or deletes.
3) What are the commands to truncate inactive transactions and increasing the readbatchsize?
4) lastly, how do I validate transactional replication via checksum and find valid latency between a small number of changes that need to be committed between publisher and subscriber.
Thank you so much in advance!
Sincerely,
Alla
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2008
i have a small doubt
where to see the pending transactions in transactional replication
For a database can we have multiple publications
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2015
Any command through that can I delete/disable the DWORD value "Pendingfilerename operations" so that while I start the SQL Install work, it does not fail due to this and can write this as one of the precheck options.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2006
hello All,
i am trying to delete publications in SQL 2000, SP4 and getting this
error:
SQL Server Enterprise Manager could not disable publishing and distribution on '<publishername>'.
Error 3724 : cannot drop the procedure
'dbo.sp_sel_F854ED4CD7EA4399EFDB9697F4E24A10_pal' because itis being used for replication.
Thanks and Regards
Kanna
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2007
We have quite a lot of Transactional replication, and over the past few weeks it had become quite slow. I spent the last few days trying to resolve the problem and found that a Push subscription was delivering transactions at about 50/sec and a Pull subscription was delivering at around 700/sec.
This test was run on the Same publication, same subscriber so hardware and links are all the same, the only difference was the type of subscription. I've since changed a few of our subscriptions for the larger publications and have found they run quicker than previously.
Has anyone else seen this behavour and is there a valid reason why this would occur. The distributor and subscriber are both running SQL2005 SP1 and the publisher is SQL2000 SP4.
If anyone could shed some light on this it would be appreciated.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2006
Hello,
I'm interested in combining the Peer-to-Peer Transactional Replication and Standard Transactional Replication to provide a scale out solution of SQL Server 2005. The condition is as follows:
We may have 10 SQL Server 2005 (1 Publisher + 9 Subscriber) running transactional replication in the production environment and allow updates in subscribers. To offload the loading of the publisher, we plan to have 2 Publisher (PubNode1 and PubNode2) using Peer-to-Peer Transaction Replication and the rest 8 subscribers will be divided into 2 groups. The subscribers 1-4 (SubNode1, SubNode2, SubNode3, and SubNode4) will be set to be standard transactional replication subscribers of PubNode1, and the rest 4 subscribers (SubNode5, ..., SubNode8) will be set to be standard transactional replication subscribers of PubNode2.
Is it possible to setup above 2 Publisher + 8 Subscriber topology?
Also, could we set the 8 subscribers with updatable subscriptions to achieve each node is updatable?
We do not plan to set all the 10 nodes using Peer-to-Peer Transactional Replication as it is necessary to make sure n*(n-1)/2 (i.e. 45) peer-to-peer connections is reliable. It seems that the maintenance cost is high if the servers are not in a LAN and the topology is very high coupling. So we prefer to divide the 10 nodes into 2 groups and reduce the cost of each node to maintain the connections to all other sites.
That's the scenario.
Any feedback is welcome and appreciated.
Thanks,
Terence
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2007
I'm getting this, after upgrading from 2000 to 2005.Replication-Replication Distribution Subsystem: agent (null) failed.The subscription to publication '(null)' has expired or does notexist.The only suggestions I've seen are to dump all subscriptions. Sincewe have several dozen publications to several servers, is there adecent way to script it all out, if that's the only suggestion?Thanks in advance.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2007
Hi,I have transactional replication set up on on of our MS SQL 2000 (SP4)Std Edition database serverBecause of an unfortunate scenario, I had to restore one of thepublication databases. I scripted the replication module and droppedthe publication first. Then did a full restore.When I try to set up the replication thru the script, it created thepublication with the following error messageServer: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure SYNC_FCR ToGPRPTS_GL00100, Line 1There is already an object named 'SYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100' in thedatabase.It seems the previous replication has set up these system viewsSYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100. And I have tried dropping the replicationmodule again to see if it drops the views but it didn't.The replication fails with some wired error & complains about thisviews when I try to run the synch..I even tried running the sp_removedbreplication to drop thereplication module, but the views do not seem to disappear.My question is how do I remove these system views or how do I make thereplication work without using these views or create new views.. Whyis this creating those system views in the first place?I would appreciate if anyone can help me fix this issue. Please feelfree to let me know if any additional information or scripts needed.Thanks in advance..Regards,Aravin Rajendra.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 2, 2015
I have been researching on the proper steps or sequence to follow to completely remove SQL Server 2012 Transactional Replication. Â I have read articles about using SSMS as well as using replication stored procedures and some procedures use SQLCMD or just regular TSQL executed in SSMS. Â I have also read articles where people said all you really need is connect to the Publisher instance, find the publication you want to remove and choose "Delete" and everything will be taken care of behind the scene. I have three SQL servers that participate in transactional replication. Â SQL-P (publisher),Â
SQL-D (distributor) and SQL-S (subscriber). Â Do I need to connect to the distributor instance and the subscriber instance when removing transactional replication or is it just really connecting to the publisher and click delete on the publication? I want everything gone including any metadata, systems tables, distributions db and any other replication objects created during the initial configuration.
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2001
I seem to be having trouble with the distribution agent not doing what I want it to do. I have set up a few publications to run all the time but when I want to schedule a publication to run once a day this doesn't happen it defaults to run all the time.
Can the distrubition agent run some publications continusly and some publications scheduled?
Can anyone shed some light on this problem.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2000
Please, i need some help with the replication i had configured.
I have two publications to the same subscriber, one with data filters and other not.
The one without data filters i have test manualy. But now after i have created the other one, the log reader says that '145 transactions with 347 commands' were delivered, but the distribution agents says that 'no replicated transactions are avaiable'.
I know that have many things to be replicated, but doesn´t work.
The Sql server agent is working on the distributor.
There is something that can be causing this error ?????
Please, if someone can help me i apologize
Thanks in regards
Sandra Lino
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 1999
When setting up Replication in v. 6.5, a 'distribution' database is created, containing these tables:
MSjobs
MSjob_commands
MSjob_subscriptions
MSsubscriber_info
MSsubscriber_jobs
MSsubscriber_status
However, they cannot be accessed via the SQL Server Enterprise Manager interface like tables in other databases, at least I can't get to them. Is this a problem or a feature? I can query them to get their contents, but I'm wondering if there might be something wrong with my installation of SQL Server.
Any knowledge shared would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Karl Simanonok
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 25, 2004
What happens when Distributor Server goes down in Transactional
Replication, no corruption (power , hardware failure)??
Thanks,
John
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2006
Hi all replication experts...
I have created transactional replication on my servers (production server and backup server) and created pull subscription at the backup server. On my production server that also is a distributor and publisher there exist two agents, Snapshot agent and Log reader in the Publishers folder under replication Monitor.
There are also another agent with the backup server name and database name: BackServ:DBName having the type Pull and 'No replicated transactions are available' as Last Action. My question is: What is this? Must it be there?
Grateful for answers
Best,
/M
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2001
I have setup a replication and after 24 hours this are the error messages I have got:Last action; The database 'supersite' on server 'solomon' does not exist. Full error message: Could not locate entry in sysdatabases for database 'superiste'. No entry found with that name.Make sure that the name is entered correctly. Can anyone out there help me out?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 9, 2002
I seem to have an orphaned Distribution Agent. There is no associated Publication and the agent is sending errors. The errors would be legitimate if only I had an associated publication. I also do not have an associated Snapshot Agent.
How can I get rid of this bogus agent? I already deleted the associated job and rebooted SQL and SQLAgent but it still persists.
Any help would be appreciated.
Colleen
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2006
I have been seeing this issue for several weeks now. The distribution agent will become idle even though there is activity occurring within the replicated database. If I manually start the distribution agent, it will begin retrieving the transactions. I thought that this might be due to inactivity but I have modified the inactivity threshold and I am not receiving an actual inactive agent warning. There are no warnings -- it simply sits there and does not resume sending transactions.
Any thoughts? This is a transactional replication with a distribution agent that is run at the subscriber.
Thanks,
MV
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2007
Somebody now what is the correct process to move the Distribution BD to another Disk with out affect the defined replication
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2004
Hello,
We are setting up Merge replication and size of the database is
85 GB. How much disk size is feasible to keep for distribution Database.
Is there any % basis (SIZE) for Distribution DB according to the size of the database?
Is it feasible to keep seperate server for Distribution Server or keeping
Publisher and distributor on same same.
Can any one help me!
Thanks!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi,For some magical reason, my database replication has suddenly stoppedworking. I modified the publication but the Distribution agent willnot run; the snapshot does not get applied to the subscriber, andchanges made at the publisher do not get replicated.My configuration is: Transactional Replication with a 'Pull'Subscription. The Subscriber is Updateable with Immediate UpdatesOnly. All created via the SQL Server Enterprise Manager. Both thePublisher and Subscriber are on the same server. I'm running SQLServer 2000 (8.00.760 SP3), on Windows 2000 Server (5.0 (2195)).I manually run the snapshop agent. It runs fine with the status'Succeeded' and the Last Action is 'A Snapshot of X article(s) wasgenerated'.When I look at the distribution agent, things start to get a bitconfusing in ( <SERVERNAME>/Replication Monitor/ Publishers/<SERVERNAME?>/ Publication/ Subscription), the status staysconstantly at 'Never Started'. All other columns are either blank or0. When I right click over the subscription, both Start Synchronisingand Stop Synchronising are NOT greyed out. If I click on either StartSynchronising or Stop Synchronising (absolutely) nothing happens(except the mouse turns 'busy' for a fraction of a second). There areno error messages.I added -output c:sqlout.txt -outputverboselevel 3 to thedistribution agent command. C:sqlout.txt did not get created.It worked fine up to a couple of days ago. I'm not sure exactly whatcaused the problem, as I made a few changes at the same time. Thechanges included: adding a new transactional publication, adding morearticles to an existing transaction publication, and adding a mergepublication. I've tried to go back to the set up before I made thechanges, even disabling replication and starting again from scratch.Still the problem persists.The owner of the distribution agent has dbo permissions in both thepublishing and subscribing database. Under 'Publisher and DistributorProperties' I've set the 'Replication Agent Connection to Publisher'and 'Agent Connection to the Subscriber' both to Use SQL ServerAuthentication, both with the same account that has dbo permissions inboth publishing and subscribing database.Has anybody come across this problem before? Can anybody make anysuggestions? Thanks in advance for your help.RegardsDamian HelmeIS ManagerINTEC Engineering (UK) Ltd.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2007
I want to list out the pending transaction for transaction replication by publication.
Help needed.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2007
I am working on bringing our disaster recovery site to be a live site. Currently we replicate to one of out servers (server B) with merge replication (from server A). Server A also does one way transactional replication form some table to several other servers including servers at the DR site.
This setup is not going to be fast enough for what we need so I am wondering if a table is receiving merge replication will the merge updates also replicate down the transaction path??
Example...
Server B update a row and merges to Server A. With this update them replicate (via transactional) to Server C??
thanks...
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2000
I have set up replication on two SQL Servers (6.5), SP5a, on NT 4.0 (SP3). The Distribution Task on the Publisher is failing with the following error:
08001[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][dbnmpntw]Specified SQL Server not found.
I am using standard security in a workgroup environment. I have my trusted connection setup and I am using named pipes. I had this process working on our test servers but when I tried to implement it into production I received the above message. Please give me some ideas or things to try. What source can I use to look up the 08001 error?
Thanks, Kevin
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 1999
I am now getting the following error:
Replication-Distribution: Task 'CAServer_Page_VAServer_InPage' failed. 3700[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server] Login Failed - User: Reason: Not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection.
I checked under the SQL Security Manager, View, SA Privilege and my sqlexecutivent login is set up as:
CAServersqlexecutivent sa
Thanks in advance for any tips you can give me with this. Both servers are set up in a workgroup. We are not using Domains.
Also, should my table already exist on the Subscribing Server?
------------
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2015
I have transnational replication setup on two environments, on one server distribution database is tiny, but on the second server the distribution database is 5 times bigger, and taking up lot of space, both environments have almost same size of data.
View 15 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2000
Hi,
I am trying to disable transactional replication, but am having some problems. I used the wizard, however, it has taken 7 hours so far and is still not done. SQL Server (7.0) is showing the connection as runnable but it seems as if nothing is being removed. Am I missing something? Should I have done something else before running the wizard? I can't even kill the SPID.
Can anyone help or offer some advice?
Thanks in advance...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2000
Hi, guys
I have an urgent problem in replication.
Yesterday I set up a Transaction replication with 1 publication
Server A (publisher)(push)(SQL 7)
Server B (distributor and subscriber)(SQL 7)
The replication was succesful and the suscriber can get correct data.
This morning I found the Red sigh in replication mornitor/miscellaneous agents.The error message is:
"The job failed. Unable to determine if the owner (domain nameuser ID) of job Agent history clean up: distribution has server access (reason: Could not obtain information about Windows NT group/user 'domain name'. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 8198))."
I tried to use the 'disable publishing and distribution wizard' to disable this replication, but it did not finish and the screen jusr freeze. I used the task manager to end the task.
then I check the replication monitor, the publication was gone but the RED sigh still there.
I tried to use sp_dropdistpublisher to drop a Publisher
but it said "the server A is not a distributor"
I tried to use sp_dropdistributiondb to delete the distribution database.
but it said "Could not drop the distribution database 'distribution'.
This distributor database is associated with a Publisher."
I tried to use sp_dropdistributor to remove the Distributor .
but it said "Could not drop the Distributor 'Server B'.
This Distributor has associated distribution databases."
Any suggestion? Thank you in advance.
Theresa
View 2 Replies
View Related
