What are the maximum columns that SQL can handle?
If I use a table that has about 300 columns and 100,000 records for a web application, Is it going to cause a performance problem?
Have anyone experience in using the size of table like this on web application?
Thank you,
Vi
Hi there,
I am trying to create an application that requires n number of columns in table on run time. For example, I want to create a table of products and its properties. For that, I can use master and detail tables, but my problem starts when I get different number of characteristics for different products. Lets say, I have a product that has some colour and size, but for another product, I need expiry date as well and it continues like this. Now I want to know, what I can do to handle this problem. Please help me in this.
Best Regards,
Asif Hameed
Hello
I have this newbie question regarding SSIS:
I have a table named People(#Code, Name, eMailList), where the column eMailList has a list of email addresses separated by commas, like "someone@hotmail.com,someone@gmail.com,someone@yahoo.com".
I would like that for each Person, extract the email address info in such a way that I can insert into the following table: EMail(#Code, #ID, Address), where Address has a single email address.
How can I accomplish that?
Thanks a lot.
Hi,
Does anyone know what is the maximum number of columns allowed in a matrix?
Thanks.
How can we find maximum value on column level? Suppose we have table A with four columns col1,col2,col3,col4, Now my query look likes this:
Select col1, col2,col3,col4,
(col1 + col2) as addcol1,
(col2 + col3) as addcol2,
(col3 + col4) as addcol3,
Max(addcol1,addcol2,addcol3) as maxvalue
from Table A
I am getting error as max accepts one argument, I cannot use case statement as table is already bulky and it will make my query more expensive.
Hello friends,
I am sorry to be posting this message in this forum. But thought if anyone does have any idea abt my problem, which i illustrate below.
I want to know what is the maximum number of columns that an INSERT statement can handle?
I have come across a situation where i need to insert 15 values in a table.
INSERT INTO myTable (col1, col2, col3,....., col15) VALUES (v1, v2, v3,...., v15).
Actual statement:
INSERT INTO BillSell (bnumber, stock, qty, price, tprice, seen, bill_id, brokerage, service_tax, brok_st, stt, brok_st_stt, total_cost, total_rate_pu, check)
VALUES ('ICICI 06-12-2004 reshma', 'RELIND', 10, 541.7375183271872, 5417.375183271873, 'no', 2402, 40.2375, 4.92507, 45.162569999999995, 6.771718979089841, 51.934288979089835, 5365.0, 536.5, 'check')
When I call this in Java program, it asks me to check the syntax of the statement as follows :
com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'check) VALUES ('ICICI 06-12-2004 reshma', 'RELIND', 10, 541.7375183271872, 5417.' at line 1
Please make notice that all the data types of the table columns and the values passed in the statement match.
Now the problem is that, when from the above INSERT statement, i remove the last column (i.e. the "check" column and its corresponding value passed i.e. 'check'), the code works fine. I observe here that now there are 14 columns in the statement.
So i need the solutions for this. I cannot move further in the program......
Please help.
Trust in Technology mate .....'Not in Human Beings'
Hi ,
I am trying to run a fulltext query and I get the following error message:
"Too many full-text columns or the full-text query is too complex to be executed"
Does anybody know if there is a limitation in the number of columns? Or what can cause this error?
Here is the sql:
SELECT DISTINCT FT_TBL.CapId, FT_TBL.Title, FT_TBL.PubMedId, FT_TBL.IssueYear, Rank
FROM ClinicalLiteratureTbl AS FT_TBL,
CONTAINSTABLE(ClinicalLiteratureTbl, *, '("body mass index" OR "BMI" OR "Quetelet`s Index" OR "Quetelet Index" OR "Quetelets Index") AND ("myocardial infarction" OR "myocardial infarct" OR "MI" OR "myocardium infarct" OR "myocardium infarction" OR "cardiac infarction" OR "myocardial necrosis" OR "coronary attack" OR "myocardium necrosis" OR "myocardial infarction syndrome" OR "myocardial necrosis syndrome" OR "heart attack" OR "coronary thrombosis" OR "AMI" OR "post-AMI" OR "post AMI" OR "post infarction" OR "post-infarction")') AS KEY_TBL WHERE FT_TBL.ArticleID = KEY_TBL.[KEY] AND FT_TBL.RaterGroupId IN (1,2,3,4) ORDER BY IssueYear DESC
Thanks
I am upgrading from Access, where you can only have 10 fields in a primary key or unique index. Is this also the limit in SQL Server? If not, what is the limit?
Thanks for any help on this.
I am adding a table within my vb.net program using New datatable(tblname) function, then adding 22 columns (col01 to col22) to this table using .columns.add (colname) function without any error.The program however throws an exception when trying to assign a value to column number 14 (col14) saying this column does not belong to table tblname. Assigning a value from col01 to col13 is working fine.Is there a limitation on number of columns can be added to a table using code?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello
I have this newbie question regarding SSIS:
I have a table named People(#Code, Name, eMailList), where the column eMailList has a list of email addresses separated by commas, like "someone@hotmail.com,someone@gmail.com,someone@yaho o.com".
I would like that for each Person, extract the email address info in such a way that I can insert into the following table: EMail(#Code, #ID, Address), where Address has a single email address.
How can I accomplish that?
Thanks a lot.
I have a scenario where we have to handle dynamically changing source columns.
For example , some times in the source files the number of columns will be increased or decreased, new columns can be added in the middle or in the end of the source file.
How to handle this kind of scenario in the SSIS ?
I'm using 2 OLE DB Commands; 1 to perform an insert the other an update. I have found that on the column mapping tab, I only have 10 parameters available to map to. The issue is I need 40 parameters. Am I doing something wrong? Is there a setting I am missing? Is there another way to do this? Am I out of luck .
Here is the sql query I am using, so you can see that I have the correct number of parameters listed:
Insert into Reqs_Data (G_COLLECTDATE, PROGRAM, PRODUCT_ID, TOTAL, ADDED, CHANGED, DELETED, NOT_ALLOCATED, NEWREQS, MODIFIED, LEGACY, UNCATEGORIZED, NOT_TRACED_DOWN, NOT_TRACED_UP, PASSED, PARTIALLY_PASSED, WAIVED, FAILED, NOT_VERIFIED, PLANNED_ADDED, RQTS_TOTAL_TBD_COUNT, RQTS_TOTAL_MODS_IN_MONTH, BUILD_ID, RTM_PRODUCT_ID, TRACED_UP, TRACED_DOWN, ALLOCATED, LASTMONTHTOTAL, CALC_ADD, CALC_DELETE, IS_TRACED_DOWN, IS_TRACED_UP, LEVEL3, LEVEL2, LEVEL1, LEVEL0, IPT1, IPT2, IPT3, IPT4 ) Values(?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)
Update Reqs_Data SET TOTAL = ?, ADDED = ?, CHANGED = ?, DELETED = ?, NOT_ALLOCATED = ?, NEWREQS = ?, MODIFIED = ?, LEGACY = ?, UNCATEGORIZED = ?, NOT_TRACED_DOWN = ?, NOT_TRACED_UP = ?, PASSED = ?, PARTIALLY_PASSED = ?, WAIVED = ?, FAILED = ?, NOT_VERIFIED = ?, PLANNED_ADDED = ?, RQTS_TOTAL_TBD_COUNT = ?, RQTS_TOTAL_MODS_IN_MONTH = ?, BUILD_ID = ?, RTM_PRODUCT_ID = ?, TRACED_UP = ?, TRACED_DOWN = ?, ALLOCATED = ?, LASTMONTHTOTAL = ?, CALC_ADD = ?, CALC_DELETE = ?, IS_TRACED_DOWN = ?, IS_TRACED_UP = ?, LEVEL3 = ?, LEVEL2 = ?, LEVEL1 = ?, LEVEL0 = ?, IPT1 = ?, IPT2 = ?, IPT3 = ?, IPT4 = ?
WHERE G_Collectdate = ? AND Program = ? AND PRODUCT_ID = ?
What is the maximum number of columns you can have in a sql server express 2005 table?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have some code I build 2 weeks ago which I’ve been running daily but it’s suddenly stopped working with the following error.
“The table "tbl_Intraday_Tmp" has been created, but its maximum row size exceeds the allowed maximum of 8060 bytes. INSERT or UPDATE to this table will fail if the resulting row exceeds the size limit” When I google this there seems to be a related to tables with vast numbers of columns.
My table tbl_Intraday_tmp is relatively small. It has 7 columns. 1 of varchar(5), 3 of decimal(9,3) and 2 of decimal(18,0). The bit I’m puzzled with is it was working and stopped.
I don’t recall changing anything but I wouldn’t rule that out. I ‘ve inspected the source files and I don’t believe they have changed either.
DECLARE
@FileName varchar(50),
@Path varchar(50),
@SqlCmd varchar(1000)
= '',
@ASXCode varchar(5),
@Offset decimal(18,0),
[code]....
I am using MS SQL server 2008, and i have a table with 350 columns and when i m trying to create one more column its giving error with below message -
Warning: The table XXX has been created, but its maximum row size exceeds the allowed maximum of 8060 bytes.
INSERT or UPDATE to this table will fail if the resulting row exceeds the size limit.
how can i resolve this?
SQL Server 2000 8.00.760 (SP3)I've been working on a test system and the following UDF worked fine.It runs in the "current" database, and references another database onthe same server called 127-SuperQuote.CREATE FUNCTION fnGetFormattedAddress(@WorkID int)RETURNS varchar(130)ASBEGINDECLARE@Address1 As varchar(50)@ReturnAddress As varchar(130)SELECT@Address1 = [127-SuperQuote].dbo.tblCompany.Address1FROM[Work] INNER JOIN[127-SuperQuote].dbo.tblCompany ON [Work].ClientID =[127-SuperQuote].dbo.tblCompany.CompanyIDWHERE[Work].WorkID = @WorkIDIF @Address1 IS NOT NULLSET @ReturnAddress = @ReturnAddress + @Address1 + CHAR(13)+ CHAR(10)RETURN @ReturnAddressENDSo now the system has gone live and it turns out that the live"SuperQuote" database is on a different server.I've linked the server and changed the function as below, but I get anerror both in QA and when checking Syntax in the UDF builder:The number name 'Zen.SuperQuote.dbo.tblCompany' contains more than themaximum number of prefixes. The maximum is 3.CREATE FUNCTION fnGetFormattedAddress(@WorkID int)RETURNS varchar(130)ASBEGINDECLARE@Address1 As varchar(50)@ReturnAddress As varchar(130)SELECT@Address1 = Zen.SuperQuote.dbo.tblCompany.Address1FROM[Work] INNER JOINZen.SuperQuote.dbo.tblCompany ON [Work].ClientID =Zen.SuperQuote.dbo.tblCompany.CompanyIDWHERE[Work].WorkID = @WorkIDIF @Address1 IS NOT NULLSET @ReturnAddress = @ReturnAddress + @Address1 + CHAR(13)+ CHAR(10)RETURN @ReturnAddressENDHow can I get round this? By the way, I've rather simplified thefunction to ease readability. Also, I haven't posted any DDL because Idon't think that's the problem!ThanksEdward
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi
I'm using service broker and keep getting errors in the log even though everythig is working as expected
SQL Server 2005
Two databases
Two end points - 1 in each database
Two stored procedures:
SP1 is activated when a message enters the sending queue. it insert a new row in a table
SP2 is activated when a response is sent from the receiving queue. it cleans up the sending queue.
I have a table with an update trigger
In that trigger, if the updted row meets a certain condition a dialogue is created and a message is sent to the sending queue.
I know that SP1 and SP2 are behaving properly because i get the expected result.
Sp1 is inserteding the expected data in the table
SP2 is cleaning up the sending queue.
In the Sql Server log however i'm getting errors on both of the stored procs.
error #1
The activated proc <SP 1 Name> running on queue Applications.dbo.ffreceiverQueue output the following: 'The conversation handle is missing. Specify a conversation handle.'
error #2
The activated proc <SP 2 Name> running on queue ADAPT_APP.dbo.ffsenderQueue output the following: 'The conversation handle is missing. Specify a conversation handle.'
I would appreceiate anybody's help into why i'm getting this. have i set up the stored procs in correctly?
i can provide code of the stored procs if that helps.
thanks.
Having successfully created :
- a data mining structure with about 80 columns.
- a data mining model using Microsoft_Decision_Trees with 2 prediction columns.
I thought I would then explore the possibility of have more than 2 prediction columns, in this case 20.
I get an error message and I can't work out :
a) if this is because there's a limit to the maximum number of prediction columns and where that maximum is stated.
b) if something else has become corrupted
c) there's a know bug and if the error message is either meaningful or not.
Either way, I'm unable to complete the data mining wizard
The error message is :Errors in the metadata manager. Either the mining structure with the ID of '[my model Structure]' does not exist in the database with the ID of 'DMAddinsDB', or the user does not have permissions to access the object.
We have implemented our service broker architecture using conversation handle reuse per MS/Remus's recommendations. We have all of the sudden started receiving the conversation handle not found errors in the sql log every hour or so (which makes perfect sense considering the dialog timer is set for 1 hour). My question is...is this expected behavior when you have employed conversation recycling? Should you expect to see these messages pop up every hour, but the logic in the queuing proc says to retry after deleting from your conversation handle table so the messages is enqueued as expected?
Second question...i think i know why we were not receiving these errors before and wanted to confirm this theory as well. In the queuing proc I was not initializing the variable @Counter to 0 so when it came down to the retry logic it could not add 1 to null so was never entering that part of the code...I am guessing with this set up it would actually output the error to the application calling the queueing proc and NOT into the SQL error logs...is this a correct assumption?
I have attached an example of one of the queuing procs below:
Code Block
DECLARE @conversationHandle UNIQUEIDENTIFIER,
@err int,
@counter int,
@DialogTimeOut int,
@Message nvarchar(max),
@SendType int,
@ConversationID uniqueidentifier
select @Counter = 0 -- THIS PART VERY IMPORTANT LOL :)
select @DialogTimeOut = Value
from dbo.tConfiguration with (nolock)
where keyvalue = 'ConversationEndpoints' and subvalue = 'DeleteAfterSec'
WHILE (1=1)
BEGIN
-- Lookup the current SPIDs handle
SELECT @conversationHandle = [handle] FROM tConversationSPID with (nolock)
WHERE spid = @@SPID and messagetype = 'TestQueueMsg';
IF @conversationHandle IS NULL
BEGIN
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @conversationHandle
FROM SERVICE [InitiatorQueue_SER]
TO SERVICE 'ReceiveTestQueue_SER'
ON CONTRACT [TestQueueMsg_CON]
WITH ENCRYPTION = OFF;
BEGIN CONVERSATION TIMER ( @conversationHandle )
TIMEOUT = @DialogTimeOut
-- insert the conversation in the association table
INSERT INTO tConversationSPID
([spid], MessageType,[handle])
VALUES
(@@SPID, 'TestQueueMsg', @conversationHandle);
SEND ON CONVERSATION @conversationHandle
MESSAGE TYPE [TestQueueMsg] (@Message)
END
ELSE IF @conversationHandle IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
SEND ON CONVERSATION @conversationHandle
MESSAGE TYPE [TestQueueMsg] (@Message)
END
SELECT @err = @@ERROR;
-- if succeeded, exit the loop now
IF (@err = 0)
BREAK;
SELECT @counter = @counter + 1;
IF @counter > 10
BEGIN
-- Refer to http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms164086.aspx for severity levels
EXEC spLogMessageQueue 20002, 8, 'Failed to SEND on a conversation for more than 10 times. Error %i.'
BREAK;
END
-- We tried on the said conversation, but failed
-- remove the record from the association table, then
-- let the loop try again
DELETE FROM tConversationSPID
WHERE [spid] = @@SPID;
SELECT @conversationHandle = NULL;
END;
Hello:
I am running into an issue with RS2k PDF export.
Case: Exporting Report to PDF/Printing/TIFF
Report: Contains 1 table with 19 Columns. 1 column is static, the other 18 are visible at the users descretion. Report when printed/exported to pdf spans 2 pages naturally, 16 on the first page, 3 on the second, and the column widths have been adjusted to provide a perfect page span .
User A elects to hide two of the columns, and show the rest. The report complies and the viewable version is perfect, the excel export is perfect.. the PDF export on the first page causes every fith column, starting with the last column that was hidden to be expanded to take up additional width. On the spanned page, it renders the first column on that page correctly, then there is a white space gap equal to the width of the hidden columns and then the rest of the cells show with the last column expanded to take up the same width that the original 2 columns were going to take up, plus its width.
We have tried several different settings to see if it helps this issue or makes it worse. So far cangrow/canshrink/keep together have made no impact. It is not possible to increase the page size due to limited page size selection availablility for the client. There are far too many combinations of what the user can elect to show or hide to put together different tables to show and hide on the same report to remove this effect.
Any help or suggestion on this issue would be appreciated
Do I have other option beside using IF..ELSE IF? TIF
-- GET INFORMATION OF THE JOB
DECLARE @JOBIDAS Char(10)
DECLARE @VRUSERVICEHRSAS Decimal(18,2)
DECLARE @VRUSERVICEMINAS Decimal(18,2)
DECLARE @BILLEDFLATAS Decimal(18,2)
DECLARE @BILLREGRATEAS Decimal(18,2)
DECLARE @MIN_HRSAS Decimal(18,2)
DECLARE @COUNT_GREATER_MINTinyInt
DECLARE @COUNT_LESS_MINTinyInt
SET @VRUSERVICEMIN = 46
SET @BILLEDFLAT = 0
-- PROCESS ONLY RECORDS WHERE THERE IS NO FLAT FEE
IF @BILLEDFLAT = 0
BEGIN
IF @VRUSERVICEMIN BETWEEN 0 AND 15
BEGIN
SET @VRUSERVICEMIN = .25
END
ELSE IF @VRUSERVICEMIN = 15
BEGIN
SET @VRUSERVICEMIN = .25
END
ELSE IF @VRUSERVICEMIN BETWEEN 15 AND 30
BEGIN
SET @VRUSERVICEMIN = .5
END
ELSE IF @VRUSERVICEMIN = 30
BEGIN
SET @VRUSERVICEMIN = .5
END
ELSE IF @VRUSERVICEMIN BETWEEN 30 AND 45
BEGIN
SET @VRUSERVICEMIN = .75
END
ELSE IF @VRUSERVICEMIN = 45
BEGIN
SET @VRUSERVICEMIN = .75
END
ELSE IF @VRUSERVICEMIN > 45
BEGIN
SET @VRUSERVICEMIN = 1
END
END
PRINT @VRUSERVICEMIN
Is it possible to catch and error and then keep the process going in a stored procedure?
So if an update encounters a primary key violation on a row, is it possible to skip that row and keep the process going?
Hi! I have some try .. catch block trying to insert some data into database. During its action duplicate key row insert error could raise, for example. The question is how could I know distinguish it from other sql errors? Object ex (Catch ex As Exception) has only message property '{"Cannot insert duplicate key row in object 'dbo.Group_Courses' with unique index 'IX_Group_Courses'.The statement has been terminated."}' and type System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException. Knowing the type of error is not enough, because there are different SqlExceptions. Even the message is not unique for this error, because now i deal with 'dbo.Group_Courses' and then it could be other table. Is there something that unique identifies each error? For example error code. If it exists, where could I get it?
Thanks in advance!
I test my the now function and it is getting the right date. When I try to send that to the sql database I have it turns it into 1/1/1900. Does anyone know why this is happening, I have tried everything Here is my code:
sql = "Insert into tblguestbook(date, name, city, state, email, Url, Comments)Values ('"
sql = sql & Request.Form(Now) & "','"
sql = sql & Request.Form("nametxt") & "','"
sql = sql & Request.Form("citytxt") & "','"
sql = sql & Request.Form("statetxt") & "','"
sql = sql & Request.Form("emailtxt") & "','"
sql = sql & Request.Form("urltxt") & "','"
sql = sql & Request.Form("commentstxt") & "');"
Hi,
I have a table with one field set at nvarchar (4000)
This is sometimes not big enough and I get an error that the max row size has been reached.
How do people handle the error when the max row size is reached and gracefully inform the user?
Also, should I really be using Ntext instead, would this be better - is there a performance penalty?
Much obliged.
RG
Hi,
I would like to handle a sql error in t-sql and return a certain value in case error occurs. For example if I would like to add a record I want to return a certain identity value or maybe a status of transaction (0 for incomplete, 1 for succesfull trans).
If error occurs in sql I cannot return any values back to asp.net because of What I am doing at the moment is catching an error in asp.net and then displaying an error message. Is there a way to return only a return value to asp.net and somehow handle the error in t-sql?
Thanks
I don't know what's wrong with SQL2000 setup, the problem is:
whenever I execute a query with a date/time such as 02/02/200,
SQL give me an error message saying that the date is "Out of Range".
Any ideas, thanks in advance.
I'm having trouble with something and I was hoping that you could point me in the right direction.
Here's the scenario:
I have a VB application that clients use to add records to a SQK 2K DB. The info they have added that day is shown in a grid. They have the ability to edit items in the grid, and then update those changes to the database. The problem is that sometimes they change the values to something they shouldn't. To combat this I've started experimenting with check constraints. In query analyzer I test the constraint by trying to update an entry to an 'illegal' value. When I do this, I get an error saying: "Server: Msg 547, Level 16, State 1, Line 1" and the change is not made. What I'd like to do is to give the user a dialog box notifying him of the error. Is there a way to have a sub-routine or stored procedure be triggered when a message of this type is generated?
My specs are: W2K pro clients, SQL2K on an NT4 sp6a server. Application is written in VB6.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
thanks,
-scott
I have a select statement that works, but I know there has to be a better
way( I apologize for being TSQL brain dead today). Here is the statement
SELECT PATIENT_ACPT_STATUS, DISP_NOTES, RECORD_ID, modified_by, last_name, ddate
FROM PATIENT_MEDICATION_DISPERSAL_
Where (ddate = convert(char(10),getdate(),101) and
(MODIFIED_BY = CURRENT_USER) and
rec_status = 1) or
(ddate = convert(char(10),getdate(),101) and
(PATIENT_ACPT_STATUS = 1)) OR
(ddate = convert(char(10),getdate(),101) and
(MODIFIED_BY = 'open'))
Hi All,
We have got a new HP server and SQL is preinstalled, But when we are trying to start SQL, it gives an error "The handle is invalid".
We tried to reinstall the SQL, but , being a server t doesn't allow to do so
Please assist.
regards,
Jatin
I have a need when a Update, Insert or Delete is done to a record in DB "A", it will send the appropriate UID to a different table in different DB "B".
My first thought was to have a trigger on the table in DB "A" simply call a stored procedure on DB "B" and do the UID.
However - my question is what is the best approach and what's the best way to establish the connection to DB "B" for the UID from within DB "A"? We can't use linked servers - DNSLESS string would be the preferred connect way. Not sure how to execute it within a trigger.
Is even using a Trigger to Stored Proc the best way?
What about Transaction Replication - which I've never attempted - is that a better way?
Just looking for some guidance here so I don't needlessly burn time down a path that isn't recommended or simply won't work.
Thanks as always for your input,
Peter
Hi,
I build a local cube from a relation database. In the database there are 1:n relations.
Is there a way to handle 1:n relations?
For example:
I have a table LOGGEDFLAW and a table LOGGEDREASON with a 1:n relation between them. We create a select statement of these tables and as an result we get duplicate records of LOGGEDFLAW each time more than 1 record of LOGGEDREASON are associated to 1 record of LOGGEDFLAW - this is the standard result I get with an relational JOIN operation. Now I want to count the LOGGEDFLAWs without the duplicates generated by the 1:n relationship.
Best regards,
Thorsten
Hi All,
Please help me out how to implement the locking in below scenario
Req -
There are two tables Table1 & Table2
If I will insert in table1 then related data fields will be auto updated in table2 , similarly based on the data in table2 table1 data needs to be updated.
Now the sync of table1 & table2 is working fine.
My prob is we are handling the updation/insertion from the UI screens . Two separate screen for each table. When we have multiple user accessing the screens say - User1 updates table1 and User2 updates table2 then we need to implement the locking so that at one time one screen will allow updation in the table1 and hence table2.
The other screen shouldnt allow updation in table2 and hence in table1.
This is very common locking functionality ...but am not getting any way to implement it , Please advise.
Srain.