Working With Backward Compatibility
Apr 12, 2007
Microsoft Authority,
As our application is going to be closed in few months and for testing purpose
we decided to continue running dts packages in SQL server 2005. As part of upgrade we are migrating all others( Databases, OLAP and Reporting Services). We have created SSAS 2005 cubes which we want to process using Analysis Services 2000 Processing Task in DTS. Is this possible? If not possible, Our organization need a confirmation from a Microsoft manual that it cannot.
The link about backward compatibility describes about using SQL 2005 datasources in DTS and editing Analysis Services Processing Task with SQL Server 2000 Analysis Services installed. However it does not mention anything about support for processing SSAS 2005 cubes with the help of Analysis Services 2000 Processing task. Would you please provide a link which gives a description about this.
Many Thanks in advance for assistance..
Subhash Subramanyam
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 4, 2006
I know my problem is not directly associated w/ SSIS, so please forgive the post here. I figured this would be the "most" appropriate place to post this challenge.
We're attempting to edit a 2000 DTS package in Design mode from within the 2005 SQL Management Studio. To do this we downloaded/installed the following packages from the MS download site:
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 DTS Designer Components
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Backward Compatibility Components
We're able to open the package in design mode from the Management Studio (Server > Management > Legacy > Data Transformation Services > DTS Package Name). But, when the DTS designer is open, the backspace and arrow keys won't respond in the Management Studio. They begin responding when we close the DTS designer. There are no error messages when we close the DTS designer.
Does anyone know of a fix or a workaround? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Mike
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2007
I get the impression that osql (or somewhere in the sql processing) precompiles the entire script before it executes anything. In particular, this is a problem because it means you can't use IF statements to bracket new features in a script designed to be run on both old and new versions of SQL Server. I'm trying to handle an issue whereby I need to use "CREATE LOGIN" on SQL Server 2005 because I need to set CHECK_POLICY = OFF, and you can't do that with sp_addlogin. However, on SQL Server 2000, while I can't use CREATE LOGIN, I don't need to because the default password policy is such that the password being used does not fail without it (as it does in SQL Server 2005, and is why we need to set CHECK_POLICY), so I can simply use sp_addlogin to create the user w/o a CHEC_POLICY setting.
It appears however, due to the way that SQL is processed, it is impossible to create an SQL script of this nature that will work under both SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005. I added code to check the Product Version, and can successfully bracket the code necessary with IF statements, but even though the IF statement would cause the CREATE LOGIN code to not be executed on SQL Server 2000, it errors anyway apparently because it is preparsing the script and of course, SQL Server 2000 doesn't have CREATE LOGIN. Consequently, checking Product Version is useless in this case. It looks like we'll have to do the version check outside of SQL and invoke script A for SQL Server 2000 and script B for SQL Server 2005.
Unless that is, I misunderstand the error I get from SQL Server 2000, or if there's some other way to compatibly do such a conditional. Here's an example script that runs fine under SQL Server 2005:
---------------
declare @ProductVersion as integer
set @ProductVersion = cast(left(cast(serverproperty('productversion')
as varchar(30)),1) as integer)
print 'Product Version = ' + cast(@ProductVersion as char)
IF @ProductVersion < 9 exec sp_addlogin 'testuser', 'fubar', 'master'
IF @ProductVersion > 8
BEGIN
CREATE LOGIN testuser WITH PASSWORD = 'fubar',
CHECK_POLICY = OFF, DEFAULT_DATABASE = [master]
END
----------------
On SQL Server 2000, @ProductVersion gets set to 8, but I get the following error:
Msg 170, Level 15, State 1, Server TESTSVR, Line 10
Line 10: Incorrect syntax near 'LOGIN'.
Any thoughts?
--
Sync
--
Sync
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 1999
Does anyone know if the enhanced data types (character length up to 8,000 bytes for some types) and the increase in the number of tables used in joins are available when using the 65 backward compatibility mode?
Many thanks in advance...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2006
We have our custom install code using C# for a huge Client desktop application. We package SQL Express 2005 along with Backward Compatibility pack as this application was using MSDE before and at 11th hour management decided to pack SQL Express and backward compatibility pack.
During installation we want to detect if the Backward compatibility pack is already installed to avoid overwrite. Can anyone suggest how to detect if Backward compatibility pack is already installed using C#? I am sure there should be some registery keys to look for but don't know which.
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 25, 2005
Hello all,i'm moving all my development to the new 2005/Fw2 environment.Now, i have an MSSQL 2005 server on the development server. To restore an existing database, i've created a new database with MSSQL 2000 compatibility level, and i've restored the backup over it. Everything seems ok, but when i try to create a diagram, i get the following error message:"Database diagram support objects cannot be installed because the database does not have a valid owner. To continue, first use the Files page of the Database Properties dialog box or the ALTER AUTHORIZATION statement to set the database owner to a valid login, then add the database diagram support objects."I've checked the properties and there seems to be the right owner (sa). If i create a new database with 2005 compatibility level, everithing works fine.Where is the problem?Also, a side question: by setting compatibility level to 2000, is it correct that the database can be deployed to a 2000 Server environment with no problems?Thanks in advance for any advice. -LV
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2006
Not sure if this gets fixed on a restart, but the Backward Compatibility upgrade/piece failed on service pack 1 install for SQL Server 2005. Here is the log output. Anyone experience this?
05/19/2006 08:58:27.648 ================================================================================
05/19/2006 08:58:27.648 Hotfix package launched
05/19/2006 09:00:04.368 Attempting to install instance: SQL Server Native Client
05/19/2006 09:00:04.383 Attempting to install target: CLARITY
05/19/2006 09:00:04.383 Attempting to install file: sqlncli.msi
05/19/2006 09:00:04.399 Attempting to install file: \<server>s$917f50731dade382ab1bHotFixSqlncliFilessqlncli.msi
05/19/2006 09:00:04.399 Creating MSI install log file at: C:WINDOWSHotfixRedist9LogsRedist9_Hotfix_KB913090_sqlncli.msi.log
05/19/2006 09:00:04.415 Successfully opened registry key: SoftwarePoliciesMicrosoftWindowsInstaller
05/19/2006 09:00:04.415 Failed to read registry key: Debug
05/19/2006 09:00:51.040 MSP returned 3010: A restart is required to complete the install. This message is indicative of a success. This does not include installs where the ForceReboot action is run. This error code is not available on Windows Installer version 1.0.
05/19/2006 09:00:51.118 Successfully opened registry key: SoftwarePoliciesMicrosoftWindowsInstaller
05/19/2006 09:00:51.118 Failed to read registry key: Debug
05/19/2006 09:00:51.118 Pending reboot, successfully installed file: \<server>s$917f50731dade382ab1bHotFixSqlncliFilessqlncli.msi
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Successfully installed target: <SERVER>
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Successfully installed instance: SQL Server Native Client
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Product Status Summary:
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Product: SQL Server Native Client
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 SQL Server Native Client (RTM ) - Reboot Required
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Product: Setup Support Files
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Setup Support Files (RTM ) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Product: Database Services
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Database Services (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Reporting Services (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Product: Notification Services
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Notification Services (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Product: Integration Services
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Integration Services (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Product: Client Components
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Client Components (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Product: MSXML 6.0 Parser
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 MSXML 6.0 Parser (RTM ) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Product: SQLXML4
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 SQLXML4 (RTM ) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Product: Backward Compatibility
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Backward Compatibility (RTM ) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.181
05/19/2006 09:00:51.181 Product: Microsoft SQL Server VSS Writer
05/19/2006 09:00:51.181 Microsoft SQL Server VSS Writer (RTM ) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.181
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2007
Hi, pls can anyone help me out with this? I'm installing SQL2005 SP2 over an Itanium machine with W2003 SP2 but it keeps on failing on those features. Client components got installed with no problems. I've installed SQL2005-SP2 over x86 and x64 (not Itanium) machines many times before successfuly. I've been investigating this issue for several days with no luck so I'm a bit clueless at the moment. As I'm using Administrator account I think it is not file permission related.
Summary says "Unable to install Windows Installer MSP file".
let me know if further info is nedeed.
Many thanks.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2007
We have two different machines in different locations running SQL2000. One was upgraded to SQL2005. The problem is we can't upgrade the other at the moment cause it is running SBS2003 (requires alot more planning), But we would like to get information from the computer running SQL2005. Is there a patch that can be obtained so that we can open the database created using SQL2005 in SQL2000? We desperately need the database and upgrading to SQL2005 with SBS2003 is not straight forward.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 29, 2007
Hi,
I get the following error.
Err.Description - "Rowset does not support fetching backward."
Err. Number - -2147217884
Can somebody tell me the reason behind this error.
My Reasearch: I have got to know that I get this error in the line of code recordset.MoveLast in My code.
My Code environment: I have built an SQL Query string which calls the Strored procedure with one parameter (parameter tyoe is string type). I have attached the SP code below.
and SP contains the call for querying other database in the same server using OPENQUERY command.
and the VB code contains code as Recordset.MoveLast. (Error is generated here and Recordset.RecordCount is also -1)
SP code is:
Code Block
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_RMS]
@sRMS_Status CHAR(12)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @sSQL VARCHAR (1000)
SET @sSQL = '''SELECT *
FROM VW_JOKE
WHERE JOKE_ID = ''' + '''' + @sRMS_Status + '''' +
''' ORDER BY JOKE_NO''
EXEC ( 'SELECT * FROM OPENQUERY(lnk_joke__cat,' + @sSQL + ')' )
END
My Questions:
1). Is there any problem in SP as I am using OpenQuery? I queries the SP and concluded that it generates result properly.
2). Is there any problem with the Recordset.MoveLast line? I am using adOpenKeyset, adLockReadOnly as parameters to my Recordset.Open command along with other parameters.
Let me know the corrective steps to be taken to get rid of this error.
Thanks in Advance for your valuable time
Ranjan Jain
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2008
how to generate date backward from end to start
like this
begin
-- loop to insert date backward
while
@end_date>=@start_Date
begin
INSERT INTO @tb_temp
from middle of the month to end of the month
serial date
------------------------------
1 19/03/2008
2 18/03/2008
3 17/03/2007
..............
19 01/03/2007
and put it in this part of code
tnx
Code BlockDECLARE
List_of_emp CURSOR FOR
SELECT
emp.empId,emp.ShiftType,emp.StartDate,emp.EndDate FROM @empList emp
OPEN
List_of_emp
FETCH
List_of_emp INTO @input_empID , @last_shift_id ,@StartDate,@EndDate
SET @current = @StartDate
-----------------
-- loop on all in the list
while
@@Fetch_Status = 0
begin
-- loop to insert info of emp shifts
while
@current<=@EndDate
begin
INSERT INTO @empShifts ([empID],[ShiftDate],[ShiftType],[StartDate] ,[EndDate])
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 9, 2005
I'm relatively new to SQL Server. I have spent some time in Enterprise Manager for our SQL Server 2000 instances. We are testing SQL Server 2005, and I found that I was able to register 2000 databases into the new SQL Server 2005 Management Studio.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2008
need help on logical SELECT cycle
Code Snippet
SELECT empID, unit_date, unit, ISNULL(NULLIF ((unit + DATEDIFF(mm, unit_date, GETDATE())) % 4, 0), 4) AS new_unit
FROM dbo.empList
i have this code
this code change the value field "new_unit" evry month from 1 > 2 > 3 > 4
like this evry 4 month it return to 1 >2..........
------------------------------------------
if i put
unit_date = 01/05/2008
and unit=1
than new_unit=1
IT OK
but
if i put
unit_date = 01/04/2008
and unit=1
than i get new_unit=2
but it should be 3
it dont go backward ok
if i put
unit_date = 01/06/2008
and unit=1
than i get new_unit=4
but it should be 2
it dont go forward ok !
TNX
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2007
I have used SSRS since the original SQL 2000 beta, so am pretty experienced with it.
I think there may be a bug in V2.0 (2005) that did not exist in V1.0:
Have just started cutting over my V1.0 reports to V2.0 (2005). One of my users today showed me that the "Find" feature within a V2.0 report searches forward fine. In one case, a three page report, it found the first item on the third page. However, when the "Find" feature was used from that point to get something on the first page, a message was received that it could not find the item. After manually navigating back to page one, and re-entering the same data in "Find" from there, it found the data with no problem on page one.
Has anyone else seen this behavior?
Thanks, Tim
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 22, 2006
I am running a SQL Server 2000 enterprise default instance and SQL Server 2005 standard named instances on a machine. I uninstalled the default instance and tried to instance 2005 but was unable to with the error:
'an installation packages for the product Microsoft SQL Server Backward Compatibility cannot be found. Try the installation again using a valid copy of the installation packages sqlserver2005_bc.msi'
I have tried to repair the backward compatibility currently installed and have also tried runing the msi file again but it will not install.
I have also put back 2000 as the default instance. then tried to apply sp1 to the 2005 named instances and i cannot do that either. anyone have any ideas?
Thank you.
'
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2008
need help how to
change the shift order in my stord prosege backward
on the field "shifttype"
not like this
shifttype
---------------------------------------------------------
111111 2008-02-24 Sunday 1
111111 2008-02-23 Saturday 2
111111 2008-02-22 Friday 3
111111 2008-02-21 Thursday 4
111111 2008-02-20 Wednesday 5
111111 2008-02-19 Tuesday 6
111111 2008-02-18 Monday 7
111111 2008-02-17 Sunday 8
111111 2008-02-16 Saturday 1
111111 2008-02-15 Friday 2
111111 2008-02-14 Thursday 3
111111 2008-02-13 Wednesday 4
111111 2008-02-12 Tuesday 5
111111 2008-02-11 Monday 6
111111 2008-02-10 Sunday 7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i need it like this
shifttype
------------------------------------------------------
111111 2008-02-24 Sunday 8
111111 2008-02-23 Saturday 7
111111 2008-02-22 Friday 6
111111 2008-02-21 Thursday 5
111111 2008-02-20 Wednesday 4
111111 2008-02-19 Tuesday 3
111111 2008-02-18 Monday 2
111111 2008-02-17 Sunday 1
111111 2008-02-16 Saturday 8
111111 2008-02-15 Friday 7
111111 2008-02-14 Thursday 6
111111 2008-02-13 Wednesday 5
111111 2008-02-12 Tuesday 4
111111 2008-02-11 Monday 3
111111 2008-02-10 Sunday 2
Code Snippet
if object_ID('tempdb..#emplist','U')<>0
Drop Table #emplist
if object_ID('tempdb..#empshifts','U')<>0
Drop Table #empshifts
go
declare @g datetime
select @g=getdate()
CREATE table #empList (
[empID] int NOT NULL,
[ShiftType] int NULL,
[StartDate] datetime NOT NULL,
[EndDate] datetime NOT NULL
)
INSERT INTO #empList ([empID], [ShiftType],[StartDate],[EndDate])
SELECT 111111,1,CONVERT(DATETIME, '01/01/2008', 103), CONVERT(DATETIME, '27/02/2009', 103) UNION ALL
SELECT 222222,2,CONVERT(DATETIME, '01/01/2008', 103),CONVERT(DATETIME, '27/02/2009', 103)UNION ALL
SELECT 333333,3,CONVERT(DATETIME, '01/01/2008', 103), CONVERT(DATETIME, '27/02/2009', 103)UNION ALL
SELECT 444444,4,CONVERT(DATETIME, '01/01/2008', 103), CONVERT(DATETIME, '27/02/2009', 103)UNION ALL
SELECT 555555,5,CONVERT(DATETIME, '01/01/2008', 103),CONVERT(DATETIME, '27/02/2009', 103)
-- create shifts table
CREATE table #empShifts (
[empID] numeric(18, 0) NOT NULL,
[ShiftDate] datetime NOT NULL,
[ShiftType] int NULL ,
[startingShiftType] int not null
)
create unique clustered index uc_empshifts on #empshifts(empid,shiftdate DESC)
declare @curr_employee int
declare @shift_id int
declare @dummyShift int
declare @dummyEmp int
--start by populating the dates into the @empshifts table
insert #empshifts (
empid,
shiftdate,
[startingShiftType]
)
select
empid,
dateadd(day,-1*spt.number,Enddate),
shifttype
from #empList cross join
master..spt_values spt
where
spt.type='P'
and spt.number<=datediff(day, startdate,enddate)
--now set up the shifts as the cursor solution did
select @shift_id=0, @curr_employee=0
update e
set
@shift_ID=shiftType=(case when @curr_employee=empid then @shift_ID else startingShiftType end -1 +
CASE WHEN @shift_id in ( 1,2,3) and DATENAME (dw,ShiftDate )='Friday' then 0
WHEN @shift_id= 8 and DATENAME (dw,ShiftDate )='Saturday' then 0
else 1 end)%8+1,
@dummyshift=@shift_ID,
@curr_employee =empid,
@dummyemp=@curr_employee
from #empshifts e WITH (index(uc_empshifts),TABLOCK) OPTION (MAXDOP 1)
--show the results
select empid,shiftdate, DATENAME (dw,ShiftDate ),shifttype from #empshifts
--select datediff(ms,@g,getdate())
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2008
I'm trying to upgrade from the SCE 3.0 server tools to the 3.5 server tools. I've uninstalled the 3.0 tools and while trying to install the 3.5 tools I get an error on the IIS requirement indicating that with IIS 7.0 I need to install the backward compatibily components and can not proceed with the install.
Searching Microsoft I get hits that mention the IIS backward compatibility components, but no links on where to download them. This might be a useful link to add to the sticky with the downloads for SCE 3.5. Also, one of the requirements referneces on the SCE3.5 server tools download, indicates that the backward IIS compatibility components were supported on 32 bit OSs, no mention of 64; this also has me concerened.
I'm running Visual Studio 2008 and SQL Server 2005 on my workstation. My device has SCE 2.0, 3.0 & 3.5 on it; these all are working fine. I'm trying to upgrade everything to 3.5 so I can get rid of prior versions. From within VS2008 I can connect to SCE3.5 SDFs and have updated a couple of databases to 3.5. What I want to do is connect to the 3.5 SDFs from SQL Server 2005; which is why I am trying to install the server tools.
I've got SQL 2008 installed on a VM and am able to connect to 3.5 SDFs but I'm trying to avoid the hassle of firing the VM and schlepping files across the VM boundary to work with the 3.5 SDFs. It's becoming a pain. Which is why I am trying to install the server tools.
Is there a resolution to this? Can I get the server tools installed on a 64 bit Vista box? Is there a link for the backward compatibility tools?
Steve
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2008
need help
help me -CURSOR backward insert from End Date > to Start Date
how to insert dates from end to start
like this
SELECT 111111,1,CONVERT(DATETIME, '17/03/2008', 103), CONVERT(DATETIME, '01/03/2008'
i explain i have stord prosege that create mod cycle shift pattern
and it working ok
now i need to overturned the insert so the first insert is the '17/03/2008' to '16/03/2008' ..15...14..13..12...2...1
so the first insert be '17/03/2008' next '16/03/2008' ...........................01/03/2008
tnx
Code Block
DECLARE
@shifts_pattern TABLE ([PatternId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1 ) NOT NULL, [patternShiftValue] [int]NOT NULL)
declare
@I int
set
@i=0
while
@i < 5
BEGIN
INSERT INTO @shifts_pattern ([patternShiftValue] )
SELECT 1 UNION ALL
SELECT 2 UNION ALL
SELECT 3 UNION ALL
SELECT 4 UNION ALL
SELECT 5 UNION ALL
SELECT 6 UNION ALL
SELECT 7 UNION ALL
SELECT 8
set
@i=@i+1
end
declare
@empList
TABLE
( [empID] [numeric](18, 0) NOT NULL,[ShiftType] [int]NULL,[StartDate][datetime]NOT NULL,[EndDate] [datetime] NOT NULL)
INSERT INTO
@empList ([empID], [ShiftType],[StartDate],[EndDate])
SELECT 111111,1,CONVERT(DATETIME, '01/01/2008', 103), CONVERT(DATETIME, '17/01/2008', 103)
-- create shifts table
declare
@empShifts
TABLE ( [empID] [numeric](18, 0) NOT NULL,[ShiftDate] [datetime]NOT NULL,[ShiftType] [int]NULL ,[StartDate] [datetime]NOT NULL,[EndDate] [datetime]NOT NULL)
DECLARE
@StartDate datetime
DECLARE
@EndDate datetime
Declare
@current datetime
DEclare
@last_shift_id int
Declare
@input_empID int
----------------- open list table for emp with curser
DECLARE
List_of_emp CURSOR FOR
SELECT
emp.empId,emp.ShiftType,emp.StartDate,emp.EndDate FROM @empList emp
OPEN
List_of_emp
FETCH
List_of_emp INTO @input_empID , @last_shift_id ,@StartDate,@EndDate
SET @current = @StartDate
-----------------
-- loop on all emp in the list
while
@@Fetch_Status = 0
begin
-- loop to insert info of emp shifts
while
@current<=@EndDate
begin
INSERT INTO @empShifts ([empID],[ShiftDate],[ShiftType],[StartDate] ,[EndDate])
select @input_empID ,@current,shift .patternShiftValue ,@StartDate,@EndDate
from @shifts_pattern as shift where PatternId=@last_shift_id+1
-- if it is Friday and we are on one of the first shift we don't move to next shift type .
if (DATENAME(dw ,@current) = 'Friday' ) and
EXISTS(select ShiftType from @empShifts where ShiftDate=@current and empID= @input_empID and ShiftType in ( 1,2,3))
-- do nothing
--set @last_shift_id=@last_shift_id
print ('friday first shift')
ELSE
set @last_shift_id=@last_shift_id+ 1
set @current=DATEADD( d,1, @current)
end
FETCH
List_of_emp INTO @input_empID ,@last_shift_id,@StartDate,@EndDate
-- init of start date for the next emp
set
@current = @StartDate
end
CLOSE
List_of_emp
DEALLOCATE
List_of_emp
select
empID,shiftDate,DATENAME (dw,shift.ShiftDate ), shiftType from @empShifts as shift
RETURN
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2006
hi
I had a view in which I did something like this
isnull(fld,val) as 'alias'
when I assign a value to this in the client (vb 6.0) it works ok in sql2000 but fails in 2005.
When I change the query to fld as 'alias' then it works ok in sql 2005 .
why ?? I still have sql 2000 (8.0) compatability.
Also some queries which are pretty badly written run on sql 2000 but dont run at all in sql 2005 ???
any clues or answers ?? it is some configuration issue ?
Thanks in advance.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2002
Is it possible to backup databases from a 7.0 box and restore them to as MSSQL 2k box? My question really is this: Does it matter what type of MSSQL server your database resides on or can a dump be created of a database, restored to a different version MSSQL server, and used interchangeably?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 29, 2007
Can CE open .mdf files??
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2005
Hi all,I am under the impression that one can not Log Ship from enterprise edition to standard edition. Anyone have any documentation they can point me to?TIA,SQLPoet
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2007
Hi Gurus,
I would like to know if I put the Compatibility Level in a SQL Server 2005 installation to 70 I can make afirmation that I have a full SQL Server 7.0. If the answer is "Yes" where I can find a documentation or a FAQ that explained this topic.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2007
Has anyone changed compatibility level from 80 to 90? Did you have any problems?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2008
I restored the database from SQL server 2000 to 2005.The database was restored with 80 compatibility.Can i change it to 90 and what are the effects? Coz my applications are pulling data from SQL server 2000. Does 80 work for database mirroring?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2008
Hi there
We found interesting issue which is basically the app is being tested ok on SQL2005 by software vendor. Then we tested in our environment and we found it's not truly true. There are some compatibility issue on SQL syntax. Anyway ... the plan set the compatibility level back to 80 instead 90. Cause this thing for sure is working.
Now my question is do you know any other impacts that you know of if we are doing this setting (running SQLServer 2005 but the database set as 80)? I know that some inbuilt reporting only run 90 level but I can get around this. Performance or something? Is there any thing that I should to know?
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2008
Is there a function / SP which gives ONLY the current compatibility setting of a DB.
I know sp_helpdb can do that; but sp_helpdb returns lot more information. I need this to create a script.
------------------------
I think, therefore I am - Rene Descartes
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2006
Hi,
What are the limitations of using the automated conversion tool and how to deal with compatability issues?
Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2007
Does SQL Server Compact Edition fully support ADO.NET?
Will SQL Server Compact Edition fully support the ADO.NET Entity Framework?
Will SQL Server Compact Edition fully support LINQ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2006
To your knowledge, is there any performance hit with SQL 2005 when you set a database to a lower compatibility mode. IE from 9.0 to 7.0
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2007
Hi there,
Correct me please if I'm wrong but one should not get any issues while restoring a database backup from a sql 2005 development edition to an enteprise edition or even from a sql express edition to whatever else?
I was under the impression that a sql 2005 database, no matter what edition, would work on all the other 2005 server editions/versions and hence, the backups from these databases should also work on the others.
Regards
Mike
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2006
I was hoping someone could help me or put me on the right path to re-writing the join portion of this sql query in ANSI form for compatibility level 90. Im just not sure how to handle the three join statements and if they should go at the top in the FROM statement (dont know if that would mess up the rows produced). The query exists inside a stored proc.
SELECT
S.TYPE,
S.LOCATION_TYPE,
S.LOCATION_ID,
S.PLANNED_ARRIVAL,
S.PROJECTED_ARRIVAL,
S.ACTUAL_ARRIVAL,
S.PLANNED_DEPARTURE,
S.PROJECTED_DEPARTURE,
S.ACTUAL_DEPARTURE
FROM TAB1 S, TAB2 RL, TAB LS
WHERE
S.LOAD_ID = @V_CURRENTLOADID AND
(RL.REGION_ID = @REGION_ID AND
RL.ROUTE_DATE = @ROUTE_DATE AND
RL.ROUTE_ID = @ROUTE_ID) AND
(S.REGION_ID = RL.REGION_ID AND
S.ROUTE_DATE = RL.ROUTE_DATE AND
S.ROUTE_ID = RL.ROUTE_ID) AND
(S.LOCATION_ID =* LS.LOAD_LOCATION_ID AND
S.LOAD_ID =* LS.LOAD_ID AND
S.LOAD_STOP_ID =* LS.LOAD_STOP_ID)
ORDER BY RL.SEQ_NUM, S.ACTUAL_SEQUENCE_NUM;
Any help would be greatly appreciated
View 8 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2006
just a question....
my web project is using SQL Express2005 and ASP.NET and C#.
my
web hosting company only have MSsql2000. would there be any conflict
with regards to my database? im sorry if i sound dumb. im a newbie to
this.
thanks a lot!
View 9 Replies
View Related
