How do I find the average size of a row in a table? I need to calculate a row size in a number of tables, then sum those to find the average size of one record ( a hotel guest in this case), which includes entries in a dozen tables.
Thanks
I want to find out the average rwo size of a table in sql server 2000. How can i achive this requirment? Please let me know how can i do this?
Thanks & regards,
Dishant Sharma
I want to calculate average row size of a record. By based on this i want to add some more columns into an existing table. Here is my table structureCREATE TABLE patient_procedure( proc_id int IDENTITY(1,1) CONSTRAINT proc_id_pri_key PRIMARY KEY, patient_id int NULL, surgeon_name varchar(40) NOT NULL, proc_name varchar(20) , part_name varchar(30), wth_contrast int , wthout_contrast int , wth_wthout_contrast int, xray_part varchar(60), arth_area varchar(30), others varchar(30) , cpt varchar(20) , procedure_date smalldatetime NOT NULL, mraloperrun varchar(20),CONSTRAINT patientid_foreign_key FOREIGN KEY(patient_id) REFERENCES dbo.patient_information (Patient_id)) Now i got a requirement that i have to add two more procedures with different columns.The columns overall size is 195 bytes.I can place those two procedures as seperate tables. I dont want to do that becuase of front end requirements.Here the problem is when the user enters these two procedures information remaining fields will store the null value. I know that when we store the null values into corresponding columns min of 1 byte will be occupied. Please suggest me that shall i include these columns into the above table. If i add these columns is performance will be decreased or not. Waiting for valuable suggestions.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIt is possible to find table size and in that table each row size.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCalculation of an average using DAX' AVERAGE and AVERAGEX.This is the manual calculation in DW, using SQL.In the tabular project (we're i've noticed that these 4 %'s are in itself strange), in a 1st moment i've noticed that i would have to divide by 100 to get the same values as in the DW, so i've used AVERAGEX:
Avg_AMP:=AVERAGEX('Fct Sales';'Fct Sales'[_AMP]/100)
Avg_AMPdollar:=AVERAGEX('Fct Sales';'Fct Sales'[_AMPdollar]/100)
Avg_FMP:=AVERAGEX('Fct Sales';'Fct Sales'[_FMP]/100)
Avg_FMPdollar:=AVERAGEX('Fct Sales';'Fct Sales'[_FMPdollar]/100)
The results were, respectively: 701,68; 2120,60...; -669,441; and  finally **-694,74** for Avg_FMPdollar.i can't understand the difference to SQL calculation, since calculations are similar to the other ones. After that i've tried:
test:=SUM([_FMPdollar])/countrows('Fct Sales') AND the value was EQUAL to SQL: -672,17
test2:=AVERAGE('Fct Sales'[_Frontend Margin Percent ACY]), and here, without dividing by 100 in the end, -696,74...
So, AVERAGE and AVERAGEX have a diferent behaviour from the SUM divided by COUNTROWS, and even more strange, test2 doesn't need the division by 100 to be similar to AVERAGEX result.
I even calculated the number of blanks and number of zeros on each column, could it be a difference on the denominator (so, a division by a diferente number of rows), but they are equal on each row.
I have two tables, table a holds all the votes by users of each element in table b. I was wondering, how do I get the average of all those votes in table a that relate to that each instance of a element in table b. For example table b has two elements created by a certain user that has been voted 5 times each by users with scores like 2, 5, 4, 2 , 2 for both of them. I just need to get the average of those numbers that pertain to those elements in table b. Thanks for any help.
View 4 Replies View Relatedhow to average the best X of Y records in a table for each member. Here's what I have for columns:
Member_ID
Year
Month
MonthlySpend (summary value for month)
Basically, I'm trying to find out the average monthly spend for each member's best 4 of the last 6 months (the best months will vary by member of course). I thought this would be simple (and maybe it is) but I am having difficulty figuring this out. I'm using MS SQL 2000.
So I have this table called "listings"... there are 100 unique listings with an integer ID for each.
I have another table called "ratings"... in there are multiple entries that have a listing_id field and a rating field. The rating field is a value from 0-10.
I want to select ALL "listings" from the listings table... and then sort based on the average number that the multiple rating fields in the ratings table has for that listing.
I CAN NOT figure it out!! Any help would be greatly appreciated. Please respond if I have not explained this properly. Thanks in advance.
I have a temp_max column and a temp_min column with data for every day for 60 years. I want the average temp for jan of yr1 through yr60, averaged...
I.E. the avg temp for Jan of yr1 is 20 and the avg temp for Jan of yr2 is 30, then the overall average is 25.
The complexity lies within calculating a daily average by month, THEN a yearly average by month, in one statement.
?confused?
Here's the original query.
accept platformId CHAR format a6 prompt 'Enter Platform Id (capital letters in ''): '
SELECT name, country_cd from weather_station where platformId=&&platformId;
SELECT to_char(datetime,'MM') as MO, max(temp_max) as max_T, round(avg((temp_max+temp_min)/2),2) as avg_T, min(temp_min) as min_temTp, count(unique(to_char(datetime, 'yyyy'))) as TOTAL_YEARS
FROM daily
WHERE platformId=&&platformId and platformId = platformId and platformId = platformId and datetime=datetime and datetime=datetime
GROUP BY to_char(datetime,'MM')
ORDER BY to_char(datetime,'MM');
with a result of:
NAME_________________CO
-------------------- --
OFFUTT AFB___________US
MO______MAX_T _____AVG_T__MIN_TEMTP_TOTAL_YEARS
-- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
01_________21______-5.31________-30__________60
02_________26______-2.19______-28.3__________61
03_______31.1_______3.61______-26.1__________60
04_______35.6______11.07______-12.2__________60
05_______37.2_______17.2_______-3.3__________60
06_______41.1______22.44__________5__________60
07_______43.3______24.92________7.2__________60
08_______40.6______23.71________5.6__________60
09_________40______18.84_______-2.2__________59
10_______34.4_______12.5_______-8.9__________59
11_________29_______4.13______-23.9__________60
12_________21______-2.52______-28.3__________60
I need to figure out the correct update statement syntax for the following integration.
I have a "Performance Table" which i insert weekly performance numbers into for each store. The table is constructed w/ columns such as Store, Weekenddate, Sales, Refunds, #ofPatients
In a "Averages Table" i have every weekenddate for each store populated. So 52 Weeks for 10 stores = 520 Rows of Store numbers & WeekendDates.
What i would like to do is run a loop or update statement which would update the store average for each weekendate based on the last 13 weeks.
This is my query
update performancestore_avgs set SalesAvg =
(select sum(SalesHit)/Count(Store) from performance_store where performance_store.weekenddate >= performancestore_avgs.weekenddate-84 and performancestore_Avgs.store = performance_store.store)
The update statement runs but the averages are completely wrong.
Hi,I'm am looking for a little help. I need to create a SQL view whichjoins a few tables, and I need to return an average for a particularcolumn where a second duplicate ID exists...Heres an example of how the results could be returned...ID | Name | Order No. | Value---+------+-----------+---------5 | test | 1234 | 35 | test2| 1234 | 45 | test3| 1234 | 35 | void | 1235 | 55 | void2| 1235 | 65 | void3| 1235 | 55 | void4| 1235 | 7ID is my main join which joins the tablesName is a unique nameOrder No is the same for the different names, I only need to return onerow with this order no, and the first name (the rest are irrelevant)Value is the field which I wish to return as an average of all 3, 4 orhowever many rows is returned and share the same order no. This iswhere I get totally lost as I am pretty new to SQL. Can anyone provideany help on how I would go about limiting this query to the uniqueorder no's and returning the average of the value field, and I can takeit from there with my own tables.Thanks for your helpstr8
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi,
i use this script that show me the size of each table and do the sum of all the table size.
SELECT
X.[name],
REPLACE(CONVERT(varchar, CONVERT(money, X.[rows]), 1), '.00', '') AS [rows],
REPLACE(CONVERT(varchar, CONVERT(money, X.[reserved]), 1), '.00', '') AS [reserved],
REPLACE(CONVERT(varchar, CONVERT(money, X.[data]), 1), '.00', '') AS [data],
REPLACE(CONVERT(varchar, CONVERT(money, X.[index_size]), 1), '.00', '') AS [index_size],
REPLACE(CONVERT(varchar, CONVERT(money, X.[unused]), 1), '.00', '') AS [unused]
FROM
(SELECT
CAST(object_name(id) AS varchar(50)) AS [name],
SUM(CASE WHEN indid < 2 THEN CONVERT(bigint, [rows]) END) AS [rows],
SUM(CONVERT(bigint, reserved)) * 8 AS reserved,
SUM(CONVERT(bigint, dpages)) * 8 AS data,
SUM(CONVERT(bigint, used) - CONVERT(bigint, dpages)) * 8 AS index_size,
SUM(CONVERT(bigint, reserved) - CONVERT(bigint, used)) * 8 AS unused
FROM sysindexes WITH (NOLOCK)
WHERE sysindexes.indid IN (0, 1, 255)
AND sysindexes.id > 100
AND object_name(sysindexes.id) <> 'dtproperties'
GROUP BY sysindexes.id WITH ROLLUP) AS X
ORDER BY X.[name]
the problem is that the sum of all tables is not the same size when i make a full database backup.
example of this is when i run this query against my database i see a sum of 111,899 KB that they are 111MB,but when
i do full backup to that database the size of this full backup is 1.5GB,why is that and where this size come from?
THX
I am trying to resize a database initial log file from 500M to 2M. I€™m using€?
ALTER DATABASE <DBNAME> MODIFY FILE ( NAME = <DBLOGFILENAME, SIZE = 2 ) "
And I'm getting "MODIFY FILE failed. Specified size is less than current size." I tried going into the database properties and setting the log file to 2M, but it doesn€™t keep the changes.
Any help with this process?
I have some question and would like ask experts:
The largest table in our database eats up above 4G . we do "sp_spaceused" for this table.The length of all columns of this table ( just int, char, varchar, money ,numeric fields types) is about 200 bytes, and the table has around 1,300,000 rows, but the reserved spaced for this table is 4,800,000kb and the data space is around 4,600,00kb.
How can average each row take 3.7kb ( the total size of all columns just 200 bytes)? Any other things I need check?
Any one can give any suggestion what cause this problem? or it is normal?
Thank you very much.
Judy
Hello, Everyone,
Can anyone tell me how to find the size of a table in a DB?
Thanks,
I'm trying to run a query or sp that will give me a
list of tables and the number of rows in it.
Is there any way for me to do this?
I appreciate the assistance.
Toni
I am wondering if there is the limitation of maximum table size in SQL 6.5. I have a table with 2.6GB and 12,000,000 rows in SQL 6.5 database. Is this a problem?
TIA,
Stella Liu
Is there a practical size limit, in MB's, of a table in SQL Server 6.5?
Is there a size, that once exceeded, degrades performance signifigantly?
I am speaking of raw megabytes. The table in question will consist of only 3 int columns but has the possiblity of becoming VERY LARGE (+1,000,000 rows). I am still in the design phase and can change my strategy if this will prove to be a problem.
Thanks for any help!
hello all,
I am trying to solve this problem for quite some time.. I was wondering if I can get some help..
These questions are all abt. MSSQL 6.5
1. Is there a limit on the size of the table ?
2. Does it make sense to have more tables if the size of the row size is more that the limit set by 6.5 or i should let have more rows in a different table with duplicate entries for a particular field.
3. What is the number of rows before the performance of a query starts getting affected..
Thanks..
Sachin.
I created a same table on two different server with same data. I run sp_sapceuse on both server and I got following result
it's useing 392 MB for table
name rows reserved data index_size unused
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
DUNS_SITE 100000 401288 KB 400000 KB 1264 KB 24 KB
its using only 97.3 MB
name rows reserved data index_size unused
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
DUNS_SITE 100000 99720 KB 99376 KB 328 KB 16 KB
WHY?????
Thanks
Manesh
Hello,
How can i get the size of a table in sqserver 2000 ?
How can read a image field ?
Thanks for this answer.
Is there a maximum or optimum number of rows I should have in a table so that I can have fastest search queries. I am a novice programmer just developed something for my work place.
The database has a table created by converting data from excel spreadsheets. There were 24 spreadsheets for 12 months each having approximately 500 rows. Designed this way the table will have approximately 24 * 500 = 12000 records. Should I consider redesigning the database to make searches faster
Hi all,
How can I find the exact size in the disk occupied by a TABLE ?
When I execute "sp_spaceused" it returns the following parameters for a table
reserved
data
index_size
unused
Which of the parameters I should consider to calculate the exact space occupied by the table.
Thanks in advance,
Hari Haran Arulmozhi
Is there any way I can find the size of each table?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it better to have a table with 10,000 row or 10 tables of 100 rows?
View 8 Replies View RelatedHello,
If i want to know the size of table then how can i do it in SQL Server 2000 and in SQL Server 2005.
-- how much amount of data can a table store in sql.
-- On which thing the size of table depends.
or Can anyone give me a introduction about the size of table in sql
Hi. I am trying to get a row count of each row of each table in the database. Is that possible? Using a SP or UDFS? I dont want the column size of each table but the total datasize of each row.So for example if I have 5 rows each in 3 tables I need a query that will return 15 rows with the size of each row(size of all coumn data summed together). Thanks.
View 6 Replies View RelatedBeen digging around, I want to query the size of a table (disc size)
Anything?
Is there a way to get the size of a query of a table?
I know I can use DATALENGTH on every column in my query, but I thought there might be an easier way.
is there an easy way to query the size of a table on disc?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi all,
Is it possible to get the name and size of each index in a table? Please let me know.
Thanks in advance,
Praveena
SQL 7
I have inherited a system where several of the tables have WAY TOO MANY fields (over 255) and performance, well, you know.
I've been thinking about breaking the tables out into multiple tables and I know a view linking all these tables together can provide me with backward compatibility.
I'm wondering if a view will truely be a greater gain than leaving it alone while we redesign. hhhmmmm
Thoughts ?
Craig
Hi,
I am getting this error when I try to run a script to create a table. The error reads as below
The total row size (12488) for table exceeds the maximum number of bytes per row (8060). Rows that exceed the maximum number of bytes will not be added.
Can somebody tell me what I have done wrong?
thanks
zoey