Hey guys,
I have to import a csv file to my database and then add
some values to other fields based on these values. At present I use a
store procedure that does a bulk insert and then I use an update and
fetch inside the sql to perform these updates. I am not sure if this is
the best way. Is this bad, since some amount of busniess logic is in
the store procedure?
If it is, how can I do this better?
Thanks for the answer.
I am working with stored procedures to provide conditional business logic for a customer based on triggers. Is it possible for a stored procedure to execute an external program ie opening or distributing a crystal report?
View 9 Replies View RelatedOr maybe it can't find something it's looking for to make my additional symetrical with everything else. This is from one of my businesslogic files. What causes Visual Studio to not allow me to add something here and have it behave like the other parameters/ I'm talking about ShortDesc. Visual studio inserted () and the Get instead of GET like all the others. It would not allow me to capitalize the "get". There has to be a reason for this. Currently my program is adding all of the fields except the ShortDesc to the table in my database. Does anyone have any thoughts as to why this is the case?
#Region "Pvt Members" Private _ArticleID As System.Int32 Private _UserID As System.Int32 Private _WebSiteID As System.Int32 Private _ArticleTitle As System.String Private _Author As System.String Private _ShortDesc As System.String Private _ArticleText As System.String Private _AnchorText As System.String Private _ShowInDirectory As System.Boolean Private _Active As System.Boolean Private _DateAdded As System.DateTime#End Region#Region "Properties" Public Property ArticleID As System.Int32 GET Return _ArticleID End Get Set(ByVal Value As System.Int32) _ArticleID= Value End Set End Property Public Property UserID As System.Int32 GET Return _UserID End Get Set(ByVal Value As System.Int32) _UserID= Value End Set End Property Public Property WebSiteID As System.Int32 GET Return _WebSiteID End Get Set(ByVal Value As System.Int32) _WebSiteID= Value End Set End Property Public Property ArticleTitle As System.String GET Return _ArticleTitle End Get Set(ByVal Value As System.String) _ArticleTitle= Value End Set End Property Public Property Author As System.String GET Return _Author End Get Set(ByVal Value As System.String) _Author= Value End Set End Property Public Property ShortDesc() As System.String Get Return _ShortDesc End Get Set(ByVal value As System.String) End Set End Property Public Property ArticleText As System.String GET Return _ArticleText End Get Set(ByVal Value As System.String) _ArticleText= Value End Set End Property Public Property AnchorText As System.String GET Return _AnchorText End Get Set(ByVal Value As System.String) _AnchorText= Value End Set End Property Public Property ShowInDirectory As System.Boolean GET Return _ShowInDirectory End Get Set(ByVal Value As System.Boolean) _ShowInDirectory= Value End Set End Property Public Property Active As System.Boolean GET Return _Active End Get Set(ByVal Value As System.Boolean) _Active= Value End Set End Property Public Property DateAdded As System.DateTime GET Return _DateAdded End Get Set(ByVal Value As System.DateTime) _DateAdded= Value End Set End Property #End Region
I'm trying to implement a custom conflict resolver by inheriting from
Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.BusinessLogicSupport.BusinessLogicModule. The replication is between a SQL Server 2005 Express subscriber and a SQL Server 2005 publisher/distributer.
The problem is that the resolver class in the DLL will not load; although, it does appear to find the DLL. (If I rename the DLL I get a "file not found error"). The exact error message is:
Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.ComErrorException
"Error loading custom class "MergeConflictHandler" from custom assembly "MergeConflictHandler",
Error : "Could not load type 'MergeConflictHandler' from assembly 'MergeConflictHandler, Version=1.0.2502.22393, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=0403e50cc4dc27fa'."."}
I placed the DLL in the directory of the program that calls SynchronizationAgent.Synchronize and tried it with and without being registered in the GAC. There was no change. Interestingly, when I move the file out of that location, but register it in the GAC, the file is not found. Thinking it may be a security problem, I gave Everyone Read & Execute and Read privileges. I believe the class is actually instantiated by replmerge.exe, an apparantly unmanaged app, so I tried marking it ComVisible. No Luck.
I registered the resolver with the following T-SQL code:
sp_registercustomresolver @article_resolver = 'eClinical Notes Conflict Resolver'
, @is_dotnet_assembly = 'true'
, @dotnet_assembly_name = 'MergeConflictHandler'
, @dotnet_class_name = 'MergeConflictHandler'
, @resolver_clsid = Null
The resolver I've created is not much more than a shell at this point. It is pasted below, but I tried using the code found on MSDN character-for-character and had the same problem.
using System;
using System.Text;
using System.Data;
using System.Data.Common;
using Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.BusinessLogicSupport;
namespace MergeConflictHandler
{
public class MergeConflictHandler :
Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.BusinessLogicSupport.BusinessLogicModule
{
// Variables to hold server names.
private string m_PublisherName;
private string m_SubscriberName;
private string m_Artical_Name;
public MergeConflictHandler()
{
}
// Implement the Initialize method to get publication
// and subscription information.
public override void Initialize(string publisher, string subscriber, string distributor, string publisherDB, string subscriberDB,string articleName)
{
m_PublisherName = publisher;
m_SubscriberName = subscriber;
m_Artical_Name = articleName;
}
// Declare what types of row changes, conflicts, or errors to handle.
public override ChangeStates HandledChangeStates
{
get
{
return ChangeStates.UpdateConflicts;
}
}
public override ActionOnUpdateConflict UpdateConflictsHandler(DataSet publisherDataSet, DataSet subscriberDataSet, ref DataSet customDataSet, ref ConflictLogType conflictLogType, ref string customConflictMessage, ref int historyLogLevel, ref string historyLogMessage)
{
if (m_Artical_Name == "PatientAllergies")
{
// Accept the updated data in the Subscriber's data set and apply it to the Publisher.
}
return ActionOnUpdateConflict.AcceptPublisherData;
}
}
}
Does anyone have any thoughts or advice? (Help!)
hi,
i'm following steps described at: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms365150.aspx
all goes fine until step 6. of paragraph "To debug a business logic handler on a Web server using Web synchronization, or for a SQL Server Mobile Subscriber".
in my case when attaching to w3wp.exe i can only debug t-sql or native code. when i forcibly check 'managed' i get: "Unable to attach to the process. Access is denied". error picture:
http://img156.imageshack.us/my.php?image=debuggingerror7bp.jpg
i KNOW that the business logic handler gets loaded and executed because i am logging some info in it. i would be grateful for any suggestions.
TIA, kamil nowicki
Hi,
I am performing the Merge Replication of Timesheet table between SQL server 2005 and SQL CE on the Pocket PC. For one of the article, I would like to perform web synch for only those rows which have certain field set to true.
I am trying to use Business Logic Handler to implement this logic. I am using following code out of sample on MSDN web site. However I am not sure if this code gets executed for each row for a table during synch or does this get executed once for each table? The answer would help me write logic on applying synch changes only for few rows.
Thanks
public override ActionOnDataChange UpdateHandler(SourceIdentifier updateSource,
DataSet updatedDataSet, ref DataSet customDataSet, ref int historyLogLevel,
ref string historyLogMessage)
{
if (updateSource == SourceIdentifier.SourceIsPublisher)
{
//check the approved status of the timesheet
if (updatedDataSet.Tables["tbl_timesheets"].Rows[0]["ts_approved"] == true)
{
// Set the reference parameter to write the line to the log file.
historyLogMessage = updatedDataSet.Tables["tbl_timesheets"].Rows[0]["ts_id"].ToString();
// Set the history log level to the default verbose level.
historyLogLevel = 1;
// Accept the updated data in the Subscriber's data set and apply it to the Publisher.
return ActionOnDataChange.AcceptData;
}
else
{
return ActionOnDataChange.RejectData;
}
}
else
{
return base.UpdateHandler(updateSource, updatedDataSet,
ref customDataSet, ref historyLogLevel, ref historyLogMessage);
}
}
Any Help is appreciated.
Thanks
I guess I just don't get the reasoning behind the new SqlDataSource control. Haven't we just spent the last decade or so evangelizing and learning how and why to separate business logic from the display in VB 6 and VS.NET? In this age of programming for disparate devices (desktop, mobile, PocketPC, etc.) when this separation makes more sense than ever, why is MS pushing us to go back to putting our logic and data access rules and objects back in the display? It doesn't make sense. Why would anyone do this? And why would all the experts and MVPs at ASP.NET, DevX, 4GuysFromRolla, etc., go along with this?
View 4 Replies View RelatedWhen running a business logic handler at the subscriber, you can override SubscriberInserts, SubscriberUpdates and SubscriberDeletes. Are these methods called when data is changed coming from the server to client, from the client to the server, or in both directions?
Thanks,
Bryan
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[bkrm_lendcoll] ADD CONSTRAINT
   ReqdCovgAmt_constraint33 CHECK   Â
( caseÂ
 when CovgAmt = 0 and  ReqdCovgAmt = 0 then 1
 when CovgAmt = 0 and  ReqdCovgAmt = 1 then 1
 when CovgAmt = 1 and  ReqdCovgAmt = 0 then 1
 when CovgAmt = 1 and  ReqdCovgAmt = 1 then 0
end =1
)
This is my first attempt to add a constraint for business logic. Â The desired behavior is that the two columns together have the same behavior as a radio button. Â (one can be true, the other true, both can be false, but both cannot be true.) I get this error when I attempt to update it.
The ALTER TABLE statement conflicted with the CHECK constraint "ReqdCovgAmt_constraint33". The conflict occurred in database "Std", table "dbo.lendcoll".
So, basically my question is, when you have two bit columns and want them to have the truth table such as described, how can I set a Check constraint to enforce this?
I have a merge replication topology that allows some subscribers (clients) to retreive a number for certain columns (ie invoice number, order number, etc).
I have implemented a custom business logic handler to check for inserts from the subscriber and before updating the server, I call a stored proc on the server to generate a new number. I update the data set and call ActionOnDataChange.AcceptCustomData. This works great for the publication db but I am trying to get this new number back into the subscription db. I am using web synchronization so I really don't have a connection back to the subscriber database.
Any Ideas? I was thinking about keeping track of the updates myself and build a sql string and somehow get that back to the subscriber to run updates for those columns... I am wondering if I am pushing the limits of the business logic handler? Was it designed to do this? Of course the easy answer is to modify my client application but I am trying to avoid that at this point.
Any help/suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
Hi,
I have 2 related tables in SQL 2005. I am using Business Logic Handler on one of those tables during Merge Replication to reject data for few rows during web synchronization. Once a row is rejected, I would like to run the Business Logic Handler for the related table to reject changes for the row with same foreign key as the rejected row in first table.
Not sure if I need to create separate Business Logic Handlers for each table or can it be achieved in a single Handler.
Also is it possible to get a list of rejected rows back from the handler?
Thanks for help.
I am currenly have a simple merge replication topology. The publisher-distibutor is SQL Server 2005 and the subscriber is a SQL Server Express. The type of subscription is non anonymous pull.
I made a custom business logic handler class that is trying the following:
When a new record is inserted in a published table on the pubsliher, some additional records are added in a differenct table in subscriber. Then the "InsertHandler" method returns "AcceptData" in order to allow the agent to add the new record in current table also.
So I am establishing a new connection to the subscriber and I am trying to add the additional recs in the different table. The problem is that this different table is also published as read-only on the subscriber. So my insert fails saying that table is not updatable.
Is there any way to bypass this problem?
In fact I realised in general that when my custom logic handler performs some DML operations on the subscriber, these are NOT considered as part of the replication e.g. the NOT FOR REPLICATION constraints and triggers are active for these operations.
Is this normal?
Hello,I stuck in a delimma.Where to put the business logic that involves only one updatebut N number of selects from N tables........with N where conditions
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have got a business logic update conflict handler working, but I have had to work round what appears to be a bug.
Please can someone confirm if this is indeed a bug €“ and if it is a known bug?
My conflict handler needs to take some columns from the publisher row and some from the subscriber row in the event of conflict.
I can quite happily generate a custom dataset which contains the winning row that I want €“ I can see that because I can step through the conflict handler with debug when a conflict occurs.
However, just returning ActionOnUpdateConflict.AcceptCustomConflictData from the UpdateConflictsHandler method does not set the publisher and subscriber columns correctly. I end up with different values on the two databases.
I have found that the only way to get the correct rows on both publisher and subscriber is to create a new ADO connection to the publisher and actually perform an update €“ updating all the modified columns. This now works reliably in my testing.
Fortunately, due to business rules the frequency of update conflicts are likely to be very infrequent, but I would very much like to avoid having to do the €˜unnecessary€™ update.
Notes:
I am using column level tracking €“ but I have seen the problem with row level tracking too
I have mainly been using SP1 but have repeated the test on a configuration using the SP2 CTP €“ and the problem occurs there too
The problem is not due to complex logic in my code. If the method just sets customDataSet = publisherDataSet.Copy and then returns ActionOnUpdateConflict.AcceptCustomConflictData, the changed and winning publisher values are not sent to the subscriber
Any thoughts would be much appreciated
What is the way we could implement a business logic from a Table bystoring it statemnnets in a colums and defining an execute sql toexecute it.Some legal requirements make it diffcult for us to createmodify stored procdures so Iwant to have a process where we create newrows in a table and execute it to execute business logic.All views are welcome.Havin g one table two tables different approaches to store ststementsand execute them....Case logic how to implement it?Flags in the tble colums in the tablesetcThanksAjay Garg
View 1 Replies View RelatedPocket PC 2003, SQL Compact Edition, SQL2005, IIS6.0
I implemented a business logic handler to deal with conflicts. When I deploy it on the SQL server which is also the web replication server, the logic handler seems working fine. However, if I deploy this handler to another web server. The logic handler failed to be loaded.
My enviroment settings are desribed as below.
Machine A, distributor, with database and publication. The business logic handler is deployed at C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90COMBusinessLogicHandler.dll. It's registered by using sp_registercustomresolver. The @assembly is specified as @assembly=C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90COMBusinessLogicHandler.dll';
Machine B, IIS server. The same business logic handler is deployed at C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90COMBusinessLogicHandler.dll on the Machine B itself.
When I ran the web replication, the Merge Agent reported the error as below.
Error loading custom assembly "C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90COMBusinessLogicHandler.dll", Error: "Could not load file or assembly 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\COM\BusinessLogicHandler.dll' or one of its dependencies. The given assembly name or codebase was invalid.
It seemed that the Merge Agent had trouble to find my logic handler because the path reported in the error log has two backward slashes. I have no idea where did that came from. I am not sure if that's the cause of the error. Without business logic handler. I had successfully finished web replication of Machine B to sync with Machine A. If I setup web replication directly on Machine A with business logic handler, I can successfully sync as well.
Does anyone has any idea about how to correctly deploy business logic handler on a web server?
Thanks,
Nigel
I am currently working with C and SQL Server 2012. My requirement is to Bulk fetch the records and Insert/Update the same in the other table with some business logic? How do i do this?
View 14 Replies View RelatedI have a table containing a 'queue' of rows waiting to be processed by my application.
Is it possible to call a single stored procedure that selects a row, returns the data and then deletes the row ?
If not, what is the best logic for doing it with two stored procedures ?
The table contains a unique ID, DateTime and nVarChar colums and I could easily add a 'flag' if required.
Any suggestions appreciated.
Steve.
I am new to trying to do IF/THEN logic in a stored procedure. I want to return one query if @property=1 and another if @property=0. Can anyone give me a hint in how to do this correctly. Here's the basic idea of what I am doing:
Create Procedure "get_orders_by_date_and_card"
@property int =0
as
if @property=0
begin
SELECT stores
FROM shops_master_Table
end
else
begin
SELECT restaurants
FROM restaurant_master_table
end
return
Hi
i have written a script that collects the applications and the components each application uses.
I wanted to create a stored procedure so that i could get a snapshot of the application and the components that an application has at a given time.
i have the following database structure
CREATE TABLE [Components] (
[CompID] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,
[RT] [nchar] (7) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NOT NULL ,
[Name] [nchar] (50) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NULL ,
[Version] [smallint] NULL ,
PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[CompID]
) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE TABLE [ApplicationID] (
[ApplicationID] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,
[NodeID] [nchar] (15) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NULL ,
[WinVer] [nchar] (40) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NULL ,
[Hw] [nchar] (40) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NULL ,
[BT] [nchar] (20) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NULL ,
[MT] [nchar] (20) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NULL ,
[Cust] [nchar] (20) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NULL ,
[BVer] [nchar] (10) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NULL ,
[BRel] [nchar] (10) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NULL ,
[WStyle] [nchar] (15) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NULL ,
[DateInst] [datetime] NULL ,
[SnapDate] [datetime] NULL ,
PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ApplicationID]
) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE TABLE [AppComponents] (
[ApplicationID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[CompID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[InsT] [datetime] NULL ,
[Installed] [bit] NULL ,
[SnapDate] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
CONSTRAINT [FK_AppsComponents_ApplicationID] FOREIGN KEY
(
[ApplicationID]
) REFERENCES [ApplicationID] (
[ApplicationID]
),
CONSTRAINT [FK_AppsComponents_Components] FOREIGN KEY
(
[CompID]
) REFERENCES [Components] (
[CompID]
)
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
is there a way of checking if the component is already in the data base if it is then just get the CompID and attach that CompId in the AppsComponents link table and put that in the AppComponents table. the snapdate field is to be the current datetime when the data is collected. Is there a current date function in SQL server? Is it possible to do this in a stored procedure?
Hello.Looking for a smarter way to code the following. I have a storedprocedure I will be passing several variables to. Some times, some ofthe fields used in a WHERE clause will not be passed, and I would liketo avoid having to code a bunch of if statements to set the executingcode. For example, below I would only like to execute the LIKEconditions only when the variable in question is not NULL. I did atest and if the variable is set to null, obviously the select does notreturn what I'm expecting.if @switch = "B"SELECT * from ikb whereikbtitle like @ins1 andikbtitle like @ins2 andikbtitle not like @ins3 andikbbody like @ins1 andikbbody like @ins2 andikbbody not like @ins3endThanks for any help or information with this.
View 2 Replies View Related I know I can call store procedure from store procedure but i want to take the value that the store procedure returned and to use it:
I want to create a table and to insert the result of the store procedure to it.
This is the code: Pay attention to the underlined sentence!
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[test]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DROP TABLE tbl1
CREATE TABLE tbl1 (first_name int ,last_name nvarchar(10) )
INSERT INTO tbl1 (first_name,last_name)
VALUES (exec total_cash '8/12/2006 12:00:00 AM' '8/12/2006 12:00:00 AM' 'gilad' ,'cohen')
END
PLEASE HELP!!!! and God will repay you in kind!
Thanks!
I have a stored procedure using UNION joins on three SQL queries.
Sadly, I'm only now learning how to use Stored Procedures, so if this is a really dumb question, please forgive me. I'm not used to big UNION statements like this either... usually I'm just programming websites to serve information out pretty simply :)
I need to return one result set, sorted by date... one complete result per day. eg: 5/15/2007 | XX | XX | XX | XX | XX | XX |5/16/2007 | XX | XX | XX | XX | XX | XX |5/17/2007 | XX | XX | XX | XX | XX | XX |
Currently, when I run the query, I'm getting three separate date values for each date...
eg:5/15/2007 | XX | XX | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |5/15/2007 | 00 | 00 | XX | XX | 00 | 00 |5/15/2007 | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 | XX | XX |5/16/2007 | XX | XX | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |5/16/2007 | 00 | 00 | XX | XX | 00 | 00 |5/16/2007 | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 | XX | XX |etc
How do I fix this? I've looked through my query ad naseum and don't see anything that sets me off as "wrong".
Here is the stored procedure if you can help. I'd really really love the help!
C R E A T E P R O C E D U R E sp_ApptActivityDate
(@strWHERE as varchar(500), @strWHERECANCELED as varchar(500))
as
exec ('SELECT [date] AS Date, SUM(length) AS TotalSlots, COUNT(cast(substring(appointUniqueKey, 1, 1) AS decimal)) AS TotalAppts, SUM(length * 5) / 60 AS TotalSlotHours, 0 AS TotalActiveSlots, 0 AS TotalActiveAppts, 0 AS TotalActiveSlotHours, 0 AS totalCancelSlots, 0 AS TotalCancelAppts, 0 AS TotalCancelSlotHoursFROM dbo.vw_ALL_ApptActivity ' + @strWHERE + '
UNIONSELECT [date] as DATE, 0 AS TotalSlots, 0 AS TotalAppts, 0 AS TotalSlotHours, SUM(length) AS TotalActiveSlots, COUNT(cast(substring(appointuniquekey, 1, 1) AS decimal)) AS TotalActiveAppts, SUM(length * 5) / 60 AS TotalActiveSlotHours, 0 AS totalCancelSlots, 0 AS TotalCancelAppts, 0 AS TotalCancelSlotHoursFROM dbo.vw_Active_ApptActivity' + @strWHERE + '
UNIONSELECT [date] as DATE, 0 AS TotalSlots, 0 AS TotalAppts, 0 AS TotalSlotHours, 0 AS TotalActiveSlots, 0 AS TotalActiveAppts, 0 AS TotalActiveSlotHours, SUM(length) AS totalCancelSlots, COUNT(cast(substring(AppointUniqueKey, 1, 1) AS decimal)) AS TotalCancelAppts, SUM(length * 5) / 60 AS TotalCancelSlotHoursFROM dbo.vw_CANCELED_ApptActivity ' + @strWHERECANCELED + '
ORDER BY dbo.vw_ALL_ApptActivity.[Date] ' )GO
I have a data model with 7 tables and I'm trying to write a stored procedure for each table that allows four actions. Each stored procedure should have 4 parameters to allow a user to insert, select, update and delete a record from the table.
I want to have a stored procedure that can accept those 4 parameters so I only need to have one stored procedure per table instead of having 28 stored procedures for those 4 actions for 7 tables. I haven't found a good example online yet of conditional logic used in a stored procedure.
Is there a way to add a conditional logic IF statement to a stored procedure so if the parameter was INSERT, go run this statement, if it was UPDATE, go run this statement, etc?
I have attached my data model for reference.
Does anyone have a successful prescribed sequence for installing VS2005 and Business Intelligence Reports Projects on a Vista Business workstation to be used to create reports for a server?
I've looked through everything I can find here and I don't seem to see a clear solution without a lot of trial and error.
Fact is, I've not been successful getting just the reports to install on a plain XP box. Of course, the report creation looks fine on the server but I don't want to work directly on the server.
Thank you
Can anyone take me through synchronization of contacts within Business Contacts Outlook into Microsoft Small Business Accounts?
I run a stand alone PC with NO network. When SBA came SQL was also installed. Apparently you can synchronise Contacts within Business Contacts with SBA but both SBA & Outlook should work through the same SQL server.
Has anyone tried this?
Can someone walk me through the process?
Thanks
Debbie
My store Procedure is not save in Strore Procedure folder at the time of saving it give me option to save in Project folder and file name default is SQLQuery6.sql when i save it after saving when i run my store procedure
exec [dbo].[SP_GetOrdersForCustomer] 'ALFKI'
I am getting below error :
Msg 2812, Level 16, State 62, Line 1
Could not find stored procedure 'dbo.SP_GetOrdersForCustomer'.
Hi guysi would really appreciate your help here. what am i doing wrong with this stored procedure ALTER PROCEDURE usp_CreateNewCustomer( @LName as varchar(50), @FName as varchar(50), @Dept as varchar(50)=NULL, @PhoneType as varchar(50)=NULL, @Complete as Bit=NULL, @CustomerID as Int OUTPUT, @FaxModel as varchar(50)=NULL, @FaxNumber as varchar(50)=NULL, )ASINSERT INTO [CustomerInfo] ([LName], [FName], [Dept], [PhoneType], [Complete]) VALUES (@LName, @FName, @Dept, @PhoneType, @Complete)SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY()INSERT INTO Extras (CustomerID, FaxModel, FaxNumber) VALUES (@CustomerID, @FaxModel, @FaxNumber)RETURN It keeps on complaning "'usp_CreateNewCustomer' expects parameter '@CustomerID', which was not supplied."thanks
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi all,
I have a few question regarding SPROC. Firstly, I want to create a sp, that will return a multiple column of data, how do you achieve that. Secondly, I want to create a store procedure that will return a multiple columns in a cursor as an output variable. Any help will be much appreciated. Can you have more then 1 return parameters???
Thanks.
Kabir
I have asp.net web application which interface with SQL server,
I want to run store procedure query of SQL using my asp.net application.
How to declare connectons strings, dataset, adapter etc to run my store procedure resides in sql server.
for Instance Dim connections as string,
Dim da as dataset, Dim adpt as dataadapter. etc
if possible , then show me completely code so I can run store procedure using my button click event in my asp.net application
thank you
maxmax
I am not sure if it is right place to ask the question. I have a store procedure in which funcitons are called and several temp tables are created. When I use sql analyzer, it runs fast. But when I called it from asp.net app, it runs slow and it waits and waits to get data and insert into temp tables and return. Though I have used with (nolock), it still not imprvoed. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.
NetAdventure
Hello, I am very new to ASP.NET and SQL Server. I am a college student and just working on some project to self teaching myself them both. I am having a issue. I was wondering if anyone could help me.
Ok, I am creating a web app that will help a company to help with inventory. The employee's have cretin equipment assign to them (more then one equipment can be assigned). I have a search by equipment and employee, to search by equipment the entire database even then equipment that isn't assigned with the employee's it shows only that employees and if they have any equipment. They can select a recorded to edit or see the details of the record. The problem i am having is that the Info page will not load right. I am redirected the Serial Number and EmployeeID to the info page. I got everything working except one thing. If a person has more then one equipment when i click on the select it redirect and only shows the first record not the one I selected. and when i change it, a employee that doesn't have equipment will not show up totally.
SELECT E.FirstName AS UserFirstName, E.LastName AS UserLastName, eqtype.Description AS UserEquipType, empeq.UserEquipID, E.EmployeeID, E.cwopa_id, eq.IPAddress, eq.Location, eq.DataLine3, eq.DataLine2, eq.Voice, eq.DataLine1, eq.FloorBox, eq.Comments, eq.SerialNo, eq.Model, eq.Brand, eq.TagNo, eq.PurchaseLease, eq.WarrantyExpDate, eq.PhoneType, eq.PhoneNum, eq.CellNumber, eq.DataNumber, eq.SIDNumber, eq.Carrier
FROM dbo.EMPLOYEES AS E LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.EMPLOYEES_EQUIP AS empeq ON empeq.EmployeeID = E.EmployeeID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.EQUIPMENT AS eq ON eq.EquipID = empeq.EquipID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.EQUIP_TYPE AS eqtype ON eqtype.EquipTypeID = eq.EquipTypeID WHERE E.EmployeeID = @EmployeeID and eq.SerialNo=@SerialNo
EmployeeID and SerialNo are primary keys.
I was thinking maybe create a store procedures, but I have no idea how to do it. I created this and no syntax error came up but it doesn't work
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.inventoryinfo AS
DECLARE @EmployeeID int DECLARE @SerialNo varchar(50)
IF( @SerialNo is NULL)
SELECT E.FirstName AS UserFirstName, E.LastName AS UserLastName, eqtype.Description AS UserEquipType, empeq.UserEquipID, E.EmployeeID, E.cwopa_id, eq.IPAddress, eq.Location, eq.DataLine3, eq.DataLine2, eq.Voice, eq.DataLine1, eq.FloorBox, eq.Comments, eq.SerialNo, eq.Model, eq.Brand, eq.TagNo, eq.PurchaseLease, eq.WarrantyExpDate, eq.PhoneType, eq.PhoneNum, eq.CellNumber, eq.DataNumber, eq.SIDNumber, eq.Carrier
FROM dbo.EMPLOYEES AS E LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.EMPLOYEES_EQUIP AS empeq ON empeq.EmployeeID = E.EmployeeID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.EQUIPMENT AS eq ON eq.EquipID = empeq.EquipID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.EQUIP_TYPE AS eqtype ON eqtype.EquipTypeID = eq.EquipTypeID WHERE E.EmployeeID = @EmployeeID
ELSE
SELECT E.FirstName AS UserFirstName, E.LastName AS UserLastName, eqtype.Description AS UserEquipType, empeq.UserEquipID, E.EmployeeID, E.cwopa_id, eq.IPAddress, eq.Location, eq.DataLine3, eq.DataLine2, eq.Voice, eq.DataLine1, eq.FloorBox, eq.Comments, eq.SerialNo, eq.Model, eq.Brand, eq.TagNo, eq.PurchaseLease, eq.WarrantyExpDate, eq.PhoneType, eq.PhoneNum, eq.CellNumber, eq.DataNumber, eq.SIDNumber, eq.Carrier
FROM dbo.EMPLOYEES AS E LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.EMPLOYEES_EQUIP AS empeq ON empeq.EmployeeID = E.EmployeeID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.EQUIPMENT AS eq ON eq.EquipID = empeq.EquipID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.EQUIP_TYPE AS eqtype ON eqtype.EquipTypeID = eq.EquipTypeID WHERE E.EmployeeID = @EmployeeID and eq.SerialNo=@SerialNoGO
Also, when a user selects the select button in either Employee search or Equipment search it redirects them to info.aspx. Should I create a different aspx page for both? But I don't believe I should do that. I don't know if I gave you enough information or not. But if you could give examples that would be wonderful! Thanks so much Nickie
I want to know when does SQL flushes Store Procedure from the cache.
Thank You,
Piyush Patel