I would like to know if there is any way to restrict users from creating temp tables.
Problem: I am facing problems with lots of temporary objects getting created in my database. The users have read-only access to the database for adhoc-querying purpose through QA. Yet they are able to create temporary tables in tempdb database taking lot of resources on tempdb disk causing abnormally high growth of tempdb.
it seems like i am able to create it. But when i try to access that temporary table, i get an error "Invalid object". this is happening only when i try to create local temporary table. Global temporary table works fine inside the dynamic SQL.
Hi, I'd like to create a temporary table (# or ## table) and have it available in DataFlow to work with it. I see I can create it using "Execute SQL Task" component in ControlFlow; but it's not available in DataFlow. It seems it should be created by a DataFlow component to be seen in the same DataFlow. Any Idea on this?
Any one can help me, below error messages for reference, thanks! Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: EXECUTE permission denied on object 'sp_insertspend', database 'master', owner 'dbo'.Source Error:
Line 96: cmdMid.Connection = conMid; Line 97: cmdMid.CommandText = "exec sp_insertspend '" + uid + "','" + Mid + "','" + status + "','" + spend + "'"; Line 98: cmdMid.ExecuteNonQuery(); Line 99: conMid.Close(); Line 100:Source File: f:Microsoft Visual Studio 8WebSoccermain.aspx.cs Line: 98 Stack Trace:
Can any body tell me how can I restrict a user who has Sa previlages, from droping a table. He should be able to do everything except droping the table.
I create a new user who will have a read only permission on TestDB.
I want to give only select permission on TestDB and also I don't want that the new user will not see any other database.
DENY VIEW ANY DATABASE to user_readonly
ALTER AUTHORIZATION ON DATABASE :: TestDB TO user_readonly
but when I am using the above query then the new user is the owner of the testdb. i don't want that. I want that the user will have only select permission on the table.is there any way?
I would like to disable a user account from logging to the database. I would like to know the difference between deny connect to sql permission and disabling an account by alter login disable. Please advice. Thanks
Just encountered something that I wasn't expected, in that a user who has an explicit deny on a column in a table was able to select it when referenced through a view in a schema they have the SELECT permission on. This seems to me to go against the principle that DENY overrides everything when it comes to permissions? Is this how it's meant to work?
Code is below:-
--create test user CREATE USER TestDenyOnViewUser WITHOUT LOGIN GO
--create test schema (authorization dbo - same owner as dbo schema so ownership chaining will apply) CREATE SCHEMA TestDenyOnView AUTHORIZATION dbo
You can't assign a default schema for a user that maps to a Windows group. OK fine. But if you create a user for that group anyway with no default schema, any objects created by members of that group will automatically cause a schema to be created for them, EVEN WHEN THAT USER HAS BEEN EXPLICITLY DENIED THE CREATE SCHEMA PERMISSION IN THE DATABASE. This is the same as it was in 2K5, but has still not been fixed in 2k8.
To reproduce, do the following steps: Create a windows group, either in the doman or local to the box. Add at least one Windows user to that group. Create a SQL login for that Windows group. Map that login to a new user in some database. Explicitly 'deny create schema to ' that group/user. Grant 'create procedure' to that group/user. Log onto SQL with a Windows login that is a member of that Windows group Use the database that we set the permissions in above. Create a dummy stored procedure without qualifying the name with a schema ie: 'create prodedure test1 as select 'hello world'). Look to see what you ended up with. You will have a new schema named the same as the user who created the sproc. This will now be their default schema implicitly, and the test1 stored procedure will be in that schema, EVEN WHEN THAT USER WA EXPLICITLY DENIED THE CREATE SCHEMA PERMISSION IN THE DATABASE.
Firstly I consider myself quite an experienced SQL Server user, andamnow using SQL Server 2005 Express for the main backend of mysoftware.My problem is thus: The boss needs to run reports; I have designedthese reports as SQL procedures, to be executed through an ASPapplication. Basic, and even medium sized (10,000+ records) reportingrun at an acceptable speed, but for anything larger, IIS timeouts andquery timeouts often cause problems.I subsequently came up with the idea that I could reduce processingtimes by up to two-thirds by writing information from eachcalculationstage to a number of tables as the reporting procedure runs..ie. stage 1, write to table xxx1,stage 2 reads table xxx1 and writes to table xxx2,stage 3 reads table xxx2 and writes to table xxx3,etc, etc, etcprocedure read final table, and outputs information.This works wonderfully, EXCEPT that two people can't run the samereport at the same time, because as one procedure creates and writesto table xxx2, the other procedure tries to drop the table, or read atable that has already been dropped....Does anyone have any suggestions about how to get around thisproblem?I have thought about generating the table names dynamically using'sp_execute', but the statement I need to run is far too long(apparently there is a maximum length you can pass to it), and evenbreaking it down into sub-procedures is soooooooooooooooo timeconsuming and inefficient having to format statements as strings(replacing quotes and so on)How can I use multiple tables, or indeed process HUGE procedures,withdynamic table names, or temporary tables?All answers/suggestions/questions gratefully received.Thanks
When I use comands insert and update with VB5 and ODBC, one temporary stored procedure is created in database tempdb to each command executed. These stored procedures are deleted only when the connection is closed. My program use comands insert and update inside a loop, and a lot of temporary stored procedure are generated and full the database tempdb. When it occur, others systems are afecteds.
My questions: Why it occur ? Wich have created this stored procedure ? How to avoid it occur ?
The versions are: SQL Server 6.5 Visual Basic 5.0 SQL Server ODBC Driver 2.65.0240
ERD above is what my database looks like (ignore it's in Access, database is in SQL 2005)
I have this code:
SELECT orderID, orderAmount = SUM(customerID)/customerID FROM orders GROUP BY orderID -- When Sum of the customer ID (and then) divided by the customer ID > 1 HAVING orderAmount > 1
which doesn't work because I never did find out how you make a column in the results to output your maths in. orderAmount doesn't exist as a column in the database, but for this query it should show only those customers who have ordered more than once with the company.
Hi,I want to create a temporary table and store the logdetails froma.logdetail column.select a.logdetail , b.shmacnocase when b.shmacno is null thenselectcast(substring(a.logdetail,1,charindex('·',a.logde tail)-1) aschar(2)) as ShmCoy,cast(substring(a.logdetail,charindex('·',a.logdeta il)+1,charindex('·',a.logdetail,charindex('·',a.lo gdetail)+1)-(charindex('·',a.logdetail)+1))as char(10)) as ShmAcnointo ##tblabcendfrom shractivitylog aleft outer joinshrsharemaster bon a.logkey = b.shmrecidThis statement giving me syntax error. Please help me..Server: Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 2Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'case'.Server: Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 7Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'end'.sample data in a.logdetailBR··Light Blue Duck··Toon Town Central·Silly Street···02 Sep2003·1·SGL·SGL··01 Jan 1900·0·0·0·0·0.00······0234578······· ····· ··········UB··Aqua Duck··Toon Town Central·Punchline Place···02 Sep2003·1·SGL·SGL··01 Jan 1900·0·0·0·0·0.00·····Regards.
Can you create a temporary table using an ad-hoc query?
What I am trying to do is a type of filter search (the user has this and this or this) were i will not know how may items the user is going to select until they submit....that is why i can't use a stored procedure(i think)....any help on how to do this?
I'm having trouble with a query and ASP. The query itself is easy. I need a temporary table to be filled with the contents of a select and then i need to select out of the temporary table and return the results to the ASP.
INSERT into @results (ItemID, ItemDescription, ItemType, ItemRequestedBy, ItemStatus, ItemQuantity, ItemCostPer, ItemOrderNumber, DateAdded, DateLastEdited) SELECT * from cr_EquipmentData
SELECT * from @results
When I run this in Query Analyser, I get exactly the results I need... But when I try and run the ASP script, I get an error about the recordset not being open. (It's not the ASP checking 'cos when I run a simple select statement it works)
I appreciate there is no use for the query as it stands, but eventually I want to be able to perform not destructive statements on the @results table before returning the data to ASP. This is more 'testing' than anything at the mo'
I am writing a stored procedure that outputs it's information to a temporary table while it assembles the information. Afterwards, it returns the contents of the temporary table as the results of the stored procedure.
I found that if you create the table, inside the SP, as an ordinary table, the information builds to that table considerably faster than if you use a true temporary table.
I found that if I create a user function that returns a table as it's return value, it is also as slow as if I used a true temporary table.
The database can amass over 2 million records in one table in just a few days. If I have the procedure query against this table, and output to an ordinary table it creates, and summarize the information it is adding to the table, then it takes an average of around 4 minutes to return the results from the query. If I change the output table to a temporary table (#temp), it between 12 and 15 minutes. Nothing else in the procedure changed. Just the kind of table. If I take the logic and move it to a function which returns those results in a RETURN table, it also takes over 14 minutes.
Why would it take so much longer outputing to a temporary table rather than a normal table? Is it because temporary tables are stored in a different database (tempdb)? Why would returning query results from a function be just as slow?
Hi, I am trying to join two tables usig two temporary tables.I want the Output as table2/table1 = Output
Select temp2.Value/temp1.Value as val from ( ( select count(*)as Value from [Master] m inner join [Spares]s on s.SId=m.SID where m.Valid_From between '2007-06-01' and '2007-06-30' )temp1 Union ( select isnull(sum(convert(numeric(10,0),s.Unit_Price)),'0') as Value from [Order] h inner join [Spares] s on s.Number = s.Number where h.Valid_Date between '2007-06-01' and '2007-06-30' ))temp2 as t
Our java application is running on oracle and now we would like to port it to sql server 2000. In oracle we have a global temporary tables that has an option on commit to delete rows. Now I am looking for the same option in sql server but as far as I can see sql server's local temporary tables are visible per connection. Since the connection are shared in the pool it seems I can not rely on local temporary tables since the connection does not get closed at the end of the user's session. I need something that is visible per transaction not per connection.
Is it a better approach just to create a regular table and basically have a trigger to delete all data on commit?
If a stored procedure invokes another stored procedure that creates atemporary table why can't the calling procedure see the temporary table?CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.GetTempASCREATE TABLE #Test([id] int not null identity,[name] as char(4))INSERT INTO #Test ([name]) VALUES ('Test')CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.TestASEXEC dbo.GetTempSELECT * FROM #Test -- Invalid object name '#Test'.Thanks,TP
Hi, just a quick question regarding performance and speed.Q. Run a complicated query three times or create a TEMPORARY table andaccess it as needed?I have a page where it will be accessed 10,000+ a day.In that page I have an SQL query where it involves 3 different tables(approximate table sizes T1) 200,000 T2) 900,000 T3) 20 records)I'll be running that query 3 times in that page...One to retrieve the content and display it on the page.Second to count the number of records (using COUNT(*) function)And third to retrieve the content regions. (using DISTINCT function)What would be the best way of doing...Running the SQL query 3 timesOrCreate a temporary table and access it as many time as I needRegards,
I would like to know from other members whether they are successful in using temporary tables within a stored procedure and use that stored procedure in a report.
My scenario is like this:
I have a stored procedure A which fetches the data from different tables based on the orderno passed as input parameter.
I have built another stored procedure B with a temporary table created and inserting the rows in to this temporary table based on vendor related specifc orders by calling the above procedure A.
I have used this stored procedure in the dataset created and getting this error:
Could not generate a list of fields for the query. Check the query syntax, or click the Refresh Fields on the query toolbar.
Does anybody encountered this and have a resolution.
The table definition for @temp is the same as TBL_EVENT_DEFINiTION. The problem is I need to add a field to the @temp table and define the values using an update statement. If I include the additional field in the @temp table declaration then I get an error saying something to the effect of the number of fields is different. Is there a way of altering the temporary table to add this field?
I'm creating a temporary table in a procedure to help me with some calculations. I would like the name of the temporary table to be 'dynamic', I mean, to have the hour it was created, something like this: create table #myTempTable15May11:10:00, so if someone access the procedure while it's running, he won't have problems in creating his 'own' temporary table (create table #myTempTable15May11:10:02). Is there anyway I can do this?
I tried to make a DTS to transform data in a text file, I used a Store Procedure that use a temp table (#Resultados) but the DTS give me an error.
I read that in this case I can´t use local temp tables but I can use global temp tables, then I changed in my Store, #Resultados by ##Resultados, bu the result was the same.
SELECT LEFT(RP.Grupo,3) + LEFT(RP.Equipo,12) + LEFT(RP.SubGrupo,2) + LEFT(D.Fecha,8) + D.Valor as Dato FROM ReportesPlantilla RP LEFT JOIN ##Resultados D ON RP.Planta = D.Planta AND RP.Etapa = D.Etapa AND RP.GrupoEquipo = D.GrupoEquipo AND RP.Equipo = D.Equipo AND RP.Concepto = D.Concepto AND D.Fecha BETWEEN @FechaIni AND @FechaFin
