Exclude Records From A Table Where ID Column Is Same But Mail Code Column Is Multi-valued
Nov 12, 2012
I am trying to exclude records from a table where the ID column is the same but the Mail code Column is multi-valued.For Example: (the table looks like....)
I got a sales cost and cost amount table for my budget. the sales cost table is getting updated with FOBB items which makes the total incorrect . the FOBB values needs to be moved from the sales cost column to the cost amount column. how can i do it with an SQL script.
I am creating a query which will show patients that are enrolled in more than one program, but I need to exclude those patients that enrolled more than once in the same program. Here's part of the code:
SELECT member_id, service_id FROM pat_prg_info ppi
TRANSFORM Avg(SAP_CALD.[CASE_DAYS]) AS AvgOfCASE_DAYS SELECT SAP_CALD.[OPN_YEAR], SAP_CALD.[CLD_MONTH], Avg(SAP_CALD.[CASE_DAYS]) AS [Total Of CASE_DAYS] FROM SAP_CALD GROUP BY SAP_CALD.[OPN_YEAR], SAP_CALD.[CLD_MONTH] PIVOT SAP_CALD.[Model];
which works fine. I want to look at the query SAP_CALD and disclude any record in the field 'department' that has a record of any {DPSG, System, Dealer, DealerIT, Inbound}..I can do this by piggybacking a another query that removes these but wondered if it would be easier to exclude them in the crosstab code.
I'm running 2014 enterprise and getting an error on this form of a query...it says the multi part identifier "mns.col3" could not be bound. I'm aware that a cross apply would be more appropriate but i'm just prototyping and probably going to move to a set based approach anyway.The udf returns a table.
select mns.col1, mns.col2 from table1 mns left join dbo.udf_udf1(@firstofmonth,@lastofmonth, mns.col3) x on 1=1
We run std 2008 r2. I haven't looked at my friend's function closely yet bur he showed me that when he selects from the function with one column and the same where clause he uses on same func with select *, he gets no data under the column he requested.Â
But when he selects * he gets a single row.
I took a peek and see a bunch of left joins followed by a bunch of outer applies in his func. I suppose (thinking out load) if anything random like the order of rows returned or sql decisions on how query runs can affect his function, that might explain it. Â
I'm creating a Multi-statement Table-Valued Function...
Is it possible to insert variables into the table? In other words, is it possible to have something like
declare @value1 varchar(10) @value2 varchar(10)
BEGIN <do some work on value1 and value2> INSERT @returningTable @value1, @value2
instead of
BEGIN <do some work on value1 and value2> INSERT @returningTable SELECT col1, col2 from T_SOURCE
Here's why I want to insert variables...My function needs to return a table which contains a 'partial' incremental key. I'll go with an example to explain what i have to do
Source_table col1 col2 Mike 10 Mike 20 Ben 50 John 15 John 25 John 35
The table that my function needs to create should look like this col1 col2 col3 Mike 10 1 Mike 20 2 Ben 50 1 John 15 1 John 25 2 John 35 3
I thought of creating a cursor and then looping through it generate col3 and save values of other individual columns in variables. But don't know how to use those variables when inserting records into function table.
Any other ideas? I'm caoming from Oracle world, I might be having some strange ideas on how to solve this problem. Any help is appreciated.
I have two tables, one a data table, the other a product table. I want to perform a join on the two tables with values distributed into columns based on the value in the month field.
Hey I have created a multi-statement table valued function
alter function fn_x(@x int)returns @tbl table ( position int identity primary key, i int) as begin insert into @tbl values (@x) insert into @tbl values (@x) insert into @tbl values (@x) insert into @tbl values (@x) returnend
Is it possible skipping the definition of the table columns (the light blue part)?I need to return a different structure based on a parameter.Dropping those lines throws an error "incorrect syntax near 'as'" The other solution is declaring each udf separately as one statement udf.Thanks
I need to create a function which takes a multi-value parameter. When I select more than one item, I get the error that I have too many arguments. Does anybody have a solution?
Or can I create a view and then do a "SELECT * FROM viewName WHERE columnName IN (@param)"?
hi i have over 200 tables with all same column and data type locate all over the server(20)different database. so i have table call Tname to stored all the link like (databasename.dbo.tablename) so my job will call the Tname table to use cursor to insert records. but the problem is there's one or more table's column name K datatype has been modify by someone else. so is it cause the job fail. if there a way or SQL statment that i can use Table Tname to see which one is missing column name K? and is there a way i can print out all the datatype and len for all the table column k? please help thanks
Hi,Would like to know the performance differenece between Multi-columnIndex vs Single Column Indexes. Let's say I have a table with col1,col2, col3 along with a primary key column and non-indexed columns.In queries, I will use col1, col2, and col3 together and some timesjust one or two of these three columns. My questions is, should Icreate one index contains col1, col2, and col3, or create 3 seperatedcolumns. I.e. each column has its own index. Any performancedifference?Thanks a lot.
Hi all,A (possibly dumb) question, but I've had no luck finding a definitiveanswer to it. Suppose I have two tables, Employees and Employers, whichboth have a column named "Id":Employees-Id-FirstName-LastName-SSNetc.Employers-Id-Name-Addressetc.and now I perform the following join:SELECT Employees.*, Employers.*FROM Employees LEFT JOIN Employers ON (Employees.Id=Employers.Id)The result-set will contain two "Id" columns, so SQL Server willdisambiguate them; one column will still be called "Id", while theother will be called "Id1." My question is, how are you supposed toknow which "Id" column belongs to which table? My intuition tells me,and limited testing seems to indicate, that it depends on the order inwhich the table names show up in the query, so that in the aboveexample, "Id" would refer to Employees.Id, while "Id1" would refer toEmployers.Id. Is this order guaranteed?Also, why does SQL Server use such a IMO brain-damaged technique tohandle column name conflicts? In MS Access, it's much morestraightforward; after executing the above query, you can use"Employees.Id" and "Employers.Id" (and more generally,"TableNameOrTableAlias.ColumnName") to refer to the specific "Id"column you want, instead of "Id" and "Id1" -- the"just-tack-on-a-number" strategy is slightly annoying when dealing withcomplex queries.--Mike S
I am attempting to create an SQL statement that will query a file and give me amount totals by company number/customer number. The totals have to be combined into 4 groups (1/2/3/4) for each amount total in company number/customer number combination. In effect it will look something like this:
I HAVE THIS PART WORKING ALREADY. The problem is that I am trying to exclude the rows that have 0 (zero) in the amount column from showing up in the output. The amount is a calculated field of all the invoice for that company number/customer number combination for that sort (eg: Company 00001/Customer 11111/Sort 1 has $55 associated to it). I cannot use the calculated field in my where clause.
I will include a simplified version of my select statement so you can see how I got as far as I have and where to go so I pretty much say "WHERE SUM(SubTBL.Amount) <> 0".
----SELECT STATEMENT----- SELECT MainTBL.Cust#, SUM(SubTBL.Amount) As TotAmt, CASE WHEN (days (currdate) - days (MainTBL.DateFLD)) <= 30 THEN '1' WHEN (days (currdate) - days (MainTBL.DateFLD)) BETWEEN 31 AND 60 THEN '2' WHEN (days (currdate) - days (MainTBL.DateFLD)) BETWEEN 61 AND 90 THEN '3' WHEN (days (currdate) - days (MainTBL.DateFLD))> 90 THEN '4'
Hi. I'm creating a new publication for replication. There are a few columns on our main database I do not want published as they contain some confidential information. When I go to create a new publication, I go through the wizard and I select the option to filter rows vertically. I uncheck the columns I don't want published and the wizard completes without any errors.
When I go to start the Snapshot agent to create the database on new server, it gets error saying it cannot find certain columns--the columns I do not want published to begin with.
Am i doing something wrong? I appreciate any help you may provide!
I want to populate data from Production to UAT(except Identity column).For that I created query,its generating script what i have required.But in last column getting with comma.I should eliminate the last comma.
script to my requirement:
declare @TABLE_SCHEMA varchar(10) set @TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' declare @TABLE_NAME varchar(100) set @TABLE_NAME='Demo_Table' SELECT ORDINAL_POSITION AS COLUMN_POSTION ,TABLE_SCHEMA,TABLE_NAME
I've created a number of tables, views, sproc, and functions whose names begin with "sys_", but when I tried to create a multi-statement table-valued function with this type of name, I got:
Server: Msg 1706, Level 16, State 2, Procedure sys_tmp, Line 9 System table 'sys_test' was not created, because ad hoc updates to system catalogs are not enabled.
I had a quick look in this forum for 1706 (and on Google) but couldn't find anything. Does anyone know for certain if this is a bug in SQL2K?
Thanks, Jos
Here's a test script: /* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- T-SQL code to test creation of three types of function where the function name begins with "sys_". Jos Potts, 02-Nov-2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
PRINT @@VERSION go
PRINT 'Scalar function with name "sys_" creates ok...' go
CREATE FUNCTION sys_test () RETURNS INT AS BEGIN RETURN 1 END go
DROP FUNCTION sys_test go
PRINT '' go
PRINT 'In-line table-valued function with name "sys_" creates ok...' go
CREATE FUNCTION sys_test () RETURNS TABLE AS RETURN SELECT 1 c go
DROP FUNCTION sys_test go
PRINT '' go
PRINT 'Multi-statement table-valued function with name "sys_" generates error 1706...' go
CREATE FUNCTION sys_tmp () RETURNS @t TABLE (c INT) AS BEGIN
And here€™s the output from running the test script in Query Analyser on our server: Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039 (Intel X86) May 3 2005 23:18:38 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.0 (Build 2195: Service Pack 4)
Scalar function with name "sys_" creates ok...
In-line table-valued function with name "sys_" creates ok...
Multi-statement table-valued function with name "sys_" generates error 1706... Server: Msg 1706, Level 16, State 2, Procedure sys_tmp, Line 11 System table 'sys_tmp' was not created, because ad hoc updates to system catalogs are not enabled. Server: Msg 3701, Level 11, State 5, Line 2 Cannot drop the function 'sys_test', because it does not exist in the system catalog.
This is a followup to a previous question to a previous but in reverse of Find rows where value in column not found in another row
Given one table, Table1, with columns Key1 (int), Key2 (int), and Type (varchar)...
I would like to exclude any two rows where Type is equal to 'TypeA' and Key2 is Null that have a corresponding row in the table where Type is equal to 'TypeB' and Key2 is equal to Key1 from another row.
I would like to return all the rows except where Key=1 and Key=3 because those rows together meet the criteria of Type='TypeA'/Key2=NULL and does have a corresponding row with Type='TypeB'/Key1=Key2.
I want to fetch max of Field2 if duplicate records in Field1 and rest of the values of field1 , below is the sample format.
Field1 Field2 Field3 Field4 32 375 abc-xyz A 32 379 xyz-efg A 55 405 abc-xyz B 55 407 xyz-efg B 132 908 abc-xyz C 132 999 xyz-efg C 152 800 abc-xyz D 152 850 xyz-efg D 155 900 abc-xyz E 156 925 abc-xyz F 157 935 abc-xyz G
Table A has columns CompressedProduct, Tool, Operation
Table B in a differnt database has columns ID, Product, Tool Operation
I cannot edit table A. I can select records from A and insert into B. And I can select only the records that are in both tables.
But I want to be able to select any records that are in table A but not in Table B.
ie. I want to select records from A where the combination of Product, Tool and Operaton does not appear in Table B, even if all 3 on their own do appear.
This code return all the records from A. I need to filter out the records found in Table B.
SELECT ID, CompressedProduct, oq.Tool, oq.Operation FROM OPENQUERY (Lisa_Link, 'SELECT DISTINCT CompressedProduct, Tool, Operation FROM tblToolStatus ts JOIN tblProduct p ON ts.ProductID = p.ProductID JOIN tblTool t ON ts.ToolID = t.ToolID JOIN tblOperation o ON ts.OperationID = o.OperationID WHERE ts.ToolID=66 ') oq LEFT JOIN Family f on oq.CompressedProduct = f.Product and oq.Tool = f.Tool and oq.Operation = f.Operation
I need to delete records from a table (Table1) which has a foreign key column in a related table (Table2).
Table1 columns are: table1Id; Name. Table2 columns include Table2.table1Id which is the foreign key to Table1.
What is the syntax to delete records from Table1 using Table1.Name='some name' and remove any records in Table2 that have Table2.table1Id equal to Table1.table1Id?
Godwin writes "Hello, Heres my question.. I have 2 tables.2 paticular columns exist in both the tables. I want to be able to select those 2 columns on the 1st table and insert them on to the same 2 columns on the 2nd table.
Now,this 2nd table has another 3 columns that exist in another table.I would like to take those 3 column values from that 3rd table and insert it into the 2nd table by modifying those existing records in the 2nd table.In the 3rd table,there will be around 5 records...I want to copy the existing records 5 times in the 2nd table and insert the 3rd tables rows inside the 2nd table in that respective column for 5 rows.
I hope you understand what I mean...Im sorry for really confusing.. Please help me Thanks Godwin"
Ok, so I need to count the Distinct records from column 1 in which there is not a true value in any of the records for that distinct column 1 number. Here is a short example of my records:dbo_dbWafer_Slicing
dbo_dbWafer_Slicing
WaferID SawDate SawRunNumber Pass
03-157.05 1/8/2008 9:54:00 AM 03-157 0
03-157.03 1/8/2008 9:53:00 AM 03-157 -1
03-157.04 1/8/2008 9:53:00 AM 03-157 0
03-157.02 1/8/2008 9:52:00 AM 03-157 -1
03-157.01 1/8/2008 9:50:00 AM 03-157 -1
03-165.06 1/4/2008 10:46:00 AM 03-165 0
03-165.07 1/4/2008 10:46:00 AM 03-165 0
03-165.04 1/4/2008 10:45:00 AM 03-165 0
03-165.05 1/4/2008 10:45:00 AM 03-165 0
03-165.02 1/4/2008 10:44:00 AM 03-165 0
03-165.03 1/4/2008 10:44:00 AM 03-165 0
03-165.01 1/4/2008 10:43:00 AM 03-165 0
So, how many Distinct SawRunNumbers had no passing wafers? In trying to do this I've come up with:"SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT SawRunNumber) AS BouleCount FROM dbWafer_Slicing WHERE (SawDate >= @MinDate) AND (SawDate <= @MaxDate) AND (Pass = 1) HAVING (COUNT(DISTINCT WaferID) > 0)" but that doenst work. It still counts records where pass = 0 for distinct SawRunNumbers even if one record within that SawRunNumber is passing. From the above sample data I should get a result of 1 not 2 or 3. Can I do this with this set of data? I'm using SQL Server 2005 EE.Thanks for your help.
My overarching goal is to generate sets of random Symptom records for each Enrollee in a drug study, so that for each cycle (period of time), the code will insert a random number of random records for each enrollee.
I'm trying to return a number of random records from a table, but inside a table-valued function... (which could be my problem).
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.ufn_GetTopSymptoms ( @enrollID INT , @CTCVersion VARCHAR(20) , @NumRecords INT ) RETURNS TABLE
[Code] ....
But that ORDER BY NEWID() clause is illegal apparently, because here's the error it throws:
Msg 443, Level 16, State 1, Procedure ufn_GetTopSymptoms, Line 13 Invalid use of a side-effecting operator 'newid' within a function.
I was hoping I could return a set of enrollmentIDs and then use CROSS APPLY to generate a random set of records for each enrollmentID... is this not possible with APPLY? I was trying to avoid using a cursor...
The idea is basically to create all the Symptom records for all the patients in treatment cycle at once by using Enrollee OUTER APPLY dbo.ufn_GetTopSymtoms(dbo.Enrollment.EnrolleeID)
but that's clearly not working. Is there a way to do this without resorting to a cursor?
I have these two tables Log and CategoryLog, I need to archive records older than 13 months in these two tables to two separate tables and then delete the archived records from Log and CategoryLog tables. The problem is that only 'Log' table has a date column, the other table CategoryLog does not have any date column. But the two tables are connected by a column(LogID). How to archive the data and then delete the archive data from both tables.
Hi guys, If I have a temporary table called #CTE With the columns [Account] [Name] [RowID Table Level] [RowID Data Level] and I need to change the column type for the columns: [RowID Table Level] [RowID Data Level] to integer, and set the column [RowID Table Level] as Identity (index) starting from 1, incrementing 1 each time. What will be the right syntax using SQL SERVER 2000?
I am trying to solve the question in the link below: http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2093921&SiteID=1
Thanks in advance, Aldo.
I have tried the code below, but getting syntax error...
ALTER TABLE #CTE ALTER COLUMN [RowID Table Level] INT IDENTITY(1,1), [RowID Data Level] INT;
I have also tried:
ALTER TABLE #CTE MODIFY [RowID Table Level] INT IDENTITY(1,1), [RowID Data Level] INT;
I have installed SQL Server Express Edition. I have migrated a set of tables from Oracl10g (by using Microsoft's Migration Tool Kit).While I am trying the following simple update command, the session hangs and it never finishes !!!!!!!!!!!!
For example,I have a table "authors" with a column "author_name",and it has three value "Anne Ringer,Ann Dull,Johnson White".Here I want to create a new table by using a select sentence,its columns come from the values of the column "author_name".
can you tell me how can I complete this with the SQL?
