Facing Problem In Increasing Connection String Pool Size Sqlserver
Mar 4, 2005
Hi to all,
I am using a connection string like
data source=RemoteHostName;initial catalog=myDb;password=sa;user id=sa;
Max pool size = 200;
And now strange thing is happening ,, I am receiving error :
Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection
from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in
use and max pool size was reached
The SqlServer Activity Manager is telling that only 100 connections are pooled, and I guess that the Max pool size is 100, It is not being changed by my Connection string. As I am trying to change the default 100 pool size value to 200.
Huh , So stucked up , how to increase the Max pool size.. Is there any way .
hi i'm having this error on my application"cannot allocate more connection.connect pool is at maximum increase max pool size" the proble is when i do testing this error does not apply it only Appears when the application is been used by many people How can I resolve this? Thanks
I have recently installed SP2 for SQLServer 2005 and started to have connection pool issues. I have tried to explicitly mention the pool settings in connection string and yet pooling doesn't seem to work. I have one more box with no service packs applied and is pooling is perfect!. Has any one experienced this??
I have to supply a sqlserver connection string in the format:
ip address:port, how do i go about finding out what the port number is on the sqlserver server ??? This is for an R25 collegent interface connection, if that helps .
For nearly 6 wks I have been trying to workout with GoDaddy.com a connection string that will connect to the SQL Server 2000 from my ASP.Net web application. In my programming, I have placed the connection string in the web.config file and then call it from there within code behind using the SQLConnection object. My web.config entry has the following form: <appSettings> <add key="Conn" value="server=GoDaddyserver;integrated security=SSPI;database=databaseonGoDaddyserver;" /> </appSettings>I have also written the key supplying the UID and pwd. Nothing works and their support is of no help.Has anyone else had this difficulty either in general or with GoDaddy in particular?
I need to conect my software from a remote client to a server, mystandard connection:Provider=SQLOLEDB.1;Persist Security Info=False;UserID=sa;Password=;Initial Catalog=MyDb;DataSource=192.168.0.100;Network=DBMSSOCN;andProvider=SQLOLEDB.1;Persist Security Info=False;UserID=sa;Password=;Initial Catalog=MyDb;DataSource=192.168.0.100;Network=DBNMPNTW;make a error connection,i have tryed with ODBC connection and its OK only in Named Piped.Can any one help me write the right connection string?thanksrm
Can I know somedetail about why the Sqlservr.exe app increasing in size drastically. Even I check all parameter of the server and I check the process running on server.
I feel server is not releasing the queues and It is occupying the memory. I any one suggest what could be the cause ?
I am having trouble increasing the size of the log device on a SQL 6.5 database. When I use SQL Enterprise Manager I get an error saying that the device has 0 MBs available. When I use the ALTER DB statement I get an error saying that there is not enough space on the disk, but I know this not to be the case. Has anyone any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Michael lawlor
I have a database with 1 .mdf data file and 1 .ldf t-log file. There are multiple inserts/deletes/transactions performed on the data daily, but the size of the two files remains constant (5,774,,336 and 153,480 respectively)??? I perform daily full backups and hourly T-log backups (during business hours of 9-6) and these backup files change size, but why aren't my physical DB files changing? I have them set to auto-grow at 10% unrestricted...
Hello Experts,I make a connection with .Net Sqlclient Data Provider tomy server and I adjust the min pool size = 0, but when Icheck the sysprocesses I see that 2 connections have beenmade. Why is that? am I missing something here?Conn. string"server=MYSERVER;user id=sa;database=MYDB;min poolsize=0;max pool size=10;packet size=3072;ApplicationName=MYAPP"Thanks in advanceMichas KonstantinosSQL Sewrver Developer, DBA*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
I just can't get it to connect to the database. Says something that remote connections are not allowed. I've done the Area thing and allowed all connection including remote connections.
Would anyone have any suggestions/advice on how to determine what is causing the memory usage for sqlserver.exe to increase a dramatic pace in windows task manager? What would be a good resolution to slow down this memory usage? Thanks!
Out techs informed me that they are getting reports of a system slow down. When they look, they find sqlserver.exe has lots of memory allocated to it. They reboot the server and then it runs okay for a few weeks. They tell me this just started happening recently.
SQLServer itself has not been touched in months. They are, however, starting to use one of the databases heavier.
I found a setting where you can set max_server_memory. Any problems if I set this to a value?
Is there a way to increase the size of the procedure cache. Or is it only a auto configuring option. I have 2gb of memory, and when I check the size of the procedure cache it is just 10mb. I would like to increase this to around 50mb. Not sure if there is an setting to do this. Had a look on BOL could not find anything.
Just wondering if you could help me on this one. I'm not sure if mytransaction logs are behaving oddly or what. I've successfuly managedto shrink my transaction logs from 7GB down to 1MB and now I find itstrange that the log file doesn't seem to increase its size. Thetimestamp of the logfile is updating as well. But the size of the fileis constant. I haven't configured my database to do auto-shrink so Imreally confused why it hasn't changed its size for more than a monthnow.Hope I'm not losing any data here.Kindly advise.
i have a very big database and number of people are working on it.. it's log file size is increaseing very day too much.. i am taking log back every 30mint...
i dont' know that wethare i need to truncate the log file after taking the log file backup or not.. i am taking differentail backup every day and full backup every week...
Please tell me do i need to trucate the log file to reduce the file size or i hv to leave as it....
I have a site which provides online studying for students in a graduate program. Apparently their final was today because lastnight everybody was on. I know, however, that this is a small class, so no more than about 80 people could be on the site at one time. I still got SQL errors (emailed to me from Application_Error). I read on MSDN that by default connection pooling should be in place, with a pool size of 100... that would mean I wouldn't have this problem if only 80 students were on the site.
Why is this happening?
Below is my connection string from web.config. <add key="connStr" value="Server=xxxxxx;Database=xxxx;UID=xxx;PWD=xxx;"></add>Error: System.InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.
When using connection string connect to sql server, there is a item max pool size. The default is 100. I set it to 500, but still get max pool size is reached and timeout error.
I checked my code and do open and close each connection each time using connection, so should have no memory leak.
What is the maximun value for max pool size? how to calc this size based on the memory used by SQL Server?
I'm writing a java application that queries sqlserver 2005 (and 2000). In case the sql browser service is stopped I need to use the named pipe property or the port property, right? But how could the program know at runtime what is the port and what is the pipe name? And how should a connection string to sqlserver 2005 (and 2000) that includes named pipe, look like?
I am using SQL Server 2000 with replication object for two location. Log size on publisher go upto 25 times of data file size, I mean 80 MB Data files has maintains 2 GB log file and it is same for all five co's working on same windows 2000 advanced server board.
Since last week server randamly get disconnected from user applications and at that time few tables are not openable at server.
Can any one give a reason ? Why this type misbehaviou done by SQL Server 2000?
I am working on a large application built on the 1.1 framework in VS2003 (SQL Server 2000 DB) and keep getting this error: 'Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached'. I can run the app in Debug 10 consecutive times, doing the exact same thing every time, and the error will occur at 10 different points, and 10 different calls to the data-access layer. There is a data-access layer that is responsible for executing sql statements and stored procs. Every function in the data-access layer handles connections in the following way: Try ' setup data adapter da.Fill(ds, "ResultSet") Return dsCatch ex As Exception ' send the exception back to the client Throw exFinally ' release objects da.Dispose() conn.Close() : conn.Dispose()End Try I have read numerous posts about making sure not to leak connections. I have watched the connections within the SQL Activity Monitor and, at the most, there are 5 connections open at any given time. I use the default timeout and pool size values (30 sec. and 100 connections) in my connection strings. I am 99% positive that I am not leaking connections. Are there any other explanations for why this is happening?
I have a database which is centered around two date tables (approx. 5.5 million records each). We are finally making the big leap from SQL Server 2005 to 2012. The data is currently stored as datetime, and we are hoping to take advantage of the new date datatype, since the time component is not needed.
The first table has 13 different date columns. In testing on the 2012 server I have changed 3 columns so far, and have seen that changing the datatype to date is actually increasing the Index size and not affecting the data size. Only 3 of the columns are associated with indexes, and modifying a non-indexed column still increased the index size. I am running the Disk Usage by Table report to view the sizes.
I have a stored proc eg spProcA which does not start a transaction
If I call this proc from ado.net code without any transaction around it affecting the isolation level, the isolation level within the proc call is read committed, as expected
If I then call the same proc within a System.Transacstion.TransactionScope with a different isolation level eg Serializable, then i get the expected isolation level in the proc.
However, if i retry the proc without any transaction around it, the isolation level is now the same as the TransactionScope, (eg Serializable), and this persists until either the connection pool clears down (either because it becomes dormant or via an explicit ClearAllPools.
I can resolve this problem by setting the isolation level in every proc (or call to every proc), but i wondered if i am missing something more straight forward?
I build an asp.net 2.0 (VS 2005) web application and put it on the server. The installed SQL server is SQL server 2003. I get this error message when i keep the application running for 10 or 15 mins. "Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occure because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached." I made the server timeout unlimited but the error keeps coming up after some time of openning the application. The application session time out redirects the user to the login page and doesn't throw an error like the one i mentioned above. Any idea. Thanks in advance.
hello to all my problem is when in database it reaches nearly 100 active connections (i check it from detach database) , my application does not allow me to open new browser page and show me error like: time out expire. the max connection pool is reached.
System.InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.
