ok can someone tell me why i get two different answers for the same query. (looking for last day of month for a given date)
SELECT DATEADD(ms, - 3, DATEADD(mm, DATEDIFF(m, 0, CAST('12/20/2006' AS datetime)) + 1, 0)) AS Expr1
FROM testsupplierSCNCR
I am getting the result of 01/01/2007
but in query analizer I get the result of
12/31/2006
Why the different dates
Hi all I'm using Sql server 2000 and sometimes i need to run my Queries in Query analizer before using them in my application just to test them...BUT most of the time when i run a query in query-analizer for second time ,query analizer populates the result (records) more quicker then the first time. Apparently it caches the query !!! i don't know but for some reasons i dont't want this , so how can i prevent Query-analizer from doing so?
Thanks in advance. Regards.
HI
I am quite new in query building so I would like to know where can I find some useful information about if, for,.. clauses to use in query analizer.
I would like to set a variable for date(datetime) and use it in if, for,...
clause to get results for each day in selected month.For example:
SELECT Uporabnik AS Expr1,
MIN(Ura) AS Expr3, MAX(Ura) AS Expr5, COUNT(*) AS Expr4, Datum AS Expr2
FROM BatchIndeksNEW
GROUP BY Uporabnik, Datum
HAVING (Datum = CONVERT(DATETIME, '2001-11-30 00:00:00', 102))
ORDER BY COUNT(*) DESC
thank's Tomaz
Greetings,
I've been sent an alternative "Query Analizer" thingy to play with and it seems to do the job - but it ain't my area.
I've posted the tool in a free public place for a short time:
http://www.adoanywhere.com/members/yeohray/7C1_SQLTool.zip
But, for the benefit of people reding this from the archives, please follow
the registerable author link [ http://81.130.213.94/myforum/forum_posts.asp?TID=78&PN=1&TPN=1 ]
Apart from needing documentation (we all know about that old scenario) it seems good.
It didn't waste my time (and I wouldn't waste yours I hope). Could I have your comments please ?
Also, I'm looking for other tools that do the same as this one - so I can compare functionality. Even without try the freebie, any links please ?
TIA
I'm trying to find the command to open up an odbc conection inside sql2005 express. I only have ues of an odbc connector, we're conection to remedy. We will eventually be using stored procedures to extract the data we need from remedy and doing additional data crunching. I'm a foxpro programmer so once I get the correct syntax for making the odbc connector I shold be ok. Also I need a really good advanced book on sql2005. The type of book that would have my odbc answer. I've spent all morning trying to find this information and was unable to.
Thanks in advance
Daniel Buchanan.
If this was the wrong forum to post this on, please move this question to the correct one. I need this answer soon.
-- The 3rd query uses an incorrect column name in a sub-query and succeeds but rows are incorrectly qualified. This is very DANGEROUS!!!
-- The issue exists is in 2008 R2, 2012 and 2014 and is "By Design"
set nocount on
go
if object_id('tempdb.dbo.#t1') IS NOT NULL drop table #t1
if object_id('tempdb.dbo
[code]....
This succeeds when the invalid column name is a valid column name in the outer query. So in this situation the sub-query would fail when run by itself but succeed with an incorrectly applied filter when run as a sub-query. The danger here is that if a SQL Server user runs DML in a production database with such a sub-query which then the results are likely not the expected results with potentially unintended actions applied against the data. how many SQL Server users have had incorrectly applied DML or incorrect query results and don't even know it....?
For each customer, I want to add all of their telephone numbers to a different column. That is, multiple columns (depending on the number of telephone numbers) for each customer/row. How can I achieve that?
I want my output to be
CUSTOMER ID, FIRST NAME, LAST NAME, TEL1, TEL2, TEL3, ... etc
Each 'Tel' will relate to a one or more records in the PHONES table that is linked back to the customer.
I want to do it using SELECT. Is it possible?
When I run the following query from Query Analyzer in SQL Serer 2005, I get a message back that says.
Command(s) completed successfully.
What I really need it to do is to display the results of the query. Does anyone know how to do this?
declare @SniierId as uniqueidentifierset @SniierId = '85555560-AD5D-430C-9B97-FB0AC3C7DA1F'declare @SniierAlias as nvarchar(50)declare @AlwaysShowEditButton as bitdeclare @SniierName as nvarchar (128)/* Check access for Sniier */SELECT TOP 1 @SniierName = Sniiers.SniierName, @SniierAlias = Sniiers.SniierAlias, @AlwaysShowEditButton = Sniiers.AlwaysShowEditButtonFROM SniiersWHERE Sniiers.SniierId=@SniierId
I am trying to run queries against any of the user tables in my MS SQL 7.0 database. I get a message the Query Designer encountered a query error.
We have tried rebooting the SQL Server and I am still getting these messages. Also, the SQL error logs look fine - all database
maintenance are running successfully including the DBCCs which show no errors. Any help would be greatly appreciated as we are to go
into production in a few days.
linking two tables together to get an end result
find below the code i have used
The first part of the query provides me with the info i need
SELECT sub.*,
case when rm_sales_band = '2M to 4M' then 'Kirsty' else RM end as rm
into #rmtmp
[Code].....
I have a query that performs a comparison between 2 different databases and returns the results of the comparison. It returns 2 columns. The 1st column is the value of the object being compared, and the 2nd column is a number representing any discrepancies.What I would like to do is use the results from this 1st query in the where clause of another separate query so that this 2nd query will only run for any primary values from the 1st query where a secondary value in the 1st query is not equal to zero.I was thinking of using an "IN" function in the 2nd query to pull data from the 1st column in the 1st query where the 2nd column in the 1st query != 0, but I'm having trouble ironing out the correct syntax, and conceptualizing this optimally.
While I would prefer to only return values from the 1st query where the comparison value != 0 in order to have a concise list to work with, I am having difficulty in that the comparison value is a mathematical calculation of 2 different tables in 2 different databases, and so far I've been forced to include it in the select criteria because the where clause does not accept it.Also, I am not a DBA by trade. I am a system administrator writing SQL code for reporting data from an application I support.
Hi,New to .Net and SQL. I have two tables that I have joined together. RentalControl_Main has the rental informationd and an Adjuster ID that links to the ADjuster table and the adjusters name. I am trying to create a report that gives the "Single" adjuster name and the totals for all of their contracts. I have a details report that gives each contract info. for each specific adjusters rentals. However, I want to just list the adjuster once and give all of their totals. In my SQL statement I have all of it written out and just need to knowwhat to do in place of 'Alex Early' that will give me all of the distinct adjusters.Do I need to code this on the page with a do while loop?Appreciate any help.SELECT SUM(dbo.RentalControl_Main.Rate) / COUNT(dbo.RentalControl_Main.Rate) AS AmtAvg, SUM(dbo.RentalControl_Main.DaysBilled) / COUNT(dbo.RentalControl_Main.DaysBilled) AS DayAvg, SUM(dbo.RentalControl_Main.Rate * dbo.RentalControl_Main.DaysBilled) / COUNT(dbo.RentalControl_Main.Rate) AS TotAvgFROM dbo.RentalControl_Main INNER JOIN dbo.RentalControl_Adjuster ON dbo.RentalControl_Main.AdjusterID = dbo.RentalControl_Adjuster.AdjusterIDWHERE (dbo.RentalControl_Adjuster.AdjusterName = 'Alex Early' AND (dbo.RentalControl_Main.DateClose IS NOT NULL) AND (dbo.RentalControl_Main.AgencyID = '2')
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy goal is to add a diff into a query that grabs data from 2 different tables.
The code:
SELECT
MIN(TableName) as TableName,
ID1, COL1, COL2, COL3, COL4, COL5, COL6, COL7, COL8
,COL9, COL10, COL11, COL12, COL13, COL14, COL15, --COL16,
COL17, COL18, COL19, COL20, COL21
FROM
(
SELECT 'Table A' as TableName,
SessionID as ID1,
StartDateCode as COL1,
StartTimeCode as COL2,
EndDateCode as COL3,
EndTimeCode as COL4,
HandledByCode as COL5,
DispositionCode as COL6,
DNISCode as COL7,
CallServiceQueueCode as COL8,
ApplicationCode as COL9,
IVREndPointCode as COL10,
BankCode as COL11,
TotalQueueTimeSS as COL12,
TotalAgentTalkTimeSS as COL13,
TotalAgentHoldTimeSS as COL14,
TotalAgentHandleTimeSS as COL15,
--TotalIVRTimeSS as COL16,
AfterHoursFlag as COL17,
SourceSystemID as COL18,
anubisTransferExtNumber as COL19,
anubisEndPoint as COL20,
AccountNumber as COL21
from [pdx0sql45].Rubicon_Marts.dbo.INB_Call_Fact
where startdatecode between 2738 and 2769
UNION all
SELECT 'Table B' as TableName,
SessionID as ID1,
StartDateCode as COL1,
StartTimeCode as COL2,
EndDateCode as COL3,
EndTimeCode as COL4,
HandledByCode as COL5,
DispositionCode as COL6,
DNISCode as COL7,
CallServiceQueueCode as COL8,
ApplicationCode as COL9,
IVREndPointCode as COL10,
BankCode as COL11,
TotalQueueTimeSS as COL12,
TotalAgentTalkTimeSS as COL13,
TotalAgentHoldTimeSS as COL14,
TotalAgentHandleTimeSS as COL15,
--TotalIVRTimeSS as COL16,
AfterHoursFlag as COL17,
SourceSystemID as COL18,
anubisTransferExtNumber as COL19,
anubisEndPoint as COL20,
AccountNumber as COL21
from pdx0sql04.Rubicon_Marts.dbo.INB_Call_Fact
where startdatecode between 2738 and 2769
) tmp
GROUP BY ID1, COL1, COL2, COL3, COL4, COL5, COL6, COL7, COL8
,COL9, COL10, COL11, COL12, COL13, COL14, COL15, --COL16,
COL17, COL18, COL19, COL20, COL21
HAVING COUNT(*) = 1
ORDER BY 2,1
---------
Is it possible to add a command into the query to output diff/compare scenario?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Hi @all,
I designed a query in report designer, data tab. This query runs 24 secs, when I execute it from the data tab in report designer.
Publishing the report and running it from the report server. The query needs 40x the time as in report designer.
Looking at the Execution Log, the report needs 800 secs for TimeDataRetrieval.
Why is it so much slower to run the query from report server? The report designer has also to retrieve the data, and runs so much faster.
Thanks for any hints
T
Hi.I'm trying but not getting correct results.I have two tablesone with app, msg, time(varchar,datetime,varchar)app1 start 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app1 stuff 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app1 end 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app1 start 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app2 start 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app2 stuff 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app2 end 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app2 start 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app3 start 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app2 end 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app2 start 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app2 end 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app2 start 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app2 end 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app3 end 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app1 end 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000and another with dr watson crash info(varchar, datetime)app1 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app2 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app1 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app1 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000app3 2006-04-03 13:33:36.000I'm trying to make a query that will allowme to see what entries in the first tableoccurred wtihin, say, a minute, or maybe 40seconds of any of the entries in the secondtable.I want all the entries in the second table tobe present, so I know it has to be some sortof join, probably an outer join.my syntax is giving me bad results, probablybecause I'm just out of practice.can someone tell me how to put a query togetherso I see the data I'm looking for?ThanksJeffJeff Kish
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have two tables table1 and table2 and having a common column "col1"
When i ran the following query
UPDATE table1, table2 SET col1=FALSE WHERE id = 1;
getting the following error
Error Code: 1052
Column 'col1' in field list is ambiguous
id column exist in both the tables and need to update both the tables to false where the id is equivalent to 1.
Hi group,I have a select statement that if run against a 1 million recorddatabase directly in query analyzer takes less than 1 second.However, if I execute the select statement in a stored procedureinstead, calling the stored proc from query analyzer, then it takes12-17 seconds.Here is what I execute in Query Analyzer when bypassing the storedprocedure:USE VerizonGODECLARE @phonenumber varchar(15)SELECT @phonenumber = '6317898493'SELECT Source_Identifier,BADD_Sequence_Number,Record_Type,BAID ,Social_Security_Number ,Billing_Name,Billing_Address_1,Billing_Address_2,Billing_Address_3,Billing_Address_4,Service_Connection_Date,Disconnect_Date,Date_Final_Bill,Behavior_Score,Account_Group,Diconnect_Reason,Treatment_History,Perm_Temp,Balance_Due,Regulated_Balance_Due,Toll_Balance_Due,Deregulated_Balance_Due,Directory_Balance_Due,Other_Category_BalanceFROM BadDebtWHERE (Telephone_Number = @phonenumber) OR (Telephone_Number_Redef =@phonenumber)order by Service_Connection_Date descRETURNGOHere is what I execute in Query Analyzer when calling the storedprocedure:DECLARE @phonenumber varchar(15)SELECT @phonenumber = '6317898493'EXEC Verizon.dbo.baddebt_phonelookup @phonenumberHere is the script that created the stored procedure itself:CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.baddebt_phonelookup @phonenumber varchar(15)ASSELECT Source_Identifier,BADD_Sequence_Number,Record_Type,BAID ,Social_Security_Number ,Billing_Name,Billing_Address_1,Billing_Address_2,Billing_Address_3,Billing_Address_4,Service_Connection_Date,Disconnect_Date,Date_Final_Bill,Behavior_Score,Account_Group,Diconnect_Reason,Treatment_History,Perm_Temp,Balance_Due,Regulated_Balance_Due,Toll_Balance_Due,Deregulated_Balance_Due,Directory_Balance_Due,Other_Category_BalanceFROM BadDebtWHERE (Telephone_Number = @phonenumber) OR (Telephone_Number_Redef =@phonenumber)order by Service_Connection_Date descRETURNGOUsing SQL Profiler, I also have the execution trees for each of thesetwo different ways of running the same query.Here is the Execution tree when running the whole query in theanalyzer, bypassing the stored procedure:--------------------------------------Sort(ORDER BY:([BadDebt].[Service_Connection_Date] DESC))|--Bookmark Lookup(BOOKMARK:([Bmk1000]),OBJECT:([Verizon].[dbo].[BadDebt]))|--Sort(DISTINCT ORDER BY:([Bmk1000] ASC))|--Concatenation|--IndexSeek(OBJECT:([Verizon].[dbo].[BadDebt].[Telephone_Index]),SEEK:([BadDebt].[Telephone_Number]=[@phonenumber]) ORDERED FORWARD)|--IndexSeek(OBJECT:([Verizon].[dbo].[BadDebt].[Telephone_Redef_Index]),SEEK:([BadDebt].[Telephone_Number_Redef]=[@phonenumber]) ORDEREDFORWARD)--------------------------------------Finally, here is the execution tree when calling the stored procedure:--------------------------------------Sort(ORDER BY:([BadDebt].[Service_Connection_Date] DESC))|--Filter(WHERE:([BadDebt].[Telephone_Number]=[@phonenumber] OR[BadDebt].[Telephone_Number_Redef]=[@phonenumber]))|--Compute Scalar(DEFINE:([BadDebt].[Telephone_Number_Redef]=substring(Convert([BadDebt].[Telephone_Number]),1, 10)))|--Table Scan(OBJECT:([Verizon].[dbo].[BadDebt]))--------------------------------------Thanks for any help on my path to optimizing this query for ourproduction environment.Regards,Warren WrightScorex Development Team
View 5 Replies View Related
Hi,
I have Table A . we already have 80 columns . we have to add 65 more columns.
we are populating this table from oracle .and we need to populate those 65 columns again from the same table.
Is it a better idea to add those new 65 columns to the same table or new table.
If we go for the same table then loading time will be double, If I go for new table and If i am able to run both the packages which loads table data from same oracle server to difffrent sql tables then we should be good. But if we run in to temp space issues on oracle server . Then i have to load the two tables separately which consumes the same time as earlier one.
I was thinking if there is a way in SSIS where I can pull data from same oracle table in to two diff sql tables at same time?
Not sure if this is possible, but maybe. I have a table that contains a bunch of logs.
I'm doing something like SELECT * FROM LOGS. The primary key in this table is LogID.
I have another table that contains error messages. Each LogID could have multiple error messages associated with it. To get the error messages.
When I perform my first select query listed above, I would like one of the columns to be populated with ALL the error messages for that particular LogID (SELECT * FROM ERRORS WHERE LogID = MyLogID).
Any thoughts as to how I could accomplish such a daring feat?
hi, like, if i need to do delete some items with the id = 10000 then also need to update on the remaining items on the with the same idthen i will need to go through all the records to fetch the items with the same id right? so, is there something that i can use to hold those records so that i can do the delete and update just on those records and don't need to query twice? or is there a way to do that in one go ?thanks in advance!
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello. I currently have a website that has a table on one webpage. When a record is clicked, the primary key of that record is transfered in the query string to another page and fed into an sql statement. In this case its selecting a project on the first page, and displaying all the scripts for that project on another page. I also have an additional dropdownlist on the second page that i use to filter the scripts by an attribute called 'testdomain'. At present this works to an extent. When i click a project, i am navigated to the scripts page which is empty except for the dropdownlist. i then select a 'testdomain' from the dropdownlist and the page populates with scripts (formview) for the particular test domain. what i would like is for all the scripts to be displayed using the formview in the first instance when the user arrives at the second page. from there, they can then filter the scripts using the dropdownlist.
My current SQL statement is as follows.
SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [TestScript] WHERE (([ProjectID] = @ProjectID) AND ([TestDomain] = @TestDomain))"
So what is happening is when testdomain = a null value, it does not select any scripts. Is there a way i can achieve the behaivour of the page as i outlined above? Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
James.
I don't know the correct approach to this problem. Nested Queries perhaps?
I have users enter stock symbols into a textbox. The symbols are then written in a table that has 3 columns named UserID, Portfolio_Name and Portfolio_Symbols.
In order to look the symbols up (Portfolio_Symbols), I search by UserID and Portfolio_Name; this returns a string consisting of the symbols.
What I need, however are the results of (another) query based on these symbols(Portfolio_Symbols)--the result would be various pieces of data for each company (symbol)being returned to a dataset that will be read into a datagrid.
Do nested queries seem a good approach, or is there some other way that would be better?
I've never written a nested query before, that's why I ask this question.
Thanks
Hello all,I'm looking for some hints as to how to use the results of a query inanother query. I assume I'm 'thinking' wrong in how to solve this, soI'm hoping someone can clobber me and send me in the right direction.My question is best illustrated by simplified example. I have onetable (table A) with a single column called "Word". This tablecontains 100 records of single words. Another table (table B)contains whole sentences in a single column. I want to eventuallycount the occurances of all of the words in Table A, in each of thesentences in Table B and store these results in another table. Here'sthe 'thinking wrong' part. The only way I can see to do this is toselect the entire table A using a cursor, then select 'LIKE's of theresult against each individual row in table B. This seems horriblyinefficient, and I know there have to be one or two MUCH better waysto do this, but I can't get me head wrapped around thinking in SQL atthis stage. Any info appreciated.Thanks,Stan
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm running a query, actually its an insert that works when using the TSQL below.
However when I try to use the debugger to step through and using the exact same values as those below I get the following error:
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Invalid character value for cast specification
Its Killing me because everything else works, but this. Can somebody help.
DECLARE @NoteID INT,-- NULL OUTPUT,
@Note_Description NVARCHAR(3000),-- = NULL,
@Date DateTime,-- = NULL OUTPUT,
@ByWho NVARCHAR(30),-- = NULL,
@FK_Action_Performed NVARCHAR(40),-- = NULL,
@FK_UserID INT,-- = NULL,
@FK_JobID INT,-- = NULL,
@Job_Date DateTime,-- = NULL,
@Start DateTime,-- = NULL,
@Finish DateTime,-- = NULL,
@BeenRead NVARCHAR(10),-- = NULL
@FK_UserIDList NVARCHAR(4000)-- = NULL
--SET @NoteID = 409 --NULL OUTPUT,
SET @Note_Description = 'Tetsing'
--SET @Date DateTime = NULL OUTPUT,
SET @ByWho = 'GeorgeAgaian'
SET @FK_Action_Performed = 'Worked hard'
SET @FK_UserID = 5
SET @FK_JobID = 29
SET @Job_Date = 28/01/03
SET @Start = '1:00:20 PM'
SET @Finish = '1:00:20 PM'
SET @BeenRead = 'UnRead'
SET @FK_UserIDList = '1,2,3'
--AS
--SET NOCOUNT ON
SET NOCOUNT ON
SET XACT_ABORT ON
BEGIN TRANSACTION
SET @Date = GETDATE()
-- Insert Values into the customer table
INSERT Note (Note_Description,
Date,
ByWho,
FK_Action_Performed,
FK_UserID,
FK_JobID,
Job_Date,
Start,
Finish)
SELECT --@NoteID,
@Note_Description,
@Date,
@ByWho,
@FK_Action_Performed,
@FK_UserID,
@FK_JobID,
@Job_Date,
@Start,
@Finish
-- Get the new Customer Identifier, return as OUTPUT param
SELECT @NoteID = @@IDENTITY
-- Insert new notes for all the users that the note pertains to, in this case this will be by the assigned
-- users.
IF @FK_UserIDList IS NOT NULL
EXECUTE spInsertNotesByAssignedUsers @NoteID, @FK_UserIDList
-- Insert New Address record
-- Retrieve Address reference into @AddressId
-- EXEC spInsertForUserNote
-- @FK_UserID,
--@NoteID,
-- @BeenRead
-- @Fax,
-- @PKId,
-- @AddressId OUTPUT
COMMIT TRANSACTION
--------------------------------------------------
GO
Hi, not exactly too sure if this can be done but I have a need to run a query which will return a list of values from 1 column. Then I need to iterate this list to produce the resultset for return.
This is implemented as a stored procedure
declare @OwnerIdent varchar(7)
set @OwnerIdent='A12345B'
SELECT table1.val1 FROM table1 INNER JOIN table2
ON table1. Ident = table2.Ident
WHERE table2.Ident = @OwnerIdent
'Now for each result of the above I need to run the below query
SELECT Clients.Name , Clients.Address1 ,
Clients.BPhone, Clients.email
FROM Clients INNER JOIN Growers ON Clients.ClientKey = Growers.ClientKey
WHERE Growers.PIN = @newpin)
'@newpin being the result from first query
Any help appreciated
I was wondering if there was a keyword that would allow you to return the number of results from a query such as (this is fake just giving an example so that someone can give me the real answer)
select TotalReturned
from table
where field=""
I am a beginner with SQL, so please excuse any ignorance here.
Under SQL 6.5, when executing a SELECT DISTINCT query against a table in a certain database, the results were returned alphabetized. Now, after migrating the database to SQL 7.0, the same query does not return the results alphabetized. If I add an index for the column specified in the query to the table, the results come back alphabetized. Is there any way to correct this other than adding indexes for all columns in all tables that are queried in this manner?
TIA,
Paige
I am running the same exact query in SQL 2000 and I get different results. Should I try running DBCC CHECKDB and look for errors?
View 5 Replies View Related
Hi,
I have this line of code that when run in the query doesn't return anything:
srv.AGENT_S_ACC_CODE IN ('" & Replace(Replace(Parameters!arcode.Value," ",""),",","','") & "')
The parameter is setup and the query works when I hardcode it with a value but will not return anything with this, does anyone know why?
Thanks,
Rhonda
anybody can help me how to get into the SQL Query Manager. I downloaded already the MSSQL Server 2000 and it's already running.
efren
Hi guys, say i wrote a query that returns 1,000 records.. what kinda query could i write that only returns say the first 50 records of the 1,000 recs..
View 4 Replies View RelatedHello,
I want to select all the customerIDs where an email address exists. Easy: select customerid from customers where emailaddress = @emailaddress
Now I want to use the resulted customerIDs from the above query as a parameter to select all the email addresses with emailstatus equal to 3.
How do I create this type of while statement in a stored procedure? I prefer to not create a temporary table.
My idea was to do it like this:
select emailaddress from emailaddresseswhere emailstatus = 3 and customerid = (select customerid from customers where emailaddress = @emailaddress)
This doesn't seems to work. I get the error:
Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
thanks
I have a pretty big SQL query with a one to many sort of relationship...
There are client accounts that we're reporting on. Each account has four different historical categories attached. Each historical category can have maybe fifty entries in each, sorted by date.
I need to figure out how to grab the unique accounts and show only the three most recent results per each historical subcategory with the account... the three most current results from each of the four subcategories, displayed by the parent client account number.
I've created four views to isolate the subcategories as a start, thinking I could bring them into a parent query ...
but my question would be... how do I generate JUST the top three historical transactions by account number? If I select TOP 3, I get only the 3 newest in the MASTER LIST, not per client account, which is what I need to do.
Does this make sense? I could really use a good SQL helping hand with this one.
Thank you!