Serializable Read And Lock Mode

Jul 20, 2005

Hi,

Version Info: SQLSERVER 2000 SP3

I am trying to understand how SQL Server works with SERIALIZABLE read.
I am fairly new to SQL Server, having mainly worked with Informix.
We are getting lock timeout error in our application. Our lock timeout
is set to 20 seconds. I am trying to investigate why locks are held for
such a long time in the first place.

I believe SQLServer tries to put keylocks as much as possible for
ensuring serializibility. For e.g.
SELECT column_b
from table_a
where column_c between 1000 and 1100

what if column_c has no index. Does it switch over the data row.
And what if a table has no index. Will it go for table lock, as it
use to do in earlier versions.

TIA.

--

email id is bogus

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Error: A Deadlock Was Detected While Trying To Lock Variable X For Read Access. A Lock Could Not Be Acquired After 16 Attempts

Feb 2, 2007

I simply made my script task (or any other task) fail

In my package error handler i have a Exec SQL task - for Stored Proc

SP statement is set in following expression (works fine in design time):

"EXEC [dbo].[us_sp_Insert_STG_FEED_EVENT_LOG] @FEED_ID= " + (DT_WSTR,10) @[User::FEED_ID] + ", @FEED_EVENT_LOG_TYPE_ID = 3, @STARTED_ON = '"+(DT_WSTR,30)@[System::StartTime] +"', @ENDED_ON = NULL, @message = 'Package failed. ErrorCode: "+(DT_WSTR,10)@[System::ErrorCode]+" ErrorMsg: "+@[System::ErrorDescription]+"', @FILES_PROCESSED = '" + @[User::t_ProcessedFiles] + "', @PKG_EXECUTION_ID = '" + @[System::ExecutionInstanceGUID] + "'"

From progress:

Error: The Script returned a failure result.
Task SCR REIL Data failed

OnError - Task SQL Insert Error Msg
Error: A deadlock was detected while trying to lock variable "System::ErrorCode, System::ErrorDescription, System::ExecutionInstanceGUID, System::StartTime, User::FEED_ID, User::t_ProcessedFiles" for read access. A lock could not be acquired after 16 attempts and timed out.
Error: The expression ""EXEC [dbo].[us_sp_Insert_STG_FEED_EVENT_LOG] @FEED_ID= " + (DT_WSTR,10) @[User::FEED_ID] + ", @FEED_EVENT_LOG_TYPE_ID = 3, @STARTED_ON = '"+(DT_WSTR,30)@[System::StartTime] +"', @ENDED_ON = NULL, @message = 'Package failed. ErrorCode: "+(DT_WSTR,10)@[System::ErrorCode]+" ErrorMsg: "+@[System::ErrorDescription]+"', @FILES_PROCESSED = '" + @[User::t_ProcessedFiles] + "', @PKG_EXECUTION_ID = '" + @[System::ExecutionInstanceGUID] + "'"" on property "SqlStatementSource" cannot be evaluated. Modify the expression to be valid.

Warning: The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (4) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure. This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors.

And how did I get 4 errors? - I only set my script task result to failure

View 11 Replies View Related

ERROR: A Variable May Only Be Added Once To Either The Read Lock List Or The Write Lock List.

May 22, 2006

Hi,
I have set of 2 DTS packages, one of which calls the other by forming a command-line (dtexec) using a Execute Process task.

From the parent package-> Execute Process Task->
dtsexec /F etc... /<pkg variable> = "servername"

Each of the parent and the called package have a variable: "User::DWServerSQLInstance" which is mapped to the SQL server connection manager server name property using an expression. The outer package has the above variable and so does the inner called package (which gets assigned through the command line from the outerpackage call to inner)

I "sometimes" get the following error:

OnError,I4,TESTDOMAdministrator,ACDWAggregation,{A1F8E43F-15F1-4685-8C18-6866AB31E62B},{77B2F3C7-6756-46EB-8C01-D880598FB4B3},5/22/2006 5:10:28 PM,5/22/2006 5:10:28 PM,-1073659822,0x,The variable "User::DWServerSQLInstance" is already on the read list. A variable may only be added once to either the read lock list or the write lock list.

Help would be appreciated!

I have seen other posts on this but, not able to relate the solution to my scenario.

View 9 Replies View Related

A Variable May Only Be Added Once To Either The Read Lock List Or The Write Lock List

May 10, 2006

Hi All,



I have seen a few other people have this error.

Package works fine when run from BIDS, DTExec, dtexecui. When I schedule it, It get these random errors. (See below)

The main culprit is a variable called "RecordsetFileDIR" which is set using an expression. (@[User::_ROOT] + "RecordSets\")

A number of other variables use this as part of their expression and as they all fail, pretty much everything dies.

I have installed SP1 (Not Beta) on server. Package uses config files to set the value of _ROOT.



The error does not always seem to be with this particular variable though. Always a variable that uses an expression but errors are random. Also, It will run 3 out of 10 times without a problem. I am the only person on the server at the time.

Any ideas?



Cheers,

Crispin



Error log:

OnError,,,POSBasketImport,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1073659822,0x,The variable "User::RecordsetFileDIR" is already on the read list. A variable may only be added once to either the read lock list or the write lock list.

OnError,,,POSBasketImport,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1073639420,0x,The expression for variable "rsHeaderFile" failed evaluation. There was an error in the expression.

OnError,,,DF_Header_Header,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636247,0x,Accessing variable "User::rsHeaderFile" failed with error code 0xC00470EA.

OnError,,,Move All Data,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636247,0x,Accessing variable "User::rsHeaderFile" failed with error code 0xC00470EA.

OnError,,,Load Open Batches and Process Files,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636247,0x,Accessing variable "User::rsHeaderFile" failed with error code 0xC00470EA.

OnError,,,POSBasketImport,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636247,0x,Accessing variable "User::rsHeaderFile" failed with error code 0xC00470EA.

OnError,,,DF_Header_Header,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636390,0x,The file name is not properly specified. Supply the path and name to the raw file either directly in the FileName property or by specifying a variable in the FileNameVariable property.

OnError,,,Move All Data,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636390,0x,The file name is not properly specified. Supply the path and name to the raw file either directly in the FileName property or by specifying a variable in the FileNameVariable property.

OnError,,,Load Open Batches and Process Files,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636390,0x,The file name is not properly specified. Supply the path and name to the raw file either directly in the FileName property or by specifying a variable in the FileNameVariable property.

OnError,,,POSBasketImport,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636390,0x,The file name is not properly specified. Supply the path and name to the raw file either directly in the FileName property or by specifying a variable in the FileNameVariable property.

OnError,,,DF_Header_Header,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1073450901,0x,"component "rsHeader" (365)" failed validation and returned validation status "VS_ISBROKEN".

OnError,,,Move All Data,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1073450901,0x,"component "rsHeader" (365)" failed validation and returned validation status "VS_ISBROKEN".

OnError,,,Load Open Batches and Process Files,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1073450901,0x,"component "rsHeader" (365)" failed validation and returned validation status "VS_ISBROKEN".

OnError,,,POSBasketImport,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1073450901,0x,"component "rsHeader" (365)" failed validation and returned validation status "VS_ISBROKEN".

View 1 Replies View Related

Deadlock And Lock Mode Questions

Oct 17, 2007



I have a deadlock that I can't figure out. Both processes are doing a select from the same table. The owner mode on both is IX and the request mode is S. The lock is a Page Lock.

How do I resolve this?

View 14 Replies View Related

Read Commited Data With Out Lock

May 20, 2008

Hi All

Is there a way in SQL to query the data with out locking.

My intention is to read commited data with out locking

Thanks

View 8 Replies View Related

Is It Possible To Read Data From A Table With Exclusive Lock ?

Sep 4, 2006

Hello,

We currently use SQL Serv 2000 with an ERP application and VB applications.

Both system work with the same database & tables but the ERP application seems to put exclusive lock on all tables it needs during processes. So our VB applications are not able to read these data and we receive TIMEOUT error.

What can I do ?

thank you

Nico

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Read A Value From Table And Increment It By 1 - Row Lock

May 12, 2015

I have a requirement to read a value from table and increment it by 1. There can be multi-threads doing the same operation and would need a ROW LOCK so that read and write both are atomic. How can i put an exclusive lock on the row before I read the value from the table.

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblOnboardingSequence](
[OnboardingSequenceID] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL,
[Name] [nvarchar](255) NOT NULL,
[NextNumber] [bigint] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_OnboardingSequence] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED(
[OnboardingSequenceID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]

GO

My Stored Procedure has below logic

DECLARE @NextNumber BIGINT
----------- Acquire row lock here
SELECT @NextNumber = NextNumber FROM tblOnboardingSequence WHERE Name = 'TPO'
UPDATE tblOnboardingSequence SET NextNumber = @NextNumber + 1 WHERE Name = 'TPO'
----------- Release row lock here

I would like to have a row lock for the row having Name "TPO" before SELECT query and release after UPDATE query.
What si the best way to deal with this?

View 2 Replies View Related

Connecting In Read-only Mode

Feb 18, 2008

I posted this as a reply to another thread but then noticed it was marked as 'Answered' so i figured I'll create a new one.

This is a known issue (i guess) that you need to have write access to the database your connecting to but I actually want to know how to connect to a database with read only permissions. This should not be that rare of a case where you only want to read something without writting to it. I have a system where users can connect to other databases and "import" data from there but if the user doesn't have write access or the file is read only I get an exception.

Any idea how I can connect in read-only mode?

Thanks!

View 1 Replies View Related

Databases Starting Up In Read-only Mode.

Jul 25, 2000

Hi,

About a month ago, a couple of our databases started up in read-only mode for some reason. I am the new DBA on the job, and the error logs from a month ago are not present.

I was wondering if anyone has had a problem where a SQLServer 7.0 database did this to them? We restart our DBs each day using scripts, so it is odd that this happens only intermittently (no one has seen a pattern at this point).

Any information would be muc appreciated!

Thanks,

Joe

View 4 Replies View Related

How Can I Get A Database Out Of Standby/Read-only Mode?

Jan 16, 2008

How can I get a SQL Server 2005 database out of Standby/Read-only mode? I just restored this DB sent from a customer and it is in Standby/Read-only mode. I need to add a user so that I can authenticate from my app for testing purpose.

Thx

View 9 Replies View Related

Database Shows In Read Only Mode ?

Apr 7, 2007

Database shows in read only mode when I did try to restore my database.But How to can I convert it to online mode?



pls help

View 1 Replies View Related

Attach Db From Installer (only Read Mode)

Sep 19, 2007

Hi,
I have made setup of my program,
I need to attach a db to the server. To do this:
- Copy mdf and ldf files into default data folder of instance of sqlexpress
- run scrip from custom action in the installer that:
a. attach the db
b. create login
c. create user for login in db

There is a problem...I run script slq file by sqlcmd and launch it from a c# process.

The rusult is that the db was attacched but in only read mode, and the point c not work.

If I execute manually the same script sql with sqlcmd in dos window, it work without problem in all point: a,b and c

What are the reason of this?

I think that start process in c# not work correctly....this is the code:


process = new Process();



process.StartInfo.FileName = "sqlcmd.exe";

process.StartInfo.Arguments = commandLine;



process.Start();

process.WaitForExit();

help me, plese!
thanks in advance

andrea

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server Admin 2014 :: Log Shipping With Read Only Mode?

May 6, 2014

we are about to start a logshipping with the secondary server in read only mode.

I just wanted to know the disadvantages of using a read only on the secondary server.

I mean whether the transactional logs will be restored periodically or it won't be restored till users are connected on the secondary server.

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server Admin 2014 :: Can Have Secondary Replica As Read / Write Mode?

Oct 14, 2014

We have a reporting database which is refreshed daily from prod backup and later creating new tables/views/indexes as part of the refresh job. Is there a better approach we can implement in sql 2012/2014 for this scenario since we are planning to migrate to sql2014.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cannot Put Database In Offline Mode Because Lock Could Not Be Placed On Database

Sep 12, 2011

One annoying problem has occurred....I want to put database in offline mode....but it is giving me some error...

"ALTER DATABASE failed because a lock could not be placed on database [database]. Try again later. ALTER DATABASE statement failed. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 5061)" ...

View 7 Replies View Related

SERIALIZABLE TRANSACTION Getting Blocked?

Jun 10, 2004

Hi guys,

I have a stored procedure which generates the next sequence number...
it uses SERIALIZABLE Option. procs look something like below..

begin
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
BEGIN TRANSACTION

Sequence generating statement...

COMMIT TRANSACTION
set @NextSequenceValue = @NextSequenceValue
Return @NextSequenceValue
end

For some reason when i call the proc with below parameters to get next sequence number.. its hungs up..


declare @NextSequenceValue int
set @NextSequenceValue = 0
exec spGetNextSequence 19, 'LotSequence', @NextSequenceValue output, Null
select @NextSequenceValue as NextSequenceValue


When i queried sp_who2 it shows that my processid is blocked by some other processid.. and when i do DBCC INPUTBUFFER (blockingprocessid), the query of blocking processid and my nextsequence generation stored proc is not realted at all..

Can you help shed some light on why my nextsequence generating proc is getting hunged...?

help is appericated..

View 4 Replies View Related

Isolation Level Serializable

Jul 4, 2005

Hi all,
can anyone give me more information on
set transaction isolation level serializable ?? I want to prove some lock to use on online insert and update.
Thank you every much.

View 14 Replies View Related

Serializable Transactions And Insert.

Jul 23, 2005

Hi,I have a problem using serializable transactions. In one transaction Iselect a single specific row from a table using a where clause (thiscauses it to acquire and hold a range lock). In another transaction Iattempt to insert a new row into the table (which does not match thefirst transactions where clause), but it is blocked by the firsttransaction. The reading I have done on SQL Server suggests that Ishould be able to insert rows, as long as the new rows do not match thewhere clause in the other transactions select.Here is what I do:Transaction 1SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SerializableBEGIN TRANSACTIONselect * from test_table where id=1;and then on another session I runTransaction 2SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SerializableBEGIN TRANSACTIONinsert into test_table values (2, 'two');Transaction 2 cannot complete until transaction 1 has finished. I havetried using WITH (ROWLOCK) hints but to no avail. Am I missingsomething important? Is this true of other DBs?(I am able to update rows that are not in transaction 1's where clause)I am using SQL Server version 8.00.760(SP3).Thanks for your help,Magnus.

View 3 Replies View Related

Read Only Database Restore Bringing Database In Single User Mode?

May 9, 2012

I'm taking a database(read-only) backup from one server and restoring it on other server. As soon as restore is done it is bringing database into single-user read-only mode.

why it is bringing the database into single user mode ?

View 1 Replies View Related

SERIALIZABLE Locks Inside A Trigger?

Oct 25, 2001

I have an insert trigger which has to insert new records into 2 other databases. The first thing it has to do is get a maxid from a table in each of the databases before the insert. i was going to use a SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE statment before getting the ID and then do my insert. My question is two-fold, first is this the best way to do it. And since I have 2 separate selects to get the 2 maxids in the other 2 databases and tables, do I need 2 of these statements inside the trigger, before each insert, or a separate one for each select?
Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005 JDBC Driver V1.2: StreamError Not Serializable

Jan 11, 2008

I'm encountering a problem that seems to be due to the StreamError class not being serializable. This was raised on the JDBC Driver Team blog by Jonas on 10/24/2007. Jimmy Wu notes on 10/29/2007 that it is under investigation. Any progress?

http://blogs.msdn.com/jdbcteam/archive/2007/10/12/microsoft-sql-server-2005-jdbc-driver-v1-2-official-release.aspx#comments

Thanks,
Mike

View 2 Replies View Related

Row Lock Versus Page Lock In SQL 2000.

Apr 7, 2004

Hi
We are facing an acute situation in our web-application. Technology is ASP.NEt/VB.NET, SQL Server 2000.

Consider a scenario in which User 1 is clicking on a button which calls a SQL stored procedure. This procedure selects Group A of records of Database Page1.

At the same time if User 2 also clicks the same button which calls same SQL stored procedure. This procedure selects Group B of records of Database Page1.

So, its the same Page1 but different sets of records. At this moment, both the calls have shared locked on the Page1 inside the procedure.

Now, in call 1, inside the procedure after selecting Group A of records, the next statement is and update to those records. As soon as update statement executes, SQL Server throws a deadlock exception as follows :

Transaction (Process ID 78) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction

We are able to understand why its happening. Its because, Group A and Group B of records are on the same Page1. But both the users have shared lock on the Page1. So, no one gets the exclusive lock in records for update, even though, the records are different.

How can I resolve this issue? How can I get lock on wanted rows instead of entire page?

Please advice. Thanks a bunch.

Pankaj

View 1 Replies View Related

Is It Possible To Switch From Pure Window's Authenticated Mode Ro Mixed Mode? (SQL 2005)

Jan 18, 2007

Durning install I selected Window's Authentication only, but now it seems we may need to use a Mixed Mode with an SA account etc... is there anyway to switch SQL 2005 to use Mixed Mode after the fact?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server Admin 2014 :: SSRS SharePoint Integrated Mode Versus Native Mode

Jul 25, 2014

We have reports in SharePoint integrated mode which are really slow when compared to native mode. I have been asked to research and give info on what exactly causes the delays.

Any articles which give me information as to what happens when a report is run from SharePoint server and where does it log.

View 1 Replies View Related

Query Executes Faster In Grid Mode Than In Text Mode!!

Mar 9, 2000

Hello,everyone!!

There is a query which when executed in the grid mode(ctrl+d) takes approx 0.02 seconds(about 21,000
rows) But when I execute in the text mode, it takes about 0.40 seconds!!
Why is this difference?
Also, when the records from this table are read from a VB application, they are equally slow (as in the text mode!)
Why is it so slow on the text mode & relatively faster in the grid mode?
Has anyone got any idea on ‘Firehose’ style cursor ?(which may speed up access of data in the VB application)

Rgds,
Adie

View 1 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Trigger Database In Suspect Mode And Get It Out To Normal Mode?

Jul 27, 2015

how to put sql server database in suspect mode intensely and  get it out from suspect mode to normal mode.

   i am using SQL server 2008 R2

View 5 Replies View Related

What Is The Fiber Mode(lightweighting Pool Mode) Of SQL Server?

Mar 26, 2005

Recently I read such statments 'When SQL Server is run in "lightweight pooling" mode (fiber mode) and the DTC service is started, unexpected behavior may occur.'
Can someone say anything about fibe mode?I am appreciated for it.:)

View 3 Replies View Related

Local Intranet Mode Versus Internet Mode.

Jul 16, 2007

Hi,



Currently, our Report Builder is running on Local Intranet mode. I'm investigating what the security implications are in changing it to Internet mode. However, I've not been able to find any documentation on this.



Does anyone know of any documentation that addresses this issue or have experience that they can share with changing Report Builder security zone from Intranet mode to Internet mode?



Thanks very much.

View 1 Replies View Related

Mixed Mode To Windows Mode Without Trace....

Jan 3, 2006

Hi folks,

I have a SQL 2005 OTC. CTP version running on Windows 2003 server.

I would like to find out how the SQL server option changed to Windows Authentication mode from Mixed mode over the weekend.  From the SQL log, I don't see when it changed.  I would like to see Date/Time and client IP.  If I can see User ID (windows) that would be great.  Where I can find these info in SQL server?

Thank you in advance...

SHJ

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Lock A Table So Others Cannot Lock It

May 23, 2001

Hi,

I want to lock a table so others cannot lock it but able to read it inside transactions.

The coding I need is something like this: set implicit_transactions on begin transaction select * from table1 with (tablock, holdlock) update table2 set field1 = 'test' commit transaction commit transaction

I have tried the coding above, it won't prevent others from locking table1.

So, I changed the tablock to tablockx to prevent others from locking table1. But this will also prevent others from reading table1. So, how can I lock table1 so others cannot lock it but still able to read it?

Thank you for any help

View 1 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Making Server Database Read / Write From Read Only

Jan 12, 2012

i attached adventure works in sql server 2008 and it showing as read only ,make it read write or remove read only tag from database.

View 11 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Identify Whether Files Are In Read / Write Or Read Only

Mar 24, 2015

How to identify whether the files are in read write or read only?

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved