i have transactional replication setup. recently i found that some of the new records in the publisher are not replicated to subscriber, but the replication is going on as normal with most of the record replicated.
the only this happen is user stop and restart the synchronization.
why this happen, how to find all the records which are not replicated and how to replicate to subscriber now.
Hi All,Have come across something weird and am after some help.Say i run this query where rec_id is a column of table arlhrl,select * from arlhrl where rec_id >= 14260This returns to me 2 records with rec_id's of 14260 and 14261Then I run this queryselect * from arlhrl where rec_id >= 14263This returns 7 records with rec_ids of 14263 up.How come the first query doesn't return the records returned by the2nd query also?If I select for 14262 no records are returned. It is like this is aphantom record or has an end of file character in it.I tried re-creating the indexes but to no avail. If anyone has anyideas about what could be causing it or how to fix it it would be muchappreciated.Thanks in advance,Andrew
View 5 Replies View RelatedWith the function below, I receive this error:Error:Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates that a COMMIT or ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement is missing. Previous count = 1, current count = 0.Function:Public Shared Function DeleteMesssages(ByVal UserID As String, ByVal MessageIDs As List(Of String)) As Boolean Dim bSuccess As Boolean Dim MyConnection As SqlConnection = GetConnection() Dim cmd As New SqlCommand("", MyConnection) Dim i As Integer Dim fBeginTransCalled As Boolean = False
'messagetype 1 =internal messages Try ' ' Start transaction ' MyConnection.Open() cmd.CommandText = "BEGIN TRANSACTION" cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() fBeginTransCalled = True Dim obj As Object For i = 0 To MessageIDs.Count - 1 bSuccess = False 'delete userid-message reference cmd.CommandText = "DELETE FROM tblUsersAndMessages WHERE MessageID=@MessageID AND UserID=@UserID" cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@UserID", UserID)) cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@MessageID", MessageIDs(i).ToString)) cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() 'then delete the message itself if no other user has a reference cmd.CommandText = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tblUsersAndMessages WHERE MessageID=@MessageID1" cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@MessageID1", MessageIDs(i).ToString)) obj = cmd.ExecuteScalar If ((Not (obj) Is Nothing) _ AndAlso ((TypeOf (obj) Is Integer) _ AndAlso (CType(obj, Integer) > 0))) Then 'more references exist so do not delete message Else 'this is the only reference to the message so delete it permanently cmd.CommandText = "DELETE FROM tblMessages WHERE MessageID=@MessageID2" cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@MessageID2", MessageIDs(i).ToString)) cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() End If Next i
' ' End transaction ' cmd.CommandText = "COMMIT TRANSACTION" cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() bSuccess = True fBeginTransCalled = False Catch ex As Exception 'LOG ERROR GlobalFunctions.ReportError("MessageDAL:DeleteMessages", ex.Message) Finally If fBeginTransCalled Then Try cmd = New SqlCommand("ROLLBACK TRANSACTION", MyConnection) cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() Catch e As System.Exception End Try End If MyConnection.Close() End Try Return bSuccess End Function
I want to list out the pending transaction for transaction replication by publication.
Help needed.
Is there a reason why a record in sys.sysuser would be visible to the system admin login but not to a standard user? If I want the standard user to see all the records in sys.sysuser, is there a permission setting I can change to make that happen? If I give the standard user system admin permissions, all records show up. But I cannot keep the standard user as system admin. Thanks.
View 5 Replies View Relatedcan anyone please point me in the right direction as to how to go about rebuilding the transaction log files on a database?
here is the scenario:
1 - transaction log drive failed and transaction log file is basically gone.
2 - database file is fine.
3 - backup is too old or for all intents and purposes non-existent.
the server initially showed the database as suspect. the database was detached and an attempt was made to attach it with a recovered copy of the transaction log file but apparently it was too corrupted and the server didn't like it.
any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
by the way, after looking at some of the posts here, i tried ApexSQL Log and Red-Gate Rescue bundle but these tools seem to require a database to at least show up on the database list, even if it is suspect.
the database doesn't even show up on the list since it was detached.
thanks in advance.
What is the main difference between snapshot and transactional and merge replication?
View 5 Replies View RelatedHow do I get the below scenario:
EmpID DepID
12 2
17 3
17 2
13 3
Every Employee should be in Department 2 and 3 (as example EmpID = 17 has DepID 2 and 3 from above table). But when any of the employees either exists only in any one department (as EmpID = 12 has only DepID = 2), then a new row should be added to the table for that employee with that missing DepID.
Desired Output:
EmpID DepID
12 2
17 3
17 2
13 3
12 3
13 2
I have a transaction number in my mapping table. I have a matching transaction number in my PDHist table. Sometimes I have matching transaction numbers in my PD table, but not always. This is causing no records to be returned. I have a One to Many relationship between my mapping table and both PD and PDHist.
Also, I need to check for nulls in my foreign exchange table.I can’t post the SQL because this is a classified project. However, it should be something like this, I think.
IIf(IsNull([Redem]![FX Rate]),([PDHist]![Remaining Balance]+[PD]![Closing Balance(TC)]).
The addition isn’t working. I think with a small push I can get this straightened out.Â
When I run this query:
SELECT orderno, *
FROM _order
WHERE order_date >= '5/14/2015 00:00:00'
AND order_date < '5/15/2015 11:59:59'
ORDER BY order_date asc
I get a result of:
A1G7222015-05-14 13:00:11.143
A1G7232015-05-14 13:33:35.407
A1G7242015-05-14 13:39:16.657
A1G7252015-05-14 14:25:43.507
A1G7262015-05-14 14:29:18.050
A1G7272015-05-14 15:38:12.263
But I know there is one more record that falls into 05/15/2015
A1G7282015-05-15 12:26:52.807
Can you see what I am missing in my query in order for me to retrieve the missing record A1G728?
We had some SAN issues and we dont have Transaction Log files for some databases.. The drive which was holding this Tlog files were missing.. How to bring back databases.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello:
I am implimenting the creation of sequence numbers .I use an insert proc on a table that generates the numbers using an identity field:
procedure usp_createidentity
begin transaction
insert into [tblOrderNumber] with default values
rollback ' done so no records in this table
select @OrderNumber = scope_identity()
I call this from another proc that inserts values into my order table:
procedure usp_Insert @OrderNumber int
as
SET XACT_ABORT ON;
BEGIN TRY
BEGIN TRANSACTION
EXEC usp_GetNewOrderNumber @OrderNumber = @OrderNumber output
INSERT INTO [dbo].[tblOrder] ([OrderNumber]) values (@orderNumber) ' inserts value from other stored proc
COMMIT TRANSACTION
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
if (XACT_STATE() = -1)
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
else
if (XACT_STATE() = 1)
COMMIT TRANSACTION
END CATCH
Here is the problem. When I run usp_Insert I get the following: Error 266 Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates that a COMMIT or ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement is missing. Previous count = 1, current count = 0.
This refers to the usp_GetNewOrderNumber that is called inside the other proc as shown above.
The problem does not happen if I put each statement in usp_Insert in its own try/catch. transaction statements.
Maybe it has something to do with the rollback call in the usp_getneworder.
What do I need to do to get rid of this. problem and still run these within one try/catch trans statement set.
Thanks
We have a large table which is very old and not much ppl take care about, recently there is a performance problem from the report need to query to this table. Eventally we find that this table have primary key missing and there is duplicate data which make "alter table add primary key" don't work
Besides the data size of this table require unacceptable time to execute something like "insert into new_table_with_pk from select distinct * from old table"
Do you have any recommendation of fixing this? As the application run on oracle , sybase and sql server, is that cross database approace will work?
Hi Gurus,
We have a SQL 2000 DB1 ( publisher) which is replicated using transactional replcation onto the secondary server DB2 ( subscriber). we have identity columns on the DB1 and we created those tables with 'not for replication' clause. we skipped the following errors in the replication profile '2601:2627:8102:20598'. on DB2 ( the subscriber ) some records are missing in some tables . ( I verified this with record count differences for some tables in both the servers DB1 & DB2.
How to find out what are all the records missing & the cause.
I have listed the msrepl_errors table on DB1 , distribution databases all I'm seeing there are error code 8102 , unable to update identity column.
Any Idea is appreciated.
- Thanks
Jay
While setting up replication to another server my other replications came with the error could not find sp_MSins_<destinationtabel>
Error number 2812.
Is there anyway I can rebuild this stored proceduire or what is the easiest way to start synchronizing again, I can't drop the destination database because the amount of data to replicate is too much
Regards
I can't believe this. MSDE was a great product and I'm sure that SQL Express is even better. The difference is that I can't migrate any of my company's applications to it because they rely on a Replication architecture (requiring Replication Publication). And SQL Agent, how are you supposed to keep the database in good shape if you can't run Maintenance Plans at scheduled intervals?
I know, there are third party products out there to compensate for the lack of the SQL Agent, but they don't solve the replication problem. Besides, the Agent still exists in other editions - it's not like it has been dropped completely. Why do we have to lose functionality and features? We have already lost the use of a second CPU and memory > 1GB. Why do they need to keep taking stuff out? Why don't they just limit access to the new feature-set?
I would rather lose the new features such as Report Server and Full Text Indexing and get the SQL Agent and Replication Publication back. I can almost understand that with a free product, they don't want to keep piliing new features in just to give them away - even though I'm sure the sale of the larger editions more than covers the R&D investment in their construction. Why can't we chose? Agent or Report Server, Replication or Full Text Indexing? I don't need some of these new features (others might), I just want the features that I used to have. Perhaps SQL 2005 setup can be made to choose 2 out of the 4 features?
Whats more, I can't even say that I'll just stick with MSDE, as it now has a limited support life. Microsoft announced that any SQL Server version prior to 2005 SP1 will NOT be supported on Vista or Longhorn Server (nor does it support anything less than Windows 2000 SP4 or Windows XP SP2 where MSDE does).
OK - let me get this right. We had something that has been taken away in the new version. Perhaps I don't deserve the new version if I don't pay for it - fine - I'll stick to the old one I already have. BUT wait... I can't use that on the new platforms coming out.
Are my entry-level customers going to pay for the Workgroup Edition (add AUD$1200 to my entry level edition application of AUD$1500) to replace the Replication Publisher and provide a Maintenance plan? Is anyone going to pay for the re-architecting and re-construction of my application to work around these new limitations?
I guess that will be me. Is this what happens for being loyal to MS products?
Please - give back the SQL Agent and Replication publication.
Joe
One of the table that is in a merge replication somehow is missing anindex. Strangely, only the table in one of the subscriber of the mergereplication is missing the index; another subscriber and the publisherof the merge replication don't have this problem.How should I add the missing index back to that table? My understandingis that making structural change on a table that is inmerge-replication is different from making change on a table that isnot merge-replicated. For example, when we need to add a column into atable that is being merge-replicated, we must add the column bychanging the attributes in the properties of the published article(table) instead of simply using CREATE INDEX command. I am wonderingwhether there is a similar restriction on adding an index onto a tablethat is merge replicated.I have already added the index back to the table anyway. I am askinghere just in case doing this may get me into a problem later on.Thanks in advance for any info.Jay Chan
View 3 Replies View RelatedAt my subscriber database I found some missing Indexes if I update all the missing Indexes on subscriber DB, does it impact at on publisher side?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi all,
We are using a mix of SQL 2005 and 2000 servers and our "main" database server is running SQL 2005 x64 (SP2 ver. 3042).
Our system has run perfectly for months, then subsequent to an SP2 update we are seeing several instances where the data record counts are different for several tables among all the servers.
We are using Merge Replication, with no filters and published every 2 minutes.
Any ideas?
TIA,
Michael
I am simply inserting records in a table, But if record already present then i dont want add that record and display resultset as -1.If record is not present then i want to add that record and commit transaction. I am doing like below : below is sample, I am considering only two columns.
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[Sproc__Save_Teacher_Details]
-- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here
@FacilitiDetailID int
,@SpecialityType varchar(50)
AS
BEGIN
[code]....
above code is working fine for new recordset but if record exists then it is giving two resultsets -1 and 1, but i want to display only -1.
I have recently started using replication in SQL 2012 SP1. When a stored procedure is altered on the source, the changes are replicated to the subscribers; however, the comment headers are removed at the subscribers. Due to the vast number of stored procedures I have, I do not want to move the comments below the Create Procedure statement. Are there any other ways to have comment header move with the stored procedures?
Here is what I am experiencing
Source SP
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[SPTest]
AS
BEGIN
SELECT GETDATE()
END
Destination SP
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[SPTest]
AS
BEGIN
SELECT GETDATE()
END
We have SQL Server 2000 with merge replication at a Publisher and subscriber.
We have some records getting deleted at Publisher and Subscriber and no conflicts are logged.
We have tried the compensate_for_errors setting and this has had no effect.
This is causing serious data corruption and has now become an URGENT issue. Out tech team are almost out of ideas.
Has anyone experienced this or have any ideas as to what to check next?
Hello,
on the server this version is running:
SQL Server Express with Advanced Services
Datenbankmodul
[Version: 9.2.3042.00 Edition: Express Edition Patchebene: 9.2.3042 Sprache: Deutsch (Deutschland)]
Reporting Services
[Version: 9.2.3042.00 Edition: Express Edition Patchebene: 9.2.3042 Sprache: Deutsch (Deutschland)]
Now I will install the "replication" modul, but when I select the option, install replication the system need the
"sqlrun_sql.msi.
I have select the folder (the install folder where the "sqlrun_sql.msi" is) but I become the message:
like this: the "sqlrun_sql.msi" is not the right.... for you SQLEXPRESS Version......
here I found the same .....error:
http://www.codeprof.com/dev-archive/71/19-95-712279.shtm
what can I do,
thanks for help, marc
I built the following query to add the position of a record based on a certain date of the transaction of a customer:
select
CustomerID
, Product
, purchasedate
[code]....
Hello,
I have problem for insert multiple query for insert in differenr tabels for a single record.
I have mail record for candidate and now i wants to insert candiate labour info, candidate passport detail in diff tabel like candidatLabour and candidatePassport,
i used two store procedure for it and i write code for it.and it works fine,but i think that if one SP executed and one record inserted but then some problem occure and 2nd SP not executed then...........
so plz help me
Thanks
Dear all,
I set up a transaction replication (from server A to server B) for tables and stored procedures. When I update the data at server A, the data at server B will be updated by replication. However, the stored procedure can't update at server B no matter what I changed at server A's stored procedure. How can I update the stored procedure using transaction replication?
The other question is the table schema. As I know, the transaction replication will be created a snapshot to project all needed tables and stored procedures at the first time. If I created a new table, stored procedure or changed the table schema (e.g. add/delete a new column), the transaction replication didn't update the new objects to the server B. What can I do to update the transaction replication except creating a new subscription?
Thanks.
epjames
Good Morning to all,
I am new to SQL Server.Here is my question. I have set up transactional replication with immediately updating subscriber between to servers A & B. A is publisher/Distributor and B is subscriber. In the event A fails the applications will be directed towards B. My problem is suppose A has faliled and my data is now written to B. How can i syncronise data in A and b when A is again online and what should i do ?
thanks in advance.
Minesh.
Hi all,
I am using SQL 2k on two seperate servers on win 2k advance servers without any service packs. My problem is i am using transactional replication between two servers (SML1 and SML2), SML1 is publisher/Distributor and SML2 is subscriber. My db name on both the server is same. when i am inserting data in db on SML1 it replicates immediately on SML2 but vice versa in not happening. Any help in setting up two way replication is highly appreciated. (There is no timestamp column on table which is used as article and there is PK).
thanks in advance.
Minesh.
I keep getting this error message even though I have droped and recreated
the replication several times. Has anybody had the same problem?
error message.
"Another snapshot agent for the publication is running"
Thanks for your time.
My Transaction Replication fail with this error message pls help.
This is the error message The process could not create file 'SQLMS1d$MSSQL7ReplDatauncSQLMS1_AFT_National_EMN _National - Transaction - Changes at Both Sides - EMN to Local Only20000607090006Benefit.sch'.
I it possible to setup transaction replication between two sql servers if both Sqlerveragents runs under different accounts and the servers are in different domains
Thanks in advance
Langel
I am attempting to set up transactional replication between a production server (SQL1) and a “reports” server (SQL2). The production server is the publisher, the “reports” server is the distributor and the first subscriber, other subscribers will be added later. There are multiple databases on the production server; selected tables from each will be replicated to corresponding databases on the other servers. Both are SQL7, no SP (yet).
I have set up the replication on two databases so far. The initial snapshot replication runs fine; the tables and data are duplicated on the reports server.
For one DB the transaction replication fail the other still reports “No replicated transactions are available”, which is probably true.
The failing log reader agent history reports: “The process could not execute ‘sp_replcmds’ on SQL1“ (five time, 10 minutes apart). The session details shows 2 items, “Initializing” and the same error message. The error details show it as an ODBC error timeout.
After the fifth time the log agent history reports “The process could not execute ‘sp_Msadd_repl_commands27hp’ on SQL2 ” The session details show 3 items , “Initializing”, “No replicated transactions are available” and the same error message. The error details show the following (Category, Source, Number, Message): Agent, blank, 2000, “IDistPut Interface has been shut down.”; Agent, SQL1-JCL1, 20007,” No replicated transactions are available.” ( 26 times); Data Source, SQL2, 1007 “Cannot insert duplicate key row in object 'MSrepl_transactions' with unique index 'ucMSrepl_transactions'.Cannot insert duplicate key row in object 'MSrepl_transactions' with unique index 'ucMSrepl_transactions'.”
I can restart the agent, but after two hours the same thing appears. These were set up with EM using the wizzards
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
I had established a transaction log replication ,it's not immediate-updated.
on next 2 days,it's normal.but now,it's not available ,and haven't any warning,error,informatin.
I have very trouble about the 'log reader' is running but i change the data in articles it's no effect.
please tell how i do?