The Left Side Of Like Operator

Mar 10, 2008

 

I have a select statement which accepts 2 variable in the "where" condition.

select username from user where variable1 like variable2. But the problem is in the left side of "like" statement if i use fieldname i get the result , but if i use variable name to represent a fieldname then i dont get the result.

 

Any ideas??

View 6 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Getting Count(*) From Left Side Of Join Using WHERE On Right Side Of Join

Jul 3, 2006

Hi,I have 2 tables: tblStatements and tblLines (one to many) AnytblStatements record can have many associated records in tblLines.The search criteria is against tblLines (ie tblLines.fldDateofService


Quote:

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL/CLR DML Error: Invalid Use Of Side-effecting Or Time-dependent Operator

Apr 18, 2008

I am attempting to use a CLR Function to perform an update operation, since a SQL UDF will not allow this within the function. For the POC, I hard-coded the db connection string and setup the assembly to use EXTERNAL_ACCESS. This worked fine and the update operation was running properly via the CLR Function. However, I now want to make the code run in the current db context without plugging in a connection string. So, I've applied "context connection=true" instead of the explicit db string. When I do this, I am receiving the following error:


A .NET Framework error occurred during execution of user defined routine or aggregate
'MyTestCLRUDF':

System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Invalid use of side-effecting or time-dependent operator in 'UPDATE' within a function.

System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException:

etc.


I don't understand why simply swapping the connection string would cause this issue. I assume this is somehow related to permissions, and I am missing something. I've tried using each of the three permission levels (external, safe, and unsafe), and no luck.

Any help is appreciated! Here's the code:


public static bool MyTestCLRUDF(Guid myID)

{

string connectionString = "context connection=true";

using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString))

{

SqlCommand command = new SqlCommand("MySprocName", connection);

command.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;

SqlParameter parameter = new SqlParameter("@ID", myID);

command.Parameters.Add(parameter);

connection.Open();

command.ExecuteNonQuery();

connection.Close();

}

return true;

}

View 6 Replies View Related

Parameters On The Left Side Of A Where Clause Predicate

Apr 7, 2008



Good afternoon,

I'm trying to use a parameterin a way that RS seems to think is unnatural, and I'm wondering about a work around...

Normally I can use parameters like so:

select *
from foo
where fooValue > @myParameter

What I'd like to do instead is use a constant on the right of the predicate, and a parameter to define the column to measure against, like so:

select *
from foo
where @myParameter > 10

Or

select *
from foo
where @myParameter is not null

Any assist with this is greatly appreciated...

Thanks,
Brian

View 1 Replies View Related

How To View Field List On The Left Side Of Report Layout

Jan 4, 2007

I want to see all the fields list on the left side of report layout, you can drag a field and put it on the report.

Thank you very much.

View 5 Replies View Related

Error Invalid Use Of Side-effecting Or Time-dependent Operator In 'EXECUTE STRING' Within A Function

May 8, 2008



Hi all, mister
I want create a function but I get this error: Error Invalid use of side-effecting or time-dependent operator in 'EXECUTE STRING' within a function

I think in a function, cannot use temp tables, or calling exec or store procedures.

Which is the best solution for my issue ? develop store procedure ??

thanks.

CREATE FUNCTION fnObtenerTablaMaestra ()

RETURNS @T Table ( Descripcion VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL, CIF VARCHAR(8) NULL )

AS

BEGIN

DECLARE @cmd nvarchar(max)

DECLARE @sql nvarchar(max)

DECLARE @nexoUNION NVARCHAR(max)

DECLARE @params nvarchar(max)

DECLARE @NombreTabla VARCHAR(MAX)

DECLARE @Descripcion VARCHAR(MAX)

DECLARE @CIF VARCHAR(MAX)

-- Cannot access temporary tables from within a function.

-- IF EXISTS (SELECT TABLE_NAME FROM tempdb.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME LIKE '#tmpTable%')

-- DROP TABLE #tmpTable

-- CREATE TABLE #tmpTable ( Descripcion VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL, CIF VARCHAR(8) NULL )



SET @nexoUNION = NULL



DECLARE c1 CURSOR for

SELECT [CD_NOMBRE_TABLA], [DS_CAMPO_DESCRIPCION], [DS_CAMPO_CIF] FROM [TABLA_MAESTRA]



OPEN c1

FETCH c1 INTO @NombreTabla, @Descripcion, @CIF

--FETCH NEXT FROM c1 INTO @NombreTabla, @Descripcion, @CIF

WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS >= 0

--WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0

BEGIN

SELECT @sql =

'INSERT INTO #tmpTable

N'''+ @NombreTabla + '''

N'''+ @Descripcion + '''

N'''+ @CIF + ''''



SELECT @sql =

'SELECT ' + @Descripcion + ', '+ @CIF + ' FROM ' + @NombreTabla

IF @nexoUNION IS NULL

BEGIN

SET @nexoUNION = 'UNION'

END

ELSE

SET @sql = @nexoUNION + ' ' + @sql



-- EXECUTE (@sql)

--Exec(@sql)

FETCH c1 INTO @NombreTabla, @Descripcion, @CIF

--FETCH NEXT FROM c1 INTO @NombreTabla, @Descripcion, @CIF



END

CLOSE c1

DEALLOCATE c1

--SET @sql = 'SELECT Descripcion, CIF FROM #tmpTable'

-- Error Invalid use of side-effecting or time-dependent operator in 'EXECUTE STRING' within a function

EXECUTE(@sql)

RETURN

END

GO

View 1 Replies View Related

Reporting Services :: SSRS Group Tree View In Left Side Of Report

Jul 9, 2015

I added the row group to show up as the tree view in the left side of the report. But I need it to display the records in the report detail for just that group value for the records when I clicked the group value from the tree view list.

Currently, it‘s not doing that. It takes me to that page where the group value is listed but it lists all other records too (which I don't want).

View 4 Replies View Related

HTTP Error 403 - SQL Server 2005 And ASP.NET Version 1.1 Apps Side-by-side

Aug 31, 2006

I have a Windows 2003 Server running IIS 6.0 and SQL Server 2005. I have just (Today) deployed the first ASP.NET application (developed in Visual Studio 2003 and, as such, dependent on .NET Framework 1.1) on this server and am getting HTTP Error 403 (You are not authorized to view this page). This ASP.NET application runs fine on another server that is configured with the OS=Windows Server 2003, IIS=6.0 but without SQL Server 2005 and without the .NET Framework version 2.0. I found in the IIS Application configuration (on the troublesome site) that my app (in the Default Web Site folder) was pointing to the version 2.0 aspnet_isapi.dll. All efforts to use aspnet_regiis to "re-align" my app with version 1.1 have been fruitless to eliminate the HTTP Error 403. I granted the NETWORK SERVICE account privledges to the wwwroot folder. At this point, I don't know if I have a Framework error or a privileges problem.

Please help.

Thanks,

Rob

View 1 Replies View Related

Configuring Merge Replication For Side-by-side SQL Server 2000 And 2005

Feb 6, 2007

I am trying to migrate from my current system, where I do merge replication from Windows Mobile devices running SQL Server CE 2.0 to a central database running SQL Server 2000 sp3a. I want eventually to move to a system running SQL Server 2005 CE replicating to a SQL Server 2005 back-end. But the transition will need to be gradual, and I may have to support both systems for a while until I can convert all clients from the old system to the new. I also need to do thorough testing.

So ... I'm trying to set up a test environment giving me the maximum possible flexibility to do my testing. Ideally, I'd like to set up SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 on a side-by-side basis, in a manner that would potentially allow mobile devices running both SQL Server CE 2.0 and SQL Server 2005 CE to sync with either back-end server.

Can someone provide me with guidance as what is possible to set up here? I know that SQL Server 2000 and 2005 can be installed side-by-side on the same server. It also appears that you can set up SQL Server 2000 so that EITHER SQL Server CE 2.0 OR SQL Server 2005 CE can sync with SQL Server 2000 (see www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/sqlmobile/connectivity-tools.mspx), but I don't know if it's possible for BOTH SQL Server CE 2.0 AND SQL Server 2005 CE to sync to the same SQL Server 2000. As for SQL Server 2005 ... it appears to be possible to set up SQL Server 2005 so that BOTH SQL Server CE 2.0 devices AND SQL Server 2005 CE devices can sync to the same SQL Server 2005 (see web page cited above). However, I don't know if it's possible to set up a SQL Server 2005 server installation in this manner while at the same time having a side-by-side SQL Server 2000 installation supporting any level of mobile merge replication.

HELP!!!!

View 7 Replies View Related

How Do I Send The Data From The Server Side To The Client Side Specifically In What Format And What Kind Of Connection Do I Use?

Feb 29, 2008



Hello friends....
my question is as follows:

How do I send the data from the server side to the client side specifically in what format and what kind of connection do I use?


waiting for answers.....

View 5 Replies View Related

Reporting Services :: Range Chart To Display Timeline (start And End Dates) Side By Side?

Mar 24, 2014

I'm using SQL Server 2008 R2 BIDS to accomplish this.

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Side By Side Upgrade Of Transaction Rep Database From 2005

Nov 11, 2014

I will soon be embarking on an upgrade of a transaction replicated database (Push) from 2005 to 2012 SP2.The publisher, distributor and subscriber are 3 separate machines.There databases will be detached, MDF and LDF will be copied across. Once attached, replication will be set up from scratch.

The name of the new servers are NOT the same as the existing ones.Should I completely remove transaction replication user the wizard and unticking the DB from being a database for transactional replication or just stop the log reader agent?How can I make sure the last of the transactions have gone across before I detach?Should I detach the subscriber first or the publication? Does it even matter?

Is there a better way of moving across the databases? I for one would have preferred to backup (.bak) then restore on the other side. I'd love to hear opinions on this as well.

View 0 Replies View Related

T-SQL (SS2K8) :: Creating A Query To Show Data Side By Side

Nov 26, 2014

I am working to create a phone list that will contain Last Name, First Name, and Phone Number sorted by last name. For printing purposes I would like to have three columns of data instead of the standard of one column.

Is it possible to create a query to present data in three columns showing the data side by side?

View 9 Replies View Related

Express 05 Side By Side Installation With SQL Server 2005 Standard

Feb 23, 2008

will this create a separate instance?
Is there anything I need to be aware of?
Thank you.
Greg

View 3 Replies View Related

Side By Side Installations Of SQL2005 Express And Developer Editions

Apr 28, 2007

I have downloaded and installed VS C# Express Orcas beta 1. It appears that Express editons ov VS can only connect to SQL2005 Express and not to a high end edition which I have on my computer. In one of the Orcas forums, it was suggested that I can install SQL2005 Express side by side my high end SQL 2005. To play it safe, I wanted to get a confirmation from this forum before I do that. Is a side-by-side installation ok? thanks.

View 3 Replies View Related

Side By Side Comparasion Between 2005 SQL Server And Express Version

May 19, 2006

Is there anywhere I can compare side by side between 2005 SQL Server and 2005 SQL Server express Edition?



I just found out that the express version does not have the database Copy feature (When you right clink on the database object -> Tasks ) !

I don't know about the evel version since I have not install yet. Any idea ?



View 4 Replies View Related

Running 2005 Express And 2000 Side By Side

Jun 1, 2006

If I download sql server 2005 express edition, will it run side by side with my sql server 2000, or is it a one or the other situation?
smtraber

View 1 Replies View Related

Enforcing Rule: Client Side Or Server Side?

Apr 8, 2004

Hi,

In Analysis Services there is an option to enforce a role either on the client side or the server side.

Can someone kindly guide what's the recommended approach and what's really the difference between the two options.

Thanks.

View 1 Replies View Related

Installing Failover Cluster Instance Side By Side

Jul 23, 2015

would like to know if it's possible to install SQL Server Failover cluster instance with shared storage along with standalone installation with Always on ( always on uses WSFC underneath).

View 1 Replies View Related

Side-by-side Upgrade Ruined Enterprise Manager

Dec 11, 2007

Hi people

Here is my case: I've a server running Windows server 2003 edition and SQL2000.
I've installed SQL2005 using the side-by-side method as described by MSFT docs. I've then copied the mdf & ldf files to new locations and attached the db in SQL 2005 management studio. Every thing fine. Next, I've migrated the DTSs using the DTS migration wizard. After this step I have some bad warnings in windows:

When I restart the server I get the following message: "mmc.exe Microsoft Management Console encountered a problem and needed to close".
Furthermore: I can't start the old SQL enterprise manager.
It shows another error "mmc.exe - Entry point Not Found" and closes it self.

The MSFT support page on this error relates it to Windows XP but my system is running Windows server....

Any one has any idea why this is happening?
Any suggested course of action?

Many thanks
ds9

View 3 Replies View Related

Running SQL Server 2008 And 2005 Side By Side

Jan 21, 2008

Hello!

I was wondering if I can install/run SQL 2008 and 2005 side by side with SQL 2005 being default instance. Any issues with that?

Thanks,
Igor

View 2 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Comparing 2 Years Data Side By Side?

Apr 24, 2015

When I try compare 2 years worth of data side by side. They go in separate grids. I know it is just a usability feature.

i would want see same month data for multiple years side by side.

View 5 Replies View Related

Sql Server Reporting 2002 Side-by-side 2005

Jul 15, 2007

having installed 2005 first and installed 2000 with both types of reports going to one 2005 home. i would like to have separate homes

with reports going their respective homes. Do i have to first unstall

2005 and do a new installation with a different report and server than

2000. I would like to avoid this and just fine tune 2000 with the rsconfig.exe. Help me out please.





View 1 Replies View Related

Running SQL Server 2000 && 2005 Side By Side

Jan 9, 2006

Hai

My system is already installed with SQL server 2000 . Is it possible for me to install SQL server 2005 BETA CTP in the same machine and run both side by side.

Regards
 

View 3 Replies View Related

Report - Tables Inside A List Side By Side

Apr 3, 2008

All,

I was trying to do something like puting two tables side-by-side inside a list, and list itself is grouped by a field.
But for some reason, two tables are not organzied pararally even there is no page break inserted.

Please help. Tks in advance.

Alex

View 1 Replies View Related

Migrating Maintenanace Plans In Side By Side Upgrade

Apr 9, 2008

Hi,

I need to migrate from sql 2000 to 2005 and in place upgrade is not possible. I can move the databases, logins but can some one help me to migrate sqlmaint plans and dts packages to 2005.


Thanks,
Rajakanna

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005 Evaluation And SQL Express Side-by-side?

Dec 14, 2005

I have SQL Express installed on my desktop and want to install SQL Server Evaluation.

View 5 Replies View Related

Running SQL Server 2005 Dev Ed. And Express Ed. Side By Side.

Jul 8, 2006

Hi all,

Is it possible to run SQL Server 2005 Dev Ed. and the Express edition side by side on my development platform?

Thanks,

Andy

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL2005 And SQL2000 Client-Tools Side-by-Side?

Oct 22, 2007

We have some developers who manage SQL2000 servers from their WinXP workstations using Enterprise Manager. We have now rolled out our first SQL Server 2005.

Can we install the SQL2005 Management Studio side-by-side with Enterprise Manager on these WinXP workstations?

If not, what are most people doing in these cases?

Thanks!

Mike Hiland

View 1 Replies View Related

Side By Side Upgrade And Login Passwords

Apr 8, 2008

I've recently done a side by side upgrade of a mssql 2000 to mssql 2005 instance. I'm having problems with 1 login that I've been told had a password that was only 3 characters in length. They don't seem to be able to log in with it. I get an error with a state of 8 meaning it's the password. Is there an issue with migrating the id and password as is into the 2005 instance? None of the other ids are having the problem, they all seem to work and have longer passwords.
Any help is appreciated.

View 1 Replies View Related

Side By Side SQL Server 2000 And 2005

May 4, 2006

I plan to upgrade my server to SQL 2005. It is a rather old machine, but still ok with the recommended hardware requirements.

It runs Windows 2000 (SBS) server, which is also a PDC, DHCP, DNS, Exchange server (I stop here but the list is long), with SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition (one single named instance). Everything localized (Italian).

I upgraded the database in a development machine and it works perfectly.

I installed SQL 2005 Standard Edition (English locale) on the server (default instance, MSSQLSERVER), and I have run in a lot of troubles.

The problem seems to reside in the TCPIP network protocols. If I enable TCPIP in the 2005 Server Configuration Manager, the new instance (MSSQLSERVER) does not start (this prevented me from upgrading to SP1 until I realized the cause, disabled TCPIP protocol and was finally able to update).

If I understand correctly, the problem is that both instances, the old 2000 one and the new one, try to listen to 1433 port. I changed manually the port to 1434 in the Server Configuration Manager. The result is that both SQL servers work, but none is working ok. I have several applications accessing the server. The asp application works. The .NET aspx one doesn't.

A tipical error I get is:

Codice evento: 3005
Messaggio evento: Eccezione non gestita. (Unhandled exception)
Ora evento: 04/05/2006 13.42.26
Ora evento (UTC): 04/05/2006 11.42.26
ID evento: 7c2749235b7d4c578591871217f74046
Sequenza evento: 175
Occorrenza evento: 24
Codice dettagli evento: 0
Informazioni applicazione:

Dominio applicazione: /LM/W3SVC/1/Root/intranet-1-127912101551093750
Livello di attendibilità : Full
Percorso virtuale applicazione: /intranet
Percorso applicazione: F:Inetpubwwwrootintranet
Nome computer: IQ
Informazioni processo:
ID processo: 684
Nome processo: aspnet_wp.exe
Nome account: mycompanyIWAM_IQ
Informazioni eccezione:
Tipo di eccezione: SqlException
Messaggio eccezione: Login failed for user 'mycompanystefania'.
Informazioni richiesta:
URL richiesta: http://intranet/intranet/articoli/venditeProd.aspx?Codice=SOL T1
Percorso richiesta: /intranet/articoli/venditeProd.aspx
Indirizzo host utente: 10.0.0.127
Utente: mycompanystefania
Autenticazione: True
Tipo di autenticazione: NTLM
Nome account thread: mycompanyIWAM_IQ
Informazioni thread:
ID thread: 1
Nome account thread: mycompanyIWAM_IQ
Rappresentazione: True
Analisi dello stack: in System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
in System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
in System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
in System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.CompleteLogin(Boolean enlistOK)
in System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.OpenLoginEnlist(SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance)
in System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(DbConnectionPoolIdentity identity, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Object providerInfo, String newPassword, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean redirectedUserInstance)
in System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningConnection)
in System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreatePooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnectionOptions options)
in System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.CreateObject(DbConnection owningObject)
in System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.UserCreateRequest(DbConnection owningObject)
in System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject)
in System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection)
in System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory)
in System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open()
in intranet.Global.Session_Start(Object sender, EventArgs e)
in System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateModule.RaiseOnStart(EventArgs e)
in System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateModule.CompleteAcquireState()
in System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateModule.BeginAcquireState(Object source, EventArgs e, AsyncCallback cb, Object extraData)
in System.Web.HttpApplication.AsyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
in System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)

I also tried to use named pipes on the 2005, but I was unable to access the SQL 2005 server instance from a network computer running the Management Studio. I need to have the new SQL server working besides the old one, for a short period, to evaluate in the production environment if the legacy hardware is actually ok to support it. Any ideas?

View 4 Replies View Related

Installing Sql Server 2005 Side By Side With 7.0

Oct 12, 2006

I'm rather new at working with SQL Server. I've installed 2005 onto my PC and I have 7.0 already. What I want to know is how do I import my packages from 7.0 into 2005?

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

Limited Functionality On Side-by-Side Install

Aug 29, 2006

We are testing our SQL 2000 db on a test box in which we loaded SQL 2000 first and then installed SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Trial edition side by side. I am trying to execute new functions in SQL 2005 against the Northwind db to test and these functions are not recognized. What am I missing?

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved