Adding New Columns With Check Constraints Using Same Batch

Jul 11, 2006

I'm using a stored procedure to add fields to an existing table.

These fields must have check constraints and I need to use one T-SQL batch.

In Sql2000 Ok. In Sql2005, if table exists, I get error "invalid column xxxxx" in Add Constraint statement before new column creation.

the code is

Declare @Setup bit

Set @Setup = 1

if @Setup = 1 Begin

--Alter Table MyTable Add MyField Numeric(1, 0) Not Null Default 3

Exec mySp_Add_Column 'MyTable', 'MyField', 'Numeric (1, 0) Not Null', '3'

If IsNull(ObjectProperty(Object_Id('xCK_MyTable_MyField'), 'IsConstraint'), 0) = 0

Alter Table MyTable Add Constraint xCK_MyTable_MyField Check (MyField >= 1 And MyField <= 3)

End Else Begin

-- drop column

End

GO

If MyTable does not exist and, naturally, I add it before of check constraints (using another Sp which add tables) ok.

If I add FK to new fields, ok.

Now I have to split batch in two parts as workaround...

Can anyone tell me if this is a bug or a "fix" for previous versions?

Many thanks,

Giulio

View 7 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Data Access :: How To Check All Connection Automatically During Routine Check By Using Batch File

May 20, 2015

I have multiple ODBC connection and how to check all connection automatically during routine check by using batch file.

View 5 Replies View Related

Help W/Disabling FK Constraints For Batch Operations

May 2, 2006

HI all,

I'm trying to have a SProc that will initialize a database for me. This db is in development (I'm primarily writing SSIS packages, atm), and I constantly need to truncate the tables, then re-add a dummy/unknown row (PK/Identity value = 1). Of course, I need triggers not to fire (got that part working), and FK constraints to be bypassed temporarily -- that's the problem.

Here's where I'm at:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[_InitializeDB]
AS

SET NOCOUNT ON

DECLARE @name varchar(255)
DECLARE @sql nvarchar(255)

DECLARE tables CURSOR FOR SELECT [name] FROM [sysobjects] WHERE [type]='U' AND [name]<>'sysdiagrams'

OPEN tables
FETCH NEXT FROM tables INTO @name
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS=0
BEGIN
SET @sql = 'ALTER TABLE ['+ @name + '] NOCHECK CONSTRAINT ALL'
EXEC sp_executeSQL @sql
SET @sql = 'DISABLE TRIGGER ALL ON [' + @name + ']'
EXEC sp_executeSQL @sql
SET @sql = 'TRUNCATE TABLE [' + @name + ']'
EXEC sp_executesql @sql
BEGIN TRY
SET @sql = 'INSERT INTO [' + @name + '] (Active) VALUES (0)'
EXEC sp_executeSQL @sql
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
PRINT @sql + ':'
PRINT ERROR_MESSAGE()
END CATCH
SET @sql = 'ENABLE TRIGGER ALL ON [' + @name + ']'
EXEC sp_executeSQL @sql
SET @sql = 'ALTER TABLE ['+ @name + '] CHECK CONSTRAINT ALL'
EXEC sp_executeSQL @sql
FETCH NEXT FROM tables INTO @name
END

CLOSE tables
DEALLOCATE tables
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Running this Sproc produces (for the first ref'd table):

Msg 4712, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot truncate table 'Person' because it is being referenced by a FOREIGN KEY constraint.

View 4 Replies View Related

Checking For Unique Constraints During A Batch Update

Jan 28, 2004

hello .
i have a grid for a table that gets updated with recordset.updatebatch
for a multi-user application.

the problem is that some of the table fields have to be unique

now imagine the next situation.

user A opens the form
user B opens the form
user A writes '1000' in the unique field
user A saves the recordset with updatebatch

user B writes '1000' in the unique field
user B saves the recordset with updatebatch

now there will be two records with the field '1000' !

how can i avoid this ?
i cannot check for unique during the update event of the grid
because it should check during the time it is saving and not
when it is just entering data without having updated the recordset

thanks !

View 2 Replies View Related

Check Constraints

Dec 1, 2000

How do i create a check constraints on column a so it dose not accept $ character? syntax pls.

Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

Check Constraints?

May 4, 2002

Hi,
I am developing a database for my company in SQL server 2000 and I have some
few problems.
Firstly.

I have a customers table and orders table in my DB:

Customers Orders
--------- ------
CustID (primary key) ----------------< CustID
. ^ ProductID
. | Quantity
. | .
. | .
etc. | etc.
|
relationship
(one to many)

What I want to do is:
1) to be able to delete a Customer and automaticaly SQL server delete all the
orders that this customer done from the Orders table.
2) If for some reason the CustomerID changes, SQL should be able to
automaticaly update the necessary fields with the new values in the Orders
table.
Finally, 3) I want to be able to insert a new customer that has an order
and update both the Customers table and Orders table automaticaly. e.g

CustID Name Address ProductID Quantity etc.
------ ---- ------- --------- -------- ----
10-003 John London 33-25 2 ...

Such a kind of insert should add automaticaly the following entries in the
two tables:

Customers Orders
--------- ------
CustID (10-003) CustID (10-003)
Name (John) ProductID (33-25)
Address(London) Quantity (2)
. .
. .
etc. etc.

A friend of mine told me that this can be done using Foreign Check constraints
in SQL server. But I do not know what to do.

Can anybody help me please?

Thank you very much.

Efthymios Kalyviotis
ekalyviotis@comerclub.gr

View 2 Replies View Related

Check Constraints

May 20, 2002

I have a question regarding the use of check constraints. I see how to set it up to make sure a value entered is one of a list using this syntax:

([eft_vc] = 'No' or [eft_vc] = 'Yes')

However, rather than have to hard code the allowable values, I'd like to have them read off another table. The logic would be as follows:

([eft_vc] in (select * from eft_t))

When I try to put this in, I get a message saying that constraints do not support subqueries. Does anyone know of a way around this?

thank you,
Darell

View 1 Replies View Related

Check Constraints??

Jul 4, 2004

Can someone help me with this check constraint. I'm trying to get it runned on MS SQL Server but it seems the syntax isn't correct

check((Derived_Val=0) or ((select count(*) from Stage_One where Task=U_Id and Quantity is null)=0))

Thanx

j2dizzo

View 4 Replies View Related

Check Constraints

Apr 7, 2005

I am Trying to add a check constraint that if the paymenttotal is 0 the column is allowed to have null and if its greater then 0 it is not allow to have null. Here is what I have so far but i get some syntax errors, See if you can see what im doing wrong and how to get this to be valid. Thanks
heres what I got so far


Code:

ALTER TABLE Invoices WITH CHECK
PaymentDate SMALLDATETIME NULL,
CHECK (PaymentTotal = 0)
PaymentDate SMALLDATETIME NOT NULL,
CHECK (PaymentTotal > 0)



I also had this before i changed it to that and I got syntax erros as well but i dunno which is closer.


Code:

ALTER TABLE Invoices [WITH CHECK]
ADD CHECK (PaymentTotal = 0), PaymentDate SMALLDATETIME NULL,
ADD CHECK (PaymentTotal > 0), PaymentDate SMALLDATETIME NOT NULL

View 1 Replies View Related

Check Constraints

Mar 2, 2006

Can someone give me some good examples of check constraints that I can apply to my fields.

For example can I apply a constraint on a name field, at the moment I use one for the date but would like to know many more.

So if anyone has any useful check constraints handy then please tell.

Thanks
Liz

View 4 Replies View Related

Check Constraints

Apr 11, 2007

Hi
I have a field as Releving date in which i enter employee releving date

If i enter date as 11/04/2007.
From that date employee status in master table should be inactive
So that their is no chance for employee to login

for this i don't want to call any procedure or any db object

how can i do this in back end

should i write check constraint(iam not sure of it)

Give solution to this query

Malathi Rao

View 2 Replies View Related

Check Constraints

Apr 30, 2007

What is the best way to establish constraints between two columns in a table

For example (ID1, Date is the primary Key, ID2 can be null sometimes)

ID1EffDateExpDateID2ID2_Location

11/1/200712/31/9999122ABC
21/1/200703/31/2007124XYZ
24/1/200712/31/9999124XYZ1
31/1/200712/31/9999<Null><Null>

I would like to establish a constraint that extablishes one to one relation between ID1 and ID2. Meaning in the above example ID2 =122 should not be assingned to any ID1 other than 1.
(For example, I should not be able to insert another row like
ID1EffDateExpDateID2ID2_Location
41/1/200712/31/9999122ABC)


Beacause this table is maintained in a manual way, sometimes the ID2 which has already been assigned an ID1 is being assigned to another ID1.

What kind of constraint or rule will avoid this scenerio.


Thanks
Raj

View 1 Replies View Related

Check Constraints

Nov 28, 2007

Hello all, here is my problem.

I have an Account table as well as a Bank table. The bank table has a total assets field. There is a foreign key in Account referencing Bank.

What I need is a check constraint that verifies that the total sum of the account balances for a particular bank is less than that banks total assets.

I've been thinking about this one for a while but it's just confusing me. How do I create the expression in the constraint for this? Currently I am using SQL Server Management Studio Express so I'm creating this constraint with the gui.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

View 4 Replies View Related

Check / Unique Constraints

Apr 18, 2001

Hello, I want to write a unique constraint that applies to more than one column. What I mean is that the uniqueness should be that if column A is 5 and column B is 3 no other row where A and B has those values can exist.

Do I write this as a check constraint ? Or how do I do it ?

Also, is there anyone who knows some good reading on how to use Link Tables (many to many relations) in MS SQL Server ?

View 1 Replies View Related

Check Constraints, Triggers

Oct 27, 2000

I have a question concerning setting up data integrity checks in SQL Server.

I have a table that lists "Groups" to which an Entity belongs. The Entity can belong to multiple Groups. Every entity has 1 and only 1 of its Groups designated as the "Primary Group". Based on this, my table contains multiple records for each Entity. Each record describes 1 Group of which the Entity is a member. In this record, there is a bit field indicating whether the Group is the "Primary Group".

In other DBMS's I have implemented a check constraint on the "Primary Group" column to enforce the business rule that "a Entity may have one and only one Primary Group". I am aware now, that in SQL Server 7, I must implement this rule as a trigger, or in the client or data services layers.

Does anyone know if SQL Server 2000 will allow me to write such a check constraint?

View 1 Replies View Related

Check Constraints Or Triggers

Aug 26, 2005

Hi, I´m facing teh following situation:This are just sample table names, but should do for discussingpurpouses.Create table Invoice(InvoiceID Integer Not Null,CustomerType Integer Not Null,CustomerCode Integer Not Null,Amount DECIMAL(10,2) Not Null,.................)Create Table Type1Customer(CustomerCode Integer Not Null,...............................)Create Table Type2Customer(CustomerCode Integer Not Null,...............................)I need to add a way to restrict the CustomerType and CustomerCode,in the Invoice table to the correct values.This means that if customerType equals 1 the customerCode should bechecked against Type1Customer and if customerType equals 2 thecustomerCode should be checked against Type2Customer.I succesfully created a check constraint. That ensures that the validvalues exists when the rows in the Invoice table are inserted orupdated, but doesn´t prevent from deleting records from tablesType1Customer and Type2Customer that are referenced from the Invoicetable.Are triggers the only way to go?Thanks in advanceSebastián streiger

View 3 Replies View Related

Problem With Check Constraints

Jul 20, 2005

I am working with an evaluation copy of SQL Server 2000 for the firsttime; my DB experience lies with MS Access.I have a simple table in SQL Server (tblCompany) that has a fieldcalled "Ticker." When new company stock tickers (i.e., MSFT forMicrosoft) are entered into the field, I'd like them in allcaps--whether the user types msft, Msft, MsFt, etc. In Access, thiswas easy--simply set the Format to ">" in table design view.In SQL Server Design Table view, I've clicked on "Manage Constraints"and put the following code in that I found elsewhere:([Ticker] = upper([Ticker]))I then checked all three boxes below: "Check existing data oncreation," "Enforce constraint for replication," and "Enforceconstraint for INSERTs and UPDATEs." The first one, "Check existingdata..." is checked as I've already entered in some data in the fieldin lowercase to see if the check constraint would go back and changeit to Upper Case--this because I'm wanting to ultimately migrate atable from Access to SQL Server and ensure that all Tickers are inUpper Case.I'm able to do this and then save the table design with changes; butevery time, I then go and look at the table data to see if the checkconstraint was applied, and each time it is not; then, I go back to"Manage Constraints" and find that the "Check existing data..." box isunchecked. I've gone through this SEVERAL times.Hoping this is something simple. Apologize for my "newbieness." I'vegot a "For Dummies" book in front of me as well as numerous Internetwindows open, trying to figure this out. Have checked books online onthe MSFT site as well to no avail.Thanks in advance--RAD

View 3 Replies View Related

Replication Of Check Constraints

Jan 5, 2007

I have tables that are replicated using transactional and merge replication. As a result I am unable to use automatic identity management as transactional replication doesn€™t seem to understand it.

Therefore I have implemented a version of the automatic mechanisms that seems to work in a hybrid environment. It is based on a central table that holds the maximum identity for each table that has been issued to date. Valid identity ranges are issued to each publisher and subscriber as needed in a similar way to the automatic mechanisms and tables are reseeded as needed.

I want to enforce the ranges in a similar way to the automatic mechanism using a check constraint similar to this:

alter table [dbo].[test1] with NOCHECK add CONSTRAINT repl_identity_range_48DF13ED_D503_4F5C_AED9_4E504D03E752 check NOT FOR REPLICATION (([id] > 10001 and [id] <= 20001) or ([id] > 50001 and [id] <= 70001))

This works OK on a client subscriber, but if the change is made on the publisher, then the alter statement itself is replicated out to all clients €“ which is not what is wanted. I have traced the automatic mechanisms using profiler and they issue an alter statement as above €“ following dropping of the constraint €“ but the check constraint isn€™t replicated. I can't see how this is achieved.

How do I stop the check constraint being replicated?

The article property schema option can be set to stop replicating check constraints, but this seems to have no effect. If the publication property replicate_ddl is set to 0 then I do see the behaviour that I want. However, I do need to be able to replicate most schema changes due to upgrades etc €“ so this doesn€™t look like a viable option €“ except possibly for the transactional publication.

Any help would be much appreciated

Thanks

aero1

View 4 Replies View Related

Check Constraints Changed In 6.5->7 Conversion

Sep 8, 2000

When our DB was converted from 6.5 to 7, the some column check constraints changed
to table constraints.

Is there a way to change them back, short of rebuilding the table? I can't find a syntax
to add a column constraint without adding a column. Some of the affected tables contain
millions of rows, so I'd rather not rebuild them.

When I create a test table with a column and a table check, I see that in sysconstraints
"colid" and "status" are different, and in sysobjects "info" and "status" are different. I
am leary of tweaking the database catalog though. Heck, this is SQL 7; I don't even
know if these are real tables or mirages.

create table zzzfoo (
myname char(30) check (myname in ('foo', 'bar')),
myfuzz char(30),
check (myfuzz in ('cotton', 'wool', 'linen'))
)

select sc.* from sysconstraints sc, sysobjects so
where sc.id = (select id from sysobjects where name = 'zzzfoo')
and sc.constid = so.id and so.type = 'C'

constid id colid spare1 status actions error
----------- ----------- ------ ------ ----------- ----------- -----------
1380915991 1364915934 1 0 133140 4096 0
1396916048 1364915934 0 0 133156 4096 0

select * from sysobjects
where id in (select constid from sysconstraints
where id = (select id from sysobjects where name = 'zzzfoo'))

name id xtype uid info status base_schema_ver replinfo parent_obj crdate ftcatid schema_ver stats_schema_ver type userstat sysstat indexdel refdate version deltrig instrig updtrig seltrig category cache
-------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----- ------ ------ ----------- --------------- ----------- ----------- --------------------------- ------- ----------- ---------------- ---- -------- ------- -------- --------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------
CK__zzzfoo__myname__524F1B17 1380915991 C 1 1 6 0 0 1364915934 Sep 8 2000 4:29PM 0 0 0 C 0 10 0 Sep 8 2000 4:29PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CK__zzzfoo__53433F50 1396916048 C 1 0 4 0 0 1364915934 Sep 8 2000 4:29PM 0 0 0 C 0 10 0 Sep 8 2000 4:29PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TIA

View 2 Replies View Related

Altering Functions And CHECK Constraints

Jul 23, 2005

Let's say I create a multi-statement function like this:CREATE FUNCTION dbo.Test ()RETURNS @res TABLE (N int NOT NULL CHECK (N >= 0))ASBEGININSERT INTO @resSELECT 1RETURNENDThat works fine. Then I make a change in the function's body, replace theCREATE FUNCTION with ALTER FUNCTION, and execute the batch. I get an error:Server: Msg 3729, Level 16, State 3, Procedure Test, Line 9Cannot ALTER 'dbo.Test' because it is being referenced by object'CK__Test__N__5D2E32EB'.Indeed, if I look at the list of dependencies for the function in QA'sobject tree, I can see the check constraint referenced in the errormessage.ALTER FUNCTION works fine if I don't specify the CHECK constraint in thedefinition of the @res table.So it seems that the only way to modify such a function is to drop andrecreate. Is that a known behavior? Is there any particular reason for it?Thanks.--(remove a 9 to reply by email)

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Check If DB Constraints Are Enabled In A Database?

Mar 6, 2006

How to check if DB Constraints are enabled in a database?

View 6 Replies View Related

DB Design :: Unique And Check Constraints

Sep 3, 2015

I have one table like below Test table. My requirement is to create constraints to confirm <g class="gr_ gr_331 gr-alert gr_gramm Grammar only-ins replaceWithoutSep" data-gr-id="331" id="331">uniqueness</g> of STID value 101 with LN.

like 

ID - LN - STID
1 - 'ABC' - 101  ---- Valid Row
2 - 'ABC' - 202 --- Valid Row
3 - 'ABC' - 202 --Valid Row (as I want only unique when LN = 'ABC' with STID = 101)
4 - 'ABC' - 101 -- Invalid Row (As I want uniqueness base on LN and STID = 1011)

create table dbo.Test
(
ID int identity,
LN varchar(50),
STID bigint
)

Is this possible with constraints as I don't want to use <g class="gr_ gr_1041 gr-alert gr_gramm Grammar only-ins doubleReplace replaceWithoutSep" data-gr-id="1041" id="1041">trigger</g>.

View 4 Replies View Related

How Does Adding Constraints Affect Performance?

Jul 23, 2005

I'm considering adding domain integrity checks to some of my database tableitems. How does adding such constraints affect SQL Server performance? Forexample, I have a simple constraint that restricts a couple of columns tohaving values within the values assigned in my application by anenumeration:(([Condition] >= 0 and [Condition] <=3) and ([Type] >= 0 and [Type] <=2))This enforces domain integrity for two enumerations having values 0, 1, 2, 3and 0, 1, 2 in the application. Is this an efficient way of performing suchchecks? What are the pitfalls of domain integrity checking?ThanksRobin

View 1 Replies View Related

Query Performance On Paritioned Views With Check Constraints

Mar 21, 2007

Hi,

I have come across this problem with SQL server both on 2000 and 2005. I am stating an example here.

I have two partitioned tables and a view on top of both tables as below:
create table [dbo].[Table_1]
(
[TableID] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
CHECK NOT FOR REPLICATION ([TableID] BETWEEN 1 AND 999),
[AnyOtherColumn] int NOT NULL ,
) ON [Primary]
GO

create table [dbo].[Table_2]
(
[TableID] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
CHECK NOT FOR REPLICATION ([TableID] BETWEEN 1000 AND 1999),
[AnyOtherColumn] int NOT NULL ,
) ON [Primary]
GO
create view TableView
as
select * from Table_1
union all
select * from Table_2
GO

Note the NOT FOR REPLICATION clause on the check constraint on the TableID column.

I then ran the query execution plan for the following query on both SQL server 2000 and 2005.
select * from TableView where TableID = 10

On both the versions the execution plan shows and Index seek on both the tables in the view. This means that my partitioning is not working. If I remove the primary key constraint from the TableID column, the same query on the view shows a table scan on all the underlying tables. This is even worse.

Next, create the same tables and views again, now without the NOT FOR REPLICATION clause on the check constraint as show below:
create table [dbo].[Table_1]
(
[TableID] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
CHECK ([TableID] BETWEEN 1 AND 999),
[AnyOtherColumn] int NOT NULL ,
) ON [Primary]
GO

create table [dbo].[Table_2]
(
[TableID] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
CHECK ([TableID] BETWEEN 1000 AND 1999),
[AnyOtherColumn] int NOT NULL ,
) ON [Primary]
GO

create view TableView
as
select * from Table_1
union all
select * from Table_2
GO



Now run the query execution plan for the same query again.




select * from TableView where TableID = 10

This time you would see that it does an index scan only on the first parititon table. This time it proves that the partitioning works.

I would like to know why does the NOT FOR REPLICATION clause in the check constraint make such a huge difference?

Is it a bug in SQL server?

Or am I missing any thing?

Any help appreciated.

Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

Data Access :: Adding Back Constraints To Table

Nov 11, 2015

I have removed all constraints of a table.I have a copy of the database as back up, now how can i add back the constraints to the removed table.

View 6 Replies View Related

Advice Sought On Adding Sequential Id To Batch

Sep 13, 2007



My batches need to have some sequential ids added to them. These ids need to be system-wide.


Here is example input data. I am given the first two cols and need to generate the third:



Code Snippet
Row RowType ID
A LN LN1001
B LN LN1002
C TR TR2001
D LN LN1003
E TR TR2002
F TR TR2003




There is no relation between Row and ID except for the sequence of the records.

I have a table that looks like this:



Code Snippet
RowType MaxID
LN 1003
TR 2003


and that is where I go to get/update my latest id. (SELECT ? = MaxID = MaxID + 1 Where RowType = 'TR')

My question is this:
I will probably use a script step to do the work of obtaining and applying a new row id to each row. How do I run the requisite SQL from within a script step? Or is there a better way of doing it?



View 3 Replies View Related

Reporting Services :: Adding All Columns To Table Without Adding One By One

Sep 3, 2015

Is there any way or option to get the all columns of dataset added to table when we add a table in data region. It will take lot of time to add one by one and also there are chances to add one column ore than once.

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Check Constraints Have A Definition That Is Longer Than 4000 Characters

Oct 14, 2015

I'm putting a process together to run a DBCC CHECKCONSTRAINTS process against copies of client databases.The author application doesn't set the constraints as trusted, and therefore we need to check the integrity of the data.

The problem is that some of the Check constraints have a definition that is longer than 4,000 characters.When this is the case, DBCC CHECK CONSTRAINTS fails.One option is that I write a cursor to select the constraints that have a definition less than 4,000 characters and then call the DBCC command for those particular constraints. However, I'd prefer a more elegant approach - ideally a way to run DBCC CHECKCONSTRAINTS against all constraints regardless of the length of the definition

View 0 Replies View Related

How Can I Check Variables Comes From Data Flow In Predence Constraints And Conditional Transformation?

May 1, 2008



Hi,

I have Variable , data source and conditional transformation which checks the count(*) if the count == 0 then I connect an script component and change variable to false(initial it is True) and write into a log file...

Then I check that variable on predence constarint at workflow if variable==True then success. BUT
Whenever I run the package my dataflow gets green even the condition does not meet like count==0 . So
my variable's value is "False". Actually if the condition doesnt meet then my script shouldnt work.
Am I missing something???

View 7 Replies View Related

Dropping Columns With Default Constraints

Oct 13, 2004

Hi, I want to drop a column from a table with default constraint. It is giving me error..
------------------
Server: Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The object 'DF__ACTIVITY___ROLLU__108B795B' is dependent on column 'ROLLUP_BGT_COST_FIXED'.
Server: Msg 4922, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN ROLLUP_BGT_COST_FIXED failed because one or more objects access this column.
-------------------------

Here is the drop statement
-----------
DROP STATISTICS ACTIVITY_BASELINE.ROLLUP_BGT_COST_FIXED
ALTER TABLE ACTIVITY_BASELINE DROP COLUMN ROLLUP_BGT_COST_FIXED;
------------------------

How can I first drop the constraint?

View 10 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: How To Find Columns That Have Default Constraints

Oct 22, 2015

CREATE TABLE XYZ
(
ID int DEFAULT 5000,
NAME VARCHAR(100)
)

I have many tables that have many columns with default values

Is there a way to get a listing of

TAB_NAME, COL_NAME, Data_type, Default_Value

View 2 Replies View Related

How To Check That Column Does Not Exists Before Adding It?

Jun 22, 2007

How to check to make sure a column does not exist before adding it? Be nice to do this in t-sql code instead of using ado.net. It seems as if the IF NOT EXISTS is not supported in SqlCe 3.1? I am trying to do this but I get the token error:

IF NOT EXISTS (
select *
from Information_SCHEMA.columns
where Table_name='authors' and column_name='NewColumn'
)
select 'no'


Is there a list of all CE supported t-sql commands?

Thanks,

Dan

View 5 Replies View Related

Adding Columns To A Matrix Report That Don't Belong To The Matrix Columns Groups

Jan 2, 2007

Can we do this?



Adding more columns in a matrix report that don€™t
belong to the columns drilldown dimensions€¦



That is, for example, having the following report:

Product Family


Product

Country City Number of units sold





Then I
would add some ratios, that is, Units Sold/Months (sold per month) and other that
is the average for Product Family (Units Sold/Number of Product Family), for putting an example€¦ some
columns should be precalculated prior to the report so do not get into it, the
real problem I don€™t see how to solve is adding one or two columns for showing
these calculated column that doesn€™t depend on the column groups but they do
for the rows groups€¦




Any guidance
on that?


The only
way I am seeing by now is to set it as two different reports, and that is not
what my client wants€¦






Many
thanks,
Jose

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved