I have a varchar field which holds IDs like (1, 3, 5, 19, 23) when I order it, i get it ordered in ASCII order like (1, 19, 23, 3, 5) rather than (1, 3, 5, 19, 23) Even if I convert it to int, I won't be able to order it.
is there any way I can order a varchar field numerically?
What are some good strategic approaches to using freeform text fields fordata that needs to be queried? We have a product whose tables we can'tchange, and I need to count on a "description" field for storing a value.Two, actually. I'm thinking of adopting this convention:InvoiceNumber@VendorAcronymThere'd be a lot of vendors.Additional issue: sometimes these values would be referred to in thedescription field, and I'd need to distinguish them as referrals ratherthan as original recorded instances of the values. For that, I imaginedeither:InvoiceNumber@@VendorAcronymorInvoiceNumber&VendorAcronymInvoiceNumber//VendorAcronymetc. -- something like that.I'm just wondering if there's best practice for doing anything this stupid(hey, I'm stuck with this as our only option just now; hopefully it's onlytemporary). How to parse out whatever I end up implementing -- well, itneeds to be tractable.Thoughts?--Scott
I am setting up a database that will receive a lot of data from twoseparate telephone centers, the log table will in a short time haveover 1 million lines, and I was wondering if I should use 1 identifyfield or two:case 1:[Id] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL[ServerId] [int] NOT NULLcase 2:[Id] [varchar(20)] IDENTITY NOT NULLWhere in case 1 I would just use a combination of Id and ServerId toidentify the line, where in case 2 I would have the Id field a varcharthat would look something like A-000001, A-000002 for server 1 andB-000001, B-000002 for server 2Which solution will be faster when searching for a record when thewill have over 1 million lines?
Hi, I'm starting a new application in java using JTDS jdbc driver(http://jtds.sourceforge.net) and SQLServer 2005 Express.I have to design the database from scratch and my doubt is if I have to usevarchar or nvarchar fields to store string data.Any experience about performance issues using nvarchar instead of varchar(considering that Java internally works in unicode too)?Thanks in advance,Davide.
how do you get it to sort correctly for the date? at the minute its sorting on the characters rather than actual date value
Code Snippet INSERT INTO @TempItems (OrderID) SELECT OrderID FROM Orders o INNER JOIN Customers c ON c.CustomerID = o.CustomerID INNER JOIN Employees e ON e.EmployeeID = o.EmployeeID ORDER BY CASE @SortOrder --Order ASC WHEN 0 THEN cast(OrderID as varchar(100)) WHEN 1 THEN cast(c.CompanyName as varchar(100)) WHEN 2 THEN cast(e.FirstName as varchar(100)) WHEN 3 THEN cast(o.OrderDate as varchar(100)) WHEN 4 THEN cast(o.RequiredDate as varchar(100)) WHEN 5 THEN cast(o.ShippedDate as varchar(100)) ELSE '1' END,
I've two tables that I've made from some query subsets. Each table has a varchar field with notes/memos and I want to concatenate the fields into one long field.
The problem I'm running into is that when I run the query to check the concatenation, the field is truncated maybe 256 chars in.
I tried converting and casting the field as nvarchar 4000, and I've also done the same for the fields in the two tables, but that doesn't seem to help.
I can query for the fields from each table and none of them are truncated by themselves. It only happens after I concatenate them.
I've created a new table and inserted the results into it, but the field in it is also truncated.
1. Copy old data from each table in LiveDB to same table in ArchiveDB. 2. Delete the data from each table in LiveDB which is in ArchiveDB
Both DBs SIMPLE recovery mode.
Each table has a clustered PK on a single int value. In both DBs
The tables with varchar(max) columns are taking a v.long time to copy over.
IS there anything I can change in the ArchiveDB to make it run faster.
It is the insert that is taking the time. I've tried dropping the clustered PKs in ArchiveDB tables and then rebuilding afterwards but it has not made any difference. After all I am adding data to the ArchiveDB in clustered index order, so wouldn't have expected it to.
How I can change the Archive DB but cannot touch the schema/settings of Live DB.
I'm using SSIS to import data from a table (SQL) containing varchar fields. The problem is, that those varchar fields are changing over time (sometimes shrinking and sometimes expanding). I.e. from varchar(16) to varchar(20).
When I create my SSIS package, the package seem to store information about the length of each source-field. At runtime, if the field-length is larger then what the package expects an error is thown.
Is there anyway around this problem?
Oh, yeah... My destination fields are a lot wider then the source fields, so the problem is not that the varchar values doesn't fit in my destination table, but that the package expects the source to be smaller...
I have 2 varchar fields on MS 2005 table First field is date and format is 080118(YYMMDD) and second is salary field like 00002000(positive) and 00002000- (negative) how can I move them to date and numeric fields on another table....
Hi, I'm trying to improve performance for a db that stores messages. The message is currently stored in an ntext field, but when I look at all the records from the past 3 months, I found that 88% are less than 1000 characters, and 97% are less than 3000 characters. I don't want to actually limit the message size, but it seems like I might get much better performance using a varchar(3000) field to hold most of the messages, and a separate text field just used for those 3% that really are long. Is this a good idea? If so, is it better to put the Message and LongMessage fields in the same table; or, have a separate table to hold the long messages? If it is in a separate table, it would need to be left joined with the message table each time messages are retrieved.Also -- I am getting about 700 new messages daily, and right now have over 150,000 messages stored. The vast majority of activity involves new messages. Is this a good situation to look at using horizontal partitioning?Thanks for any help, I don't really have anyone to discuss this with and it is really helpful to get some other views!!
Hi guys I need immediate help with a query that I am trying to write. I want to sum the values in a query but the field has a type of varchar and it has decimal numbers too. So if I do the query something like that, that converts the field to int, I get the error message. I tried converting it into real or float but I get error message on that too. I need help with adding the calculatedValues and getting there sum. I would appreciate any help with that.
Thanks -Sarah Select SUM(Convert(int, calculatedValue)) from monitor.dbo.monHistory where LocalTimeWithoutDst > '8/26/06' and LocalTimeWithoutDst < '8/28/06'
This is the error message I recieve: Conversion failed when converting the varchar value '274.2' to data type int.
I am querying a tableA with 1.8 million rows, it has id as its primary key and is a clustered index. I need to select all rows where I order by lastname. Its taking me 45 seconds. Is there anything i can do to optimize the query.Will creating a fulltext index on lastname If so, can you give me an example on how to create a full text index on lastname?
[Project1].[Id] AS [Id], [Project1].[DirectoryId] AS [DirectoryId], [Project1].[SPI] AS [SPI], [Project1].[FirstName] AS [FirstName], [Project1].[LastName] AS [LastName], [Project1].[NPI] AS [NPI], [Project1].[AddressLine1] AS [AddressLine1], [Project1].[AddressLine2] AS [AddressLine2],
Hi, i'm new to SSIS and trying to import some csv files (comma delimited) into SQL Server. A NULL value for a CHAR column is correctly regonized as NULl in SQL Server, but a NULL value for of a mapping to a VARCHAR column in SQL Server is not recognized correctly and i get the value "'NULL'" in SQL Server (including the single comma.
Sample:
CSV file contains columns A and B. A and B contains the Text NULL. Column A is mapped to a CHAR field, and column B is mapped to a VARCHAR field in SQL Server. After the import, SQL has the following value: A = NULL as NULL, B 'NULL' as text.
Hi all. I have been going round and round for the past 2 days on this and would appreciate any help. In a view select statement, I need to concat 2 varchar fields with a text field. If I CONVERT the TEXT field to VARCHAR, only the first 30 characters of the field appear in the result set. If I convert the VARCHAR fields to TEXT, I get an error that I cannot CONCAT TEXT fields. I'm not sure what to do. Can someone please offer some assistance? Thanks in advance! Steve
I encounter this particular error. Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: The data types varchar and text are incompatible in the equal to operator. Line 21: Dim reader As SqlDataReader = command.ExecuteReader() This is the first time I'm trying out with MS SQL so I'm abit lost. I hope my code is correct and I've did a little search. I did not set "Text" in my database, I use int and varchar. Here's the affected part of my code and the database. Dim password As String = "" Dim querystring As String = "SELECT Password FROM Member WHERE Username = @username"
'Dim conn as SqlConnection Using conn As New SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("mainconnect").ConnectionString) Dim command As New SqlCommand(querystring, conn) command.Parameters.Add("@username", SqlDbType.Text) command.Parameters("@username").Value = txtLogin.Text conn.Open()
Dim reader As SqlDataReader = command.ExecuteReader() While reader.Read() password = reader("Password").ToString() End While
reader.Close()
End Using
My database: User_ID int(4) Username varchar(50) Password varchar(255) Email varchar(50)
I write using the SQL ODBC driver from software into a SLQ table called UPSSHIPMENT the format is as followed: JobNumber varchar 50 Weight real 4 FreightCost varchar 8 TrackingNumber varchar 50 Shipmethod varchar 50 VOIDID varchar 3
I then have a trigger set to update the PACKAGE table as followed CREATE TRIGGER [UPS] ON dbo.UPSSHIPMENT FOR INSERT
AS
BEGIN UPDATE PACKAGE SET WEIGHT = inserted.WEIGHT, FREIGHTCOST = inserted.FREIGHTCOST, TRACKINGNUMBER = inserted.TRACKINGNUMBER, COMMENTS = inserted.SHIPMETHOD FROM PACKAGE INNER JOIN inserted on PACKAGE.JOBNUMBER = inserted.JOBNUMBER WHERE inserted.VOIDID = 'N'
UPDATE PACKAGE SET WEIGHT = '', FREIGHTCOST = '0.00', TRACKINGNUMBER = '', COMMENTS = 'UPS VOID' FROM PACKAGE INNER JOIN inserted on PACKAGE.JOBNUMBER = inserted.JOBNUMBER WHERE inserted.VOIDID = 'Y'
END
The format of the PACKAGE table is as followed Jobnumber varchar 50 FreightCost money 8 TrackingNumber varchar 50 Comments varchar 2000 Weight real 4
I am getting the following error --------------------------- Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC SQLState: 42000) --------------------------- Error 260: Disallowed implicit conversion from data type varchar to data type money, table 'TESTing.dbo.Package', column 'FreightCost'. Use the CONVERT function to run this query. --------------------------- OK ---------------------------
How do you use the convert function to change the data before the update? Thank You! :mad:
I am parsing a documnet and i am grabbing that document into a variable of datatype varchar. The document contains more than 8k(upto 30k characters) characters. So how can I handle this situation.How can I get that document into my local varchar variable.
declare @found int; set @found = 'select sid from StickyContent where StickyId='+0+' and UserId='+171 exec (@found) delete from StickyContent where sid = @found
I need to pass this statement from my UI i.e in a single query. I am getting this error.
"Conversion failed when converting the varchar value 'select sid from StickyContent where StickyId=' to data type int. "
Current development setup: Visual Studio 2005 (C# language), SQL Server 2005 Express Edition.
I am at this point changing some of my application. It stores a lot of information for times of trains. I decode a file which is text based and my times are stored in varchar(4) columns with the format "HHmm".
I am now at a stage where I need to add values to these times and perform a search based on two time values (a minimum time and maximum time).
I really need to be able to add another varchar(4) value to the times stored in my database (also varchar(4) - may look at this again in future). I have absolutely no interest in storing seconds, modifying the database to include the time colon, nor am I interested in the date portion of a time string, only the 4 digits representing the hours and minutes.
Can this be done easily in SQL server? For example:
varchar(4) of 0445 + varchar(4) of 0027 should result in the time 0512.
Similarly a varchar(4) of 2358 + varchar(4) of 0015 should result in the time 0013.
I have a problem with ordering and I am hoping that someone is able to help.
In my table I have two fields, "requestdate" and "sentdate", and when I display the records I would like to sort by BOTH fields. I want to do this so that the full query is in order by date.
I tried:
ORDER BY requestdate, sentdate DESC
But obviously all that does is order by requestdate (which is NULL or a date) and than it will order by sentdate.
Can somebody tell me how to order by both as if they were the same field?
I am currently working on a PHP based website that needs to be able to drawfrom Oracle, MS SQL Server, MySQL and given time and demand other RDBMS. Itook a lot of time and care creating a flexible and solid wrapper and amdeep into coding. The only problem is a noticed VARCHAR fields being drawnfrom SQL Server 2000 are being truncated to 255 characters.I searched around php.net and found the following :Note to Win32 Users: Due to a limitation in the underlying API used by PHP(MS DbLib C API), the length of VARCHAR fields is limited to 255. If youneed to store more data, use a TEXT field instead.(http://www.php.net/manual/en/functi...ield-length.php)The only problem with this advice is Text fields seem to be limited to 16characters in length, and I am having similar results in terms of truncationwith other character based fields that can store more than 255 characters.I am using PHP 4.3.3 running on IIS using the php_mssql.dll extensions andthe functions referenced here http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.mssql.php.What are my options here? Has anybody worked around this or am I missingsomething obvious?James
can anyone see as to why I would get this error with the following SP? ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[SP] @ID int = 0, @emailFrom VARCHAR(50) = Null, @emailDate VARCHAR(50) = Null, @emailSubj VARCHAR(50) = Null, @emailTxtBody VARCHAR(1000) = Null, @emailHtmlBody VARCHAR(1000) = Null
AS -- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from -- interfering with SELECT statements. SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @Notes VARCHAR (8000) DECLARE @TicketID INT DECLARE @emailBody VARCHAR (1000) DECLARE @Length Int
SET @Notes = '' SET @Length = LEN(@emailSubj)
-- insert a new entry INSERT INTO PopEmail ( emailFrom, emailDate, emailSubj, emailTxtBody, emailHtmlBody ) VALUES ( @emailFrom, @emailDate, @emailSubj, @emailTxtBody, @emailHtmlBody ) -- get the new ID SET @ID = @@identity
If ( @ID <> 0 ) AND ( ISNUMERIC(@emailSubj) = 1 )
Begin IF @emailTxtBody IS NULL BEGIN Set @emailBody = @emailHtmlBody PRINT '@emailHtmlBody: ' + @emailBody END
ELSE
BEGIN SET @emailBody = @emailTxtBody PRINT '@emailTxtBody: ' + @emailBody END
SET @TicketID = CAST( @emailSubj AS int ) SET @Notes = @emailFrom + ', ' + @emailDate + ', ' + @emailBody Select @ID = ID From TicketDetails Where TicketDetails.TicketID = @TicketID
Exec differentSP @ID, @TicketID, @Notes
PRINT 'Subject: [' + @emailSubj + ']' print 'length: ' + CAST(@Length as varchar (10)) Print 'emailSubj: ' + CAST( @emailSubj AS int ) PRINT 'ID: ' + Cast( @ID as varchar ( 10 ) ) PRINT 'TicketID: ' + Cast( @TicketID AS Varchar ( 10 ) ) PRINT 'Notes: ' + @Notes PRINT 'ID: ' + Cast( @ID as varchar ( 10 ) ) END ELSE
BEGIN Print 'ID: ' + CAST(@ID AS VarChar(10)) PRINT 'ISNUMERIC: ' + CAST(ISNUMERIC(@emailSubj) AS VarChar (10)) PRINT 'Subject: [' + @emailSubj + ']' END