SQL 2012 :: Table Partitioning - Switch Out / Merge Range

Mar 6, 2014

If the partitioning MERGE command attempts to drop historic data at the wrong boundary point then data movement between file groups may be necessary before or during the next index rebuild. The script below creates 2 test tables, one using a range right function and the other using range left. The partitioning key is a number between 0 - 59, an empty partition is maintained at the start and end of ranges, 4 partitions contain data in the ranges between 0-14, 15-29, 30-44, 45-59. Data in the lowest range (0 - 14) is switched out and a merge command is run, edit the script to try the different merge boundaries, edit the variables at the start to suit runtime environment 'Data Drive' & 'Log Drive' paths.Variables are redeclared but commented out at the start of code blocks to allow stepping through if desired.

--=================================================================================
-- PartitionLabSetup_20140330.sql - TAKES ABOUT 1 MINUTE TO EXECUTE
-- Creates a test database (workspace)
-- Adds file groups and files
-- Creates partition functions and schema's
-- Creates and populates 2 partitioned tables (PartitionedRight & PartitionedLeft)

[Code] ....

The T-SQL code below illustrates one of the problems caused by MERGE at the wrong boundary point. File Group 3 of the Range Right table is empty according to the data space views, it cannot be dropped though. File Group 2 contains data according to the views but you are allowed to drop it's file.

USE workspace;
DROP TABLE dbo.PartitionedRightOut;

USE master;
ALTER DATABASE workspace
REMOVE FILE PartitionedRight_f3 ;
--Msg 5042, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
--The file 'PartitionedRight_f3 ' cannot be removed because it is not empty.

ALTER DATABASE workspace
REMOVE FILE PartitionedRight_f2 ;

-- Works surprisingly although contains data according to system views.

If the wrong boundary point is used then the system 'Data Space' views show where the data should be (FG2), not where it actually still is (FG3). You can't tell if data movement between file groups is pending and the file group files are not protected from deletion by the OS.

I'm not sure this is worth raising a connect item for but it would be useful knowing where data physically resided after a MERGE RANGE and before an INDEX REBUILD, the data space views reflect the logical rather than the physical location if a data movement is pending.

View 0 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQL 2012 :: Dynamic Partitioning Of Table Server

Dec 3, 2014

I need Dynamic Partition of SQL Table.

1. What is the best practice for partitioning (on date column)

2. The project on which i am working correctly have a case where in i get the update of my status flag after few days (Say 15 - 30) in that case if my data got into partition table how to update and how to search which partition has my data

3. Is creating partition occupies more disk space?

4. Is every partition would need index?

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2012 :: Table Partitioning For 500gb In Size

Feb 25, 2014

Script to do the table partitioning for a 500gb in sliding window technique?

View 9 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Partitioning Large Table On Nullable Date

May 15, 2014

I have a very large table that I need to partition. Ideally the table will write to three filegroups. I have defined the Partition function and scheme as follows.

CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION vm_Visits_PM(datetime)
AS RANGE RIGHT FOR VALUES ('2012-07-01', '2013-06-01')
CREATE PARTITION SCHEME vm_Visits_PS
AS PARTITION vm_Visits_PM TO (vm_Visits_Data_Archive2, vm_Visits_Data_Archive, vm_Visits_Data)

This should create three partitions of the vm_Visits table. I am having a few issues, the first has to do with adding a new clustered index Primary Key to the existing table. The main issue here is that the closed column is nullable (It is a datetime by the way). So running the following makes SQL Server upset:

ALTER TABLE dbo.vm_Visits
ADD CONSTRAINT [PK_vm_Visits] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
VisitID ASC,
Closed
)
ON [vm_Visits_PS](Closed)

I need to define a primary key on the VisitId column, but I need to include the Closed column in order to partition on it.how I would move data between partitions on a monthly basis. Would I simply update the Partition function, or have to to some sort of merge, split, or switch function?

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2012 :: Table Partitioning Based On Date Column

Aug 25, 2014

We have a database and have 6-7 growing tables. All the tables have Primary and foreign key relation. I want to do partition based on the date column.

I need 3 partitions

First partition has to hold present data
second partition need to hold the previous year data (SAS storage)
Third partition need to hold all the old data and need to be in the archive database

I understand that first we need to disable the constraints (Indexes PK & FK)
Then create partition function and partition schema
Then Create the Constraints again

View 9 Replies View Related

Horizontal Partitioning By Date Range

Jan 17, 2001

HI, I'm testing out partitioning for an upcoming project and I'm a little confused over the query plan im generating.

I have a 13 million row table I want to break in to date ranges:
tables are calljrnl,calljrnl_1999 and calljrnl_2000. The calljrnl table contains data for the last six months. one view, calljrnl_view is a union all of these three tables.

alter table calljrnl add constraint dt_constraint check (cj_created_dt >= '2000-10-01 00:00:00')

alter table calljrnl_1999 add constraint dt_constraint_1999 check (cj_created_dt <='1999-12-31 23:59:59')

alter table calljrnl_2000 add constraint dt_constraint_2000 check (cj_created_dt >='2000-01-01 00:00:000')

alter table calljrnl_2000 add constraint dt_constraint_2000_2 check (cj_created_dt <='2000-09-30 23:59:59')


The problem I'm having is that when I query on any date range outside the constraints set on the calljrnl_2000 table, It still wants to scan the calljrnl_2000 table.
I'm assuming this has something to do with how the constraints are structured, but I am not able to find the right combination.

ALL HELP IS GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!!

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Replicating Merge Range And File Drops For Partitioned Table?

Jul 28, 2015

I have few tables, which are replicated and partitioned. They also have archival process. I want to avoid having to run that same process on the subscriber.

Replication of partition switching is easy. However I am not sure how to replicate merge range and empty filegroup/file drops.

There the following article options:

Copy file group associations
Copy table partitioning schemes
Copy index partitioning schemes

I am not sure if these are enough to implement the replication of merge range and empty filegroup/file drops.

I could not find and option to copy partition functions.

View 0 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2012 :: Date Range Checking In Table

Mar 16, 2015

I have a table with EmployeeID, StartDate, and EndDate with a PK of EmployeeID, StartDate. How can I check to see that there's no overlap for StartDate and EndDate for a given employee? That is, on any given day there must only be 1 row for an employee where Getdate() is Between StartDate and EndDate. For an active employee their EndDate is set to 06/06/2079.

I've tried it using Row_Number() with Over() but am returning too many rows indicating overlap when none exists.

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2012 :: Merge Multiple Rows From Single Table

Nov 17, 2014

I have resulting rows from a query similar to the following:

The data is coming from a single table that contains only one coverage code column and one coverage code date, but the end user wants the two coverage code types and dates combined into a single row. So the SELECT looks something like this:

SELECT
[Employee ID] = emp.employee_id,
[Coverage Code 1] = enr.coverage_code,
[Coverage Date 1] = enr.coverage_date,
[Coverage Code 2] = case when enr.product_type = 'Accident.Accident'
then enr.coverage_code else NULL end,

[Code] ....

I basically want to merge the like Employee ID's together into a single row like the following:

I know I have done this before and it is probably pretty simple.

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Partitioning A Large Dimension?

May 9, 2014

The SQL CAT team's recommendation is to avoid partitioning dimension tables: URL.....I have inherited a dimension table that has almost 3 billion rows and is 1TB and been asked to look at partitioning and putting maintenance in place, etc.I'm not a DW expert so was wondering what are the reasons to not partition dimensions?

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Composite Key Partitioning In Tabular Model

Jun 17, 2014

I have a question about partitions in both SQL Server table and Tabular Model. I started to use Tabular Model recently.

I need to partition a table that collects daily rows for different clients.

The natural partition key is a combination of clientID+dateID (something like CL-YYYYMMDD)

I created a configuration table with a primary key PartitionID IDENTITY(1,1) , that contains also the field clientID and dateID

Every day I add a new row in it and I get a partitionID for the new client and date

Then I created a partitioned fact table using PartitionID as the partition field, using the partition function and the partition schema as well.

The daily client data is inserted in the partitioned table using the partitionID

Everything works fine, and the data are loaded correctly into the partitioned fact table.

Then I created a Tabular Model where the fact table is the partitioned table, and I created tabular model partitions using something like "select <field list> from PartitionedTable where partitionID = <partitionID>"

In this way, every day I load partitioned data in both sql server and tabular model. I have two dimensions, client and calendar

Now my question is: when I browse the Tabular Model, and I'm selecting a specific dimension date and dimension client, am I using the partitionID index correctly?

Or should I put in the tabular model partition query something like "select <field list> from PartitionedTable where clientID = <clientID> and dateID = <dateID>"? In this case is still working the partitionID index? How can I check it?

View 0 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2012 :: Using Merge Statement Output Records To Rebuild Table On Specific Date

Mar 5, 2015

I have a table which is updated daily using a MERGE statement. As records are insert, updated and deleted, I am saving the OUTPUT from the MERGE statement into a history table with a timestamp and action$ column appended to the record.

Using this history table, I'd like to rebuild the data based on specific past date. I was able to create a stored procedure that inspects each record in the history table and apply it to the data in a temp table. The stored procedure solution uses multiple queries to rebuild the data at a point in time. I was curious if there was an easier and more efficient solution using a table function.

View 2 Replies View Related

Merge Replication Identity Range Error

Jan 8, 2008

Hi all i have setup merge replication with one publisher and 3 subscribers



The replication worked fine for about 2 months then i recieved the following error on all my subscriptions



The Publisher failed to allocate a new set of identity ranges for the subscription.
This can occur when a Publisher or a republishing Subscriber has run out of identity
ranges to allocate to its own Subscribers or when an identity column data type does
not support an additional identity range allocation. If a republishing Subscriber has
run out of identity ranges, synchronize the republishing Subscriber to obtain more
identity ranges before restarting the synchronization. If a Publisher runs out of identit
(Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error number: MSSQL_REPL-2147199417)
Get help: http://help/MSSQL_REPL-2147199417


I have updated my sql server to service pack 2

The publisher is sql Standard edition and the subscribers are Express edition



Any help would be great

Thanx

View 3 Replies View Related

Can I Set A Default Range For The Identity Values For Merge Replication?

May 8, 2006

Hello,

We have a couple of tables that can have quite a bit of data each day prior to replication. Can we increase the default values for a table for each subscription? For example we have a table called table1 and on the sqlexpress client they could enter in 10000 rows a day, on table2 it's just 100 rows a day. How can we increase the values to where we do not get the error for table1 stating that the insert failed because it conflicted with the identity range check constraint. Thanks in advance.

View 1 Replies View Related

Merge Replication - Setting Identity Range Management.

Feb 2, 2007

Hi All;

I am trying to set up Merge Replication on a database and want to set the IdentityRange Management to Auto for all my tables which use a Identity column.

In the wizard, on Article Properties Page, I can do this by selecting a Table, and going for its properties, but this is a tedious task as I have ~300 tables to set this property on.

Is there another way or a global location where I can set the property to true and even mention the ranges and the threshold, so that I dont have to pick each table and set it individually.

I am also aware of the fact that I can Generate a Script and modify it and run that, but I was looking for some way to do this in the wizard.

Thanks!

View 1 Replies View Related

Finding Valid Identity Range On Merge Subscriber

Nov 22, 2006

I am using merge replication with automatic identity range management

I want to be able to give a disconnected subscriber a warning message if a certain percentage of the allocated subscriber identity range has been used
- so that they can make sure they reconnect soon to obtain a new identity range

I can get the current identity value OK, but I can't find a good way of finding the current permitted primary and secondary ranges

The information is available in the check constraint, but I don't really want to have to parse this!

CONSTRAINT [repl_identity_range_0DF907AC_40CF_4849_9BD0_2173C90A3805] CHECK NOT FOR REPLICATION (([ContactID]>(10000040000.)
AND [ContactID]<=(10000050000.) OR [ContactID]>(10000050000.) AND [ContactID]<=(10000060000.)))

I can't find any system view which will provide this information

Is there a recommended way of doing this?

Thanks

aero1

View 3 Replies View Related

ALTER TABLE SWITCH PARTITION On A Replicated Table

Apr 10, 2007

A customer wants to implement table partitioning on a replicated table.



They want to hold 13 months of data in the table and roll off the earliest/oldest month to an identical archive table. The table has a date field and partitioning by month makes sense all around.



So SWITCH PARTITION is the obvious solution to this, except for the fact that the table is replicated (transactional w/no subscriber updates).



What are his architectural or practical solutions to using table partitioning and replication?











thx

View 5 Replies View Related

Table Switch Won't!

Aug 17, 2007

I am trying my first sliding partition scheme with 2005, and I am getting the following error...


ALTER TABLE SWITCH statement failed. Check constraints or partition function of source table "ScanStoreAggregateLoad' allows values that are not allowed by check constraints or partition function on target table "ScanStoreAggregateTest'.


I have gone over the functions and constraints a gazillion times. The columns are set to Not Null. The constraints are set to AND NOT NULL. The constraint values align and align with the function. But still I get the failure. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Here are the definitions:


CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION pfn_ScanStoreAggregate(int)

AS

RANGE LEFT FOR VALUES

(19224,

19225,

19226,

19227)


CREATE TABLE dbo.ScanStoreAggregateTest(

ProductID int NOT NULL,

DateKey int NOT NULL CONSTRAINT ck_ScanStoreAggregateRange CHECK ((DateKey BETWEEN 19224 AND 19227) AND (DateKey IS NOT NULL)),

Span tinyint NOT NULL,

LocationID smallint NOT NULL,

WeeksTY tinyint NOT NULL,

WeeksLY tinyint NOT NULL,

UnitsTY numeric(12, 2) NOT NULL,

UnitsLY numeric(12, 2) NOT NULL,

SalesTY money NOT NULL,

SalesLY money NOT NULL,

CostTY money NOT NULL,

CostLY money NOT NULL,

ACVTY money NOT NULL,

ACVLY money NOT NULL,

SalesPerMMACVTY money NOT NULL,

SalesPerMMACVLY money NOT NULL,

) ON ps_ScanStoreAggregate (DateKey)


CREATE TABLE dbo.ScanStoreAggregateLoad(

ProductID int NOT NULL

,DateKey int NOT NULL

,Span tinyint NOT NULL

,LocationID smallint NOT NULL

,WeeksTY tinyint NOT NULL

,WeeksLY tinyint NOT NULL

,UnitsTY numeric(12, 2) NOT NULL

,UnitsLY numeric(12, 2) NOT NULL

,SalesTY money NOT NULL

,SalesLY money NOT NULL

,CostTY money NOT NULL

,CostLY money NOT NULL

,ACVTY money NOT NULL

,ACVLY money NOT NULL

,SalesPerMMACVTY money NOT NULL

,SalesPerMMACVLY money NOT NULL

) ON DataAggregates



ALTER TABLE dbo.ScanStoreAggregateLoad

WITH CHECK

ADD CONSTRAINT ck_ScanStoreAggregate19227_DateKey

CHECK ((DateKey = 19227)

AND (DateKey IS NOT NULL))

View 6 Replies View Related

.rdlc Table Use Of SUM And SWITCH Together?

Jan 19, 2007

Hello everyone, thanks in advance for reading. I'm new to reports and have tried searching for my answer with no luck. Any direction would be great.

Here is the issue, I have 3 colums in the dataset which display String data ("High", "Medium", or "Low")

I've added a column to the table on the report where I would like to convert the value of "High", "Medium" and "Low" to 3,2,1 respectively then SUM these numbers.

Is this possible? I've tried several variations of the code below--maybe it's not possible to do what I want? Thanks again for your time and help.



Fields!PP.Value is set to:
=Switch(Fields!Avail_Rank.Value = "High", 3, Fields!Avail_Rank.Value = "Medium", 2, Fields!Avail_Rank.Value = "Low", 1)

=Switch(Fields!Volume.Value = "High", 3, Fields!Volume.Value = "Medium", 2, Fields!Volume.Value = "Low", 1)

=Switch(Fields!Integ_Rank.Value = "High", 3, Fields!Integ_Rank.Value = "Medium", 2, Fields!Integ_Rank.Value = "Low", 1)

=Sum(Fields!Avail_Rank.Value + Fields!Volume.Value + Fields!Integ_Rank)

View 3 Replies View Related

DB Design :: Table Partitioning Using Reference Table Data Column

Oct 7, 2015

I have a requirement of table partitioning. we have 10 years of data on a table which is 30 billion up rows on 2005 server we are upgrading it to 2014. we have to keep 7 years of data. there is no keys on table or date column. since its a huge amount of data and many users its slow down the process speed. we are thinking to do partition on 7 years for Quarterly based. but as i said there is no date column on table we have to use reference table to get date. is there a way i can do the partitioning with out adding date column on table? also does partition will make query faster? 

I have think three ways to do it.
1. leave as it is.
2. 7 years partition on one server
3. 3 years partition on server1 and 4 years partition on server2 (for 4 years is snapshot better?)

View 3 Replies View Related

Weird Results Post Merge Agent Run (Automatic Identity Range Management)

Dec 1, 2005

I have implemented replication between 2 servers (SERVER1 AND SERVER2) and for test purposes i just have 1 table(Table1) in the publisher.

View 1 Replies View Related

Proc To Switch Two Values In Table

May 29, 2008

I need to switch two int values in my table, but I have no clue how to do it.  If I switch the 6 to a 5, then I can't distinguish between the 5 that's supposed to be a 5 and the 5 that needs to be a 6. Any help is greatly appreciated - thanks in advance! 

View 1 Replies View Related

Help With ALTER TABLE SWITCH (IDENTITY COLUMNS)

Feb 13, 2008

I am having problem when performing the alter table switch. Both tables are identical and have pk.

ALTER TABLE SWITCH statement failed. There is no identical index in source table 'LocalDeltanet.dbo.testresults' for the index 'PKIDX_testSummary' in target table 'LocalDeltanet.dbo.testresults_part' .



CONSTRAINT [PKIDX_testSummary] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED

( [testresult_id] ASC )

WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON)

ON TResultsScheme (testresult_id) ) ON TResultsScheme (testresult_id)


I have performed the function on other tables successfully, but this is the first that has an identity column involved. Is there anything special that needs to be done?



[testresult_id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,

View 11 Replies View Related

Partitioning A Table

Mar 27, 2008

i have a table named "user" in which user which are located at different places within a city are recorded.
i want to group user with respect to there location like users of northern region are recorded first then users of western region and so on.
tell me from horizontal and vertical partitioning wh technique is better or i should use some other technique.
thanks  for ur consideration.

View 5 Replies View Related

Table Partitioning

Nov 14, 2000

Hi,
I want to know more on table partitioning.I do not know where to get the right info.from.
I have a doubt - if a table is partitioned horizontally how does a query identifies where to pick up the data from i.e. from which part of partitioned table?

View 2 Replies View Related

Table Partitioning

Jun 16, 2008

i want to partition a table containing about 3 million rows. The partition column will be of datetime type.

following is the partition function i have used
create partition function MyPartFun
(datetime) as range left for values ('07/30/2007','09/30/2007','11/30/2007','01/30/2008','04/30/2008')


following is the partition scheme i have used
create partition scheme PartScheme as
partition MyPartFun all to ([primary])


i know how to add partition column while creating the table
But dont know how to add above partition scheme to an already populated table
Plz help...

View 2 Replies View Related

Table Partitioning

Apr 24, 2007

Hi,
I have a database created using Enterprise Manager Wizard.
For example datafile db1_data.mdf and log file db1_log file exists.
All the tables are created in datafile db1_data.mdf.
Now to improve performance I want to implement table partitioning.
Can anybody tell me howto implement it with existing strutcure.
Suppose there is table Mytable in which all update and delete actions are performed regularly.And it contains about 10,0000 records.
I want to partition the table so that it contains 5000 records.

Solution with example highly appreciated.

Satish

View 7 Replies View Related

Table Partitioning

Dec 13, 2007

Hi Experts,
I am new to Table Partitioning, Can any body guide me how to do table partitioning?
any way here is my scenario, we are having one database called "DATA" in SQL 2000 server and we have migrated to SQL 2005 by using backup and restore. and "DATA" is having about 15 tables and they are very very very big in size. and they dont have any index on a coulum name "DATETIME", but i want make table partition according to that perticular field "DATETIME" and right present we are having 6 months of data.
So, how to proceed further?
Your help will be appreciable..

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Table Partitioning

Mar 19, 2007

 

i am trying to partition an sql table in sql server 2005, i created the partition schema and the data files that i want the data to be filled in after the partition. After the partition is finished sql gave me partition is successful , but i noticed that the size of data files i created has not increased and their sizes are the same.

notice: i have a clustered index on this table, so i dropped this index and recreated it 

 Bellow the script that i am using

 

 

and thank you for your help in advance

View 1 Replies View Related

What Does Mean Table Partitioning ?

Mar 7, 2008

Hello frnds....what does mean by this ?

View 1 Replies View Related

[Table Partitioning] What Is The Best Method?

Oct 11, 2006

Hello,

I have a Sql Server 2005 database with many tables, each with millions of records within them.

They all have a Receive Date field, with records going back 10 years or so.

What would be the best way to partition it? I was thinking of partitioning them by years, but that would give me 10+ partitions -- would that be alot of overhead?

~Le

View 2 Replies View Related

Partitioning A Large Table - How Much Is Too Much?

Nov 14, 2007

Hi folks! I'm looking for advice on partitioning a large table. In the DDL below I've changed names to protect the guilty.

My table has this schema:


CREATE TABLE [dbo].[BigTable]
(
[TimeKey] [int] NOT NULL,
[SegmentID] [int] NOT NULL,
[MyVal] [tinyint] NOT NULL
) ON [BigTablePS1] (TimeKey) -- see below for partition scheme

alter table [dbo].[BigTable] add constraint [PK_BigTable]
primary key (timekey asc, SegmentID asc)

-- will evaluate whether this one is needed, my thinking is yes
-- based on the expected select queries.
create index NCI_SegmentID on BigTable(SegmentID asc)


The TimeKey column is sort of like a unix time. It's the number of minutes since 2001/01/01, but always floored to a 5 minute boundary. so only multiples of 5 are allowed.

Now, this table will be rather big. There are about 20k possible SegmentIDs. For every TimeKey from 2008/01/01 to 2009/01/01 (12 months), I'll have on the order of 20000 rows, one for each SegmentID.

For the 12 month period, there are 365*24*60/5=105120 possible TimeKey values. So the total rowcount is over 2 billion. (20k * 105120)

Select queries are expected to be something like this:


-- fetch just one particular row...
select MyVal from BigTable
where TimeKey=5555 and SegmentID=234234

--fetch for a certain set of SegmentID and a particular time...
select
b.SegmentID
,b.MyVal
from BigTable b
join OtherTable t on t.SegmentID=b.SegmentID
where b.TimeKey=5555
and t.SomeColumn='SomeValue'


Besides selects, also I need to be able to efficiently issue update statements against the table with new values in the MyVal column based on a range of TimeKey values (a contiguous span of a few days) and sets of about 1000 SegmentID. updates would always look like this:


update t
set t.MyVal=p.MyVal
from BigTable t
join #myTempTable p on t.TimeKey=p.TimeKey
and t.SegmentId=p.SegmentId


where #myTempTable would have order of 1000*24*60 rows in it, all with contiguous TimeKey values, and about 1000 different SegmentID values. #myTempTable also has a clustered pk on (timekey asc, SegmentId asc).

After the table is loaded, it would never get any inserts or deletes. only selects and updates.

Given the size, and the nature of the select and update queries, this table seems like a good candidate for partitioning. I'm thinking it makes sense to partition on TimeKey.

So my question is, is it stupid to create a separate partition for each day in the year long span of TimeKeys this table covers? That would mean 365 partitions in the partition function and partition scheme. Something like this:


CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION [BigTableRangePF1] (int)
AS RANGE LEFT FOR VALUES
(
3680640 + 0*1440, -- 3680640 is the number of minutes between 2001/01/01 and 2008/01/01
3680640 + 1*1440,
3680640 + 2*1440,
3680640 + 3*1440,
...snip...
3680640 + 363*1440,
3680640 + 364*1440,
3680640 + 365*1440
);
GO

CREATE PARTITION SCHEME [BigTablePS1]
AS PARTITION [BigTableRangePF1]
TO
(
[PRIMARY],[PRIMARY],[PRIMARY],
...snip...
[PRIMARY],[PRIMARY],[PRIMARY]
);
GO


does anyone have any experience with partitioned tables with so many partitions? Is a few hundred partitions too many? From my understanding of partitions, seems like having so many will be ok. Is it somehow worse than having hundreds of tables in a database?

Even with one partition for each day, I'll still have 24*60*20000/5 ~ 5m rows in each one.

5m seems like a manageable number. 2b does not.



elsasoft.org

View 2 Replies View Related

SQLServer Table Partitioning

Jun 5, 2007

Hi!I have a question:I already have a DB that uses partitions to divide data in USCounties, partitioned by state.Can I use TWO levels of partitioning?I mean... 3077 filegroups and 50 partition functions that addressthem, but can I use another function to group the 50 states?Thanks!Piero

View 15 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved