Will SQL Express SP2 automatically come down in the Windows Update Service or will we have to update our users? I seem to remember seeing something somewhere that it will.
Does anyone have a link to an authority or official notice on this?
I've let my Vista Ultimate 64-bit installation on a Dell Precision M90 pretty much have its way with automatic update which has worked reasonably well...until now.
I've installed the MS CRM 3.0 laptop version into my Outlook client. Everything was working well until automatic update tried to install Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Express Edition Service Pack 2 (KB 921896) which failed. It also rendered the Online/Offline functionality unusable and, with the installation accomplished while I was Offline, all of my CRM data is sequestered. Uninstalling the CRM client and SQL Express with it while I'm in an Offline condition has some real downsides so I thought I'd try to fix the SP2 issue through this group and then work my way back through the product teams.
The Windows Update installer returns a failure code of 2B22.
I've tried the downloadable SP2 upgrade but only the SQLEXP32.EXE seems to be available through any of the links in the SQL Express pages I've yet visited, not the WOW version.
Since today (after installing the latest Windows Updates !on my local machine!) I cannot login to a SQLExpress instance remotely; stating that it cannot find the server/instance.
The weird thing is: it only happens when I want to login to the non-default instance (sqlexpress 2005) (<IP><instance>).
When i'm using the default instance (msde 2000 or sqlexpress 2005 on another machine) (<IP>) it seems to work fine.
Does this have something to do with the windows updates, or is it just a coincedence?
I had IIS (7 beta I believe) working perfectly on Vista Home Premier. My web site is Access database driven with a mix of VBscrip and JScript in asp pages.
After a recent Windows update it is now broken! I am getting ODBC errors although I the code I used was working fine before;
I had installed SQL Server 2005 developer on my machine (Vista 64-bit) prior to installing Visual Studio 2005. When I installed VS, I used the default installation, which installed SQL Server Express. Soon thereafter, I started getting notifications in Windows Update about an update to SP2. However, when I try to install it, it fails with "Code 7367", and provides no other useful information. I tried downloading SQL Server Express SP2 myself but it would not let me update the existing instance on my machine. So I totally removed the instance from my machine through add/remove. However, I restarted and the update is still showing up and won't go away!! Does anybody have any ideas of getting this problem?
Windows updates are scheduled for the server every 15 days. After windows update the machine reboots on its own but sql server does not start. If I reboot the mchine manually sql server starts without any problem. SQL services set to start automatically. Can somone tell me what do I need to do to fix this problem.
Is there anything special that I need to worry about in regards to Windows Updates on SQL Servers? I do not have a good development environment yet so testing them first really isn't feasable. (This is going to change very soon. I'm just waiting on a fiber card so I can connect the Dev server to a RAID.) The SQL Servers are pretty far back in regards to MS updates so I want to make sure I won't do any damage to the DBs or SQL Server itself. The first update that I am going to install is Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2.
I want to actualice my SQL Server and i´m asking if it´s posible to update all the hotfix trough the web update.microsoft.com, there is any automatic way in order to update SQL Server?
I have a windows application that uses a small MySql as its data source. I would like to convert it to SQL Express. I would like to continue to manage the data from the windows application, but would like to make it available to the web using Visual Web Developement. I can create the new database in VWD, but how do I access the data from my application? I can use either ODBC or ADO.
I have a managed code DLL that is used as a CLR assembly in my database. A stored procedure in the database references this CLR assembly. My CLR assembly has a dependency on Microsoft's System.Management.dll. In order to get my assembly to work, I added System.Management.dll as an assembly to the database using:
CREATE ASSEMBLY SystemManagement FROM 'C:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727System.Management.dll' WITH PERMISSION_SET = UNSAFE GO
For months this stored procedure has worked fine... up until today.
Today (7/11/07) I noticed a new Microsoft update was available. I applied the patch to an XP machine that has my database and now my CLR assembly stored procedure no longer works. I checked a 2003 Server machine that did not have the latest patch and see that the stored procedure is working fine. I then apply Microsoft update to the 2003 server machine. Now the stored procedure no longer works on the 2003 machine.
I deleted my stored procedure and CLR assembly and then added them back with no success. I then deleted and added back the System.Management.dll assembly again and suddenly now my stored procedure works again.
This is BAD. I can't have Windows updates blowing up my app. What am I doing wrong here? I must use the System.Management.dll in my CLR stored procedure but I can't have changes to Microsoft's files causing me to be unable to reference them as assemblies.
How can my CLR stored procedure assembly reference a Microsoft assembly such that changes to the Microsoft assembly does not cause version mismatches?
Starting saturday all of our SSIS packages on a server (64-bit) starting failing (hundreds of them) the error is:
Precompiled script failed to load. Attempting to reload the script with updated data. For more information, see the Microsoft Knowledge Base article, KB931846 (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=81885).
That Knowledgebase link talks about SP2 fixing the issue but we have SP2 already on the server. The sysdtslog90 table is just packed with these as each script inside each package is getting the same error. Looking at the system log the following were installed as part of windows update shortly before the errors started occuring:
- Update for Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition (KB936357)
- Security Update for Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition (KB926122)
- Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0: x64 (KB928416)
- Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 2.0 (KB928365)
- Security Update for Excel 2003 (KB936507)
- Update for Outlook 2003 Junk Email Filter (KB936557)
I am trying to install SQl express as part of a custom app.I have been able to use the template.ini to pass in all the parameters and install. installs fine,however the installation isnt browseable by remote machines due to the sqlserver.exe and sqlbrowser.exe not being in the windows firewall list. How can i add then to this list automatically at install time? or is there another way around this?
In testing, several people are testing on laptops.
The database on SQL Server Express is local, on the laptop. So is the client applicatioon. When they unplug from the Network, and go home to work, we get "Cannot Find Server" problems.
Why is this? Windows Authenentication turns off? or is it the fact that TCP / IP is open?
What can we do? If we use the SQL Server Authentication, it works.
If we shut down, plug into the network, restart, it works.
Hi there. I've created a windows forms app that connects to a sql server express database. now that it's working on my box, i need to install the entire solution on the end user's machine. what's the best way to move the database? I found this article: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms165716.aspx but i'm wondering if anyone can give me some insights based on your own experience. I'm using ms visual studio 2005 and sql server express 2005. I'm hoping that all i'll really have to do is copy everything over to the new machine and then edit my connection string in the .exe.config file for my app.
I am trying to install sql server 2005 express on 64 bit windows but i get a error message saying SQLncli_x64.msi file is missing and asks me to download it.
How can i fix this problem to install the SQL server on my Windows XP x64 Edition?
I would like my newly converted to .NET 2.0 Windows Forms application to use an Sql Express database instead of MSDE. Previously, development was done on the default SQL Server instance using the full SQL Server 7.0. When deployed, MSDE was used with a named instance. The connection string in the application settings needed to be modified as part of the deployment. Now I've converted to .NET 2.0 and to Sql Server 2005, and/or Sql Express.
What I'd really like to do now is have a project within my solution that, when built, creates the database by running scripts, and deploys that database to the output directory of the executable.
I want this to run as part of a continuous integration solution that, so that every so often, the entire project is checked out, built (code and data), all is copied to a bin/[debug,release] directory, unit tests run, etc.
im using windows xp pc, im new to SQL could any one provide details about how can i get connected to SQL management express using windows authentication,Im getting error CANNOT ABLE TO CONNECT TO SERVER...
I have changed SQL Server port to 2433, and add it to exception in Windows Firewall, add executive files as in this KB http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175043.aspx
Want to change port of SQL Server Browser as well, but dont know how to :(
anyway, after enable Firewall, SQL server is stop working. How to get it working with Firewall? Also, if some one lets me know how to change port of SQL Server Browser too, it would be great
im using windows xp pc, im new to SQL could any one provide details about how can i get connected to SQL management express using windows authentication,Im getting error CANNOT ABLE TO CONNECT TO SERVER...
I've developed an application that uses SQL server (in particular localdb), and, I have just pushed it out to the client.
The client runs Windows 8.1 x64, but, when I try to install either x86 or x64 version of SQL LocalDB direct from Microsoft, I keep getting this error:
Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Express LocalDB
Installation of this product failed because it is not supported on this operating system. For information on supported configurations, see the product documentation.
I am using LocalDB on my Windows 8.1 dev machine.... .Net framework 3.5 and 4 are both installed already.
Hi y'all, I just know that SQL Server Express Edition SP2 is being released by Microsoft recently, and from previous informations I gathered; it seemed that SQL Server 2005 Express Edition is not compatible with Windows Vista (any editions). With the release of SP2, does this mean SQL Server 2005 Express Edition is now compatible with Windows Vista? If so, do I have to install .NET Framework v2.0 first in my Windows Vista Business edition? BecauseI know that Vista Business edition already has .NET Framework v3.0 in it. Thanks for your help! Appreciate it...
This is my first time posting, so be gentle as I'm not exactly sure what the protocol here is regarding posting errors.
I'm encountering an issue with an installation of SQL 2005 Express (SQLEXPR_ADV.EXE) on a Windows 2000 Professional SP4 machine (Intel P4 1.8 Ghz). The following error is what I receive:
Setup.exe - Entry point not found:
The procedure entry point _create_local could not be located in the dynamic link library mscvr80.dll
< OK >
The following is what I see in the error log (C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFiles):
SQLSetup0007_SQL2005TEST_Core.log
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Setup beginning at Wed Dec 06 11:28:08 2006 Process ID : 452 c:98b179fcf692887ac3setup.exe Version: 2005.90.2047.0 Running: LoadResourcesAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:7 Complete: LoadResourcesAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:7, returned true Running: ParseBootstrapOptionsAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:7 Loaded DLL:c:98b179fcf692887ac3xmlrw.dll Version:2.0.3609.0 Complete: ParseBootstrapOptionsAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8, returned true Running: ValidateWinNTAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8 Complete: ValidateWinNTAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8, returned true Running: ValidateMinOSAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8 Complete: ValidateMinOSAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8, returned true Running: PerformSCCAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8 Complete: PerformSCCAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8, returned true Running: ActivateLoggingAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8 Complete: ActivateLoggingAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8, returned true Running: DetectPatchedBootstrapAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8 Complete: DetectPatchedBootstrapAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8, returned true Action "LaunchPatchedBootstrapAction" will be skipped due to the following restrictions: Condition "EventCondition: __STP_LaunchPatchedBootstrap__452" returned false. Running: PerformSCCAction2 at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8 Loaded DLL:C:WINNTsystem32msi.dll Version:3.1.4000.2435 Loaded DLL:C:WINNTsystem32msi.dll Version:3.1.4000.2435 Complete: PerformSCCAction2 at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8, returned true Running: PerformDotNetCheck at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8 Complete: PerformDotNetCheck at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8, returned true Running: ComponentUpdateAction at: 2006/11/6 11:28:8 Complete: ComponentUpdateAction at: 2006/11/6 11:45:55, returned true Running: DetectLocalBootstrapAction at: 2006/11/6 11:45:55 Complete: DetectLocalBootstrapAction at: 2006/11/6 11:45:55, returned true Running: LaunchLocalBootstrapAction at: 2006/11/6 11:45:55 Error: Action "LaunchLocalBootstrapAction" threw an exception during execution. Error information reported during run: "c:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup Bootstrapsetup.exe" finished and returned: 128 Aborting queue processing as nested installer has completed Message pump returning: 128
Notice the time jump; I did this to make sure I was looking at the right log file.
Any help is greatly appreciated as I'll be monitoring this thread closely. Searches of my error show that other people have received it as well, although no resolution has ever been forthcoming. Thanks in advance.
We are planning to setup SQL Express on a windows os clustered environment and trying to shoot for a active-passive configuration. We know that SQL server 2005 has this ability and will be leveraging that for mission critial production applications, however there are several other apps that we intend to use internally and would like to leverage windows clustering. Has anyone done this?
- Should we share the INSTALLSQLDATADIR? If yes, then how to specify the SQL Express installtion on cluster node#2 that, "hey..utilized this dir as the data dir".
- Or Should we not worry about it, and only the databases that we create for our apps be on the quorum/clustered resource drive?
I upgraded the OS on my SQL 2005 SP2 to Windows 2003 SP2. Everything still works fine but now Windows Update says that I need SQL 2005 SP2 again. I checked the version of SQL on the server and it's still SP2. Did the Windows service pack somehow downgrade parts of my SQL installation? I know I can probably just reinstall the SQL service pack but I was just curious...