SQL Server 2000 Standard On Windows 2000 Advanced Server
Jul 20, 2005What is the limitation of memory that SQL Server 2000 Standard can use
when running on a Windows 2000 Advanced Server platform?
ADVERTISEMENT
Windows 2000 Advanced Server On SQL 7.0
May 4, 2000We are testing our SQL 7.0 server on Windows 2000 Advanced Server.
We are getting some bottlenecks on stored procedures.
Has any one out there used this set up and if so what kind of problems have you seen?
Thanks,
Dianne
Windows 2003 Server SP2 To Be Applied On SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition SP3
Mar 17, 2008We got SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition SP3 running on Windows 2003 Standard Edition server.
Now, we would like to apply windows 2003 SP2 to the Operating System.
We are concerned that whether windows 2003 SP2 is compatible with SQL server 2000 (SP3)?
I was looking at the application compatibility chart for Windows 2003 SP2.Among them Microsoft SQL Server Standard (2000) was listed but with no Service pack details. And also does Standard means standard edition there?
My Question - Is windows 2003 server SP2 compatible with SQL Server 2000 (SP3) Standard Edition? And what if I plan to apply SP4 to Sql Server ?
Please help. Thanks
Upgrading SQL Server 2000 Standard To SQL Server 2000 Enterprise
Sep 14, 2004I am currently running SQL Server 2000 Standard on my production system, and I am looking to upgrade the system to Windows 2000 Adv. Server. I would also like to upgrade SQL Server 2000 Standard to SQL Server 2000 Enterprise to utilize more than 2GB of memory. Can anyone tell me what is the best way to upgrade the system, and please provide some feedback on your experiences with the upgrade. Thanks in advance.
View 2 Replies View RelatedUpgrate Sql Server 2000 Standard To Sql Server 2000 Enterprise
Sep 15, 2006Hi, I need to know if somebody knows like making the update of Standard SQL 2000 to Enterprise. Greetings.
View 3 Replies View RelatedVista Business ODBC/DSN To Remote Windows 2000 Server / SQL 2000
Oct 8, 2007Hi,
Just upgraded some development desktops to Vista Business. However we need
to still connect to some older remote windows 2000/SQL 2000 servers.
Trying to setup an ODBC system DSN on our Vista Business local desktop we get the
following errors -
-START ERROR WINDOW-
Connection Failed:
SQLState: '01000'
SQL Server Error: 772
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][TCP/IP Sockets]ConnectionOpen
(SECDoClientHandshake()0.
Connection failed:
SQLState: '08001'
SQL Server Error: 18
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][TCP/IP Sockets]SSL Security Error
-END ERROR WINDOW-
Any help greatly appreciated as this is stopping us from making
database/table connections etc. We've checked the firewall setup and all is well there.
PS - we can still connect fine using XP or windows 2000 desktops and their
local DSNs.
SQL Server 2000 Installation Problem On Windows 2000 Professional
Jul 20, 2005Hello,I received the error message below when i'm trying to install SQLServer 2000 standard edition into a Windows 2000 Professionaleworkstation.Error :Microsoft SQL server 2000 Standard Edition server components is notsupported on this operating system. Only client components will beavailable for installation.Any request modification ?Best regards,Thanks
View 1 Replies View RelatedWindows 2000 Sp4 && SQL Server 2000 Causes Java Core Dump
Sep 7, 2007I've just started getting this EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) on machines using Windows 2000 sp4 connecting to SQLServer. This is crashing JVMs (multiple Sun versions and BEA also) in the Java VM frame (outside our code). This has just started recently - perhaps with the last set of patches? Has anyone else seen this or know what I could do to get more information? Could this be related to updates to named pipes?
Thanks!
-Brian Temple
How Do SQL 2000 Service Packs Play A Role In Upgrading?i.e.Can SQL 2000 Standard With No SP Be Upgraded To SQL 2005 Standard
Aug 2, 2006How do SQL 2000 service packs play a role in upgrading? That is, can SQL 2000 Standard with no Service Packs(SP) be upgraded to SQL 2005 Standard, or does SQL 2000 Standard have to have a certain service pack??
View 1 Replies View RelatedAccess 2000 On Windows 2000 Can't Interact With SQL Server 7.0
Mar 13, 2001We have a SQL Server 7.0 system in NT 4.0 environment. We upgraded our users to Access 2000 and started to work with this. Now we installed a new
server which is Windows 2000 based and the domain is different from
the SQL servers domain. We then installed Access 2000 on Windows 2000
to use with terminal server. But I noticed that there was a problem
with the program. I then looked at the program which was written on Access 2000 and saw that the tables and views can't be seen. The program runs but
I can't see the views and tables. Another thing is access disconects from SQL Server when I want to see the tables. So what can be the problem.
In one part there is an Access 2000 on Windows 2000 server. On the other part SQL Server 7.0 on Windows NT 4.0. And Access can't see the tables in SQL server.
Sql 2000 Installation On Windows 2000 Advance Server
May 13, 2006I am trying to install microsoft sql server 2000 enterprise edition on a windows 2000 advance server. I keep getting error message
A previous program installation created pending file operations on the installation machine. You must restart the computer before running . I have restarted machine and no change.
What does error message mean and what is solution?
SQL Server 2000 Developer Vs SQL Server 2000 Standard
Nov 22, 2004I have installed the SQL Server 2000 developer that came with Office XP Developer. I now have a copy of SQL Server 2000 Standard. What will happen if I try to install the standard version? Will I loss any of my current database logins or settings, etc...?
Thank you for any help,
Degrade From SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition To SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition
Jul 24, 2007Hi,
Can we degrade from SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition to SQL Server 2000 Standand Edition without doing Uninstall and reinstall?
Thanks in advance,
Configure SQL Server 2000 For More Than 2GB RAM On Windows 2000 Server
Jul 19, 2007Hi,
I've a SQL Server 2000 (SP4) installed on Windows 2000 Server.
The system has 4GB RAM.
SQL Server not using more than 2GB RAM even I set the following.
AWE enabled.
Max server Memory (MB) : 3GB
SQLService account is enabled for "Lock Pages in Memory"
Can you please help what I'm missing here?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Mkarumuru
SQL Server Enterprise 2000 Edition Verse Standard Edition 2000
Jan 15, 2007Hi there
Our ISP hosts our data on SQL Server Enterprise, but I also going to host the databases on my local machine.
As it's just local would Standard edition do? If I migrate the databases over, will it work?
Thanks in advance.
Extended Memory For SQL7 On Advanced Server 2000
Jan 24, 2002Could anyone inform me how much the conventional memory SQL7 Enterprise on Advanced Server 2000 can have?
The SQL is on an active/active cluster. Currently each runs at 2GB of memory, with available memory for failover. I am planning to add another 2GB to each SQL node. Is this possible? Are there any configurations I need to do? Do I need to set AWE enabled? and How much?
Your help is greatly appreciate.
Jim
SQL Server 2000 On Windows 2000 Pro
Nov 25, 2004Dear Friends
Can I install SQL Server 2000 on Windows 2000 Professional, I have tried but message was "this platform is not supported" and only client components will be installed after installing, I was unable to create any database.
Please help me.
SQL 2000 Ent Ed (32-bit) On Windows 2000 Server R2
Nov 26, 2007
Can SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition (32-bit) be installed on a Windows 2003 Server R2 SP2 64-bit clustered system?
I have the Windows Cluster fully patched, but when I try to install SQL server 2000 Ent Ed (32-bit) from the directory 'd:englishsql2000entx86setupsetupsql.exe' it hangs after I enter the virtual server IP.
NB. I have successfully installed SQL 2000 Ent Ed (32-bit) on a clustered Windows 2003 Server (NOT R2)
Any help or pointers would be greatly appriciated.
SQL Server 2000 Database To SQL Server 2005 Standard Security Issue
Jan 12, 2006We have experienced an issue with back backup / restore of a database originating from SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2003.
We have the following setup:
SQL Server 2000
- DatabaseA
- asdfUser (SQL User)
- asdfUser is (dbowner) of DatabaseA
- DatabaseB
- asdfUser (SQL User)
- asdfUser is (dbowner) of DatabaseB
SQL Server 2005 Standard
-asdfUser is NOT Setup as a user yet.
-We restore DatabaseA and DatabaseB to the SQL Server 2005 Standard. The databases are restored with the security permissions of asdfUser being the DB Owner of DatabaseA and DatabaseB.
-We create a new SQL user named asdfUser on the SQL Server 2005 box. We then try to add the UserMapping of DBOWNER for the DatabaseA and DatabaseB. We receive an error message stating that the asdfUser already have permissions to the databases. We proceed with the user creation without those permissions.
-We proceed to the login properties of the asdfuser and view their UserMappings. The asdfUser does not have access to DatabaseA or DatabaseB. We then add the UserMapping of DBOWNER to both DatabaseA and DatabaseB. We Try to select OK and we receive an error message that states that the user already has those permissions.
-When we query the UserID's of the asdfUser that is in the database and the UserID of the asdfUser that is created, they are two different values.
I assume this is a bug... any word on a fix?
Is It Possible Run C# .net Standard Against SQL Server 2000?
Jan 13, 2005Hi all!
I keep getting an error when I try and create a new data connection. This is the error I'm getting:
Unable to connect to database.
It is only possible to connect to SQL Server Desktop Engine databases and Microsoft Access with this version of Visual Studio.
I can connect to Access without any problems. Is there anyway around this?
I'm using C# .net Standard with SQL Server 2000.
Thanks for any help.
Moving SQL Servr 2000 From Windows 2K Server To Windows 2K3
Apr 17, 2008
Does any one come across any difficulty in the following migration?
OS: Wondows Server 2K
DB: SQL Server 2K Standard Edition
Migrating to
OS: Wondows Server 2K3
DB: SQL Server 2K Standard Edition
Thank you,
Gish
SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition
Dec 9, 2004Can we install SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition on Win XP professional?
Thanks
Help With Installation Of Standard SQL Server 2000
Dec 12, 2004I have installed IIS, VS.NET 2003, .NET 2.0 Framework, and now I have tried to install the standard version of SQL Server 2000 and it is telling me that I can only install the client components. The O/S is Windows XP Pro on a laptop.
Thanks for any ideas,
SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition
Mar 5, 2002I am running Win2k Professional version SP2. I tried to install the SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition, I got error message said " MS Sql Server 2000 Standard Edition server component is not supported on this operating system. Only client components will be available for installation."
View 1 Replies View RelatedInstallation Of SQL Server 2000 Standard On XP Pro
Jan 25, 2004Im attempting to install SQL Server 2000 Standard on Windows XP Pro and it keeps returning to me an error:
"Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition server component is not supported on this operating system. Only client components will be available for installation."
Anybody have any idea what this means according to the documentation and previous posts on installation problems my operating system should support this edition of SQL server.
SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition
Jan 16, 2008
I am currently trying to migrate to a new computer. My old computer (Box 1) has Windows 2000 Ver 5.0 SP4 as an operating system. My new computer (Box 2) has Windows XP Professional Ver 5.1 SP2 as an operating system.
Currently, I have Microsoft SQL Server 2000 running on Box 1. When I used the CD to install the software on Box 2, it will not allow a full install. Just the Client portion. The exact message I get is "Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition is not supported on this operating system. Only client components will be available for installation.
How in the world do I get this software to install on Box 2? I've seen and downloaded, the service packs but I don't know where to go from there.
Thanks in advance for any help that you can provide.
Can't Connect .Net Application From Windows Server 2003 To Database Server (SQL Server 2000)
Apr 3, 2008Hi,
I am having a problem connecting my .net applications from the application server to the database server. When I run the application from my windows xp (sp2) box it works fine. When I try to connect via SQL Management Studio to the database server from the application server I get the same error.
Here is the error:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server)
Here is the Environment:
App Server:
Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition
Inside Company's Firewall/ Network
Database Server:
Windows Server 2000 Advanced Edition
SQL Server 2000 SP4
Remote Connections to the Server is checked
Enable Protocols: Named Pipes & TCP/IP
TCP/IP Port: 1402 (I don't know why it isn't the default of 1433)
The db server is sitting out side the Company's firewall (don't ask me why). I can access it fine from inside the firewall on my XP box but not from windows server 2003. There is a web server outside the our network that also connects to the db server with no problem and that is running Windows Server 2003 Web Edition.
I can ping the db server from the app server using the IP address.
I tried using the IP address and the port 1402 in my connection string but that didn't work from any machine (XP and Server).
I imagine the issue is somehow related to the company's firewall but why would it only block Windows Server 2003 and not XP?
What do I tell the network admin to change?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Oran
Memory Configurations For SQL Server 2005 EE X64 With SQL Server 2000 EE X32 On Windows Server EE X64 Server
Apr 20, 2007My server is a dual AMD x64 2.19 GHz with 8 GB RAM running under Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition with service pack 1 installed. We have SQL 2000 32-bit Enterprise installed in the default instance. AWE is enabled using Dynamically configured SQL Server memory with 6215 MB minimum memory and 6656 maximum memory settings.
I have now installed, side-by-side, SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition in a separate named instance. Everything is running fine but I believe SQL Server2005 could run faster and need to ensure I am giving it plenty of resources. I realize AWE is not needed with SQL Server 2005 and I have seen suggestions to grant the SQL Server account the 'lock pages in memory' rights. This box only runs the SQL 2000 and SQL 2005 server databases and I would like to ensure, if possible, that each is splitting the available memory equally, at least until we can retire SQL Server 2000 next year. Any suggestions?
How Many Concurrent Users With SQL Server 2000 Standard && 2GB ??
Dec 16, 2004Standard costs 2000 euros approx (5CALs)
Enterprise costs 40000 euros apprx
Standard only supports 2GB or RAM
How many concurrent users do you think standard edtion can handle in a Dual Xeon 2.8 with 2GB ram ?
Enterprise is very expensive. sucks that standard can't handle more than 2GB Ram
SQL Server 2000 Standard .. DB Size Limit
Dec 29, 2003Hi all.
On the MS website (at this URL: http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/overview/default.asp) it says that the Standard edition of SQL Server 2000 has a database size limit of 1,048,516 terabytes.
Talking to a friend, he tells me this is not true, and that it has a database size limit of 12gb.
Is Microsofts site incorrect, or is my friend lost?
Cheers! :-)
SQL Server 2000 Standard Memory Flatline
Jun 26, 2007Hi all,
We have an SQL 2000 Standard SP4 system with 3gb of RAM running on Windows 2003 Server R2 Standard.
The SQL memory usage of this server flatlines at around 1665mb and will not go any higher.
I understand SQL 2000 Standard on Windows 2003 Server Standard has a 2gb memory limit, however why wont the memory push up to this limit? The OS shows there is around 700mb of the 3076 unused (SQL uses 1660, windows uses around 700 making the maximum used around 2300 of the 3076)
I have set the /3gb switch on windows boot, I have changed the SQL memory configurations many different times. If I try and set 'min server memory' to anything over around 1500mb I get the error on SQL startup;
Warning: unable to allocate 'min server memory' of 1720mb
In the above example surely if the Server has a 2gb limit it should let me set say 1720/2048 ? or 1920/2048 or even 2048/2048, however anything over around 1500 generates the above error.
Our server continues to flatline at 1660mb, any help to squeeze out an extra 200-400mb of RAM would be appreciated or an explination as to why it can not be done.
Thanks for your help
Jim
Multiples Instance Of SQL Server 2000/SQL Server 7.0 On Windows Server 2003
Jul 23, 2005Hi,Is it possible to install on a Windows server 2003,SQL SERVER 2000 in the folowing configuration :SQL server 7.0 as a default InstanceandSQL server 2000 as a named instance.Thanks for your answer.
View 1 Replies View RelatedSQL Server 2000 Standard Or SQL Server Enterprise?
Feb 15, 2005Is SQL Server 2000 Standard an option for a web application ? OR Only Enterprise version should be used for a web application because the standard version cannot support fully a web application?
View 6 Replies View Related