I am trying to Write an update string for individual partID's. I wrote this query below but it isn't populating the time to test.
SELECT 'UPDATE Parts SET = [TimeToTest]' + ' ' +
Convert(varchar, (select test From [dbo].[db_PartsCats] as c Join Parts As P on P.category = C.CatID Where PartID = 48727))
+ ' ' + 'WHERE PartID = ' + CONVERT(varchar, P.PartID)
From Parts As P
Where FRID = 0 And TimeToTest = 0 and TimeToInstall = 0 and TimeToProgram = 0 And TimeToTrain = 0 And manufacturer = 187
Order By categoryMy results:
Should get UPDATE Parts SET = [TimeToTest] 0.5000 WHERE PartID = 48871 But getting Nulls instead
Ok I have a query "SELECT ColumnNames FROM tbl1" let's say the values returned are "age,sex,race".
Now I want to be able to create an "update" statement like "UPATE tbl2 SET Col2 = age + sex + race" dynamically and execute this UPDATE statement. So, if the next select statement returns "age, sex, race, gender" then the script should create "UPDATE tbl2 SET Col2 = age + sex + race + gender" and execute it.
i was tasked to created an UPDATE statement for 6 tables , i would like to update 4 columns within the 6 tables , they all contains the same column names. the table gets its information from the source table, however the data that is transferd to the 6 tables are sometimes incorrect , i need to write a UPDATE statement that will automatically correct the data. the Update statement should also contact a where clause
the columns are [No] , [Salesperson Code], [Country Code] and [Country Name]
i was thinking of doing
Update [tablename] SET [No] = CASE WHEN [No] ='AF01' THEN 'Country Code' = 'ZA7' AND 'Country Name' = 'South Africa' ELSE 'Null' END
I run the following statement and it will not update beyond 7 million plus rows and I have about 38 million to complete. I keep checking updated row counts and after 1/2 day it's still the same so I know something is wrong because it was rolling through no problem when I initiated it. I need to complete ASAP so it's adding to my frustration. The 'Acct_Num_CH' field is an encrypted field (fyi).
SET rowcount 10000 UPDATE [dbo].[CC_Info_T] SET [Acct_Num_CH] = 'ayIWt6C8sgimC6t61EJ9d8BB3+bfIZ8v' WHERE [Acct_Num_CH] IS NOT NULL WHILE @@ROWCOUNT > 0 BEGIN SET rowcount 10000 UPDATE [dbo].[CC_Info_T] SET [Acct_Num_CH] = 'ayIWt6C8sgimC6t61EJ9d8BB3+bfIZ8v' WHERE [Acct_Num_CH] IS NOT NULL END SET rowcount 0
I am unable to update the data using record by record below scenario.
Required output:
patient will able to Admit/Re-admit multiple times in hospital, if a patient readmitted multiple times in hospital after the first visit, first visit record will get Re-admission=0 and Index=1. This visit should cal Index_Admission of that patient. using this index_admission should calculate the 30-day readmission.
Current Output:
Calculation: From index_admission discharge date to next admit_visit date,
1) if the diff is having less than 30 days, readmission=1 and Index=0
else readmission=0 and Index=1 should be update.
For checking this every time should check using the latest index_admission discharge_date.
To get this result i written below logic, but it's updating readmission=0 and Index=1 after 30-day post discharge of using first index admission.
UPDATE Readmission SET Index_AMI = (CASE WHEN DATEDIFF(DD, (SELECT Sub.Max_Index_Dis FROM (SELECT Patient_ID, MAX(Discharge_Date_Time) Max_Index_Dis FROM Readmission WHERE Index_AMI = 1 AND FPR.Patient_ID = Patient_ID GROUP BY Patient_ID) Sub) , FPR.Admit_Date_Time) between 0 and 31 THEN 0 ELSE 1 END),
I have a simple update statement (see example below) that when runs, I expect to see the number of records updated in the Results tab. This information shows up in the Messages tab; however, what is displayed in the Results tab is (No column name) 40. From where the 40 is being generated. I have tried restarting SSMS 2012, restarting my computer, turning NOCOUNT on and off.
"UPDATE TableA SET Supervisor = 'A123' WHERE PersonnelNumber = 'B456'"
I have created a Dynamic Merge statement SCD2 Store procedure , which insert the records if no matches and if bbxkey matches from source table to destination table thne it updates old record as lateteverion 0 and insert new record with latest version 1.
I am getting below error when I ahve more than 1 bbxkey in my source table. How can I ignore this.
BBXkey is nothing but I am deriving by combining 2 columns.
Msg 8672, Level 16, State 1, Line 6
The MERGE statement attempted to UPDATE or DELETE the same row more than once. This happens when a target row matches more than one source row. A MERGE statement cannot UPDATE/DELETE the same row of the target table multiple times. Refine the ON clause to ensure a target row matches at most one source row, or use the GROUP BY clause to group the source rows.
I have a stored proc that contains an update which utilizes a case statement to populate values in a particular column in a table, based on values found in other columns within the same table. The existing update looks like this (object names and values have been changed to protect the innocent):
UPDATE dbo.target_table set target_column = case when source_column_1= 'ABC'then 'XYZ' when source_column_2= '123'then 'PDQ'
[Code] ....
The powers that be would like to replace this case statement with some sort of table-driven structure, so that the mapping rules defined above can be maintained in the database by the business owner, rather than having it embedded in code and thus requiring developer intervention to perform changes/additions to the rules.
The rules defined in the case statement are in a pre-defined sequence which reflects the order of precedence in which the rules are to be applied (in other words, if a matching value in source_column_1 is found, this trumps a conflicting matching value in source_column_2, etc). A case statement handles this nicely, of course, because the case statement will stop when it finds the first "hit" amongst the WHEN clauses, testing each in the order in which they are coded in the proc logic.
What I'm struggling with is how to replicate this using a lookup table of some sort and joins from the target table to the lookup to replace the above case statement. I'm thinking that I would need a lookup table that has column name/value pairings, with a sequence number on each row that designates the row's placement in the precedence hierarchy. I'd then join to the lookup table somehow based on column names and values and return the match with the lowest sequence number, or something to that effect.
I have a four tables called plandescription, plandetail and analysisdetail. The table plandescription has the columns DetailQuestionID which is the primary and identity column and a QuestionDescription column.
The table plandetail consists of the column PlanDetailID which the primary and identity column, DetailQuestionID which is the foreign key attribute of plandescription table and a planID column.
The third table analysisdetail consists of a analysisID which the primary and identity column, PlanDetailID which is the foreign key attribute of plandetail table and a scenario.
Below is the schema of the three tables
I have a two web form that will insert, update and delete data into these three tables in a two transaction. One web form will perform CRUD operations in plandescription and plandetail table. When the user inserts QuestionDescription and planid in this web form, I will insert the QuestionDescription Value in the plandescription table and will generate a DetailQuestionID value and this value is fed to the plandetail table with the planid. Here I will generate a PlanDetailID.
Once this transaction is done, I will show the second web form in which the user enters the scenario and this will be mapped with the plandescription using the PlanDetailID.
This schema cannot be changes as this is the client requirement. When I insert values I don’t have any problem. However when I update existing data, I need to delete existing PlanDetailID in the plandetail table and recreate PlanDetailID data for that DetailQuestionID and planID. This is because, the user will be adding or deleting a planID associated with the QuestionDescription.
Once I recreate PlanDetailID for that DetailQuestionID and planID, I need to update the old PlanDetailID with the new PlanDetailID in the third table analysisdetail for the associated analysisID.
I created a #Temp table called #DetailTable to insert the values analysisID, planid and old PlanDetailID and new PlanDetailID so that I can have them in update statement once I delete the data from plandetail table for that PlanDetailID.
Then I deleted the plandetailid from the plandetail table and recreate PlanDetailID for that DetailQuestionID. During my recreation I fetched the new PlanDetailID’s created into another temp table called #InsertedRows
After this I am running a while loop to update the temp table #DetailTable with the newly created PlanDetailID for the appropriate planID’s. The problem is here. When I have the same number of planID’s for example 2 planID’s 1,2 I will have only two old PlanDetailID and new PlanDetailID for that planID and analysisID.But When I add a new PlanID or remove a existing planID I am getting null value for that newly added or deleted planID. This is affecting my update statement of analysisdetail table as PlanDetailID cannot be null.
I tried to remove the Null value from the #DetailTable by running the update statement of analysis detail in a while loop however its not working.
DECLARE @categoryid INT = 8 DECLARE @DetailQuestionID INT = 1380 /*------- I need the query to run for the below three data. Here i'm updating my planids that already exists in my database*/ DECLARE @planids VARCHAR(MAX) = '2,4,5'
How I am using a CASE statement within a WHERE clause to filter data:
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.GetSomeStuff @filter1 varchar(100) = '', @filter2 varchar(100) = '' AS BEGIN SELECT
[Code] .
What I want, is to be able to pass in a single value to filter the table, or if I pass in (at the moment a blank) for no filter to be applied to the table.
Is this a good way to accomplish that, or is there a better way? Also, down the line I'm probably going to want to have multiple filter items for a single filter, what would be the best way to implement that?
I am trying to run an update statement against a vendor's database that houses HR information. If I run a regular select statement against the database with the following query, it returns without error:
SELECT "QUDDAT_DATA"."QUDDAT-INT", "NAME"."INTERNET-ADDRESS", "QUDDAT_DATA"."QUDFLD-FIELD-ID", "QUDDAT_DATA"."QUDTBL-TABLE-ID" FROM "SKYWARD"."PUB"."NAME" "NAME", "SKYWARD"."PUB"."QUDDAT-DATA" "QUDDAT_DATA" WHERE ("NAME"."NAME-ID"="QUDDAT_DATA"."QUDDAT-SRC-ID") AND "QUDDAT_DATA"."QUDTBL-TABLE-ID"=0 AND "QUDDAT_DATA"."QUDFLD-FIELD-ID"=16 AND "QUDDAT_DATA"."QUDDAT-INT"=11237When I try to convert it into an
[Code] ....
I am assuming I am receiving this error because it doesn't know where to find QUDDAT-INT? How can I fix that?
The "QUDDAT-INT" column houses the employee number. So in the case of the SELECT query above, I am testing against a specific employee number.
Hi Group!I am having a problem of using SUM under UPDATE statement. I understandthat SQL does not allow me to use SUM in UPDATE, but unfortunately, Ican not find a way to get around it. Can someone please give me someidea? Thanks a million!--Here is the criteria:Under the same PORTFOLIO_ID, if the ACCOUNT_OPENDATE is in the samemonth as the PORTFOLIO_OPENDATE, then sum the account_openamt for thesame PRODUCT, and update the CHECKING_OPENAMT, SAVINGS_OPENAMT,CD_OPENAMT, etc in table PORTFOLIO. For other accounts opened NOT inthe same month as the PORTFOLIO_OPENDATE, just ignore them.--Here are the tablescreate table portfolio(portfolio_id int,portfolio_opendate smalldatetime,checking_openamt money,savings_openamt money,cd_openamt money)insert into portfolio values(1,'2/15/2005',0,0,0)create table account(portfolio_id int,product varchar(20),account_opendate smalldatetime,account_openamt money)insert into account values(1,'checking','2/15/2005',2000)insert into account values(1,'checking','2/20/2005',3000)insert into account values(1,'savings','2/20/2005',3000)insert into account values(1,'cd','5/15/2005',5000)--Ideal Output--id portfolio_opendatechecking_openamtsavings_openamtcd_openamt1 2/15/2005500030000--Here is my query:update portfolioset checking_openamt=sum(b.account_openamt) --problem appears!from portfolio as ajoin account as bon a.id=b.idand year(a.portfolio_opendate)=year(b.account_opendate )and month(a.portfolio_opendate)=month(b.account_openda te)and product ='checking'--and product='savings'--and product='cd'Thanks again!!
hi myself avii am developing one appliacaion in which i am using vb 6 as front end,adodb as database library and sql sever 7 as backend.i want to update one table for which i required data from other table. andiretrive data from second table by giving some condition. when i get data,then to update first table i need to use do while loop. instead of that iwant to use select statement directly in update query.plz give me some help.following is the my queries and its out putStrSql = ""StrSql = "Select * From SalesVchMaterialDesc where TransactionID=" &txtTransactionID.text & ""rsMName.Open StrSql, Conn, adOpenKeysetDo While Not rsMName.EOFStrSql = ""StrSql = "Update StockTable Set Outward=Outward - " &rsMName("Netweight") & ",OutwardQty=OutwardQty - " & rsMName("Qty") & "Where MaterialId=" & rsMName("Material_Name") & " and VoucherDate='" &Format(rsMName("VoucherDate"), "mm/dd/yyyy") & "'RsAdd.Open StrSql, Conn, adOpenStaticrsMName.MoveNextLooprsMName.Closeout put***main querySelect * From SalesVchMaterialDesc where TransactionID=848do while not loopUpdate StockTable Set Outward=Outward - 8.06,OutwardQty=OutwardQty - 1Where MaterialId=221 and VoucherDate='04/01/2004' and SMID=0loop
To avoid locking/blocking, or in transaction scope, we are trying make a common practice of writing coide for update commands in our all SPs based on primary key columns in where clause. I have a following scenario...
UPDATE [dbo].[TL_CST_Locker_Issuance] SET [isActive] = 0 WHERE LockerIssuanceId IN (SELECT LockerIssuanceId
[Code] ...
What is the better approach and should be followed to avoid locks and gain performance or best approach.
table A: | ID | FRUIT | VEGETABLE | GOOD | -------------------------------------------- | 1 | orange | cabbage | no | | 1 | apple | lettuce | yes | | 1 | kiwi | broccoli | no | | 1 | pear | kale | yes |
table B: | ID | FRUIT | VEGETABLE | ------------------------------- | 1 | apple | lettuce | | 2 | pear | kale |
If the fruit and vegetable in table A is found in table B, then set the GOOD column = yes, else no.
This is what I have so far.
update tableA set GOOD = (case when tableA.id = C.id then 'yes' else 'no' end ) from (select tableA.id as id from tableA A left join tableB B on B.fruit = A.fruit and B.vegetable = A.vegetable) C
I have created a table(T1) from select query result, that Select query is parameterised. Now I need to update the select query table(T1) based on the result every time.
Below is my Query:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[RPT_Cost_copy] SELECT MEII.*, SIMM.U_SP2DC, UPPER(SIMM.U_C3C2) AS GRP3,sb.cost, PREV.Z1, PREV.Z3, SB.Z2, SB.Z4,SIMM.U_C3DC1 AS FAM INTO T1 FROM (SELECT a.meu, a.mep2, SUM(a.mest) as excst FROM mei as A WHERE a.myar=@yr and a.mprd=@mth AND LTRIM(A.MCU) <> '' AND LTRIM(A.MRP2) <> ''
I have a table which I need to obtain data from but am having a problem with select statement. Specifically, I have a table that has multiple records for a particular hostName where the name of the host is either a shortname (say "Larry") or a long name (say "Larry's"). I need to display only the long names (NOT THE SHORT NAME records with the similar hostName). Select winsHostName, len(winsHostName) from winsData where winsClientIPAddress IN (SELECT winsClientIPAddress from winsData Group By winsClientIPAddress Having count(winsClientIpAddress) > 1) Order by winsHostName Which returns data Name Length ATVDDR 6 ATVDDR1 7 This is a s far as I can get but, Now, I need to list all remaining table fields based on the Name with the longer length and this is where I run into trouble. The output should read per below with the remaining table fields which I cannot seem to extract with nested select statement Name IP Addr Location ATVDDR1 1.1.1.1 2ndFloor I tried adding another GROUP BY by this gets me no where because I do not need to execute another aggregate in select statement. Maybe I need to use INNER JOIN Please advise any assistance.
I am trying to speed up my update statements by removing inner selectstatements.Example:update orders set shipname = (select contactName fromcustomers where customerid = orders.customerID)I read some articles which said that I should be able to use an innerjoin on the update statement like the following:update orders set shipname = (select contactName from customers wherecustomerid = orders.customerID)But every time that I run this statement I get the follwing error:Server: Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 1Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'inner'.Any Help will be greatly appreciated.Thank you.
I'm getting the following error message 'An aggregate may not appear in the set list of an UPDATE statement' What is the proper way to carry out an update on aggregates?
I have a query that displays a bunch of fields, specifically a createdon field and closedate field.I need to find the diff in days between date1 and date2 and only disiplay those results.For example: where the NumDays = a certain value. For example, 81.I have the NumDays displaying in the query, but I don't know how to reference these values in the where clause.
Curious if I have the code below as an example and I execute this code does sql execute from top to bottom? And does the Update run and complete before the delete occurs? Or does SQL execute the update and delete in parallel?
