In the Sql below, sample from William Pearson, the amount Spend is in descending order and the Rank number is in ascending order. Like this:
Spend Rank
24 1
12 2
10 3
9 4
What I wish to accomplish is:
Spend Rank (descending)
24 4
12 3
10 2
9 1
Please let me know what I need to accomplish it.
Thanks for the help
Victor
SELECT
CompanyName, Spend,
(SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
ACC0704 AS CoSpendTotal
WHERE
ACC0704.Spend <= CoSpendTotal.Spend)
AS Rank
FROM
ACC0704
ORDER BY
Spend DESC
Given the following results: col0 col1 col2 THY 2,265,850 31 VIE 1,474,994 20 RID 1,221,800 17 ACC 1,124,335 15 FEI 445,184 6 DIR 433,783 6 ROM 324,365 4
What is the best way in a query to get the rank of the returned rows by either col1 or col2. In other words who's the number 1,2,3 etc...
total count col0 = 7 total col1 = 7,290,310 total col2 (would eqaul 100%)= 99%
Looking for a mathmatical solution to this any help would be appreciated.
I have a table with 22 million Business records. I can see that there are duplicates when I group by BusinessName and Address and Phone. I'd like to place only the duplicates into a table, with a ranking, oldest business key gets a ranking of 1.
As a bonus I'd like each group to have a distinct group name (although not necessary, just want to know how to do this)
Later after I run more verifications to make sure these are not referenced elsewhere I'll delete everything with a matchRank > 1 out of the main Business table.
DROP TABLE [dbo].[TestBusiness]; GO CREATE TABLE [dbo].[TestBusiness]( [Business_pk] INT IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [BusinessName] VARCHAR (200) NOT NULL, [Address] VARCHAR(MAX) NOT NULL,
SOFWARES TABLE SOFTWARE_ID SOFTWARE_NAME -------------- ----------------- 1 X 2 Y 3 Z
I need a result like; COMPANY_ID COMAPNY_NAME SOFTWARES ------------- ---------------- ------------ 10 My Company X, Y, Z
I've used a query like;
SELECT COMPANY_ID ,COMPANY_NAME ,( SELECT SOFTWARE_NAME FROM COMPANY_SOFTWARES COS, SOFTWARES S WHERE S.SOFTWARE_ID=CS.SOFTWARE_ID AND COS.COMPANY_ID = C.COMPANY_ID ) AS SOFWARE_NAMES FROM COMPANY C WHERE AND C.COMPANY_ID = 10
But I get an error message; Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
I've read that in MySQL there is CONCAT function for the result I want but I couldn't find any solution in MSSQL server, any solutions, suggestions?
i have two tables Student  and Daily Attendance with following structure ,as i want to extract students of a class order by roll number which are not in Daily Attendance table , i know it will be solved by subquery but I don't know how to solve it.
Student:-
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Student]( [Student_Id] [bigint] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [Course_Id] [smallint] NULL,  //Foreign key [Class_Id] [int] NULL,  //Foreign key [Batch_Year] [varchar](20) NULL, [Student_Initials] [varchar](20) NULL,
We are running sql server 2005 standard edition. In the query below, it has top percent clause in the subquery and returns various rows, 2, or 3, or 4 rows each times when running manually one after another. Does anyone have an explaination?
SELECT dbo.WOB_STEP.STEP_UID FROM dbo.WOB_STEP INNER JOIN dbo.CURRENT_DATES CD1 ON (dbo.WOB_STEP.CD_UID=CD1.CD_UID) WHERE ( dbo.WOB_STEP.STEP_UID IN (SELECT TOP (50) PERCENT WITH TIES STEP_UID FROM dbo.vWOB_STEP_RANDOM WHERE OPERATOR_NAME = 'Jennelyn Llobrera' AND VENDOR_RETURN_FLAG = 1 ORDER BY RandomID) )
This is probably very elementary to someone more experienced, but I'm having a hard time coming up with a way to do the following:
SELECT * FROM Transactions WHERE MyField LIKE (SELECT MyValues FROM SearchValues)
But I can't because the subquery will return multiple rows. That's all I'm really trying to do - search all the rows in Transactions.MyField for any of the search values returned from the subquery.
And I can't restructure the SearchValues table to combine them into a single-row comma-delimited field or anything like that.
Hi there, I need to select rows from a table, but include the top 3 rows of another linked table as a single field in the results. Here is my basic structure:
I don't know if this is possible, but I haven't been able to find anyinformation.I have two tables, for example:Table 1 (two columns, id and foo)id foo--- -----1 foo_a2 foo_b3 foo_cTable 2 (two columns, t1_id, and bar)t1_id bar------ ----1 bar_a1 bar_b1 bar_c2 bar_d3 bar_e3 bar_fWhat I'm shooting for is returning the result of a subquery as atext-delimited column. In this example, using a comma as thedelimiter:Recordset Returned:foo bars----- -----foo_a bar_a,bar_b,bar_cfoo_b bar_dfoo_c bar_e,bar_fI know that it's usually pretty trivial within the code that isquerying the database, but I'm wondering if the database itself can dothis.Is this possible, and if so, can someone please point me to how it canbe done?
hello friends.. I am newbie for sql server...I having a problem when executing this procedure .... ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spgetvalues] @Uid intASBEGIN SET NOCOUNT ON; select DATEPART(year, c.fy)as fy, (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like 'Retire-Plan B-1% JRF' ) as survivorship, (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like 'Gross Earnings' and ) as ytdgross, (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like 'Retire-Plan B-1.5% JRP') as totalcontrib, from wh_contribute c where c.uid=@Uid Order by fy Asc .....what is the wrong here?? " Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression."please reply asap...
I am getting 2 resultsets depending on conditon, In the secondconditon i am getting the above error could anyone help me..........CREATE proc sp_count_AllNewsPapers@CustomerId intasdeclare @NewsId intset @NewsId = (select NewsDelId from NewsDelivery whereCustomerId=@CustomerId )if not exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count( NewsPapersId) from NewsPapersendif exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count(NewsDelId) from NewsDelivery whereCustomerid=@CustomeridendGO
Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
while running the following query.
SELECT DISTINCT EmployeeDetails.FirstName+' '+EmployeeDetails.LastName AS EmpName,
LUP_FIX_DeptDetails.DeptName AS CurrentDepartment,
LUP_FIX_DesigDetails.DesigName AS CurrentDesignation,
LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.ProjectName AS CurrentProject,
ManagerName=(SELECT E.FirstName+' '+E.LastName
FROM EmployeeDetails E
INNER JOIN LUP_EmpProject
ON E.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid
INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails
ON LUP_EmpProject.Projectid = LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Projectid
WHERE LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Managerid = E.Empid)
FROM EmployeeDetails
INNER JOIN LUP_EmpDepartment
ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDepartment.Empid
INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_DeptDetails
ON LUP_EmpDepartment.Deptid=LUP_FIX_DeptDetails.Deptid
AND LUP_EmpDepartment.Date=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpDepartment.Date
FROM LUP_EmpDepartment
WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDepartment.Empid
ORDER BY LUP_EmpDepartment.Date DESC)
INNER JOIN LUP_EmpDesignation
ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDesignation.Empid
INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_DesigDetails
ON LUP_EmpDesignation.Desigid=LUP_FIX_DesigDetails.Desigid
AND LUP_EmpDesignation.Date=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpDesignation.Date
FROM LUP_EmpDesignation
WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDesignation.Empid
ORDER BY LUP_EmpDesignation.Date DESC)
INNER JOIN LUP_EmpProject
ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid
AND LUP_EmpProject.StartDate=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpProject.StartDate
FROM LUP_EmpProject
WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid
ORDER BY LUP_EmpProject.StartDate DESC)
INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails
ON LUP_EmpProject.Projectid=LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Projectid
I've running the below query for months ans suddenly today started getting the following error :"Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression."
Any ideas as to why??
SELECT t0.DocNum, t0.Status, t0.ItemCode, t0.Warehouse, t0.OriginNum, t0.U_SOLineNo, ORDR.NumAtCard, ORDR.CardCode, OITM_1.U_Cultivar, RDR1.U_Variety, (SELECT OITM.U_Variety FROM OWOR INNER JOIN WOR1 ON OWOR.DocEntry = WOR1.DocEntry INNER JOIN OITM INNER JOIN OITB ON OITM.ItmsGrpCod = OITB.ItmsGrpCod ON WOR1.ItemCode = OITM.ItemCode WHERE (OITB.ItmsGrpNam = 'Basic Fruit') AND (OWOR.DocNum = t0.DocNum)) AS Expr1, OITM_1.U_Organisation, OITM_1.U_Commodity, OITM_1.U_Pack, OITM_1.U_Grade, RDR1.U_SizeCount, OITM_1.U_InvCode, OITM_1.U_Brand, OITM_1.U_PalleBase, OITM_1.U_Crt_Pallet, OITM_1.U_LabelType, RDR1.U_DEPOT, OITM_1.U_PLU, RDR1.U_Trgt_Mrkt, RDR1.U_Wrap_Type, ORDR.U_SCCode FROM OWOR AS t0 INNER JOIN ORDR ON t0.OriginNum = ORDR.DocNum INNER JOIN RDR1 ON ORDR.DocEntry = RDR1.DocEntry AND t0.U_SOLineNo - 1 = RDR1.LineNum INNER JOIN OITM AS OITM_1 ON t0.ItemCode = OITM_1.ItemCode WHERE (t0.Status <> 'L')
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2191 (Intel IA-64)
Mar 27 2006 11:51:52
Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)
sp_dboption 'BB_XXXXX'
The following options are set:
-----------------------------------
trunc. log on chkpt.
auto create statistics
auto update statistics
OK, the problem is that if a run the below query in server01, i get error 512:
Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
But, if run the same query in the server02, the query work fine -.
I know that I can use IN, EXISTS, TOP, etc ... but I need understand this behavior.
I am trying to add the results of both of these queries together:
The purpose of the first query is to find the number of nulls in the TimeZone column.
Query 1:
SELECT COUNT(*) - COUNT (TimeZone) FROM tablename
The purpose of the second query is to find results in the AAST, AST, etc timezones.
Query 2:
SELECT COUNT (TimeZone) FROM tablename WHERE TimeZone NOT IN ('EST', 'MST', 'PST', 'CST')
Note: both queries produce a whole number with no decimals. Ran individually both queries produce accurate results. However, what I would like is one query which produced a single INT by adding both results together. For example, if Query 1 results to 5 and query 2 results to 10, I would like to see a single result of 15 as the output.
What I came up with (from research) is:
SELECT ((SELECT COUNT(*) - COUNT (TimeZone) FROM tablename) + (SELECT COUNT (TimeZone) FROM tablename WHERE TimeZone NOT IN ('EST', 'MST', 'PST', 'CST'))
I get a msq 102, level 15, state 1 error.
I also tried
SELECT ((SELECT COUNT(*) - COUNT (TimeZone) FROM tablename) + (SELECT COUNT (TimeZone) FROM tablename WHERE TimeZone NOT IN ('EST', 'MST', 'PST', 'CST')) as IVR_HI_n_AK_results
but I still get an error. For the exact details see:
[URL]
NOTE: the table in query 1 and query 2 are the same table. I am using T-SQL in SQL Server Management Studio 2008.
SELECT[RANK] ,[KEY],idc.* FROMFREETEXTTABL (dbo.indice,mcaNombre,fabNombre,catNombre), 'ropa adidas nike', LANGUAGE 3082, 5) res left join dbo.indice idc with (nolock) on idc.idcCodigo=res.[key] ORDER BY [RANK] DESC;
Result:
RANK KEY 182 03 04 01
Why idcCods's 1 and 2 have different rank?? because idcCod's 3 and 4 affects ?? or it's just thinks of language??
Ok. Im not able to understand this logic please help. As you can see we have 2 columns of ranks, 1)normal 2)corrective. what is the logic behind this and how do u write a query for this? these ranks are for the Salary Column. Imran, "You truly do not know someone untill you fight them."-THE MATRIX.
EmpID Empname EmpSalary RankNormal RankCorrective 1 A 150001 1 2 B 100002 4 3 C 150001 1 4 D 40003 5 5 E 150001 1 6 F 15004 6 7 G 15004 6 8 H 5005 8
Hi All, Please let me know the equivalent of RANK() over ( order by...) in SQL server 2000. I thought this was supported in SQL server 2000. Please let me know if there exists a user defined function. Thanks in Advance.
I would like to write a query that gives me the values of a set ofobservations, and their rank.CREATE TABLE #Values(val int)INSERT #Values SELECT 1INSERT #Values SELECT 5INSERT #Values SELECT 10I would like to select this:1 10 -- rank 1, value 102 53 1I can put them into a temp table with an identity column, ordered bythe column I'm interested in, and then retrieve in order by theidentity column. I'm wondering if there's a way to do that with asubquery.Thanks,Jim
I've written a bunch of code using contains for fts. Then as I was trying to run the sorting, I realized that I have to use containstable in order to sort by rank. Is that correct? When I was using contains, I just used it as a where clause so I would have something like...
WHERE ((PostedUntil >= '5/22/2006') AND (SiteId=199)) AND (CONTAINS (PositionTitle, '"sales"') OR CONTAINS (Description, '"sales"'))
From the examples I've seen, in order to use containstable, I have to join a new dynamic table to the freetext enabled table and it only uses 1 containstable phrase for the new table. In my case, I may have multiple containstable phrases, so would they all fall in a () set like..
FROM Categories AS FT_TBL INNER JOIN (CONTAINSTABLE (table, col1, searchphrase) OR (CONTAINSTABLE(table, col2, searchphrase2) OR CONTAINSTABLE (table, col3, searchphrase3)) AS KEY_TBL
... or would each containstable have to be a new join? I don't want to spend anymore time going back and rewriting code just to test it since it's about a days worth of recoding. Thanks.
ive created a photo sharing site, and im trying to show the statisics for certain users, so far i can COUNT all the photos the user has upload, and show them in descending order, but i need to be able to see the ranking of the user, like :
until recently ive been using a rank equation to calculate rank,
essentially doing a select statement and selecting this as the rank field, where query 2 is the same as query 1:
((select count(*) from (query1) where (query1).value < (query2).value) +1)) as Rank
problem is that this is now running like a dog (takes 10 secs) and i'd like to try and do this another way- 2005 has a rank function, how can i do this in 2000?
here is the full statement :
SELECT StudentId, GCSE_Score, LTRIM(STR ((SELECT COUNT(*) FROM dbo.[Score2004-05] WHERE GCSE_score < s.GCSE_Score) + 1)) AS GCSE_Rank, SetId FROM dbo.[Score2004-05] S WHERE (SetId = '2004/2005')
I need help in understanding how the rank is calculated in FREETEXTABLE. I have a following query
select ft_tbl.saon ,ft_tbl.paon ,ft_tbl.street ,ft_tbl.postcode ,key_tbl.rank from temp as ft_tbl INNER JOIN freetextTABLE(temp, (saon, paon, street), '80 ridge avenue', 15) as key_tbl ON FT_tbl.ID = key_tbl.[key]
First, the resulting rows does have one record which has an address 80 ridge avenue but it appears at 15th place. Ideally it should appear on 1st. All the ranks of the results are same.
Second, the results are also showing two rows which does not contain the specified search string at all. They not only appears above in the resulting table but also have the same rank as the result in question (80 ridge avenue). For example result shows €œLong Ridges, Flat 21, Fortis Green€? at fifth place which is no way near the search string. And actual record shows up at 15th Place
Is there any way we can influence the rank to show exact match first. Just to clarify I have removed the digits from noise file as we need to search house numbers. Digits appears in noise file as default.
I have a report created and within the report is columns that perform additions on the fields from the database.
I want to create a rank column to show the rank of the row compare with the rest.
Col1 Col2 Total Ranks 1 2 3 3 2 3 5 1 2 2 4 2
On the above Col 1 and 2 would come form my database, Total is calculated by the report. How can I get ranking on this total? I cannot sort by the total as the report should only showing rankings but not be ordered by the rank.
I am using SQL Server 2005 Reporting Services...anny help is much appreciated.
(SELECT JumpHeight, DogIdent, MIN(RunDate) as "MinRunDate", COUNT(Event_ID) AS "NoEvents",
RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY JumpHeight ORDER BY COUNT(Event_ID) DESC, MIN(RunDate)) AS "HeightRank"
FROM EventData
WHERE Event=@Event
GROUP BY JumpHeight, DogIdent) AS xx, Dogs, DogOwner
WHERE (Dogs.Breed = @Breed AND xx.DogIdent = Dogs.DogIdent and Dogs.Owner_ID = DogOwner.Owner_ID) AND
(xx.HeightRank <= 10)
ORDER BY xx.JumpHeight, xx.HeightRank
produces this output:
Jump Ht.
Rank
# of Events
First Event
Owner
Call Name
08
3
1
2/19/2006
Some Owner
Otto
08
4
1
3/12/2006
Some Owner
Schotzie
I want it to produce this output:
Jump Ht.
Rank
# of Events
First Event
Owner
Call Name
08
1
1
2/19/2006
Some Owner
Otto
08
2
1
3/12/2006
Some Owner
Schotzie
I have tried several things and cannot correct the problem. Obviously, RANK is being evaluated in the wrong place, but placing it elsewhere has failed to produce the above results.
Hi,All, I have one table like this UserID,Name,GameScore 1 A 25 2 B 23 3 C 22 4 D 25 5 E 23 6 F 26 Now i want the query which return like this Name Score Rank F 26 1 A 25 2 D 25 2 B 23 3 E 23 3 C 22 4 Can anyone give me the sql 2000 query for this
i want to create a report so that a list of the top 30 records are returned to the report user. In the report i want to have the records position in the list shown (ie the first row should have 1. and the second should be 2. right on down to the 30th having 30.)
i am trying to create a rank formula.i just need to return the highest MCC count for the mcc code and return the seller code...So eg row 3 and 4, there are two MMC CODE called 4772, i need the formula to return the seller code r10, this is because r10 has 9 counts against that mcc code, and r03 has 9,
