Am I going about this the right way? I want to find pairs of entities
in a table that have some relationship (such as a field being the
same), so I
select t1.id, t2.id from sametable t1 join sametable t2 on
t1.id<>t2.id
where t1.fieldx=t2.fieldx ...
The trouble is, this returns each pair twice, e.g.
B C
C B
M N
N M
Is there a way to do this kind of thing and only get each pair once?
Kerry
Have a pretty simple wuestion but the answer seems to be evading me:
Here's the DDL for the tables in question:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Office] (
[OfficeID] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,
[ParentOfficeID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[WebSiteID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[IsDisplayOnWeb] [bit] NOT NULL ,
[IsDisplayOnAdmin] [bit] NOT NULL ,
[OfficeStatus] [char] (1) NOT NULL ,
[DisplayORD] [smallint] NOT NULL ,
[OfficeTYPE] [varchar] (10) NOT NULL ,
[OfficeNM] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[OfficeDisplayNM] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[OfficeADDR1] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[OfficeADDR2] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[OfficeCityNM] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[OfficeStateCD] [char] (2) NOT NULL ,
[OfficePostalCD] [varchar] (15) NOT NULL ,
[OfficeIMG] [varchar] (100) NOT NULL ,
[OfficeIMGPath] [varchar] (100) NOT NULL ,
[RegionID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[OfficeTourURL] [varchar] (255) NULL ,
[GeoAreaID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[CreateDT] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[UpdateDT] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[CreateByID] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[UpdateByID] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[OfficeBrandedURL] [varchar] (255) NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[OfficeManagement] (
[OfficeID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[PersonnelID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[JobTitleID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[CreateDT] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[CreateByID] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[SeqNBR] [int] NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[OfficeMls] (
[OfficeID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[SourceID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[OfficeMlsNBR] [varchar] (20) NOT NULL ,
[CreateDT] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[UpdateDT] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[CreateByID] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[UpdateByID] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Personnel] (
[PersonnelID] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,
[PersonnelDisplayName] [varchar] (100) NOT NULL ,
[FirstNM] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[PreferredFirstNM] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[MiddleNM] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[LastNM] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[PersonalTaxID] [varchar] (9) NOT NULL ,
[HireDT] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[TermDT] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[HomePhoneNBR] [varchar] (15) NULL ,
[HomeADDR1] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[HomeADDR2] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[HomeCityNM] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[HomeStateCD] [char] (2) NOT NULL ,
[HomePostalCD] [varchar] (15) NOT NULL ,
[PersonnelLangCSV] [varchar] (500) NOT NULL ,
[PersonnelSlogan] [varchar] (500) NOT NULL ,
[BGColor] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[IsEAgent] [bit] NOT NULL ,
[IsArchAgent] [bit] NOT NULL ,
[IsOptOut] [bit] NOT NULL ,
[IsDispOnlyPrefFirstNM] [bit] NOT NULL ,
[IsHideMyListingLink] [bit] NOT NULL ,
[IsPreviewsSpecialist] [bit] NOT NULL ,
[AudioFileNM] [varchar] (100) NULL ,
[iProviderID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[DRENumber] [varchar] (10) NOT NULL ,
[AgentBrandedURL] [varchar] (255) NOT NULL ,
[CreateDT] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[UpdateDT] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[CreateByID] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[UpdateByID] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[IsDisplayAwards] [bit] NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[PersonnelMLS] (
[PersonnelID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[SourceID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[AgentMlsNBR] [varchar] (20) NOT NULL ,
[CreateDT] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[UpdateDT] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[CreateByID] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[UpdateByID] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Office] ADD
CONSTRAINT [FK_Office_OfficeProfile] FOREIGN KEY
(
[OfficeID]
) REFERENCES [dbo].[OfficeProfile] (
[OfficeID]
) NOT FOR REPLICATION
GO
alter table [dbo].[Office] nocheck constraint [FK_Office_OfficeProfile]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[OfficeManagement] ADD
CONSTRAINT [FK_OfficeManagement_LookupJobTitle] FOREIGN KEY
(
[JobTitleID]
) REFERENCES [dbo].[LookupJobTitle] (
[JobTitleID]
),
CONSTRAINT [FK_OfficeManagement_Office] FOREIGN KEY
(
[OfficeID]
) REFERENCES [dbo].[Office] (
[OfficeID]
) NOT FOR REPLICATION ,
CONSTRAINT [FK_OfficeManagement_Personnel] FOREIGN KEY
(
[PersonnelID]
) REFERENCES [dbo].[Personnel] (
[PersonnelID]
) ON DELETE CASCADE
GO
alter table [dbo].[OfficeManagement] nocheck constraint [FK_OfficeManagement_Office]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[OfficeMls] ADD
CONSTRAINT [FK_OfficeMls_Office] FOREIGN KEY
(
[OfficeID]
) REFERENCES [dbo].[Office] (
[OfficeID]
) NOT FOR REPLICATION
GO
alter table [dbo].[OfficeMls] nocheck constraint [FK_OfficeMls_Office]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PersonnelMLS] ADD
CONSTRAINT [FK_PersonnelMLS_Personnel] FOREIGN KEY
(
[PersonnelID]
) REFERENCES [dbo].[Personnel] (
[PersonnelID]
) NOT FOR REPLICATION
GO
alter table [dbo].[PersonnelMLS] nocheck constraint [FK_PersonnelMLS_Personnel]
GO
Here's the query I'm having trouble with:
SELECT distinct Personnel.PersonnelID,
Personnel.FirstNM,
Personnel.LastNM,
Office.OfficeNM,
Office.OfficeID,
OfficeMls.SourceID AS OfficeBoard,
PersonnelMLS.SourceID AS AgentBoard
FROM Personnel INNER JOIN
OfficeManagement ON
Personnel.PersonnelID = OfficeManagement.PersonnelID
INNER JOIN
Office ON OfficeManagement.OfficeID = Office.OfficeID
INNER JOIN
OfficeMls ON Office.OfficeID = OfficeMls.OfficeID
INNER JOIN
PersonnelMLS ON Personnel.PersonnelID = PersonnelMLS.PersonnelID
where officemls.sourceid <> personnelmls.sourceid
and office.officenm not like ('%admin%')
group by PersonnelMLS.SourceID,
Personnel.PersonnelID,
Personnel.FirstNM,
Personnel.LastNM,
Office.OfficeNM,
Office.OfficeID,
OfficeMls.SourceID
order by office.officenm
What I'm trying to retrieve are those agents who have source id's that are not in the Office's domain of valid source id's. Here's a small portion of the results:
PersonnelID FirstNM LastNM OfficeNM OfficeID OfficeBoard AgentBoard
----------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
18205 Margaret Peggy Quattro Aventura North 650 906 908
18205 Margaret Peggy Quattro Aventura North 650 918 908
15503 Susan Jordan Blackburn Point 889 920 909
15503 Susan Jordan Blackburn Point 889 921 909
15503 Susan Jordan Blackburn Point 889 921 920
15279 Sandra Humphrey Boca Beach North 890 917 906
15279 Sandra Humphrey Boca Beach North 890 906 917
15279 Sandra Humphrey Boca Beaches 626 917 906
15279 Sandra Humphrey Boca Beaches 626 906 917
13532 Michael Demcho Boca Downtown 735 906 917
14133 Maria Ford Boca Downtown 735 906 917
19126 Michael Silverman Boca Glades Road 736 917 906
18920 Beth Schwartz Boca Glades Road 736 906 917
If you take a look at Sandra Humphries, you'll see she's out of office 626. Office 626 is associated with source id's 907 and 916. Sandra Humphries is also associated with those two source id's , but she shows up in the results.
I know this was AWFULLY long winded, but just wanted to make sure made myself as clear as possible.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Hi All,
I need to eliminate Duplicates in my Sql Query, tried to use distinct and that doesn't seem to work, can anybody pls.help.
duplicates are in #ddtempC table, and am writing a query to get a country name from the hash table where hash table has duplicates
hash table contains (THEATER_CODE, COUNTRY_CODE, COUNTRY_NAME).
and trying to write condition on THEATER_CODE and COUNTRY_CODE to get Country_name
and THEATER_CODE AND COUNTRY_CODE HAS DUPLICATES. whenever i do a sub query i get the below error.
Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
SELECT USER_FIRSTNAME, USER_LASTNAME,
user_countryCode,
USER_COUNTRY = (SELECT DISTINCT RTRIM(LTRIM(COUNTRY_NAME)) FROM #ddtempC WHERE RTRIM(LTRIM(COUNTRY_CODE)) = USER_COUNTRYCODE AND RTRIM(LTRIM(THEATER_CODE)) = USER_THEATERCODE)
FROM [user]
WHERE USER_USERNAME IS NOT NULL AND User_CreationDate BETWEEN '1/2/2007' AND '4/11/2008'
ORDER BY User_TheaterCode;
Thanks in Advance.
WITH cte_OrderProjectType AS
(
select Orderid, min(TypeID) , min(CTType) , MIN(Area)
from tableA A inner join
tableB B ON A.PID = B.PID left join
tableC C ON C.TypeID = B.TypeID LEFT JOIN
tableD D ON D.AreaID = B.ID
group by A.orderid
)
This query uses min to eliminate duplicates. It takes 1.30 seconds to complete..
Is there any way I can improve the query performance ?
We are trying to do some utilization calculations that need to factor in a given number of holiday hours per month.
I have a date dimension table (dimdate). Has a row for every day of every year (2006-2015)
I have a work entry fact table (timedetail). Has a row for every work entry. Each row has a worked date, and this column has a relationship to dimdate.
Our holidays fluctuate, and we offer floating holidays that our staff get to pick. So we cannot hard code which individual dates in dimdate as holidays. So what we have done is added a column to our dimdate table called HolidayHoursPerMonth.
This column will list the number of holiday hours available in the given month that the individual date happens to fall within, thus there are a lot of duplicates. Below is a brief example of dimdate. In the example below, there are 0 holiday hours for the month of June, and their are 8 holiday hours for the month of July.
DateKey MonthNumber HolidayHoursPerMonth
6/29/2015 6 0
6/30/2015 6 0
7/1/2015 7 8
7/2/2015 7 8
I have a pivot table create based of the fact table. I then have various date slicers from the dimension table (i.e. year, month). If I simply drag this column into the pivot table and summarize by MAX it works when you are sliced on a single month, but breaks if anything but a single month is sliced on.
I am trying to create a measure that calculates the amount of holiday hours based on the what's sliced, but only using a single value for each month. For example July should just be 8, not 8 x #of days in the month.
Listed below is how many hours per month. So if you were to slice on an entire year, the measure should equal 64. If you sliced on Jan, Feb and March, the measure should equal 12. If you were to slice nothing, thus including all 15 years in our dimdate table, the measure should equal 640 (10 years x 64 hours per year).
MonthNumberOfYear HolidayHoursPerMonth
1 8
2 4
3 0
4 0
5 8
6 0
7 8
8 0
9 8
10 4
11 16
12 8
This should be trivial but I'm ignorant so I'm hoping someone can assist. I can find lots of code snippets for removing duplicates, but I can't find a variation that works for my case.
Overview: I'm doing a name look-up, combining first & last names and if it matches against an employee table, getting the employeeID for that person. I need to only return the unique matches, and exclude any names that happen more than once in the employee table.
I have 3 possible results from my select (snippet below):
1) Single match
2) No match
3) Multiple matches (2 or more people, same first and last name)
My simple code below does exactly what I need for case 1 & 2. If there is a single match on the name, it's returns the res_ID and emp_ID as expected, if no match, no record and that works for me.
The problem I can't solve is if there are two John Smith employees, both records are returned, which is what my query requests, but not what I need. I want ONLY return data which has ONE exclusive match, and exclude all others.
Code for case 1 & 2, doesn't handle 3rd case:
Select distinct ot.res_ID, e.emp_ID
From employee e, @OutputTable ot
Where (e.fName + ' ' + e.lName) = ot.empFullNameText
Employee table has first & list names, plus emp_ID
@OutputTable is a table variable from my proc which has "John Smith" type text names as one string.
This has to be simple, but I'm over my head on this one. All ideas, reference links or other assistance appreciated.
Hi
I need a result of 1/3 as 0.3333 but select 1/3 as test
returns zero!! could you tell me how I can calculate inverse of a number and return as decimal?
Thanks in advance
I have two tables
first table name is table_VR and it has one column named CsNo and following values
table_VR
CsNo
1
2
3
second table is table_VS and it has also one column named CsNo and following values
CsNo
1
2
7
Now i want follow result
Select CsNo from table_VR where CsNo does not match with CsNo of Table_VS
result would be following
CsNo
3
so you saw in table_VR first two records matches in table_VS but the thirst row value does not match.I am not understanding what would be the query to get this result.
I have a table with 22 million Business records. I can see that there are duplicates when I group by BusinessName and Address and Phone. I'd like to place only the duplicates into a table, with a ranking, oldest business key gets a ranking of 1.
As a bonus I'd like each group to have a distinct group name (although not necessary, just want to know how to do this)
Later after I run more verifications to make sure these are not referenced elsewhere I'll delete everything with a matchRank > 1 out of the main Business table.
DROP TABLE [dbo].[TestBusiness];
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[TestBusiness](
[Business_pk] INT IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[BusinessName] VARCHAR (200) NOT NULL,
[Address] VARCHAR(MAX) NOT NULL,
[code]....
Is there a query or a way to convert duplicates value in a column to non duplicates.
View 14 Replies View RelatedHi,
I have a table with four columns. like id,lastname,
firstname,acctname. I have duplicate values for the three columns other
than id column. like
ID FirstNameLastname Acctname
1 john hopkins jh
2 john hopkins Jh
3 david webb dw
4 david webb dw
5 david webb dw
6 Dan Kennedy DK
I want to eliminate the duplicate rows. id can be any one of them.
Can any one suggest me with a query by which i can do this.
Thanks in advance
Mohan
How do I eliminate others from viewing one of the 2 databases on our production server???Is there any security not to allow all users to including sa and developers not to access one of the 2 databases on our server..
The other of the 2 databases can be accessed....
Please advise
Newbie
Hey There.
I'm in the process of doing a major data clean up and I'm just wondering how I would go about eliminating some redundant data.
The Table Layout
Contracts
CNTRID CONTRACTNUM STARTDATE CUSTOMNUM
=======================================================
0 1234567 091885 A
1 1234567 091885 A
2 1111111 111111 B
3 1234567 081205 A
Equipment
EQUIPID DEVICENAME CNTRID CUSTOMNUM
=======================================================
0 DEVICE1 0 A
1 DEVICE2 2 B
2 DEVICE3 1 A
3 DEVICE4 3 A
You will notice that each customer may have multiple devices. Each device may be tied to a contract, and each contract may have one or more devices tied to it.
In the example above, you will notice in the contracts table the contracts with the IDs 0 and 1.
Fig 1.
CNTRID CONTRACTNUM STARTDATE CUSTOMNUM
=======================================================
0 1234567 091885 A
1 1234567 091885 A
These contracts have the exact same information.
Furthermore, if you look down the table you will notice the contract with the ID 3.
Fig 2.
CNTRID CONTRACTNUM STARTDATE CUSTOMNUM
=======================================================
3 1234567 081205 A
This contract shares the same contract and customer number, but has a different start date.
Now lets take a look devices in the equipment table that refer to these records.
EQUIPID DEVICENAME CNTRID CUSTOMNUM
=======================================================
0 DEVICE1 0 A
2 DEVICE3 1 A
3 DEVICE4 3 A
You will notice that DEVICE1 and DEVICE 3 refer to the contract records that contain identical data. (As shown in 'Fig 1')
My question is as follows:
How do I eliminate the any duplicate records from the contracts table, and update the records in the equipment table with id of the left over contract.
Results Should be as follows:
Contracts
CNTRID CONTRACTNUM STARTDATE CUSTOMNUM
=======================================================
0 1234567 091885 A
2 1111111 111111 B
3 1234567 081205 A
Equipment
EQUIPID DEVICENAME CNTRID CUSTOMNUM
=======================================================
0 DEVICE1 0 A
1 DEVICE2 2 B
2 DEVICE3 0 A
3 DEVICE4 3 A
Any help you may provide would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks
--mike
I have a SQL statement with two left outer joins which connects 3 tables. Vendors, Tracking & Activity. For whatever reason, even though each is a one-to-many relationship, I am able to join 2 tables (from Vendors to Tracking) without an issue. when I then join Activity, I get a Cartesian product.I suspected that 'DISTINCT'.
SELECT DISTINCT CASE
WHEN `vendor`.`companyname` IS NULL then 'No Company Assigned'
ELSE `vendor`.`companyname`
END AS companyNameSQL, `tracking`.`pkgTracking`, CASE
[code]....
Need to eliminate certain records from my query. The below is a simple query to illustrate my problem
My Query
Select RequestNo,Event_type from Event_log where Event_type in (10,20)
Data
RequestNo Event_type
123456 10
123457 10
123457 20
123458 10
123459 10
123459 20
This above query returns all requests that meets atleast one criteria. How do i edit my query such that i get requests that meet both criteria and the result set looks like below
Data
RequestNo Event_type
123457 10
123457 20
123459 10
123459 20
edit: this came out longer than I thought, any comments about anythinghere is greatly appreciated. thank you for readingMy system stores millions of records, each with fields like firstname,lastname, email address, city, state, zip, along with any number of userdefined fields. The application allows users to define message templateswith variables. They can then select a template, and for each variablein the template, type in a value or select a field.The system allows you to query for messages you've sent by specifyingcriteria for the variables (not the fields).This requirement has made it difficult to normalize my datamodel at allfor speed. What I have is this:[fieldindex]id int PKname nvarchartype datatype[recordindex]id int PK....[recordvalues]recordid int PKfieldid int PKvalue nvarcharwhenever messages are sent, I store which fields were mapped to whatvariables for that deployment. So the query with a variable criterialooks like this:select coalesce(vm.value, rv.value)from sentmessages sminner join variablemapping vm on vm.deploymentid=sm.deploymentidleft outer join recordvalues rv onrv.recordid=sm.recordid and rv.fieldid=vm.fieldidwhere coalesce(vm.value, rv.value) ....this model works pretty well for searching messages with variablecriteria and looking up variable values for a particular message. thebig problem I have is that the recordvalues table is HUGE, 1 millionrecords with 50 fields each = 50 million recordvalues rows. The value,two int columns plus the two indexes I have on the table make it into abeast. Importing data takes forever. Querying the records (with a fieldcriteria) also takes longer than it should.makes sense, the performance was largely IO bound.I decided to try and cut into that IO. looking at a recordvalues tablewith over 100 million rows in it, there were only about 3 million uniquevalues. so I split the recordvalues table into two tables:[recordvalues]recordid int PKfieldid int PKvalueid int[valueindex]id int PKvalue nvarchar (unique)now, valueindex holds 3 million unique values and recordvaluesreferences them by id. to my suprise this shaved only 500mb off a 4gbdatabase!importing didn't get any faster either, although it's no longer IO boundit appears the cpu as the new bottleneck outweighed the IO bottleneck.this is probably because I haven't optimized the queries for the newtables (was hoping it wouldn't be so hard w/o the IO problem).is there a better way to accomplish what I'm trying to do? (eliminatethe redundant data).. does SQL have built-in constructs to do stuff likethis? It seems like maybe I'm trying to duplicate functionality at ahigh level that may already exist at a lower level.IO is becoming a serious bottleneck.the million record 50 field csv file is only 500mb. I would've thoughtthat after eliminating all the redundant first name, city, last name,etc it would be less data and not 8x more!-GordonPosted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services----------------------------------------------------------** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **----------------------------------------------------------http://www.usenet.com
View 5 Replies View RelatedBeing one step removed from innumerate, I was wondering whether there was a more elegant way to avoid divide by zero error instead of trudging through a bunch of isnulls.
My intuition tells me that since multiplication looks like repeated addition, that maybe division is repeated subtraction?
If that's true is there a way to finesse divide by zero errors by somehow reframing the statement as multiplication instead of division?
The sql statement that is eating my kishkas is
cast(1.0*(
(ISNULL(a.DNT,0)+ISNULL(a.rex,0)+ISNULL(a.med,0))-(ISNULL(b.dnt,0)+ISNULL(b.rex,0)+ISNULL(b.med,0))/
ISNULL(a.DNT,0)+ISNULL(a.rex,0)+ISNULL(a.med,0)) as decimal(10,4)) TotalLossRatio
Is there a way to nucleate the error by restating the division? My assertion underlying this statement is that the a alias represents a premium paid, so between medical, pharmacy and dental, there MUST BE at least one premium paid, otherwise you wouldn't be here. the b alias is losses, so likewise, between medical, pharmacy and dental, there MUST BE at least one loss (actually, it just occurred to me that maybe there are no losses, but that would be inconceivable, but ill check again)) so that's when it struck me that maybe there's a different way to ask the question that obviates the need to do it by division.
I am querying several tables and piping the output to an Excel spreadsheet.
Several (not all) columns contain repeating data that I'd prefer not to include on the output. I only want the first row in the set to have that data. Is there a way in the query to do this under SQL 2005?
As an example, my query results are as follows (soory if it does not show correctly):
OWNERBARN ROUTE DESCVEHDIST CASE
BARBAR TRACKING #70328VEH 32832869.941393
BARBAR TRACKING #70328VEH 32832869.941393
BARBAR TRACKING #70328VEH 32832869.941393
DAXDAX TRACKING #9398VEH 39839834.942471
DAXDAX TRACKING #9398VEH 39839834.942471
DAXDAX TRACKING #9398VEH 39839834.942471
TAXTAX TRACKING #2407 40754.391002
TAXTAX TRACKING #2407 40754.391002
TAXTAX TRACKING #2407 40754.391002
I only want the output to be:
OWNERBARN ROUTE DESCVEHDIST CASE
BARBAR TRACKING #70328VEH 32832869.941393
DAXDAX TRACKING #9398VEH 39839834.942471
TAXTAX TRACKING #2407 40754.391002
Thanks,
Walt
I am new to sql server and I am having deficulties writing sql script to perform the following:
1) Merging data from two tables A and B
2) Eliminate duplicate present in table B (Conditions to satisfy for dublicate:If similar address is found in both tables AND class type in Table A =1
3) merge data related to dup(eliminated records) to new table.
Not sure if we can eliminate records first before merging two tables. Tables are as follow:
Table A
Fields: ID, NAME, Address, city, zip, Class type
Value:123, John, 123 Main, NY, 71690,1
Value:124, Tom, 100 State, LA, 91070,0
Table B
Field: ID, NAME, Address, city, zip, Class Type
Value:200, Tim, 123 Main, NY, 71690,0 (duplicate; satisfied both conditions and left out in final table)
Value:124, Jack, 100 State, LA, 91070,0 (same condition but second condition is not met)
Value:320,Bob, 344 coast hwy, slc, 807760,0
Final Table:
Field: ID, NAME, Address, city, zip, Class Type
Value:123, John, 123 Main, NY, 71690,1 (should also show t
Value:124, Tom, 100 State, LA, 91070,0
Value:124, Jack, 100 State, LA, 91070,0
Value:320,Bob, 344 coast hwy, slc, 807760,0
Table d:(relate to table A:showing all products that are related to table A)
table_A.ID, Products
123, Paper 1
123, paper 2
Table e:(relate to table B: showing all products that are related to table B)
table_B.ID, Products
200, Paper 3
Final Table:
ID, Product
123, Paper 1
123, Paper 2
123, Paper 3 (changing table b id to table a)
Would appreciate any help writing script to perform such transformation. Thanks
Hello,
I'm trying to eliminate the duplicate 'URL' rows in the query:
SELECT
ni.[Id],
ni.[Abstract],
ni.[MostPopular],
ni.[URL]
FROM dbo.[NewsCategory] nc WITH (READUNCOMMITTED)
INNER JOIN dbo.[NewsItem] ni WITH (READUNCOMMITTED)
ON nc.[Id] = ni.NewsCategoryId
WHERE
--nc.[ProviderId] = @ProviderId
--AND
ni.[URL] in (
select DISTINCT URL
from dbo.NewsItem
where mostpopular = 1
-- OR mostemailed = 1
)
ORDER BY ni.[DateStamp] DESC
If you look at this line in the query :
select DISTINCT URL
from dbo.NewsItem
where mostpopular = 1
IF i run this query alone it will return 8 unique rows. I expect that the SELECT IN statemnet would help return a distinct set but it doesn't. This entire query returns like 20 rows with duplicate rows.
The reason why I can't do a distinct in the first set of columns is because the column ni.[Abstract] is TEXT and it says that data type is NOT COMPARABLE.
Thanks so much.
Hi i have a table value which contains
value
-----
a
a
a
b
b
b
c
c
c
Now i need to have the results as
a 1
b 1
c 1
I tried using distinct.But OLEDB returns error that invalid syntax.It doesn't support distinct keyword.Actually i read these table from a file thru OLEDB.Not from a database.Any idea ? Thanks in Advance
Suppose I have users that can belong to organizations. Organizationsare arranged in a tree. Each organization has only one parentorganization but a user maybe a member of multiple organizations.The problem that I'm facing that both organizations and individualusers may have relationships with other entities which aresemantically the same. For instance, an individual user can purchasethings and so can an organization. An individual user can havebusiness partners and so can an organization. So it seems that I wouldneed to have a duplicate set of link tables that link a user to apurchase and then a parallel link table linking an organization to apurchase. If I have N entities with which both users and organizationsmay have relationships then I need 2*N link tables. There is nothingwrong with that per se but just not elegant to have two differenttables for a relationship which is the same in nature, e.g.purchaser->purchaseditem.One other approach I was thinking of is to create an intermediateentity (say it's called "holder") that will be used to hold referencesto all the relationships that both an organization and an individualmay have. There will be 2 link tables linking organizations to"holder" and users to "holder". Holder will in turn reference thepurchases, partners and so on. In this case the number of link tableswill be N+2 as opposed to 2*N but it will have a performance cost ofan extra join.Is there a better way of modelling this notion of 2 different entitiesthat can possess similar relationships with N other entities?
View 28 Replies View RelatedI have an UPDATE statement that joins two table by SendId. One table, I'll call it T1, has a clustered index on SendId ASC. The other table I will call T2 also has a clustered index on SendID ASC. All the columns from T2 are used to update T1. The execution plan shows a Clustered index scan on T2 and a Clustered Index Seek on T1 going into a Nested Loops inner join. Immediately following is a Distinct Sort that is done on SendId ASC. Why the Distinct SORT if the tables are already ordered by SendID?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI'm using SQL 2012 express.. and just recently learned how to code.
I wrote a query and keep receiving this error...
Error converting data type varchar to float.
here's the query code
SELECT SUM(cast(lc as float))
FROM [dbo].[LaborCosts]
WHERE ppty = 'ga'
AND PL = 'allctd ktchn expns'
AND ACCT like 'payroll%'
I am trying to sum up the values in column LC, and realized I have unnecessary quotations marks. How can I eliminate the quotations from the column, and only query the numerical values?
I need to send the result of a procedure to an update statement.Basically updating the column of one table with the result of aquery in a stored procedure. It only returns one value, if it didnt Icould see why it would not work, but it only returns a count.Lets say I have a sproc like so:create proc sp_countclients@datecreated datetimeasset nocount onselect count(clientid) as countfrom clientstablewhere datecreated > @datecreatedThen, I want to update another table with that value:Declare @dc datetimeset @dc = '2003-09-30'update anothertableset ClientCount = (exec sp_countclients @dc) -- this line errorswhere id_ = @@identityOR, I could try this, but still gives me error:declare @c intset @c = exec sp_countclients @dcWhat should I do?Thanks in advance!Greg
View 4 Replies View Related
I have an Execute SQL Task that executes "select count(*) as Row_Count from xyztable" from an Oracle Server. I'm trying to assign the result to a variable. However when I try to execute I get an error:
[Execute SQL Task] Error: An error occurred while assigning a value to variable "RowCount": "Unsupported data type on result set binding Row_Count.".
Which data type should I use for the variable, RowCount? I've tried Int16, Int32, Int64.
Thanks!
Hi all,
I copied the following code from Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Online (September 2007):
UDF_table.sql:
USE AdventureWorks;
GO
IF OBJECT_ID(N'dbo.ufnGetContactInformation', N'TF') IS NOT NULL
DROP FUNCTION dbo.ufnGetContactInformation;
GO
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.ufnGetContactInformation(@ContactID int)
RETURNS @retContactInformation TABLE
(
-- Columns returned by the function
ContactID int PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
FirstName nvarchar(50) NULL,
LastName nvarchar(50) NULL,
JobTitle nvarchar(50) NULL,
ContactType nvarchar(50) NULL
)
AS
-- Returns the first name, last name, job title, and contact type for the specified contact.
BEGIN
DECLARE
@FirstName nvarchar(50),
@LastName nvarchar(50),
@JobTitle nvarchar(50),
@ContactType nvarchar(50);
-- Get common contact information
SELECT
@ContactID = ContactID,
@FirstName = FirstName,
@LastName = LastName
FROM Person.Contact
WHERE ContactID = @ContactID;
SELECT @JobTitle =
CASE
-- Check for employee
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT * FROM HumanResources.Employee e
WHERE e.ContactID = @ContactID)
THEN (SELECT Title
FROM HumanResources.Employee
WHERE ContactID = @ContactID)
-- Check for vendor
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT * FROM Purchasing.VendorContact vc
INNER JOIN Person.ContactType ct
ON vc.ContactTypeID = ct.ContactTypeID
WHERE vc.ContactID = @ContactID)
THEN (SELECT ct.Name
FROM Purchasing.VendorContact vc
INNER JOIN Person.ContactType ct
ON vc.ContactTypeID = ct.ContactTypeID
WHERE vc.ContactID = @ContactID)
-- Check for store
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT * FROM Sales.StoreContact sc
INNER JOIN Person.ContactType ct
ON sc.ContactTypeID = ct.ContactTypeID
WHERE sc.ContactID = @ContactID)
THEN (SELECT ct.Name
FROM Sales.StoreContact sc
INNER JOIN Person.ContactType ct
ON sc.ContactTypeID = ct.ContactTypeID
WHERE ContactID = @ContactID)
ELSE NULL
END;
SET @ContactType =
CASE
-- Check for employee
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT * FROM HumanResources.Employee e
WHERE e.ContactID = @ContactID)
THEN 'Employee'
-- Check for vendor
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT * FROM Purchasing.VendorContact vc
INNER JOIN Person.ContactType ct
ON vc.ContactTypeID = ct.ContactTypeID
WHERE vc.ContactID = @ContactID)
THEN 'Vendor Contact'
-- Check for store
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT * FROM Sales.StoreContact sc
INNER JOIN Person.ContactType ct
ON sc.ContactTypeID = ct.ContactTypeID
WHERE sc.ContactID = @ContactID)
THEN 'Store Contact'
-- Check for individual consumer
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT * FROM Sales.Individual i
WHERE i.ContactID = @ContactID)
THEN 'Consumer'
END;
-- Return the information to the caller
IF @ContactID IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
INSERT @retContactInformation
SELECT @ContactID, @FirstName, @LastName, @JobTitle, @ContactType;
END;
RETURN;
END;
GO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I executed it in my SQL Server Management Studio Express and I got: Commands completed successfully. I do not know where the result is and how to get the result viewed. Please help and advise.
Thanks in advance,
Scott Chang
HI,
I ran a select * from customers where state ='va', this is the result...
(29 row(s) affected)
The following file has been saved successfully:
C:outputcustomers.rpt 10826 bytes
I choose Query select to a file
then when I tried to open the customer.rpt from the c drive I got this error message. I am not sure why this happend
invalid TLV record
Thanks for your help
Ali
As the topic suggests I need the end results to show a list of shows and their dates ordered by date DESC.
Tables I have are structured as follows:
SHOWS
showID
showTitle
SHOWACCESS
showID
remoteID
VIDEOS
videoDate
showID
SQL is as follows:
SELECT shows.showID AS showID, shows.showTitle AS showTitle,
(SELECT MAX(videos.videoFilmDate) AS vidDate FROM videos WHERE videos.showID = shows.showID)
FROM shows, showAccess
WHERE shows.showID = showAccess.showID
AND showAccess.remoteID=21
ORDER BY vidDate DESC;
I had it ordering by showTitle and it worked fine, but I need it to order by vidDate.
Can anyone shed some light on where I am going wrong?
thanks
I am trying to code a WHERE xxxx IN ('aaa','bbb','ccc') requirement but it the return values for the IN keyword changes according to another column, thus the need for a CASE function.
WHERE GROUP.GROUP_ID = 2 AND DEPT.DEPT_ID = 'D' AND WORK_TYPE_ID IN ( CASE DEPT_ID WHEN 'D' THEN 'A','B','C' <---- ERROR WHEN 'F' THEN 'C','D ELSE 'A','B','C','D' END )
I kept on getting errors, like
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 44Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'WHERE'.
which leads me to assume that the CASE ... WHEN ... THEN statement does not allow mutiple values for result expression. Is there a way to get the SQL above to work or code the same logic in a different manner in just one simple SQL, and not a procedure or T-SQL script.
I'm using a subquery to return a delivery charge line as a column in the result set. I want to see this delivery charge only on the first line of the results for each contract. Code and results are below.
declare @start smalldatetime
declare @end smalldatetime
set @start = '2015-03-22 00:00' -- this should be a Sunday
set @end = '2015-03-28 23:59' -- this should be the following Saturday
select di.dticket [Contract], di.ddate [Delivered], di.item [Fleet_No], di.descr [Description], dd.min_chg [Delivery_Chg], dd.last_invc_date [Delivery_Invoiced],
[code]....
In this example, I only want to see the delivery charge of 125.00 for the first line of contract HU004377. For simplicity I have only shown the lines for 1 contract here, but there would normally be many different contracts with varying numbers of lines, and I only want to see the delivery charge once for each contract.
help strange result whan i do this
Code Snippet
SELECT unit_date, unit, ISNULL(NULLIF ((unit + DATEDIFF(mm, GETDATE(), unit_date)) % 4, 0), 4) AS new_unit
FROM dbo.empList
i try to get next unit value to next month
why i get this -1
on date
01/01/2008
1
-1
unit_date unit new_unit
01/02/2008
2
1
01/02/2008
1
4
01/01/2008
1
-1
01/02/2008
1
4
21/01/2008
1
-1
21/01/2008
1
-1
01/02/2008
1
4
TNX
I need some help.
I have created a database that looks like the following:
FirstName Table link to Main Table.
I have created a Stored procedure that looks like this:
Create procedure dbo.StoredProcedure
(
@FirstName varchar(20)
)
Declare FirstNameID int
Insert Into Main Table
(
FirstName
)
Values
(
@FirstName
)
Select @FirstNameID = Scope_Identity()
How could I redesign this to check if a value exists and if it exists then simply use that value instead of creating a new duplicate value?
Thanks!!