Transact SQL :: Case In Where Clause With Column Comparison With Greater Than Or No Filter

Sep 24, 2015

For Below example when @x=1 to retrieve col>0 rows or all rows.

With out another if else blocks or Dynamic sql to solve only in where clause.

select 0 col into #x
union
select 1 col
union
select 2 col

declare @x INT =1
SELECT * FROM #x
where col>CASE WHEN @x=1 THEN 0 ELSE (col=col) END

--here in case i want to compare only when @x=1 then col>0 other wise select all rows with out filter

View 5 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Transact SQL :: CASE Expression In WHERE Clause?

Nov 6, 2015

I have a scenario where the End User is going to select two parameters.  @AgentID and @Location If the End User selects @AgentID parameter, in my WHERE clause, I do not want to check the location condition. By default, the agent knows their location already.

If the End User select @Location parameter, in my WHERE clause, I still want to check the Agent condition.

@AgentID parameter would populate either with "All" or their actual agent# (76754 for example).

@Location parameter would populate either with "All" or their actual location (Birmingham or Bessemer for example)Sample of my current WHERE clause:

WHERE
 
 gl.ReceiptDate >= @BeginDate and gl.ReceiptDate < DATEADD(D,1,@EndDate)
 AND gl.AgentId = CASE WHEN @AgentID = 'All' THEN gl.AgentID ELSE @AgentID END
 AND gl.Location = @Location

View 9 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Column Update With Comparison With Another Table

Nov 10, 2015

I upload data from a Txt File(Txt_Temp) where I have VinNumber with 6 digits. Another table name Resrve_Temp1 where I have Vinumber with 17 digit. Now I need to update the vinnumber 6 digit to 17 digit or to new column in Txt_temp.

Txt_Temp - Table

I tried this code with no succes and only one row is updating

update Txt_Temp Set Txt_Temp.Vinnumber=dbo.R_ResrvStock.Vin
from dbo.R_ResrvStock inner join Txt_Temp on Right (dbo.R_ResrvStock.Vin,6)=Txt_Temp.VinNumber

OR Add this code in view 

Select dbo.R_ResrvStock.Vin,R_Txt_Temp.Vinnumber,R_Txt_Te mp.Model_Code 
from dbo.R_ResrvStock inner join R_Txt_Temp on Right (dbo.R_ResrvStock.Vin,6)=R_Txt_Temp.VinNumber

Vin
123456
123123
123789

Resrve_Temp1 - Table
asddfghjklk123654
asddfghjklk123456
asddfghjklk321564
asddfghjklk123123
asddfghjklk123789
asddfghjklk654655
asddfghjklk456465

My Result can be in Txt_Temp table or new table or with one or two columns

asddfghjklk123456 123456
asddfghjklk123123 123123
asddfghjklk123789 123789

View 10 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Case Statement In Update Clause

Jun 4, 2015

I have used the below update query. However, its updating only the first value. Like its updating AB with volume when c.Type  = ABC, similarly for CD. Its not updating based on the 2nd or the next case condition.
 
Update XYZ Set AB = a.Amt * (CASE WHEN c.Type = 'ABC'  THEN  (c.volume)
 WHEN c.TYPE = 'DEF'  THEN  (c.volume)
 WHEN c.Type = 'GHI'  THEN  (c.volume)
 Else 0
 END),
 CD = CASE WHEN c.Type = 'MARGIN' THEN '4105.31'
 WHEN c.Type = 'ABC' THEN '123.1'
 WHEN c.Type = 'DEF' THEN '234.2'
WHEN c.Type = 'GHI' THEN '567.1'
END
 from table1 a join table2 b
 on a.Cust = b.Customer
 join table3 c
 on b.account = c.account and b.channel =c.channel

Why its not working properly? But if i use Select statement instead of update query its working properly.

View 18 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Finding Syntax To Combine IN And CASE In A WHERE Clause?

Oct 29, 2015

I cannot seem to find the syntax to combine IN + CASE in a WHERE clause

WHERE
ses.BK_MS_SESSION <= '2015-03'
AND vis.CAT_DRAW_STATUS =
(CASE ses.BK_MS_SESSION
WHEN '2015-03' THEN vis.CAT_DRAW_STATUS
ELSE
CASE stat.BK_MS_VISIT_STATUS
WHEN 'T' THEN 'X'
ELSE vis.CAT_DRAW_STATUS
END
END
) IN ('D','R')

View 7 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Case Statement In Where Clause - Select First / Default Value If Two Different Value Exists

Nov 16, 2015

I have scenario where i have to pick one particular value from where condition. Here is the example:A store can have different types i-e A or B , A and B or either A or B.

Store     Type    Sales
11           A        1000
23       A      1980
23       B       50
5         B      560

I want to filter the store in "where clause"  where

1)- if the store has type A and  B, then assign only A
2)- if the store has  type A associated with it then assign A
3)- if the store has type B associated with it, then assign B.

Select Store, sum(sales), Type
from table1
where (TYPE]=  (case when [TYPE] in ('A','B') then 'A'
when [TYPE]='A' then 'A' else 'B'end))
GROUP BY [store], [TYPE]

The above statement is not working for when store has only Type B associated with it.

View 7 Replies View Related

Using Greater Than '&>' In SELECT Clause

Jan 10, 2006

Here is the first part of a query for MySQL that I am trying to get working on MSSQL:


Code:


SELECT n.*,
round((n.rgt-n.lft-1)/2,0) AS childs,
count(*)+(n.lft>1) AS level,
((min(p.rgt)-n.rgt-(n.lft>1))/2) > 0 AS lower,
(( (n.lft-max(p.lft)>1) )) AS upper
FROM table n
...



But, I get this error message:

Server: Msg 170, Level 15, State 1, Line 3
Line 3: Incorrect syntax near '>'.

Is there a way to convert this? Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

T-SQL (SS2K8) :: Where Clause Integer Greater Than

Jul 21, 2014

When I use the following SQL with the variable @CutOFFTID the second select statement query takes several minutes. If i run it replacing the value in the where clause with the acutal value of the variable it runs instantly.

DECLARE @CutOffTid int
SELECT @CutOffTid = isnull(max(ccas_id),0)
FROMdbo.fbs_trans (NOLOCK)
print 'Cut Off ID is ' + cast(@CutOffTid as char)

DECLARE @MinPeriod int
SELECT @MinPeriod = Min(period)
FROM agr.dbo.atrans
WHERE agrtid >@CutOffTid

View 9 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Match Column Value In Where Clause

Jun 4, 2015

I have a table Customer with column name "SerNo" the value of SerNo column is like below.

Circle Graphics-a48712c1-2769-4964-ab89-4c1fb2949cf3
Circle Graphics-a48712c1-2769-4964-ab89-4c1fb2949cf3
Circle Graphics-a48712c1-2769-4964-ab89-4c1fb2949cf3
Metz-2d9c957d-ca1c-4b27-adf8-39fef552f3f7
Metz-2d9c957d-ca1c-4b27-adf8-39fef552f3f7
Circle Graphics-a48712c1-2769-4964-ab89-4c1fb2949cf3

[code]...

I want to join it with nother table "Order" which has a SerNo column but does not have first part of SerNo.

SerNo.
9ad88929-f32d-459e-96c4-8d6c3d61e9d9
0a1d8b8f-7f5f-4a01-8e63-64579213afef
9342f8d7-dfdd-4535-8f01-5301bde669aa

[code]...

So basically i want to join these two tables and ignore the first part before "-" from SerNo column in customer table.

View 5 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Defaulting A Column To Be Upper Case

Aug 11, 2015

While creating a table, can we default a column to be UPPER. So that even if we insert a lower case, it should be converted to UPPER case.

View 4 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: How To Set Case Sensitivity Of A Column In Design Time

Aug 3, 2015

With Sql Server Management Studio, while creating/modifying a table I want to specify one of its columns to store values in lower case only. Can it be done through the designer or by some other means?

N.B.: Using SQL Server 2005.

View 22 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Case Statement For A New Column Based On Date And Username Columns

Sep 2, 2015

Below is the SQL Query i am currently having

SELECT IG_FinancialTransactionSummary.ClaimNum,IG_FinancialTransactionSummary.TransactionCode,
IG_FinancialTransactionSummary.TransactionDate,IG_FinancialTransactionSummary.Username,
FinancialTransactionSummaryTest.ClaimNum,FinancialTransactionSummaryTest.TransactionAmount,
FinancialTransactionSummaryTest.UserName--,FinancialTransactionSummaryTest.TransactionDate

[Code] ....

And here is the result dataset

ClaimNumTransactionDateUsername ClaimNum TransactionAmountUserName
2000074 20150209jerry.witt 2000074 -10000DATAFIX INSERTED ON 20150626 AT 162152493 LOCAL
2000074 20150626DATAFIX INSERTED ON 20150626 AT 162152493 LOCAL 2000074 -10000DATAFIX INSERTED ON 20150626 AT 162152493 LOCAL

[Code] .....

So,if we look at the result set, we notice 2 conditions where the IG_FinancialTransactionSummary.Username is like 'Data' and if we see the transaction date then sometimes that is the max transaction date or sometimes there are transactions that happened after but that doesn't have like '%data%' in username . So, i need to add a new column to my sql query which should basically verify if the username is like '%data%' and if that is the max(transaction date) or even if there are any transactions after that doesn't have like '%data%' then YES else No.

View 13 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Update Statement With A Greater Than Value

Apr 21, 2015

I created  this unique  codes and

I need all [FRMDAT] field set to ‘12/31/2014’ in the MKLOPT table, where the [JOBCOD]  in the VALUE list BELOW  have a  [FRMDAT] that is currently (greater than) > ‘12/31/2014’

VALUE LIST
PH00059 
PH02775      
PH03051      
PH03305      
PH03336      
PH03342      
PH03371      
PH03992      
PH03993      
PH03994      

View 2 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Displaying POs With Due Dates Greater Than Three Days

Apr 24, 2015

What I want to see is how to show PO's who's due dates  are > three

Select * from mytable
where myorderstatus = 'onorder'

This is my duedate format and what I want is any that past that date over 3 days

2014-08-11 00:00:00.000

View 11 Replies View Related

T-SQL (SS2K8) :: Using A Date Comparison In A Case Statement?

Mar 19, 2015

I am trying to use a date comparison in a statement using the year statement as well. Here is what I have:

Case [LastHireDate]
When YEAR([LastHireDate]) < Year(@EndYearlyDate) then '12'
When Month([LastHireDate]) = '1' then '12'
When Month([LastHireDate]) = '2' then '11'
When Month([LastHireDate]) = '3' then '10'
When Month([LastHireDate]) = '4' then '9'

[Code] ....

When I am looking at it [LastHireDate] is showing that red line underneath. The < symbol has a red line and @EndYearlyDate has a red line. I can not seem to get them to clear and am, wondering what I am missing. When I execute the error comes up that it does not like the < sign in there.

Here is the full piece that the Case resides in:

Insert _Test
SELECT
EmpNo,
PersonIdNo,
REPLACE(PersonTaxIdNo,'-',''),
LastName,
FirstName,

[code]......

View 3 Replies View Related

Like Comparison Operator In An Expression To Ignore Case

Aug 31, 2007

How do you make the "Like" comparison operator ignore case in an expression??

Expression looks like this:




Code SnippetParameters!CompanyFilterOp.Value = "%",Fields!company.Value like "*" & Parameters!Company.Value & "*"





BTW, the expression above is part of a switch expression, and is at the table level.

Data contains "General Industry" in Company column from database.

User enters "indust" in Company Parameter text box, and result is no data found.

User enters "Indust" in Company Parameter text box, and data is returned.

Thanks in advance for your time in responding.

View 3 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Count To Get Distinct Phone No Greater Than 1 In A Query

Nov 11, 2015

I have a table with kind of data as below

PhNo     Address     DP    AutoID     Name
0123      RH           001    4577          J
0123      RH           004    4567           JD
0124      RH           010    4467          KK
0121       HN          007    4667         RK
012         SVN        009    4787         RKK
012         SVN        009    4787         RKR
011         SVN        009    4787         KKR

I need distinct phone numbers >1 for a address and if the same phNo has 2 different names I want to skip the second one.I want the output like below

PhNo     Address     DP    AutoID     Name
0123      RH           001    4577          J
0124      RH           010    4467          KK
0121        SVN        009    4787         RKK
012        SVN        009    4787         RKR
011         SVN        009    4787         KKR

View 3 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Split Records If Total Days Greater To 1

Nov 5, 2015

I want to split the data every employeid wise based on fromdate and todate if totaldays>1.

sample output specified below ....but same output required for allthe empid's

create table attendence(EmployeeID nvarchar(20),[From] datetime,[To] datetime,TotalDays float)
insert into attendence values('1417','2015-11-02 22:48:49.450','2015-11-04 22:48:49.450',3)
insert into attendence values('1418','2015-11-04 22:48:49.450','2015-11-04 22:48:49.450',1)
insert into attendence values('1419','2015-11-03 22:48:49.450','2015-11-04 22:48:49.450',2)
insert into attendence values('1420','2015-11-04 22:48:49.450','2015-11-05 22:48:49.450',2)
insert into attendence values('1421','2015-11-01 22:48:49.450','2015-11-04 22:48:49.450',4)

 OP
 -------------------------
 EmployeeID    [From]                          [To]                              TotalDays
 1417          2015-11-02 22:48:49.450         2015-11-02 22:48:49.450             3
 1417          2015-11-03 22:48:49.450         2015-11-03 22:48:49.450             3
 1417         2015-11-04 22:48:49.450          2015-11-04 22:48:49.450             3

View 3 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Function To Tokenize A String Of Characters Greater Than 4000

Jul 21, 2015

I'm using sys.dm_fts_parser dynamic management function to tokenize a string of characters >4000. The function doesn't accept a query_string parameter >4000 characters. Is there a way around this? I've tried to execute the SELECT defined in the function but that doesn't work.  

View 2 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Query To Return Greater Than Zero Values To Sort Up And Zeros Go Down

Sep 17, 2015

I am using a table to store different size numbers for example:

Look at the picture below:

But I want this type of output look at the picture below:

How to sort the query to return greater than zero values to sort up and zeros go down. 

I am using sql server 2008.

View 14 Replies View Related

Sort Component, Remove Duplicates, Comparison Flags - Ignore Case

Feb 29, 2008

What happens when you add the Ignore Case flag into the mix?

I'm having a hell of a time - I'm dealing with an SCD situation using TableDifference component and I have both existing dimensions and new data coming in, each go through identical Case-Insensitive/Sort with remove duplicates, but I'm getting identical new and deleted records detected - I think because of ordering issues. I'm still trying to whittle the test case down, but I think data from all around the records I'm investigating seems to get sorted in between them, so I'm having trouble getting a small test case built.

I think the mixed case data is the root of the problem, and I think the design is bad, but before I go back to the technical lead, I need to understand enough to show that you cannot take two pipelines sorted and de-duped case-insensitively and then do a case-sensitive table difference operation.

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2012 :: Case Statement On Nvarchar With Literal String Comparison To Varchar?

Apr 14, 2015

how SQL 2012 would treat a literal string for a comparison similar to below. I want to ensure that the server isn't implicitly converting the value as it runs the SQL, so I'd rather change the data type in one of my tables, as unicode isn't required.

Declare @T Table (S varchar(2))
Declare @S nvarchar(255)
Insert into @T
Values ('AR'), ('AT'), ('AW')
Set @S = 'Auto Repairs'
Select *
from @T T
where case @S when 'Auto Repairs' then 'AR'
when 'Auto Target' then 'AT'
when 'Auto Wash' then 'AW' end = T.STo summarise

in the above would AR, AT and AW in the case statement be treated as a nvarchar, as that's the field the case is wrapped around, or would it be treated as a varchar, as that's what I'm comparing it to.

View 3 Replies View Related

Where Clause Filter

Apr 14, 2008

I have an sql script that has 2 main blocks of Where filter which I'd call as Filter1 and Filter2 as follows:

Select
DisplayColumns...
From
InterestingTables
Where
(Filter1) --W1
AND --W2
NOT --W3
(Filter2) --W4

Note that Filter1 and Filter2 are composite filters (inner filters nested; it shouldn't matter as long as I have the outer parenthesis as above, right?).
Now, say SetF1ExF2 is the result set of the sql script above.
Additionally, let's say I obtain the result set SetF1 by having W2 to W4 commented out and SetF1AndF2 comes from commenting out W3.
Shouldn't the following hold: SetF1AndF2 = SetF1 - SetF1ExF2
I am having a discrepancy between the values with SetF1AndF2 < SetF1 - SetF1ExF2.

TIA.

View 1 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: How To Create UNION Clause With Two Queries That BOTH Have WHERE Clause

Nov 4, 2015

I have a quite big SQL query which would be nice to be used using UNION betweern two Select and Where clauses. I noticed that if both Select clauses have Where part between UNION other is ignored. How can I prevent this?

I found a article in StackOverflow saying that if UNION has e.g. two Selects with Where conditions other one will not work. [URL] ....

I have installed SQL Server 2014 and I tried to use tricks mentioned in StackOverflow's article but couldn't succeeded.

Any example how to write two Selects with own Where clauses and those Selects are joined with UNION?

View 13 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: String Hex Comparison And Partitioning?

Oct 22, 2015

Our dev team wants to introduce a complex key, which is made up of
 
EventDate         datetime2(5)      = ‘2015-10-22 10:19:59.12345’
ConsumerID      bigint                = 1234
SiteID               tinyint               = 15

EventDate will be converted to a bigint and then to a hex value

= 2015-10-22 10:19:59.12345 = 2015102210195912345 = 1BF714C8A0D4F699

ConsumerID will be converted to a hex value

= 1234 = 4D2

SiteID will be converted to a hex value

= 15 = F

The hex values will then be concatenated together and stored as a string (varchar). The application will handle the creation of the complex key

   = ‘1BF714C8A0D4F699-4D2-F’

I am trying to argue against this approach and get them to store the values in their native form, in separate columns as a natural key.

To make matters worse, we need to use partitioning, where the partition boundary will be on a hexed datetime2(5) at weekly intervals. I was really hoping a proof of concept would show that hex string comparison could potentially put a row under a wrong partition, but so far, on an 8 million rowset, it is working fine.

For example, in the proof of concept, right partition boundary:

= '1BF398D53DFA1800' 
(2014-12-15 00:00:00.00000)

contains rows

= '1BF3983242B9C000-1-2'
(2014-12-08 00:00:00.00000-1-2)

Through to

= '1BF398C373960580-2FAF3003-2'  
(2014-12-14 23:59:00.00000-800010243-2)

The prior partition boundary is 1

= 'BF3983242B9C000'
(2014-12-08 00:00:00.00000)
 
How is this working, given that the string lengths (varchar) are different and the row value contains dashes and the partition boundaries are smaller in length without dashes? How varchar string comparison is working here?

View 4 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Upper Case To Lower Case Conversion

May 4, 2015

I have column with value of all upper case, for example, FIELD SERVICE, is there anyway, I can convert into Field Service?

View 7 Replies View Related

ADO Case-sensitive Filter

Aug 7, 2007

Using ADO 2.7, what is the best way to perform a case-sensitive filter? I have seen on other forums where folks have said that the StrComp function can be used inside of the .Filter method, but I haven't been able to get that to work. I am using VB 6 and ADO 2.7, and have a need to perform case sensitive filters. I know I am not the ony one who has needed to do this...

As always, your time is appreciated.

View 4 Replies View Related

How To Include Variable In CURSOR SQL Filter Clause?

Jul 23, 2005

After trying every way I could come up with I can't get a filter clauseto work with a passed variable ...I have a cursor that pulls a filter string from a table (works OK),then I want to use that filter in a second cursor, but can't get thesyntax ...@bakfilter is equal to "MISV2_db_%.BAK" before I try to open and fetchfrom the second cursor. Here is the cursor declaration:DECLARE curFiles CURSOR FORSELECT FileName, FileDateFROM DataFileWHERE (((Active)=1) AND ((FileName) LIKE '@bak_filter'))ORDER BY FileDate DESCWhat do I need to do to get it to use the string contained in@bak_filter?Thanks in advance, Jim

View 1 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Compare Two Table With Multiple Date Comparison

Oct 20, 2015

I need to take all records from table @A where ID = 1. Also i need to process the records with datewise from table @A. Here is the table structure

DECLARE @A TABLE (ID INT, ACCOUNT VARCHAR(10), EFFDT DATE)
INSERT INTO @A VALUES (1,'AAA','2015-10-01')
INSERT INTO @A VALUES (1,'BBB','2015-10-01')
INSERT INTO @A VALUES (1,'CCC','2015-10-01')
INSERT INTO @A VALUES (1,'AAA','2015-10-05')
INSERT INTO @A VALUES (1,'DDD','2015-10-01')
INSERT INTO @A VALUES (2,'AAA','2015-10-02')
INSERT INTO @A VALUES (2,'BBB','2015-10-02')
INSERT INTO @A VALUES (2,'CCC','2015-10-02')
INSERT INTO @A VALUES (2,'DDD','2015-10-02')

[code]...

how to achieve this in SQL query, i cannot use CTE or temp table as i need to use this code in another tool, it has to be single query, can use subquery or join would be better.

View 4 Replies View Related

Filter Criteria - Temp Table Join Or Where Clause?

Jul 20, 2005

I have a set of udf's dealing that return a one column table of valuesparsed from a comma delimeted string.For example:CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[udf_filter_patient](@patient_list varchar(2000))RETURNS @patient TABLE(patient_id int)ASBEGINinsert into @patientselect patient_id from patient-- parse @patient_list stuff excludedRETURNENDI have come up with the following two schemes to use these udfs. Theseexamples are obviously simplified, and I have a handful of stored proceduresthat will use between 10 or more of these filters. If the two areequivalent, I prefer Method 2 because it makes for much neater SQL whenusing many filter criteria.So my question is, will one noticebly outperform the other? Or is there abetter way in which to filter on a list of criteria?Method 1 :CREATE PROC sp__filter_open_bills@patient_list varchar(2000)ASCREATE TABLE #patient(patient_id int)INSERT INTO #patientSELECTpatient_idFROMdbo.udf_filter_patient( @patient_list )SELECT*FROMopen_billsINNER JOIN #patient on #patient.patient_id = open_bills.patient_idGOMethod 2 :CREATE PROC sp__filter_open_bills@patient_list varchar(2000)ASSELECT*FROMopen_billsWHEREopen_bills.patient_id IN ( SELECT patient_id FROMdbo.udf_filter_patient( @patient_list ) )GOThanks for the help!Chris G

View 4 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: How Query Engine Works While Comparing String With Comparison Operators

Oct 11, 2015

DECLARE @Teams AS TABLE(Team VARCHAR(3))
INSERT INTO @Teams
SELECT 'IND'
UNION
SELECT 'SA'
UNION
SELECT 'AUS'
select Team from @Teams where Team > 'AUS'

[code]....

co-relation between comparison operators in WHERE Clause and the respective output.

View 3 Replies View Related

Should We See Replication Filter Where Clause Text In Profiler TextData On SQL Server 2005?

Sep 25, 2007


We have Merge Replication publications for SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition subscribers.
Some articles have filter statements that send rows to multiple subscribers, based on the value of Host_Name() supplied at run-time.

Our publications work for most subscribers, but we have at least one subscriber who downloads too many rows from one of the filtered tables.

When we run the Select SQL from the article's Filter statement it returns the intended 4 rows for this subscriber.
We cut and pasted the filter statement into query analyzer, substituted the subscriber's value for Host_Name(), executed the statement, and got the proper 4 rows for this subscriber in the results.

But when this subscriber syncs her Compact Edition database it downloads 10 rows - the proper 4 rows that the filter statement should pass, plus 6 other rows that she should not download.
Our hypothesis is that the Filter statement is not properly applied to the article when this subscriber syncs.
Other subscribers get the proper rows when they sync, so the publication's filter statement works in some cases, for some values of Host_Name().

We'd like to see the application of the filter statement at run-time (sync-time), but we have not found the text of the filter statement in SQL Profiler output. Should we expect to see the text of the filter statement in SQL Profiler output?
Is there a better way to debug this error?

FYI, here's the text of the article filter statement:


SELECT <published_columns> FROM [dbo].[TBL_USER] WHERE user_sys_id in (

select u.user_sys_id

from tbl_user u

join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid

where t.terr_no_id like (

select

case (select t.data_access_qnty from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = Host_Name())

when 2 then (select t.terr_no_id from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = Host_Name())

when 3 then (select left(t.terr_no_id,5)+'%' from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = Host_Name())

end

)

)

And here's the statement we ran from Query Analyzer:


declare @id varchar(10)

select @id = 'aultnc'

SELECT * FROM [dbo].[TBL_USER] WHERE user_sys_id in (

select u.user_sys_id

from tbl_user u

join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid

where t.terr_no_id like (

select

case (select t.data_access_qnty from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = @id)

when 2 then (select t.terr_no_id from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = @id)

when 3 then (select left(t.terr_no_id,5)+'%' from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = @id)

end

)

)

Thanks

View 4 Replies View Related

Column Comparison

Jul 20, 2005

I'm in need of a sql query that I'm not sure is possible. Here is anexample of how it's laid out.employee ID Job class Last Change Date12345 x 2/1/200412345 y 1/15/200412345 z 1/1/2004We know that this person is in job class 'x' because it's the mostrecent change. Is there a way to write a query that will exclude thelines 'y' and 'z' because they are currently incorrect?I would appreciate any help I could get. Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved