64 Bit SQL Server 2005 Process Is Only Utilizing One Processor Whereas In 32 Bit Environ. Uses Multiple Processors

Oct 9, 2007



Hello all,

We've had a problem for a few months now that has completely stumped us. We are running a heavily cursored massive data manipulation process on a 32 bit SQL Server instance running on a virtual machine, running ontop of VMWare, with the following specs

Processors: 2x2674MHz processors
Memory: 4GB
RAID 10 disk config

When we run our process on this machine, in total it runs in 30 hours.

When this process is run on another 32 bit server with the following specs

Processors: 8x3658MHx processors
Memory: 8 GB
SAN w/ RAID 5 disk config

It runs 25% slower

But here is the real kicker. When this process is run on a 64 bit server with the following specs

Processors: 8x3658MHz processors
Memory: 8 GB
SAN w/ RAID 5 disk config

It runs 75% slower.

This process consists solely of stored procedures written in TSQL. The weird thing is that on our smaller server, the CPUs' % utilization are evenly balanced (at 20-30%) when this large data manipulation process is running. However on the bigger servers, SQL Server latches onto a single processor and doesn't load balance across other processors. Such that what we're seeing is that only one processor out of the eight will be utilized and it will be throttled at 90% while the other 7 are at zero.

The default configuration settings in all three places.

Has anyone ever seen any behavior like this, where only one processor gets used by SQL Server during processing? Granted our processes are single threaded b/c they are using cursors but, it seems that the single thread shouldn't be restricted to one processor.

Any thoughts?

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQL Server Process Processor Time (CPU Utilization) Over 100%

Mar 13, 2008



We are seeing that the %Processor Time for the sqlservr process in Perfmon is over 100%. I am trying to understand how can the percentage of use be over 100%, and why it is over 100%. Someone told me that if the machine has multiple processors, that it will be over 100%. If that is the case, how can I determine what the maximum and normal values are? If I have 4 processors, does that mean 400% is the max? Does not make sense since it is suppose to be a percentage value...


Could someone explain to me how the CPU Utilization value is being measured, and if it is going over 100%, why that is and how I can determine what the threshold should be for monitoring?

SQL 2005 on Windows 2003 cluster.

Thanks!

View 9 Replies View Related

Multiple Processors

Jun 19, 2003

We are looking at upgrading our SQL Server machine to multiple processors.

Will this act alone result in a performance improvment?

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Best Utilize Multiple Processors?

May 30, 2007

I'm spec up a new server At the minimum I'll specify a quad core cpu. What would be the best way to utilize the cores? Assign a core to specific processes (tempdb?) or let sql server figure out the best way to used the processors it finds?

View 1 Replies View Related

Process Or SQL Transaction Takign Memory And Processor Time

Mar 22, 2002

Hi,

While watching through performance monitor the processor time often goes high above the memory.

Could you please tell me how to find out which process is doing that.

Thanks
John Jayaseelan

View 3 Replies View Related

Saving Data Into A Table & Multiple Processors

Mar 10, 2000

Hello,

Yesterday I was looking to the processor usage in the Task Manager of Windows NT when a script of mine was running. The script was an InfoPump Script; which is a tool from the DecisionBase suite from CA (was previously owned by Platinum). This script contains SQL statements that select data from several tables and stores the result into another table. The SQL code used for this looks fine to me.
The query was running on a Compaq Proliant 5500 with 4 500 Mhz Xeon processors, 1 GB RAM, NT Server 4, SP 5, RAID 5. The SQL Server is configured to use all resources and SQL has normal priority on NT.
When the select part was running al four processors were used for about 75% and when the store happens only 1 processor is used for 100%.
Why is the store not spread over all four processors? It only uses one processor and it seems to be a bottleneck.

Stef

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005 Using A Lot Of Processor

Dec 12, 2007


Hi there

Every once in a while (every couple weeks or so) one of our SQL Server 2005 servers will have its performance take a dive. Response time on applications will slow way down. In checking €˜Task Manager€™ the CPU utilization will be up to 50 to 70 percent for the SQL server service. We have tried looking at €˜Perf Mon€™ there doesn€™t seem to be any consistent performance item that is out of whack. On occasion, it may appear to be a lot of paging going on, but I don€™t know what application is causing it. We€™ve looked at SP_who2 to see if there are any blocks, but there do not appear to be any. Though on occasion we will see a €˜Killed/roll-back€™ entry on €˜SP_who2€™ that has a lot of CPU cycles that, at least at one point in time, had a lot of counts against it.

In looking at a trace that we have set up, we don€™t see anything glaring that is held up or even a recurring theme (application) on the list that would point to a problem.

We find that by restarting the SQL Server service, this resolves the issue for another couple of weeks.

Is there something that I can look at that would tell me at least, what PC name is doing all of the IO against the database. I could then at least call the user and say €˜Hey, what are you doing€™ so that we can start to narrow down what is going on.

Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

View 4 Replies View Related

Planning For SQL Server 2005: 64-bit, OS, Processor, Memory

Jul 23, 2005

I was browsing Microsoft's SQL Server site, looking forsome details about SQL Server 2005. Didn't find whatI was looking for...I'm thinking about moving an existing SQL Server 2000workload to a new box, using SQL Server 2005, andmaybe the 64-bit version.My questions are:1. What is the current target date for release of SQL Server 2005?Will 64-bit ship when 32-bit ships?2. Will 64-bit SQL Server 2005 require a special versionof Windows Server 2003 (e.g. Windows Server 2003 Enterprise x64)?Will it work with both Intel and AMD processors?3. How many CPUs, and how much memory, will be supported bySQL Server 2005, 32-bit and 64-bit, on each OS that can runSQL Server 2005.I'm looking for a chart here, something like the chart onpage 117 of Kalen Delaney's "Inside SQL Server 2000" book.SQL Server 2005 SQL Server 2005Feature Enterprise 32-bit Enterprise 64-bit------------------- ----------------- -----------------CPUs supportedWin Srvr 2003:Win Srvr 2003 Adv:Win Srvr 2003 Ent x64:Physical memorysupportedWin Srvr 2003:Win Srvr 2003 Adv:Win Srvr 2003 Ent x64:Has Microsoft published this info, and I just can find it?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005 Hogging Processor And Not Using Memory

Sep 25, 2006

Hi,

We have recently tested upgrading our web service from sql 2000 to 2005 sp1. The upgrade went smoothly enough, however we now have the problem of the sqlserver.exe process taking 90-100 % of the processors time, but using only 100 MB of memory.

We have 6GB available and we are running the enterprise editions of Windows 2003 and SQL 2005.

Machine specs,

DL380 G2, 2 X 2.8 Ghz Zeon, 6GB ram, Raid 5, database partition of 140 GB, Log partition of 35 GB.

Db is 25 GB, Log is 12 GB. Largest table has 32 million rows.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.



Rob

View 1 Replies View Related

Processor Limit In SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition

Mar 5, 2008

I am looking at running SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition in a clustered environment (2 nodes) and am not sure if the 4 processor limit applies to the number of processors per node or the number of processors it will run on in the entire cluster. Could someone please clarify this for me?

View 4 Replies View Related

Can't Install SQL 2005 Server Express Edition On AMD64 Processor PC.

Feb 3, 2007

Hi.

I am not able to install "SQL 2005 Server Express Edition " on my AMD64 bit Pc..

My OS is: Windows XP Pro (SP 2)

Plz help me as soon as possible..

Mandar

View 3 Replies View Related

Report Server Queue Not Fully Utilizing Resources

Mar 30, 2007

We've set up a report farm with two servers, both 64 bit with 4 CPUs each. One has 16Gig and the other 8Gig of memory. We're using Windows NLB and the load test software confirms that the NLB is working. When we run a number of concurrent reports, both servers get utilized, but they only work on a few at a time. The report server queue doesn't seem to be fully utilizing the hardware. From a prior post I've learned that the report server queue automatically runs 4 reports per CPU. This is not occuring for our setup. Has anyone else experienced the same? Are there any configurations that need to be set to open the queue up? The reports are heavy (300,000 records grouped and summed). Does this affect the queuing process?

View 4 Replies View Related

Stored Procedure Problem Using Multiple Processor

Sep 20, 2001

Hi everybody,

When we execute some stored procedure with the
multiprocessing enable, the stored procedure isn't
working correctly. The stored procedure is starting
but won't finish it's execution.

We start the same stored procedure with just a
single processor enable and it's working.

I check to code into the stored procedure and everything
seems ok.

We run a SQL Server 7.0 with Service Pack 2 on a WinNT 4 Service Pack
5. Someone have an idea for this problem or a point to
check.

Mathieu Noël
CIQ

View 1 Replies View Related

DB Engine :: Multiple Instances With Processor Affinity Or One Instance

Oct 22, 2015

We are currently looking at consolidating 10 servers into one cluster server.

Some servers may be busier than others. Is there any reason to split them up and give the busy databases specific CPUs or is it always better to have them on one instance?

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL Server 7: Processors And Memory

Jun 5, 2001

Is there a limit to the number of processors that can interact with SQL Server 7?

Also, what is the minimum amount of memory necessary to run SQL Server 7?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQl Server Processors And Threads

Aug 30, 2005

Hi,I have an application where I need to find out about the followinginformation regarding SQL server:Processors enabledi.Threads allocatedii.PriorityCan somebody throw some light on this. How are the processors relatedto the threads running and the priority is w.r.t. what?Thanks,Verve.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server On A Subset Of Processors

Jul 10, 2006

Can I install SQL Server on a machine and use less than the # of processor on the machine. In a UNIX world, I'd call it LPARing with Oracle and AIX, and they only let me do this with Enterprise Edition. With Windows, I think the only way is using virtual machines and attaching processors to them? Do any vendors offering LPARing? Can I take any edition of SQL Server and subcapacity price so that I only pay for the processors I'm using?



What about SS Express? It only scheds to a single core - so could I put that on a larger machine?



Thanks!

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005 Error 8630: Internal Query Processor Error

Jan 22, 2007

I have a SProc that runs across many clients without any problems. Every now and then, though, I get the following error:

Internal Query Processor Error: The query processor encountered an unexpected error during execution. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 8630).

All I am doing is populating Temp tables with some data and then joining them together to create a Global Temp table that is being BCP'd to a network share.

Has anyone come across this error in SQL Server 2005? I cannot find anything on Google or Microcsoft.

Thanks,
Robert

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Processor VS Cal

Oct 11, 2006

Does anyone know what microsoft means when it claims that SQL 2005 inprocessor licensing mode is optimized for web use?Stuart

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Standard Ed - Processor Licence

Jul 4, 2007

We are in the process of installing SQL 2005 Standard Edition on Servers with two Intel Xeon 2.6Ghz processors. We want to buy a processor licence for each server rather than CAL's, but do we have to buy two processor licences or is it possible to configure SQL 2005 to only use one processor on a dual processor server and thus only need to buy a single processor licence.

View 5 Replies View Related

Process In SQL Server 2005

Aug 27, 2007

Hi, I am developing an application with vb.net and sql server 2005 express edition. If a user logs in (through the application), I want to query the computer host from sql server 2005 in which the user logs on. Is there any special table or procedure that I can use to achieve this? Thanks.

View 2 Replies View Related

Blocked Process - Sql Server 2005

Jan 30, 2008



I have a question about blocked processes. My manager wants to know how you can know the following when a blocked process is encountered.

The job, program and the statement that is causing the blocking. I have figured out how to determine the database involved but not a lot else. Such as in the blocked process report there is a waitresource field. How to you decipher it?
The report also tells you the client application, but in this case it just states the Micro focus Net Express as the client, not the job or program that is running.

I have an inputbuf listed but it just shows the database id, and the object id. And I am not sure how to locate the object id in this case, I am guessing sys.objects, but I do not seem to find that one.

I have read many things on MSN about the blocked process report, but it does not seem to go into great detail.

I seem to have all the pieces, but do not exactly know how to quickly tie them all together.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Kathy

View 5 Replies View Related

Can SQL 2005 Make Full Use Of A Quad Core Processor

May 22, 2008

I am new to this so I hope I'm doing it right.

We are in the process of replacing a computer that currently has SQL 2005 Management Studio Express installed. We are looking at a Intel Core 2 Quad processor (Q6700) and want to know if SQL will be able to make full use of a quad core. Thanks

View 10 Replies View Related

Utilizing Compound Indexes

Jul 23, 2005

Is it possible to force the use of a compound index in a query?create table Test (ColOne int, ColTwo int)The compound index is ColOne + ColTwo.I'm interested in searching on ColTwo, but I also know the value ofColOne will always be the number "1".How do you structure the SQL statement to concatenate the two INTs anduse the index? Note that I don't have any control over the creation ofthese indexes.

View 3 Replies View Related

Can't Connect To SQL Server 2005 With Pet Shop 4.0 : No Process At Other End Of Pipe?!

Jun 6, 2006

I downloaded MS Pet Shop 4.0 recently for best-practice training purposes. The installation went smoothly with a SQL Server 2005 backend. At first I had a problem authenticating the mspetshop4 user in the database, but that was solved by fixing some settings with the password policy. Now the mspetshop4 user is authenticated properly, but I came across this error instead:Server Error in '/Web' Application.
A connection was successfully established with the server, but then an error occurred during the login process. (provider: Shared Memory Provider, error: 0 - No process is on the other end of the pipe.)
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: A connection was successfully established with the server, but then an error occurred during the login process. (provider: Shared Memory Provider, error: 0 - No process is on the other end of the pipe.)

Source Error:

Line 216:
Line 217: if (conn.State != ConnectionState.Open)
Line 218: conn.Open();
Line 219:
Line 220: cmd.Connection = conn;


Source File: C:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0DBUtilitySQLHelper.cs Line: 218

Stack Trace:

[SqlException (0x80131904): A connection was successfully established with the server, but then an error occurred during the login process. (provider: Shared Memory Provider, error: 0 - No process is on the other end of the pipe.)]
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) +117
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +346
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadSniError(TdsParserStateObject stateObj, UInt32 error) +619
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadSni(DbAsyncResult asyncResult, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +224
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadPacket(Int32 bytesExpected) +113
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadBuffer() +59
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadByte() +36
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +181
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.CompleteLogin(Boolean enlistOK) +56
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.OpenLoginEnlist(SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) +1083
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(DbConnectionPoolIdentity identity, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Object providerInfo, String newPassword, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) +272
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningConnection) +688
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreatePooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnectionOptions options) +82
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.CreateObject(DbConnection owningObject) +558
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.UserCreateRequest(DbConnection owningObject) +126
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject) +651
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +160
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +122
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +229
PetShop.DBUtility.SqlHelper.PrepareCommand(SqlCommand cmd, SqlConnection conn, SqlTransaction trans, CommandType cmdType, String cmdText, SqlParameter[] cmdParms) in C:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0DBUtilitySQLHelper.cs:218
PetShop.DBUtility.SqlHelper.ExecuteReader(String connectionString, CommandType cmdType, String cmdText, SqlParameter[] commandParameters) in C:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0DBUtilitySQLHelper.cs:127
PetShop.SQLServerDAL.Category.GetCategories() in C:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0SQLServerCategory.cs:27
PetShop.BLL.Category.GetCategories() in C:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0BLLCategory.cs:20
PetShop.Web.NavigationControl.BindCategories() in c:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0WebControlsNavigationControl.ascx.cs:53
PetShop.Web.NavigationControl.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in c:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0WebControlsNavigationControl.ascx.cs:27
System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e) +31
System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e) +68
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +88
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +74
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +158
System.Web.UI.BasePartialCachingControl.LoadRecursive() +61
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +158
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +158
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +3035


Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.42; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.42Now I'm clueless. What does No process at the other end of the pipe mean? 

View 2 Replies View Related

Possible To Assign For Each CPU A Different Process Within One SQL Server 2005 On A Multicore Server?

Jun 20, 2006

Hi all,


is it possible to assign for each CPU a different process within one SQL Server 2005?

I got 2 servers (each 4 CPUs; 64 bit system) which should be able to failover, but on the other hand there are reporting/analysing applications and totally different sharepoint/other applications that should be hosted seperately, each on one physical server.

Thanks a lot for any help!

View 3 Replies View Related

Standard Edition 2005 Not Installing On Dual Processor Quad Core (8 Way)

Feb 27, 2008

hi all,
I was under the impression that SQL Server 2005 can install on dual processor, quad core Intel machines.

Here's what we have: Intel Quad Core Xeon (E7340) @ 2.4Ghz. (8 way)

Has anyone encountered any issues w/ this setup -- particularly on this Intel CPU version?

thank you,
Cosmin

View 3 Replies View Related

Access To The Database File Is Not Allowed. [ File Name = ],[,,] Happens In VS2005 Environ But SSMSE Is Ok?

Jul 20, 2007

I am developing a C# mobile 5.0SDK app that utilizes SQL2005 Compact Edition device files on Vista using as far as I know the latest SPs and versions.



Last night, I could open tables from the Server Explorer .sdf file, see the contents, edit the schema, etc. Now today, I assume all of a sudden,I am able to open schema but cannot open the table to see the contents. I get:



Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition captioned error dialog box that says "Access to the database file is not allowed. [ File name = ],[,,]



Using Sql Server 2005 Management Studio Express, I can open the table, do queries etc. I have tried rebooting, deleting, opening old projects, deleting dataset, disconnecting mobile device, but I still get the same error. I have tried stopping the SQL Server(SQLEXPRESS) service on the server but get:



Cannot open MSSLQ$SQLEXPRESS service on computer 'p5w64'. Access is denied.



I have no idea what to do next to start moving forward again, other than try the XP environment which I will do next.



Has anyone experienced this problem?



Thank you.







View 9 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Non Clustered Covered Index Not Utilizing In A Query Plan?

Jul 27, 2015

I had some SQL queries which are using department ID for join , filter , Group By and Select so , i am having index on department ID of my table File Master scheme ..

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[FILE_MASTER](
[FILE_ID] [INT] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[DEPARTMENT_ID] [INT] NULL,
       [CLIENT_ID] [INT] NULL
       ,[LEAD_DETAIL_ID] [INT] NULL

[code]....

The above index only working when there is condition or group by on department ID .and i when i am querying ..

SELECT DISTINCT CL.CLIENT_ID,CL.LOAN_SANCTION_DATE,MIN(CL.INWARD_DATE)AS Inward
FROM dbo.FILE_MASTER AS CL 
GROUP BY CL.CLIENT_ID,CL.LOAN_SANCTION_DATE

and the plan is showing Index scan on index Indx_FM_department_ID .. Why it is not using Index seek , i guess i have both group by Columns in cover index included columns what is the use of cover index then ?

because if i am giving where condition before group by for specific Client ID , Loan Sanction Date it is telling to create separate index on client ID , Loan Sanction Date as per Execution Plan missing index detail ..

View 7 Replies View Related

DB Engine :: Upgrade Two Nodes Utilizing AlwaysOn Of Some Other Method Without Downtime?

Oct 15, 2015

Two servers are configured with Windows 2008 / SQL server 2012 utililizing Always-On for HA. We need to upgrade both servers to Windows 2012 / SQL Server 2014 with minimum downtime(Time for Always-On failover). The upgrade to SQL 2014 is straight forward with for minimum downtime.The Windows upgrade(2008 -> 2012) is the problem. From what I have observed and read in blogs.The Windows node to be upgraded must be removed from the Windows cluster before the node can be upgraded to Win 2012.A Win 2008 and Win 2012 node can not reside in the same cluster. If this is true then the only option I can think of is to dump the DB on WIN 2008 server and restore on Win 2012. This is an outage(time it takes to dump and restore).Is there any other method to upgrade these two nodes utilizing Always-On of some other method without downtime?

View 2 Replies View Related

Using DTS Designer, What Is The Best Way To Process Multiple Files?

Feb 7, 2002

In DTS designer I need to solve the following problem:

Problem:
- Import x-number of flat files into SQL Server one at a time.

Issues:

- I can't call the package recursively to process
the files because I don't want to eat up computer resources.
(there is a possiblity that there could be hundreds of files
that need to be processed and I wouldn't want to have hundreds
of package instances running).

- The files names cannot be read into a list then processed
because while the list is being processed more files could
be "dumped" into the folder by the main frame. And, all files
must be processed.


I thought about scheduling a job at the end of the package
to run the package again, however, I haven't figured out
how to do that and am still looking. DTS is new to me.


Thanks,
Martin

View 3 Replies View Related

Multiple Process In A Single Transaction Using SB

Jul 21, 2006

We have a scenarion in a batch job. There are 3 sp's which are executed for every record in a table. After the execution of first sp the second sp executes depending upon the result of first sp. Simillarly for 2nd and 3rd sp.

Now if any sp execution fails than the whole transaction for that record in the table has to be rolled back.

Can this whole process of executing the multplie sp's insides a single transaction be accomplished using service broker with either a single queue or multiple queues?

                                              sp 1 (1 record)

                                 __________  l_____________

                                l                         l                            l sp2 ( 3 records for 1 record in sp1)

 

Simillalry for the one record in sp2, sp3 executes for multiple records.

Or in other words if processing of any message in a queue fails all the messages that have been processed already shoould be rolled back and no further execution should happen?

Also i would like to know can a conversation group be rolled back if processing of any message in the conversation group fails. I am asking this as we can club sp2 and sp3 together to get the results directly and than try for parallel processing.

P.S. We have a multiprocessor 64 bit server.

thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server On 64 Bit Processor

Sep 20, 2005

Hi,
I would like know the information(hardware requirements and issues) regarding SQL server 2000/2005 implement in 64 bit processor.
Thanks,

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved