Blocked Process - Sql Server 2005

Jan 30, 2008



I have a question about blocked processes. My manager wants to know how you can know the following when a blocked process is encountered.

The job, program and the statement that is causing the blocking. I have figured out how to determine the database involved but not a lot else. Such as in the blocked process report there is a waitresource field. How to you decipher it?
The report also tells you the client application, but in this case it just states the Micro focus Net Express as the client, not the job or program that is running.

I have an inputbuf listed but it just shows the database id, and the object id. And I am not sure how to locate the object id in this case, I am guessing sys.objects, but I do not seem to find that one.

I have read many things on MSN about the blocked process report, but it does not seem to go into great detail.

I seem to have all the pieces, but do not exactly know how to quickly tie them all together.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Kathy

View 5 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Blocked Process

Mar 17, 1999

We are using SQL server 6.5 and currently have about 100 users connections at a given
point in time. The application is Visual Basic 5.0 based and it allows users to create
MS Word documents from the application. These documents names are stored in a table which basically
acts as a reference table. Every time a document needs to be attached to a record
this table is called with an insert/update query. This results in an exclusive page/table
lock and ends up into a blocked process. This finally results into a major halt for
all the system users.

Manual killing of these blocked processes frees up the resources and brings things back to normal
although disruptive to the users.

Any clue as to why the blocked processes are not able to free themsevles up ?
Are we missing something in our SQL configuration that will help us with unblocking
these processes ?

View 1 Replies View Related

Killing A Blocked Process

Jul 21, 1999

If I kill a blocked process, why does the current activity window still show the process? Both processes, blocking and blocked, are scheduled tasks. Also, the blocked process is still listed as a running task in the manage scheduled task window.

View 1 Replies View Related

Process Being Blocked By SPID -1

May 10, 1999

The following is an extract from sp_who2

SPID Status Login HostName BlkBy DBName Command CPUTime DiskIO
----- ---------- ------- -------- ----- ------- ------- ------- ------
162 sleeping om18682 . -1 STIPROD SELECT 236 120

Has anybody experienced a process being blocked by SPID -1.

View 4 Replies View Related

Connection Blocked By Process -2

Oct 18, 2007

Hi,

I have a fairly complex application running which has numerous connections on various threads accessing my sql 2005 database.

Every now and then I find that one of my connections is being blocked by process with a pid of -2.

I assume this is some system process.

The only way I can get my application going again is to restart the sql server.

Can someone tell me what process -2 is?

cheers,
Robert

View 2 Replies View Related

Deadlock - Killing Blocked Process

Nov 24, 1999

we have tables that load overnight. Sometimes a user will try to run a query up against that table while the table is loading and a deadlock occurs. I do not notice this until I get into the office. By this time many tables have not loaded. Is there a way to have SQL6.5 automatically Kill deadlock processes.

View 1 Replies View Related

Creating An Alert For Blocked Process Threshold

Jul 18, 2007

According to BOL you can configure an Alert to notify you when the blocked process threshold has been exceeded:



SQL Server 2005 Books Online

blocked process threshold Option

Use the blocked process threshold option to specify the threshold, in seconds, at which blocked process reports are generated. The threshold can be set from 0 to 86,400. By default, no blocked process reports are produced. This event is not generated for system tasks or for tasks that are waiting on resources that do not generate detectable deadlocks. For more information about deadlock detection, see Detecting and Ending Deadlocks.

You can define an alert to be executed when this event is generated. So for example, you can choose to page the administrator to take appropriate action to handle the blocking situation.



Can someone provide some direction on exactly how this is done? Does it require a Service Broker and queue?

View 5 Replies View Related

Sql Server 2000 Upgrade To 2005 Blocked

Mar 4, 2008

I've inherited 6 sql server 2000 boxes. I've upgrade 3 with no trouble. now I have one that gives the message :
"your upgrade is blocked because of cross-language compatibility rules.
For more information about cross-language support, see the version..."

all servers are 2003, sp2. All SQL is Enterprise edition, default language is "english". even the collation order is
the same. why the cross language message? Any help would be good else I'll be forced to rebuild the DB and load application again. ugly!!




dave

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 SP2 Installation Blocked

Feb 20, 2007

I'm getting the following error when I try to run SQL05 SP2 on my server. When I get to the Authentication screen, I select Windows Authentication and check the box to use for all services. I am logged in using my personal admin account. I click the 'Test' button. Connection to Database Services, instance name 'MSSQLSERVER' is successful. However, connection to Reporting Services, instance name 'myserverSSRS' fails. The error message is: "Login failed: HResult 0x2, Level 16, State 1, Named pipes provider: Could not open a connection to SQL Server[2]. Sqlcmd: Error: Microsoft SQL Native Client: An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server."

I've had problems getting Reporting Services to work. Is this message a result of SSRS not being set up properly? How can I correct this?

View 7 Replies View Related

Blocked From SSRS 2005 After Installing IE7

Dec 21, 2006

After installing IE7, I tried to open SQL Server Reporting Services 2005,

I'm getting a login prompt. I am admin on my laptop. My admin login

doesn't work here.


Am I missing a special security setting for IE7 that I have to change to

allow access to SSRS? I can open the SSRS configuration tool,

but not SSRS itself.



Thanks!!

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 SP4 To SQL 2005 Upgrade Blocked.

Feb 15, 2007

I am upgrading a sql server 2000 with sp4 (I have double and triple checked the sp) on a windows 2003 sp1 server and I keep getting the following error:

Name: Microsoft SQL Server 2000
Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.

Service pack requirement check:
Your upgrade is blocked because of service pack requirements. To proceed, apply the required service pack and then rerun SQL Server Setup. For more information about upgrade support, see the Version and Edition Upgrades topic in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.


I cannot find anything saying that I need any other service pack other than sp4 for sql serer 2000. Any one ever run into this or have a clue what might be causing the installer to think I have the wrong service pack?

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 To 2005 In-place Upgrade Blocked!

Feb 19, 2008

Perhaps someone here can give me a hand with this...

I have three servers running SQL Server 2000. Two are running Windows Server 2000 SP4 with SQL 2000/SP4 and one Windows Server 2003 with SQL 2000/SP?(probably not 4). I copied the installation DVD to a network drive and successfully performed an in-place upgrade of the Windows Server 2003 machine. However, when I try to upgrade either of the other servers, I get an error indicating that I have a service pack problem.

Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.

Service pack requirement check:
Your upgrade is blocked because of service pack requirements. To proceed, apply the required service pack and then rerun SQL Server Setup. For more information about upgrade support, see the Version and Edition Upgrades topic in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.

Of course, the error doesn't indicate what the service pack problem actually is. My SQL 2005 media was probably released before SP4 was released because the Setup Help indicates that you can directly upgrade from SP3, but makes no mention of SP4. I can't imagine there are any migration problems with it since I can't find any reference to it as a problem on any SQL Server sites... So... I'm left wondering what my problem really is... :confused:

Any help would be appreciated.

View 2 Replies View Related

Your Upgrade Is Blocked.. When Adding Components To SQL 2005 Standard Edition SP1

Sep 28, 2006

Name: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Tools

Hello,

I am having a problem when trying to add the Client Components to an existing installation of SQL 2005 Standard Edition SP1 running on Windows 2003 Standard. The server was originally built with SQL 2005 Standard Edition and had SP1 installed at a later date. I am using the CD that SQL was originally installed with which is not a service packed copy of SQL. The reason given when clicking the details button is as follows:

Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.

Build version check:

Your upgrade is blocked because the existing component is a later version than the version you are trying to upgrade to. To modify an existing SQL Server component, go to Add or Remove Programs in Control Panel, select the component you would like to modify, and then click Change/Remove.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Regards

Steve

View 23 Replies View Related

Process In SQL Server 2005

Aug 27, 2007

Hi, I am developing an application with vb.net and sql server 2005 express edition. If a user logs in (through the application), I want to query the computer host from sql server 2005 in which the user logs on. Is there any special table or procedure that I can use to achieve this? Thanks.

View 2 Replies View Related

Can't Connect To SQL Server 2005 With Pet Shop 4.0 : No Process At Other End Of Pipe?!

Jun 6, 2006

I downloaded MS Pet Shop 4.0 recently for best-practice training purposes. The installation went smoothly with a SQL Server 2005 backend. At first I had a problem authenticating the mspetshop4 user in the database, but that was solved by fixing some settings with the password policy. Now the mspetshop4 user is authenticated properly, but I came across this error instead:Server Error in '/Web' Application.
A connection was successfully established with the server, but then an error occurred during the login process. (provider: Shared Memory Provider, error: 0 - No process is on the other end of the pipe.)
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: A connection was successfully established with the server, but then an error occurred during the login process. (provider: Shared Memory Provider, error: 0 - No process is on the other end of the pipe.)

Source Error:

Line 216:
Line 217: if (conn.State != ConnectionState.Open)
Line 218: conn.Open();
Line 219:
Line 220: cmd.Connection = conn;


Source File: C:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0DBUtilitySQLHelper.cs Line: 218

Stack Trace:

[SqlException (0x80131904): A connection was successfully established with the server, but then an error occurred during the login process. (provider: Shared Memory Provider, error: 0 - No process is on the other end of the pipe.)]
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) +117
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +346
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadSniError(TdsParserStateObject stateObj, UInt32 error) +619
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadSni(DbAsyncResult asyncResult, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +224
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadPacket(Int32 bytesExpected) +113
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadBuffer() +59
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadByte() +36
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +181
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.CompleteLogin(Boolean enlistOK) +56
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.OpenLoginEnlist(SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) +1083
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(DbConnectionPoolIdentity identity, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Object providerInfo, String newPassword, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) +272
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningConnection) +688
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreatePooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnectionOptions options) +82
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.CreateObject(DbConnection owningObject) +558
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.UserCreateRequest(DbConnection owningObject) +126
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject) +651
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +160
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +122
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +229
PetShop.DBUtility.SqlHelper.PrepareCommand(SqlCommand cmd, SqlConnection conn, SqlTransaction trans, CommandType cmdType, String cmdText, SqlParameter[] cmdParms) in C:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0DBUtilitySQLHelper.cs:218
PetShop.DBUtility.SqlHelper.ExecuteReader(String connectionString, CommandType cmdType, String cmdText, SqlParameter[] commandParameters) in C:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0DBUtilitySQLHelper.cs:127
PetShop.SQLServerDAL.Category.GetCategories() in C:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0SQLServerCategory.cs:27
PetShop.BLL.Category.GetCategories() in C:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0BLLCategory.cs:20
PetShop.Web.NavigationControl.BindCategories() in c:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0WebControlsNavigationControl.ascx.cs:53
PetShop.Web.NavigationControl.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in c:Program FilesMicrosoft.NET Pet Shop 4.0WebControlsNavigationControl.ascx.cs:27
System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e) +31
System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e) +68
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +88
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +74
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +158
System.Web.UI.BasePartialCachingControl.LoadRecursive() +61
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +158
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +158
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +3035


Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.42; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.42Now I'm clueless. What does No process at the other end of the pipe mean? 

View 2 Replies View Related

Possible To Assign For Each CPU A Different Process Within One SQL Server 2005 On A Multicore Server?

Jun 20, 2006

Hi all,


is it possible to assign for each CPU a different process within one SQL Server 2005?

I got 2 servers (each 4 CPUs; 64 bit system) which should be able to failover, but on the other hand there are reporting/analysing applications and totally different sharepoint/other applications that should be hosted seperately, each on one physical server.

Thanks a lot for any help!

View 3 Replies View Related

64 Bit SQL Server 2005 Process Is Only Utilizing One Processor Whereas In 32 Bit Environ. Uses Multiple Processors

Oct 9, 2007



Hello all,

We've had a problem for a few months now that has completely stumped us. We are running a heavily cursored massive data manipulation process on a 32 bit SQL Server instance running on a virtual machine, running ontop of VMWare, with the following specs

Processors: 2x2674MHz processors
Memory: 4GB
RAID 10 disk config

When we run our process on this machine, in total it runs in 30 hours.

When this process is run on another 32 bit server with the following specs

Processors: 8x3658MHx processors
Memory: 8 GB
SAN w/ RAID 5 disk config

It runs 25% slower

But here is the real kicker. When this process is run on a 64 bit server with the following specs

Processors: 8x3658MHz processors
Memory: 8 GB
SAN w/ RAID 5 disk config

It runs 75% slower.

This process consists solely of stored procedures written in TSQL. The weird thing is that on our smaller server, the CPUs' % utilization are evenly balanced (at 20-30%) when this large data manipulation process is running. However on the bigger servers, SQL Server latches onto a single processor and doesn't load balance across other processors. Such that what we're seeing is that only one processor out of the eight will be utilized and it will be throttled at 90% while the other 7 are at zero.

The default configuration settings in all three places.

Has anyone ever seen any behavior like this, where only one processor gets used by SQL Server during processing? Granted our processes are single threaded b/c they are using cursors but, it seems that the single thread shouldn't be restricted to one processor.

Any thoughts?

View 3 Replies View Related

Port Blocked Causes Server To Not Start

Apr 2, 2015

I have changed SQL Server from default port to another port number. All appears fine. If SQL Server is restarted it is all fine, however, when the server is restarted SQL Server fails to start. If you then log into the server and manually start the services they start just fine. So, it appears that something blocks the port or uses the port upon server startup for a few seconds. The AV folks say that they are not blocking ports and that it AV service actually starts 15 seconds after the SQL start failure.So, the question becomes is how can I track down what is blocking or using that port?

This is Win2012/SQL2014 CU3

Server failed to listen on xxxxx::xxxxxxxxxx <ipv6> xxxxx. Error: 0x2741. To proceed, notify your system administrator.

Server failed to listen on fe80::5efe:10.255.196.25%18 <ipv6> 14001. Error: 0x2741. To proceed, notify your system administrator.

TDSSNIClient initialization failed with error 0x2741, status code 0x1. Reason: Initialization failed with an infrastructure error. Check for previous errors. The requested address is not valid in its context.

Could not start the network library because of an internal error in the network library. To determine the cause, review the errors immediately preceding this one in the error log. SQL Server could not spawn FRunCommunicationsManager thread. Check the SQL Server error log and the Windows event logs for information about possible related problems.

View 4 Replies View Related

Workaround To Connect To SQL Server When Ports Blocked?

Jan 11, 2006

My SQL Server is a shared account at MaximumASP.com a client just deployed my .NET application on GoDaddy.com and they have all there ports blocked and my app cannot connect to the SQL Server. Using "Network Library =dbmssocn" in the connection string did not help and GoDaddy will not help.  MY QUESTION IS: how can I get my .NET app to connect to the SQL Server? web service? This is the first time I have run into this problem. There seems like there has to be some way. THANKS IN ADVANCE!

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2012 :: Task Manager Has Been Blocked From Index Re-org

Apr 6, 2015

This is running on sql server 2012, we have seup the databases on Availability group. The strange behavior i have been seeing the past few weeks is task manager has been blocked from index Re-org but have not found that what that task manager doing.. it won't shows the statement that running but shows as command type= 'Task manager'. Index is so big and i have been stopping this because of triple thread blocking.

View 9 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Unable To Start Agent Due To Blocked Access

Jun 28, 2015

Had some big problems with my SQL Server 2008 R2 SP1 during the last maintenance running on Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise ( upgraded from Standard). I'm getting the following error,

"SQL Server blocked access to procedure 'dbo.sp_sqlagent_has_server_access' of component 'Agent XPs' because this component is turned off as part of the security configuration for this server. A system administrator can enable the use of 'Agent XPs' by using sp_configure. For more information about enabling 'Agent XPs', see "Surface Area Configuration" in SQL Server Books Online."

I did a google search and found others with the problem but the resolution isn't working for me. I ran the following commands, heck I ran them multiple times. No errors come back running these commands. But the same error keeps happening, I even restart the service and then the server again.

sp_configure 'show advanced options', 1;
GO
RECONFIGURE;
GO
sp_configure 'Agent XPs', 1;
GO
RECONFIGURE
GO

The msdb got too big for the disk it was on. I had maintenance plans to clear out the all of histories but I didn't think of the mail items. When I finally saw this problem I tried clearing them out using the stored procedures only with it finally failing because the transaction log got full. Since we didn't have a lot of jobs scheduled I decided to just recreate the msdb. So I scheduled a maintenance window, download SQL Server Service Pack 3.

my steps are as follows:
->diff backup of msdb
->stopped the service and started it again with: NET START MSSQLSERVER /T3608
->detached msdb with: SQLCMD -E -SP-SRVR-SQL-01 -dmaster -Q"EXEC sp_detach_db msdb"
->moved it off the drive
->restarted the service without any startup flags
->recreated msdb with: SQLCMD -E -SP-SRVR-SQL-01 -i"D:Microsoft SQL ->ServerMSSQL10_50.MSSQLSERVERMSSQLInstallinstmsdb.sql" -o"D:Microsoft SQL ServerMSSQL10_50.MSSQLSERVERMSSQLInstallinstmsdb62715.out"

I looked at the log file and there were no actual error messages so I applied service pack 3 and restarted server after it installed, was actually prompted to restart. In my tests I was never prompted to restart the server.Now I never started the agent service after recreating the msdb database since I knew it wasn't on the same version. I just went directly to the latest SP. Our applications are running fine but now I cant do scheduled backups.

View 1 Replies View Related

A Connection Was Successfully Established With The Server, But Then An Error Occurred During The Login Process. (provider: Shared Memory Provider, Error: 0 - No Process Is On The Other End Of The Pipe.)

Apr 7, 2008

i'm going nuts with SQL server notification thing. I have gone throigh this artical which tells how to set user http://www.codeproject.com/KB/database/SqlDependencyPermissions.aspx. This article show how to create new user and setup for sql server notification.But In my case user was alredy existing in database. which is very common senario in most cases. So i did following( check the SQL script below) but then i get this error
"A connection was successfully established with the server, but then an error occurred during the login process. (provider: Shared Memory Provider, error: 0 - No process is on the other end of the pipe.)"
this my sql script
use [master]Go
-- Ensuring that Service Broker is enabled ALTER DATABASE [DatabaseName] SET ENABLE_BROKERGO
-- Switching to our databaseuse [DatabaseName]GO
CREATE SCHEMA schemaname AUTHORIZATION usernameGO
ALTER USER username WITH DEFAULT_SCHEMA = schemaname GO
/* * Creating two new roles. We're not going to set the necessary permissions  * on the user-accounts, but we're going to set them on these two new roles. * At the end of this script, we're simply going to make our two users  * members of these roles. */EXEC sp_addrole 'sql_dependency_subscriber' EXEC sp_addrole 'sql_dependency_starter'
-- Permissions needed for [sql_dependency_starter]GRANT CREATE PROCEDURE to [sql_dependency_starter] GRANT CREATE QUEUE to [sql_dependency_starter]GRANT CREATE SERVICE to [sql_dependency_starter]GRANT REFERENCES on CONTRACT::[http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQL/Notifications/PostQueryNotification]  to [sql_dependency_starter] GRANT VIEW DEFINITION TO [sql_dependency_starter]
-- Permissions needed for [sql_dependency_subscriber] GRANT SELECT to [sql_dependency_subscriber] GRANT SUBSCRIBE QUERY NOTIFICATIONS TO [sql_dependency_subscriber] GRANT RECEIVE ON QueryNotificationErrorsQueue TO [sql_dependency_subscriber] GRANT REFERENCES on CONTRACT::[http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQL/Notifications/PostQueryNotification]  to [sql_dependency_subscriber]
-- Making sure that my users are member of the correct role.EXEC sp_addrolemember 'sql_dependency_starter', 'username'EXEC sp_addrolemember 'sql_dependency_subscriber', 'username'

View 10 Replies View Related

2005 BACKUP LOG Process Goes To Suspended State For Every DB

Dec 4, 2007

Hello. We recently ran into extremely large transaction log sizes on our SQL 2005 box...turns out they were not being backed up. After doing some research, I found that they should be backed up very frequently in order to kee their sizes down. I kind of inherited the mess, but got three maintenance plans set up:


FULL Backup that runs weekly

DIFFERNTIAL Backup that runs nightly

TRANSACTION LOG backup that runs hourly
However, since I implemented the plans there has been high CPU utilization at all times. I finally figured out what was causing it today...the BACKUP LOG process is hanging in "Suspended" mode when I view processes. I have to manually kill them to release the CPU utilization.

How can I trace the cause of the hang? Is there a better way to backup/truncate the log files?

Regards,

Matthew

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 SP1 Not Support Process Update Option?

Jun 16, 2006

as title.



Thanks.,

Kelvin Jor

View 1 Replies View Related

Transaction (Process ID 135) Was Deadlocked On Lock Resources With Another Process And Has Been Chosen As The Deadlock Victim.

Nov 14, 2007



Hi,

I was trying to extract data from the source server using OLEDB Source and SQL Server Destination when i encountered this error:

"Transaction (Process ID 135) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.".

What must be done so that even if the table being queried is locked, i wouldn't experience any deadlock?

cherriesh

View 4 Replies View Related

FCB::Open: Operating System Error 32(The Process Cannot Access The File Because It Is Being Used By Another Process.) Occurred W

Dec 3, 2007

Hello all,
I am running into an interesting scenario on my desktop. I'm running developer edition on Windows XP Professional (9.00.3042.00 SP2 Developer Edition). OS is autopatched via corporate policy and I saw some patches go in last week. This machine is also a hand-me-down so I don't have a clean install of the databases on the machine but I am local admin.

So, starting last week after a forced remote reboot (also a policy) I noticed a few of the databases didn't start back up. I chalked it up to the hard shutdown and went along my merry way. Friday however I know I shut my machine down nicely and this morning when I booted up, I was in the same state I was last Wenesday. 7 of the 18 databases on my machine came up with

FCB:pen: Operating system error 32(The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.) occurred while creating or opening file 'C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLDataTest.mdf'. Diagnose and correct the operating system error, and retry the operation.
and it also logs
FCB:pen failed: Could not open file C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLDataTest.mdf for file number 1. OS error: 32(The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.).

I've caught references to the auto close feature being a possible culprit, no dice as the databases in question are set to False. Recovery mode varies on the databases from Simple to Full. If I cycle the SQL Server service, whatever transient issue it was having with those files is gone.
As much as I'd love to disable the virus scanner, network security would not be amused. The data and log files appear to have the same permissions as unaffected database files. Nothing's set to read only or archive as I've caught on other forums as possible gremlins. I have sufficient disk space and the databases are set for unrestricted growth.

Any thoughts on what I could look at? If it was everything coming up in RECOVERY_PENDING it's make more sense to me than a hit or miss type of thing I'm experiencing now.

View 13 Replies View Related

[Execute Process Task] Error:The Process Exit Code Was -1 While The Expected Was 0.

Mar 11, 2008

Dear list
Im designing a package that uses Microsofts preplog.exe to prepare web log files to be imported into SQL Server

What Im trying to do is convert this cmd that works into an execute process task
D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoad>preplog ex.log > out.log
the above dos cmd works 100%



However when I use the Execute Process Task I get this error
[Execute Process Task] Error: In Executing "D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoadpreplog.exe" "" at "D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoad", The process exit code was "-1" while the expected was "0".

There are two package varaibles
User::gsPreplogInput = ex.log
User::gsPreplogOutput = out.log

Here are the task properties
RequireFullFileName = True
Executable = D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoadpreplog.exe
Arguments =
WorkingDirectory = D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoad
StandardInputVariable = User::gsPreplogInput
StandardOutputVariable = User::gsPreplogOutput
StandardErrorVariable =
FailTaskIfReturnCodeIsNotSuccessValue = True
SuccessValue = 0
TimeOut = 0

thanks in advance
Dave

View 1 Replies View Related

Execute Process Task Error - The Process Exit Code Was 1 While The Expected Was 0.

Jan 30, 2007

How do I use the execute process task? I am trying to unzip the file using the freeware PZUnzip.exe and I tried to place the entire command in a batch file and specified the working directory as the location of the batch file, but the task fails with the error:

SSIS package "IngramWeeklyPOS.dtsx" starting.

Error: 0xC0029151 at Unzip download file, Execute Process Task: In Executing "C:ETLPOSDataIngramWeeklyUnzip.bat" "" at "C:ETLPOSDataIngramWeekly", The process exit code was "1" while the expected was "0".

Task failed: Unzip download file

SSIS package "IngramWeeklyPOS.dtsx" finished: Success.

Then I tried to specify the exe directly in the Executable property and the agruments as the location of the zip file and the directory to unzip the files in, but this time it fails with the following message:

SSIS package "IngramWeeklyPOS.dtsx" starting.

Error: 0xC002F304 at Unzip download file, Execute Process Task: An error occurred with the following error message: "%1 is not a valid Win32 application".

Task failed: Unzip download file

SSIS package "IngramWeeklyPOS.dtsx" finished: Success.

The command in the batch file when run from the command line works perfectly and unzips the file, so there is absolutely no problem with the command, I believe it is just the set up of the variables on the execute process task editor under Process. Any input on resolving this will be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Monisha

View 1 Replies View Related

Execute Process Task - Error :The Process Exit Code Was 2 While The Expected Was 0.

Mar 20, 2008



I am designing a utility which will keep two similar databases in sync. In other words, copying the new data from db1 to db2 and updating the old data from db1 to db2.

For this I am making use of the 'Tablediff' utility which when provided with server name, database, table info will generate .sql file which can be used to keep the target table in sync with the source table.

I am using the Execute Process Task and the process parameters I am providing are:



WorkingDirectory : C:Program Files (x86)Microsoft SQL Server90COM
Executable : C:SQL_bat_FilesSQL5TC_CTIcustomer.bat

The customer.bat file will have the following code:
tablediff -sourceserver "LV-SQL5" -sourcedatabase "TC_CTI" -sourcetable "CUSTOMER_1" -destinationserver "LV-SQL2" -destinationdatabase "TC_CTI" -destinationtable "CUSTOMER" -f "c:SQL_bat_Filessql5TC_CTIsql_filescustomer1"

the .sql file will be generated at: C:SQL_bat_Filessql5TC_CTIsql_filescustomer1.

The Problem:
The Execute Process Task is working fine, ie., the tables are being compared correctly and the .SQL file is being generated as desired. But the task as such is reporting faliure with the following error :

[Execute Process Task] Error: In Executing "C:SQL_bat_FilesSQL5TC_CTIpackage_occurrence.bat" "" at "C:Program Files (x86)Microsoft SQL Server90COM", The process exit code was "2" while the expected was "0". ]

Some of you may suggest to just set the ForceExecutionResult = Success (infact this is what I am doing now just to get the program working), but, this is not what I desire.

Can anyone help ?




View 9 Replies View Related

Integration Services :: Dataload Process - Error Capturing Process

Aug 20, 2014

I'm pulling data from Oracle db and load into MS-SQL 2008.For my data type checks during the data load process, what are options to ensure that the data being processed wouldn't fail. such that I can verify first in-hand with the target type of data and then if its valid format load it into destination table else mark it with error flag and push into errors table... All this at the row level.One way I can think of is to load into a staging table then get the source & destination table -column data types, compare them and proceed.

should I just try loading the data directly and if it fails try trouble shooting(which could be a difficult task as I wouldn't know what caused error...)

View 3 Replies View Related

Transaction (Process ID 66) Was Deadlocked On Lock Resources With Another Process.

Feb 14, 2007

Hi Folks,

I am having this table locking issue that I need to start paying attention to as its getting more frequent.

The problem is that the data in the tables is live finance data that needs to be changed and viewed almost real time so what I have picked up so far is that using 'table Hints' may not be a good idea.

I have a guy at work telling me that introducing a data access layer is the only way to solve this, I am not convinced but havnt enough knowledge to back my own feeling up. (asp system not .net).

Thanks in advance

View 1 Replies View Related

Transaction (Process ID 65) Was Deadlocked On Lock Resources With Another Process

Jan 6, 2012

We are facing deadlock issue in our web application. The below message is coming:

> Session ID: pwdagc55bdps0q45q0j4ux55
> Location: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> Error in: http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxxx/Manhatta...Bar=&Mode=Edit
> Notes:
> Parameters:
> __EVENTTARGET:
> __EVENTARGUMENT:

[code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Process Growing Very Large Working With Visual Basic 6

Sep 25, 2006

We recently installed SQL server 2005 on a couple of our servers.  I use Visual Basic 6.0 at the moment and use ADO to connect to our various SQL servers.

I recently discovered on one of the new servers, that every time my programs runs, (every 4 minutes for 12 hours a day) the SQL process shown in task manager grows by 1-10 Megs.

The SQL process was at 776,912K when I rebooted this afternoon.  It started back up at 106,120K.

I am not doing anything differently than I did when my programs were talking to SQL 2000, and I have never seen this memory leak issue.  Is there something extra I need to do in SQL 2005 to finish/clear these SQL queries and not bog down SQL's memory?







An example of how I would connect and do a SQL transaction:

Dim cn as ADODB.Connection

Dim rs as ADODB.RecordSet


Set cn = New ADODB.Connection

Set rs = New ADODB.Connection

cn.Open strConnect

select1 = "select firstName, lastName from clients"
rs.Open select1, cn, adOpenKeyset, adLockOptimistic

If rs.EOF = False Then

    rs.AddNew

End If


rs!firstName = Trim(Text1(0))
rs!lastName = Trim(Text1(1))

rs.Update

rs.Close
cn.Close

At the end of the program's run I would:

Set cn = Nothing

Set rs = Nothing

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved