SQL Server 7: Processors And Memory

Jun 5, 2001

Is there a limit to the number of processors that can interact with SQL Server 7?

Also, what is the minimum amount of memory necessary to run SQL Server 7?

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQl Server Processors And Threads

Aug 30, 2005

Hi,I have an application where I need to find out about the followinginformation regarding SQL server:Processors enabledi.Threads allocatedii.PriorityCan somebody throw some light on this. How are the processors relatedto the threads running and the priority is w.r.t. what?Thanks,Verve.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server On A Subset Of Processors

Jul 10, 2006

Can I install SQL Server on a machine and use less than the # of processor on the machine. In a UNIX world, I'd call it LPARing with Oracle and AIX, and they only let me do this with Enterprise Edition. With Windows, I think the only way is using virtual machines and attaching processors to them? Do any vendors offering LPARing? Can I take any edition of SQL Server and subcapacity price so that I only pay for the processors I'm using?



What about SS Express? It only scheds to a single core - so could I put that on a larger machine?



Thanks!

View 5 Replies View Related

64 Bit SQL Server 2005 Process Is Only Utilizing One Processor Whereas In 32 Bit Environ. Uses Multiple Processors

Oct 9, 2007



Hello all,

We've had a problem for a few months now that has completely stumped us. We are running a heavily cursored massive data manipulation process on a 32 bit SQL Server instance running on a virtual machine, running ontop of VMWare, with the following specs

Processors: 2x2674MHz processors
Memory: 4GB
RAID 10 disk config

When we run our process on this machine, in total it runs in 30 hours.

When this process is run on another 32 bit server with the following specs

Processors: 8x3658MHx processors
Memory: 8 GB
SAN w/ RAID 5 disk config

It runs 25% slower

But here is the real kicker. When this process is run on a 64 bit server with the following specs

Processors: 8x3658MHz processors
Memory: 8 GB
SAN w/ RAID 5 disk config

It runs 75% slower.

This process consists solely of stored procedures written in TSQL. The weird thing is that on our smaller server, the CPUs' % utilization are evenly balanced (at 20-30%) when this large data manipulation process is running. However on the bigger servers, SQL Server latches onto a single processor and doesn't load balance across other processors. Such that what we're seeing is that only one processor out of the eight will be utilized and it will be throttled at 90% while the other 7 are at zero.

The default configuration settings in all three places.

Has anyone ever seen any behavior like this, where only one processor gets used by SQL Server during processing? Granted our processes are single threaded b/c they are using cursors but, it seems that the single thread shouldn't be restricted to one processor.

Any thoughts?

View 3 Replies View Related

Performance Issues Total Server Memory Vs Target Server Memory

Aug 2, 2006

Hi

I did a load testing and found the following observations:

1. The Memory:Pages/sec was crossing the limit beyond 20.

2. The Target Server Memory was always greater than Total Server Memory

Seeing the above data it seems to be memory pressure. But I found that AvailableMemory was always above 200 MB. Also Buffer Cache HitRatio was close to 99.99. What could be the reason for the above behavior?

View 1 Replies View Related

No. Of Processors

May 2, 2000

Hi all,
I am using sql server 7 i am having 4 processors in development server.
How i have to allocate those servers, means all 4 do i need to allocate to sql only or 3 processors.
same like 8 processors in production, how many processors to sql..
pls tell me the way..and how..

thank u all

esh

View 4 Replies View Related

Processors(4) 95% Then 2%, Over And Over

Nov 18, 1999

Specs: Dell 6350 Poweredge, 4 Xeon 500, 4GB Ram
SQL 7 Sp1.

At some point, my 4 processors began a cycle of Peaks and Valleys.
AFter stopping ALL processes using the SQL server the processors were still doing this Max, then none, Max, then none.

I think the oddest part of this is that all 4 processoers were Exactly the same Peaks/Valleys from my Workstation (perfmon).

Anone had their processors do this? HELP PLEASE.. .

View 2 Replies View Related

Too Many Processors

Jun 24, 2003

While installing SQL2k I selected a 4 processor liscense aggreement. The server only has two. Does anybody know of a technial reason I should change it back? Can it be done without reinstalling?

Sidney Ives
Database Administrator
Sentara Healthcare

View 2 Replies View Related

Sql Server 2000 Using Less Memory After More Memory Added

Aug 22, 2007

sql server 2000 is running on windows server 2003 ... 4gb of memory on server .... 2003 was allocated 2.3gb nd sql server was allocated (and using all of it) 1.6gb for total of approx 4gb based on idera monitor software ... all memory allocated betweeen the OS and sql server .... then 4 more gb of memory added for total now of 8g ... now idera monitor shows 1.7gb for OS and 1.0 gb for sql server ..... 'system' info shows 8gb memory with PAE ... so I assume that the full 8gb can now be addressed .... why are less resources being used now with more total memory .... especially sql server ..... i thought about specifying a minimum memmry for sql server but i amnot convinced that would even work since it seems that this 1gb limit is artificial .... it it used 1.6 gb before why would it not use at least that much now ??

thank you

View 4 Replies View Related

Multiple Processors

Jun 19, 2003

We are looking at upgrading our SQL Server machine to multiple processors.

Will this act alone result in a performance improvment?

View 3 Replies View Related

Processors Licensed

Sep 14, 2007

how to find out how many processors are licensed on the server?

=============================
http://www.sqlserverstudy.com

View 1 Replies View Related

Dual Processors & Performance

Mar 17, 1999

We have a 200MHz Pentium Pro based machine, with 128MB RAM running SQL Server 6.5. Because of performance issues, we are contemplating an upgrade to a dual 200MHz Pentium Pro processor with 256MB RAM. However, the vendor we are dealing with has suggested an upgrade to a single Pentiun II/333MHz first, and if this still causes problems, then to a dual P II/333MHz.
Does anyone have any suggestions from similar upgrades that they may have undergone?
We have 72MB allocated to SQL Server.

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Best Utilize Multiple Processors?

May 30, 2007

I'm spec up a new server At the minimum I'll specify a quad core cpu. What would be the best way to utilize the cores? Assign a core to specific processes (tempdb?) or let sql server figure out the best way to used the processors it finds?

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Limit Processors Used (for Licensing Purposes)?

Jul 18, 2007

Is it possible in SQL Server 2005 to limit the number of processors used? For cost reasons, we are consolidating servers and want to start running SQL Server 2005 on one of our dual-processor Win2K3 machines instead of the standalone machine it's currently running on. Because we have about 75 users, it's only cost effective to purchase a processor license (vs. a server license with CALs). But right now we only need and can only afford a single processor license, not two. So...

Is there any way in 2005 to limit the number of processors used so that we only need to purchase one processor license? I know in 2000 you could set this on the "Processor" tab of the "SQL Server Properties" dialog. In 2005, is this accomplished by unchecking the "Processor Affinity" and "I/O Affinity" checkboxes for processor #2 on the "Processors" page of the "Server Properties" dialog? If I uncheck these two options does that fully disable SQL Server 2005 from accessing the second processor in any way? From things I've read I can't tell if it restricts access to the second processor completely or if it just places some limitations on the ways it accesses the second processor.
Also, the licensing information for SQL Server 2005 leads me to believe that if you are going down the "processor licensing" route that you have to buy a processor license for every processor that the OS itself has access to and not just what processors SQL Server has access to. I thought I understood that in SQL Server 2000 the licensing information did allow you to buy a processor license just for each processor that SQL Server 2000 had access to, but has that changed for 2005?



Hope someone can provide some clarification on limiting processor access and the licensing implications for SQL Server 2005.



Thanks,

Scott



View 5 Replies View Related

Saving Data Into A Table & Multiple Processors

Mar 10, 2000

Hello,

Yesterday I was looking to the processor usage in the Task Manager of Windows NT when a script of mine was running. The script was an InfoPump Script; which is a tool from the DecisionBase suite from CA (was previously owned by Platinum). This script contains SQL statements that select data from several tables and stores the result into another table. The SQL code used for this looks fine to me.
The query was running on a Compaq Proliant 5500 with 4 500 Mhz Xeon processors, 1 GB RAM, NT Server 4, SP 5, RAID 5. The SQL Server is configured to use all resources and SQL has normal priority on NT.
When the select part was running al four processors were used for about 75% and when the store happens only 1 processor is used for 100%.
Why is the store not spread over all four processors? It only uses one processor and it seems to be a bottleneck.

Stef

View 2 Replies View Related

Oracle Licensing For Dual Core Processors

Nov 23, 2005

Hi,Is there a reason why we have to pay more for licensing for a differentkind of processor?Why are we not charged for the Hyperthreading on some processors also.If Oracle is really conserned about the low end business market (smalland medium), then they should drop their attitude on Dual Coreprocessors.If they start charging as if it was a normal processor, and ask thenormal price, then they would get more of this market coming in.As long as Oracle keeps on having the attitude of charging more,because Intel or some other cpu vendor decided to mprove theirprocessors because of overheating problems, I will have the attitudethat I will keep on reoccomending alternatives for Orcle like Mysql /Postgre sql / Sybase, etc to the small/medium sector.Microsoft's pricing model on double core processors suddenly soundallot better.Oracle are shooting themselves in the foot! Or am I the only personfeeling this way?Shaun O'Reilly

View 2 Replies View Related

Standard Edition's Support Of 4 Processors - Does This Exclude Mulit-core Procs?

Feb 13, 2008

When Standard Edition says it supports 4 processors, is this just the physical processor or do we have to factor in multiple cores?

If SE supports 4 physical quad-core processors, is it written to optimally utilize the quad-core technology or would I be better off using Enterprise Edition?

Dave

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL In-Memory :: Table Memory Optimization Advisor Validation Passed But Cannot Migrate

Jul 13, 2015

I am looking to test this feature - and the "Transaction Performance Collector" has recommended me a table to port to In-Memory OLTP. 

I have now tried the "Table Memory Optimization Advisor" tool.

After a couple of tweaks to the table design - the tool is now passing validation but the tool is not allowing to progress to the next step:

Could it be down to not having enough memory? But would this not show in the advisor?

View 4 Replies View Related

Attempted To Read Or Write Protected Memory. This Is Often An Indication That Other Memory Is Corrupt. (Microsoft Visual Studio)

Sep 28, 2007

Hello. I have received the follwoing error upon an attempt to Browse the Cube. All other tabs are functional, including the Calculations tab. We are running Windows Server 2003 SP2 and SQL Server 2005 SP2. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

**EDIT** - Have confirmed SP1 for VS2005 is installed both locally and on server, also.


Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. (Microsoft Visual Studio)

------------------------------
Program Location:

at Microsoft.Office.Interop.Owc11.PivotView.get_FieldSets()
at Microsoft.AnalysisServices.Controls.PivotTableFontAdjustor.TransformFonts(Font font)
at Microsoft.AnalysisServices.Browse.CubeBrowser.UpdatePivotTable(Boolean translate)
at Microsoft.AnalysisServices.Browse.CubeBrowser.UpdateAll(Boolean translate)
at Microsoft.AnalysisServices.Browse.CubeBrowser.InitialUpdate()
at Microsoft.AnalysisServices.Browse.CubeBrowser.SupportFunctionWhichCanFail(FunctionWhichCanFail function)

View 4 Replies View Related

AWE/Lock Page In Memory Drawbacks? Min/Max Settings, Memory Issues

Oct 11, 2007

I've been researching AWE to determine if we should enable this for our environment.

Currently we have a quad core box with 4 gb of RAM (VMware). OS: Windows 2003 std, SQL Server 2005 std. 3GB is not set but will be as soon as we can perform maintenance on the server.

I have read mixed feedback on AWE, either it works great or grinds you to a hault. I would assume that the grinding to a hault is due to not setting the min/max values correctly or not enabling the lock page in memory setting.

We only have one instance of SQL on the server and this box won't be used for anything else aside from hosting SQL services. We do plan on running SSRS off of this server as well.

1. Will running SSRS and enabling AWE cause me problems? Will I have to reduce the max setting by the SSRS memory usage or will it share and play nice?

2. How do I go about setting the Max value? Should it be less than the physical RAM in the box? Right now its set to the default of 214748364, even if I don't enable AWE should this default value be changed?

3. It seems that even at idle the SQL server holds a lot of memory and the page file grows. If I restart the process in the morning, memory usage in taskmon is at 600mb or so. By the end of the day, its up around 2gb. How can I track down whats causing this, should this even concern me?

4. The lock Page in memory setting worries me. Everything I've read on this seems to give a warning about serious OS and other program support degradation. In some cases to the point where they have to restore the settings on the server before they can bring it back up. What are your thoughts on this.

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL In-Memory :: How To Reduce Memory Usage Without Killing Any Process

Aug 28, 2015

I have a Windows sever 2012 with sql server 2012 enterprise. Ram size is 22GB. Sometimes SQL sever takes 95% memory.My question, How to reduce memory size without killing any process because it's production server.So there are many background process is running. And,Is there any guides to learn why Memory is raise d so high and how to reduce it.

View 10 Replies View Related

Would Max Memory Including SSIS And SSAS Memory

Mar 27, 2008

Hello, I understand that we should use SSMS -> Server Properties -> Memory to put a cap on the SQL server memory usage, therefore it gives some space memory for OS, this is based on the fact if the max memory is not specified, SQL will use whatever available memory and eventually crash the system.

My question is that when a server has SSIS and SSAS services installed along with the SQL service. Would the max memory setting covers the SSIS and SSAS memory usage, or the SSIS and SSAS has to shared the memory with OS?

Thanks,
fshguo.

View 1 Replies View Related

Memory Issues, SSIS Package Out Of Memory Help

Dec 6, 2006

I am running Visual Studio 2005. I have an SSIS Package which is consuming a huge amount of memory. During the execution of the package the memory keeps increasing. Until finally i get an Out of Memory exception. I have run this package using dtexec, and in the BIDS. No difference. I do have some script components and have added some code to get the assemblies in the current appdomain. I do see that one particular assembly is increasing on every loop. VBAssembly every time it hits the script component is increasing by 6, and along with it the memory is climbing. What is this VBAssembly being used for is there an update to SQL Server Integration Services that I need?

Thanks! Aaron B.

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL In-Memory :: How To Find Memory Usage By Index

Oct 4, 2015

i want to create a lot of index for my database for performance.but i need find memory usage by indexes.

How to find memory usage by index in sql server?

View 9 Replies View Related

SQL In-Memory :: Remove Memory Optimized Filegroup

Jun 15, 2015

I've a database with a memory optimized filegroup on it. How can I remove it?I have removed the memory optimized table I had on it, but when I try to remove the filegroup I receive an error.

View 12 Replies View Related

Memory Configurations For SQL Server 2005 EE X64 With SQL Server 2000 EE X32 On Windows Server EE X64 Server

Apr 20, 2007

My server is a dual AMD x64 2.19 GHz with 8 GB RAM running under Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition with service pack 1 installed. We have SQL 2000 32-bit Enterprise installed in the default instance. AWE is enabled using Dynamically configured SQL Server memory with 6215 MB minimum memory and 6656 maximum memory settings.

I have now installed, side-by-side, SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition in a separate named instance. Everything is running fine but I believe SQL Server2005 could run faster and need to ensure I am giving it plenty of resources. I realize AWE is not needed with SQL Server 2005 and I have seen suggestions to grant the SQL Server account the 'lock pages in memory' rights. This box only runs the SQL 2000 and SQL 2005 server databases and I would like to ensure, if possible, that each is splitting the available memory equally, at least until we can retire SQL Server 2000 next year. Any suggestions?

View 8 Replies View Related

Memory Management (fixed Memory, AWE)

Jul 17, 2006

Hi,

I am going to install SQL Server 2000 (then SQL 2K5) on a Win Server 2K3 with 8 GB of ram, but it will be 16 GB in the near future.

I would like to reserve a fixed memory (for momemt less than 3-4 GB) for SQL Server and the rest for application (virtualization).

Without AWE enabled, max memory for SQL Server 2K5 is 4GB as for SQL Server 2000?

How can I manage and optimize memory keeping in mind AWE. (any doc, website available?)

Thank







View 5 Replies View Related

ODBC Server Driver Shared Memory / Server Does Not Exist Or Access Denied

Nov 8, 2015

I am receiving the following error when starting a program called ShelbySystems that is supposed to connect to a local database. I don't think this is a security issue but I don't know much about SQL server either so...

  DIAG [08001] [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][Shared Memory]SQL Server does not exist or access denied. (17)
  DIAG [01000] [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][Shared Memory]ConnectionOpen (Connect()). (2)

System Info:
Windows 10 Home - upgrade from 8 64 bit
SQL server 2012 Express
SQL Backwards compatibility 2005 64 bit
ShelbySystems software v5.4

I am including the trace log in case it is useful.

DBInstall 130c-728ENTER SQLAllocHandle
SQLSMALLINT 1 <SQL_HANDLE_ENV>
SQLHANDLE 0x00000000
SQLHANDLE * 0x02EC58F4

[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Configuring Memory Per Query Option And Index Create Memory Option

Feb 10, 2015

So I started a new job recently and have noticed a few strange configurations. Typically I would never mess with min memory per query option and index create memory option configuration because i just haven't seen any need to. My typical thought is that if it isn't broke... They have been modified on every single server in my environment.

From Books Online:
• This option is an advanced option and should be changed only by an experienced database administrator or certified SQL Server technician.
• The index create memory option is self-configuring and usually works without requiring adjustment. However, if you experience difficulties creating indexes, consider increasing the value of this option from its run value.

View 3 Replies View Related

How Do You Troubleshoot Memory Leak Issues? What Tools Can Use To Diagnose Memory Leak Problems? In MS SQL ?

Mar 20, 2008

Hello frnds Can Anybody explai what does it mean by question itself and how to resole it ?

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server Memory

Nov 14, 2007

  
Dear All, 
I have hosted ASP.Net site with Sql server 2005
I have also configured State server for my site and started ASPNET State Server 
I have gone one problem hat is SQL serve memory varies form 800MB to 1GB
I have been closing all the db objects in my code also installed SQL serve SP 2 still the problem exist  
Can any one help
 

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server Out Of Memory

Mar 24, 2004

Hi all,
I am using StringBuilder to build a huge insert string which clubs around 12,000 insert strings into a single string. But whle executing this string the SQL server does no insert and the profiler shows that SQL server was out of memory. Any ideas?
Is there a limit to the maximum number of inserts I can do?

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL Server Memory

May 2, 2002

We have an issue where every month or so one of our servers that we upgraded from SQL 7 to SQL 2000 says that its memory is low. We get this error through our SQLProbe application. If we reboot it will go away. Any suggestions?

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved